December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Int'l High School Exchange
by buyguy222＠erols.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Have you ever thought about having a high school student from another country come and stay with your family? Chances are you have. You may have had a neighbor that "hosted" an exchange student. Or your child may have talked about the foreign student that was staying with a friend of his. But you may not have known how to bring this experience into your home. Pacific Intercultural Exchange (P.I.E.) has been matching high school students with American host families for more than 20 years. Since 1975, our experience and expertise has enabled us to bring together more than 18,000 families from across the United States with students from around the world. These students, screened and prepared by our overseas counterparts, come anxious to share their cultures with American families, families just like yours. Imagine sharing your traditions with a teenager from another country. What must it be like to experience an American Halloween for the first time? Can you picture the expression of wonder that will fill the face of a child when he witnesses the spectacle of an American Christmas in your hometown? P.I.E., a program designated by the United States Information Agency and listed by the Council on Standards for International Educational Travel, is prepared to assist your family in making this dream a reality. Our staff is working hard to match students from around the world with host families in time to start the new school year this August. These students, who are between the ages of 15-18 years old, will attend the local public high school. Our program provides full insurance for the students, the students will bring their own spending money to cover expenses. We ask only that the host family provide room and board, and of course, love. And with a 24 hour assistance number and local representatives in cities and in towns thoughout the country, our program will be there to support you every step of the way. While we have many traditional two-parent families, single parent families and couples (both young and retired) without children also host successfully. The most important qualification to host is a genuine desire to share your life with a child from another country. To learn more about hosting opportunities with P.I.E., please visit our web site at: http://www.pieusa.org or Email us directly at INFO(a)PIEUSA.ORG

3 2

More on crypto from Bonn
by Donald Weightman 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Another story in today's FINANCIAL TIMES http://www.FT.com describes a "clash" between USCommerce Sec'y Daley and German economic minister Rexrodt on strong crypto. Because the speakers' choices of words are interesting, I quote from the FT article by Ralph Atkins: On coding technology, however, Mr Daley insisted, "there are certain legitimate areas where governments have to be involved". Encryption should be used to protect credit card numbers or detailed contracts from being read. But, he went on: "We must also make sure national security is safeguarded by applying those rules sensibly, so that potential terrorists or other sophisticated criminals cannot hide their work." Mr Rexrodt hinted the European ministers regarded US policy on exporting encryption technology as discriminatory. He backed "strong" encryption procedures, which he said were "offering users the only protection that they have, the only certainty, that their data is not going to be divulged or misused on open networks". Mr Rexrodt was backed by Mr Ron Sommer, chairman of Deutsche Telekom, Europe's largest telecommunications group, who said: "Anyone who uses the point of public security as an argument in this [encryption] issue has not realised or acknowledged that any such legal requirements stand in the way of the further spread of electronic commerce." Questions for the reader: What's a "potential" terrorist? (Is the occasional apparent c'punx paranoia justified?) How is the US export policy discriminatory? Why is DT coming out on this issue? Who are their strategic partners for ecommerce among US telecomms? (I'll have to ask around about that ...) cheers ......................................... Donald Weightman dweightman(a)radix.net

