December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

IP: Huge Philly Terrorist Drill Yesterday
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: believer(a)telepath.com Subject: IP: Huge Philly Terrorist Drill Yesterday Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 09:32:52 -0500 To: believer(a)telepath.com Source: Chicago Tribune http://chicagotribune.com/news/nationworld/article/0,1051,SAV-9809170173,00. html HUGE SIMULATED TERRORIST ATTACK AIMED AT PUTTING CITY ON GUARD From Tribune News Services September 17, 1998 PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA -- The Army on Wednesday gave Philadelphia's law-enforcement and rescue crews a daylong taste of what it might be like if terrorists unleashed deadly Sarin nerve gas during a civic luncheon for 1,500 people. Sirens shattered the calm of Philadelphia's Fairmount Park as hundreds of police, firefighters and federal troops rushed to the aid of city workers acting out their parts as victims of the attack. "You can't predict an Oklahoma City. You can't predict what happened in Tokyo. And you can't predict what happened in New York," Army Col. Richard Breen shouted over the roar of fire engines. "It's better to be proactive and train people so that a city like Philadelphia can take . . . care of its citizens if, God forbid, something like this really were to occur." The drill was part of a Defense Department program to train cities to cope with chemical, biological and nuclear terrorism. The exercise, the biggest yet to be staged by the Army Chemical and Biological Defense Command, involved beat officers, bomb-disposal experts, hazardous-material teams, firefighters, ambulance crews, National Guardsmen, federal emergency managers, FBI agents, the Coast Guard and the American Red Cross. Organizers refused to say how many people took part. "We would not want to broadcast . . . just what our personnel and equipment strengths would be to meet this type of emergency," a city official said. Later this month in a similar exercise, the Army plans to simulate another Sarin attack on a music concert at RFK Stadium in Washington. ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

IP: Terrorism is Shifting Threat to U.S.
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: believer(a)telepath.com Subject: IP: Terrorism is Shifting Threat to U.S. Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 17:36:29 -0500 To: believer(a)telepath.com Source: USIA http://www.usia.gov/current/news/latest/98091706.plt.html?/products/washfile /newsitem.shtml 17 September 1998 U.S. OFFICIALS SEE TERRORISM AS A SHIFTING THREAT TO NATION (State Department, congressional experts outline views) (700) By Ralph Dannheisser USIA Congressional Correspondent Washington -- A State Department official and a congressman outlined the changing face of terrorism before a business group, and warned that it poses increasing concerns for Americans at home and abroad. Gordon Gray, director for regional affairs in State's counterterrorism office and Representative Jim Saxton, a New Jersey Republican, were among the speakers at a briefing for business leaders September 17 sponsored by Equity International, Inc. Gray told the group that "the good news is the decline in state terrorism." But, he quickly added, "the bad news is the same thing -- the decline in state terrorism." That seeming contradiction comes into play, Gray said, because "the decline in state sponsorship poses new problems, as we see more and more loosely knit organizations" like that headed by Saudi Arabian businessman Usama bin Ladin -- groups that by their nature are harder to get at. Bin Ladin is thought to have been behind the recent bombing of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania. Gray portrayed a mixed picture with respect to terrorist activity. On the one hand, he said, "last month's bombings at the two U.S. embassies and in Northern Ireland "painfully reinforce the dangers posed by terrorists," whose "attacks are becoming far more lethal in recent years," -- even as the critical infrastructure in our increasingly sophisticated society "becomes that much more vulnerable." But at the same time, Gray observed, "There are some positive signs." For example, he reported, the total number of terrorist incidents in 1996 and 1997 fell to a 25-year low. "It's important that we not exaggerate what the actual threat is. That's exactly what terrorists want to do" to intimidate their foes, he said. Gray cited four pillars of U.S. policy with respect to terrorism: -- a strict refusal to grant concessions to terrorists; -- a determination to apply the rule of law; -- steps to help friendly countries increase their capabilities to combat terrorism, and -- a continuing effort to put pressure on state sponsors of terrorism as well as the terrorists themselves. Would-be terrorists must be convinced that "our memories are long, our capabilities are strong," he said. Saxton, chairman of the House Task Force on Terrorism and Unconventional Warfare, told the audience of business executives there has been a distinct change in the use of terrorism in the decade of the 1990s. The United States demonstrated to foes, most notably in the Gulf War, that "our conventional capability was rather overwhelming," and so "the same group of nations with the same long term agenda had to find different ways to carry out and achieve their objectives," he said. He named Iran, Iraq, Libya, Sudan, Pakistan and North Korea as "hotbeds of international terrorist activity." And, Saxton said, it is "an unfortunate fact of life" that many terrorist nations "are beginning to avail themselves of technology that we generally refer to as weapons of mass destruction." A real threat now exists of attacks on American cities, perhaps using nuclear devices, he warned. While most Americans outside Washington have not paid much attention to the threat, it is "something we have to do for our own survival," he said. Saxton rejected the notion that bin Ladin is operating independently. "Bin Ladin is a puppet....He is paid big money to carry out acts of terrorism by the leaders of Iran, Iraq, Syria, Pakistan, Sudan, Libya," he declared. Asked why Pakistan is not on the State Department's list of terrorist states, he responded, "I can tell you they're on our (the task force's) list. We believe they're a major sponsoring state. We believe that they are one of the more dangerous sponsoring states." But the Department has resisted efforts to classify the country as such, he noted. Saxton contended that state sponsors of terrorism are spending more than $500 million a year on "groups like Hamas and the Islamic Jihad" -- organizations that he said get their funding from drug traffic, counterfeiting and "contributions from Islamist fundamentalist groups around the world" in addition to direct government payments. ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

