- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: [Politech] John Gilmore on the homeless, RFID tags, and ki ttens
by Freematt357＠aol.com 02 Apr '04

02 Apr '04

In a message dated 4/2/04 11:39:42 AM, ptrei(a)rsasecurity.com writes: >I haven't eaten domestic cat, but I have eaten lion. Just out of curiosity, what kind of lion was it? Because after all we do know that curiosity killed the cat. Regards, Freematt-

1 0

RE: [Politech] John Gilmore on the homeless, RFID tags, and ki ttens
by Major Variola (ret) 02 Apr '04

02 Apr '04

At 11:38 AM 4/2/04 -0500, Trei, Peter wrote: > >I haven't eaten domestic cat, but I have eaten lion. Suprisingly, >it was a light tender meat, resembling veal more than anything >else. Tasted good. Just out of curiosity, how did you verify that it was in fact that species? I mean, if you beat a monkey to death at your table, or buy a live civet, you see it before its served. I recently read about a firm selling "what's that meat" biochem assays on a chip. Useful for everyone from gourmets to kosher to customs. >"So who's top predator now?" You're just a mobile incubator for E. coli :-) ------- "I didn't claw my way to the top of the food chain to eat vegetables."

1 0

Private U.S. Guards Take Big Risks for Right Price
by R. A. Hettinga 02 Apr '04

02 Apr '04

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I see in the following article the kernel of geodesic markets for force. Actually a sort of re-emergence, I suppose, remembering letters of marque, etc., and my idea about the decline in switching costs "unwinding" the development of human-switched hierarchical social networks, with microprocessor-switched geodesic networks creating diseconomies of scale, and cash-settled auction pricing replacing "calculated" transfer pricing. The idea is, if transaction and price discovery costs fall enough, private force companies that auction their services in a free market become better than the "public" ones that rely on confiscated tax revenue. I'd expect that sooner or later companies like Blackwater will start training recruits in competition with the armed forces instead of just hiring vets. Certainly there lots of special ops vets training civilians in combat shooting at places like Frontsite, etc, for self-defense, and local militarized police for forced-entry, etc, as part of the same cold-war spin-off process that created companies like Blackwater in the first place. The fact that the NYT, below, is falling all over themselves about Blackwater being "corporatized" is the icing on the cake, I figure. :-).. Cheers, RAH - -------- <http://www.nytimes.com/2004/04/02/national/02SECU.html?amp;ei=5053&en =3cdd2de47756be57&partner=NYTHEADLINES_NAT&ex=1081573200&pagewanted=pr int&position=> The New York Times April 2, 2004 SECURITY Private U.S. Guards Take Big Risks for Right Price By JAMES DAO OYOCK, N.C., April 1 - Nestled inconspicuously amid the pinelands and horse farms of northeastern North Carolina lies a small but increasingly important part of the nation's campaign to stabilize Iraq. Here, at the 6,000-acre training ground of Blackwater U.S.A., scores of former military commandos, police officers and civilians are prepared each month to join the lucrative but often deadly work of providing security for corporations and governments in the toughest corners of the globe. On Wednesday, four employees of a Blackwater unit - most of them former American military Special Operations personnel - were killed in an ambush in the central Iraqi city of Falluja, their bodies mutilated and dragged through the streets by chanting crowds. The scene, captured in horrific detail by television and newspaper cameras, shocked the nation and outraged the tightly knit community of current and former Special Operations personnel. But it also shed new light on the rapidly growing and loosely regulated industry of private paramilitary companies like Blackwater that are replacing government troops in conflicts from South America to Africa to the Middle East. "This is basically a new phenomenon: corporatized private military services doing the front-line work soldiers used to do," said Peter W. Singer, a national security fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington who has written a book on the industry, "Corporate Warriors" (Cornell University Press, 2003). "And they're not out there screening passengers at the airports," Mr. Singer said. "They're taking mortar and sniper fire." The Associated Press identified three of the victims as Jerry Zovko, 32, an Army veteran from Willoughby, Ohio; Mike Teague, a 38-year-old Army veteran from Clarksville, Tenn.; and Scott Helvenston, 38, a veteran of the Navy. Blackwater declined to identify the dead men, but issued a statement: "We grieve today for the loss of our colleagues and we pray for their families. The graphic images of the unprovoked attack and subsequent heinous mistreatment of our friends exhibits the extraordinary conditions under which we voluntarily work to bring freedom and democracy to the Iraqi people." Though there have been private militaries since the dawn of war, the modern corporate version got its start in the 1990's after the collapse of the Soviet Union. At that time, many nations were sharply reducing their military forces, leaving millions of soldiers without employment. Many of them went into business doing what they knew best: providing security or training others to do the same. The proliferation of ethnic conflicts and civil wars in places like the Balkans, Haiti and Liberia provided employment for the personnel of many new companies. Business grew rapidly after the