December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: paper on remailers in the intelligence community
by tcmay＠got.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 6:06 AM 2/7/96, t byfield wrote: > Surely you jest. It's one of the weirdest hodgpodges of inane free >association I've ever read. The authors are a couple of regular Jack D. >Rippers. Highlights: It's about par for these "management" conferences. A deep, thoughtful analysis is just not likely (and I don't mean this as a complete insult: his paper is mostly just to touch on what these issues are, not to do an academic study). Strassman is a regular columnist for "Computerworld" and a member of various advisory councils (including a conspiracy-feeding thing called the "EC World Council"). He was a bigshot in the DOD, works for the "Information Warfare" folks (the much-hyped new area generating so many conferences), and has all sorts of ties to the mil-info complex. An Alta Vista search on the string "Paul A. Strassmann" is revealing. >>One of the most prominent anonymous re-mailers is <anon.penet.fi> is in >>Finland. It is frequently used by the Russian (ex-KGB) criminal element. > Maybe he got this from all of the stuff that is sometimes attached automatically to remailed messages: KGB, Sarin, Corona, Area 51, IRA, and those cute slogans like "the shipment will be out of the Port of Oakland at...," etc. :-} But more seriously, any mil-info complex effort to demonize remailers must of course invoke one of the Horsemen. At this time, "Russian Mafia terrorists" is the putative focus of joint U.S.-Russian intelligence activities, and was even the plot of the latest James Bond movie. (Rumor has it that 007 will be doing battle with MEDUSA, the cyberspace descendant of SMERSH, in this case meaning "death to tentacles.") --Tim May Boycott espionage-enabled software! We got computers, we're tapping phone lines, we know that that ain't allowed. ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay(a)got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^756839 - 1 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders aren't even speed bumps on the information superhighway."

