August 2001 - cypherpunks-legacy

Offender Registration: Duty to Register
by Anonymous 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

Offender Registration: Duty to Register DMCA Offenders and WIPO Offenders It is a crime to fail to register. If you have been convicted of a DMCA offense or WIPO crime, you may be required to register with local law enforcement under California law. If the offense was added to the registration law after the date of your conviction, you may not have received personal notice of your duty to register as a DMCA or WIPO offender. Check with your local law enforcement agency to see if the offense for which you were convicted requires registration. To register, go to the police department in the city where you live or are located, or the local sheriff's department if you are in an unincorporated area. If you have questions about your DMCA offense or WIPO conviction, or need to know whether your out-of-state conviction is the equivalent of a registrable offense in California, contact the DMCA and WIPO Registration Program in the California Department of Justice by e-mail at sotp(a)doj.ca.gov, or the address below: DMCA and WIPO Registration Program California Department of Justice P.O. Box 903387 Sacramento, CA 94203-3870 http://caag.state.ca.us/registration/index.htm

1 0

New Prestige & Premium Checks!
by Lisa Thornton 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

You are subscribed as: cypherpunks(a)algebra.com Good Afternoon! 1. New: highly attractive and secure Prestige & Premium check styles from G7 http://www.g7ps.com 2. Get your Executive Membership today and save on all your purchases of toner supplies, software and blank check paper! Click on the link below and then on the "Become a Member and Save" banner: http://www.g7ps.com 3. FREE Productivity Software in full retail packaging: ******************** a) eXpressForms "forms publisher" ($129.99 value) b) Fortune "relationship manager" ($149.99 value) c) DataScan "business card & contact list scanner" ($149.99 value) d) TransForm Suite "automatic form creation and text OCR" ($59.99 value) Pick up your FREE products at the web site specified below. Click on the following link for details and to order (or call the 800 number below) http://www.g7ps.com ********************* Please do not hesitate to call 800-303-2620 for any questions you may have. Thank you very much. Regards, Lisa Thornton Productivity Services Director G7 Productivity Systems, Inc. lisat(a)etransmail2.com 800-303-2620 To change your communication preference please click on: http://www.globalzon2k.com/scripts/mf_de.asp?e=cypherpunks@algebra.com or simply reply to this Email with UNSUBSCRIBE in the subject line.

1 0

JAG: The Show, The Cast and Crew, The Convention
by JAGnik 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

JAG has just been renewed for another two years. The fans are estatic. JAGnik's around the world prepare to unite for the second JAG Convention known as JAGnik Invasion 2001. Hosted by JAGnik Association, the convention will be held at the Four Points Sheraton LAX and will include Saturday sessions with the main cast, the guest cast, as well as recurring cast members. The Sunday session features the production staff of JAG and the Brunch with the Stars. For more information about the convention visit www.jagnik.com or call 1-800-701-2311. WWW.JAGnik.com contains tons of information about the show, the cast, the crew, the convention, including over 21,000 still images. Soon we will be featuring video clips of apecial appearances by the cast and crew of JAG. For information about the show's episodes use this link http://www.jagnik.com/show/ For information about the cast check this out http://www.jagnik.com/cast/ For information about the crew please use this section http://www.jagnik.com/crew/ For information about the convention look here http://www.jagnik.com/convention/ For information about the newsletter look here http://www.jagnik.com/news_views/currentissue/ Have fun!! We comply with proposed federal legislation regarding unsolicited commercial e-mail by providing you with a method for your e-mail address to be permanently removed from our database and any future mailings from our company. To remove your address from our mailing database please click the following link http://www.jagnik.com/remove.asp?address=cypherpunks@toad.com

1 0

RE: Bomb Law Reporter - special edition
by Gil Hamilton 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

