- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: What's a "fingerprint" ?
by paul＠fatmans.demon.co.uk 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Speaking about PGP.. Guys... > Whats fingerprint is need for ? And how to create it ? A key fingerprint is a unique identifier for an individual PGP key, it is used for verifying that a recieved key is authentic before signing it, to generate a PGP key fingerprint use pgp -kvc <username> Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security Paul Bradley, Paul(a)fatmans.demon.co.uk Paul(a)crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul(a)cryptography.uk.eu.org Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/ Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1 "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"

1 0

Re: Intellectual dishonesty
by paul＠fatmans.demon.co.uk 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Paul tries to suppress the discussion of crypto on this list. Before I gave up > on this list completely, I used to think that it's a veru evil thing to do. I very much doubt you have anyone whatsoever to agree with you on this. I very rarely post anything that is not crypto-relevant to this list, apart from my occasional indulgance in flaming people. > Even if there are problems with Don Wood's IPG cryptoscheme (something I don't > know to be true until I find the time to look at it myself), it's outright > evil to harrass Don the way Paul did. It's clear that Don knows more about the > field of cryptography than most people remaining on this mailing list. Don has a record of creating noise and flames on this list because he incites them, when someone refuses for example, to admit that a software generated random number stream is not a one time pad there is very little one can do to maintain a sensible discussion on the matter. Once Don conceded his system was not a one time pad I stopped protesting. As for Dons knowledge about cryptography I seem to remember him once promising to sell his company for $1 if his previous cryptosystem was broken which it summarily was. True, my flames of Don have maybe been a little more vitriolic than strictly necessary but he did ask for it.. > to on this list. Would you submit the authors of the knapsack scheme to the > same kind of abuse because it was broken? In fact, how many people are there > still on this list who know what the knapsack scheme is? No, because they would not for example initially claim the scheme was a one time pad then rant endlessly about QED and proofs of security based on statistical analysis of output data. And as to your last question I for one do know what the knapsack scheme is, its a pity there were weaknesses as it was an elegant cryptosystem. > The work of this list appears to be character assassination. If people like > Paul Bradley and Tim May insist on slandering people and trying to harm their > professional reputations (see the thread on "don't hire" lists), I will do my > best to defend them and their freedom of speech, and to expose the likes of > Paul Bradley - an ignorant buffoon out to silence anyone who knows more about > the field than he does. I am neither ignorant nor out to silence people. My knowledge of cryptography as compared to yours is not the issue, I post information and answers to questions that are of worth to the other members of the list, your knowledge of cryptography may be better or worse than my own, however, you have posted nothing crypto-relevant so we must assume you know very little. Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security Paul Bradley, Paul(a)fatmans.demon.co.uk Paul(a)crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul(a)cryptography.uk.eu.org Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/ Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1 "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"

1 0

Mondex
by Black Unicorn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Can anyone briefly discuss the anonymity features (or lack thereof) for Mondex? -- Forward complaints to : European Association of Envelope Manufactures Finger for Public Key Gutenbergstrasse 21;Postfach;CH-3001;Bern Vote Monarchist Switzerland

3 2

Re: What's a "fingerprint" ?
by paul＠fatmans.demon.co.uk 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Speaking about PGP.. Guys... > Whats fingerprint is need for ? And how to create it ? A key fingerprint is a unique identifier for an individual PGP key, it is used for verifying that a recieved key is authentic before signing it, to generate a PGP key fingerprint use pgp -kvc <username> Datacomms Technologies web authoring and data security Paul Bradley, Paul(a)fatmans.demon.co.uk Paul(a)crypto.uk.eu.org, Paul(a)cryptography.uk.eu.org Http://www.cryptography.home.ml.org/ Email for PGP public key, ID: 5BBFAEB1 "Don`t forget to mount a scratch monkey"

1 0

UNR_avl
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

12-06-96, NYT: Compromise on Encryption Exports Seems to Unravel "We really feel that there has been a bait and switch situation and I'm not going to be silent about it," said Roel Pieper, chief executive and vice chairman of Tandem Computers. A Nov. 15 executive order that transferred export oversight to Commerce contained several new wrinkles that even previous industry supporters consider potential deal breakers. For one thing, the Justice Department would play a consulting role to the Commerce Department, which industry executives see as giving law-enforcement officials too big a role in the export process. And they contend that the order prescribes a system that might enable law-enforcement officials to unscramble messages while they are being transmitted, rather than after the fact, as the IBM compromise had seemed to specify. ----- http://www.nytimes.com/library/cyber/week/1206encrypt.html UNR_avl

1 0

Apology
by jc105558＠spruce.hsu.edu 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

- James - wrote: >I am writing this ... >Tim May, do >you have anything on subjest to discuss? I apologies publicly for this comment. I'm sorry Tim. My bad. - James -

2 1

stop annoying me
by Perry E. Metzger 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Someone is sending me lots of requests, with forged from addresses, asking that the cryptography mailing list sign up "cypherpunks(a)toad.com" for the cryptography mailing list. I'm obviously not going to do it. The only result repeated requests will have is that I'll put in a regexp to filter all the mail with these stupid requests. In other words, stop. There is no point. Perry

1 0

Aghast..
by TQDB 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I couldn't believe my eyes when reading through Inter@ctive Week's "The Driving Forces of Cyberspace" Top 25 list I saw that Louis J. Freeh, Director of the FBI received an Honorable Mention because of him supposedly believing that "Encryption is an inalienable right." I suppose that isn't necessarily a lie, but it would need the word "Weak" added on to the front in order to qualify it. Anyway, I was quite disappointed in seeing their poor choice of this candidate. .TQDB -=| T.Q.D.B. - tqdb(a)wichita.fn.net - http://www.feist.com/~tqdb |=- "The term 'hacker' is not necessarily derogatory. A small percentage of them give the rest a bad name." --Special Agent Andrew Black, FBI SF Computer Crime Squad

1 0

re: Gilmore / Logos
by nobody＠cypherpunks.ca 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Heh. Think again. Logos is obviously someone who has a lot of time on his/her hands. Consider the volume of Gilmore over the last several months compared to the volume of Logos over the last several days. Gilmore has quite a bit more on his mind than how people behave on CP. Logos' identity is clearly not Gilmore. I doubt Gilmore even reads CP anymore. So who _is_ Logos. We know that Logos: 1)Tim May suspects who Logos is 2)Is a prolific poster 3)Intends to combat DLV/DT and other Detweilers The oddest tidbit yet is Tim May's posting to the *list* "P.S. I certainly hope this "Logos" nym is not who I suspect it is, as this will surely end our Real World friendship. A fucking bozo." This post clearly is an act of misdirection. If May had a personal bone to pick with someone he actually knows than what purpose does it serve to announce this to the list? Nothing less than to preempt the obvious assertation that Logos is Tim May. W.W. Brierson

1 0

Re: The Science Generations
by frantz＠netcom.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 1:12 AM 12/6/96 -0800, Dale Thorn wrote: >I would guess that those who became and remained successful technically >(as opposed to becoming "business people") were using HP computers and >such in the 1970s. I for one was a heavy user then, and PETs, Apples, >Radio Shack, etc. computers weren't reliable enough for serious work. I guess those people using VisiCalc on the Apple ][ weren't doing serious work :-). (Also the many small businesses using these early machines for AR, Accounting etc.) Me, I was doing OS programming on IBM 370s. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Bill Frantz | The lottery is a tax on | Periwinkle -- Consulting (408)356-8506 | those who can't do math. | 16345 Englewood Ave. frantz(a)netcom.com | - Who 1st said this? | Los Gatos, CA 95032, USA

2 1