IP: ID proposal raises privacy concerns
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: believer(a)telepath.com Subject: IP: ID proposal raises privacy concerns Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 17:30:47 -0500 To: believer(a)telepath.com Source: Fox News - AP ID proposal raises privacy concerns 2.15 p.m. ET (1816 GMT) September 17, 1998 WASHINGTON (AP) Lawmakers raised loss-of-privacy objections Thursday to a proposal that would use Social Security numbers to help curb the number of illegal immigrants who unlawfully get government benefits. The proposal by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration would require federal agencies to accept, as proof of identity, a driver's license that conforms to certain standards. A Social Security number would be among the requirements. Rep. David McIntosh, R-Ind., said the measure "appears to create a de facto national ID card'' for all Americans. "With a Social Security number, anyone can find out almost anything about an individual on the Internet, including where he or she lives,'' said McIntosh, who chairs the House Government Reform and Oversight's subcommittee on national economic growth. "This technology gives stalkers and abusers easy access to their victims.'' During a committee hearing on the proposal, Celene Cross described how someone fraudulently used her name and Social Security number to obtain credit cards and rack up more than $17,000 in charges. Cross said she has spent three years trying to clear her credit history but problems continue to arise, and "I have just quit applying for credit altogether.'' Marvin Young, another panel witness, told lawmakers how a former roommate used his Social Security number to assume his identity and open more than 40 charge cards. "I've worked hard and never made a late payment in my life, but this other guy has just messed up everything for me,'' Young said. In a statement submitted to the committee, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said its proposal is intended to "prevent the use of state driver's licenses and other identification documents by illegal immigrants seeking to obtain benefits under federal programs.'' © 1998 Associated Press. All rights reserved. ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

Re: about hacking win95 passwords
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

David Parkinson wrote: > > hello, > > my name is david parkinson > > i have taken a document of an ftp on how to hack win95 passwords > > your email address was on it. in the part where it says here is a > > guick hack and then this is what it shows C source snipped. > i have no idea what that means and how it can help me hack win95 > > passwords. > > if u could help we with this it would be greatly appreciated Go to a bookstore and buy an introductory book on C programming. It might cost as much as $50, but it is more than worth your while if you are planning on messing with cryptography and cracking like this. Once you have the book, read it and then try to analyze the source code. If you are dealing with and using Windows, you will need a C compiler. Cygnus has a free Win32 C compiler out as I understand it, and Microsoft and Borland both have C compilers out for a few hundred bucks each. If you are dealing with UNIX, there is tons of source and free development utilities out there.

