October 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

NSA Turns To Commercial Software For Encryption (fwd from brian-slashdotnews@hyperreal.org)
by Eugen Leitl 28 Oct '03

28 Oct '03

----- Forwarded message from brian-slashdotnews(a)hyperreal.org -----

8 8

MQV -> was Re: NSA Turns To Commercial Software For Encryption
by Nymious 28 Oct '03

28 Oct '03

> ECC: "Our algorithm is so good it has been >licensed by the NSA". Yes. ... the MQV exchange is the 'best' authentication/key exchange protocol known. Using large ECC keys would hedge against even breakthroughs in quantum computing. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/

1 0

Re: "If you use encryption, you help the terrorists win"
by Major Variola (ret) 28 Oct '03

28 Oct '03

At 03:12 PM 10/27/03 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote: >spend pennies. Eventually you gotta figure that'll eat into the invasionary >funds, no? (Or am I being naive?) To a troll-like extent. The government left the gold (etc) standard so they could print money to fund wars. They will also not hesitate to confiscate more of your income to fund wars. And will confiscate your children (or you) as cannon fodder.

1 0

Re: "If you use encryption, you help the terrorists win"
by Tyler Durden 28 Oct '03

28 Oct '03

"YOU want to do the encryption, not the ISP who can be secretly subpoenaed to hand over the plain text." Well, that too! My point is and has been "crypto is econnomics" (to paraphrase Tim May during one of his moments of clarity). Better to get 'them' to get a subpeona and make 'em expend the effort (and $$$), just to find out the email's about Pamela Anderson's boobs. Or, better yet, to find out the enduser also encrypted the email (AND it's about Pamela Anderson's boobs). Even if they dig out the plaintext, let them spend thousands of $$$ while we spend pennies. Eventually you gotta figure that'll eat into the invasionary funds, no? (Or am I being naive?) -TD >From: Neil Johnson <njohnsn(a)njohnsn.com> >To: cypherpunks(a)lne.com >Subject: Re: "If you use encryption, you help the terrorists win" >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 11:37:47 -0600 > >On Monday 27 October 2003 10:53 am, Tyler Durden wrote: > > > > Hum...can an ISP offer encryption as a service? > > > > -TD > > > >Ummm, are we forgetting about the Patriot Act and siblings ? > >YOU want to do the encryption, not the ISP who can be secretly subpoenaed >to >hand over the plain text. > >At least if you get a subpoena you know about it. > >-- >Neil Johnson >http://www.njohnsn.com >PGP key available on request. _________________________________________________________________ Fretting that your Hotmail account may expire because you forgot to sign in enough? Get Hotmail Extra Storage today! http://join.msn.com/?PAGE=features/es

1 0

Re: "If you use encryption, you help the terrorists win"
by Tyler Durden 27 Oct '03

27 Oct '03

Nice! "You don't need to - just convince them that it is safe against casual snoopers (and to be honest, most "sensitive" email the government couldn't give a damn about, but your neighbours would find very interesting indeed :) As long as you get the desired end result (them using crypto) do you really care what they think?" Hum...can an ISP offer encryption as a service? -TD >From: "Dave Howe" <DaveHowe(a)gmx.co.uk> >To: "Email List: Cypherpunks" <cypherpunks(a)lne.com> >Subject: Re: "If you use encryption, you help the terrorists win" >Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 12:27:00 -0000 > >steve(a)njord.org wrote: > > On Saturday 25 October 2003 04:27 pm, Tyler Durden wrote: > >> secure (every ask anyone if they believed there was such a thing as > >> effectively 'unbreakable' encryption? Reglar folks always believe > >> SOMEBODY'S got the technology to break what scheme you use, so "why > >> bother"). > > I have a few friends like this....anyone have suggestions for ways to > > change their minds? > > Basically they say things like "If you think the government can't > > break all the encryption schemes that we have, you're nuts." This > > guy was a math major too, so he understands the principles of crypto. >Simpler solution there then is to say >"well, good - that means that the Government can still monitor terrorists, >but that the minimum-wage employees answering the helpdesk at AOL can't >read though your mail while they are bored." > > > I feel pretty confident that 2048 bit encryption is reasonably safe > > for now, but how can I convince others, and how safe should I really > > feel in that opinion anyway? >You don't need to - just convince them that it is safe against casual >snoopers (and to be honest, most "sensitive" email the government couldn't >give a damn about, but your neighbours would find very interesting indeed >:) >As long as you get the desired end result (them using crypto) do you >really care what they think? _________________________________________________________________ Send instant messages to anyone on your contact list with MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it now FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com

