- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

An "A" to "Z" G U N R E F R E S H E R C O U R S E
by None 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

An "A" to "Z" G U N R E F R E S H E R C O U R S E a. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject. b. A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone. c. Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface. d. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control. e. If guns are outlawed, can we use swords? f. If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words. g. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms. h. If you don't know your rights, you don't have any. i. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. j. The United States Constitution (c)1791. All Rights Reserved. k. What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand. l. The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore the others. m. 64,999,987 firearm owners killed no one yesterday. n. Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Politicians. o. Know guns, Know peace and safety. No guns, no peace nor safety. p. You don't shoot to kill; You shoot to stay alive. q. 911 - government sponsored Dial a Prayer. r. Assault is a behavior, not a device. s. Criminals love gun control - it makes their jobs safer. t. If Guns cause Crime, then Matches cause Arson. u. Only a government that is afraid of it's citizens tries to control them. v. You have only the rights you are willing to fight for. w. Enforce the "gun control laws" in place, don't make more. x. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves. y. The American Revolution would never have happened with Gun Control. z. "....a government by the people, for the people....." PLEASE PASS THIS 'REFRESHER' TO -10- FREE CITIZENS.

1 0

An "A" to "Z" G U N R E F R E S H E R C O U R S E
by None 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

An "A" to "Z" G U N R E F R E S H E R C O U R S E a. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject. b. A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone. c. Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface. d. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control. e. If guns are outlawed, can we use swords? f. If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words. g. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms. h. If you don't know your rights, you don't have any. i. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. j. The United States Constitution (c)1791. All Rights Reserved. k. What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand. l. The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore the others. m. 64,999,987 firearm owners killed no one yesterday. n. Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Politicians. o. Know guns, Know peace and safety. No guns, no peace nor safety. p. You don't shoot to kill; You shoot to stay alive. q. 911 - government sponsored Dial a Prayer. r. Assault is a behavior, not a device. s. Criminals love gun control - it makes their jobs safer. t. If Guns cause Crime, then Matches cause Arson. u. Only a government that is afraid of it's citizens tries to control them. v. You have only the rights you are willing to fight for. w. Enforce the "gun control laws" in place, don't make more. x. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves. y. The American Revolution would never have happened with Gun Control. z. "....a government by the people, for the people....." PLEASE PASS THIS 'REFRESHER' TO -10- FREE CITIZENS.

1 0

An "A" to "Z" G U N R E F R E S H E R C O U R S E
by None 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

An "A" to "Z" G U N R E F R E S H E R C O U R S E a. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject. b. A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone. c. Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface. d. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control. e. If guns are outlawed, can we use swords? f. If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words. g. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms. h. If you don't know your rights, you don't have any. i. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. j. The United States Constitution (c)1791. All Rights Reserved. k. What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand. l. The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore the others. m. 64,999,987 firearm owners killed no one yesterday. n. Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Politicians. o. Know guns, Know peace and safety. No guns, no peace nor safety. p. You don't shoot to kill; You shoot to stay alive. q. 911 - government sponsored Dial a Prayer. r. Assault is a behavior, not a device. s. Criminals love gun control - it makes their jobs safer. t. If Guns cause Crime, then Matches cause Arson. u. Only a government that is afraid of it's citizens tries to control them. v. You have only the rights you are willing to fight for. w. Enforce the "gun control laws" in place, don't make more. x. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves. y. The American Revolution would never have happened with Gun Control. z. "....a government by the people, for the people....." PLEASE PASS THIS 'REFRESHER' TO -10- FREE CITIZENS.

