December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: "Show me an example of terrorists using the Internet or crypto"
by phelix＠vallnet.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On 4 Oct 1997 21:48:23 -0500, Jonathan Wienke <JonWienk(a)ix.netcom.com> wrote: >After the ordinance was passed, there was one >violent crime the first year, and three the next. There it is. Absolute Proof!!!! After everybody finally got those dreadful guns, there was a 300% increase in the murder rate. Guns are evil. Ban them now!!! (Just an example of what people do with statistics these days.) -- Phelix ps. Here's the entire paragraph: Before Kennesaw, Georgia passed its famous (or infamous) ordinance requiring each household in the city to own a gun and allowing concealed carry of firearms, it had an average of 25-27 violent crimes (murder, armed robbery, etc) per year. After the ordinance was passed, there was one violent crime the first year, and three the next. The gun control shills in the press reported this as a tripling in the violent crime rate. Since the state of Florida passed a "shall issue" concealed carry law (if you apply, pay the fee, pass the safety course, and are not a felon or mentally incompetent, the state shall issue you a concealed carry permit) it has experienced significant reductions (10-20%) in the rates of murder, rape, armed robbery, and other violent crimes. Even in England and Scotland, this inverse relationship between private gun ownership and violent crime can be demonstrated, according to Colin Greenwood, retired chief of the West Yorkshire Constabulary and criminology researcher since the sixties.

1 0

Re: Stronghold
by phelix＠vallnet.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On 5 Oct 1997 00:21:33 -0500, nobody(a)REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) wrote: > >John Young wrote: >> Dimitri: >> Perhaps this is unfair, but it now appears that you are using >> the disputed censorship issue to cloud your reluctance, or >> inability, to substantiate a fault in Stronghold. > >Unless C2Net publicly announces that Dimitri is free to post >anything he chooses about C2Net and the software they produce, >without threat of lawsuit or prosecution, then it is patently >unfair to castigate him for failing to share whatever information >he may have in regard to their product. >Like it or not, C2Net has declared that the integrity of their >product is dependent upon men with guns who have the power to >take people before the inquisitors, squelching all intimations >of weakness or impropriety in the design of their product. > Use the remailers. That's what they're there for. Am I being overly simplistic here? -- Phelix

1 0

Re: Stronghold
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

In <343b60e7.102167602(a)128.2.84.191>, phelix(a)vallnet.com writes: }On 5 Oct 1997 00:21:33 -0500, nobody(a)REPLAY.COM (Anonymous) wrote: } }> }>John Young wrote: }>> Dimitri: }>> Perhaps this is unfair, but it now appears that you are using }>> the disputed censorship issue to cloud your reluctance, or }>> inability, to substantiate a fault in Stronghold. }> }>Unless C2Net publicly announces that Dimitri is free to post }>anything he chooses about C2Net and the software they produce, }>without threat of lawsuit or prosecution, then it is patently A "public announcement" by the proven liars at C2 doesn't constitute a release from liability and wouldn't do much, legally, to protect Vulis from harrassment lawsuits. C2 can turn around and sue Vulis anyway. "So, I lied. Again." - Sameer }>unfair to castigate him for failing to share whatever information }>he may have in regard to their product. }>Like it or not, C2Net has declared that the integrity of their }>product is dependent upon men with guns who have the power to }>take people before the inquisitors, squelching all intimations }>of weakness or impropriety in the design of their product. }> } }Use the remailers. That's what they're there for. Am I being overly }simplistic here? If someone other than Vulis (me, for instance) published the Stronghold backdoor (widely known by now) via an anonymous remailer, then Sameer Parekh could still sue Vulis for having discovered it first, or to "make example" of him, and to intidimate other security experts who are aware of Stronghold's many holes. For example, Sandy Sandfort, Parekh's marketing director, wrote to Vulis: } ... we'll slap a libel suit across your emigrant ass, take back }your green card, deport you and tell Russia that you called Yeltsin a }cocksucker ... C2 is obviously deperate to suppress the information that's already known to an increasing number of people in the field. Their threats against Vulis may be one of the reasons why none of the security experts, who confirmed the presense of serious security flaws in Stronghold, are saying much about this. The BackdoorMonger

