December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Surprise - Anonymous Journalist Opposes Laundering [2/4]
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Part 2 "Journalistic Secrecy is a Serious Problem" [2/4] [2/4] Taken to the cleaners ["]Un["]fortunately, some of this is not as encouraging as it sounds. For a start, the ["]dirty["] money leaving banks may end up polluting other businesses [MONEY LAUNDERING IS GOOD FOR BUSINESS]. PoLice in Texas say that foreign-exchange bureaux there have been a primary conduit for channelling drug money to and from Mexico. Insurers are also vulnerable. One recent laundering wheeze involves buying single-premium insurance policies with ["]dirty["] money. These are then cashed in early in return for a "clean" cheque from the insurer, or used as collateral for a bank loan. [On the way: Currency Transaction Reports for purchase of insurance policies with cash and Early Redemption Reports for policies held less than 50 years. Insurance agents will be required to report "suspicious" policy holders and report possible "structuring" violations. Then they'll wonder why customers are "shunning" insurance companies.] Even the rising cost of laundering may not be unalloyed good news. It may simply reflect the emergence of a new group of professional launderers who are better at beating the system, and charge more for doing so. [Or as Comrade Clinton would put it, "getting their fair share"] Some poLiceman fear that these experts may soon be using electronic-cash systems to speed up the wash cycle (see box on next page). [See post 4/4] Worse [Better], as old laundering centres close their doors, new ones are opening theirs. The table above [shown below this paragraph] shows the countries that the State Department thinks face a severe money-laundering problem. (Even states with tough anti-laundering rules, such as America and Britain, are listed if their vigilance is considered essential in the global fight against laundering.) The striking thing about the ranking is that it includes islands such as Cyprus, a ["]hive["] of offshore activity for the Russian mafia, and Aruba, a Dutch dependency in the Caribbean, which were not associated with laundering a few years ago. [Translation: Aruba et. al. have always been on their shit list, and now that they've taken out the higher-priority targets e.g. CH and Cayman, the NWO _Microchip Extremists_ are setting their sights on shutting down the lower-yield peripheral sites. (which they've "only just recently discovered" are pro-privacy areas)] Another notable inclusion is Mexico, which the report describes as "the money-laundering haven of choice for initial placement of US currency in the world's financial system". In March, the [criminal] Mexican government unveiled a series of anti-laundering [fig leaf] measures in a belated effort to clean up its reputation. Laundry list "High-priority" laundering centres, March 1997 A B C D Aruba yes . . yes Canada yes yes yes yes Cayman Islands yes yes . yes Colombia yes . . yes Cyprus yes na yes yes [Doesn't indicate differences between Greek and Turkish regs, if any.] Germany yes . . yes Hong Kong yes yes . yes Italy yes yes yes yes Mexico yes . yes . Netherlands yes yes yes yes Netherlands Antilles yes . . yes Nigeria yes . . na Panama . . yes yes Russia . . . . Singapore yes . yes yes Thailand . . . . Turkey . . . . Britain yes yes yes yes United States yes yes yes yes Venezuela yes . yes yes A Banks required (or permitted) to report suspicious transactions. [Communese translation: entry-level bank tellers required (or permitted) to make subjective determinations as to customers' intent and/or state of mind. Required (or permitted) to report people encountered on city streets who may be shunning banks in favor of foreign-exchange houses and cheque-cashing outlets. Development of mind-reading skills mandated by executive order.] B Government permits sharing of seized assets with other governments that assisted