1 0

Sounding the alarm on government mandated data retention
by Lauren Weinstein 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Dave, Recently here in IP, I commented on Attorny General Gonazales' comments on data retention, and the alarming slippery slope that I feel this represented: http://lists.elistx.com/archives/interesting-people/200604/msg00134.html Now, Declan has noted in an article: http://news.com.com/Congress+may+consider+mandatory+ISP+snooping/ 2100-1028_3-6066608.html?tag=st_lh that a Democratic Congresswoman is proposing to fast-track a bill or ammendment to *require* essentially permanent retention of users' Internet activity data (until at *least* one year after the user *closes their account*). For long-term users, this means effectively permanent retention. Again, I must note the supreme ironies. It was only a few months ago that people were screaming bloody murder about DoJ demanding Search Engine records -- a demand that apparently only Google had the backbone to appropriately resist, noting the sensitivity of the data involved. This controversy triggered calls (including in some legislative quarters) for a law mandating the destruction of much related data after some reasonable, relatively short interval, with appropriate designated exceptions for R&D, business development, and the like. Now, by waving the red flag of fighting child pornography, seemingly intelligent and usually well-meaning legislators appear ready to create the mother of all big-brother database laws, a treasure trove of personal data that will ultimately be available for every fishing expedition under the sun. For those persons who trust the government not to abuse such data, I hasten to note that these kinds of infrastructures, once in place, tend to be self-perpetuating, and will be available to *future* governments as well, including administrations who might not be as "benign" as the current one. Declan's article correctly notes the comparison with the McMartin Preschool child abuse witch-hunts of years ago. Hysteria over the abhorrent and real problem of child porn is being used to potentially decimate broad and critical privacy rights -- with the high probability of negative effects and consequences that are almost impossible to overstate. If we do not maintain a balance between law enforcement goals (including but not limited to child abuse issues), and privacy rights, we will be flushing those rights we've had as law-abiding citizens down the toilet -- all in the name of seemingly laudable goals. The Internet is rapidly becoming involved in most technology-based human communications. The sensitivity of Internet user activity data can be enormous. Broadly mandated data retention would move us drastically toward the realm of previously unimaginable "nightmare" scenarios (such as requiring the recording of all telephone calls, or the installation of government cameras in bedrooms -- both actions that could indeed be useful for law enforcement purposes). Without wishing to sound melodramatic, I strongly assert that if we don't take a stand now, we are likely to see the wonders of the Net repurposed into shackles that have the potential to undermine the very basis of our fundamental freedoms. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren(a)vortex.com or lauren(a)pfir.org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, IOIC - International Open Internet Coalition - http://www.ioic.net Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com DayThink: http://daythink.vortex.com ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as eugen(a)leitl.org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

1 0

[IP] Sounding the alarm on government mandated data retention
by David Farber 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Begin forwarded message:

1 0

<nettime> Amazon and Wikileaks
by t byfield 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