2 1

Re: NSA Turns To Commercial Software For Encryption
by Major Variola (ret) 27 Oct '03

27 Oct '03

At 11:00 PM 10/26/03 -0800, Morlock Elloi wrote: >Isn't it really simpler to use RSA and DH and ECC in series ? Why choose ONE ? >There is no good reason for that. 1. Silly Elloi, you can only use DH when both parties are online. And of course RSA and DH have similar failure modes -ie factoring. ECC may have similar failure modes with RSA/DH, I'm not sufficiently informed. A chain of different kinds of padlocks might look strong but they all dissolve in aqua regia. >Looks like PSYOP to me. That's an interesting explanation I hadn't considered in my previous post. (Sort of like putting a stone facade on that new iron bridge because some folks don't trust the newfangled iron bridges.) However using such keys are a heavy practical cost for PSYOPs.

1 0

Re: "If you use encryption, you help the terrorists win"
by Burning Cows with Strauss 27 Oct '03

27 Oct '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 25 October 2003 04:27 pm, Tyler Durden wrote: > Tim May wrote... > > secure (every ask anyone if they believed there was such a thing as > effectively 'unbreakable' encryption? Reglar folks always believe > SOMEBODY'S got the technology to break what scheme you use, so "why > bother"). I have a few friends like this....anyone have suggestions for ways to change their minds? Basically they say things like "If you think the government can't break all the encryption schemes that we have, you're nuts." This guy was a math major too, so he understands the principles of crypto. I feel pretty confident that 2048 bit encryption is reasonably safe for now, but how can I convince others, and how safe should I really feel in that opinion anyway? Steve - -- Steve Wollkind 810 C San Pedro steve(a)njord.org College Station, TX 77845 http://njord.org/~steve 979.575.2948 - -- All these worlds are belong to us, except Europa. Take off no zigs there. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/mwqO0uexoyuzySARApnNAKCUxOrLDh2gk1Ls5piL1zsnXzhHuwCfUW5l AYtOw2wfT0EqlvhWxo5rup4= =12ec -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

3 2

Re: Certicom? [...] [Fwd: NSA Turns To Commercial Software For Encryption] (fwd from harley@argote.ch)
by Eugen Leitl 27 Oct '03