the underlying investigation. [Communese translation: Thieves drawing paycheques from extorted proceeds allowed to share stolen goods with accomplices in other jurisdictions. The Legislator/B-Crat/Snitch/Judge motto: "We Know Em When We Seize Um"] C Non-banks must meet same anti-laundering provisions as banks. [Communese translation: The woman with an appearance approximating the Wicked Witch of the West sitting behind the .357 Magnum resistant plastic that slips you 10,000,000 Bongonian bellylints in exchange for 10 euros is also a deputized collectivist agent/informant.] D Financial institutions and employees who provide otherwise confidential data to investigators pursuing authorized investigations are protected from prosecution. [Communese translation: Deputized Government Agents/Informants (that is, anyone with whom you exchange legal tender bank notes, a.k.a. "dirty" money) who provide "otherwise confidential" data so that "authorized investigators" may empty your bank account are not accomplices to looters with sovereign immunity.] Source: US Department of State (International Narcotics Control Strategy Report) [Source: Illegitimate Spawn of Hegel (Global Currency Confiscation Strategy Report)] [Notice again that the less fiscally totalitarian states are those actively engaged in recalling their worthless currencies, forbidding (in theory) their domestic hostages from sending capital abroad, forbidding (in theory) holding gold or using other means of protection from criminal governments, defaulting on foreign loans and various shenanigans in a similar vein. From this it can be concluded that for those on the outside looking in, chronic economic mismanagement and chaos are not necessarily a negative, these areas provide excellent entry points in the "rewire-chain"...] In the future, more Asian countries could be added to the list. Rick McDonell [, looter ], the FATF's representative [of Satan] in Asia, warns that the region is ["]vulnerable["] to laundering because many of its economies are heavily cash-based. [Solution: go hire Jerry Seinfeld, Patrick Stewart and all the other convenience-card whores to shill for the cashless society in Bangkok, Guangzhou and Kuala Lumpur?] Moreover, some countries such as India and Pakistan have large "underground" banking systems which sit alongside official ones [hawala]. Usually based on family or regional networks, these shift large amounts of money [and other stored units of value, e.g. crates of Avtomat Kalashnikova, "illegal" cash crops, RPGs, precious stones] around anonymously and cheaply. [25-28% markup indeed! Forget that rubbish] Such attractions, plus a lack of anti-laundering legislation, have already turned Thailand into a launderers' paradise. A report published last year [yet another report, this journalist needs to get out into the real world, hanging with fiscal bureaucrats and professors is stunting Anon-E-Communists' growth] by Bangkok's Chulalongkorn University put the amount of money washing through the country each year at 730 billion baht ($28.5 billion). This is equivalent to 15% of Thai GDP. [In future watch for the following commercials to be run in these vulnerable-to-laundering cash-based-economy television markets: (Jackie Chan dubbed in various local dialects) Amarakan Sexpress - don weave shantytown witoutit VIZA - accep at FinSEN office wowide MassaCard - it's swave money] > E-Communist > 25 St James's Street > London SW1A 1HG > www.economist.com Fly low S'n'S Pro: Money Laundering, Self-Medication, Militia-Grade Arms, Realism Pro: Indirect Taxation, Adults, Individual Irrevocable Rights } Smurf N Sniff Non-Member, Gunfiscators of Canberra | } P.O. Bunker 6669 "We don't want to be like those paranoid | } Hohoe, Ghana Americans, this is a social DemoBracy." | } fn-fal(a)edict.gov.un +233 55 1234 boycott GovernMedia NLC | Anti: feral guVermin, Vooters, rapacious tyrants, nihilists Anti: biometric herd management, "(The)" children, state granted privileges