1 0

Hardware RNG support for PGP 2.63
by rngaugp＠alpha.c2.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- There is now support for using a hardware random number generator with the most recent version of PGP, (pgp263i) Version pgp 2.63i is now supported. The files for this modification of pgp are at the export controled ftp site in the directory: ftp://ftp.csn.net/mpj/I_will_not_export/crypto_????????/pgp/rng the files are: rg263.zip (compiled both ways, so there are executables approapriate for both inside and outside USA.) Sources for the modifications are included. Executables are included for OS/2 and MSDOS. In the above ????????? varies because of the export control scheme. To get the files if you are in the U.S. and Canada first get the file ftp://ftp.csn.net/mpj/README.MPJ and follow the instructions. Many thanks to mpj(a)netcom.com for providing storage at the export controled ftp site. Other ftp sites are welcome to store these files. Be aware of ITAR. By the way I used to use the mail address: mg5n+alias!rngaugp(a)andrew.cmd.edu But I now use: rngaugp(a)alpha.c2.org because it is faster. But you can tell it is the same person because I sign with the same PGP key. Here is the README file that comes with the modifications. - ------------------------------------------ Hardware Random Number Support for PGP. PGP 263 international version Ever get tired of typing in keyboard timing strokes while generating a PGP key? Ever want to use PGP unattended, but be foiled because there is no one there to type the keyboard timing strokes? Ever wonder if PGP's method of generating random number might have some subtle flaw which would expose it to cryptanalysis? This is a modified version of PGP which allows it to be used with a hardware random number generator. Two kinds of RNG are supported: First, any RNG with a IO driver that makes the RNG look like a file that can be opened (fopen) such that each byte read is a random byte. Second, a bus RNG under the x86 architecture such that random bytes my be obtained with a simple "IN" instruction. The CALNET/NEWBRIDGE RNG is an example of this kind of RNG. A crude sanity check is done to check that the bytes appear to be random. To use the hardware random number generator feature of this software, you must define _ONE_ of the new configuration file parameters RNGDRIVER or RNGPORT in config.txt or from the command line. If you have a RNG of the first type, define RNGDRIVER to be the complete path to the RNG driver. If you have a RNG of the second type, define RNGPORT to be the port number from which to get random numbers. You can use hexadecimal i.e. 0x300. Examples: RNGDRIVER=/dev/random or RNGPORT=0x300 If neither of these are defined the modified PGP will get its RANDOM numbers in exactly the same way that regular PGP does, through keyboard timing. If one of these parameters is set correctly, the modified PGP will get its random numbers from the RNG and you will never be asked to type keyboard timing stokes. I have compiled a version of PGP that supports a hardware RNG for MSDOS and OS/2. I have included the source files for each file that has been modified. To compile get the original source files, put in the modified files and compile as usual. The new source files and this software are covered by the same license as the original, the MIT licence. The USA version pgp263 (without the i) is covered by the RSA license. If someone out there has an PSI-LINE random number generator that attaches to a RS-232 port as if it were a modem, please test it with this software. If the software line characteristics (baud rate, flow control, stopbits, ect) are set correctly (You will have to do this yourself, as this modified PGP does not do this) then all you should have to do is set RNGDRIVER to the RS232 device name. I have not tested this because I do not have this kind of RNG. Someone may wish to add code to set the software line characteristics, but this may be difficult, as the code would vary by operating system and even among the various flavors of UNIX. If you do such a test please report the results to alt.security.pgp and cypherpunks. The executables in the subdirectory "USA" are linked with the RSA library and will not allow you to disable the legal kludge. They should be OK to use in the USA. The executables in the "I" subdirectory are not linked to the RSA library and allow you to disable the legal kludge. It should be OK to use in countries outside the USA such as CANADA. The executables in the subdirectories "DOS" can be used with MSDOS. The executables in the subdirectories "EMX" can be used with OS/2 if you have the EMX runtime system installed. The executables in the subdirectories "OS2" can be used with OS/2. The zip file should be unziped with the "-d" switch if using pkunzip. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3 Charset: cp850 iQCVAgUBMRZneM29s2mG+tTVAQEeVgP/dHnlQd73Yyyzw4uB1lwo76aDZOiVe+i4 VV5aUBpTtBYTknPNeKFaUhLOxZo2tykSrByPXuAQ0dzKyL5MxIOAt52sBx2nQoOi EOFq6mlQH+yUfcfRcjnFGoWtyasBfpdEzO07/shiB8Ts1rRxSR2z0rCoXNuRM8a6 5oU8NDc1vVw= =H9r8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Fw: Release of Pronto Secure first Beta
by geoff klein 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=d4os3ia2um1ynatbsrvdecfwxgqzhl To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com Date: Wed Feb 07 09:53:01 1996 > THIS IS A MESSAGE IN 'MIME' FORMAT. Your mail reader does not support MIME. > Some parts of this will be readable as plain text. > To see the rest, you will need to upgrade your mail reader. - --d4os3ia2um1ynatbsrvdecfwxgqzhl Content-Type: text/plain Content-Description: Fw: Release of Pronto Secure first Beta The previous version of this message was posted to the list in ascii-armor, my embarrassed apologies to all. To: All who have already applied - you will be receiving a message with down load instructions before the end of the week. New applicants are also requested to mail me their public keys, please. Thanks, Geoff - -----Begin Included Message ----- Date: Tue, 6 Feb 96 18:52:41 IST From: geoff klein <geoff(a)commtouch.co.il> To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com Cc: To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com Date: Tue Feb 06 19:12:56 1996 Commtouch has decided to offer a controlled release of Pronto Secure to the Cypherpunk community. We believe that scrutiny of the product by members of this list will help us to release a safe and secure E-mail client. Pronto Secure is an Internet E-Mail client for Windows, which uses external security providers to enhance e-mail with cryptographic security features. The current beta version relies on the proven security facilities of PGP to provide encryption, authentication, integrity and key management features. Future versions will include S/Mime and MOSS compliance. Product requirements: - - MS-Windows 3.1 / Windows for Workgroups 3.11 / Windows 95 / Windows NT - - Winsock 3.11 compliant environment (TCP/IP stack) - - Installed version of PGP. We plan to make Pronto Secure available via FTP at the end of this week. Parties interested in joining the beta-test program are invited to send me pgp-signed e-mail requesting down load instructions and our public key for authenticating the version. Beta-testers who provide us with feedback will be eligible to receive a free final release version. Sorry no T-shirts, but we guarantee that you'll get more wear out of Pronto Secure :). - ----------------------------------------------------------------- Geoff Klein email: geoff(a)commtouch.co.il Product Manager - Pronto Secure http: //www.commtouch.com - ----------------------------------------------------------------- CommTouch SW Inc, U.S CommTouch, Israel 1206 W. Hillsdale Blvd 10 Technology Ave San Mateo, CA 94403 Ein Vered, 40696 Tel: (415) 578-6580 Tel: 972(9)963445 Fax: (415) 578-8580 Fax: 972(9)961053 - ----------------------------------------------------------------- - ---- End of forwarded message ---- - --d4os3ia2um1ynatbsrvdecfwxgqzhl-- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2i iQCVAwUBMRhaXULv5OMYFK1FAQHG5AP9FyxJgjFRo5Y8iuFtMIZXmhWZA9XtD3mV YJrLglBpdOsYpKkaqy9NfTooAdIUzqfytc6MDuwDZCWbAiS9lHNMZSHUXXo6s95z NoIBeEG6qReoGBc0XsNxR/UUQ1vER88gbM4W3jrWv3zPEIV6Yo8y/tv4BbfHfhdH FOX9htLNeQg= =zDru -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: paper on remailers in the intelligence community
by Greg Broiles 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 12:37 AM 2/7/96 -0800, Tim May wrote: >Strassman is a regular columnist for "Computerworld" and a member of >various advisory councils (including a conspiracy-feeding thing called the >"EC World Council"). He was a bigshot in the DOD, works for the >"Information Warfare" folks (the much-hyped new area generating so many >conferences), and has all sorts of ties to the mil-info complex. An Alta >Vista search on the string "Paul A. Strassmann" is revealing. Ah. A feeble attempt to deflect attention from your own cooperation with the Grey aliens and their boot-licking military-industrial-complex errand boys. Even more revealing is an Alta Vista search for "timothy c. may" and "william marlow" Now you'll probably claim that you've never met Marlow or Strassman. Sure. We know what you're up to. You're not fooling us, Medusa. :) -- "The anchored mind screwed into me by the psycho- | Greg Broiles lubricious thrust of heaven is the one that thinks | gbroiles(a)netbox.com every temptation, every desire, every inhibition." | -- Antonin Artaud |

