December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Learning time for you
by dlv＠bwalk.dm.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>From fiction!squirrel.owl.de!mix(a)golden-gate.owl.de Wed Sep 4 03:05:08 1996 Received: by bwalk.dm.com (1.65/waf) via UUCP; Wed, 04 Sep 96 06:45:37 EDT for dlv Received: from golden-gate.uni-paderborn.de by uu.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.061193-PSI/PSINet) via SMTP; id AA10409 for dlv(a)bwalk.dm.com; Wed, 4 Sep 96 03:05:08 -0400 Received: by golden-gate.owl.de (Smail3.1.28.1) from fiction with uucp id <m0uyC04-000JP6C>; Wed, 4 Sep 96 09:03 MET DST Received: by fiction.pb.owl.de id m0uyC1m-00005mC; Wed, 4 Sep 96 09:05 MET DST Return-Path: <mix(a)squirrel.owl.de> Received: (qmail-queue invoked by uid 200); 4 Sep 1996 05:33:42 -0000 Date: 4 Sep 1996 05:33:42 -0000 Message-Id: <19960904053342.25462.qmail(a)squirrel.owl.de> To: dlv(a)bwalk.dm.com From: Squirrel Remailer <mix(a)squirrel.owl.de> X-Comment1: This message did not originate from the X-Comment2: above address. It was automatically remailed X-Comment3: by an anonymous mail service. Please report X-Comment4: problems or inappropriate use to X-Comment5: <postmaster(a)squirrel.owl.de> Subject: Learning time for you Vulis, your comments include the following: >Comments: Dole/Kemp '96 and you have yelled about Harry Browne enough. LEARN TO SHUT UP! This is a Perrygram. Just can the constant noise for a day 'till I get back to my computer at home, where you are killfiled. Keep it down to a reasonable number of messages a day, or you will see others respond as you do.

1 0

{Rich Graves Only} Enclosed
by qut＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Newsgroups: alt.revisionism,alt.fan.ernst-zundel,alt.politics.white-power Subject: Re: Nomination: The Right Reverend Colin James III for Kook of the Month References: <gRqNTD2w165w(a)bwalk.dm.com> <50i362$71q(a)Networking.Stanford.EDU> In <50i362$71q(a)Networking.Stanford.EDU> llurch(a)stanford.edu (Rich Graves) writes: ! shlomo(a)bwalk.dm.com () writes: ! >The Right Reverend Colin James III got Andrew Mathis <fresh(a)jews4jesus.org> ! >fired from his second job in two months (at the Princeton Review, on Thursday). ! >I hereby nominate the dear bishop for both the Kook of the Month for September ! >1996 and for the Golden Killfile Award. Vote early and often! ! ! Vulis, you've already earned your Kook of the Month laurels. It's nap ! time. Since you know that is Dr. D, why did you blame the harassment of Ingrid on Rev. Ron?!????? It looks like you did it to pin it on the doctor, or more likely, you saw the opportunity to harass Rev. Ron, even after you feigned praise of him! It's the same damned header, IDJIT. Of course, I never saw the headers for the unidentified harasser to the Zgrams list, was that the same header, too? It looks like you did it or you know who did it and you want to compound harassment on to nswpp! How Gravesian! Is Dr. D your friend your talking about? Dr. D, defect, defect! He's a jerk, jerk! -- | | | | | | | | | | | | | | _|__|__|__|__ /--------------\ | | | 0 0 |--\ | * | | | \-------/ | | | \_____/ |__/ \______________/ Æ×õ áîšõä