Aimee Farr writes: > > It's also rather interesting that Aimee is objecting to > > people "cowering behind remailers". On the cypherpunk list? > > On the contrary, we should all be using remailers. Someone > seriously >does need to start a node which only accepts posts > > from remailers. I'm beginning to strongly suspect Aimee as > as troll. > >See Anderson v. Hale, N.D. Ill., No. 00-C-2021, 05/10/01 After two days of fighting with their Mickey Mouse software, I actually managed to track down this case on the web page of the US District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. While somewhat interesting with respect to the disclosure of personal details behind "anonymous" email accounts, it's got very little to do with the snippet above that it was offered in reply to. Cypherpunks remailers do not have associated account identity information as was being sought in this case (at least not to the extent that such information is associated with the sender of one or more particular messages). In fact, the "anonymous" accounts referred to in that case are/were not anonymous at all in the cypherpunkian sense and did not issue via remailers; those accounts are pseudonymous (like the account from which this message came [or the account known as aimee.farr(a)pobox.com? :]). This is why the people in that case really were "cowering" behind their "remailers". If they'd used cypherpunks- anonymous remailers, they'd be raising their middle finger from behind their remailers. Finally, if Aimee doesn't wish to be perceived as a troll, she really needs to try harder. Echoing calls for Choate to provide summary information describing the topics of URLs he forwards, I would like to ask Aimee to provide a synopsis of cases she cites here and preferably a few words on why she thinks that case is interesting or applicable to the current thread. Rather than just tossing the lawyerly pearls before us unappreciative swine. - GH _________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

1 0

Zim Petition
by Pieter Grobler 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

This is an apolitical endeavour for the sake of mankind and sanity. PLEASE DON'T BE PUT OFF IF YOU HAVE ALREADY RECEIVED A SIMILAR PETITION. DO IT AGAIN. IT'LL TAKE BUT A FEW MINUTES OF YOUR TIME FOR THE POSSIBILITY OF HUMAN RIGHTS BEING MET - IT'S THE FUTURE THAT IS AT STAKE. How to... To sign this petition, copy the contents into a new message. Remove any forwarded addresses. Type in your name at the bottom of the message. We must try to get a million copies of this petition to The President of the USA at the Whitehouse. Please would every 100th person forward this to the Whitehouse address: president(a)whitehouse.gov mailto:president@whitehouse.gov PETITION: Zimbabwe, "another jewel of Africa" is dying. Strangled by the corrupt forces,short sighted self serving policies of the ego-maniacal dictator Robert Mugabe. Freedom, human rights and sensibility has been extinguished. Zimbabwe is becoming an unstabilising factor in the regional politics. Only drastic measures by international democracies will be able to save Zimbabwe from damnation and prevent long term starvation and civil war in the region as experienced in the Congo. We have to ensure responsible governance for the people of Zimbabwe. TheInternational community pleads for support to save Zimbabwe: 1. The resignation of Robert G. Mugabe 2. Free and Fair Parliamentary and Municipal Elections 3. Non interference or escalation of regional conflicts. Removal of Zimbabwean Troops from the Congo 4. Restoration of Constitutional Law in Zimbabwe 5. Obedience by the government of the day to the laws of the country. We the undersigned support this petition Signed: 1. Mable Mbedzi, Zimbabwe 2. Leo Siziba, Zimbabwe 3. Eniah Khumalo, Zimbabwe 4. Tony Furman, Zimbabwe 5. Sue Cowham, Zimbabwe 6. Lesley Thompson, Zimbabwe 7. Cheryl Hannon, South Africa 8. Trish Gooch, Zimbabwe. 9. Dom Couve, Zimbabwe 10. Chris Malujlo, South Africa 11. Mark Norman, Toowoomba, Australia 12. Clive Law-Brown, Cambridge, New Zealand 13. A.F Strauss Hamilton, New Zealand 14. S.F.Fourie, Bellville, South-Africa. 15. P K Acutt, Durban, South Africa 16. M. McGreal, Durban, South Africa 17 brian draycott Durban South Africa 18 Sybilla Draycott Durban South Africa 19 G Appleford Hillcrest South Africa 20 L. Walton, Gillitts, South Africa 21 Steven Meyer, Cape Town, S.A. 22 Sandra Meyer, Cape Town, S.A. 23. Leigh-Ann Thomas, Edmonton, Canada 24 George Thomas, Edmonton, Canada 25 Tania Lewis - Burlington Ontario Canada 26 David Lewis - Burlington Ontario Canada 27. Malcolm and Debbie Jones - Oakville Ontario 28. Jeanette Budd - JHB - SA 29. Adrian Budd - JHB - SA 30. Debbie Lewarne - Zambia 31. Smith - Zambia 32. David Viljoen - UK 33. Kerry Viljoen - UK 34. Dayna Viljoen - UK 35. Shaun Jarvis - UK 36, Paula Jarvis - UK 37. Keegan Jarvis - UK 38. Hilary Rose - UK 39. Kirsten Rose - UK 40. Danny Rose - UK 41. Kamaria Rose - UK 42. Jess Watson - Zimbabwe 43. Sasha Spagnuolo - Zimbabwe 44. Shannon Watson - Zimbabwe 45. James Lamb ZW 46. Sharon Lamb zw 47. Stacey Lamb zw 48. Carla Lamb zw 49. Jessica Lamb zw 50. Leon Greeff - UK (ZIMBABWEAN) 51. Corralee Greeff - UK (ZIMBABWEAN) 52. Ilonka Bekker - USA (Zimbabwean) 53. Ryan Bekker - USA (Zimbabwean) 54. Isabel Codrington - Zimbabwe 55. Peter Vanderspuy - Australia 56. Dave Vanderspuy - South Africa 57.Alex Schon-South Africa 58. Thomas Manigk-Bremen, Germany 59. Sabine van der Linde, Erlangen, Germany 60. Human Bosman - South Africa Please would every 100th person forward this to the Whitehouse address as well: president(a)whitehouse.gov mailto:president@whitehouse.gov Find the best deals on the web at AltaVista Shopping! http://www.shopping.altavista.com