1 0

Re: Traffic Analysis (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Subject: Re: Traffic Analysis (fwd) > Date: Sun, 5 Oct 97 11:59:53 -0400 > > On 10/3/97 10:49 AM, Jim Choate (ravage(a)ssz.com) passed this wisdom: > > >If the MTBF for a remailer is n then the MTBF for m remailers is > >n*m. Inother words the remailer chain gets less reliable as it gets > >longer. > > Jim, you want to take a look at that "n*m" again ... it doesn't > wash. means MTBF goes *up* which means *more* reliable. Remember n is a fraction, failures/time_period ... If your MTBF is 1 failure per year for each system and you have 10 systems your MTBF is 10 failures per year. Looks like multiplication to me.... Course you can look at it another way as well. Which would mean you would have 1 failure every 10th of a year. That's division, and also misleading because failures don't care about the time period, they may happen all at once. Depends on how you look at MTBF, I generaly look at it the first way because I can use addition if I'm working on a system that don't have multiplication (eg machine code on a 68HC11) that way I don't have to build some damn floating poing library to do division ... Statistics, damn statistics, and lies. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there | | be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. | | | | -Alan Greenspan- | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http:// www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

testing 1 2 3
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

bleh

1 0

New Topical Pain Reliever for Arthritis, Burns, etc.
by linia32＠earthlink.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Sorry for the intrusion. You won't get another message like this one. If you're not interested in our offer, we apologize for the inconvenience. ========================================================== L'APRINA IS A LIQUEFIED TOPICAL ASPIRIN. SPRAY IT ON WHERE IT HURTS! IT REALLY WORKS! SUPERIOR PAIN RELIEF IN MINUTES FROM A REVOLUTIONARY TOPICAL PAIN RELIEVER THAT DOES NOT DISTURB THE DIGESTIVE SYSTEM AND HAS NO ADVERSE SIDE EFFECTS A PROVEN ANALGESIC AND ANTI-INFLAMMATORY with Aloe Vera REVOLUTIONARY PAIN RELIEF Do you suffer with aches and pains from headaches, sports injuries, low back discomfort, arthritis, rheumatism, bursitis, or joint pain? These, and many other kinds of pains and discomfort can now safely be treated with a revolutionary, topical pain reliever called L'APRINA. L'APRINA is simply a liquefied, topical aspirin, designed to be applied wherever pain occurs. Many people will say it is not possible to get pain relief from an external product; they say that true pain relievers-analgesics - have to be swallowed to be effective. Up to now, they were right, because all the other external pain relievers on the market did not do much except "disguised the pain" by warming or cooling the area where applied. However, L'APRINA is truly different. It works, and it works fast to relieve all kinds of pain that people normally experience. Best of all since you do not ingest it, L'APRINA has none of the side effects associated with aspirin and other pain relievers that are taken internally. L'Aprina's main active ingredient is acetylsalicylic acid (commonly known as aspirin). It also contains extract from the Aloe Vera plant. Using a special and highly secret formula, L'Aprina effectively combines the analgesic power of aspirin with the humectant properties of Aloe Vera to produce pain killing and anti-inflammatory action superior to any other external product. NO SIDE EFFECTS Everybody knows there are lots of drugs and other products out there that will relieve pain The big problem with all of them is that they have to be taken orally, which means that they have to work through the digestive system and the blood stream, and enter every organ and tissue of the body. For many people, this leads to stomach or intestional distress from internal pain relievers, as well as more serious, long term effects to their health. Before L'APRINA the adverse side effects from internal pain relievers were something you simply had to accept - there was no effective alternative, However, with the arrival of L'APRINA people now have a wonderful alternative to the treatment of pain. L'APRINA is healther and safer because only a minuscule amount enters the blood or organs of the body - and there are no adverse side effects. With L'APRINA if you have an injured foot, arthritis in your arms, or an aching back, you can get quick relief by applying it where it hurts and rubbing it in. No longer do you have to swallow a pain reliever, putting medicine in your stomach, kidneys, heart and liver just to get relief from a headache, or pain in your feet, back, or arm, This revolutionary, but sinple, idea is what L'APRINA is all about. EASY AND FAST RELIEF L'APRINA is easy to apply with either its roll-on, squeeze or spray applicator. We recommend the painful area be doused liberally, then gently massaged until dry. This procedure should be repeated two or three times, depending on how sever the pain is. Do not worry about over use - you can't overdose with L'APRINA. L'APRINA begins to relieve even the worst discomfort in minutes. You should begin to experience almost immediate relief after using L'APRINA and its analgesic action normally last six hours, and often longer. In addition, when used daily, L'APRINA often has a powerful cumulative effect, which allows many people to use less L'APRINA, less often, for continued pain relief. New uses for L'APRINA are being discovered everyday. In addition to the severe pain discomfort from broken bones, shingles, burns, migraine headaches, and the like L'APRINA is great for those discomforts people experience from sunburn, insect bites and strained muscles, just to name a few. Keep a bottle in your office, home and car at all times. The compact roll-on bottle is perfect for purses and briefcases. Be sure to use L'APRINA on your children for those cuts, scrapes and bruises all children seem to get, L'APRINA IS SAFER and HEALTHER than any oral pain medication you can buy. WE ARE ACCEPTING APPLICATIONS FOR DEALERSHIPS. JIMMIE A. MARTIN, ID#353854976 WILL BE PLEASED TO SPONSOR YOU. TO GET AN APPLICATION SEND AN EMAIL TO jimmie(a)freeyellow.com or Call 1-800-631-9824 and tell them you were referred by Jimmie A. Martin AS AN INDEPENDENT DISTRIBUTOR YOU BUY WHOLESALE AND SELL RETAIL AND YOU CAN ARRANGE FOR AUTOMATIC MONTHLY SHIPMENTS WITHOUT SHIPPING CHARGES. Even if you are not interested in a dealership you may sign up as a preferred customer and purchase L'APRINA at wholesale prices. Again, send an email to jimmie(a)freeyellow.com for your application. If you prefer to just order L'APRINA by the bottle the the retail prices* are: 1-ounce Squeeze Bottle $5.95 + $1.50 S&H (First Class Mail) 2-ounce Roll-on Bottle $13.95 + $1.96 S&H (First Class Mail) 4-ounce Spray Bottle $19.95 + $3.95 S&H (Priority Mail) * plus sales tax where applicable Send your order vai turtle mail to the address below and make you check payable to Jimmie A. Martin, YES, L'APRINA IS FDA APPROVED. Jimmie A. Martin 8749 SW 115th Street Ocala, FL 34481-5091

