December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

IP: Web sites preparing for Starr report onslaught
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: believer(a)telepath.com Subject: IP: Web sites preparing for Starr report onslaught Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 06:40:46 -0500 To: believer(a)telepath.com Source: Fox News - AP Web sites preparing for Starr report onslaught 2.42 a.m. ET (642 GMT) September 11, 1998 By Chris Allbritton, Associated Press NEW YORK (AP) Web surfers hoping to view portions of Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr's report when it goes online today instead may need to wait in line. An expert in high-volume Web sites said millions of Web surfers clustered around Web sites like people used to cluster around teletype machines waiting for the latest dispatches from news wire services probably will swamp the government's computers. "I would imagine a lot of people getting a 'Site Not Available' (message),'' said J.D. Zeeman, who coordinated IBM's Web site for the Winter Olympics in Nagano, Japan, earlier this year. At one point, the Olympics site was getting more than 110,000 hits a minute, Zeeman said. By Thursday afternoon, the crush of people visiting the House's Web site called Thomas prompted this message: "The Library of Congress is aware of public statements announcing the availability of the Independent Counsel's report at this site. As yet, the House of Representatives has taken no action regarding the public availability of this report.'' A House vote on releasing the report was planned for today. "The technology exists to handle this kind of load today, but it literally takes months to get it in place,'' Zeeman said. "Unless they've done something, I wouldn't imagine they would be adequately prepared.'' A congressional source said the House is adequately prepared, posting the report on government sites and distributing formatted copies to Web sites of major newspapers, magazines, The Associated Press and other news services, and online outlets such as America Online and Yahoo! The Web has become a popular way to distribute government documents in the past few years, but the last time a government body tried to release red-hot documents on the Web, it was a disaster. It was the case of Louise Woodward, the British au pair accused of murder. In November 1997, Massachusetts Superior Court Judge Hiller B. Zobel said he would release on the Web his decision to reduce Woodward's conviction to manslaughter. Millions on both sides of the Atlantic who had followed the story eagerly anticipated the first online release of a criminal court ruling. But a power outage delayed the ruling for hours, and heavy traffic at Web sites made it almost impossible for people to read the decision once it was online. The foul-up with the Woodward decision, while embarrassing, was not unique. News sites usually slow down, or even crash, when the always increasing number of Web surfers rushes online for news. It happened during the Woodward case, after the death of Princess Diana and during the recent gyrations of the stock market. The slowdowns are just the nature of news on the Internet. The parallel is a newspaper that assigns many reporters to a major story such as the Oklahoma City bombing, or printing a lengthy report by an independent counsel. "I guess when you think of throwing all sorts of reporters on a story, you're straining resources,'' said Ruth Gersh, editor of AP's multimedia services. "If you put up the report on the Web, it uses up resources which we call bandwidth.'' Congressional leaders expect the report to be available this afternoon through these government Web addresses: http://thomas.loc.gov/icreport http://www.house.gov/icreport © 1998 Associated Press. All rights reserved. ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