1 0

RE: Unsubscribe
by blue bird chemical 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

plz unsbscribe me from cypherpunks(a)toad.com.

1 0

Re: Voluntary Mandatory Self-Ratings and Limits on Speech
by Tim May 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

On Thursday, August 16, 2001, at 10:38 AM, Sampo Syreeni wrote: > On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Tim May wrote: >> Given the notion that a local community may ban certain items because >> they violate the "community standards" of the community, one is left >> with the inescapable conclusion that a local community could also ban >> Mormonism, or Catholicism, or any religious practice they deemed to be >> violative of their community standards. > > Not really. Most of the anti-porn crusaders base their rhetoric on some > vague idea of harm caused by the material. With most religions, you > cannot > easily draw the conclusion that they are harmful to the community. And > where > some people think you can, as is the case with Satanism and the lot, > one can > see that the public opinion already (mistakenly) sides with regulating > them. You're missing my general point. If you prefer that I not use "religion," I could just as easily use an example where certainly people of some community think that some otherwise-constitutional practice is "harmful." I shant spend my time here constructing examples. My point was the issue of "community standards" vs. a constitution which stipulates rights and places limits on government, not the issue of whether in fact Judaism is or is not more dangerous than "Debbie Does Dallas." (I know folks who think Judaism is in fact far worse, and who hope and pray for the day when 4 million Jews in Occupied Palestine are rounded up and liquidated. I take no position on this, except to think it deeply ironic that Jews frrom America, Ireland, Denmark, Argentina, etc. all decided to go to Palestine and kick Arabs out of land they have lived on for more than a thousand years, on the bizarre grounds that a) some desert mystic claimed that YHWH gave this piece of land to some tribe, b) that Jews in Argentina whose ancestors were mainly Spanish, European, etc. need their own space to do their thing, and c) that the "collective guilt" of Americans for somehow being mostly Aryans as Hitler was means that some "sand niggers" in Palestine should be kicked off their land in favor of some yentas from Brooklyn. It will serve the Jew right if he is again liquidated, at least the ones in Occupied Palestine.) >> We talk a lot here about the Constitution. Strange for two reasons: >> first, this is an international list, second, many of us are not >> exactly >> supporters of government in general. > > I dunno. Constitutions are meant to legislate the state where the rest > of > the law legislates the state's subjects. Not sure what you mean, but if I understand you, I strongly disagree. The U.S. Constitution is in fact a series of limitations on what government may do...including what it may due to its "subjects." The notion that the U.S. is a "majority rules" state is incorrect, at least in terms of what the Framers and the Constitution say. >> None of the proposals for "voluntary self-labelling" are actually about >> any kind of voluntarism except in the Orwellian meaning of the term. > > Naturally, but why not embrace and extend? The fact is, one of the > reasons a > good part of the CDA was struck down in the SC is the existence of > self-labelling technology. The next time around, it'll probably still > be a > good idea to have true, voluntary self-labellers around, if not else, > then > to show off that "self-labelling works". As Declan noted pithily, a slippery slope. We don't need a proposal for "voluntary self-labelling"...if it's voluntary, people can already do it. In fact, they already do. Of course, what people are now doing is not at all what the proponents of "voluntary self-labelling" apparently intend to be the voluntary labels. We all know where the slide down the slippery slope will take us. >> As we discussed several years ago when the CDA was being debated, there >> are profound problems with self-labelling. Some people will self-label >> "incorrectly" for various reasons. Much debated several years ago. > > Yes, I've gone through the archives on that, and plenty of other > sources as > well. Still, most of the critique is about why self-labelling will > never be > perfect. It does not render the idea completely useless -- I think of > labels > as metadata, some of which can be useful even if not perfect for any > given > use, filtering or finding hardcore S&M. Truly voluntary self-labelling, without imposed standards, is IPSO FACTO what we already have, right? If someone voluntary says their site is "hot" or chooses to say nothing, this is "voluntary." Right? > > As for misrating, that's a problem of reputation. If you can solve it > in an > anonymous economy, you can certainly solve it in a non-anonymous rating > context. > Actually, this is a separate topic worthy of more discussion that simply saying "you can certain solve it in a non-anonymous rating context." By the way, what does anonymous vs. non-anonymous have to do with truly voluntary self-ratings, that is, whatever anonymous or non-anonymous agents _say_? A voluntary system means an uncoerced system...this point explodes in too many obvious directions for me to even try to write about here, given the low level of interest in the discussion the two of us have been having. --Tim May

