December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Cypherpunks Lite
by youssefy＠ucla.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

There was a posting by someone about three weeks ago that gave the address for a person who ran a filtered version of the cypherpunks list, can someone please repost that information?

1 0

SNAKEOIL? Top Secret for Windows
by frogfarm＠yakko.cs.wmich.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>From: sk510019(a)mail.idt.net (Siva Krishna) Newsgroups: comp.archives.ms-windows.announce Subject: tsecret.zip - TOPSECRET!: Easily encrypts any file. Message-ID: <9608312039.cg4898(a)Simtel.Net> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 1996 20:39:29 GMT I have uploaded to Simtel.Net: http://www.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/win3/security/tsecret.zip ftp://ftp.simtel.net/pub/simtelnet/win3/security/tsecret.zip 12070 bytes tsecret.zip TOPSECRET!: Easily encrypts any file TOPSECRET is a program to encrypt your sensitive files. This program does not use the RSA standard (which is restricted for export). This program uses the aid of a "Catalyst" file (which can be any file) to encrypt another file (any file). The Catalyst acts as a key to code and decode your sensitive files. Of course you can even make your own catalyst by encrypting one file with another. A periodically changing Catalyst can be made by combining 1-Registered mail file 2-Courier file 3-Last message file; This would ensure high security for the transmission of your sensitive files.I am sure you will come up with your own methods. Shareware. Uploaded by the author. Siva Krishna sk510019(a)mail.idt.net -- http://yakko.cs.wmich.edu/~frogfarm ...for the best in unapproved information EmmaGoldmanCamillePagliaMarieCurieAynRandSapphoDianaToriAmosPJHarvey&Demona All generalizations are false, with the exception of this one I feel a groove comin' on | $ | Freedom...yeah, right.

1 0

BOM_ban
by jya＠pipeline.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Thanks to DL for noting this report. 8-31-96. WaPo: "New Airport Bomb Plan Considered. Computer Profiles, High-Tech Detectors Central to System" A presidential commission on aviation security is considering a bomb detection plan that would require U.S. airlines to scrutinize all passengers at U.S. airports using massive computer files to identify potential terrorists or other suspicious individuals. The plan would require creation of a computer profiling system that would examine passengers' bill-paying records, flying habits and much other data to determine which checked baggage should undergo examination by sophisticated explosives detection equipment. Numerous legal issues still need to be resolved, including thorny civil liberties questions such as whether the airlines would be given access to information from government computer systems like those containing criminal records. Would the airlines store information on individuals? Would they go out and seek information from credit bureaus and other private sources? ----- http://jya.com/bomban.txt (10 kb) via anonymizer BOM_ban

1 0

"Douglas R. Floyd" <dfloyd@io.com>: Re: File System Encryption
by patrickbc＠juno.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------- Begin forwarded message ---------- From: "Douglas R. Floyd" <dfloyd(a)io.com> To: drifter(a)c2.net (Drifter) Cc: cypherpunks(a)toad.com Subject: Re: File System Encryption Date: Tue, 27 Aug 1996 09:01:03 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <199608271401.JAA04116(a)xanadu.io.com> > > I'm aware of the three main disk encryption programs SFS, SECDRV, and > SECDEV, but I need to find a solution that works with Windows 95 32bit > or Windows NT 4.0. > > I'm currently using SFS 1.17 and Secure Drive under Win-95, but am > unable to continue to work in dos compatability mode due to severe > performance hits. I am open to commercial products that have passed > peer review, but know of none. > > If anyone could suggest a solution (outside of switching OS's), I > would be *most* gratefull. > > Please respond to the list, as I am a subscriber under another > account. If you have another 386 or 486 lying around, you could install Linux and Ian's encrypted loopback code on a remote box, then NFS or Samba the filesystem over. For protection, you could modify the vlock command to lock the console (and not unlock it), and disable inetd. Then, unless someone has the permissions to access the files through the network, the files are inaccessable ;-). > > The Drifter > --------- End forwarded message ---------- You could find some programers on the net and make a new one that is windows 95 compatible.

