- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

My Absence
by nate＠VIS.ColoState.EDU 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hey guys. I have been gone for a few weeks now, taking care of lots of personal business. I thought I might tell you that I am dropping my netcom account as of the 15th of may, so please start sending mail to nate(a)vis.colostate.edu again (yeah, yeah, don't whine) -nate -- +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+ | Nate Sammons <nate(a)VIS.ColoState.Edu> <nate(a)yuma.ANCS.ColoState.Edu> | | Colorado State University Computer Visualization Laboratory | | Data Visualization/Interrogation, Modeling, Animation, Rendering | +-----------------------------------------------------------------------+

1 0

away from my mail (fwd)
by Ed Carp 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I sent Phil a copy of my patches to get pgp-2.3a to build under Solaris 2.2 with gcc-2.5.8, and this is what I got in return: From: via the vacation program <prz(a)columbine.cgd.ucar.EDU> Subject: away from my mail I will not be reading my mail for a while. I am on travel until Wednesday, 11 May 94. This canned message was generated automatically by the "vacation" program, but my business trip is not a vacation. Your mail regarding "pgp-2.3A diffs to compile under Solaris 2.2 with gcc-2.5.8" will be read when I return. Also, in case you are still using my old email address, please update your records to use only my current email address, which is prz(a)acm.org. In case you haven't heard, MIT is releasing PGP version 2.5, available from an FTP site at MIT, for US noncommercial users only. It is a nice version of PGP, with all the strength and integrity of PGP 2.3a, with some bug fixes and improvements. -Philip Zimmermann

1 0

Re: NYT op-ed May 8
by ABROUARD＠antioc.antioch.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

David Gelertner's NYT op ed piece seemed to suggest that the government would gain no new information if the digital telephony bill is passed. Quite obviously the ability to automatically scan for what one is interested in would be a tremendous boon to various agencies info gathering projects. Even Gelernter must realize how hollow his reasoning sounds. It makes one wonder what sort of critical thinking they're teaching at Yale these days - or perhaps in whose pocket he's comfortably ensconsed. Andrew Brouard abrouard(a)chaos.antioch.edu

1 0

Re: This is an abstract from a talk at Cornell University...
by Hal 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: jamesd(a)netcom.com (James A. Donald) > Peter Wayner writes > > Richard Feynman and others have challenged the traditional Turing > > machine model of computation. A new model of computation based > > on quantum mechanics has recently been proposed. It is too early > > to know whether quantum computers will be practical. However, it > > is shown that quantum computers can factor integers and compute > > discrete logarithms in polynomial time. > > It is news to me that a quantum computer can do this, but > is seems plausible that it could. > > Factoring is a member of a class of problems for which it > is plausible that quantum computers have capabilities > fundamentally superior to classical computers. I would be surprised if quantum computers had the capability to factor in polynomial time. The special capabilities that I have seen claimed for quantum computers have a probabilistic component, so that, in effect, you can do a calculation n times faster but have only a 1/n chance of getting an answer. (This is an oversimplification but gives the idea.) In the context of the Many-Worlds interpretation of QM, you might say that the various instances of the quantum computer spanning the multi- verse can be made to work together, but by a sort of conservation of information production, only a fraction of the individual universes of the multiverse get the answer. The one loophole that I see is that this term "quantum computer" covers a lot of territory. They might sneak in some infinities in addition to adding the strictly quantum capabilities. It is known that ordinary computers which can hold arbitrarily-large numbers (and do arithmetic on them in one time step) can factor in polynomial time. If the definition of your quantum computer is so broad that you can squeeze in some outrageous capability like this, then the claim of polynomial-time factoring is more plausible. Hal