5 4

New Add-On Law / Re: Freeh's Testimony (FBI Seeks Domestic GAK)
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Duncan Frissell wrote: > More generally, it is legal not to speak and thus to deprive police and > prosecutors of the contents of your mind. Crypto just extends this right. Duncan, as he often does, points out a small truth which goes to the very heart of the issue of criminalizing strong encryption. Criminalizing crypto is criminalizing _private_speech_ and also _private_thought_. Mark my words, when the day comes that LEA's have the technology to read human thoughts, then we will be seeing this same debate taking place in that arena. The "legitimate needs of law enforcement" rhetoric, et al, will be drug out for the billionth time to thwart the danger that a CypherPunk might fart in the woods without an LEA recording it. Think back to the first time you read "1984" and think about what you, yourself, could _add_ to the book from your own personal knowledge and experience since that date. If we added all of the instances of "Big Brother" becoming an accepted reality of everyday life since then, the tome would rival "War and Peace" in volume and scope. If I choose to write my prayers on a word processor, in order to better organize my spiritual thoughts and be able to reference them to remember my promises to God, does the State have a right to demand I let them view those prayers, and private religious thoughts? If I use a computer to write my attorney, perhaps even outlining my activities, etc., in regard to criminal charges against me, does the State have a right to demand access to it? Am I allowed to whisper to my lawyer in court, but not to type what I want him to know on a computer screen he has in front of him in the same courtroom? Am I allowed to tell a $200/hour psychiatrist that someone made me mad enough to "kill" them in order to stay sane enough not to do so, and have it kept confidential, but be denied the right, if I am a poor person, to do the exact same thing in writing on my computer, with the help of a $4.95 paperback self-help/psychology book? Have private thoughts been "corporatized/governmentized" somehow? Are our private thoughts sacred only when shared with a recognized authority? If I share them with myself, do they become the property of the State? Am I totally out of my mind, or has life become tremendously fucking scary, and nobody but me has noticed? Sometimes I feel like the guy on the plane in the "Twilight Zone" movie, who is the only one who can see the monster on the plane's wing that is endangering everyone's life. And if you shoot at the monster nobody else can see, then they strap you down and take you to the rubber room. (Obvious analogy to McVeigh and Death Row purely unintentional.) {"Your honor, this search warrant is for the purpose of cracking the suspect's head open with a crowbar and prying his brain out so that we can poke around, in _good_faith_, I assure you, and look for evidence that pertains to a crime that may have been committed.") If you don't provide a breathalyzer sample, you are automatically guilty of drunken driving (even if the DMV License Tester is handing you a perfect score/report as the officer places you in handcuffs). I have no doubt that under future key escrow laws that your prayers to God and your letters to yourself detailing the most intimate details of your life will make you automatically guilty of tax evasion unless you allow strangers who are hostile to you (police, judges, prosecutors) to read them. Yes, and one day, even our private thoughts will be considered to automatically make us guilty criminals unless we allow LEA's access to them. (The "lie detector" is a case in point, and it has in the past come dangerously close to being afforded the same status as the breathalyzer, even though it represents "voodoo" as much as it does "science.") If a tree falls in the forest, and nobody hears it--is it a drug trafficking tree or a child molesting tree? TruthMonger

3 2

Routing around damage
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Remember "the internet interprets censorship as damage and routes around it"? I'd be happy with an internet that interprets DAMAGE as damage and routes around it. >A minor construction accident in San Jose, California, caused >three hours of Internet slowdowns this morning, especially for >those trying to connect to and from West Coast Web sites. >Backbone Internet providers route requests and information >through about a half-dozen network access points (NAPs). >When one has a problem, it can affect the entire Internet.

6 7

Re: The White "Compromise"
by Declan McCullagh 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The White Compromise is what I wrote about in my Netly piece last Wed? and my post of last night called "Congress & Crypto Roundup: Vote in Commerce cmte tomorrow." >From memory: The "compromise" would remove some export restrictions on crypto, provided that the program was readily available overseas already. It would not remove all export restrictions. (This is in the original SAFE bill, which it amends.) It also includes those four points I wrote about, including giving the FBI tons of $$$ to buy them off. More disturbingly, it doubles the crypto-in-a-crime penalties. The crypto coalition letter sent around last week was right on this point: representatives should oppose //all// amendments to SAFE, including the White so-called "compromise." -Declan At 10:07 -0400 9/24/97, Scott Carr wrote: > I spoke to a staffer of Rep. Strictland's office (a rural Ohio >district, I voted for the other guy last year, sigh...) and she did >not know the Congressman's position on SAFE five and a half hours >before the markup. Reading between the lines, he seems to be heading >for the White "Compromise". > > Now a question, does the White amendment remove export limitations >on crypto? Strictland's legislative director stated that was her >understanding. I thought it left the status quo in that regard. > > (I am hearing that damned word "COMPROMISE" too many times talking >to these jokers for my comfort. The only compromise I see is the >compromising of my data and security.)