When Amazon booted Wikileaks, I decided to do tinker with this problem. Too many arguments about Wikileaks (and just about everything else) hinged too heavily on metaphors and analogies, which tend to obscure rather than articulate what's new about a situation -- kind of obvious, if you think about it. After all, Amazon began as a bookseller and remains an immense force in that field, which historically is deeply intertwingled with "free speech." So, regardless of your preferred metaphor for Wikileaks (journalism, publishing, treason, terrorism, etc), Amazon's action conflicted with that tradition. A typical conglomerate problem, right? A diversified 'portfolio' may be a smart strategy for making money, but it's a shit strategy when it comes to the particulars of any given activity -- boring stuff like craft, values, tradition. Naturally, Amazon runs a print-on-demand service, Createspace. So I knocked together a book called _Cablegate: The Complete Wikileaks Datadump_, Volume 1. Their "online tools" are what they are, and it went well enough -- and quickly enough that I received five proof copies notably ahead of schedule. I approved them and ordered ten copies, which also arrived ahead of schedule. The book consists of 200 pages of what might look like random noise to some people, or maybe like a 3D barcode to others. The cover text on the back (and therefore on Createspace's and Amazon's promo pages, where it received several reviews) said this: On Sunday 28th November 2010, Wikileaks began publishing 251,287 leaked United States embassy cables, the largest set of confidential documents ever to be released into the public domain. Volume 1 of Cablegate: The Complete Wikileaks Datadump offers an abstract, high-level view of these communications in 200 densely packed pages. Due to the immense volume of material, it was necessary to rely on extremely efficient encoding techniques, with a consequent loss of resolution; as a result, we cannot guarantee that all of the material is legible. Soon after I got the production copies, the URL for this book circulated on the "anonops" IRC channel. And very soon after that -- more than hours, less than days -- Createspace "reached out" (bleh) to say Our technical services department has recently confirmed that the interior content uploaded to your title contains blank black and white pages. They have set your title to incomplete so that you can upload a file with content. I went back and forth with them about this, of course. Their explanations are painfully boring, but do pay close attention: Version 2: Upon reviewing your account, it was confirmed that the content submitted for your title is entirely comprised of black and white static. This content has caused pauses in our production process as it's viewed as a printing error. As this is halting production we are unable to continue distributing this title at this time. Version 3: In the most recent print run of your title, production was stopped on your book after a routine quality check indicated that your interior files were printing incorrectly due to a production error. We had to remove the availability of your title as we are unable to continue fulfilling orders for your title since it will continue to halt production. Version 4: You are welcome to fade the static images on each page and indicate on each page that you are displaying encrypted text and that it is a gag book. You may also upload a file with text on most pages and the static image pages interspersed throughout. However, please note that we will not allow more than two consecutive pages of static images. Additionally, you may add a disclaimer page at the beginning of the book that this is a gag book. You may also consider adding information in the description that this is a gag book as to not foster customer confusion on Amazon.com. Version 5: There are two main concerns with the interior of Title ID 3522893. First and foremost, the interior file caused a production error; this occurred was a result of the black and white images, also defined as "static," on all the interior pages. Furthermore, as there is not text in the book file indicating the black and white images as intentional, it was seen as a mistake in production. As a result, all of production was stopped and in order to prevent the same occurrence, it was necessary to remove the availability of the title. Secondly, the current book description does not detail that the book is a gag or the reason for the illegible material on the interior. Therefore, customers could purchase the title without being made aware that it is a gag book. Overall, it must be understood from the interior files that the full interior of the black and white images is intentional. To do so, it is necessary to indicate in text that you are displaying encrypted text and to indicate in both the interior and book description that it is a gag book. (I'll leave the claims that it's "encrypted" *and* a "gag" for others to sort out...) Now, I'll be the first to admit that there's something very reasonable about all of this. Their production lines have QA people who see a snow crash and barf on it, which buggers things up, etc, etc. Except for one thing: I don't feel like being 'reasonable.' This is a book, they're a printer-publisher, and they've refused to print it based in large part on the argument -- after much tooth-pulling -- that it might offend someone. They can couch their argument in terms of production efficiencies and consumer confusion (standard weapons in commercial interests' war on culture), much as theocrats have suppressed books on grounds of heresy, and as bluenoses have suppressed books on grounds of obscenity, but the structural issue remains the same: one party wants to print a book, other parties might not want it printed, and the printer-publisher is the man in the middle. Though I doubt very much that if I'd printed a _History of Televised Static_, with details about where, when, and how each image was captured and a scholarly introduction afterword, they would have empowered their QA people to reject it. But no matter: Volumes 2, 3, 4, etc are forthcoming, and I'll factor in Createspace's issues into the encoding and design. This fight's been going on for centuries now, and leaks aren't going away. I'm in no rush. And, anyway, once I'd kicked the Amazon dinosaur its various extremities started waking up. Amazon very graciously invited me to publish a Kindle edition -- which of course would have the benefit that it doesn't need to be printed and therefore doesn't face quite the same production issues. So I used their online tools (same story) and was pleased to see this message: Converting book file to Kindle format... \ | / -- -- / | \ This may take a few moments. If you have completed all required fields above, click "Save and Continue" to move forward while conversion continues. I just logged in again to see their little wheel-of-industry widget still spinning. It's been "converting" since Christmas eve. URLs: bit.ly/bookoleaks > createspace.com "This title is currently on hold. This title is still being prepared for sale and should be ready soon." amzn.to/bookileaks > amazon.com "Out of Print--Limited Availability." Cheers, T # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime(a)kein.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

<nettime> Amazon and Wikileaks
by t byfield 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

