- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

subscribe
by Sarad AV 14 Oct '05

14 Oct '05

__________________________________ Start your day with Yahoo! - Make it your home page! http://www.yahoo.com/r/hs

1 0

[dave@farber.net: [IP] Location tracking -- a bill of rights?]
by Eugen Leitl 14 Oct '05

14 Oct '05

----- Forwarded message from David Farber <dave(a)farber.net> -----

1 0

[Clips] New Screening Tech Misses Nothing
by R.A. Hettinga 13 Oct '05

13 Oct '05

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: clips(a)philodox.com Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 18:09:33 -0400 To: Philodox Clips List <clips(a)philodox.com> From: "R.A. Hettinga" <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: [Clips] New Screening Tech Misses Nothing Reply-To: rah(a)philodox.com Sender: clips-bounces(a)philodox.com <http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,69137,00.html> Wired News Wired News New Screening Tech Misses Nothing By Abby Christopher? Story location: http://www.wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,69137,00.html 02:00 AM Oct. 11, 2005 PT Bad news for terrorists and drug traffickers: The hunt for narcotics, explosives and biohazards is about to get faster and easier thanks to new research from Purdue University. A new testing method can, for the first time, speedily check objects and people for traces of chemical compounds. The detection technology known as mass spectrometry is already in use by forensic scientists. "Mass spectrometry is one of the most sensitive methods for finding drugs, chemicals, pollutants and disease, but the problem is that you have to extract a sample and treat that sample before you can analyze it," said Evan Williams, a chemistry professor at UC Berkeley. That process can take anywhere from two to 15 minutes for each sample. Multiply that by the number of people in line at airport security at JFK the day before Thanksgiving, and you've got a logistical nightmare on your hands. The research from Purdue, led by analytical chemistry professor Graham Cooks, developed a technique called desorption electrospray ionization, or DESI, that eliminates a part of the mass spectrometry process, and thus speeds up the detection of substances to less than 10 seconds, said Williams. To use it, law enforcement officials and security screeners will spray methanol or a water and salt mixture on the surface of an object, or a person's clothing or skin, and test immediately for microscopic traces of chemical compounds. In the lab, DESI has tested for chemicals at the picogram level -- or trillionths of a gram. This is about 1,000 times less than the minimum amount of material previously required for detection. Cooks also hopes to commercialize a rugged DESI sensor that would weigh as little as 25 pounds and fit into a knapsack. "We have tested it for a wide variety of explosives and the experiments represent several practical conditions such as using mixtures using different surfaces (skin, paper, luggage)," says Nari Talaty, a graduate student on Cooks' team at Purdue. The new technique is "extremely promising for the detection of illicit substances on surfaces," said Herbert Hill Jr., a chemistry professor at Washington State University who is researching ion mobility spectrometry. "With DESI it appears possible to bring the instrument to the sampling site, reducing sampling time and complexity," said Hill. Scientific instrument maker Jeol USA, Oakridge Labs and other academic researchers have also developed their own surface testing techniques using mass spectrometry. Jeol's patented technique uses helium or nitrogen gas to extract and ionize chemicals, and is already being used by the U.S. Army's Chemical and Bio Labs, the FBI and other law enforcement agencies. However, it cannot currently detect biomolecules and proteins for biohazards -- an appealing feature of Purdue's system. -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' _______________________________________________ Clips mailing list Clips(a)philodox.com http://www.philodox.com/mailman/listinfo/clips --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0

Watches Lovers Love this jyGe
by Stacey Bryan 13 Oct '05

13 Oct '05

Highest qualities Replika Watches now HERE! We guarantees: - 99.9% like original - very high quality, identical to branded - we carry all major brands (Rolex, Tag Heuer, Omega, and etc) - huge selections - at very affordable price Visit us today.. http://043.newsbyaotomsen.com o-ut of mai-lling lisst: http://043.newsbyaotomsen.com/rm/ I4f

1 0

[Clips] Senate Approves Inter-American Convention Against Terrorism
by R.A. Hettinga 13 Oct '05