2 1

Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
by Jon Lebkowsky 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 10:33 PM 9/3/96 -0800, jim bell wrote: >At 10:41 PM 9/3/96 -0500, Jon Lebkowsky wrote: >>The terms "responsibility" and "accountability" are misused, which is >>unfortunate, since I think we'd all argue in favor of taking responsibility >>for our speech/actions in a positive sense. The negative is in asking me to >>sacrifice my freedom because some few behave irresponsibly. This is like >>setting an illogical default, assuming that it's a preventive, but it >>prevents nothing. >> >>Getting beyond this discussion of EFF, has any global entity discussed >>making remailers illegal? > >The Leahy crypto bill introduced early this year made (paraphrasing) "the >use of encryption to thwart a law-enforcement investigation illegal." I >immediately pointed out that while this wouldn't make _encrypted_ remailers >illegal, per se, effectively it would because the moment an investigation >(even a phony or trumped-up one) is started and is "thwarted" by the >encryption used, the remailer operator became guilty of a crime. Is that true? Or is it that the individual user would be guilty of a crime? The real problem, to me, is that the remailer operator might be required to breach anonymity; cf the decision in Finland that led Julf to squash anon.penet.fi. -- Jon Lebkowsky <jonl(a)hotwired.com> FAX (512)444-2693 http://www.well.com/~jonl Electronic Frontiers Forum, 6PM PDT Thursdays <http://www.hotwired.com/eff> "No politician can sit on a hot issue if you make it hot enough."--Saul Alinsky

1 0

Re: Reputations
by Jon Lebkowsky 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 08:40 PM 9/3/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote: >And so on. Many of the debates about anonymity seem to ignore reputations, >filters, kill files. It is almost as if the critics of anonymous speech are >saying "If there is not accountability for restaurant recommendations, >we'll all be buried in garbage food." This ignores the _emergent order_ or >_evolutionary_ nature of actors in the restaurant and restaurant evaluator >market. Could be a lack of understanding of the possibility of authentication, which IMO can be necessary for 'reputation' to be viable. >Free speech is often messy. 98% of everything I read or hear is crap, to do >Sturgeon one better. But I use judgement to decide what to read, who to >listen to, and what to mostly ignore. I use _reputation_ to choose >restaurants, books, movies, speakers to listen to, etc. > >Sometimes I listen to anonymous speech, but mostly I don't. Pseudonyms take >a while to gather a "positive reputation," and some never do. This is the >way speech works. "Accountability" is a red herring. I wouldn't exactly say that...but it's more of a personal responsibility thing. Our model should be default acceptance of responsibility for words and deeds, but I see that as a personal issue, not a matter for 'enforcement.' -- Jon Lebkowsky <jonl(a)hotwired.com> FAX (512)444-2693 http://www.well.com/~jonl Electronic Frontiers Forum, 6PM PDT Thursdays <http://www.hotwired.com/eff> "No politician can sit on a hot issue if you make it hot enough."--Saul Alinsky

1 0

Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?
by Jon Lebkowsky 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 09:11 PM 9/3/96 -0700, Timothy C. May wrote: >Both terms are _overloaded_, probably to the point of not even being useful >terms for this debate. Everyone comes in to the debate with their notions >of what "responsible" speech is, what "accountability" entails, etc. > >Having said this, and not knowing how your (or anyone else's) definitions >relate to mine, I simply don't agree that I have to take responsibility for >all of my speech/actions. I can think of many cases where I have elected to >use untraceable anonymity, as many others have, so those are direct >counterexamples to your point, thus disproving your "I think we'd all argue >in favor of taking responsibility" point. The semantic point is a good one, but I'd like to see an example of a situation where you don't think you should take responsibility for something you've said or done. I'm not sure whether we agree or not on that one...it could be we're coming from different dimensions... >>Getting beyond this discussion of EFF, has any global entity discussed >>making remailers illegal? >> > >By "global entity" do you mean the U.N., or the Borg? The G7 issued a >typically vague statement about cracking down on terrorist >communications...this could be construed as the beginnings of an assault on >Cypherpunkish sorts of things. Too soon to tell. Well, we all know what the Borg think. I probably should have said 'governments' rather than 'global entities.' >Within the U.S. there are few ways remailers could be shut down, in terms >of legal action. The various Supreme Court cases have been discussed many >times. My real question is whether there is a real rather than possible legislative threat that demands action now. thx jonl -- Jon Lebkowsky <jonl(a)hotwired.com> FAX (512)444-2693 http://www.well.com/~jonl Electronic Frontiers Forum, 6PM PDT Thursdays <http://www.hotwired.com/eff> "No politician can sit on a hot issue if you make it hot enough."--Saul Alinsky