27 Oct '03

----- Forwarded message from "Dr. Robert J. Harley" <harley(a)argote.ch> -----

1 0

Cypherpunks List Info
by cpunk＠lne.com 27 Oct '03

27 Oct '03

Cypherpunks Mailing List Information Last updated: Oct 13, 2003 This message is also available at http://www.lne.com/cpunk Instructions on unsubscribing from the list can be found below. 0. Introduction The Cypherpunks mailing list is a mailing list for discussing cryptography and its effect on society. It is not a moderated list (but see exceptions below) and the list operators are not responsible for the list content. Cypherpunks is a distributed mailing list. A subscriber can subscribe to one node of the list and thereby participate on the full list. Each node (called a "Cypherpunks Distributed Remailer", although they are not related to anonymous remailers) exchanges messages with the other nodes in addition to sending messages to its subscribers. A message posted to one node will be received by the list subscribers on the other nodes, and vice-versa. 1. Filtering The various CDRs follow different policies on filtering spam and to a lesser extent on modifying messages that go to/from their subscribers. Filtering is done, on nodes that do it, to reduce the huge amount of spam that the cypherpunks list is subjected to. There are three basic flavors of filtering CDRs: "raw", which send all messages to their subscribers. "cooked" CDRs try to eliminate the spam on that's on the regular list by automatically sending only messages that are from cypherpunks list subscribers (on any CDR) or people who are replying to list messages. Finally there are moderated lists, where a human moderator decides which messages from the raw list to pass on to subscribers. 2. Message Modification Message modification policy indicates what modifications, if any, beyond what is needed to operate the CDR are done (most CDRs add a tracking X-loop header on mail posted to their subscribers to prevent mail loops). Message modification usually happens on mail going in or out to each CDR's subscribers. CDRs should not modify mail that they pass from one CDR to the next, but some of them do, and others undo those modifications. 3. Privacy Privacy policy indicates if the list will allow anyone ("open"), or only list members, or no one ("private") , to retrieve the subscribers list. Note that if you post, being on a "private" list doesn't mean much, since your address is now out there. It's really only useful for keeping spammers from harvesting addresses from the list software. Digest mode indicates that the CDR supports digest mode, which is where the posts are batched up into a few large emails. Nodes that support only digest mode are noted. 4. Anonymous posting Cypherpunks encourages anonymous posting. You can use an anonymous remailer: http://www.andrebacard.com/remail.html http://anon.efga.org/Remailers http://www.gilc.org/speech/anonymous/remailer.html 5. Unsubscribing Unsubscribing from the cypherpunks list: Since the list is run from a number of different CDRs, you have to figure out which CDR you are subscribed to. If you don't remember and can't figure it out from the mail headers (hint: the top Received: line should tell you), the easiest way to unsubscribe is to send unsubscribe messages to all the CDRs listed below. How to figure out which CDR you are subscribed to: Get your mail client to show all the headers (Microsoft calls this "internet headers"). Look for the Sender or X-loop headers. The Sender will say something like "Sender: owner-cypherpunks(a)lne.com". The X-loop line will say something like "X-Loop: cypherpunks(a)lne.com". Both of these inticate that you are subscribed to the lne.com CDR. If you were subscribed to the algebra CDR, they would have algebra.com in them. Once you have figured out which CDR you're subscribed to, look in the table below to find that CDRs unsubscribe instructions. 6. Lunatics, spammers and nut-cases "I'm subscribed to a filtering CDR yet I still see lots of junk postings". At this writing there are a few sociopaths on the cypherpunks list who are abusing the lists openness by dumping reams of propaganda on the list. The distinction between a spammer and a subscriber is nearly always very clear, but the dictinction between a subscriber who is abusing the list by posting reams of propaganda and a subscriber who is making lots of controversial posts is not clear. Therefore, we tolerate the crap. Subscribers with a low crap tolerance should check out mail filters. Procmail is a good one, although it works on Unix and Unix-like systems only. Eudora also has a capacity for filtering mail, as do many other mail readers. An example procmail recipie is below, you will of course want to make your own decisions on which (ab)users to filter. # mailing lists: # filter all cypherpunks mail into its own cypherspool folder, discarding # mail from loons. All CDRs set their From: line to 'owner-cypherpunks'. # /dev/null is unix for the trash can. :0 * ^From.*owner-cypherpunks@.* { :0: * (^From:.*ravage@ssz\.com.*|\ ^From:.*jchoate@dev.tivoli.com.*|\ ^From:.*mattd@useoz.com|\ ^From:.*proffr11@bigpond.com|\ ^From:.*jei@cc.hut.fi) /dev/null :0: cypherspool } 7. List of current CDRs All commands are sent in the body of mail unless otherwise noted. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Algebra: Operator: Subscription: "subscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)algebra.com Unsubscription: "unsubscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)algebra.com Help: "help cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)algebra.com Posting address: cypherpunks(a)algebra.com Filtering policy: raw Message Modification policy: no modification Privacy policy: ??? Info: ??? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- CCC: Operator: drt(a)un.bewaff.net Subscription: "subscribe [password of your choice]" to cypherpunks-request(a)koeln.ccc.de Unsubscription: "unsubscribe <password>" to cypherpunks-request(a)koeln.ccc.de Help: "help" to to cypherpunks-request(a)koeln.ccc.de Web site: http://koeln.ccc.de/mailman/listinfo/cypherpunks Posting address: cypherpunks(a)koeln.ccc.de Filtering policy: This specific node drops messages bigger than 32k and every message with more than 17 recipients or just a line containing "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" in the subject. Digest mode: this node is digest-only NNTP: news://koeln.ccc.de/cbone.ml.cypherpunks Message Modification policy: no modification Privacy policy: ??? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Infonex: Subscription: "subscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)infonex.com Unsubscription: "unsubscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)infonex.com Help: "help cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)infonex.com Posting address: cypherpunks(a)infonex.com Filtering policy: raw Message Modification policy: no modification Privacy policy: ??? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Lne: Subscription: "subscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)lne.com Unsubscription: "unsubscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)lne.com Help: "help cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)lne.com Posting address: cypherpunks(a)lne.com Filtering policy: cooked Posts from all CDR subscribers & replies to threads go to lne CDR subscribers. All posts from other CDRs are forwarded to other CDRs unmodified. Message Modification policy: 1. messages are demimed (MIME attachments removed) when posted through lne or received by lne CDR subscribers 2. leading "CDR:" in subject line removed 3. "Reply-to:" removed Privacy policy: private Info: http://www.lne.com/cpunk; "info cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)lne.com Archive: http://archives.abditum.com/cypherpunks/index.html (thanks to Steve Furlong and Len Sassaman) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Minder: Subscription: "subscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)minder.net Unsubscription: "unsubscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)minder.net Help: "help" to majordomo(a)minder.net Posting address: cypherpunks(a)minder.net Filtering policy: raw Message Modification policy: no modification Privacy policy: private Info: send mail to cypherpunks-info(a)minder.net --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Openpgp: [openpgp seems to have dropped off the end of the world-- it doesn't return anything from sending help queries. Ericm, 8/7/01] Subscription: "subscribe cypherpunks" to listproc(a)openpgp.net Unsubscription: "unsubscribe cypherpunks" to listproc(a)openpgp.net Help: "help" to listproc(a)openpgp.net Posting address: cypherpunks(a)openpgp.net Filtering policy: raw Message Modification policy: no modification Privacy policy: ??? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Sunder: Subscription: "subscribe" to sunder(a)sunder.net Unsubscription: "unsubscribe" to sunder(a)sunder.net Help: "help" to sunder(a)sunder.net Posting address: sunder(a)sunder.net Filtering policy: moderated Message Modification policy: ??? Privacy policy: ??? Info: ??? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Pro-ns: Subscription: "subscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)pro-ns.net Unsubscription: "unsubscribe cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)pro-ns.net Help: "help cypherpunks" to majordomo(a)pro-ns.net Posting address: cypherpunks(a)pro-ns.net Filtering policy: cooked Posts from all CDR subscribers & replies to threads go to local CDR subscribers. All posts from other CDRs are forwarded to other CDRs unmodified. Message Modification policy: 1. leading "CDR:" in subject line removed 2. "Reply-to:" removed Privacy policy: private Info: http://www.pro-ns.net/cpunk

1 0

Re: "If you use encryption, you help the terrorists win"
by Major Variola (ret) 27 Oct '03

27 Oct '03

At 12:57 PM 10/26/03 -0800, Jurgen Botz wrote: >Wasn't there a Mafioso who got busted and convicted based on >evidence that had been PGP encrypted and where they stole the >key with a keyboard dongle? Nicodemo Scarfo. He used his Dad's federal-prison ID number, but the Feds couldn't guess that, so they blackbagged his computer with a dongle. I don't know who was lamer. It *is* a parable for our community; they could also have used videobugs. There was also, later, some dude who keyboard-bugged Kinkos and got caught. Another sermon from the mount. What *is* your threat model?

1 0