July 2001 - cypherpunks-legacy

Earn $10,000 a month...QUICKLY and EASILY !!
by Nick from England 15 Jul '01

15 Jul '01

You are receiving this email because you have either answered a classified ad, posted to an ffa page, are on the same opt-in list or have sent me something in the past. If you'd like to be removed, see instructions at bottom of message. My name's Nick, I live in England and I hope you don't mind me contacting you, but I've just discovered a FUN and EASY way to make EXTRA CASH FAST on the Net and I thought you might like to hear about it. I'VE EARNED $811.20 so far from this - averaging OVER $100 a WEEK !! I'm VERY happy to PROVE my income too. Please just ask. DID YOU KNOW that you can earn an EASY and FAST INCOME from the $35 billion a year Online Adult Entertainment industry ? Everyone knows there's HUGE money to be made and this company makes it's INCREDIBLY SIMPLE and VERY LOW COST, you honestly won't believe just how EASY this is !! I ONLY joined this myself in May 2001, and it's honestly the EASIEST way to make money on the Net that I've EVER found. This is a GREAT opportunity - DON'T MISS OUT - START EARNING TODAY - for full details please reply writing 'INFO PLEASE' in the subject line. There's NO RISK, it's INCREDIBLY SIMPLE and I will personally teach you EVERYTHING you need to know and give you my FULL SUPPORT for as long as you need it, to make sure YOU start earning some CASH very quickly. You earn 50% commission recurring EVERY MONTH ! AND you GET PAID every 2 WEEKS - Guaranteed ! This is an established, highly reputable company, with 6 years experience running adult web sites online. They are debt free, listed on Dun & Bradstreet and specialize in allowing you to cash in, fast and easily, on the exploding online adult entertainment business without any experience other than surfing the web. I apologise if you have received this in error. If you'd like to be removed, simply reply with REMOVE in the subject line and you will be removed immediately and receive no further mailings. This message is sent in compliance of the new email Bill HR 1910. Under Bill HR 1910 passed by the 106th US Congress on May 24, 1999, this message cannot be considered SPAM as long as I include a valid return address and the way to be removed.

1 0

[Announcement] Nov 1-2, The Human Face of Privacy Technology
by Robert Guerra 14 Jul '01