1 0

Re: Message Digest
by stewarts＠ix.netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 11:31 AM 9/3/96 -0400, you wrote: >> I'm interested in a 256 bits (or more) message digest algorithm >> (C source is better). Any URLs ? >Try HAVAL. It is a variable one-way hash function that is apparently secure >against collisions. It should be on any of the standard crypto FTP sites. Or there's the simple "MD5(x),SHA(x)", which is 288 bits long and has the advantage that the two parts have different characteristics and have been looked at (separately) by many people, so concatenating them should be fairly strong. Or "MD5(SHA(x)),SHA(MD5(x))" if you're paranoid. # Thanks; Bill # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com # <A HREF="http://idiom.com/~wcs"> # You can get PGP software outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto

1 0

Re: Workers of the Web, UNITE!
by Declan McCullagh 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Wed, 4 Sep 1996, John Doe wrote: > PLEASE TAKE ME OFF OF YOUR MAILING LIST... Never! Join us in standing up for collective rights and against corporate cyber-rapaciousness! In solidarity, Declan

1 0

Workers of the Web, UNITE!
by declan＠well.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Tired: Libertarian cypherpunks Wired: Crypto-socialists "Whether they be fast-food workers, word processors, or micro-chip assemblers, today's non-union wage workers need the IWW's brand of no-compromise unionism even more than their predecessors." :) -Declan http://iww.org/tandv.html > THE WOBBLIES: > > Tactics and Vision for a New Workers' Movement > > An Introduction to the Industrial Workers of the World (IWW) > > ISN'T THE IWW JUST FOR FACTORY WORKERS? > > Every worker is an "industrial" worker - whether they work in health > care, tourism, education, or publishing. The relatively recent > association between the word "industry" and heavy manufacturing is > misleading, and was never intended to be by the founders of the IWW. > If you earn your living by working with your hands or your mind, > then you're welcome in the IWW. Only bosses (defined as those with > direct power to hire and fire) are excluded from IWW membership. > > The Wobblies (as members of the IWW are known) have historically > focused on helping organize those workers that the American > Federation of Labor (AFL) shunned. In the early 1900s that meant > African-Americans, immigrants, women, and unskilled laborers. Today > that means curbside recyclers, non-profit staffers, temp workers, > sex-industry workers, co-op employees -- in short, any worker in any > workplace regardless of size or structure. > > CAN THE IWW HELP ME TO IMPROVE THE WAGES OR WORKING CONDITIONS AT MY > CURRENT JOB? > > That largely depends on you. The IWW is a "do-it-yourself" union, > and does not provide an all-knowing leadership or hefty treasury to > fight your battles for you. But if you're willing to organize at > your job-site by talking with your co-workers about the issues that > matter to them, then you can count on your fellow workers in the IWW > to lend their full support to your struggle. > > Individual workers can accomplish little by themselves, and are > liable to be fired if they raise their voice in protest. But by > joining together in a union such as the IWW, workers are far more > powerful when confronting their boss about workplace injustices. Our > union can provide tangible, community-based resources such as > low-cost printing, speakers, legal advise, and how-to manuals, as > well as bodies on a picket line. You won't get bureaucrats in suits > and ties telling you how to run your strike, just friends lending a > hand where they can. > > THE IWW AND MAINSTREAM LABOR > > For almost a century, the leadership of the AFL-CIO has worked hand > in hand with the capitalists to squelch rank and file militancy. > Their overriding concern has been "industrial harmony," not economic > and social justice, and so they fail to question the most basic > assumptions of capitalist production. While union bosses play golf > with the titans of industry, real wages and safety conditions have > continued to worsen these last thirty years or so. > > Regular AFL trade unions split workers up into their respective > skills, allowing one craft union to cross the picket line of > another. The IWW believes in "industrial unionism," organizing all > workers in a given industry into the same union (thus our name). At > a construction site, for instance, the carpenters should be able to > count on the unswerving support of the plumbers, laborers, > electricians, and hod carriers in the event of a strike. This is > much simpler when all these workers are in the same industrial > union, rather than separate, even competing, trade unions. > > Some Wobblies find themselves in jobs where they are represented by > these more conservative trade unions. These "two- card" Wobs often > bring their IWW principles to the union hall with them, agitating > for rank and file democracy, more militant "direct action" tactics, > and class solidarity. The IWW does not believe in signing away the > right to strike ( the so-called "no strike" clause), nor does it > condone the "dues check-off," in which management deducts union dues > directly from the paycheck. While the IWW often does strike support > for other unions when necessary, we also try to keep our sights on > the bigger prize ahead. > > DIDN'T THE IWW DIE OUT? ARE ITS IDEAS STILL RELEVANT? > > The IWW was nearly crushed in the early 1920's by some of the > fiercest repression ever unleashed by big business and the U.S. > government. Because the IWW had strongholds in industries that were > critical to the First World War effort, and because they refused to > do their patriotic bit by signing no-strike pledges for the duration > of the war, the Wobblies were branded "pro-German" and relentlessly > persecuted. > > The world economy has changed a lot since the days