1 0

REMOVE
by anonymous304＠juno.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On 9 Jan 1998 22:41:02 GMT m2cresumes(a)earthlink.net writes: >NOT a job site, NOT a search engine, NOT a career board, NOT a >newsgroup >AND we do NOT limit you to a single database! > >U S Resume is a true technological leap. It allows subscribers access >the OVER 1 MILLION resumes on the ENTIRE INTERNET (source: Electronic >Recruiting Index, Dec. 1996). It finds your candidates and also >downloads their resumes to your hard drive all automatically, so you >can browse them later with NO Internet wait time. You gain access to >the same "virtual robotics" technology used by our Fortune 500 >clients, enabling you to spend less time looking for qualified >candidates and more time placing them. > >Prices start as low as $295 per month, no more than an ordinary job >board and less than just one typical help wanted display ad. > >Why not have the ENTIRE INTERNET as your own PERSONAL DATABASE? > >For additional information please visit us at http://www.usresume.com > >If the site doesn't answer all your questions, please don't hesitate >to call Dave Weltman or Jeff Eisenberg at 914-627-2600. > >Thanks! > >P.S If you would like to be added to our DO NOT EMAIL LIST, please >reply to this message with the word REMOVE in the Subject of your >reply. When our Robot finds the word REMOVE in the Subject of any >message, it will automatically add the senders email address to our DO >NOT EMAIL LIST. > > >