IP: Privacy: Companies admit spying on staff
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: believer(a)telepath.com Subject: IP: Privacy: Companies admit spying on staff Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 12:14:18 -0500 To: believer(a)telepath.com Source: The Age (Australia) http://www.theage.com.au:80/daily/980910/news/news19.html Companies admit spying on staff By LEON GETTLER More than one in two of Australia's largest companies carry out video surveillance of their employees and the general public, a survey has found. The survey revealed that 94 per cent of the companies also monitored employees' phone conversations, electronic mail and Internet usage although the focus appeared to be mostly on volume and frequency rather than content. For example, 16 per cent monitored phone usage while the conversations themselves were only monitored by 2 per cent. Similarly, email usage was monitored by 13 per cent while 6 per cent of the companies were combing through the actual messages. Scrutiny of Internet usage would also reveal the web sites that employees had visited. The PricewaterhouseCoopers survey found that 65 per cent of companies regarded monitoring as a normal part of employment and 85 per had informed their employees that they were being watched. However, they were often not as forthcoming about seemingly minor details, like time and place. PricewaterhouseCoopers information and security partner Mr Stephen Woolley said there was a better than 50-50 chance that Australians would be filmed or recorded at some stage during the day. In the case of the general public, it would be without their consent. ``As is the practice of companies both here and overseas, this information will probably go on file for some years,'' Mr Woolley said. About half the companies said information gathered in Australia on customers, employees and the general public was sent overseas for international data bases. The study also revealed alarming gaps in the privacy guidelines of some companies. Only 35 per cent had formally documented privacy policies in place and 38 per cent said they did not undertake any monitoring to ensure compliance with in-house privacy guidelines. Eight out of 10 organisations did not require staff to undertake privacy training. The survey covered 65 of Australia's largest companies spanning across all major industries including utilities, telecommunications, natural resources, retail, credit, banking and finance, insurance and manufacturing. Based on their total turnover and size of assets, the companies that responded to the survey would represent more than half of corporate Australia. More than one in 10 companies did not inform staff that they could be monitored. Published by The Age Online Pty Ltd ACN 069 962 885 ©1998 David Syme & Co Ltd ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

Starr Report on Openpgp.net
by William H. Geiger III 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hi, I have put a copy of the report on my website: http://www.openpgp.net/starr - -- - --------------------------------------------------------------- William H. Geiger III http://www.openpgp.net Geiger Consulting Cooking With Warp 4.0 Author of E-Secure - PGP Front End for MR/2 Ice PGP & MR/2 the only way for secure e-mail. OS/2 PGP 5.0 at: http://www.openpgp.net/pgp.html - --------------------------------------------------------------- Tag-O-Matic: See the Future; See OS/2. Be the Future; Run OS/2. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3a-sha1 Charset: cp850 Comment: Registered_User_E-Secure_v1.1b1_ES000000 iQCVAwUBNfmV5Y9Co1n+aLhhAQH96gP+MhFHy9ma8IaVbHDmrPDj6h7weTbOw/LU P0PFocm73GTkbXlRVZIEKSC2Jt2+TGtegMRwPtVuKTL6nONj5C/kn0tPFcfLW3rX lQ6cbbNJxwg0rdkAMIm424bdEI5TWdThBXalwY9cOlUeDpOtN3QUni4DetNCbDXd qqPFpVQNk5E= =DLNv -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Re: Clinton's fake apologies
by jimg＠mentat.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Yes, there's crypto content in this msg... a passing reference four paragraphs down. Somebody said: > The annoying thing about Clinton's recent behavior is that he never > comes right out and apologizes, but the press always says he does. Somebody goes on to do the whole Apology Watch number in detail. It doesn't matter. One commentator a few weeks ago had a good line for it: "All mea and no culpa." But so what? This whole apology watch is totally meaningless. We know he can perform sincere-looking speeches on demand, and that's largely why we elected him. If he gives another one and says this time that he's really <very> <very> sorry and he's guilty as hell, I couldn't be more impressed. Or less. What he says about it is irrelevant. This whole "sex scandal" thing is ludicrous also -- we knew he was a horn-dog when we elected him. Yes, my sexual morality is considerably higher than his, but so what? Sexual abstinence has never been a criterion for being President, and probably only one President in living memory <didn't> have sex outside of wedlock... Peter Langston published a "Know your Presidents" column in the last few days, a quiz regarding which Presidents had done what to whom in the Oval Office. Regarding covering up the sex -- so what? When he said they weren't having sex back in February, she was denying it at the time, so it'd take a pretty sleazy character to say he was schtupping her and she was lying about it. The fact is that this sex between consenting adults thing is the best Starr could do with his Whitewater investigation after umpteen years and witnesses and millions of dollars, and I'm not impressed. I'm <much> more impressed with the kind of allegations Softwar digs up -- sweetheart deals for some company to send encryption to China while sitting on the bulk of the domestic encryption industry, for example. If he's really done something that involves treason or high crimes and misdemeanors, let's hear about it and act on it. But airing soiled linen in public isn't germane. If they <do> decide this is now a requirement for high office, I'd like to see all the Congresscritters who've had sex out of wedlock and concealed it take one step forward. Shall we make hypocrisy in high office impeachable also? Today Dave Farber noted that if the CDA were constitutional (which it isn't) Congress wouldn't have been allowed to drool over all these salacious bits on the public networks. Jim

