April 2001 - cypherpunks-legacy

amipro code
by Zeligus666＠aol.com 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

go to me and my brothers site astalavista.com and search for the crack

1 0

April 2001 Go!Zilla Newsletter
by newsletter＠gozilla.com 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

----------------------------------------------------------------------- Go!Zilla Newsletter April 2001 ----------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------- In this Issue: 1. Go!Zilla Product News 2. Technology Unleased: Understanding Security Certificates 3. Game Review: The Sims House Party ----------------------------------------------------------------------- GO!ZILLA PRODUCT NEWS ----------------------------------------------------------------------- - VERSION 4.0 COMING SOON - Our engineering team is hard at work putting the finishing touches on Go!Zilla v4.0! The new version will be packed with new features, giving you the fastest and most powerful download manager ever. We can't spoil everything, but keep an eye out for multi-part downloads and more coming soon! - UPGRADE TO GO!ZILLA PLUS AND GET v4.0 FREE - Upgrade from Go!Zilla Free to Go!Zilla Plus with Upgrade Subscription, and you'll receive a full registered copy of v4.0 when it's released in the next few weeks. Just follow the link below, and be sure to choose the UPGRADE SUBSCRIPTION checkbox -- you'll get Go!Zilla v4.0 PLUS any additonal releases that come out for the next 12 months. Upgrade today at: http://www.gozilla.com/download_plus.html - SEARCH - If you haven't been by gozilla.com in a while, be sure to check it out! There have been several new additions, including Go!Zilla Search - a powerful search engine that lets you find all sort of digital files: video, music, software and more, with just a few clicks. Check it out at: http://search.gozilla.com/ - CLASSIC - For die-hard Go!Zilla users version 3.5 has returned! It is now available without advertising for $9.95. No ads, less than 10 bucks, and all the downloading power that made Go!Zilla famous-good times are here again! Get it now: http://www.gozilla.com/download_classic.html ***ADVERTISEMENT************************************************* * Unleash the power of your bookmarks! Add, organize, share, * discover, and surf the Web's best bookmarks with BLINK. * Click below to experience BLINK * http://click.linksynergy.com/fs-bin/stat?id=OkGdtrcRNmk&offerid=26952.10000… ***************************************************************** ----------------------------------------------------------------------- TECHNOLOGY UNLEASHED: UNDERSTANDING SECURITY CERTIFICATES ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Are your customers confident that you are who you say you are? One of the major problems with the Internet is the ease with which someone can fake their identity. I could masquerade as anyone I please, including you, your friend or a bank. Resolving identities was difficult and easy to jeopardize. But the concept of a certificate changed that. A certificate is a specifically formatted document that allows you to authenticate, or identify, yourself to a web-browser, e-mail reader or a secure server. It contains information on who you are and who issued the certificate. The certificate also contains your public key. In the current application of certificates, the most common commercial usage of certification is in the realm of Secure Servers. By using the SSL protocol (Secure Socket Layer), servers use public-private keys to create secure connections with web-browsers, allowing them to transmit secure information across the insecure Internet. By reading and trusting the certificate the web-browser can see that the company is who they say they are. This prevents situations where a company poses as a bank, for example, and gets credit-card details and fund-transfer details from unsuspecting customers. Click here to test-drive this technology for FREE! http://www.thawte.com/ucgi/gothawte.cgi?a=n128131930105000 If you would like more information on SSL Certificates please contact me at: traceys(a)thawte.com ----------------------------------------------------------------------- GAME REVIEW: THE SIMS-HOUSE PARTY ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Get the hottest house party in town with the new release of the Sims: House Party. Choose from three themes--jungle, country western, and underground rave--each of which has its own distinctive furniture and style. Hundreds of new objects that have some functionality are available, including women (or men, depending on your preference) who pop out of cakes during birthday a birthday party. The Sims can grow tiresome for some, but running a virtual dollhouse does have it's moments. This is a great way to throw the party you?ve always wanted-without the messy clean up. And is a fun add-on for the true Sim-Head. If you don't know what The Sims are, then you are WAY behind on the times. Check out House Party and the rest of the Sim-fun at: http://www.thesims.com/ ***ADVERTISEMENT******************************************************* * TIRED of the ad banners inside Go!Zilla? Click here to buy * Go!Zilla Plus and never see them again: * http://www.gozilla.com/download_plus.html *********************************************************************** Copyright (c) 2001 Radiate, Inc. All Rights Reserved. Go!Zilla is a trademark of Radiate, Inc. Other companies, products, or services may be trademarks or service marks of others and are referenced for informational purposes only. ----------------------------------------------------------------- You have received this mailing because you have chosen to recieve Go!Zilla-related updates and newsletters. If you wish to unsubscribe from this mailing, please click on the following link to be unsubscribed immediately. http://listserv.gozilla.com/users/unsubscribe.php?user_id=987913&email=cyph…