1 0

Eureka! Fri Jan 9 '98
by eureka＠eureka.abc-web.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Welcome to Friday's issue of Eureka! KARA'S ADULT PLAYGROUND With 15 live sex shows, 1,300 Hardcore XXX videos, 1,000s of Hardcore and Softcore Pix, the VaVoom monthly magazine, Kara's exclusive monthly centrefolds, adult games, erotic stories and even casino and sports betting, you won't be going out for weeks particularly now that you can get a FREE trial - your eyes will be popping out of your head! Hahaha! Kara's Playground ...... http://www.rjbtelcom.com/eplay.html GAYEUREKA! The gay newsletter is now available. You can get it here! Gay Eureka! ........... http://eureka.abc-web.com/gayeureka/ EUREKA! TRANSLATIONS As well as English you can now choose any of these languages DEUTSCH ....... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/deutsch.htm ESPAÑOL ....... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/espanol.htm FRANÇAIS ..... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/francais.htm ITALIANO ..... http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/italiano.htm PORTUGUESE . http://eureka.abc-web.com/eureka/portuguese.htm PLEASE VISIT THIS FINE EUREKA! PARTNER SITE ***THE BEST HARDCORE ON THE NET*** http://www.thehoneypot.com We Offer You Only the Best In Harcore Adult Entertainment. Cheap Weekly Rates, Free Samples, And The Wettest Sluts Anywhere. Come See Why They Call It The Honey Pot. INFINITE PLEASURES This site is loaded with lots of free pix to say the least! All of the categories are plainly listed for fast surfing. Bingo! They also have some great free videos! Lots of bush! Infinite Pleasures ...... http://www.infinite-pleasures.com/ INNOCENCE LOST "Two beautiful women whom have agreed to "lose" their inno- cence in the presence of our cameras.." Here we have two hot young ladies doing a nice little romp on a daybed. The pix are high resolution, so you can see it all. They start out slow but then it gets going with a mutual hooter connection! Innocence ....... http://www.firstsightimages.com/innocence/ FREE SNATCH Hey, I guess the price is right. At this site they have well laid out pix. These include, anal, blowjobs, cumshots, hot sluts, group sex, lesbians and fucking. Not a bad mix here! Free Snatch ..................... http://www.freesnatch.com/ PORN CENTRAL Way down at the bottom of the main frame you'll find lots of free pix. These are some good ones. One features two babes pouring honey on each other. Sweet and stick nipples, Yummy! Porn Central ................... http://www.porncentral.com/ FREE CONTEST! If you haven't won free 3 month membership to HardCoreSmut yet, today is your last chance. If the competition is too tough, then just give them your money, once you're a member, your accountant will be the last thing on your mind. Visit Hardcoresmut and click on "Free Guided Tour" for the tour. Email the answer (found in Hardcore Games) to this question: "These hardcore games are the ultimate in what?"............ Send answers to ............. mailto:contest@www.usachat.com HardCoreSmut ................... http://www.hardcoresmut.com FREE STREAMING VIDEO Please note that most of these feeds require a Netscape bro- wser in order to successfully view them. Unfortunately Micr- osoft's browser does not have all the features of Netscape's yet. However, many of the feeds use the RealPlayer and will work in most browsers. If you do not have Netscape and want a free copy click here ... http://www.netscape.com/download/ Just 18 ........................ http://204.244.215.7/teens/ CHAT WITH OTHER READERS This chat is growing fast, and already there are a number of regulars you will meet most days. It's good to see Eureka! readers interacting with each other and having a great time! Adult/Sex Chat .................. http://137.39.63.229/chat/ General/Fun Chat ........ http://137.39.63.229/chat/funchat/ THE BEST PHONE SEX NEW!!!! LD Call only! - Live Hot Girls!!!!....1-664-410-3912 LIVE: 1-on-1, 2-on-1, Group, Dateline.........1-800-644-8779 FREE: Live 1-on-1 (international call only)....011-678-77416 AMATEUR SITE OF THE DAY JAMIE WYLDE: A 36 year old Canadian amateur who has the body of a goddess! She loves lingerie - and that is good news for you, because she looks oohh so good in it. She loves to work out and it shows. Jamie could definitely keep you warm dur- ing the cold winter! ............................ http://amateurindex.com/eureka/ EROTIC STORY SITE OF THE DAY Planet Mojo: Mojo brings you the juiciest erotic stories weekly! Every week all new exciting erotic stories are posted for your pleasure. Visit Mojo today! ................ ................................. http://www.planetmojo.com/ DAILY CARTOON ........... http://www.erosinorbit.com/eureka/ ADULT STAR PIC OF THE DAY Every day we bring you an exclusive choice pic of a famous adult porn star. And we must tell you - these pix are abso- luletly brilliant! .... http://www.xxxadultstars.com/eureka/ TODAY'S FREE PIX Pic 1 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?090 Pic 2 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?091 Pic 3 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?092 Pic 4 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?093 Pic 5 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?094 Pic 6 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?095 Pic 7 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?096 Pic 8 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?097 Pic 9 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?098 Pic 10 ........................... http://137.39.63.229/?099 =========================================================== TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS NEWSLETTER, USE THE REPLY FUNCTION IN YOUR EMAIL PROGRAM, AND SEND THIS NEWSLETTER BACK TO US. ===========================================================