1 0

Re: [noise] the individual and the tribe
by Deranged Mutant 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Jean-Francois Avon (JFA Technologies, QC, Canada) wrote: I originally said: > > ... in the sense that > >tribal societies are individualist. > > I absolutely don't agree. The subordination of the individual to the tribe > is fundamental of their vision of the world. Individualism is not about > personnal opinions, it is about the vision of Man as an entity in itself, > a type of cattle that owe his service to the collectivity of the tribe. Beware of stereotypes about "tribal culture". The individualism in a tribal culture is different than in western society. In some ways the west is way more collectivist than tribal societies... taxes, public works, laws... even the bare minimums that would exist in libertarian societies. Certain forms of self-expression and practices with regards to sexuality, drug use, etc. are quite acceptable in some tribal cultures... even encouraged over western conformism. The use of myths with regards to nationalism and cultural purpose is actually a western phenomenon. Creation myths, "how we got here" etc. stories have different functions in tribal socieities, and are not used as a rationalization of collectivism or submission to the will of the tribe. Decision making in tribal cultures generally is often based on group consesus... if no consensus is reached, no decision is made. Disagreement is acceptable, and in some cultures also encouraged as a sign of adulthood. In western collectivist societies there is decision by manufactured consent of the majority in an air of perpetual crisis.... a tyranny of the majority. > > Crypto makes the tribe (and it's sorcerers) loose their grip... :) Tribes aren't run by chiefs or sorcerers. Large industrial nations are. Rob. - --- [This message has been signed by an auto-signing service. A valid signature means only that it has been received at the address corresponding to the signature and forwarded.] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 Comment: Gratis auto-signing service iQBFAwUBMRheMyoZzwIn1bdtAQHtQAGAyvJmtmErKscUNS5WZUAlPrcFJpSKJxJg c/VoBAcOd/dmF6wvyUO4EuZ9q6PS4xb3 =hjlN -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