14 Jul '01

I believe this announcement might be of interest to the folks on here. <http://www.ipc.on.ca/english/pubpres/speeches/novcon01.htm> http://www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/conferences/2001/isw-eighth/announcement.… > 2001 Conferences 8th CACR Information Security Workshop 2nd Annual Privacy and Security Workshop The Human Face of Privacy Technology November 1 & 2, 2001 Centre for Applied Cryptographic Research (CACR) University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada This is the first announcement. Please pass this announcement to any colleagues who might be interested in attending. Updates, including the abstracts of talks and speaker bios, workshop program, and hotel information, will be posted to this web-site as the information becomes available. This information will also be included in the second announcement to be mailed on July 16, 2001. INTRODUCTION The 8th CACR Information Security Workshop: The Human Face of Privacy Technology will be held November 1 & 2, 2001, at the University of Toronto, Canada (exact location to be announced). This is the second annual conference jointly organized by the Information Privacy Commission of Ontario and the Center for Applied Cryptographic Research, University of Waterloo. WORKSHOP THEME: Cell phone users were recently outraged when their private conversations were streamed live over the Internet. Digital cell phone users became equally stressed when the wireless encryption standard - 802.11 they had been using to protect their conversations was cracked. Even more disconcerting, places such as Guatemala see human rights workers, using privacy technologies to protect other civil rights groups' identities and the information they report on civil rights abuses, experience daily threats of information theft as well as kidnappings. Within the last year those involved in developing and implementing technology have experienced a growing awareness of privacy risks within those technologies and a better understanding of privacy averse environments. This awareness has brought to the fore the need to further develop and implement technologies that are privacy protective. Parallel to this, around the globe, economic crime units and law enforcement agencies, governments, businesses and lawyers wrestle with the tools to combat the international specter of cyber crime, while often sidelining key privacy issues. The exploration of privacy and security issues is fundamental to understanding how the construction and implementation of privacy policies and technologies can be improved for the real world. This year's workshop will explore these and other privacy and security issues through a mix of traditional panel discussions and presentations as well as a Mock Cyber Crime Trial with audience participation and an interactive subject rights counter-surveillance event lead by Dr. Steve Mann, U of Toronto. The workshop builds on the comments and suggestions provided by last year's delegates and speakers who suggested a further exploration into both leading edge privacy and security technologies and an exploration of the context that these technologies work within. As a result, the conference has been expanded to cover two days, including parallel breakout sessions. Attendee spots have been increased to 210 to meet demand and more time for discussion and networking has been set-aside in the evenings. For early registrants a conference package will be sent out before the event that includes additional material on the conference objective, speakers/organizers and a detailed backgrounder for the scheduled Mock Cyber Crime Trial that will take place. The intended audience includes technology and security experts, CIO's, senior technology executives, cryptographers, engineers, law enforcement, academics, private sector leaders, privacy experts and students. Sponsors: * Alcatel Canada * Certicom Corp. * Communications Security Establishment, Canadian Federal Government * Information & Privacy Commission, Ontario * JetNet Managed Internet Services Inc. * MITACS * Pitney Bowes Organizers: ----------- * Mike Gurski (Conference Chair) Information & Privacy Commission, Ontario * Alfred Menezes Centre for Applied Cryptographic Research (CACR) University of Waterloo * Sherry Shannon Centre for Applied Cryptographic Research (CACR) and SVI Consulting Program Co-ordinators: ----------------------- * Pasha Peroff, Technology Policy Reseracher, Information & Privacy Commission, Ontario * Jason Young, Legal Dept., Information & Privacy Commission, Ontario * Robert Guerra, Director, Computer Professionals for Social Responsibility (CPSR) Speakers (Partial List): ------------------------ * Dave Banisar, Deputy Director, Privacy International * Dr. Ann Cavoukian, Information & Privacy Commission, Ontario * Jennifer Granick, Clinical Director - Center for Internet & Society, Stanford University * Scott Hutchinson, Sr. Prosecutor, Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General * Dr. Steven Mann, University of Toronto * Stephanie Perrin, Chief Privacy Officer, Zero Knowledge & Recipient of the 2001 Electronic Frontier Foundation's Pioneer Award * Ron Ross, President, Jet Net * Ari Schwartz, Center for Democracy and Technology * Lawrence Surtees, IDC & Network World columnist * Kristen Tsolis, Cyber Terrorism Researcher, US Navy Postgraduate School * Dr. Scott Vanstone, Founder & Chief Cryptography, Certicom Corp. * Minky Worden, Electronic Media Director, Human Rights Watch Workshop Program Day One 8:00 - 9:00 AM Registration 8:00 - 9:00 Continental Breakfast 9:00 - 9:20 Welcome from the Chair