when the IWW > controlled great sections of the logging, mining, and agricultural > industries. Yet despite tremendous technological advances and the > structural reorganization of capital, industrial unionism remains a > fundamentally sound basis for workers' self- organization. Today, > while mainstream labor tries desperately to hold its ground against > the anti-worker policies of the ruling political parties, vast new > sectors of the economy have opened up that the AFL-CIO would never > dream of organizing. > > Whether they be fast-food workers, word processors, or micro- chip > assemblers, today's non-union wage workers need the IWW's brand of > no-compromise unionism even more than their predecessors. Winning > the eight-hour day was not enough. We must redefine the very meaning > of work itself, and find ways to redistribute society's wealth for > the benefit of all. > > DOES THE IWW SUPPORT ANY POLITICAL PARTY? > > The IWW is a labor union, not a political party. We believe that > economic justice must be achieved through economic struggle, whether > that be with our boss or our landlord. The institutions of > government have always proven themselves to be the allies of > Capital, so we do not wait for politicians to free us from wage- > slavery. We believe our power lies in the workplace, not in "the > vote" - since it is our labor on which bosses are dependent. > > The IWW has successfully resisted attempts by various "left" parties > to make the union a mere tool of their political ambitions. Our > Constitution explicitly states "the IWW refuses all alliances, > direct and indirect, with existing parties and anti-political > sects." This policy has helped us avoid the sectarian feuding that > can easily destroy a group. > > True, our commitment to worker control and the abolition of > capitalism has not won us any friends among the ruling elites, and > our disavowal of all political party affiliation has not prevented > us from being red-baited. We address the root causes of this > society's problems, and that makes us "radical," but we have the > common sense to leave our electoral political views outside the > union hall where they belong. > > WHAT IS DIRECT ACTION? > > The labor movement has been most successful when it relied on the > direct intervention of the workers to obtain their demands. Rather > than allowing professional negotiators to speak for them, Wobblies > have engaged in those tactics which they could control themselves -- > strikes, slowdowns, monkey wrenching -- what we call sabotage. > > Sabotage in this context does not mean arson and dynamite. It's more > properly defined as "the conscious withdrawal of efficiency." > Staying at your workstation but reducing your production by half > will bring a boss to his knees quicker than a whole team of > negotiators. > > The IWW has never advocated violence. By fighting for justice with > non-violent tactics, the IWW has often won the support of an > initially mistrustful public. > > WHAT IS A GENERAL STRIKE? > > The General Strike has long been touted by militant unionists as the > ultimate expression of workers' power, and it still plays an > important role in the IWW's program for social change. Simply put, a > General strike is a massive work stoppage on a local, regional, or > national scale, and may involve people either staying home or > occupying their workplaces and refusing to work. > > A General Strike halts business as usual, and serves notice to those > in power that those of us doing the work have the ultimate say in > whether that work gets done or not. It debunks the myth that power > flows downward, and proves instead that all real power still resides > at the grassroots level, if we only choose to exercise it. > > The general Strike is a common tactic in many countries of the > world, yet most North American workers are unfamiliar with it. This > is largely the result of the conservative trade unions' reluctance > to flex their economic muscle and rock the boat. A great deal of > education and organization must take place before North American > workers are ready to wage a successful General Strike, and it's > toward this end that the IWW dedicates itself. > > THE IWW AND FEMINISM > > Women have been active in the IWW since its inception. Elizabeth > Gurley Flynn, one of the union's best know agitators, once said that > "the IWW has been accused of pushing women to the front. This is not > true. Rather, the women have not been kept in back, and so they have > naturally moved to the front." > > Much of the work that has traditionally been done by women was not > recognized as such by the male-run business unions. The IWW supports > the right of homemakers, sex-industry workers, and other women to > organize for better conditions and wages just like other workers. > > THE IWW AND MILITARISM > > Wars between nations have never benefitted the working class, and > they never will. The war profiteers, safe in their mansions and > boardrooms, never consider the human cost of their military > adventurism. Working people are mere cannon fodder for their > corporate and imperialist ambitions. > > Real working class solidarity does not recognize the artificial > borders erected between nation-states, but instead unites against a > common class enemy. Poor people, especially those of color, make up > a disproportionate part of the armed forces, simply because few > other economic options are available. > > To put an end to war, working people must lay down their arms and > refuse to fight for their masters. Unfortunately, many have been > brainwashed into thinking that their interests are the same as those > of the people in power, so this is easier said than done. > Nevertheless, the IWW is committed to fighting patriotic propaganda > by educating workers about where their real self-interest lies. > > THE IWW AND THE ENVIRONMENT > > Bhopal, Chernobyl, the Exxon Valdez oil spill... These are just a > few examples of how dangerous it can be to put profit before people. > Government regulation and public outcry can at best slow down the > destruction of our planet, not reverse it. > > Workers and their families suffer the worst effects of pollution. > The workplace continues to be a very dangerous environment, and > working class communities are often the site for toxic dumps, > incinerators, and the like. > > Workers' control of all industry is the only practical strategy for > assuring the practice of sustainable and environmentally sound forms > of production. For if the workers in all polluting industries were > to withdraw their labor, the poison factories could be shut down in > a matter of weeks. The workers themselves must decide whether or not > what they produce is socially useful. > > JOIN THE I.W.W. > > NO BUREAUCRATS - Aside from the modestly paid General > Secretary/Treasurer, the I.W.W. has no paid officers. The General > Executive Board is elected annually by the entire membership, and > its job is to oversee the running of union affairs, not to set > policy. All officers may be recalled at any time by referendum. > > REAL DEMOCRACY - All policy decisions are made by the members > themselves by referendum. All branches maintain full autonomy on > matters within their jurisdiction. Job branches (I.W.W. groups > composed of workers at a single job-site) set their own demands and > strategies in negotiations, free of meddling internaitonals or > sellout business agents. > > LOW DUES - Our dues are structured on a sliding scale basis. > Unemployed and low-income workers pay $5 a month; those making > between $800 and $1,700 per month pay $9; members making more than > $1,700 per month pay $12 monthly dues; and workers in extremely poor > financial situations may pay only $3 per month. Initiation fees > equal one month's dues; so a very low-income worker can join for as > little as $6. > > TO JOIN - Fill out the questions below and send a copy of this form > with your check or money order (in U.S. funds) to I.W.W., 103 W. > Michigan Ave., Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA. > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > > ___ I affirm that I am a common worker without direct power to hire > and fire. > > ___ I agree to abide by the constitution and regulations of this > organization. > > ___ I will study its principles and make myself acquainted with its > purposes. > > Name ____________________________________________________________ > > Occupation ______________________________________________________ > > Industry ________________________________________________________ > > Address _________________________________________________________ > > City ____________________________________________________________ > > State/Province __________________________________________________ > > Zip _____________________________________________________________ > > Phone ___________________________________________________________ > > Email ___________________________________________________________ > > Total amount enclosed $__________________________________________ > > Initiation $_____________________________________________________ > > Dues $ __________________________________________________________ > > When you join the I.W.W., you'll receive a free subscription to our > newspaper, the Industrial Worker, in addition to your membership > card, constitution, button, and the One Big Union pamphlet which > describes the structure and function of the I.W.W. in detail. You'll > also start to get a monthly publication for members only called the > General Organization Bulletin, which contains Board motions, > financial reports, and members' discussion of various internal > matters such as upcoming referenda. And if you have access to email, > you'll be invited to join a growing network of Wobblies engaging in > on-line communications. > > IWW PREAMBLE > > The working class and the employing class have nothing in common. > There can be no peace so long as hunger and want are found among > millions of working people; and the few, who make up the employing > class, have all the good things in life. > > Between these two classes a struggle must go on until the workers of > the world organize as a class, take possession of the machinery of > production, abolish the wage system, and live in harmony with the > earth. > > We find that the centering of the management of industries into > fewer and fewer hands makes the trade unions unable to cope with the > ever growing power of the employing class. The trade unions foster a > state of affairs which allows one set of workers to be pitted > against another set of workers in the same industry, thereby helping > to defeat one another in wage wars. Moreover, the trade unions aid > the employing class to mislead the workers into the belief that the > working class has interests in common with its employers. > > These conditions can be changed and the interests of the working > class upheld only by an organization formed in such a way that all > its members in any one industry, or in all industries if necessary, > cease work whenever a strike or lockout is on in any department > thereof, thus making an injury to one an injury to all. > > Instead of the conservative motto, "A fair day's wage for a fair > day's work," we must inscribe on our banner the revolutionary > watchword, "Abolition of the wage system." > > It is the historic mission of the working class to do away with > capitalism. The army of production must be organized, not only for > the everyday struggle with capitalists, but also to carry on > production when capitalism shall have been overthrown. By organizing > industrially we are forming the structure of the new society within > the shell of the old. > > CONTACT THE IWW GENERAL HEADQUARTERS AT > 103 W. Michigan Ave. > Ypsilanti, MI 48197, USA > ph: 313-483-3548 > fax: 313-483-4050 > email: iww(a)igc.apc.org

