December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

fake pgp messages
by hh＠xcf.Berkeley.EDU 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

in the process of doing stuff to fight traffic analysis, i need to generate a bunch of fake pgp messages. it is possible to asciiarmor random bits, but this is pretty easy to spot. does anyone know a good way to generate a large amount of bogus pgp messages? e

4 3

Number Theory
by Matt Thomlinson 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Peter Murphy writes: >... > >and see the major number theorist in this department, Dr. Keith Matthews. >He is a really nice guy, and is always interested in writing and/or >distributing programs for number theory calculations. He even showed me >one of his newest programs, and demostrated it by factoring 2^71 -1 for Is this really that impressive? MapleV and my 386dx-20 just factored it into 212885833 * 48544121 * 228479 in a matter of 23 cpu seconds. >he teaches, and could I post it to the list. Voila! Not only did he have >it printed out on paper, but he also mailed me the relevant LATEX files. way cool. thanks for the legwork.. >{Textbooks: Number Theory} >... >N. Koblitz, "A course in number theory and cryptography", QA3.G7NO.114, Speaking of who .. he's at my university. :) Nice guy; one of the people who offered to help me with the remailer situation last year. Funny thing; last year the computer administrators wouldn't even allow a copy of PGP to reside on their systems -- now it is part of their public account (student-run officially University unsupported software, usable by all). >H. Shapiro, "Introduction to number theory", QA 241.S445 1983, this isn't the Hawk Shapiro..? >D.E.R. Denning, "Cryptography and Data Security", Addison-Wesley, 1982, > QA76.9.A25D461982 sigh. mt Matt Thomlinson University of Washington, Seattle, Washington. phone: (206) 548-9804 Check my home page -- ftp://ftp.u.washington.edu/public/phantom/home.html PGP 2.2 key available via email, or finger phantom(a)hardy.u.washington.edu

3 2

Aliases (general case)
by dwomack＠runner.utsa.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Actually, it is legal to use an alias for any number of things, including the phone book, *_so long as the purpose is not to defraud_*; thus, using Mother Teresa Charities might be so construed, while using Sam Jones probably would not be. There are prohibitions against using false ID...driver's lic., passport, and so forth...but not against using an alias. This is all after consultation with my attorney... As a side note, it is possible in Texas to file an "assumed name" at the courthouse of the county(ies) wherein you plan to do business...costs about $15, including the notary fees, and lasts 10 years. You can have almost anything for a name....and what would be more natural than having your new "business name" in the phone book? Nice, legal...and cheap (except a business line is a bit more expensive). Can this be done in other states? Regards, Dave

2 1

licence plates seen
by tim werner 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Date: Sun, 24 Apr 1994 11:16:38 -0700 >From: mdbomber(a)w6yx.stanford.edu (Matt Bartley) > >I don't have an ASCII chart available. What does this one mean? If you were running Unix, you could have said 'man ascii'.

1 0

RE: Warrantless searches -- Sorry to start this again....
by tim werner 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Date: Sun, 24 Apr 1994 15:16:22 -0400 (EDT) >From: GERSTEIN(a)SCSUD.CTSTATEU.EDU > You see, Jim, the drug deals go on inside the apartment buildings. How >easy is it to do surveilance (sp?) on an apartment that is run by gangs, >surrounded by their other apartments, on floors that are run by the gangs? > > In many ways, the situation has gotten better since the searches >started. I AM NOT SAYING I AM FOR THE SEARCHES, I am merely saying that they >are being productive. I challenge you C'punks to come up with a better >solution. Given the circumstances that those involved are dealing with, it's >pretty good for now. Well, for one thing, if the drugs they are dealing were not illegal, there would be no high-anxiety drug deals going on in the apartments. tw