When Amazon booted Wikileaks, I decided to do tinker with this problem. Too many arguments about Wikileaks (and just about everything else) hinged too heavily on metaphors and analogies, which tend to obscure rather than articulate what's new about a situation -- kind of obvious, if you think about it. After all, Amazon began as a bookseller and remains an immense force in that field, which historically is deeply intertwingled with "free speech." So, regardless of your preferred metaphor for Wikileaks (journalism, publishing, treason, terrorism, etc), Amazon's action conflicted with that tradition. A typical conglomerate problem, right? A diversified 'portfolio' may be a smart strategy for making money, but it's a shit strategy when it comes to the particulars of any given activity -- boring stuff like craft, values, tradition. Naturally, Amazon runs a print-on-demand service, Createspace. So I knocked together a book called _Cablegate: The Complete Wikileaks Datadump_, Volume 1. Their "online tools" are what they are, and it went well enough -- and quickly enough that I received five proof copies notably ahead of schedule. I approved them and ordered ten copies, which also arrived ahead of schedule. The book consists of 200 pages of what might look like random noise to some people, or maybe like a 3D barcode to others. The cover text on the back (and therefore on Createspace's and Amazon's promo pages, where it received several reviews) said this: On Sunday 28th November 2010, Wikileaks began publishing 251,287 leaked United States embassy cables, the largest set of confidential documents ever to be released into the public domain. Volume 1 of Cablegate: The Complete Wikileaks Datadump offers an abstract, high-level view of these communications in 200 densely packed pages. Due to the immense volume of material, it was necessary to rely on extremely efficient encoding techniques, with a consequent loss of resolution; as a result, we cannot guarantee that all of the material is legible. Soon after I got the production copies, the URL for this book circulated on the "anonops" IRC channel. And very soon after that -- more than hours, less than days -- Createspace "reached out" (bleh) to say Our technical services department has recently confirmed that the interior content uploaded to your title contains blank black and white pages. They have set your title to incomplete so that you can upload a file with content. I went back and forth with them about this, of course. Their explanations are painfully boring, but do pay close attention: Version 2: Upon reviewing your account, it was confirmed that the content submitted for your title is entirely comprised of black and white static. This content has caused pauses in our production process as it's viewed as a printing error. As this is halting production we are unable to continue distributing this title at this time. Version 3: In the most recent print run of your title, production was stopped on your book after a routine quality check indicated that your interior files were printing incorrectly due to a production error. We had to remove the availability of your title as we are unable to continue fulfilling orders for your title since it will continue to halt production. Version 4: You are welcome to fade the static images on each page and indicate on each page that you are displaying encrypted text and that it is a gag book. You may also upload a file with text on most pages and the static image pages interspersed throughout. However, please note that we will not allow more than two consecutive pages of static images. Additionally, you may add a disclaimer page at the beginning of the book that this is a gag book. You may also consider adding information in the description that this is a gag book as to not foster customer confusion on Amazon.com. Version 5: There are two main concerns with the interior of Title ID 3522893. First and foremost, the interior file caused a production error; this occurred was a result of the black and white images, also defined as "static," on all the interior pages. Furthermore, as there is not text in the book file indicating the black and white images as intentional, it was seen as a mistake in production. As a result, all of production was stopped and in order to prevent the same occurrence, it was necessary to remove the availability of the title. Secondly, the current book description does not detail that the book is a gag or the reason for the illegible material on the interior. Therefore, customers could purchase the title without being made aware that it is a gag book. Overall, it must be understood from the interior files that the full interior of the black and white images is intentional. To do so, it is necessary to indicate in text that you are displaying encrypted text and to indicate in both the interior and book description that it is a gag book. (I'll leave the claims that it's "encrypted" *and* a "gag" for others to sort out...) Now, I'll be the first to admit that there's something very reasonable about all of this. Their production lines have QA people who see a snow crash and barf on it, which buggers things up, etc, etc. Except for one thing: I don't feel like being 'reasonable.' This is a book, they're a printer-publisher, and they've refused to print it based in large part on the argument -- after much tooth-pulling -- that it might offend someone. They can couch their argument in terms of production efficiencies and consumer confusion (standard weapons in commercial interests' war on culture), much as theocrats have suppressed books on grounds of heresy, and as bluenoses have suppressed books on grounds of obscenity, but the structural issue remains the same: one party wants to print a book, other parties might not want it printed, and the printer-publisher is the man in the middle. Though I doubt very much that if I'd printed a _History of Televised Static_, with details about where, when, and how each image was captured and a scholarly introduction afterword, they would have empowered their QA people to reject it. But no matter: Volumes 2, 3, 4, etc are forthcoming, and I'll factor in Createspace's issues into the encoding and design. This fight's been going on for centuries now, and leaks aren't going away. I'm in no rush. And, anyway, once I'd kicked the Amazon dinosaur its various extremities started waking up. Amazon very graciously invited me to publish a Kindle edition -- which of course would have the benefit that it doesn't need to be printed and therefore doesn't face quite the same production issues. So I used their online tools (same story) and was pleased to see this message: Converting book file to Kindle format... \ | / -- -- / | \ This may take a few moments. If you have completed all required fields above, click "Save and Continue" to move forward while conversion continues. I just logged in again to see their little wheel-of-industry widget still spinning. It's been "converting" since Christmas eve. URLs: bit.ly/bookoleaks > createspace.com "This title is currently on hold. This title is still being prepared for sale and should be ready soon." amzn.to/bookileaks > amazon.com "Out of Print--Limited Availability." Cheers, T # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime(a)kein.org ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

An "A" to "Z" G U N R E F R E S H E R C O U R S E
by None 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