Ann Cavoukian, Information and Privacy Commissioner of Ontario. (cf) 9:20 - 10:20 Keynote: Re-inventing Privacy: Imperative for Human Rights Protection Stephanie Perrin, Chief Privacy Officer, Zero-Knowledge Systems. (cf) 10:20 - 10:50 Refreshment Break 10:50 AM - 12:00 PM Panel Presentation: A More Transparent Society: Perspectives on subject rights Dr. Steve Mann, Professor, Computer Engineering Research Group, University of Toronto. (cf) 12:00 - 12:30 (Lunch break) 12:30 - 1:30 Lunch Speaker: Democracy and Limitations on Free Speech and Anonymity Lawrence Surtees, Reporter - telecommunications and high-technology, Globe & Mail. (cf) 1:30 - 2:10 JetNet Presentation: The Challenges of Turning a Security Company in to a Privacy & Security Company Ron Ross 2:10 - 4:30 Cybercrime Trial: Jennifer Granick, Clinical Director - Center for Internet & Society, Stanford. (cf) Scott Hutchison, Sr. Prosecutor, Ontario Ministry of Attorney General. (cf) Dave Banisar, Deputy Director, Privacy International (cf) Kristen Tsolis, Cyber-Terrorism Researcher, U.S. Navy Postgraduate School. (cf) Technological Crime Unit, Commercial Crime Section, RCMP. (uncf) Arni Stinnissen, Electronic Crime Team, Anti-Rackets Section, OPP. (uncf) Allan Manson, Professor of Law, Queen's University. (uncf) 4:30 - 5:30 Conference Adjourns 5:30 - 9:00 Dinner & Entertainment A night of hot jazz/downtempo grooves by a local band (venue undecided). (uncf) Day Two 8:00 - 9:00 AM Continental Breakfast 9:00 - 10:15 Breakout A: Panel: Latest developments in privacy and security technology IBM Labs/Tivoli (cf) Dr. Scott Vanstone, Chief Cryptographer, Certicom Corporation. (cf) Breakout B: Privacy in the Workplace Mary O'Donoghue, Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario (cf) 10:15 - 11:00 Refreshment Break 11:00 AM - 12:00 PM Panel Presentation: Wireless Privacy, the Do's and Don'ts of wireless Ari Schwartz, Sr. Policy Analyst, Center for Democracy & Technology, Washington, D.C. (cf) Mike Gurski, Sr. Technology Policy Advisor, Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario. (cf) 12:00 - 12:30 (Lunch break) 12:30 - 1:30 Lunch Speaker: Protecting Human Rights With Privacy Technology Minky Worden, Electronic Media Director, Human Rights Watch. (cf) Amnesty International (uncf) 1:30 - 3:00 Breakout C: Critical Analysis methods for the Future: A case study of the cracking of the 802.11 encryption code Speakers unconfirmed Breakout D: XXX Peter Hope-Tindall, dataPrivacy Partners. (cf) U8TV 3:00 - 4:30 Concluding Remarks: Challenging Complacence Brian Beamish, Director, Policy and Compliance, Information and Privacy Commissioner/Ontario (cf) Alfred Menezes, Professor, Department of Combinatorics and Optimization, University of Waterloo. (cf) 4:30 PM Conference Ends Registration There is no registration fee for guests invited by the sponsors (Certicom, Communications Security Establishment, Information & Privacy Commission, JetNet, MITACS, and Pitney Bowes). The registration fee for other participants is as follows: * Cdn $300 (US $150). * For participants affiliated with an academic institution: Cdn $100 (US $75). Please register as soon as possible as space is limited for this workshop; registration is on a first-come first-serve basis. Please note that there may be an additional banquet fee of Cdn $30 (US $20) for all registrants who wish to attend the workshop banquet on November 1. Details will be included in the second announcement. To register, complete, in full, the attached REGISTRATION FORM and return it along with your payment to: Mrs. Frances Hannigan, C&O Dept., University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1. You may also register by email (fhannigan(a)math.uwaterloo.ca) or by phone (Frances Hannigan: 519-888-4027). ------------------------cut from here--------------------------------- 8th CACR INFORMATION SECURITY WORKSHOP REGISTRATION FORM THE HUMAN FACE OF PRIVACY TECHNOLOGY Fullname: _________________________________________________________ Affiliation: _________________________________________________________ Address: _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________ E-Mail Address: _________________________________________________________ Telephone #: _________________________________________________________ **Make Cheque/Money Order Payable in Cdn or US funds only to: CACR **Credit Card payments can now be accepted: [ ] Visa [ ] MasterCard Cardholder's Name: ____________________________________________ Card Number: __________________________________________________ Expiration Date: ______________________________________________ Signature: ____________________________________________________ -------------------------cut from here------------------------------- Accommodations The workshop will be held at The University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario. Each participant will arrange their own travel and accommodation for the meeting. There are many hotels close to The University of Toronto. A list of hotels will be provided in the second announcement. Travel The closest airport is Lester Pearson Airport (Toronto Airport). For further information or to return your Registration, please contact: Mrs. Frances Hannigan Department of Combinatorics & Optimization University of Waterloo Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1 e-mail: fhannigan(a)math.uwaterloo.ca Fax: (519) 725-5441 Phone: (519) 888-4027 -- Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. "The Life of Reason," 1906, George Santayana (1863-1952) -- Robert Guerra <rguerra(a)yahoo.com> PGP Keys <http://pgp.greatvideo.com/keys/rguerra/>