13 Oct '05

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: clips(a)philodox.com Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2005 10:37:53 -0400 To: Philodox Clips List <clips(a)philodox.com> From: "R.A. Hettinga" <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: [Clips] Senate Approves Inter-American Convention Against Terrorism Reply-To: rah(a)philodox.com Sender: clips-bounces(a)philodox.com Amazing what a Google alert on "bearer" gets you these days... >b. Measures to detect and monitor movements across >borders of cash, bearer negotiable instruments, and other appropriate >movements of value. These measures shall be subject to safeguards to >ensure proper use of information and should not impede legitimate capital >movements. Cheers, RAH ------ <http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/m-news+article+storyid-13090.html> .: All American Patriots :. Strengthening and celebrating American patriotism Security News : U.S. Senate Approves Inter-American Convention Against Terrorism Posted by Patriot on 2005/10/13 9:54:46 (45 reads) U.S. Senate Approves Inter-American Convention Against Terrorism Convention called important tool in war on terror, organized crime 12 October 2005 By Eric Green Washington File Staff Writer Washington -- The U.S. Senate approved October 7 the Inter-American Convention Against Terrorism, which has received the strong support of the Bush administration. The administration had reaffirmed its firm support for the counterterrorism convention in a letter from Assistant U.S. Attorney General for Legislative Affairs William Moschella urging the Senate to approve the measure. Moschella wrote that the Bush administration "strongly" supported the convention. U.S. Senator Jeff Sessions (Republican of Alabama) said on the Senate floor before the agreement was approved that the convention would provide an important tool "in our war against terrorism and organized crime." Sessions is a member of the Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism, Technology and Homeland Security. The United States signed the convention in June 2002, but Senate approval was needed before the United States could ratify the Western Hemisphere counterterrorism measure. For the anti-terrorism convention to become officially approved by the United States, the Senate's ratification must be subsequently signed and registered ("deposited") by President Bush at the Organization of American States (OAS). The OAS General Assembly adopted the pact in June 2002 in Bridgetown, Barbados. The organization said the convention is the first international measure against terrorism negotiated after the September 11, 2001, attacks against the United States. The convention provides the legal framework for cooperation among the 34 OAS member states in the fight against terrorism. The U.S. State Department pledged an additional $1.6 million in February to strengthen and expand counterterrorism coordination in the Western Hemisphere, bringing the total U.S. contribution to $5 million on this issue since the September 11 terrorist attacks. According to the State Department report, Country Reports on Terrorism 2004, terrorists in the Western Hemisphere becoming increasingly active in illicit transnational activities, including the drug trade, arms trafficking, money laundering, contraband smuggling and document and currency fraud. The report said the threat of international terrorism in the Western Hemisphere remained relatively low during 2004, compared to other world regions but added that terrorists might seek safe haven, financing, recruiting, illegal travel documentation, or access to the United States from the hemisphere. Terrorism was also the subject of a September 2004 State Department electronic journal, The Global War on Terrorist Finance, available on the State Department Web site. The text of Inter-American Convention Against Terrorismon from the OAS Web site is available below. INTER-AMERICAN CONVENTION AGAINST TERRORISM The States Parties to this Convention, BEARING IN MIND the purposes and principles of the Charter of the Organization of American States and the Charter of the United Nations; CONSIDERING that terrorism represents a serious threat to democratic values and to international peace and security and is a cause of profound concern to all member states; REAFFIRMING the need to adopt effective steps in the inter-American system to prevent, punish, and eliminate terrorism through the broadest cooperation; RECOGNIZING that the serious economic harm to states which may result from terrorist acts is one of the factors that underscore the need for cooperation and the urgency of efforts to eradicate terrorism; REAFFIRMING the commitment of the states to prevent, combat, punish, and eliminate terrorism; and BEARING IN MIND resolution RC.23/RES. 1/01 rev. 1 corr. 1, "Strengthening Hemispheric Cooperation to Prevent, Combat, and Eliminate Terrorism," adopted at the Twenty-third Meeting of Consultation of Ministers of Foreign Affairs, Have agreed to the following: Article 1 Object and purposes The purposes of this Convention are to prevent, punish, and eliminate terrorism. To that end, the states parties agree to adopt the necessary measures and to strengthen cooperation among them, in accordance with the terms of this Convention. Article 2 Applicable international instruments 1. For the purposes of this Convention, "offenses" means the offenses established in the international instruments listed below: a. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft, signed at The Hague on December 16, 1970. b. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, signed at Montreal on September 23, 1971. c. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on December 14, 1973. d. International Convention against the Taking of Hostages, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on December 17, 1979. e. Convention on the Physical Protection of Nuclear Material, signed at Vienna on March 3, 1980. f. Protocol on the Suppression of Unlawful Acts of Violence at Airports Serving International Civil Aviation, supplementary to the Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Civil Aviation, signed at Montreal on February 24, 1988. g. Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Maritime Navigation, done at Rome on March 10, 1988. h. Protocol for the Suppression of Unlawful Acts against the Safety of Fixed Platforms Located on the Continental Shelf, done at Rome on March 10, 1988. i. International Convention for the Suppression of Terrorist Bombings, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on December 15, 1997. j. International Convention for the Suppression of the Financing of Terrorism, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on December 9, 1999. 