Sept. 11 attacks prompted corporate executives and government officials to bolster their security overseas. But it was the occupation of Iraq that brought explosive growth to the young industry, security experts said. There are now dozens, perhaps hundreds of private military concerns around the world. As many as two dozen companies, employing as many as 15,000 people, are working in Iraq. They are providing security details for diplomats, private contractors involved in reconstruction, nonprofit organizations and journalists, security experts said. The private guards also protect oil fields, banks, residential compounds and office buildings. Though many of the companies are American, others from Britain, South Africa and elsewhere are providing security in Iraq. Among them is Global Risks Strategies, a British company that hired Fijian troops to help protect armored shipments of the new Iraqi currency around the country. Blackwater is typical of the new breed. Founded in 1998 by former Navy Seals, the company says it has prepared tens of thousands of security personnel to work in hot spots around the world. At its complex in North Carolina, it has shooting ranges for high-powered weapons, buildings for simulating hostage rescue missions and a bunkhouse for trainees. The Blackwater installation is so modern and well-equipped that Navy Seals stationed at the Little Creek Naval Amphibious Base in Norfolk, Va., routinely use it, military officials said. So do police units from around the country, who come to Blackwater for specialized training. "It's world class," said Chris Amos, a spokesman for the Norfolk Police Department. In Iraq, Blackwater personnel guard L. Paul Bremer III, the head of the civilian administration, among their other jobs. Around Baghdad, the Blackwater guards, most in their 30's and 40's, are easily identified, with their heavily muscled upper bodies, closely cropped hair or shaven heads and wrap-around sunglasses. Some even wear Blackwater T-shirts. Like Special Operations Forces, they use walkie-talkie earpieces with curled wires disappearing beneath their collars and carry light-weight automatic weapons. In the northern city of Mosul, where Mr. Bremer met with about 130 carefully vetted Iraqis on Thursday, Blackwater guards maintained a heavy presence, standing along the walls facing the Iraqi guests with their rifles cradled. More than once, Iraqis and Western reporters moving forward to take their seats in the hall were abruptly challenged by the guards, with warnings that they would be ejected if they resisted. The company also received a five-year Navy contract in 2002 worth $35.7 million to train Navy personnel in force protection, shipboard security, search-and-seizure techniques, and armed sentry duties, Pentagon officials said. The rapid growth of the private security industry has come about in part because of the shrinkage of the American military: there are simply fewer military personnel available to protect officials, diplomats and bases overseas, security experts say. To meet the rising demand, the companies are offering yearly salaries ranging from $100,000 to nearly $200,000 to entice senior military Special Operations forces to switch careers. Assignments are paying from a few hundred dollars to as much as $1,000 a day, military officials said. Gen. Wayne Downing, a retired chief of the United States Special Operations Command, said that on a recent trip to Baghdad he ran into several former Delta Force and Seal Team Six senior noncommissioned officers who were working for private security companies. "It was like a reunion," General Downing said. Sheriff Susan Johnson of Currituck County, N.C., where the entrance to Blackwater is situated, said several of her deputies had been lured away by the company to work overseas. "It's tough to keep them when they can earn as much in one month there as they can in a year here," Sheriff Johnson said. But critics say the rapid growth of the industry raises troubling concerns. There is little regulation of the quality of training or recruitment by private companies, they say. The result may be inexperienced, poorly prepared and weakly led units playing vital roles in combat situations. Even elite former commandos may not be well trained for every danger, those critics say. Representative Jan Schakowsky, Democrat of Illinois, has also argued that the United States' growing use of private military companies hides the financial, personal and political costs of military operations overseas, since the concerns face little public scrutiny. In particular, Ms. Schakowsky has objected to administration plans to increase the number of private military contractors in Colombia, where three American civilians working for a Northrup Grumman subsidiary have been held hostage by Marxist rebels for more than a year. The three were on a mission to search for cocaine laboratories and drug planes when they were captured. "I continue to oppose the use of military contractors who are not subject to the same kind of scrutiny and accountability as U.S. soldiers," Ms. Schakowsky said last week. "When things go wrong for these contractors, they and their families have been shamefully forgotten by their American employers." Eric Schmitt, in Washington, and John F. Burns, in Baghdad, contributed reporting for this article. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP 8.0.3 iQA/AwUBQG2KjcPxH8jf3ohaEQKs4gCeO65LBKmtmf7DhdMAbqMxOBpNsn0AmgNB bsdPBhZkDK1ce3TbN9zHVU71 =JS06 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0

[IP] U.S. may need to step in, says cybersecurity report
by Dave Farber 02 Apr '04