1 0

Surprise - Anonymous Journalist Opposes Laundering [4/4]
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Part 4 "Fighting the Next War" [4/4] [4/4] Next, cyberlaundering? If there is one thing that money launderers hate it is cash; physical cash, that is [No, we hate criminal governments who refuse to issue larger denomination notes]. Shipping huge wads of banknotes is a logistical nightmare [which would be less onerous if, by way of example, the US guVermin recirculated $500, $1000, $5000 and $10,000 FRNs. The printing plates for such "money-laundering friendly" notes having been de-activated since the reign of dictator Roosevelt; refusal to issue higher denomination FRNs to keep pace with Accumulated Wealth Tax extractions (commonly referred to as "inflation") since the 1930s is nothing less than slow-motion, backdoor currency recall]. It also raises the risk that couriers will be intercepted [they mean robbed] and the ["]loot["] traced back to its source. Transferring money electronically is both quicker and easier [but not necessarily safer in certain nations]. [*]Hence concerns in law-enforcement circles that new forms of electronic money could render obsolete traditional methods of tracking ["]tainted["] money, which rely heavily on the poLicing of bank transactions[*]. ["Hence concerns in law-evasion circles that new forms of vooter sanity threatening to outlaw drug Prohibition could render obsolete traditional streams of tax-free income."] ["Hence concerns in law-enforcement circles that new forms of vooter sanity threatening to outlaw drug Prohibition could render obsolete traditional pretexts for increased budgets, privacy deprivation and sheeple tracking."] Electronic-money systems come in three different forms. There are stored-value cards, which allow customers to load money onto a microchip-bearing piece of plastic. This can then be carried around like a credit card. There are computer-based systems, for example, those involving payments over the Internet. and there is talk of hybrid systems, which allow smart cards and network-based payments to work together. Although these new gizmos are still under development, financial regulators and policemen have been studying them intently. And they have raised several questions to which they want answers. One is whether limits will be placed on value that can be held on chip-bearing cards. A card without a limit "could break my back", [then there would be no need for a tree] worries Stanley Morris, [the anti-christ, ] who heads FINCEN, the American government's financial-intelligence unit [FiU]. He thinks launderers could use it to shift millions of dollars on a piece of plastic. The anti-laundering brigade [brigands?!] also wants reassurance that crooks will not be able to set themselves up as e-money issuers. [I guess as opposed to the crooks who set themselves up as fiat banknote issuers] And they want to know whether all transactions in whatever system will be logged at a central point, so that investigators can reconstruct an [unencrypted??] electronic audit trail ["]if necessary["]. [B.S., they don't "want reassurance" or "want to know" squat, this is their non-negotiable DEMAND; they will try to rob, kidnap, jail, and murder anyone who thinks different] At least one card-based system currently being developed by Mondex, a company owned by Master-Card, [MassaCard] is designed to allow money to be transferred directly between cards, without leaving such a trail. DigiCash, which is developing a computer-based payment system, is using what it calls a "one-way privacy" method, which allows payers to check who received money from them, but does not allow the recipients to find out where it came from. [as in a postal money order (but sans the silly $700 per m.o. limit and the ridiculous $2999.99 daily limit) sent to a payee anonymously] While these and other issues, such as who will have jurisdiction over laundering on the Internet, [I smell a brand new Global Bureaucracy in the air] suggest the new systems could cause the authorities a few headaches, some experts beg to differ. A report published last year by the Bank for International Settlements, [another report cited, another worthle$$ bureaucracy, amazing isn't it?] the central bankers' central bank, [in other words, a den of iniquity] noted that in most cases, measures designed to protect the new systems against fraud--such as attaching unique electronic serial numbers to transactions--would make them less attractive for criminal activities than many existing payment systems. At the moment, all financial regulators can do is watch and wait. > E-Communist > 25 St James's Street > London SW1A 1HG > www.economist.com [Remember if you do your banking in a socialist country, there are three parties involved in any transaction: 1) you, the presumed criminal. 2) the (non-)bank employee, snitch/narc/mind-reader. 3) the guVermin employee, looter/thief/spy.] Fly Low S'n'S Pro: Money Laundering, Self-Medication, Militia-Grade Arms, Realism Pro: Indirect Taxation, Adults, Individual Irrevocable Rights } Smurf N Sniff Non-Member, Gunfiscators of Canberra | } P.O. Bunker 6669 "We don't want to be like those paranoid | } Hohoe, Ghana Americans, this is a social DemoBracy." | } fn-fal(a)edict.gov.un +233 55 1234 boycott GovernMedia NLC | Anti: feral guVermin, Vooters, rapacious tyrants, nihilists Anti: biometric herd management, "(The)" children, state granted privileges