GE's Transaction Tech
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

GE Info Services Launches New Transaction Technology Rockville, Md., 6 February 1996 -- General Electric's GE Information Services division said it is launching a new set of hardware and software products that will protect business transactions over the Internet. One of the features of the new system, called "GE InterBusiness," involves using one-time use encryption codes for each online session. The new offering combines the one-time, or dynamic, encrypted session key, mutual authentication, and advanced firewall technology, officials said. By using standard Internet protocols, a user can conduct electronic data interchange, electronic messaging, and electronic file transfers via a secure "pipeline." Those three elements are key in both electronic commerce and GE Information Services' Business Productivity solutions. Anne Biehl, manager of market development for GE Information Services, said one of the key differentiators between her company's secure business transaction technology and offerings from other companies lies with the dynamic encrypted session key. "This is the first system on the market today, that we know of, that's using (this technology)," she said. "It's a pretty powerful 'ring of security' for our users. It's a nice feature we've integrated into our total solution." With the dynamic session key, the session is encrypted to secure all information passed from sender to receiver. The key itself is never seen on the Internet, and hackers can't break the encryption, officials stressed. The new system uses the standard networking and connectivity of the Internet to interface with systems used by GE's 40,000-plus customer companies, officials said. GE InterBusiness runs on all browsers, resides on any Internet-compatible desktop, and interacts with standard Internet applications. GE InterBusiness is available now, Biehl said. Pricing varies depending on the client's requirements, she said. Biehl said today's announcement has nothing to do with the completed sale of the group's GEnie online service to Queens, New York-based Yovelle Renaissance Corporation, reported last month. For additional information, those with Internet World Wide Web access can surf to GE Information Services' Web site at http://www.geis.com/. --

1 0

ATT Waives Fraud Fee
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

AT&T WorldNet Spurs Online Credit Use Bridgewater, NJ, 6 February 1996 -- In a teleconference today, officials of AT&T's WorldNet and Universal Card services announced a program aimed at allowing users to "feel safe" in making online transactions by waiving the standard $50 deductible fee on the use of credit cards for "fraudulent" purposes. The new program, to begin within eight weeks, will apply to all dial-up customers of both WorldNet and Universal Card Services, as well as to corporate users of WorldNet's LAN (local area network) Service who use their Universal Cards upon registering for WorldNet, said Tom Evslin, VP of AT&T Gateway Services, speaking during the teleconference. Some $200 billion in sales were conducted over AT&T's 800 numbers last year, in comparison to only $500 million in sales over the Internet, Evslin pointed out. "Secure credit card" technology is an important ingredient in spurring more electronic commerce, the VP acknowledged, noting that AT&T is one of the partners in the new SET (Secure Electronic Transactions) alliance unveiled by Mastercard and Visa last week. But based on the results of studies conducted by AT&T among consumers, it is just as important that consumers "feel safe" in doing business online as that they "be safe," Evslin told the reporters and analysts. "What's important to consumers is that AT&T put its money where its mouth is, rather than ask consumers to take the risk," the VP asserted. AT&T will launch the new "deductible fee waiver" in conjunction with the availability of dial-up access to WorldNet, a new Internet "content aggregation" service now in beta, by the end of this quarter, according to Evslin. AT&T rolled out the WorldNet LAN Connectivity Service together with BBN Planet last fall. AT&T plans to be "aggressive" in promoting WorldNet in the US and overseas, though mechanisms that will include cross-marketing programs with AT&T Universal Card Service as well as with third-party partners such as Netscape, Verity, McKinley, and as of last week, Broderbund, he told the press. AT&T Universal Card now has more US card holders than any other credit card, according to Evslin. The AT&T also told reporters that he expects other credit card companies will follow AT&T's lead in suspending the $50 deductible charge in online transactions. --