1 0

Re: Stego-empty hard drives...
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Robert Hettinga wrote: > At 1:01 AM -0400 on 9/19/98, Anonymous wrote: > > (Had this been a UK Customs 'inspection' of the contents of the disk, I > > might have had to explain the half-gig of "noise" I have on the disk. > > Only, it really is noise. Really.) > > This makes me think of something that I probably missed in the bowels of > someone's long previous stego posting (um, stego^stego? :-)), how would you > go about either: > > Stegoing an encrypted partition as "blank" hard drive space without > actually writing over it unless you wanted to? > > or, even, > > Stegoing an encrypted partition as not even *there* at all? > > > Doesn't seem like it would be too hard conceptually (hah!) and, if done, > might actually defeat such Archie-look-up-the-dress as the British > customsfolk are wont to do these days. > > Obviously, even if the partition were found, it would look, to sniffer > programs, as if it were empty, right? :-). Once they realize people are doing this, they will begin taking hashes or some other record of the blank space. The next time you are scanned by customs, they pull the record and compare the previous "blank" space with the current "blank" space. If they don't match, you're suspect. They still cannot prove that you're carrying hidden data. They ask you if you know what stego is. They ask you if you have hidden data on your drive. If you say yes, they demand to see it. If you say no, they say "Okay, then it should be no problem if we push the wipe button on our program, should it?" If they start doing that they have still won, because now you are not carrying the data across the border or the data is destroyed as you cross the border.

2 1

ArcotSign (was Re: Does security depend on hardware?)
by Ryan Lackey 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

[from a discussion of tamper-resistant hardware for payment systems on dbs(a)philodox.com, a mailing list dedicated to digital bearer systems, where Scott Loftesness, of DigiCash and Arcot Systems, mentioned ArcotSign.] You mentioned the URL for Arcot, and I looked at the site. It seems rather lacking in technical details, and makes a very strong claim -- that it can provide tamper resistance in software on a hardware/OS/etc. platform which is generally hostile (a general purpose computer). I noticed that there are some big name cryptographers signed on as advisors -- Hellman and Schneier, who make some pretty glowing comments about the product. I'm not generally swayed by anything but mathematics, physics, and logic when it comes to cryptography and security, despite generally agreeing with the analyses of those cryptographers. I can see a couple of ways you could approximate real security using untrusted hardware -- either a one time password system retained by the user (I've investigated this in the past, and it generally ends up being a hardware token or a printed book of codes), or a remote system like Kerberos where there exist out of band key protection mechanisms, or it's not real security. I'd love to be convinced otherwise, particularly if the technology will be available for others to license. I also noticed that the system is patent pending -- this would seem to rule out the existing hardware token/one time pad system, or the Kerberos-style central authentication server releasing security credentials when presented with a passphrase system, as there are decades of prior art in each encompassing all reasonable variations. I guess this means it's something new and interesting -- I'm sure everyone would be interested in details. Of course, in any system where all you do is authenticate yourself to a remote system, but you're not provided with a link directly between the user and the remote authority guaranteeing Confidentiality, Integrity, and Authentication, you can't really make any claims other than that the user has authenticated herself to some server -- any transactions the user could do are subject to a man in the middle attack, so while the user has successfully authenticated themselves to a remote server, and signed that *some* transaction is acceptable, there's really no legal assurance that the user has signed *any particular transaction*. This is far weaker than the promise of trusted hardware, where you could have a guarantee that as long as the protocol hasn't been violated, the user has authorized a *particular* transaction. This may be acceptable for authenticating access to an online retail banking web site, or corporate information, but it would not be sufficient for an actual payment system (DBS, account based, or other). Always interested in learning something new which would chance my assumptions, Ryan rdl(a)mit.edu