1 0

Re: Oxley Amendment
by Lee Tien 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>The future, however, is uncertain. The bill now goes to the >House Rules committee, whose chairman said today in a >strongly-worded letter that he'd only allow a bill to go to >the floor if it included Oxley's amendment. Look for a hell >of a lot of behind-the-scenes lobbying on this now... > >-Declan What's the path? Given the multiple committees, is there a prescribed sequence or do they work in parallel? What about the Senate bills? Suppose Solomon allows SAFE to go to the floor. Does SAFE need to be reconciled somehow with any Senate bill? Could Oxley's amendment could be made on the floor, with little or no warning? In some sort of conference committee? I'd love to see a simple map/diagram of all the inflection points where the FBI/NSA forces can further twist SAFE. Call it morbid curiosity. Last year's model was bad, and it's only gotten worse. Lee

7 7

Not worried? You will be... (fwd from Yucks)
by Adam Shostack 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

----- Forwarded message from Nev Dull ----- >From nev(a)bostic.com Tue Sep 23 02:39:35 1997 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 1997 14:05:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Nev Dull <nev(a)bostic.com> Subject: Not worried? You will be... To: nev(a)bostic.com (/dev/null) Not worried about companies collecting information about your purchasing habits? You will be... =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Dear Mr. Jones: Our research indicates that you have not bought condoms at SpiffyMart recently. (Your last purchase was 8 weeks ago.) Further, you have stopped buying feminine hygiene products, but have sharply increased your frozen pizza and dinners usage in the same time frame. It's clear that Ms. Jody Sanders and you are no longer "an item". (It's probably for the best -- she consistently buys inexpensive shampoo, and it was obvious that the two of you were not economically compatible.) The Postal Service database confirms that she filed a change of address form. We at Hotflicks International offer our condolences. As the number-one vender of hot XXX-rated videos, we want you to know that our products can help you through this difficult period. When you're feeling lonely, check out our unmatched catalog, there is guaranteed to be something that you'll want to purchase! Order from this catalog and we'll throw in an extra tape FREE! Yours Truly, Pat Aureilly, Hotflicks Marketing Manager ps: That "blond" at O'Dougles last Saturday for whom you bought a Strawberry Marguerita? Forget it! Her HMO database confirms that she's had three yeast infections this year and was tested for a sexually transmitted disease. Our tapes are much safer! ------------------------------ ----- End of forwarded message from Nev Dull ----- -- "It is seldom that liberty of any kind is lost all at once." -Hume