1 0

Re: Stronghold
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dimitri and Cloned Anonymees continued the rotten-egging of Stronghold faults: If there's a fault in Stronghold, expose it, in detail, for merely proclaiming there is, is sour grapes commercial knocking of a superior product, or worse, evidence of complicity with those dark forces who want to prevent global spread of strong products. Sniff that rhetoric. It's the same old Backdoor gossip, as with PGP (freeware version, not the latest Freehware, which is evil, evil, how could you Phil?). Using the threat of a lawsuit as grounds to prevent disclosure is shrewd way of avoiding having to document an allegation. Dimitri, you're one smart son of a bitch, and my hat off to your genius at the dirty business of defamation, no holds barred. Defaming an eating-your-lunch competitor is fair play, as C2 shows how to call your bluff with a bullshit legal bluff. Anybody with a reliable info on a hidden backdoor in Stronghold or Dimitri or me, as with PGP, should get the evidence out for verification. Otherwise, such ranting is just trash talk of the bluffing game. Dimitri, out with Stronghold's fault, if you've got it. C2, cut the legal bluff, it stinks. The badmouthing by both of you is the same old toxic waste -- and may mean the two of you're are now in cahoots to boost each other's shoddy goods and hide the faults behind a phony dispute, like 50 years of mock competitive Ameri-Russky junk national security communist-capitalist racketeering so beloved by die-hard globalist TLAs of business and government. And I'm eager to rotten-egg it onward.

1 0

Re: Stronghold
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Anonymous wrote: | C2 is obviously deperate to suppress the information that's already known to | an increasing number of people in the field. Their threats against Vulis may | be one of the reasons why none of the security experts, who confirmed the | presense of serious security flaws in Stronghold, are saying much about this. The information regarding the security flaws in Stronghold comes at a pretty dear price currently. With the increasing value of this type of information in the corporate underworld, the bugs and backdoors in security software that are revealed to the world make up only a small portion of those that are known to exist by those who have the funds to purchase them. For every free spirit who publishes a security flaw, there are a dozen enterpreneurs who recognize the value of the information they hold. MoneyMonger

1 0

Re: Stronghold
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

John Young wrote: > Dimitri, out with Stronghold's fault, if you've got it. C2, cut the > legal bluff, it stinks. The badmouthing by both of you is the same old > toxic waste -- and may mean the two of you're are now in cahoots > to boost each other's shoddy goods and hide the faults behind a > phony dispute, like 50 years of mock competitive Ameri-Russky > junk national security communist-capitalist racketeering so beloved > by die-hard globalist TLAs of business and government. It is becoming increasingly obvious that John Young is the real troublemaker here. I wouldn't doubt that it was John who was behind the original troubles between Vulis and Sameer. I think that John Young should be forcefully unsubscribed from the Cypherpunks mailing lists. YoungMonger

5 5

Re: Quor's cipher
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Antonomasia <ant(a)notatla.demon.co.uk> wrote: > This cypher is constructed differently from RC4 or fish - not as simple as > WAKE but broadly comparable to Sapphire II. I think I'll enlist the help > of a search engine. It's more than likely there other things waiting to > be done to this. It seems to be roughly a cross between a stream cypher and a block cypher. Search engine turned up absolutely nothing on this. > Quor's friend 'nobody' has actually put some crypto on > the list -let's see what we can do with/to it. An actual crypto post on a cryptography list? How unusual.... ;-)

1 0