15 33

Re: IP: School bans `no rules' T-shirt
by lcs Mixmaster Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is more evidence of government trying to indoctrinate children. We have the Pledge of Sheepegience, students encouraged to pressure anyone who doesn't conform, school uniforms, clear backpacks, metal detectors, kids being expelled for having asprin, and now students being "free" to wear anything with a message, so long as it's a government-approved message. On Sat, 19 Sep 1998, Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote: > From: believer(a)telepath.com > Subject: IP: School bans `no rules' T-shirt > Date: Thu, 17 Sep 1998 09:25:30 -0500 > To: believer(a)telepath.com > > Source: St. Paul, Minnesota Pioneer Planet News > http://www.pioneerplanet.com/news/wis_docs/010832.htm > > Published: Thursday, September 17, 1998 > > School bans `no rules' T-shirt > > ASSOCIATED PRESS > > WAUKESHA, WIS. > > A fifth grader was ordered to turn his T-shirt inside-out because it > carried the message ``No Rules,'' which the principal said promoted > disruptive behavior. What difference does it make? Schools aren't teaching kids to read anyway. Obviously, they're still learning. I suggest that we ban all literacy right now! It allows people to read disruptive texts! Fahrenheit 451 forever! Ra ra ra! > But the youth's mother said Saratoga Elementary School principal Dale > Heinen overstepped his bounds and that there was no harm in wearing such > shirts, which depict cartoon characters and carry the slogan, ``Outta my > way. No Rules.'' One would think that the fact that it's being worn by a fifth grader, and that it has cartoon characters on it would tend to make it more of a joke than anything else. > > Heinen made Cody Wilhelm wear the shirt inside-out so no one could read its > message. I guess that the kids of today aren't smart enough to read backwards either. > > ``School guidelines talk about things that are disruptive and can lead to > disruption,'' Heinen said. ``If they are portraying that in what they wear > . . . we don't want kids reflecting that attitude or promoting that type of > attitude.'' Yes. You only want them to promote attitudes which cover the government seal of approval. > Mary Wilhelm said her son's T-shirt was not disruptive and that parents > should have the right to dress their children with any clothes they want to > as long as they do not promote sex, drugs, alcohol, tobacco or illegal > activities. Oh, I get it. "Freedom for me, but not for thee." She's basically bitching because she wasn't given the decision about what rights to abridge. The funny thing about these people hating sex is that they do it, and if people don't do it the species dies. The downright sad thing about the "illegal activities" comment is that just about everything is illegal now, but she's too stupid to realize it. > She said her son went to school last year wearing one of the ``No Rules'' > T-shirts and also wore a T-shirt depicting ``Joe Camel,'' a cartoon > character formerly used to promote Camel cigarettes. School officials did > not object, she said. Wait! I thought Mary Wilhelm said that "parents should have the right to dress their children with any clothes they want to as long as they do not promote sex, drugs, alcohol, TOBACCO..." > ``He should have never worn that Joe Camel shirt, I agree, but that dealt > with smoking,'' Wilhelm said. As opposed to "illegal activities." Well, at least as the school claims. > ``This is different. I don't want to have the principal tell me what I can > and can't do with my kid.'' But you want to be able to tell everybody else what they can and can't do with their's. People like this disgust me. That includes the principal and the mother.

1 0

Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd)
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Jim Choate wrote: > > nobody(a)remailer.ch wrote: > > Subject: Re: Clinton's fake apologies (fwd) > > > Presumably he should lie to protect the state. > > Then don't take the oath: > > To tell the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. > ... > > So lieing per se isn't the problem. > > No, it's the fact that he took an oath to tell the truth and didn't. > > > Murky water > > for impeachment, methinks. > > Then you don't think very well. > What? To tell a lie is one thing, but if you preface it with "I'm telling the truth", then that is really really bad? I still think you're drawing a very fine line. I'm honoured to draw an ad hominem before revealing that I'm on AOL. -- an anonymous aol32 user.