An "A" to "Z" G U N R E F R E S H E R C O U R S E a. An armed man is a citizen. An unarmed man is a subject. b. A gun in the hand is better than a cop on the phone. c. Smith & Wesson: The original point and click interface. d. Gun control is not about guns; it's about control. e. If guns are outlawed, can we use swords? f. If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words. g. Free men do not ask permission to bear arms. h. If you don't know your rights, you don't have any. i. Those who trade liberty for security have neither. j. The United States Constitution (c)1791. All Rights Reserved. k. What part of "shall not be infringed" do you not understand. l. The Second Amendment is in place in case they ignore the others. m. 64,999,987 firearm owners killed no one yesterday. n. Guns only have two enemies: Rust and Politicians. o. Know guns, Know peace and safety. No guns, no peace nor safety. p. You don't shoot to kill; You shoot to stay alive. q. 911 - government sponsored Dial a Prayer. r. Assault is a behavior, not a device. s. Criminals love gun control - it makes their jobs safer. t. If Guns cause Crime, then Matches cause Arson. u. Only a government that is afraid of it's citizens tries to control them. v. You have only the rights you are willing to fight for. w. Enforce the "gun control laws" in place, don't make more. x. When you remove the people's right to bear arms, you create slaves. y. The American Revolution would never have happened with Gun Control. z. "....a government by the people, for the people....." PLEASE PASS THIS 'REFRESHER' TO -10- FREE CITIZENS.

1 0

Sounding the alarm on government mandated data retention
by Lauren Weinstein 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Dave, Recently here in IP, I commented on Attorny General Gonazales' comments on data retention, and the alarming slippery slope that I feel this represented: http://lists.elistx.com/archives/interesting-people/200604/msg00134.html Now, Declan has noted in an article: http://news.com.com/Congress+may+consider+mandatory+ISP+snooping/ 2100-1028_3-6066608.html?tag=st_lh that a Democratic Congresswoman is proposing to fast-track a bill or ammendment to *require* essentially permanent retention of users' Internet activity data (until at *least* one year after the user *closes their account*). For long-term users, this means effectively permanent retention. Again, I must note the supreme ironies. It was only a few months ago that people were screaming bloody murder about DoJ demanding Search Engine records -- a demand that apparently only Google had the backbone to appropriately resist, noting the sensitivity of the data involved. This controversy triggered calls (including in some legislative quarters) for a law mandating the destruction of much related data after some reasonable, relatively short interval, with appropriate designated exceptions for R&D, business development, and the like. Now, by waving the red flag of fighting child pornography, seemingly intelligent and usually well-meaning legislators appear ready to create the mother of all big-brother database laws, a treasure trove of personal data that will ultimately be available for every fishing expedition under the sun. For those persons who trust the government not to abuse such data, I hasten to note that these kinds of infrastructures, once in place, tend to be self-perpetuating, and will be available to *future* governments as well, including administrations who might not be as "benign" as the current one. Declan's article correctly notes the comparison with the McMartin Preschool child abuse witch-hunts of years ago. Hysteria over the abhorrent and real problem of child porn is being used to potentially decimate broad and critical privacy rights -- with the high probability of negative effects and consequences that are almost impossible to overstate. If we do not maintain a balance between law enforcement goals (including but not limited to child abuse issues), and privacy rights, we will be flushing those rights we've had as law-abiding citizens down the toilet -- all in the name of seemingly laudable goals. The Internet is rapidly becoming involved in most technology-based human communications. The sensitivity of Internet user activity data can be enormous. Broadly mandated data retention would move us drastically toward the realm of previously unimaginable "nightmare" scenarios (such as requiring the recording of all telephone calls, or the installation of government cameras in bedrooms -- both actions that could indeed be useful for law enforcement purposes). Without wishing to sound melodramatic, I strongly assert that if we don't take a stand now, we are likely to see the wonders of the Net repurposed into shackles that have the potential to undermine the very basis of our fundamental freedoms. --Lauren-- Lauren Weinstein lauren(a)vortex.com or lauren(a)pfir.org Tel: +1 (818) 225-2800 http://www.pfir.org/lauren Co-Founder, PFIR - People For Internet Responsibility - http://www.pfir.org Co-Founder, IOIC - International Open Internet Coalition - http://www.ioic.net Moderator, PRIVACY Forum - http://www.vortex.com Member, ACM Committee on Computers and Public Policy Lauren's Blog: http://lauren.vortex.com DayThink: http://daythink.vortex.com ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as eugen(a)leitl.org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

1 0

[IP] Sounding the alarm on government mandated data retention
by David Farber 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Begin forwarded message:

1 0