- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Congratulations! We found your site!
by PR.Dept.at.SUBMITKING＠keepmailing.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Greetings from SUBMITKING, the leader in automated URL submissions! We found your website using our high-technology, specially designed, "web crawling" software. Unfortunately, most people don't have access to this type of technology. But we can help! As you're aware, most people find websites using any number of popular (and sometimes not so popular) search engines and other marketing resources (like "Site of the Day" (Week, Month, etc.)). But who has the hours and hours to spend searching the Web to find these resources and THEN submit the information to each one? We did it for you! SUBMITKING has taken thousands of man hours to research the top resources people use to find what they need on the Internet. With even more hours we have written special software for each individual resource so that with the information from one form you fill out we can register YOUR site with each of these resources as well as you could do it yourself...if you had 20 or so hours on your hands. Sure, we charge for this service. It's $19.95 for submission to all 200 resources. Which works out to less than a dime each. If you COULD do each site in just 5 minutes (paying yourself .10 each) you'd do 12 an hour (thus earning a whopping $1.20 per hour). Probably 50 or 100 visitors to your site is all it would take to see a huge return on your investment. It's a logical thing to do when you consider all the benefits you stand to gain from being listed in 200 places. That being said we can say no more. We simply invite you to visit the site at http://www.submitking.com and Thank-you for your time. Kind regards, SUBMITKING

1 0

If only...
by lucifer＠dhp.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Bill Stewart wrote: > At 07:10 PM 6/13/97 -0700, Tim May wrote: > >>You mean they can license handguns, but not reporters??? > > >Indeed, it is strange. What part of "Congress shall make no law" > >do they not understand? > > the part between "Congress shall make no law" and "shall not be infringed"... If only they had written "Congress shall make no law." and left it at that... TM

1 0

Re: Declan as a Budding Washington Insider
by lucifer＠dhp.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Paul Bradley wrote: > > I must side with Declan here, true, sometimes Declans articles show a > subtle hint of insiderism <tm>, but I believe that is an inevitable > consequence of working around people in D.C. who don`t want to be > directly associated with certain statements, to quote them against their > will would be journalistic suicide and would soon see Declan with no > contacts whatsoever. The editor of the main newspeak print media for the area I live in told me that their reporters are instructed to write their articles so as to be readable to someone with an eighth grade education. I certainly do not envy Declan for being in the position of having to make his articles readable for the people who are still trying to find the "Any" key while trying not to leave the cypherpunks with the impression he's a fucking retard. *** Next Week *** Declan reveals who is buried in "Grant's Tomb." TruthMonger

1 0

Re: Anonymous proxies & ITAR question (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, Forwarded message: > From: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii(a)amaranth.com> > Date: Mon, 16 Jun 97 17:48:52 -0500 > Subject: Re: Anonymous proxies & ITAR question > >>The renter of a car or truck is not responsible for the contents. The > >>driver of a truck is > > ^^^^^^ The renter is not responsible until they take contractual possession of the truck. From that point until placed on the companies property and the key is placed in the lock-box hanging on the fence (or whatever system they use where you live) it is the responsibility of the renter/driver/physical possessor of the truck for its behaviour or contents. > If I went and rented a truck and there was a "roach" in the ashtray I > should not be held accountable for possesion unless it could be proved > that it was mine and not from someone else that had used the truck or even > a worker at the retal shop. > > Ofcource if I had the trailer loaded with 100K of coke it would be a > little hard to say that someone else left it there. :) Why should coke be treated any different than pot? How much pot should I be able to put in such a truck and 'get away' with as a function of SOP? How much coke? No, ambiguity like this has no place in law. The litmus test should be whether a person or their property were damaged without their prior permission. Crimes should be a function of physical interaction and not some qualitative or even quantitative test. If it is a crime to do 100 of them then it should be a crime to do 1/10 (assuming it should be a crime in the first place). I can see it now, "Sorry sir, we had to let him go. He only 1/4 raped her." Blah. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http:// www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

2 1

RE: Digiweb.com's Movie Boys
by dlv＠bwalk.dm.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Brad Shantz <BradS(a)TRIsource.com> writes: > I already sent them the statutes against junk faxes (currently the only > real spam-killer we have available), and reported them to a number of > different agencies including the CAUCE. Check out www.cauce.org for > more information. This thread had nothing to do with crypto and has taken more time and effort to delete than the original troll. --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