1 0

RE: Did you ever notice?...
by Aimee Farr 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

Jim said: > I've spent several hundred dollars having different lawyers review this > suggestion and each has said it is legal. Not one of them liked it > however. You are of course welcome to your own opinion. Now THAT is FUNNY. ~Aimee

3 3

Libertarian Party of Washington State Fed Infiltration
by Matthew Gaylor 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

[Note from Matthew Gaylor: Declan McCullagh is Wired News's Washington, DC Bureau Chief and is in Washington State testifying at the Jim Bell trial. Below is a message Declan sent to me concerning an invitation I sent to Freematt's Alerts and to a few other net mailing lists about the restart of Seattle cypherpunks meetings. The infiltration of political groups is nothing new going back as far as nations have had secret police forces. In the late 1980s and early 90s I served as a local Libertarian Party chairman in Ohio (Columbus). Several strange happenings made be suspicious of several people that were active in the party. Suspicious enough that it prompted me to file FOIA requests with the FBI. After the usual several year process I was declined info about spying on the Libertarian Party- But the FBI did confirm that by releasing the records they did have would have violated the privacy of a third party (The informant). And yes I think I know who it is and no I won't say because I can't be 100 percent sure. I have managed to unmask informants and out right agents, once at a machine gun shoot in Knob Creek, KY and once at another local civil rights organization. I'll be writing a more lengthy response to this.] At 9:28 PM -0400 4/3/01, Declan McCullagh wrote: >Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:28:29 -0400 >From: Declan McCullagh <declan(a)well.com> >To: Alan Olsen <alan(a)clueserver.org> >Cc: Matthew Gaylor <freematt(a)coil.com>, cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net >Subject: Re: Seattle cypherpunks group >Mail-Followup-To: Alan Olsen <alan(a)clueserver.org>, > Matthew Gaylor <freematt(a)coil.com>, cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net >User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.2i >X-News-Site: http://www.wired.com/ >X-URL: http://www.mccullagh.org/ >Sender: declan(a)cluebot.com > >Why not ask IRS Agent Jeff Gordon to be your guest speaker? The Feds >are certain to have someone in attendance. > >During today's opening remarks by the prosecution (took almost an hour), >we learned that the Feds had an agent who infiltrated Bell's common >law court and was far more active than Bell, voting to convict Janet >Reno in absentia etc. The same guy also appeared to infiltrate the >Libertarian Party of Washington state. Cypherpunks and AP play a key >role of the government's case, with Tim May and Eric Hughes being >mentioned, and this is just Day One. > >Don't mean to tease, more on this after I finish my writeup. > >-Declan ************************************************************************** Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: freematt(a)coil.com with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week) Matthew Gaylor, 2175 Bayfield Drive, Columbus, OH 43229 (614) 313-5722 ICQ: 106212065 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/ **************************************************************************

3 3

Re: Did you ever notice?...
by Jim Choate 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