2 1

Voting Monarchist?
by Bovine Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

unicorn(a)schloss.li wrote: <snip> >I hate lightning it's pretty, but it can be nasty. most pretty things can. > Vote Monarchist who is the candidate? LaRouche?

4 5

GAR [was:Re: What is the EFF doing exactly?]
by liberty＠gate.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Tim May wrote: ... >The reason this is such a hot button for Cypherpunks is that "responsible >freedom" and "accountability" are often code words for controlling some >very basic freedoms. Placing limits on anonymous speech would involve some >very fundamental restrictions on freedoms of various sorts. Even if >"safeguards" are built-in, the effect would almost certainly be to >illegalize remailers (unless they had "escrow" features!). Again, and as Tim is aware, this is not the true meaning of the fine old word "escrow," which as we all know involves neutral, trusted third parties. I think that this requires a new term, so I am now proposing one: "GAR -- Government Access to Remailers." In real life, the gar is a fish that lives in great numbers in the Everglades, just west of where I type. They can grow to a very large size. The fossil record indicates that this species has been around, unchanged, since dinosaur times. Keeping the Pinnochio tale in mind, I find it quite fitting that the gar has a *very* long nose in relation to its body. ;) >And a wide array >of other freedoms, too numerous for me to write about here. Indeed. JMR Regards, Jim Ray -- DNRC Minister of Encryption Advocacy "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech." -- Benjamin Franklin "As govt.s grow arithmetically, corruption grows exponentially." -- Ray's Law of official corruption. Defeat the Duopoly! Stop the Browne out. Harry Browne for President. Jo Jorgensen for Vice-president. http://www.HarryBrowne96.org/ http://www.twr.com/stbo ___________________________________________________________________ PGP id.E9BD6D35 51 5D A2 C3 92 2C 56 BE 53 2D 9C A1 B3 50 C9 C8 <mailto:liberty@gate.net> http://www.shopmiami.com/prs/jimray ___________________________________________________________________ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQCVAwUBMi12Nm1lp8bpvW01AQHHRwQAsr2a7rPwC9mfZ/ht2dF1jvRt/yuWJptL Utg1nm0YY5WrbvA12YAmkYBc4P7/xyqEARlIUWK3Z9qhcMFXjfXMRI5IwyfBmXSQ Ilra/XIUd6ES2p9jNupiKDO2yn56bpbubVS/T1QFkjRDgrLuRMEUndhNK8n5pGUA jL2L/IwMVCo= =seP6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0