- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

None
by Tib 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

> Hope I'm not being totally naive about the capability of computer hardware, but > I sure don't recall my PC (or any that I have ever had or can think of > seeing) having short range broadcasting capabilities. How would this be > theorheticly possible (despite the utter nonsense that the rumor must be) to > accomplish, if at all? Read the whole paper. Look in the archives (or on Google) for TEMPEST. Duh... Mark

1 0

None
by Tib 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

> Hope I'm not being totally naive about the capability of computer hardware, but > I sure don't recall my PC (or any that I have ever had or can think of > seeing) having short range broadcasting capabilities. How would this be > theorheticly possible (despite the utter nonsense that the rumor must be) to > accomplish, if at all? Read the whole paper. Look in the archives (or on Google) for TEMPEST. Duh... Mark

1 0

None
by Tib 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

> Hope I'm not being totally naive about the capability of computer hardware, but > I sure don't recall my PC (or any that I have ever had or can think of > seeing) having short range broadcasting capabilities. How would this be > theorheticly possible (despite the utter nonsense that the rumor must be) to > accomplish, if at all? Read the whole paper. Look in the archives (or on Google) for TEMPEST. Duh... Mark

1 0

None
by Tib 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

> Hope I'm not being totally naive about the capability of computer hardware, but > I sure don't recall my PC (or any that I have ever had or can think of > seeing) having short range broadcasting capabilities. How would this be > theorheticly possible (despite the utter nonsense that the rumor must be) to > accomplish, if at all? Read the whole paper. Look in the archives (or on Google) for TEMPEST. Duh... Mark

1 0

None
by Tib 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

> Hope I'm not being totally naive about the capability of computer hardware, but > I sure don't recall my PC (or any that I have ever had or can think of > seeing) having short range broadcasting capabilities. How would this be > theorheticly possible (despite the utter nonsense that the rumor must be) to > accomplish, if at all? Read the whole paper. Look in the archives (or on Google) for TEMPEST. Duh... Mark

1 0

None
by Tib 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

> Hope I'm not being totally naive about the capability of computer hardware, but > I sure don't recall my PC (or any that I have ever had or can think of > seeing) having short range broadcasting capabilities. How would this be > theorheticly possible (despite the utter nonsense that the rumor must be) to > accomplish, if at all? Read the whole paper. Look in the archives (or on Google) for TEMPEST. Duh... Mark

1 0

None
by Tib 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

> Hope I'm not being totally naive about the capability of computer hardware, but > I sure don't recall my PC (or any that I have ever had or can think of > seeing) having short range broadcasting capabilities. How would this be > theorheticly possible (despite the utter nonsense that the rumor must be) to > accomplish, if at all? Read the whole paper. Look in the archives (or on Google) for TEMPEST. Duh... Mark

1 0

None
by Tib 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

> Hope I'm not being totally naive about the capability of computer hardware, but > I sure don't recall my PC (or any that I have ever had or can think of > seeing) having short range broadcasting capabilities. How would this be > theorheticly possible (despite the utter nonsense that the rumor must be) to > accomplish, if at all? Read the whole paper. Look in the archives (or on Google) for TEMPEST. Duh... Mark

1 0

Bush's DHS program continues under Obama
by Scott Bennett 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

After the demise of the constitutional republic, the North American Surveillance State continues to grow ever nastier, complete with an unconscionable slur on the good name of Albert Einstein. See the article at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/02/AR200907020… The need for tools like tor and PGP/GPG ought to become more and more apparent to Americans as time goes on. Meet the new boss: same as the old boss. Joe Stalin, eat your heart out. Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG ********************************************************************** * Internet: bennett at cs.niu.edu * *--------------------------------------------------------------------* * "A well regulated and disciplined militia, is at all times a good * * objection to the introduction of that bane of all free governments * * -- a standing army." * * -- Gov. John Hancock, New York Journal, 28 January 1790 * ********************************************************************** ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

(Disturbing) Security Issue Kills Domestic Spying Probe
by EEkid＠aol.com 05 Jul '18

05 Jul '18

Security Issue Kills Domestic Spying Probe By DEVLIN BARRETT, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 22 minutes ago WASHINGTON - The government has abruptly ended an inquiry into the warrantless eavesdropping program because the National Security Agency refused to grant Justice Department lawyers the necessary security clearance to probe the matter. The Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility, or OPR, sent a fax to Rep. Maurice Hinchey (news, bio, voting record), D- N.Y., on Wednesday saying they were closing their inquiry because without clearance their lawyers cannot examine Justice lawyers' role in the program. "We have been unable to make any meaningful progress in our investigation because OPR has been denied security clearances for access to information about the NSA program," OPR counsel H. Marshall Jarrett wrote to Hinchey. Hinchey's office shared the letter with The Associated Press. Jarrett wrote that beginning in January, his office has made a series of requests for the necessary clearances. Those requests were denied Tuesday. "Without these clearances, we cannot investigate this matter and therefore have closed our investigation," wrote Jarrett. Justice Department spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the terrorist surveillance program "has been subject to extensive oversight both in the executive branch and in Congress from the time of its inception." Roehrkasse noted the OPR's mission is not to investigate possible wrongdoing in other agencies, but to determine if Justice Department lawyers violated any ethical rules. He declined to comment when asked if the end of the inquiry meant the agency believed its lawyers had handled the wiretapping matter ethically. Hinchey is one of many House Democrats who have been highly critical of the domestic eavesdropping program first revealed in December. He said lawmakers would push to find out who at the NSA denied the Justice Department lawyers security clearance. "This administration thinks they can just violate any law they want, and they've created a culture of fear to try to get away with that. It's up to us to stand up to them," said Hinchey. In February, the OPR announced it would examine the conduct of its own agency's lawyers in the program, though they were not authorized to investigate NSA activities. Bush's decision to authorize the largest U.S. spy agency to monitor people inside the United States, without warrants, generated a host of questions about the program's legal justification. The administration has vehemently defended the eavesdropping, saying the NSA's activities were narrowly targeted to intercept international calls and e-mails of Americans and others inside the U.S. with suspected ties to the al-Qaida terror network. Separately, the Justice Department sought last month to dismiss a federal lawsuit accusing the telephone company AT&T of colluding with the Bush administration's warrantless wiretapping program. The lawsuit, brought by an Internet privacy group, does not name the government as a defendant, but the Department of Justice has sought to quash the lawsuit, saying it threatens to expose government and military secrets. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060510/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/domestic_spying ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as eugen(a)leitl.org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

1 0