Realy only the Supreme Court, they'd look pretty silly ruling against the line; No people, the Supreme Court is more authoritative than the Constitution. My suggestion, not being a lawyer, would be that when one were arraigned you demand a lawyer and a 'whatever the legal term is for a time-out' so that you could submit procedural issues to the Supreme Court related to the fundamental legal process and its Constitutionality (the court appointed attorney, however crappy, should know this process). Be sure to send all the bills to the prosecutors office for payment as well. You reallly don't have to worry in the long run about them confiscating your property, the Constitution says private property taken for public use must be compensated for. Determining if the legal system is constitutional is clearly a 'public use' with respect to confiscated property. But the reality is we don't really have to worry at all about what they think/want. It's supposed to be openly confrontational. Fuck the bastards. It ain't like you're a federaly owned nigger or something. And you sure as hell don't owe them an accounting until after you've been found guilty by a jury of commiting some crime. And even then they must respect ALL your civil liberties since they don't come from the government in the first place (eg see 1st). Here's my plan...;) It is clear that since the Civil War the influence of the states has wained. As a result we've seen an immense, and now clearly unwanted, growth in fascist/socialist and now free-market/libertarian views at the federal level. Views in fact fed by the statistical mechanics of spin doctor journalism based on 'surveys' (as if might makes right). Look at the hue and cry over the New Deal being 'socialist' and this was roughly 60 years ago? And we de-cry the press manipulation of the Chinese over the recent aircraft fiasco? Pot, Kettle... So we need to come up with a way such that the States can re-take their role as 'relief' driver/brakeman on the wagon train we call America. The people are the horses, by the way (just because we're in charge doesn't mean we get to sit on our asses - damned puritan work ethic :) In each state a group of citizens forms with the express intent of developing potential constitutional amendments and assisting in the election of poly-partisan state representatives who will accept such amendments for review. The point is to get people elected who are favorable to receiving these sorts of public input, not to elect persons of a certain view. Each individual state group works in concert with the n-1 state groups through some 'national caucus' where the actual submitted amendments would be filtered and 'homogenized'. Then they would be submitted to each of the states for review and disposition. Note that the actual text would in all cases be exactly the same, there is a real issue over verbage with respect to amendments. Best to avoid the litmus test since it isn't covered in the DoI or the C. The states, through a 3/4 majority can amend the Constiution without federal involvement of any kind. The bastards just get up one morning and have a new hoop to jump through. Through this mechanism any activity of the federals could be countered in short order. In a critical and widely held case possibly as little as 30 days. Hell, the fed's can't wipe their ass that fast from a precedural point of view. The fact is that all amendments to date have come through Congress. Every time the states have started a movement Congress has taken it up. I've spent several hundred dollars having different lawyers review this suggestion and each has said it is legal. Not one of them liked it however. You are of course welcome to your own opinion. On Wed, 4 Apr 2001, J.A. Terranson wrote: > Hrmmm... You think you could convince the USG? ____________________________________________________________________ Beware gentle knight, there is no greater monster than reason. Miguel de Cervantes The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Re: Re: Affording an attorney...
by snit 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

At 11:33 PM 4/4/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote: >On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, snit wrote: > > > and that defense attorney is worth exactly squat. > >Doesn't need to be. > >He's there to help advise process and make sure papers get fuiled in an >acceptable manner. He isn't there to defend you per se, that's your job >under the 1st and 5th. spoken by someone who has clearly never even tried to use the "services" of a public defender. heh. break the cycle choate. snit

1 0

Looking for qualified IT professionals?
by latestandgreatest2＠hrpromotions.com 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

1 0

Re: Re: Affording an attorney...
by snit 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

At 10:34 PM 4/4/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote: <snippage> > Amendment X > >The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor >prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or >to the people. > >Now the state is REQUIRED to demonstrate through some clause (ie delegate) >in the Constitution that the defendent MUST show financial disability? >Haven't we already demonstrated that there is no such clause above? > >Hence, the state is required to provide an attorney for every person who >is accussed of a crime. No exceptions, no test, no if's, no and's, no >but's. and that defense attorney is worth exactly squat. snit

2 1

Affording an attorney...
by Jim Choate 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

Note that there's NO stipulation about 'if you can't afford an attorney one will be appointed to you'. Whether you're rich or poor the state is OBLIGED to provide you an attorney. Amendment VI In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence. ____________________________________________________________________ Beware gentle knight, there is no greater monster than reason. Miguel de Cervantes The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

7 10

Pointy-headedness
by Jimmy Inchoate 05 Apr '01

05 Apr '01

You really don't get the pats on the head that you crave, do you, Jim? >At 7:24 AM 4/4/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote: >Well, at least thank you for honestly admitting my points and view are >valid and legitimate. ... >At 10:36 PM 4/4/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote: >Which proves my main point. ... >At 10:35 PM 4/4/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote: >Which clearly demonstates my main point. ____________________________________________________________________ Reminder: insert quote here that makes me look clever and well-read. _(__)_ V '-e e -'__,--.__) The Armored Dildo Group (o_o) ) Jimmy Inchoate \. /___. | ravaged(a)homebase.cryptofortress.com ||| _)/_)/ o //_(/_(/_( ooo --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0