December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Information
by Brian B. Riley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 9/2/97 9:28 PM, Jonathan Wienke (JonWienk(a)ix.netcom.com) passed this wisdom: >What part of "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall >not be infringed" is too hard to understand? (From 2nd Amendment, >U.S. Constitution) > >When everyone is armed, criminals fear everyone, not just >the police. Just curious, where did you ever get the idea that criminals fear the police? The way our system works these days, the police are hardly more than an annoyance and inconvenience (unless of course an NYC cop asks if you want to go to the bathroom!) rather than to be feared. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQA/AwUBNAzcg8dZgC62U/gIEQLHxgCfTSfMBGA7bf4jWPQD4ATa6Gn2AEEAmgMV QvRO7Ta6RadyVeNYqdnx6+vw =VoET -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Brian B. Riley --> http://www.macconnect.com/~brianbr For PGP Keys - Send Email Subject "Get PGP Key" "When you find yourself on the side of the majority, it is time to reform." -- Mark Twain

2 1

Re: NSA/NIST Security Lab
by Uran233＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Yes but the NSA really wanted the Skipjack for DOD messsages. They (probably) monitor all of those anyway. But Matt did alot of work on his project but did he show how to brak Skipjack and does this totally trash the Fortezza program? I being niaive would not belive that the NSA would let the process continue if it was unsecure, of cousre if they can read all the messages and are sure that others can not. Maybe it is secure except for NSA. But does that mean it is not a good algorithm? DES stood around for a long time, in the public sense. But no one knos if there is a trapdoor. Of course I may be all wrong her but it is a thouhht

1 0

Re: Missing Kids and Porn Links
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Igor Chudov @ home wrote: > > Most of people who publicly "care for children" are hidden pedophiles or > control freaks, in my humble opinion. I agree. Does anyone have any pointers to child pornography sites, so that I can warn people which sites to avoid? T.C. Mayonnaise <tm(a)dhp.com> "Hey little girl, want to make some mayonnaise with _real_ eggs?"

2 1

Diana on a stick
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Rumor has it that Princess Diana will be put on a barbeque-style spit in her coffin, so that when the Buckingham Palace spin doctors are done with her, she will be able to roll over in her grave at a high rate of speed. Dr. Roberts ~~~~~~~~~~~

1 0

Re: Death Pictures of Diana on InterNet!!!
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 09:43 PM 9/2/97 EDT, Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote: >Mike Duvos <enoch(a)zipcon.net> writes: > >> Now that pictures of Princess Diana trapped in the wreckage have been >> printed in European tabloids, it is only a matter of time before someone >> scans them and posts them to alt.binaries.pictures.tasteless. >> >> Clicking on such pictures, of course, is not the moral equivalent of >> having personally run Princess Diana off the road, regardless of what your >> neighborhood CPAC member would like you to believe. > >This is off-topic, but... Why do people refer to the bastards who ran >Di's card off the road by some weird italian name? In a case of Worst Timing Ever by an advertiser, Weight Watchers flyers hit the mailboxes in our area on Friday. They feature a cheesecake shot of Lady Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, saying that losing weight is: "HARDER than outrunning the papparazzi" I guess fat people are doomed.