1 0

[healey@smyrnacable.net: [4phun] Massachusetts electronic surveillance law upheld]
by Dave Emery 14 Jul '01

14 Jul '01

----- Forwarded message from Vic_Healey <healey(a)smyrnacable.net> -----

1 0

[4phun] Massachusetts electronic surveillance law upheld
by Vic_Healey 14 Jul '01

14 Jul '01

BOSTON (AP) A rock musician who was found guilty of wiretapping after he secretly recorded police during a traffic stop had his conviction upheld by the state's highest court. Michael Hyde, 33, said he turned on his tape recorder on Oct. 26, 1998, after being pulled over by Abington police because he believed he had been unfairly targeted because of his long hair, leather jacket and sports car. Hyde recorded officers using an obscenity, asking him if he had any cocaine in his car, and threatening to send him to jail. They let him go without a ticket, but several days later, Hyde brought the tape to police headquarters to try to prove he was harassed. Instead, he was charged and convicted of breaking the state's electronic surveillance law, getting six months of probation. Hyde said the Supreme Judicial Court's decision Friday "slapped the people of Massachusetts very hard in the face." At Hyde's trial, police testified they pulled him over because of the loud revving of his car's engine, a noisy muffler and a broken license plate light. The court rejected Hyde's argument that the surveillance law was not applicable because police were performing their public duties and therefore had no reasonable expectation of privacy. "We conclude that the Legislature intended (the law) strictly to prohibit all secret recordings by members of the public, including recordings of police officers or other public officials interacting with members of the public, when made without their permission or knowledge," Justice John M. Greaney wrote in the majority opinion. In a strongly worded dissent, the two justices said the wiretapping statute was not meant to prevent citizens from recording an encounter with police. Chief Justice Margaret Marshall and Justice Robert Cordy used the famous videotape of the Rodney King police beating in Los Angeles as an example of a recording that would have been prohibited under Massachusetts law. Prosecutor Robert Thompson said the language of the law explicitly protects the privacy rights of all individuals, whether they are private citizens or police officers. Hyde vowed to continue his fight. "Right now I am looking for an attorney who wants to take this to a federal court," he said. "If I drop this right now it could negatively affect a lot of people." Copyright 2001 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Dave Emery N1PRE, die(a)die.com DIE Consulting, Weston, Mass. PGP fingerprint = 2047/4D7B08D1 DE 6E E1 CC 1F 1D 96 E2 5D 27 BD B0 24 88 C3 18

1 0

[4phun] Massachusetts electronic surveillance law upheld
by Vic_Healey 14 Jul '01

14 Jul '01

BOSTON (AP) A rock musician who was found guilty of wiretapping after he secretly recorded police during a traffic stop had his conviction upheld by the state's highest court. Michael Hyde, 33, said he turned on his tape recorder on Oct. 26, 1998, after being pulled over by Abington police because he believed he had been unfairly targeted because of his long hair, leather jacket and sports car. Hyde recorded officers using an obscenity, asking him if he had any cocaine in his car, and threatening to send him to jail. They let him go without a ticket, but several days later, Hyde brought the tape to police headquarters to try to prove he was harassed. Instead, he was charged and convicted of breaking the state's electronic surveillance law, getting six months of probation. Hyde said the Supreme Judicial Court's decision Friday "slapped the people of Massachusetts very hard in the face." At Hyde's trial, police testified they pulled him over because of the loud revving of his car's engine, a noisy muffler and a broken license plate light. The court rejected Hyde's argument that the surveillance law was not applicable because police were performing their public duties and therefore had no reasonable expectation of privacy. "We conclude that the Legislature intended (the law) strictly to prohibit all secret recordings by members of the public, including recordings of police officers or other public officials interacting with members of the public, when made without their permission or knowledge," Justice John M. Greaney wrote in the majority opinion. In a strongly worded dissent, the two justices said the wiretapping statute was not meant to prevent citizens from recording an encounter with police. Chief Justice Margaret Marshall and Justice Robert Cordy used the famous videotape of the Rodney King police beating in Los Angeles as an example of a recording that would have been prohibited under Massachusetts law. Prosecutor Robert Thompson said the language of the law explicitly protects the privacy rights of all individuals, whether they are private citizens or police officers. Hyde vowed to continue his fight. "Right now I am looking for an attorney who wants to take this to a federal court," he said. "If I drop this right now it could negatively affect a lot of people." Copyright 2001 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Dave Emery N1PRE, die(a)die.com DIE Consulting, Weston, Mass. PGP fingerprint = 2047/4D7B08D1 DE 6E E1 CC 1F 1D 96 E2 5D 27 BD B0 24 88 C3 18