1 0

Re: [ Secure Mosaic]
by Jack Bzoza 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Tue, 26 Apr 1994, Augustine Lo wrote: > To successfully combine simplicity of operation and key administration > functions with a high level of security that can be accessible to even > non-sophisticated users, significant changes were necessary for > existing WWW security protocols. EIT developed a new protocol called > Secure-HTTP for dealing with a full range of modern cryptographic > algorithms and systems in the Web. > > Secure-HTTP enables incorporation of a variety of cryptographic > standards, including, but not limited to, RSA's PKCS-7, and Internet > Privacy Enhanced Mail (PEM), and supports maximal interoperation > between clients and servers using different cryptographic > algorithms. Cryptosystem and signature system interoperation is > particularly useful between U.S. residents and non-U.S. residents, > where the non-U.S. residents may have to use weaker 40-bit keys in > conjunction with RSA's RC2 (TM) and RC4 (TM) variable keysize > ciphers. EIT intends to publish Secure-HTTP as an Internet standard, > and work with others in the WWW community to create a standard that > will encourage using the Web for a wide variety of commercial > transactions. > > Availability > > EIT will make Secure NCSA Mosaic software available at no charge to > CommerceNet members in September and NCSA will incorporate these > secure features in future NCSA Mosaic releases. > How likely is it that these specs will be publicly available so that others can build client front ends to this application? Thanks

1 0

PGP 2.5 working on UNIX
by Carl Ellison 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Note -- I built it for my UNIX machine but I needed to edit the rsaref2 makefile in 3 places to specify gcc. cc barfed on the make. The instructions say to make your own directory, but you need to edit the makefile and run make in place in the rsaref2/install/unix directory or the pgp makefile won't find it. You should make rsaref2 first. - Carl P.S. I'll sign my new 1024 bit key with my old 1264 bit key later. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.5 iQCVAgUBLc7EflQXJENzYr45AQEiqAP/Wg4jq/u8636hMd/zmKS8opL683rKnL0a Jv+WVNIqOASyA9UYoAXegmmXDIohW1PjzudQ3SkZPxfhr9yLrz4h7KUZSowNAdlq XaVBJETumF60YYKPzjDLSj2j3z9yqC8HR4Vv5HtbEv/nEIM8RsFW03rIn4HcUiiO fCCA5K70ouc= =6i8v -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.5 mQCNAi3OxA8AAAEEALNdAXftavTBG2zHV7BEV59gntNlxtJYqfWIi2kTcFIgIPSj KlHleyi9s5dDcQbVNMzjRjF+z8TrICEn9Msy0vXB00WYRtw/7aH2WAZx+x8erOWR +yn1CTRLS/68IWB6Wc1x8hiPycMbiICAbSYjHC/ghq2mwCZO7VQXJENzYr45AAUR tC5DYXJsIEVsbGlzb24gMTAyNC1iaXQga2V5IDxjbWVAc3cuc3RyYXR1cy5jb20+ =tEQq -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

1 0

Voice encryption info request
by David T. Witkowski 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I'm looking for technical info on analog voice encryption techniques, including app notes and schematics if available. Any help would be appreciated, direct email replies are preferred. ...dtw /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ | I'll do whatever my Rice Krispies tell me to do... | | | | ******* Notice of impending email address change: ******* | | New interim address: dwitkow(a)eis.calstate.edu | /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\ -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.3 mQCNAqeeBhcAAAEEAM8M83T/IpKEFbho61dHQIiXx3gFcmBNqMGKtAFFprt9obHH GQ0N1sm/T9DNnS59IxYkB1e08rEMHlearsiw48/p/A43jsYiwYVvy2IBPw6Lnwwc Cdtgbkou/PPiDq/M5nzC9EziljDAE8QhJISKgmez89d4HlLsNqhwMY4XVqGjAAUR tDJEYXZpZCBULiBXaXRrb3dza2kgPGR3aXRrb3dzQG5lcm1hbC5zYW50YXJvc2Eu ZWR1Pg== =PqVE -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