1 0

Re: Adding Memory to the Net
by bureau42 Anonymous Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- This is an interesting proposal. It would be easier for people who are new to this business if there were more specifics about how this would be implemented. I'm sure you have particular techniques in mind for splitting the data across servers, etc., but everybody else doesn't necessarily know what they are. Examples are nice because you can go over them one bit at a time. Here are some ignorant comments and questions. Mike Duvos wrote: > Bob makes a secure connection to a Trusted Agent doing business... Why is the Trusted Agent necessary? What does the agent do that Bob couldn't do himself? It seems like Bob could split up the data and pay the servers to hold it just as well as the agent. And he wouldn't have to trust anybody. > For the next 100 days, Bob and all of his friends may use the 256 > bit TAG/CONTEXT pair in place of Bob's data and may serve that data > for free any number of times off any network file system server. Or the people getting the data could also pay small fee for good service. Like a tip, if storing the data itself is the dominant cost. This makes it harder to attack the servers by saturating them with requests for data. Usenet has traditionally been free for posters. This model could continue if there were users who were willing to pay to see other people's posts. Servers would keep the data around so long as there seemed to be people asking for it. You could imagine the price going up over time as fewer people want to see it. At some point not enough people may want to pay as much money so it goes away. In this model the server operators would just be information speculators. And, if The Bad Guys started knocking out servers, there would be a powerful financial incentive to start serving the information that was eliminated since its market price should go up. > After 100 days, bob may fork over another 10 cents for another 100 > days, or his data will disappear. The TAG assigned to an Octet > String is unique, and no two strings have the same TAG, and no > string is ever assigned multiple tags, no matter how often it may be > entered and purged from the system. It would be nice if the ten cents sells a promise by the server to make the data available for some period of time in a way which is independently auditable. If the server stops carrying the data, Bob can publish his proof that he was defrauded. Because the facts would not be in doubt, it would be unlikely to happen frequently. > Users could boot their machines off the Network, and instantly see > gigabytes of software available to them. After syncing their cache > file system with the network, they could drop their PC off the roof, > buy another one, and by typing in just one TAG/CONTEXT pair, see all > their files again. This is very cool. You can hide 256 bits pretty easily, which makes The Great Satan's job harder. > Aside from replication done for reliability, there should be only > one copy of a file in the system at any time. If multiple users > submit the same file, there should be no more copies than if one > user submitted it. Would this really be worth the effort? If Bob wants to pay to put the file up twice, why not let just let him? Just Another Cypherpunk -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBNAuAZv+1rw4IkyBFAQG3WQf9EBR/peMkdc+0WT5W6O+L9KMf69artRy9 Fg8kCObbHlYEn/rCd0DRJ+Hd9YLfBz8aeo7YqaU3Lawe9+WW5hH0HbSYZe6vXeBN M5VKW4HJpcY4zapc1DCdCPW72KnWZjlrOsP3X+r1yi1KrLlsORNkl3M85dhS5vLz YRoZIIZE51vmrnV3mCA0dClljP2+e4c7FmxtO36spi7n/PPVwkP7xtHqsy762Ex/ iyxyRXCWnPMFHy0tJRWi25HeGqC2IRg22zQ5zk36c6z/JPS92Yabix/rnVWcazP4 3OnmT+nF3xy3mtdx9eMbPTBvxY28uOq+q2k/0/KjNmDjVRPRl2mlvw== =quQD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Europe puts pressure on FCC over accounting rate moves
by Bill Frantz 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

####################################################### Telecoms Newsline A News Service for Telecoms Professionals Sponsored by Hewlett-Packard Issue 48: 2 September 1997 http://www.telecomsnewsline.com ######################################################## Europe puts pressure on FCC over accounting rate moves ------------------------------------------------------ The European Commission (EC) has warned the US regulator, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), that its unilateral action (see TN 46) could jeopardise the World Trade Organisation agreement on telecoms. The FCC has rejected the WTO agreements sanctioned by the ITU, and intends to impose its own cost-based accounting tariff for international call terminations. The US suffers an enormous trade deficit in telecoms services because its international calls are much cheaper than those in many other countries. This means that far more traffic originates in the US for termination overseas than comes in from abroad, resulting in American international operators paying out more than US$5 billion per year to foreign carriers for the termination of calls. The FCC has come up with its own benchmarking scheme which will be introduced over the next five years. This has enraged many nations who view it as dictatorial; it is also against the multilateral approach of the WTO agreement. Furthermore, in the absence of accurate data, the FCC has used countriesŒ GDP (rather than how much it costs overseas operators to handle calls) to set the settlement rates that US operators will be obliged to pay overseas carriers in future. At the moment the FCC feels that many countriesŒ accounting rates are inflated and bear no relation to the actual cost of providing the service. Poorer countries claim that it costs them much more to handle calls because they struggle with antiquated infrastructure and that they need the revenue from high accounting rates to cover the cost of modernising their networks. In addition, for less developed economies, the monies they receive in settlement rates are a precious source of hard currency. The debate looks set to run and run with the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) stuck between a rock and hard place, trying to find a compromise that is acceptable to all parties. ######################################################## Telecoms Newsline {c} 1997 Hewlett-Packard Co. Editor: Peter Judge Contributor: Annie Turner To subscribe to Telecoms Newsline send mail to <timalist(a)list.telecomsnewsline.com> with 'subscribe hp and your e-mail address' in message body. To unsubscribe, send mail to <timalist(a)list.telecomsnewsline.com> with 'unsubscribe and your e-mail address' in or message body. Or visit our website at http://www.telecomsnewsline.com If you like us, pass it on. This publication is free and may be re-posted. Entire issues may be posted without alteration or editing. Individual stories may also be re-posted, with this message attached. If you want to re-post all issues to a Web site or list, please appreciate our work by telling us. As Telecoms Newsline is available globally on the Internet, we cannot guarantee price or availability of products in your area. Editorial comments or questions please mailto:publisher@telecomsnewsline.com ######################################################## ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | The Internet was designed | Periwinkle -- Consulting (408)356-8506 | to protect the free world | 16345 Englewood Ave. frantz(a)netcom.com | from hostile governments. | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA

2 1

Re: Information
by Integration 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Anonymous wrote: > > > > > > |> >>Dave K-P <k.p(a)snet.net> writes: > > > > |> >> > > > > |> >>>> > > > Information, please! > > > > |> >>>> > > Dont go swimming on a full stomach. > > > > |> >>>> > Don't "escrow" your keys. > > > > |> >>>> Don't take advice from strangers. > > > > |> >>>Don't ask, don't tell. > > > > |> >>Don't eat yellow snow. > > > > |> >DonŽt spit, just swallow. > > > > | >Don't touch anything. > > > > Don't touch _there_. > > > Never piss into the wind. > > Don't pull on a psycho's cape. > Don't jump to confusions.. Don't look a gift horse in the mouth.

2 1

Re: Fate of Jews in America (fwd)
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Cypherpunks are in no position to make remarks about Jewish racism. Jews were far more welcoming to such as Sammy Davis, Jr. than many cypherpunks would be. "Off my porch, nigger!" would be the undoubted greeting from some of our ostensible leaders, as they take shotgun in hand.

4 4

READ THIS, THIS IS NOT JUNK E-MAIL!!!
by naoqize＠worldnet.att.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<HTML><PRE><BODY BGCOLOR="#000000"><FONT COLOR="#00FFFF" SIZE=3> Have you ever noticed that when you are bigger than usual, people look at you when you eat? It seems that what they want to tell you is "You wouldn't be this big if you didn't eat all this stuff!" Hi, my name is Ed. I am a real person who lives in Palm Springs, CA. And until a year ago I was the fat guy that everybody was looking at. Believe me, I had no life! I didn't go out, I couldn't shop at regular stores (well, for shoes may be), I was too embarassed to go to the pool when there were people around. Hey, if you are one of the 80% percent of Americans who are overweight, you know how I felt! But I wasn't simply overweight, I was fat! My height is 5'9" and I weighed 290 lbs! Over 2-3 years I tried miriads of different diets. Guess what, they did not work! I would even try to starve myself, but I just didn't have the guts to do it for more than one day. Then I turned for help to the doctor, this was the last resort! To myself I was thinking "If the doctor doesn't help, nobody will. I'll just eat till my heart stops!" Well, guess what he did? He prescribed Phen-Fen! Have you listened to the news lately?! Need I say more? And then a miracle happened! My uncle (who is a businessman and travels a lot) said he had one thing that could save my life. Believe me, I wasn't very optimistic. But when I looked through it I said to myself "Hey, I can do this and what do I have to lose except for a 100 lbs" That was the only thing that did not require strenuous physical activities, chemicals or herbs, or any exotic food supplements - I could get anything I needed from the store! Sounds too good to be true? It did to me! To make the story short, I lost 8 lbs in my first week, and have been loosing weight ever since (whopping 110 lbs)! I couldn't believe it! I was melting day after day after day! Then I recommended the diet to my friends and relatives, who needed to lose as little as 5 lbs and as much as 60 lbs. All together we lost 480 lbs! That's twice me a year ago! Later I found out, that this program (not a diet!) is used by hospitals worldwide for patients with heart condition. Those folks can not wait a year to lose 50 lbs, they need to be in the operation room as soon as possible, 40-50 lbs thinner. Today I decided to bring YOU this extraordinary opportunity. With minimal effort and minimal investment you can change your life forever! Ask yourself one question, "Am I worth it?", and if the answer is "yes", take the action. Do it for yourselves and your loved ones! You have nothing to lose, except for all those bulges and dress and pant sizes! ACT NOW, for the first 1000 customers will receive 15 wonderful gourmet recipies to help you maintain the desired weight. The recipies alone were advertised for $25, and the response was overwhelming. Today you have an opportunity to receive them for free, just for believing in yourseelf, and for taking a step towards a healthy, thin lifestyle! To get this complete miracle program, please send a single payment (check or money order) of $14.95 (including S&H) to: VIK Enterprises 3940 Laurel Canyon Blvd., Suite #292 Studio City, CA 91604 Please enclose your e-mail address, or mailing address if you prefer to have it mailed to you. Allow 7-10 days for delivery, after which you will be on your way to a fabulous new you! CA residents please add 8.25% sales tax. </FONT><FONT COLOR="#000000" SIZE=3>

1 0