1 0

GTE's Virtual CA
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

GTE's CyberTrust For Web Electronic Commerce Washington, D.C., 6 February 1996 -- GTE officials say that the company's new CyberTrust electronic commerce program will allow companies for the first time to handle most of the CA (Certification Authority) function by themselves, by means of secure Web servers. At the Comnet press conference, reporters were told that GTE, a partner of both Mastercard and Visa, will introduce its new "Virtual CA" capability for Webmasters in conjunction with a trio of related services. The four new services from GTE are aimed at financial institutions, online merchants, and government agencies, as well as at the corporate and consumer markets, said Charles S. Walton, Jr., CyberTrust's program director, speaking at the Comnet press event. One component of CyberTrust, called the Electronic Commerce Service, will provide an "infrastructure" for credit card companies using new secure payment standards for online transactions, Walton added. Another new service, the Partner Forum, will provide online test services and tech support for developers and integrators in the electronic commerce arena. Through GTE's new Cybersign service, GTE will directly handle the maintenance of public key certificates, as well as the issuance, renewal, and revocation of these certificates. But with Virtual CA, GTE will manage certificate management only, permitting Webmasters at subscribing companies to do their own issuance, renewal, and revocation of certificates. Walton acknowledged that GTE's new suite of services will be targeted at the same market now dominated by Verisign. But the GTE services, he maintained, will be differentiated on the basis of general "operational environment," as well as by Virtual CA. In a follow-up interview later, Walton said that GTE, a long-time consultant to Mastercard, began working with both Mastercard and Visa last November on development of SET (Secure Electronic Transactions), a new joint standard for online credit card transactions. GTE, he added, hosted both Mastercard and Visa last week at GTE headquarters in Needham, Massachusetts. Aside from GTE, Mastercard and Visa, other partners in the SET effort include Verisign, IBM, Microsoft, Netscape, SAIC, and Terisa Systems. GTE had previously helped Mastercard to create the SEPP standard, according to Walton. GTE's new CyberTrust, first announced as supporting SEPP, will now support its "successor," SET, he noted. CyberTrust will also comply with the SSL protocol for Web security. During the press event at Comnet, Walton reported that Cybersign and Virtual CA will implement a "dual card, split RSA key design," with "strong access controls." The two systems will use PCMCIA cryptographic hardware token technology and X.509-certificate-compatible software. Virtual CA, he continued, will initially be available on Sun Solaris-based secure Web servers, but will be ported to Windows NT-based secure Web servers by the end of 1996. End users will be able to access Virtual CA through Netscape browsers. The Web server-based service will introduce "verification at the server level, which is really where you want it to be," asserted the GTE official. On-site Webmasters are in a particularly good position to confirm that users "are who they say they are," the journalists were told. As a result, Virtual CA will use a technique called "pre- verification," in which the Webmaster, or RA (Registration Authority), will validate and approve users' certificate requests before the requests go to CyberTrust. CyberTrust will then return a certificate for the end user, in the form of an algorithm, either direct to the end user or through the RA. Companies subscribing to Virtual CA will receive custom home pages for certificate data entry, and for issuing, renewing, and revoking certificates, Walton said. The CyberTrust program director said that the special PCMCIA hardware will be used at the "CA level" only, and will not be required by either end users or Webmasters. No "actual cards" will be issued to, or needed by either group, he added. GTE plans to begin offering both Virtual CA and Cybersign in the second quarter. --