1 0

Surprise - Anonymous Journalist Opposes Laundering [3/4]
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Part 3 "Our Enemy: the Journalist" [3/4] [3/4] Whitewash [The Predictable Agenda Revealed] All these developments suggest that the world's existing ["]defences["] against ["]dirty["] money are ["]inadequate["]. [And we all know what their definition of "adequate" would be.] [*]Banking secrecy is a serious problem[*]. As the table shows, bankers in a number of "high-priority" centres can still be prosecuted [heaven forbid!] if they hand over confidential information to officials investigating laundering cases. [So, absent probable cause that a _real_ crime has been committed, "officials" must be allowed to engage in fishing expeditions without repercussion. Therefore, we must give these "officials" carte blanche access to: 1) private (actually public) bank data. 2) safe deposit boxes (send a spare key to FATF when you rent a box). 3) private records (unrecoverable encryption made a felony). 4) physical warrantless searches of "suspected currency smugglers" (on the spot or no-knock). Carte Blanche access is the ultimate goal. All done "confidentially" you understand. I won't tell the victim if you don't. And people would wonder why I don't have a domestic bank account.] It also shows that several of these centres have yet to extend their anti-laundering regimes to cover non-bank financial institutions. [the operative word being _yet_.] No wonder some financial poLiceman claim they are being asked to fight laundrymen with one hand tied behind their backs. [a straightjacket and possibly rope + oak tree would be appropriate <g>] As if that were not bad [good] enough, the current approach to tackling the [non-]problem of onshore and offshore laundering havens is flawed, too. The FATF has done some useful work, [like what exactly?] but it has not been tough enough with slowcoaches. It only censured Turkey several years after it became a member. [Turkey should tell this ATF to go take a flying leap] And it has yet to take action against Austria, another member, which still has anonymous savings accounts [which due to their membership in the reconstituted Holy Roman Empire they will eventually sell out or at best phase out with grandfather clauses] for its citizens [and many non-citizens as well, leave our Sparbuchen alone thank you very much] despite an FATF [*]edict[*] banning anonymity. [A most curious use of language: "despite an edict banning anonymity". And just who is it that supposedly granted FATF the authority to issue _edicts_ (as in dictate, force, coerce) or _ban_ a single goddamn thing?! Apparently a collective "hive" of enthroned, unaccountable, power-usurping bureaucrats are justifying their existence by rendering decisions "for" the little people and sees itself fit to spew forth proclamations unbeknownst to many under imaginary authority it has granted unto itself. How very regal of them. Is said edict (banning anon accounts) an example of the "useful work" this _anonymous_ journalist refers to? The irony is delicious. Does this represent the type of government-by-edict rule that he/she/it finds so agreeable? Perhaps she-he-it spends too much time attending WTO meetings and schmoozing with those-who-know-better to discuss the latest nuances of negotiated edict proclamations. You (anonymous, E-Communist writer) need to get out more, buckwheat. How about putting this edict thingy up for a vote of the Austrian people? An antiquated idea I realize but it would give you and your associates an opportunity to further propagandize the great unwashed to the cause of Total State Control. OTOH, then these aspiring fiscal tyrants would have to crawl out of their committee meetings and explain to the rabble why it is so urgent that private banking be abolished (confidentially, of course). Besides which, owners of anonymous accounts like them just the way they are and would find another way to keep their property out of your greedy little paws regardless (even if you did somehow manage to convince 50.0001% of the vooters to help you fight non-crime. "We" don't have to show you no steeenkin' passport).] Some anti-laundering campaigners say that criticism of members in evaluation reports is often watered down for diplomatic reasons [how can an evaluation be watered down when it starts with zero substance?]. "Every report was put through so many whitewashes", complains Sue Thornhill, [parasite, ] a consultant on laundering to the British Bankers Association. The FATF's fans [such as they are outside the GovernMedia sphere of influence] admit that some plea-bargaining goes on, but insist that it does not let countries off lightly. [What is this utter nonsense: "plea-bargaining" (?) "does not let countries off lightly" (?) Are representatives of "guilty" nations hauled off to some FATF Star Chamber and forced to perform lewd acts with smart cards?!?] Whatever the truth, [the truth being that money laundering is not a crime; acknowledgment of which would run counter to your basic philosophical premise and thus be dismissed as extremist libertarian kookery] there is an even bigger problem with the task force's approach [the problem is the existence of FATF and other agencies of its ilk]. Every time it persuades a financial centre [against it's best interests] to crack down on laundering, crooks will move to new ones [as would any normal person who places a value on customer service]. As the amount of money that comes with them grows, so the incentive for these other havens to change their ways will dimish. [until they become fat and happy like Helvetia, then they begin to evidence a strange desire to look 'respectable' in front of the 