1 0

chip-0.1 / driver for MARALU chip-card-reader/writer v1.0
by schulte＠thp.uni-koeln.de 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I have placed chip-0.1.tgz on ftp.thp.uni-koeln.de(134.95.64.1):/pub/linux/chip/chip-0.1.tgz It contains an alpha version of a rudimentary loadable device driver and a sample application (get information out of the telephone cards used by the German Telekom) to be used with MARALU's chip-card-reader/writer. In principal, the reader/writer should be able to access all types of I2C-cards and other formats. I'll try to provide more functionality if there's interest in the net. Please mail comments, suggestions and questions to chip(a)thp.uni-koeln.de. If you don't have ftp-access, drop me a note and I'll mail the code to you (in uuencoded form (about 8k), if nothing different is specified). Martin PLEASE NOTE, THAT NEITHER I NOR MARALU TAKE ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FUNCTIONALITY OR RELIABILITY OF THE PROVIDED CODE AND INFORMATION. -- -- Mail submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: linux-announce(a)tc.cornell.edu Be sure to include Keywords: and a short description of your software. Ed Carp, N7EKG/VE3 ecarp(a)netcom.com 519/824-3307 an88744(a)anon.penet.fi If you want magic, let go of your armor. Magic is so much stronger than steel! -- Richard Bach, "The Bridge Across Forever"

1 0

Re: Warrentlesss SEarches (fwd)
by norm＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 17:21 4/24/94 -0400, Llywelyn wrote: ... > >Ok, Let me respond > ... >2)I know the value of a gun in this environment. I know how many times >our home has been kept safe because my father has been willing to wield a >gun against either intruders or against 'undersireable' characters coming >around(read drug dealers, crack heads, you name it). Our part of the >block has a reputation for not being somewhere for these pepole to hang >out because my father and our neighbors have taken a stand against such >scum. > ... >Any comments? Thanks for your perspective. I have imagined that if I found it necessary to live in such a place that I might favor choosing a building with some sort of covenant, explicitly agreed to by all tenants, that allowed searches for weapons. I take it that you would not find that to be a good idea. Do you have other ideas along such lines?

2 1

warrentless searches
by dwomack＠runner.utsa.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Adam appears to be of the opinion that we are a democracy...technically, we are a representative republic. A minor quibble, perhaps, but it leads to larger issues. The entire purpose of the structure of our government (seperation of powers, varied election schedules, powers reserved to the states, the bill of rights and so forth) is to prevent the suppression of the rights of a minority by the majority. At least, that is the ideal! Guarantees of freedom are not required for popular positions. Is freedom of the press required for journals extolling the "lovely weather here in our most perfect of all possible worlds!"? Hardly. Such things could be safely written in the most authoritarian society. The majority of the people in the projects wants warrantless searches....it seems so very reasonable to say, ok, the gangs are out of control, the majority wants these searches, lets just go ahead! But, remember, you still have a minority of people who *_don't_* want these searches and seizures. Are we, in the name of expediency, to abandon the rights of this minority? A minority neither of race nor of money, but of opinion? If the majority of people decide that ownership of firearms is counter to the interests of society, will we take away this option? If the majority feels that safety will be enhanced, are we to be required to carry "papers" everywhere? This is a slippery path...if the same majority decides that decent people don't need privacy, then the days of the Clipper debates will remind us of what we have lost. Let's really bring this home...if society decides that "old people", say those over 75, cost too much to keep alive, will we let the same majority invoke forced euthanasia? Why not, the *_majority_* is all for it! No Adam, I'm not accusing you of anything, save the most terrible action of all...the willing subordination of liberty for an elusive safety that probably won't come anyway. Keep in mind that there are antisocial acts even in totalitarian states. And, if the North Koreas of the world have less gang violence...are we ready for such a trade? Again, the elimination of hard won freedoms is a terrible price. I predict that within a decade we will all regret the first step we take toward abolishing the rights our founders willingly gave their all to win. regards....

1 0

RE: Warrantless searches -- Sorry to start this again....
by Black Unicorn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-> Well, for one thing, if the drugs they are dealing were not illegal, there would be no high-anxiety drug deals going on in the apartments. tw <- And if the government housing projects weren't there....

1 0

Re: Warrentlesss SEarches (fwd)
by Black Unicorn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-> Thanks for your perspective. I have imagined that if I found it necessary to live in such a place that I might favor choosing a building with some sort of covenant, explicitly agreed to by all tenants, that allowed searches for weapons. I take it that you would not find that to be a good idea. Do you have other ideas along such lines? <- I'm in the process of looking further, but the legality of this covenant is questionable.

1 0