1 0

Re: DON'T Nuke Singapore Back into the Stone Age
by stewarts＠ix.netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 10:35 AM 8/31/96 -0700, tcmay(a)got.net (Timothy C. May) wrote: >The point is to make clear to them that the Usenet and similar Web sites >are global in nature, not subject to censorship without a very high local >cost. If discussions of Lee Kwan Yew's dynasty are considered illegal, then >Singaporans will have to choose not to carry the various newsgroups into >which *I* post such messages! [.....] >To be blunt, if Singapore wants to stop me from discussing the dictator Yew >and his feeble son, they can't. Except by pulling the plugs on forums in >which my posts are carried. Or they'll have to implement per-article filtering, whether done by bots (easy to evade) or by humans (normally much harder.) It's easy to have bots get rid of all postings/email/web mentioning Tim May or Klaus von Future Prime, though tougher to do so if you start posting anti-government-slander from your various Tentacles. And they don't have to use humans to filter the whole web - have bots identify any material containing the words "Singapore" or "Yew" and forward it to the humans, though that makes web proxies a bit slow :-) Reuters reports: R>Contents deemed objectionable include those ``which tend to R>bring the government into hatred or contempt, or which excite R>disaffection against the government,'' an SBA statement said Disaffection? Everybody loves Lee Kwan Yew (or else) - he's like a Big Brother to us! # Thanks; Bill # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com # <A HREF="http://idiom.com/~wcs"> Reassign Authority!

1 0

Re: Below-bit-level encoding
by James Erickson 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

how the hell do i get of this list?

2 1

Got to be kidding right?
by pomp pood thai 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 06:54 PM 8/31/96 EDT, patrick b cummings wrote: >I am planning to make a list of hacker's of america and would appreciate >it for your help. please send me your > handle > e-mail address > city, state > (optional) your mailing address > and url > whether or not you would like to recieve hackers list > type of hacking you do >Thank You for your cooperation $ $ See ya soon... $$ $$ $$ $$ | $ $$$oo oo$$ X $ X^^'$$$$$$^^'$ | X | $ $$$ $ XXX^^^$$^^^$$$ X X X ``$$$'' XX^^^'$$'^^^$$ X%X%X $$$$o XXo o$$ o X $$$$$$ $$$ $$$ oOo o$$$$^ `$$$$$$ $$oo$$ o$$$$$$$'^$$^ $$$$$$$ $$$$ $$$$$$$^ X $$$$$$ $$ $$$$$ ^ X $$$$$$oo$$$$ X $$$$$$$$$$^ X o$$$$$$$$$$^ X o$$$$$$$$$^^ X ^$$$$$$$^ X $$$$$$o | ``$$$4$$ ``$$$ $ Tormentia

2 1

Mail OnNet
by Joel McNamara 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

In my never-ending search for the perfect PGP e-mail client, I just stumbled on to a beta of a product put out by FTP Software called Mail OnNet. Unlike the Pronto Secure and Pegasus, this client actually has PGP code (licensed from PGP Inc.) built directly in. No shelling out to DOS! Very nice interface and almost complete idiot-proof encrypting/decrypting/signing. Extremely powerful rules based processing too. Check out: http://www.ftp.com/mkt_info/onnet32/try.htm IMHO, this is getting very close to transparent secure e-mail for the masses. Joel Two notes. (1) It only runs under Win95 and NT. (2) It's ITAR restricted.

2 1

No Subject
by patrickbc＠juno.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I am planning to make a list of hacker's of america and would appreciate it for your help. please send me your handle e-mail address city, state (optional) your mailing address and url whether or not you would like to recieve hackers list type of hacking you do Thank You for your cooperation

4 3

Re: Los Angeles Times article on Helsingius and anon.penet.fi
by loki＠infonex.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 12:45 PM 8/31/96, Declan McCullagh wrote: <SNIP> >Note Esther Dyson's comments: > > "The damage that can be done by anonymity is far bigger" than in > any other medium, said Esther Dyson, chairwoman of the Electronic > Frontier Foundation. "In the end, you need to be able to get at > somebody's identity to enforce accountability, and the question is how > do you also enforce freedom of speech and freedom from prosecution for > unpopular opinions." > <SNIP> Is this the official EFF position on remailers? This strong anti-remailer position needs to be retracted or widely publicized. -Lance ---------------------------------------------------------- Lance Cottrell loki(a)obscura.com PGP 2.6 key available by finger or server. Mixmaster, the next generation remailer, is now available! http://www.obscura.com/~loki/Welcome.html or FTP to obscura.com "Love is a snowmobile racing across the tundra. Suddenly it flips over, pinning you underneath. At night the ice weasels come." --Nietzsche ----------------------------------------------------------

2 1