1 0

You Have Been Sent The Best Porn On The Net!!!
by Best231＠porn.com 14 Jul '01

14 Jul '01

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (Best231(a)porn.com) on Saturday, July 14, 2001 at 23:59:55 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- : You have just received a site to the best porn on the net! We have porn for amateurs, lesbians, teenage, fetish. We have every kind you could dream of to spike your sexual fantasy. See sex with animals, sex with family. Orgys, blow jobs, rim jobs. You can see everything at the sites we have available. Simply click the link below and a list of sites will appear pick one and begin! < a href=http://schm0ker.indiporn.com/index.html>Click Here To Get The Best Porn On The Net!!!</a> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

CIA Wizardry
by John Young 14 Jul '01

14 Jul '01

Robert Windrem, national security correspondent for NBC, reported on July 12 about Jeffrey Richelson's new book, "The Wizards of Langley," on the CIA's deceptive technologies: http://www.msnbc.com/news/599637.asp Blurb: "Intelligence historian Jeffrey Richelson's latest book focuses on four decades of innovation and inside secrets at the CIA's Directorate of Science and Technology." Windrew describes one deception involving a faked satellite failure which apparently deceived Soviet experts but not amateurs who track sats. Publication date of Richelson's book is August 3 but copies are available early. MSNBC offers an informative series on "The Secret Empire: The U.S. Military in the 21st Century," which provides uncommon technological critique of the tools of war and espionage and their piggish industries. Far superior to the fluff being peddled by the agencies and their puff-ball hosts. Windrem is alleged to be the first to report on Echelon by name, purpose and field stations and fed earliest stuff to Duncan Campbell. He may someday republish his NBC reports of decades past on national security that are no longer available.

1 0

Community of Cyborgs
by Robert Guerra 14 Jul '01

14 Jul '01

The following might be of interest: http://www.existech.com/tpw/ http://www.eyetap.org/tpw/index2.php -- Progress, far from consisting in change, depends on retentiveness. Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. "The Life of Reason," 1906, George Santayana (1863-1952) -- Robert Guerra <rguerra(a)yahoo.com> PGP Keys <http://pgp.greatvideo.com/keys/rguerra/> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: cpsr_privacy-unsubscribe(a)egroups.com Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

1 0

Massachusetts Man Guilty of Wiretapping for Taping Police Harassment
by John Albino 14 Jul '01