1 0

NewSpeak: TIS RecoverKey
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text X-Authentication-Warning: fma66.fma.com: majordomo set sender to owner-espam(a)lists.espace.net using -f X-Orig-From: rah-web <rah(a)shipwright.com> X-e$pam-source: Various X-Sender: rah(a)pop.sneaker.net Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 23 Sep 1997 21:20:35 -0400 To: espam(a)intertrader.com From: Robert Hettinga <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: NewSpeak: TIS RecoverKey X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by lbo.leftbank.com id VAA21601 Sender: owner-espam(a)lists.espace.net Precedence: bulk Reply-To: e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by pop.sneaker.net id WAA04695 --------------------------------------------------------------------- This mail is brought to you by the e$pam mailing list --------------------------------------------------------------------- From: rah-web <rah(a)shipwright.com> Reply-To: rah(a)shipwright.com MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Hettinga <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: NewSpeak: TIS RecoverKey http://www.prnewswire.com:80/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/s tory/9-23-9 7/322338&EDATE= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="322338&EDATE=" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="322338&EDATE=" X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by lbo.leftbank.com i d VAA21516 [Todays News] Frontier Technologies and TIS Announce Strategic Alliance to Deliver RecoverKey-enabled e-Lock Partnership Brings Together Strong Cryptography and User-Controlled Ke y Recovery MEQUON, Wis., Sept. 23 /PRNewswire/ -- Frontier Technologies and Trus ted Information Systems, Inc. (Nasdaq: TISX), today announced a strategic all iance to integrate Frontier Technologies' e-Lock(TM) security family with TIS' RecoverKey(TM) Cryptographic Service Provider (CSP), offering customers a n easy-to-use solution for managing strong encryption across Windows(R) 95 and Windows NT(R) applications. This alliance increases opportunities for implementing and managing strong encryption worldwide while putting users in control of their own data and privacy. The e-Lock products will work seamlessly across the Internet, intrane ts and extranets with the RecoverKey CSP so that users can employ the strong est levels of cryptography with the means to prevent "locked and lost" data. Customers using e-Lock with RecoverKey simply click a button to secure documents and/or to recover data that would otherwise be lost due to a forgotten password or lost key. "RecoverKey gives users the opportunity to enact data saving measures up front when employing the e-Lock solution," said Dr. Prakash Ambegaonkar, Frontier Technologies' Chairman & CEO. "Frontier's expertise coupled wit h TIS' innovative technology gives users the strongest levels of assurance that their valuable information is locked up tight while providing an emergenc y mechanism for unlocking it if the key becomes lost or destroyed." "TIS is pleased to join forces with Frontier Technologies in their commitment to meet market demand for applications that support user contr olled key recovery," commented Homayoon Tajalli, TIS Executive Vice President a nd General Manager, Cryptographic Products. "Global e-commerce and communic ation depends on impenetrable transmission and storage of valuable information. e-Lock can now bring customers the benefit of robust encryption with a ba ckup plan in place for recovering locked data if the original key is inaccessi ble." Frontier Technologies' e-Lock security family is a complete, standards-based solution for creating, using and managing secure applicat ions for intranets and the Internet in both Windows(R) 95 and Windows NT(R) environments. The e-Lock family of products, e-Sign, Secure Messaging Toolkit, and e-Lock PKI support digital signatures, encryption and public key infrastructure. Trusted Information Systems' RecoverKey CSP is the first software of its kind to reach a worldwide commercial market, enabling Windows 95 and Wind ows NT desktop users to implement powerful cryptography at the click of a but ton. Incorporating popular algorithms such as RSA, DES, Triple DES and 128-bit RC2/RC4, the RecoverKey CSP will provide the components necessary to encr ypt and decrypt information seamlessly across applications. RecoverKey CSP trial versions are currently shipping and the RecoverK ey CSP-enabled e-Lock product will be available in late fall. Visit the Fro ntier Technologies website at http://www.frontiertech.com for free download of the e-Lock products. Frontier Technologies' mission is to pioneer Internet and Intranet applications that make individuals more productive and businesses more competitive in a global market. Trusted Information Systems, Inc., is a leading provider of comprehen sive security solutions for protection of computer networks, including global Internet-based systems, internal networks, and individual workstations an d laptops. RecoverKey is a trademark of Trusted Information Systems, Inc. e-Loc k, e-Cert, e-Sign, e-Mail are trademarks of Frontier Technologies Corporatio n. All other product and company names may be trademarks of their respective owners. SOURCE Frontier Technologies CONTACT: Ann M. Krauss, 520-797-0583, 520-797-0182 (fax), Ann(a)Frontiertech.com or Nicole E. Rogers, 414-241-4555 x293, 414-241-7084 (fax), NicoleR(a)Frontiertech.com, both of Frontier Technologies, or Shoshana Rosenthal of Trusted Information Systems, 301-947-7194, shoshana(a)tis.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- [PR Newswire Logo] (Today's News) (Company News On-Call) (Feature News) (Automotive) (Entertainment) (Health/Biotech)(Technology) (Financial) (Energy) (Washington and the World) (Money Talks) (About PRN)(Ask PRN) (Links) (P RN Events) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- ©1997 PR Newswire. All rights reserved. Redistribution, retransmission, republication or commercial exploitation of the contents of this site are expressly prohibited without the written consent of PR Newswire. These pages have been optimized for Netscape v.2.0 or later --------------------------------------------------------------------- Where people, networks and money come together: Consult Hyperion http://www.hyperion.co.uk info(a)hyperion.co.uk --------------------------------------------------------------------- Like e$? Help pay for it! See <http://www.shipwright.com/beg.html> Or, for e$/e$pam sponsorship, <mailto:rah@shipwright.com> --------------------------------------------------------------------- --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/