1 0

Re: Reasons in support of crypto-anarchy WAS Re: Why am I wrong?
by lunaslide＠loop.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>>>1. Governments will no longer be "necessary," if they ever were. >>2. Protection will no longer depend on having a "government." >>>3. Anonymous networking technology will protect our rights, to the extent >>>they can be protected. >>>4. Your statement, "...anarchy is a massive step backward..." is absolutely >>>incorrect. > >>That's fine that you believe the things, but for acceptance by others you >>will have to provide support for your position. I, personally, would like >>to see your premises so that I may evualuate your claims. You may indeed >>be correct in your assessment. > >Well, here's my "Assassination Politics" essay. > You all should have a copy of this, so I won't waste bandwidth posting it again. If you didn't read it, I encourage you do to so, no matter what your initial reaction is. It is a facinating proposal and it brings to mind a multitude of questions about privacy, anonymity, ethics and the nature of human beings in general. Now, in respose to Mr. Bell. As I stated above, I found your proposal absolutely facinating, to say the least. As with many others, I'm sure, it struck an initial chord in me that tempted me to disregard it out of hand. However, I was determined to read it through thoroughly and without bias. I have done so and I have the following thoughts about it. The plan it self is feasable, and with more thought, all the wrinkles could be ironed out. I am impressed with the detail of it. I would be curious to see what an open minded laywer would say about it's legality under close scrutiny. However, I must point out, and I'm sure you realize this, that it would not be adopted by the public at large for some time to come, or more likely never. There are too many people who believe that it is wrong to take a life for any reason and that no action justifies death. I count myself among these people. The barganing power of death is indeed great, but some would still realize that a vote would make them responsible, at least in part, for a murder. There is an ethical stumbling block here that may never be overcome. Further, I don't believe you have enough support for your claim that other targets would not be sought. It is one thing to say that enough people won't vote for someone picked out of the phone book, but what if the predicted individual is a doctor who performs abortions, or an activist for gay rights (or *against* gay rights), or Bill Gates ;-). There are also the individuals who are trying to bring about change in society that is unpopular, but is still in the interest of humanity. Abraham Lincoln surely would have been killed by this system, for example. Also, big corporations would be able to cut down their political enemies such as envornment activists, fair business practice activists and competetors' high ranking officers. Even if only one person in charge of such a business were to put out a digital contract, he would have no problem suppling the money for the hit. People who have tried to make changes for humanity that went against the social norm at the time are revered today for their efforts. In this system, they would likely be assasinated. Nothing would ever change because people are always afraid of change and afraid of things they do not understand and the people who fight that ignorance will likely be killed. Your statement that Organization B, the one that collects for any target, is not well supported. They would still be doing *plenty* of business, in spite of the higher prices. Organization B would thrive, make no mistake. And the people who would be getting in on all the action are the rich. All the politicians who oppose their interests would be hit immediately. Anyone trying to change the status quo would be eliminated. Why do you think we are still using combustion engines in the last decade of the 20th century? We could have had better alternatives 20 years ago, but the oil companies would loose out so they have either bought out these ideas or had killed the inventors and bought their patents and are sitting on them. A capitalist economy does not always breed competition that brings out the best and most desireable products because some advancements are bad for all the businesses involved in that market. Big business and the rich would benifit the most from the Assination Politics model. But what if OrgB stops taking donations for "predictions" for "Non-Initiation Of Force Principle" (NIOFP) offenders? Some other organization will crop up to take their place AND the people operating OrgB could be hit for their "ethical" action. There is simply too much opportunity offered by OrgB type organizations for people to pass up. They will not let the higher prices stop them. If the answer to that problem is to regulate the lists of "victims", then the next question is who are these people who are regulating and what guidelines are they following? Who decides who gets to be the moderators? Could there be exceptions to the (NIOFP)-offender standard? Who would they be and why? Could the organizations be anonymous as well? How would the money be transmitted to them in that case? How can we trust or redress grivances with an organization? There are still many concerns regarding the organizations. If the organizations fail, the whole system fails. That's all I can think of at the moment. Like I said before, once one can get past the bias, it is an endlessly intriguing proposal bristling with questions and issues concerning our very beings. This is precisely why I would like to know if I may take a copy of your proposal to my ethics class. I think this is a great topic for discussion and I would like your approval. Respectfully, Jeff Conn lunaslide On the meridian of time there is no injustice, only the poetry of motion creating the illusion of truth and drama. Henry Miller -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQBvAzD3EHEAAAEDAMVwZzXozPjX18mCenA5fJsdWZXcrhJCxPR+SoVCmR7d4ZVU mwITzPTHo/GyLvJrWyk5YdhheczyY2VSawaMrCN/nWA7K9lwAylbKyPxqBhRYJ3C 2wi2uD5LY2wypNOQyQARAQABtB5KZWZmIENvbm4gPGx1bmFzbGlkZUBsb29wLmNv bT6JAHUDBRAw+1bqS2NsMqTTkMkBAQkTAwCersFbCyk8O0MbGlNcZDAe24CLEWQ0 0C5EHni33W76UsG1bybcLsuMH6HVwLF7IqZivnzc7wkujYPQvCqn8HEYYTld8V9V Cou4dOvA8kV7rHvAn/LuLx7DRruLFrRoPSk= =OIT9 -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

1 0

Re: Need a "warning" graphic of some kind for CDA
by Greg Broiles 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 01:48 PM 2/4/96 EST, you wrote: >"David K. Merriman" <merriman(a)arn.net> writes: >> >Now that we all have web pages that are naughty and might be seen by >> >little children, I'd like to hve some kind of a graphic that can >> >universally be seen as a "Warning: The following material is unsuitable >> >for children and close-minded twits". (or words to that effect). >> >> Hmmmmm. Maybe a doll with an international 'no' sign superimposed? > >Either the 'no' sign (red crossed circle) or a wide red cross over one of: > rattle > baby bottle / pacifier > disposable diapers (with contents visible) > safety pin? How about the circle-slash "no" symbol superimposed on the Constitution? -- "The anchored mind screwed into me by the psycho- | Greg Broiles lubricious thrust of heaven is the one that thinks | gbroiles(a)netbox.com every temptation, every desire, every inhibition." | -- Antonin Artaud |

2 1