'world community' and now readily strap on the knee-pads for their pimp: the United States] The FATF seems to be hoping that peer-group pressure is the solution. [Oh yeah? Just because your friends have abolished (de facto) bank secrecy and have ceased jailing informants and foreign moles does that mean you're going to do it as well? What would your mother say about that?] It has set up a regional Caribbean task [tax] force and is ["]supporting["] the creation of an Asia-Pacific anti-laundering group. [picture an enterprising cretin at FATF calling some string-puller over at the IMF: 'Tell them to give us all the access we want to foreign account holder data or else no more taxpayer coerced bailout for you Asians'...] But even if this attempt to sign up new members works, such an approach will take a long time. And there is a danger that many members will sign up to get the FATF's badge of respectability [and the cushy do-nothing jobs that go along with it for political hacks and career bureaucrats], and then drag their feet over implementing its recommendations. [confusing, are they _edicts_ or _recommendations_ ?] So are economic sanctions against refuseniks the answer? The sort of "economic warfare" envisaged by Senator Kerry is not. Banning citizen[-hostage]s of a few rich countries from dealing with known laundromats would hurt legitimate businesses, while crafty launderers would find ways round the restrictions. [Senator Kerry, (Looter-Taxachusetts): "Yeah right, that's a wimpy apologetic journalist pretending to present both sides of an issue, let's get real here, no _legitimate_ business would need to have an Aruban bank account when our local S&L offers backup withholding, full disclosure on request to any and all government employees, demands for SSN's and fingerprints, deposit insurance and CTRs, in short all the protection and benefits the surveillance state has to offer. So those who have the mistaken notion that all assets DO NOT belong to the state and DO NOT submit to the fact that those assets they are trying to keep from our grasp belong TO US and are only on temporary loan to individual shee, um, people need to be set straight and made an example of. I say we must pull another Panama and invade these small narco-terrorist haven countries and shut all their banks down permanently. If citizens of these pathetic excuses for states want a bank account, our good Bwoston banks are more than happy to serve them."] That leaves Mr Tanzi's proposed strategy as the only current proposal with something to recommend it. Of course, getting an international agreement on minimum anti-laundering standards will not be an easy task. But it is worth a try. For without a concerted global response [= global surveillance of every transaction = dictatorial global bureaucracies] to the problem of ["]dirty["] money, the world's money-laundering machine will be off on yet another devastating [to whom?] cycle. [Summary: Banking secrecy is a serious problem. Unreported asset possession is a serious problem. Non-governmental ComSec is a serious problem. Non-intelligence-agency laundering is a serious problem. Anonymous ownership transfers are a serious problem. Unreported cash transactions are a serious problem. Cash is a serious problem. Teenage fucking is a serious problem. Non-alcohol, non-prescription drug consumption is a serious problem. Contraband smuggling is a serious problem. The emerging e-cash threat is a serious problem. Anonymous accounts are a serious problem. Bearer shares are a serious problem. Multiple identities are a serious problem. Unregistered gun ownership is a serious problem. Inadequate government staffing is a serious problem. Inadequate international cooperation is a serious problem. Inadequate tax revenue is a serious problem. Freedom is a serious problem. Unacceptable. These activities will be stopped. You will be assimilated. These FATF swine need a good ass-kicking.] > E-Communist > 25 St James's Street > London SW1A 1HG > www.economist.com Fly Low S'n'S Pro:__Money Laundering__Self Medication__Militia Grade Arms__Realism________ __Indirect Taxation___________Adults___________Individual Irrevocable Right$ } Smurf N Sniff Non-Member, Gunfiscators of Canberra | } P.O. Bunker 6669 "We don't want to be like those paranoid | } Hohoe, Ghana Americans, this is a social DemoBracy." | } fn-fal(a)edict.gov.un +233 55 1234 boycott GovernMedia NLC | ANTI:_feral guVermin____Vooters__________blue hellmutts______nihilists______ __biometric herd management__"(The) children"__state granted privilege_____!---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Spam
by The Sheriff 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- I've got a question for y'all. Some idiot finally sent me a junk e-mail message that I couldn't do anything about with what I have the knowledge to do -- reading the headers turned up only one ISP, which was apparently owned by the spammer. I'm hoping you guys would know where I could find out more about this individual -- I'm hoping that he does in fact buy his service from someone else, and if so, I'm not sure how to find that out. If he doesn't, is there anything I can do? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 5.0 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBNLenyABMw4+NR29ZAQHvrgf+NnvFR55ExZrzp2m/XDT5MisT2rem4Hct /okK9HV/DkZJzCsklbqjOrJkEHg96txCPyQ+DKBWatP5ywoaw4O47Tn8udiuDNwI 7DGiFcbYtG5fFHKYzDxM3KWtXbIDn1bliFF80xSoYzYdJKqxCkYPtuaDjasr1EIG iYC9Sm+BQoeFb2n0ptxwB8PsK7Pi5nlf5DCXsIMGrQmcm6GqhgkzC3aNPqNucka4 lyY0YjLnx9WC2JDRrg0Xji1zffC5MiZJrf/1ne9HXylEubWXHh49UdCeAXwyzmDS 5vW7FY2XeQL2OcPOKRVU26eiqnyCxxkx/tLi3yq4yRDt/MfIDHBOuQ== =5oGu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