14 Jul '01

Declan, Here's an AP article which appeared in the Boston Globe Friday. http://www.boston.com/news/daily/13/police_recording.htm The Mass. Supreme Court essentially says that it is illegal wiretapping to secretly videotape police officers harassing someone during a traffic stop. Wonder if using a film camera would also be wiretapping? -- John Albino mailto:jalbino@jwalbino.com ********* The opinion is here: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ma&vol=sjcslip/8429&… >GREANEY, J. This case raises the issue whether a motorist may be >prosecuted for violating the Massachusetts electronic surveillance >statute, G. L. c. 272, § 99, for secretly tape recording statements made >by police officers during a routine traffic stop. A jury in the District >Court convicted the defendant on four counts of a complaint charging him >with unlawfully intercepting the oral communications of another, in >violation of G. L. c. 272, § 99 F. The defendant appealed, and we granted >his application for direct appellate review. We conclude that G. L. c. >272, § 99, strictly prohibits the secret electronic recording by a private >individual of any oral communication, and makes no exception for a >motorist who, having been stopped by police officers, surreptitiously tape >records the encounter. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of conviction. >[...] > >During the course of the stop, which lasted approximately fifteen to >twenty minutes, the defendant and his passenger, Daniel Hartesty, were >ordered out of the automobile, and Hartesty was pat frisked. One officer >reached into the automobile, picked up a plastic shopping bag that lay on >the floor by the passenger seat, and looked inside. (The bag contained >compact discs.) At one point, the defendant stated that the stop was "a >bunch of bullshit," and that he had been stopped because of his long hair. >One officer responded, "Don't lay that shit on me." Later, another officer >called the defendant "an asshole." The defendant was asked whether he had >any "blow" (cocaine) in the car. [...] ********* The text of the statute is here: http://www.state.ma.us/legis/laws/mgl/272%2D99.htm >Except as otherwise specifically provided in this section any person whoª >willfully commits an interception, attempts to commit an interception, or >procures any other person to commit an interception or to attempt to >commit an interception of any wire or oral ommunication shall be fined not >more than ten thousand dollars, or imprisoned in the state prison for not >more than five years, or imprisoned in a jail or house of correction for >not more than two and one half years, or both so fined and given one such >imprisonment. ********* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

Massachusetts Man Guilty of Wiretapping for Taping Police Harassment
by John Albino 14 Jul '01

14 Jul '01

Declan, Here's an AP article which appeared in the Boston Globe Friday. http://www.boston.com/news/daily/13/police_recording.htm The Mass. Supreme Court essentially says that it is illegal wiretapping to secretly videotape police officers harassing someone during a traffic stop. Wonder if using a film camera would also be wiretapping? -- John Albino mailto:jalbino@jwalbino.com ********* The opinion is here: http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scripts/getcase.pl?court=ma&vol=sjcslip/8429&… >GREANEY, J. This case raises the issue whether a motorist may be >prosecuted for violating the Massachusetts electronic surveillance >statute, G. L. c. 272, § 99, for secretly tape recording statements made >by police officers during a routine traffic stop. A jury in the District >Court convicted the defendant on four counts of a complaint charging him >with unlawfully intercepting the oral communications of another, in >violation of G. L. c. 272, § 99 F. The defendant appealed, and we granted >his application for direct appellate review. We conclude that G. L. c. >272, § 99, strictly prohibits the secret electronic recording by a private >individual of any oral communication, and makes no exception for a >motorist who, having been stopped by police officers, surreptitiously tape >records the encounter. Accordingly, we affirm the judgments of conviction. >[...] > >During the course of the stop, which lasted approximately fifteen to >twenty minutes, the defendant and his passenger, Daniel Hartesty, were >ordered out of the automobile, and Hartesty was pat frisked. One officer >reached into the automobile, picked up a plastic shopping bag that lay on >the floor by the passenger seat, and looked inside. (The bag contained >compact discs.) At one point, the defendant stated that the stop was "a >bunch of bullshit," and that he had been stopped because of his long hair. >One officer responded, "Don't lay that shit on me." Later, another officer >called the defendant "an asshole." The defendant was asked whether he had >any "blow" (cocaine) in the car. [...] ********* The text of the statute is here: http://www.state.ma.us/legis/laws/mgl/272%2D99.htm >Except as otherwise specifically provided in this section any person whoª >willfully commits an interception, attempts to commit an interception, or >procures any other person to commit an interception or to attempt to >commit an interception of any wire or oral ommunication shall be fined not >more than ten thousand dollars, or imprisoned in the state prison for not >more than five years, or imprisoned in a jail or house of correction for >not more than two and one half years, or both so fined and given one such >imprisonment. ********* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0