1 0

Re: ping
by Robert A. Hayden 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Mon, 9 May 1994, Jim Miller wrote: > This is an obnoxious, bandwidth-wasting test message. Please > flame..er..ignore. ok ) ( ( ( ( ) () @@ ) (( ( ( ( )( @@ ( )) ) ( ( ( ( ()( /---\ (()( ( _______ ) ) )(@ !O O! )@@ ( ) ) ) < ____) ) ( ( )( ()@ \ o / (@@@@@ ( ()( ) /--| |( o| ( ) ) ((@@(@@ !o! @@@@(@@@@@)() ( | > \___| ) ( @)@@)@ /---\-/---\ )@@@@@()( ) | /---------+ (@@@@)@@@( // /-----\ \\ @@@)@@@@@( . | | \ =========______/|@@@@@@@@@@@@@(@@@ // @ /---\ @ \\ @(@@@(@@@ . . | \ \\=========------\|@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ O @@@ /-\ @@@ O @@(@@)@@ @ . | \ \----+--\-))) @@@@@@@@@@ !! @@@@ % @@@@ !! @@)@@@ .. . | |\______|_)))/ . @@@@@@ !! @@ /---\ @@ !! @@(@@@ @ . . \__========== * . @@ /MM /\O O/\ MM\ @@@@@@@. . | |-\ \ ( . @ !!! !! \-/ !! !!! @@@@@ . | | \ \ ) . . @@@@ !! !! .(. @. .. . | | \ \ ( / .( . \)). ( |O )( O! @@@@ . ) . | | / / ) ( )). (( .) !! ((( !! @@ (. ((. . . | | / / () )) )) .( ( ( ) ). ( !! )( !! ) (( )) .. | |_< / ( ) ( ( ) ) (( ) )).) ((/ | ( | \( )) ((. ). ____<_____\\__\__(___)_))_((_(____))__(_(___.oooO_____Oooo.(_(_)_)((_ ____ Robert A. Hayden <=> hayden(a)krypton.mankato.msus.edu \ /__ -=-=-=-=- <=> -=-=-=-=- \/ / Finger for Geek Code Info <=> Political Correctness is \/ Finger for PGP 2.3a Public Key <=> P.C. for "Thought Police" -=-=-=-=-=-=-=- (GEEK CODE 1.0.1) GAT d- -p+(---) c++(++++) l++ u++ e+/* m++(*)@ s-/++ n-(---) h+(*) f+ g+ w++ t++ r++ y+(*)

1 0

jarthur remailer down
by Eli Brandt 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The remailer is down for an indefinite and possibly infinite period of time, due to abuse. Gory details to follow. In the mean time, don't use it. Eli ebrandt(a)hmc.edu finger for PGP key.

1 0

Nalbandian's email address
by wcs＠anchor.ho.att.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Jim Nalbandian, who's recently been posting to cypherpunks, has a signature line that contains a couple of *severely* non-portable addresses; I have no way to tell whether my email to him worked on the netcomish address. Don't know about his spelling errors, but his addressing errors distinctly *are* international.... I got an interesting bouncegram from Namibia when I tried using the N7SZS(a)K7BUC.AZ.US.NA address - it's some sort of Amateur packet radio address, which has a syntax similar to Internet addresses but rips off the .na namespace (I thought I hadn't seen it before, but I don't keep up with the .US domain, so I tried it, along with K7BUC(a)AZ.US skipping the .na). I've attacked the bouncegram below. Could one of the administrators at Netcom please help him put a useable return address in his .signature? Thanks; Bill Stewart wcs(a)anchor.att.com bill.stewart(a)pleasantonca.ncr.com > -- > * Spelling errors are intentional and international * > Jim Nalbandian netcomsv!lassie!jim%lassie(a)netcom.com > Tempe, Arizona, USA N7SZS(a)K7BUC.AZ.US.NA > No free man shall ever be de-barred the use of arms. The strongest > reason for the people to retain there right to keep and bear arms > is as a last resort to protect themselves against tyranny in > government. <-------- Thomas Jefferson -- >

1 0