4 6

Congratulations!
by WebSoft Associates 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Sir or Ms: We at WebSoft Associates (http://www.websoftassoc.com) would like to congratulate you on your recent selection by Inc. Magazine as one of the 500 fastest growing private companies in the United States. Being a small private company like yourself, we understand the need for innovative and technically advanced business solutions. We believe that we can offer these solutions at a fair price and at an unmatched professional level. If you are committed to having an Internet presence, we are committed to making that presence be as affordable, practical, and professional as possible. We are currently increasing both our customer base and the services that we provide, as we strive to one day be included in the Inc. 500. We would like you to consider contacting WebSoft for any of your future Internet and business technology needs, and help us meet that goal. Once again congratulations, and thank you for your time and consideration. We will not send further email to your account unless you contact us first. Sincerely, Brian L. Cheek President WebSoft Associates E-mail: Websoft(a)websoftassoc.com Website: http://www.websoftassoc.com

1 0

Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Date: Sat, 10 Jan 1998 13:32:31 -0500 (EST) > From: Jon Galt <jongalt(a)everest.pinn.net> > Subject: Re: Freedom Forum report on the State of the First Amendment > > On 23 Dec 1997, Colin Rafferty wrote: > > > Oppression is done by a society. It can only be stopped by acting > > against the individuals in the society that are doing the oppressing. > > Well make up your mind! Is it done "by a society" or by "individuals"??? Actualy it's both, societies, their beliefs and actions, are individuals acting in concert. The relationship is identical to that of a tree in a forest. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make | | violent revolution inevitable. | | | | John F. Kennedy | | | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Theory Behind USA v. Microsoft
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

John Cassidy writes in the January 12 New Yorker mag of the controversial economic theory which undergirds DoJ's antitrust action against Microsoft. He cites a seminal 1984 paper by Brian Arthur, "Competing Technologies and Lock-in by Historical Small Events: The Dynamics of Choice Under Increasing Returns." After years of disparagement the theory seems to have caught on, at least at Justice and with others who oppose the theory of free market determination of winners and losers. Arthur argues that market dominance by inferior products is possible, and cites MS-DOS as an example. Arthur is now a scientist at the Santa Fe Institute. He says his theory "stands a great deal of economics on its head." One critic said to Arthur, "If you are right, capitalism can't work." For those unable to get the magazine, we offer a copy of Cassidy's essay: http://jya.com/arthur.htm (33K) A side note: the same issue has a short piece noting that the early charges of militant conspiracy behind the OKC bombing have disappeared from the trials of McVeigh and Nichols, and proposes that an apology is due militants, militia and other paranoiac targets.

3 2

The name "Crypto Kong"
by James A. Donald 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-- I have received some negative feedback about the name "Crypto Kong". Two people have complained that it is unprofessional sounding. This is not necessarily grounds for alarm. One reason the name irritates people is that it sticks in the mind like a bad song, which was of course an important reason for choosing it. No one is likely to say "Hey, I saw this plug for some digital signing tool, but I can't remember the name." On the other hand ... What do you think? --digsig James A. Donald 6YeGpsZR+nOTh/cGwvITnSR3TdzclVpR0+pr3YYQdkG dOmrVP48CpP0XXqoK97INGkIpJVWXfGzg3ZO/DO5 40BWwXgdXOaD0gGym/BpRFmyDIg3eYHNBgULka9Ix --------------------------------------------------------------------- We have the right to defend ourselves and our property, because of the kind of animals that we are. True law derives from this right, not from the arbitrary power of the state. http://www.jim.com/jamesd/

2 1