6 7

Re: Newspaper Ad Project
by attila 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I think you'll find that you can buy multicolumn display ads cheaper than classifieds --where you can also get multi-column. display ad is almost always cheaper for one shot; and, you have a choice of position --and therefore cost On Wed, 26 Aug 1998, Jim Choate wrote: >Hi, > >I was wondering if we might go ahead and set a date for publishing across >the country the 3-line Perl RSA. I would like to suggest something like >Halloween, at least a month a way. > >The cpunks here in Austin believe we can handle Austin, Houston, Dallas, Ft. >Worth, San Antonio, and El Paso. > >One issue is that the columns in the paper are pretty limited, so it won't >be 3 lines in reality. Anybody know the standard paper column width? Who >wants to reformat the Perl? >

1 0

CDA? What CDA?
by lcs Mixmaster Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

CNN. Pathfinder. Everybody and his dog with a website. The White House. Posting "indecent material" on the web. I mean, I'm impressed. (A bit more seriously though: could this fact possibly help - in the future - if the US gvt was again seeking to "curb indecency onm the Net"?)

3 3

No Subject
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Sunday, September 13, 1998 - 19:23:30 MET Talk about unimaginable control. How many times did Monica provoke William Jefferson Clinton? Four or five, before he deigned that there should be a denouement? And why? Because, deep in his heart, he knew it was just wrong! Impeachment? Hardly. Instead, Congress should award this Man, our magnificent President, a new decoration, the Presidential Blue Spheres of Steel! Can one imagine any other person on Earth with such iron control? Fortunately, yes! And who could this be? You guessed it! None other than Will-O-Irons buddy and potential replacement, Ol Stiffy himself, Al. O blessed land. O fortunate realm. This is one American who will sleep more soundly tonight, knowing that, whatever the provocation, there can be no accidental discharge of US weaponry, that the finger on the button is controlled by a Will-of-Iron.

1 0

Starr report and CDA
by Matthew James Gering 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The US government violates their own CDA by posting this graphically detailed report to the Internet. Am I the only one that doesn't find that ironic. Well it's good ammo (perhaps) for the next time the CDA comes up. Matt > > http://www.cnn.com/starr.report/

1 0

----> http://stuffed.net/98/9/12/ <----
by STUFFED NEWS DAILY 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Welcome to today's issue of Stuffed. To read it you should click on the URL above. If it is not made clickable by your email program you will need to use your mouse to highlight the URL, copy it and then paste it into your browser (then press Return). This email is never sent unsolicited. Stuffed is the supplement for the Eureka newsletter you subscribed to. Full instructions on unsubscribing are in every issue of Eureka! ----> http://stuffed.net/98/9/12/ <----

1 0

Access to Eudora Export Controlled Archives
by Eudora Export Control Team 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

You may access the Eudora/PGP archives at the following address. <http://www.eudora.com/export/download/> Your username and password are given below. Username: guest51285 Password: 4ChmcTZH ABOUT YOUR PASSWORD Most browsers allow you to paste passwords into the authentication box. If you have a problem with a username and password that we supplied, please try copying the password from this message, reload the PGP download area page in your browser and paste the password into the password field of the authentication dialog box that pops up in front of the page. Additionally, these passwords expire. If you are denied access to the PGP download area at a later date, please get a new password. Be sure to keep this username and password to yourself. If someone you know wants access to the archives, please send them to <http://www.eudora.com/export/> Thanks for your support! The Eudora Export Control Team

1 0