02 Apr '04

Thursday, April 01, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M. U.S. may need to step in, says cybersecurity report By Ted Bridis The Associated Press WASHINGTON - In a surprise shift, leading software companies acknowledge in a report to the Bush administration that the government might need to force the U.S. technology industry to improve the security of America's computer networks. The companies, including Microsoft and Computer Associates International, said the Homeland Security Department "should examine whether tailored government action is necessary" to compel improvements in the design of computer software. The 250-page report containing that recommendation and dozens more is being released today. It cautions that government should require security improvements only when market forces fail. It also says businesses already are demanding software that is safer and more resilient to attacks. But the report says the most sensitive computer networks - such as those operating banks, telephone networks or water pipelines - "may require a greater level of security than the market will provide." In those cases, the software companies recommend "appropriate and tailored government action that interferes with market innovation on security as little as possible." It urged the government to work with companies to produce a formal study during the 2005 fiscal year, which begins in October. The public acknowledgment that any level of new government regulation might be needed to improve software security represents an important shift by the technology industry. It has vigorously contested mandates from Washington during the past decade, even in the face of increasingly devastating attacks by new generations of hackers and viruses. "That's a big lean in the right direction," said Alan Paller of the SANS Institute in Bethesda, Md., a computer-security organization. "It's a nod to reality; they're nodding but they've got their heels dug in." The industry recommendations were solicited by the Homeland Security Department's cybersecurity division in December. Other recommendations include: * Spending at least $12 million, including $6 million in government money, during the next 19 months for a dozen new academic fellowships nationwide to teach future computer engineers to design safer software. * Providing unspecified incentives to companies for reducing software defects. * Offering bounties for information leading to the conviction of hackers and virus writers. * Establishing a cybersecurity report card for operators of the most important computer networks. * Setting up a government laboratory to keep track of software repairing patches and test how effectively they work. ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as rah(a)shipwright.com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0

[IP] U.S. may need to step in, says cybersecurity report
by Dave Farber 02 Apr '04

02 Apr '04

Thursday, April 01, 2004 - Page updated at 12:00 A.M. U.S. may need to step in, says cybersecurity report By Ted Bridis The Associated Press WASHINGTON - In a surprise shift, leading software companies acknowledge in a report to the Bush administration that the government might need to force the U.S. technology industry to improve the security of America's computer networks. The companies, including Microsoft and Computer Associates International, said the Homeland Security Department "should examine whether tailored government action is necessary" to compel improvements in the design of computer software. The 250-page report containing that recommendation and dozens more is being released today. It cautions that government should require security improvements only when market forces fail. It also says businesses already are demanding software that is safer and more resilient to attacks. But the report says the most sensitive computer networks - such as those operating banks, telephone networks or water pipelines - "may require a greater level of security than the market will provide." In those cases, the software companies recommend "appropriate and tailored government action that interferes with market innovation on security as little as possible." It urged the government to work with companies to produce a formal study during the 2005 fiscal year, which begins in October. The public acknowledgment that any level of new government regulation might be needed to improve software security represents an important shift by the technology industry. It has vigorously contested mandates from Washington during the past decade, even in the face of increasingly devastating attacks by new generations of hackers and viruses. "That's a big lean in the right direction," said Alan Paller of the SANS Institute in Bethesda, Md., a computer-security organization. "It's a nod to reality; they're nodding but they've got their heels dug in." The industry recommendations were solicited by the Homeland Security Department's cybersecurity division in December. Other recommendations include: * Spending at least $12 million, including $6 million in government money, during the next 19 months for a dozen new academic fellowships nationwide to teach future computer engineers to design safer software. * Providing unspecified incentives to companies for reducing software defects. * Offering bounties for information leading to the conviction of hackers and virus writers. * Establishing a cybersecurity report card for operators of the most important computer networks. * Setting up a government laboratory to keep track of software repairing patches and test how effectively they work. ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as rah(a)shipwright.com To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0

Re: [Politech] John Gilmore on the homeless, RFID tags, and kittens
by Nomen Nescio 02 Apr '04

02 Apr '04

At 05:39 PM 4/1/04 -0500, Steve Furlong wrote: >On Thu, 2004-04-01 at 16:21, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > >> Tastes just like chicken? > >Can we change the subject? My girlfriend is Chinese, Does she have a chip implant? I've already eaten >things that I wouldn't have considered to be food Ask her to shower first > she doesn't like my >cat Get a new girlfriend

1 0

[IP] U.S. may need to step in, says cybersecurity report
by R. A. Hettinga 01 Apr '04

01 Apr '04

Two hints: 1. It's not the camel's nose, and, 2. It's not your tent, either. Cheers, RAH --- begin forwarded text

1 0

Blackwater
by Major Variola (ret.) 01 Apr '04

01 Apr '04

http://web.archive.org/web/*/www.blackwatersecurity.com Blackwater had no web pages before Aug 2002. Funny how the 0wn3d media doesn't question the "consultant" label.

1 0

Re: [Politech] John Gilmore on the homeless, RFID tags, and kittens
by Major Variola (ret) 01 Apr '04

01 Apr '04

At 03:22 PM 4/1/04 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote: > >Last year I found it almost impossible to adopt a kitten or cat that >didn't have an RFID tag implanted under its skin. What is his problem? You just put them in the microwave and the chip is useless.

3 2

Re: Mercs need to wear clean underwear
by Major Variola (ret) 01 Apr '04

01 Apr '04

At 01:41 PM 4/1/04 -0500, R. A. Hettinga wrote: >More to the point, once you cleaned out a bunch of injuns, *somebody* >had to ranch the land, right? Well of course. It was our destiny, our mission. Just like bringing democracy (tm) to the a-rabs, etc. If, of course, they vote for our puppets, and their presses print what we like.

2 1