2 1

Re: A question from Seattle
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Sat, 19 Sep 1998, Thompson, Christopher W NWS <Christopher.W.Thompson(a)NWS02.usace.army.mil> sent to the Cypherpunks list, a haven for the freedom loving, alot of cryptographers, and those of non-Freeh thinking: > > hey, I'm a 28 year old living in Seattle and I've been having quite the > fantasy of watching and or participating in father/son activities...or big > brother and little brother interaction. Do you have any suggestions > where/who I might contact in the Seattle metro area? > > Thanks > > You can start with your CO and the FBI. I'm forwarding this to them for your convenience. It's all part of the service.

1 0

Toto knows how to make a 0xdeadbeef attack?
by Adam Back 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

As a result of my trawl through my cypherpunks archive last week looking for publically posted private keys by Toto et al, I grepped out a selection of encrypted messages sent to the list. I thought I'd have a go at decrypting these with the selection of passphrases John Young posted earlier today, in case any were encrypted with the publically posted keys, or with a conventional encryption key. I came across this post [1] posted in 5 Sep 97 which contains this encrypted message, and "challenge" to decrypt it. Now if you try to decrypt it, it says you need key 0xE6A9C799, the public key for which is on the key servers. However keyids are actually stored as 64 bits, internally to PGP messages, but only the least significant 32 bits are displayed by PGP normally. I use pgpacket to look at things and it gives you all 64 bits, the message has keyid: 0xAA33463CE6A9C799 however the key I got off the keyserver [2] has keyid: 0xAA33063CE6A9C799 which differs by 0x400000000000 or one bit. That would require knowing how to create a 0xdeadbeef key or at least use software to do this, if it is available. Unless the bit flip is part of the "challenge". Who knows. Toto did allude to hacking skills, though largely claimed ignorance. I wonder if this was feigned, or if there are other Totos who are doing the key hacks etc. eg this challenge out of bureau42.ml.org remailer. Toto is a one man computer crypto forensics persons full-employment insurance! -- the amount of stuff posted to the list with various passwords, keys, etc. The IRS guys must be either hiring some one who knows crypto, or are going to be seriously confused at this point. Then there's the use of S-Tools, they must be going boggle eyed guessing passphrases for S-Tools for all the images ever posted anonymously, or pseudonymously to the list. One wonders almost if this was his aim. Any hints Toto(s)? Firstly I haven't got the private key(s) for 0xAA33[0|4]63CE6A9C799, and secondly, what's the deal with the bit flips/0xdeadbeef attacks? My september forward secret key is below [3]. It is authenticated by my high security key, and 12 days time or so, the private key gets wiped. Adam [1] ====================================================================== Date: Fri, 5 Sep 1997 17:31:53 GMT From: bureau42 Anonymous Remailer <remailer(a)bureau42.ml.org> Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at <remailer-admin(a)bureau42.ml.org>. Subject: EFF $10,000,0000 Challenge To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com Sender: owner-cypherpunks(a)Algebra.COM Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: cypherpunks(a)algebra.com X-List-Admin: ichudov(a)algebra.com X-Loop: cypherpunks(a)algebra.com The Electronic Forgery Foundation is proud to announce a major breakthrough in encryption technology -- Forged Encryption. We are offering a prize of $10,000,000.00 for anyone who can correctly decipher the following Forged Encryption message. -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 MessageID: od2CIT3fELE7K6bkIkKGJBj0MPUJ2TT8 hQCMA6ozRjzmqceZAQQAh02x0Dxer5vzZiSJ+v7bnMZQdgp425z5OH0NF/f/mXXc vInw+UsuTXqWNEV5rEQKYjU3qHoe6suCz5f9hEEnOIBacsD28pYU4ahkGOCTuTY6 N3xKrtDRqLPInB8PY7Kfd56jjQsVVRKmJBwXqHbPax4YyUB6ZbKKvSPiuUsAAQSl BAH3CFNKcmYjf+VtpjAVOpDNM/PMm1e6m33rZ01Sq6pXC0TTabCf7hkWscet0PCL VX0l1Zw5IKaFqo+pZ3EICRMF6HQrc30G7L9TFeKr//3YsO3/bC4VBgNQHA0qf2nD ldxAsTGPlRthBTxrzE0LjeOKi/pQOLXQMPQUwEIaL9rncjFgniplFoL6Nj0guJvW VvS+gxth8hpeWss7WlFFioV0vShsS/lahA+eg/9nVy8ken8pr4m484w2vwoiSdce CarVigVaRh6tCgh0jub7CHuDFg== =Q9+G -----END PGP MESSAGE----- The EFF doesn't have a copy of the correct answer locked away in a secret underground cave in Tibet, for verification, because the above Forged Encryption message is just a bunch of crap we typed in pretty much at random. Does the government want to keep your private key in escrow? Give them a copy of your EFF private key. Hell, give them _two_ copies, in case one is corrupted.{;>) Smile when you give them to the government agent. Ask him how his day has been. Offer him some coffe, and ask about his family. Tell him you will send him a Christmas card with another copy of your EFF private key, just in case the government misplaces the copies you gave them. Put your hand over your heart, salute the flag, and sing "God Bless America" as the government agent leaves. Then fart. Use the EFF Forged Encryption sofware regularly, to send messages with Subject:'s like "The Plot Against the PREZ," "Confirmation of the date of our armed assault," "The Nuke has arrived." Keep a copy of your EFF Forged Encryption secret key in a directory named "Off the Pigs." Most importantly, never reveal in your private email to others that you are a deaf, dumb and blind quadraplegic who has been homebound since birth. That way, the outrageous claims that government agents make against you in their secret deposition for a warrant to kick in your door and terrorize you will look all the more foolish during your trial. We at the Electronic Forgery Foundation realize that some of you wise guys are thinking that, for $10 million, it is well worth your while to write a program that will decipher the above message into something meaningful. Well, knock yourself out, dudes, but if you think that known forgers couldn't possibly be lying about the $10 million, then go directly to http://www.clueserver/fucking_idiot, do not pass GO and do not collect $200. --------------------------------------------------------------------- This message is copyrighted under the auspices of the Electronic Forgery Foundation. Any misquoting, misrepresentation, or other abuse of this message would be greatly appreciated. Hell, you can tell people you wrote it, if you want to. We don't really care. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [2] (long)keyid 0xAA33063CE6A9C799 (Toto <toto(a)sk.sympatico.ca>) -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 5.0 Comment: PGP Key Server 0.9.3-db2test mQCNAzMs140AAAEEAL1CAoB5pd97hIOoT6L0v05Ov8nw0unf0db6NXZ91EJAyq9p DoPGJl7Z6m5McIsNI2DrCEEt7KYdt0ZIGcqqK2gmCePYI0oQOFj+jznI3jKXg1k2 R+ngk+cUn21EfrNXFGPk1Tuc1/3Qib6cX6BZRJvvz1FNYNt/zqozBjzmqceZAAUR tBtUb3RvIDx0b3RvQHNrLnN5bXBhdGljby5jYT6JAJUDBRAzgrFaG9qyus40wB0B AeagA/47sR2GW3y/e3z63ZHqvZwsrNZabNtVsLU6QoEfomfOc0ViI+RY3w5dAjQI 62zCSj/DXaLEwYGNbqVcwjlos5STdoxFqRHpHf6hLCZSNjUaIqY19n0U0qTs6Hw4 WuRURrbMLJYVEgiZpRynmMPnwQ+1USQ1MV6MevboXeJ08lHoDYkAlQIFEDM9HqMi iRpDQSB+5QEBHJYD/0/VRUy8EAZdjjzx/82+zUJmen9rRI3EQtd+kzInP9V13ZG5 qFFihznQJukXX9A53g9l4RbZo1P+yHF+bdD3OnEbPIWDL/+0Rd3DZp53N1Pigw6A MGoyvNzYt83zNaoXlxYksBIirBusiSbJlHotQLGYTv1aaBGVAYAd8zDALdYtiQA/ AwUQM4KBc4I3FG4quJ9UEQLr0QCdFQDsbIKVKU6f5olwRSACnq/YtJoAnig/jD9Q c8CVTPsw++ok1kWZeqXViQCVAwUQM4J+6pfboLn8NWjNAQGTigQAnrFZ8OiAguWq i1LsClKo0t9y+Ly98EPnpBt2FgQN9/Z8PSZjPqEn9AJk7Z5TBhGJNXBmkULiuNA9 zvGTsRM0S7Oi6/WFUcL9rio6gMsxTnDythGaFa5YDQXgXtFxqcjsojGhe922KFnV i4xxatO9vm9Zo3JaNAK8zvg2rIrd7VSJAJUDBRAzgn8PsF+MkGb7jGUBAYbmBACV tqTdmo9Zu/e9hpEL1FQXnp1qzKilzchxf+9/mBmbCy6O/QKVkdUTptkYMVyUHh0q 1KJV4caZIx3vQyeRsK7Fe5vex38LzN9lcP99lOE9Y8nns1bwaiUONe1McWEtkEkG SMi3FaIxRCb4f5ENjRV8EzydQbHD5+Pyp0+gw9LuXIkBFQMFEDOC1g34yQH5HnUh EwEBoHAH/RDpelRJCSEtRC7upHwGbfuZL3RhlgXomiOL5plSn2i2El7hm1k1UKcG UHvcz1ni2deWRK/qLle9xN8wXIjZMATWJLfeSoSpZoq8yFKdN+r2fkpwyN4h6hmb SI0DBm73eiO7cIRgxszpQDnI5uhTp083JUX/dtFlBMtr/XsIBfg6PN6pYYIAZ1cn pqkKHHFpdJe3+/AIHzw53nJUKm8EX+Bui1EOfljB63U6oP+Q1F3Wo0C1PaN/9Hbo 3IkVSLC1i3JUQwjh0moFuB+ZeLUFTxBwp+F2Y1AcvQT6JJW529WPTXOvfT2/+wU7 uVaynaHMum8snzPWMr5v0dQbq+6+OPU= =leOK -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- [3] Type Bits/KeyID Date User ID pub 2048/86B519BD 1998/09/10 Adam Back <aba(a)dcs.ex.ac.uk> (FS key, Sep 98) -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.3i mQENAzX3ILwAAAEIAL368F4iaAlWFsXFUXdgSttJaHpjcLXmqZP93FlhQRyhSco6 6wyTWEa0UQ25ynf/r/sh4Z7/xjD+HSUUCnpLDJnN9143JUO1UbDIGTq3vC+uKJjr 1OnZQMI0SOrpdUUvbz9zyC2Zsj+CACGbX+sFpecT/XxMpSeEbfoNoy5+AWjB7eIa 27qloHFGRZrDfFvewaSybck21PGVEwkTrpBQ4Yf1RGDod+Xe079jq79uZNNDgnTN UaFXFS0BmH0nJmjWE5/QkNsgy0aPuFcR65TKn54Fj7e82g1ScEYlwS3iRBuebpAU pH81flyI4qr9dvBatcpQXut+PxXT+mQxbIa1Gb0ABRO0LUFkYW0gQmFjayA8YWJh QGRjcy5leC5hYy51az4gKEZTIGtleSwgU2VwIDk4KYkBFQMFEDX3IQ0+e8qoKLJF UQEBhH4H/3u1USAlPwbGPMfMwZwBU4uCm6EPf03LKgtGa/elSn8nvrSbRrvLVdnQ aQWJBQpLegUkDlrd0LG9guGdaEJxJ3pZteeaDuC9WeHJWBuUbiyrNooTk7QGeVM1 9yTAW9zaHW/NpXSYL45XfHYuYrKiX50gAY+CSc3rE4Ei++R0gTAwRnS9JkKqsdzP CJThyy+ppteG5d7aw8L26AQQGUvcZKR3wTvGpGAfU6bZo1gmvnloSYelbxvUfkq2 ybHBZWXj7iBRPwTT6przBVp3DaCm8/gOzUBxvJZkoDsbf/iVBX/Qf8sVGq/86ksB /JmE7cAVNveJ+a9wx4kTNVmjP7Aciao= =vpQX -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

1 0