1 0

REminder: Physical meet this Wednesday
by Christian Claborne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The last message had Thursday in the subject... It's Wednesday. 2 -- C -- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- This Wednesday!!! San Diego Area CPUNKS symposium Wednesday, Sep. 24, 1997. Topic: What action do we take if the situation get's out of hand (See message below from Mark H. below). It is my belief that any group, no matter how small, can accomplish great things if they apply themselves. Cypherpunks are not just "users", they poses several additional quanta of the stuff that enables creative thought, and skill. Don't forget to bring your public key fingerprint. If you can figure out how to get it on the back of a business card, that would be cool. If you want the suspicious crowd there to sign your key, bring two forms of ID. Place: The Mission Cafe & Coffee Shop 3795 Mission Bl in Mission Beach. 488-9060 Time:1800 Their Directions: 8 west to Mission Beach Ingram Exit Take west mission bay drive Go right on Mission Blvd. On the corner of San Jose and mission blvd. It is located between roller coaster and garnett. It's kind of 40s looking building... funky looking (their description, not mine) They serve stuff to eat, coffee stuff, and beer + wine stuff. See you there! New guy, bring your fingerprint. Drop me a note if you plan to attend... 2 -- C -- - ------------------------ Date: Fri, 12 Sep 1997 16:04:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Hedges <hedges(a)infonex.com> To: all-at-infonex(a)infonex.com Subject: federal cryptography legislation Sender: owner-all-at-infonex(a)infonex.com - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- A bill called "SAFE" (HR-695, "Security and Freedom with Encryption") in the U.S. House of Representatives would have allowed U.S. software companies to export strong cryptography, and would have promoted privacy in all U.S. communications. Cryptography is mathematical means of making a message secret. Now, this bill has been rewritten to introduce more restrictive cryptography legislation than ever before seen in the U.S. Public support for cryptography use and export is very strong, as evidenced by the California state legislature's unanimous vote 9/5/97, calling on Congress and the President to revise and relax export laws (SJR-29). Companies world-wide already produce strong cryptograpy software, and U.S. buisness is rapidly losing ground in the world-wide software and telecommunications market. The House National Security Committee this week voted to continue export restrictions in the SAFE bill and to install "key escrow" proposals of the defense and intelligence organizations. This would not only continue the status quo legislation, it would strictly regulate and restrict domestic use of cryptography, an unprecedented act. Key escrow legislation in SAFE would mandate government "back doors" in all communications software before the end of the millennia in the United States, imposing criminal penalties for use of secure cryptography. Effectively, every citizen would be required to give law enforcement involuntary and transparent access to all communications, including financial, business, and personal messages. Key escrow also exposes all U.S. communication to a single point of failure, which a hacker, spy, or corrupt official could exploit to gain access to all personal, industry, and financial information. More information is available in our most recent press release. Press releases can be viewed at http://www.anonymizer.com/press/. Please, call your congressional representatives and senators and encourage them to oppose restrictive legislation on cryptography and mandated government access to all communications. Names and phone numbers for your local legislators can be obtained from www.house.gov and www.senate.gov. Sincerely, Mark Hedges Anonymizer Inc. Infonex Internet Inc. - -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBNBnJhBVo2SUWMp6NAQFyNQP/UuogfBfcjRw7q5rda8+1BrGkMEHpixau J7JfbhKyv5yWdPZsnh8F3m/kaUahLEaSdLCcmAJzbroKApGBjUtT6bRacOtVps3X TzZXLO2NZd4UBsksUC1f3WWnnRl8+03jiQMboSpBvUVmHqA1sFiz3OQpJVWv1yge jEEk7R2Maeg= =VrfI - -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 Charset: noconv iQEVAwUBNCRRAIP1MBWQ+9udAQHNuAf/Wf/vf7O7A3iZhd9BjlzyI0FvcOTelUOs 5JhxXN0w86YWzoluZue8jY7uKmxGVuySdikQSw4OxLS5wZG05nByoIQlhlzLPYIl vrQuQZ0EeGIOycwS7IuNLFFyx+C1E7HxcdX0UR3qMDgEiiFb09DlcuDHeSp52RZW s6t7AFR7ZoVz28KanihgDRQdk9QTw0HuaZV3hHNl11610HaPURRe4SX7zgR1cHAf naoTZI70GqVoUVYVrm+oVHln7HsdFqnrO/1GAVpLzKpEnzfT9C0d0o7T4t/WX4CM yeeO2UZUwfg01VyCHORpFYbx1SrFlW4rZNZqOJMP2lA2cNDZBsLrhg== =/sWk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ... __o .. -\<, Claborne(a)CYBERTHOUGHT.com ...(*)/(*)._ Providing thoughts on your computing needs. http://www.CYBERTHOUGHT.com/cyberthought/ PGP Pub Key fingerprint = 7E BF 38 3F 24 A7 D1 B0 54 44 96 AA 10 D0 5D 51 Avail on Pub Key server. PGP-encrypted e-mail welcome! Dreams. They are just a "screen saver" for the brain.

