December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Is Privacy-hater Gary Burnore a Sex Offender?
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I just found this posted to usenet. Can anyone in NC verify it? Subject: IMPORTANT: Gary L. Burnore is a Sex Offender! From: tsatan(a)hotmail.com Date: 1998/04/06 Message-ID: <6gau3g$82$1(a)orthanc.reference.com> Newsgroups: triangle.general Looking through the new NC Sex Offender Registry, who did I see? GARY LEE BURNORE 4201 BLAND ROAD APT J RALEIGH NC 27609 Offense and Conviction Information: Conviction Date: 03-13-1997 NC Statute: 14-202.1 - INDECENT LIBERTY MINOR Sentence Imposed: PROBATION 3Y Court County: SANTA CLARA, CA Two questions: 1-Is this the same jerk who posts regularly to triangle.general? 2-If so: anyone know anything else about this conviction? Thanks.

2 1

Canada's Crypto Policy
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Thanks to mctaylor and Carrie Bendzsa at Entrust we offer her transcription of the recent Entrust roundtable on Canada's Cryptography Policy: http://jya.com/CA-crypto.htm (113K) Good, vigorous discussion of how US export policy inhibits Canada's crypto policy and commerce. And what might be done to get the CA gov to defy the supercop without getting shackled like US miscreants.

1 0

Nobody's Friend
by StanSquncr 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

In a message dated 4/7/98 2:26:38 PM Central Daylight Time, nobody(a)REPLAY.COM writes: << From: tsatan(a)hotmail.com >> I would read that as - T(he)Satan(a)HOTmail.com if I were you! ;-) I think he thinks he's serious. (a reminder - IMHO, the Christian Coalition is the anti- Christ in disguise) Stan

1 0

Stan is Nobody's Friend?
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 15:45:17 EDT From: StanSquncr <StanSquncr(a)aol.com> To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com Subject: Nobody's Friend In a message dated 4/7/98 2:26:38 PM Central Daylight Time, nobody(a)REPLAY.COM writes: << From: tsatan(a)hotmail.com >> I would read that as - T(he)Satan(a)HOTmail.com if I were you! ;-) I think he thinks he's serious. (a reminder - IMHO, the Christian Coalition is the anti- Christ in disguise) Stan Stan, somebody needs to pry your cocksucking lips off of Pat robertson's cock long enough to beat your stupid fucking ass down with a clue-by-four. stop swallowing all that mainstream media jizz, you fucking cumbucket, and quit the dope too. your daddy

1 0

Re:Nobody
by StanSquncr 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

In a message dated 4/7/98 4:19:39 PM Central Daylight Time, nobody writes: << Stan, somebody needs to pry your cocksucking lips off of Pat robertson's cock long enough to beat your stupid fucking ass down with a clue-by-four. stop swallowing all that mainstream media jizz, you fucking cumbucket, and quit the dope too. >> I see you've come out of your closet, Nobody! Stan

1 0

Re: Canada's Crypto Policy
by James Glave 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Also see my Wired News piece on this meeting: http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/11397.html Crypto Canucks: Hands Off Our Keys! 5:03 am PST 2 Apr 98 - The captains of Canada's cryptography industry sent a message to Ottawa yesterday: keep clear of domestic crypto controls, and lighten up on the export policies. Was anyone listening? At 03:22 PM 4/7/98 -0400, John Young wrote: >Thanks to mctaylor and Carrie Bendzsa at Entrust we offer >her transcription of the recent Entrust roundtable on Canada's >Cryptography Policy: > > http://jya.com/CA-crypto.htm (113K) > >Good, vigorous discussion of how US export policy inhibits >Canada's crypto policy and commerce. And what might be >done to get the CA gov to defy the supercop without getting >shackled like US miscreants. James Glave : Senior Technology Writer : Wired News http://www.wirednews.com : 415.276.8430

1 0

hi
by Sumlatino 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

To: Sumlatino(a)aol.com Subject: hi From: Sumlatino <Sumlatino(a)aol.com> Date: Tue, 7 Apr 1998 20:09:29 EDT Organization: AOL (http://www.aol.com) <a href="http://members.xoom.com/hitlerx/index.html">Click here for FREE pictures</a>

1 0

Cost of Ak manufacture
by ichudov＠algebra.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

With the current prices on AK clones being around $400, I expect that their domestic manufacture will become profitable. In fact, as someone else has noted, any toy maker would be able to produce all parts of the AKs, with the possible exception of barrels. Judging by their construction, there is not a lot of costs and they should be a lot cheaper than AR-15s (against which I have almost nothing). So, the question is, it is realistic to expect that AK s will be manufactured here? Will the control freaks be able to stop it? - Igor.

1 0

cmea
by Mixmaster 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

A few weeks ago someone referenced a program that realtime decrypted PCS crypto however I managed to loose it and the archives seem to be not available. Could someone repost the name of the program or even better a link to it... thanks

1 0

Re: Cost of Ak manufacture
by alt1＠snowhill.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 11:20 PM 4/7/98 -0500, Igor Chudov @ home wrote: >Judging by their construction, there is not a lot of costs and they >should be a lot cheaper than AR-15s (against which I have almost nothing). > >So, the question is, it is realistic to expect that AK s will be >manufactured here? Will the control freaks be able to stop it? Two major problems. There is VERY little domestic manufacture of 7.62x39 ammo, and most of what is already out there is not reloadable. Even if AK clones became widespread, all the feds would have to do would be to ban the import of the ammo. Secondly, while it would certainly be possible for a manufacturing facility to construct an AK from raw materials, if "push comes to shove," it would be much faster and cheaper for people to "reconstruct" the Sten parts they have laying around. This has the added advantage that ammo is readily available for those. While 7.62x39 might become hard to find, the common US military and NATO calibers (7.62NATO, 5.56, and 9mm) will be widely available.

3 3