1 0

signup
by Karl Deardorff 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

signup

1 0

Re: [DES] Anguilla surpasses US military in code breaking challe
by Peter Trei 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> From: Vincent Cate <vince(a)offshore.com.ai> > To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com > Subject: Anguilla surpasses US military in code breaking challenge. Vince writes: > Press Release > Anguilla, June 16, 1997 > > Anguilla surpasses US military in code breaking challenge. > > The Caribbean country of Anguilla has searched through more than > 2,380,000,000,000 code keys as part of the Deschall effort to break a DES > encrypted message. This is in response to a challenge by RSA Inc to show > that DES 56 bit keys are not large enough given the rapid advances in > computing technology. As of June 16th, the entire US military effort, > represented by Internet machine names ending in ".mil" in the Deschall > statistics pages, has searched fewer keys. Anguilla host names end in > ".com.ai". Anguilla is a free and democratic country, that does not limit > key lengths. NOT a press release, but true. Framingham,MA , June 16, 1997 Process Software surpasses Anguilla in code breaking challenge. The small software firm of Process Software has searched through more than 25,600,000,000,000 code keys as part of an independent effort to break a DES encrypted message. This is in response to a challenge by RSA Inc to show that DES 56 bit keys are not large enough given the rapid advances in computing technology. As of June 16th, the entire US military effort, represented by Internet machine names ending in ".mil" in the Deschall statistics pages, has searched fewer keys. Anguilla host names end in ".com.ai". This represents 5965 2^32 key segments, or 0.035% of the total keyspace. We've got a long way to go. It's worth noting that the DESChall people claim to have now searched over 23% of the keyspace, and at the current rate will have searched the whole thing about 3 months from now. They have not released their source code for independent evaluation. I for one would feel a lot more comfortable with DESChall if there was at least some outside review, even if no general release is made. Peter Trei trei(a)process.com

4 3

Re: eDrugs / Re: e$: Skins vs. Shirts
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Drug Monger wrote: >> Wow. I actually understood all that... >> The scent of the cogs is unmistakable hereabouts. > > Hetting and Young both pass on a variety of highly informative and >exceedingly normal, reality-based material for the most part. Then, >out of the blue, they post Taoist-Kerouac, acid-flashback missives >which indicate that the Orphan Zombies roaming the computer Nether- >world have not yet managed to steal their souls. > Since John and Bob's psyche-meanderings often seem to occur within >the same time-frame I have concluded that they both have the same >drug connection. > > So...did you bring enough for everybody? That's the nice thing about data-based drugs - just tear open this hypercard and look at the nice binary patterns, and you can make lots of copies for your friends. Do _you_ have the hacker nature? <IMG HREF="http://www.blacknet.net/snowcrash.gif"> Do you _still_ have the hacker nature? Raven

2 1

RE: Digiweb.com's Movie Boys
by Paul Bradley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

CC list cut from huge chain of people to just cpunx. > Explain to me how distributing JPEGS's of nude boys is an exercise of > personal freedom. I would have thought this was obvious, clearly not. Distributing any information is exercising ones right to free speech. Just because the speech happens to offend you does not make it wrong, I also find that often it is the most censorous that are the most repressed, I`m sure the poster probably has a collection of child pornography, or maybe just sits on the beach watching small boys? Datacomms Technologies data security Paul Bradley, Paul(a)fatmans.demon.co.uk Paul(a)crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul(a)cryptography.uk.eu.org Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/ Email for PGP public key, ID: FC76DA85 "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"

1 0

Adult Advertisement - Check It Out!
by Paula 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The following is a message of adult nature. Please do not read further if you are offended by such. You must be atleast 21 to access the following web page! Live Interactive Sex Shows on your PC - No Software to buy or Download!! You have heard about it on T.V., read about in the newspapers, now see it for yourself!! Point your web browser to http://204.137.220.42 for more HOT information! We have Female Shows, Male Shows and Sex Shows straight from Amsterdam! All Shows are Live and Fully Interactive!! Remember to go to http://204.137.220.42 and bookmark the page!! NOTE: Due to Server upgrading, website may not be available at all times. Please try to reconnect at a later time if you have difficulties. Try our traditional LIVE 1-ON-1 phone sex services too! - FREE of charges (Long Distance rates apply) 011-592-583-453 to talk to HOT WOMEN or 011-592-583-426 to talk to HOT MEN!

1 0