1 0

Its working read this, give it a chance,
by wdsmsn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

WE CAN NOT TELL YOU HOW EXCITED EVERYONE IS THAT IS GETTING INVOLVED IN THIS PROGRAM IT IS WORKING LIKE A CHARM, FINALLY A WAY TO MAKE A LOT OF EXTRA MONEY WITH NO GAMBLE. , ....... WHEN YOU HEAR OF THOSE THAT DID IT AND HOW GREAT IT WORKED YOU WILL WISH YOU WOULD HAVE TRIED IT, Five people who said it did not work and it was just a scam, are now involved in it , After they saw what others have received. *** Print This Now For Future Reference *** This is working people are reporting tremendous results, Give it a try what have you got to lose.... HOW TO MAKE $800,000.00 CASH IN FOUR WEEKS! How about taking the profits and opening your own business? How about telling that boss you hate to go jump in the lake? Do this Keep it among people you know how can you possibly lose here??? Then ask yourself... How much can I make??? The answers should tell you it's worth a try. All you can lose is 5 bucks (SO WHAT!!!) Yet you may make a nice profit. Read on. Jane Nelson tells how she ran this program four times last year. This first time, she received $500,000 in cash, and over $700,000 the last three times this year. If this letter is continued, as it should be, EVERYONE PROFITS! Just send one person FIVE DOLLARS - THAT'S ALL! After the first time, you'll see how easy it is and how beautifully it works! Now here are the simple details... Follow WHAT TO DO below and IN ONLY FOUR WEEKS YOU'LL RECEIVE UP TO $700,000 because most people will respond, due to the LOW INVESTMENT and HIGH PROFIT POTENTIAL. WHAT TO DO On a blank sheet of paper, write "Please put me on your mailing list" along with your name and address and put it with a Five-Dollar Bill. Through regular mail, send this to the last person on the list below. ONLY THE LAST PERSON ON THE LIST GETS YOUR NAME AND $5 BILL! Then remove that name from the list. Move the other three names down and add your name to the list in the #1 position. After you have re-typed the list with your name in the #1 position, MAKE AT LEAST 20 COPIES OF THE LETTER AND SEND IT OUT IMMEDIATELY TO 20 OR MORE PROSPECTS. Friends, relatives - anyone you'd like to see get rich along with you! The faster you act, the faster you'll get your money! US Mail or Email!!! For email, you can just copy this whole letter and paste it into the body part of AOL's "Compose Mail" box. Then be sure to remove the last name on the list below, and add your name as the first. YOU STILL HAVE TO USE REGULAR MAIL TO SEND YOUR $5 AND ADDRESS TO THE LAST NAME! That's what keeps this legal and how everyone gets paid! That's all there is to it! Here's how it works: 1. You send out 20 letters to 20 Prospects 2. Those 20 mail out 20 letters each (400) 3. Those 400 mail out 20 letters each (8,000) 4. Those 8,000 mail out 20 letter each (160,000) 5. And those 160,000 people mail YOU 5$ each ($800,000) Your entire investment is only $5!!! Very inexpensive when you consider the results you can get! HONESTY AND INTEGRETY MAKE THIS PLAN WORK. Breaking the rules on the way it is sent only messes up your chance of it working right! DON'T BREAK THE RULES! Be sure to follow the instruction and omit nothing. At this time we are receiving an almost 100% return rate for people wise enough to participate in the plan. The majority receive about $700,000 on average! And rest assured this plan is 100% Legal! You are providing a service to people to put them on your mailing list. (Please refer To): (Title 18, Section 1302 of the US Postal Code and Lottery Laws.) PLEASE MAIL YOUR LETTERS ASAP! I WISH YOU SUCCESS AND TOGETHER WE'LL ALL PROSPER. DON'T GIVE UP ON YOUR DREAMS! -------------------------------------------------------------------- #1 Ray Favereau 822 Kalli Creek Lane St. Augustine Fl 32084 #2 Danielle Burkes 1057 Larkspur Loop Jacksonville Fl. 32259 #3 J.D. Clark, P.O. Box 613, Lahoma, OK 73754 #4 Ryan Thomas, P.O. Box 2872, Joplin, MO 64803 Include your email address for courtesy updates.

1 0