3 2

"Survey Says..."
by rout0016＠umn.edu 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

Do you like to eat? Then please go to <http://www.freeonlinesurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?id=1662> and take a short food survey. You can even help name a company! As a college student conducting this survey I would greatly appreciate your help, and it only takes seconds to complete. <http://www.freeonlinesurveys.com/rendersurvey.asp?id=1662> Thank you. Christopher Routhe, University of Minnesota student

1 0

Sorry to see you go.
by celebritymailer＠list.emailbucks.com 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

Dear Subscriber, Emailbucks has fulfilled your request to be 'unsubscribed' from our mailing list. We are sorry to see you go and hope to have you again in our upcoming projects. Because you were a part of our us. We are offering our CEN Girls In Private, but only for you! CEN is offering all subscribers & X-subscribers for our Private Teens Show at: http://www.privateteens.com/cgi-bin/click-pe.cgi?ebgone Featuring CEN's Staff Girls. Our Top 4 Girls: Most Wanted and Outlawed in 30 states! Amanda Nikki Nina Sammy Updated with new CEN girls every week! Ranging From USA - Amsterdam CEN's Private Teens are exclusively for all our CEN users, ONLY! Check it out here: http://www.privateteens.com/cgi-bin/click-pe.cgi?ebgone

1 0

One if by WLAN, Two clicks you'll sea... Gartner's heading to Boston
by ashley.pearce＠gartner.com 21 Aug '01

21 Aug '01

Priority Code: RA04E Dear Joe Cypherpunk: Imagine a wireless Internet that works better than the desktop LAN in your office wherever you need it. With the approval of 802.11 standards, the evolution of Bluetooth, 3G wireless services, and the availability of high-performance, low-cost access equipment for homes, wireless LANs (WLANs) have leapt from theory straight into the most exciting new high-speed wireless communication technology. Gartner's Wireless LAN Summit provides rational, unbiased and insightful research and analysis that underpin good decision making. Get on the fast track to receive immediate actionable advice, as well as information to lay down the roadwork for future results. For vendors, location owners, infrastructure providers and user organizations alike, this event is the only objective resource today for understanding what's really going on with WLAN technology and what it means for your business. Visit http://www.gartnerinfo.com/g.cgi/888020/31/us/wlan for more information and register today! Be sure to mention your priority code RA04E. Save US$200 when you register with payment by October 8, 2001: Go to http://www.gartnerinfo.com/g2.cgi/888020/31/us/wlan Call Ashley Pearce at +1 800 778 1997 or +1 203 316 6757 ************************************************************************* If, for any reason, you do not wish to receive future information from Gartner via e-mail, please send an e-mail to ashley.pearce(a)gartner.com If you have recently asked that your name be removed from our e-mail distribution list, please be advised that your request is being processed. We apologize for any inconvenience.

1 0