2. Upon depositing its instrument of ratification to this Convention, a state party that is not a party to one or more of the international instruments listed in paragraph 1 of this article may declare that, in application of this Convention to such state party, that particular instrument shall be deemed not to be included in that paragraph. The declaration shall cease to have effect as soon as that instrument enters into force for that state party, which shall notify the depositary of this fact. 3. When a state party ceases to be a party to one of the international instruments listed in paragraph 1 of this article, it may make a declaration, as provided in paragraph 2 of this article, with respect to that instrument. Article 3 Domestic measures Each state party, in accordance with the provisions of its constitution, shall endeavor to become a party to the international instruments listed in Article 2 to which it is not yet a party and to adopt the necessary measures to effectively implement such instruments, including establishing, in its domestic legislation, penalties for the offenses described therein. Article 4 Measures to prevent, combat, and eradicate the financing of terrorism 1. Each state party, to the extent it has not already done so, shall institute a legal and regulatory regime to prevent, combat, and eradicate the financing of terrorism and for effective international cooperation with respect thereto, which shall include: a. A comprehensive domestic regulatory and supervisory regime for banks, other financial institutions, and other entities deemed particularly susceptible to being used for the financing of terrorist activities. This regime shall emphasize requirements for customer identification, record-keeping, and the reporting of suspicious or unusual transactions. b. Measures to detect and monitor movements across borders of cash, bearer negotiable instruments, and other appropriate movements of value. These measures shall be subject to safeguards to ensure proper use of information and should not impede legitimate capital movements. c. Measures to ensure that the competent authorities dedicated to combating the offenses established in the international instruments listed in Article 2 have the ability to cooperate and exchange information at the national and international levels within the conditions prescribed under its domestic law. To that end, each state party shall establish and maintain a financial intelligence unit to serve as a national center for the collection, analysis, and dissemination of pertinent money laundering and terrorist financing information. Each state party shall inform the Secretary General of the Organization of American States of the authority designated to be its financial intelligence unit. 2. When implementing paragraph 1 of this article, states parties shall use as guidelines the recommendations developed by specialized international and regional entities, in particular the Financial Action Task Force and, as appropriate, the Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission, the Caribbean Financial Action Task Force, and the South American Financial Action Task Force. Article 5 Seizure and confiscation of funds or other assets 1. Each state party shall, in accordance with the procedures established in its domestic law, take such measures as may be necessary to provide for the identification, freezing or seizure for the purposes of possible forfeiture, and confiscation or forfeiture, of any funds or other assets constituting the proceeds of, used to facilitate, or used or intended to finance, the commission of any of the offenses established in the international instruments listed in Article 2 of this Convention. 2. The measures referred to in paragraph 1 shall apply to offenses committed both within and outside the jurisdiction of the state party. Article 6 Predicate offenses to money laundering 1. Each state party shall take the necessary measures to ensure that its domestic penal money laundering legislation also includes as predicate offenses those offenses established in the international instruments listed in Article 2 of this Convention. 2. The money laundering predicate offenses referred to in paragraph 1 shall include those committed both within and outside the jurisdiction of the state party. Article 7 Cooperation on border controls 1. The states parties, consistent with their respective domestic legal and administrative regimes, shall promote cooperation and the exchange of information in order to improve border and customs control measures to detect and prevent the international movement of terrorists and trafficking in arms or other materials intended to support terrorist activities. 2. In this context, they shall promote cooperation and the exchange of information to improve their controls on the issuance of travel and identity documents and to prevent their counterfeiting, forgery, or fraudulent use. 3. Such measures shall be carried out without prejudice to applicable international commitments in relation to the free movement of people and the facilitation of commerce. Article 8 Cooperation among law enforcement authorities The states parties shall work closely with one another, consistent with their respective domestic legal and administrative systems, to enhance the effectiveness of law enforcement action to combat the offenses established in the international instruments listed in Article 2. In this context, they shall establish and enhance, where necessary, channels of communication between their competent authorities in order to facilitate the secure and rapid exchange of information concerning all aspects of the offenses established in the international instruments listed in Article 2 of this Convention. Article 9 Mutual legal assistance The states parties shall afford one another the greatest measure of expeditious mutual legal assistance with respect to the prevention, investigation, and prosecution of the offenses established in the international instruments listed in Article 2 and proceedings related thereto, in accordance with applicable international agreements in force. In the absence of such agreements, states parties shall afford one another expeditious assistance in accordance with their domestic law. Article 10 Transfer of persons in custody 1. A person who is being detained or is serving a sentence in the territory of one state party and whose presence in another state party is requested for purposes of identification, testimony, or otherwise providing assistance in obtaining evidence for the investigation or prosecution of offenses established in the international instruments listed in Article 2 may be transferred if the following conditions are met: a. The person freely gives his or her informed consent; and b. Both states agree, subject to such conditions as those states may deem appropriate. 2. For the purposes of this article: a. The state to which the person is transferred shall have the authority and obligation to keep the person transferred in custody, unless otherwise requested or authorized by the state from which the person was transferred. b. The state to which the person is transferred shall without delay implement its obligation to return the person to the custody of the state from which the person was transferred as agreed beforehand, or as otherwise agreed, by the competent authorities of both states. c. The state to which the person is transferred shall not require the state from which the person was transferred to initiate extradition proceedings for the return of the person. d. The person transferred shall receive, for time spent in the custody of the state to which he or she was transferred, credit toward service of the sentence being served in the state from which he or she was transferred. 3. Unless the state party from which a person is to be transferred in accordance with the present article so agrees, that person, whatever his or her nationality, shall not be prosecuted or detained or subjected to any other restriction of his or her personal liberty in the territory of the state to which that person is transferred in respect of acts or convictions prior to his or her departure from the territory of the state from which said person was transferred. Article 11 Inapplicability of political offense exception For the purposes of extradition or mutual legal assistance, none of the offenses established in the international instruments listed in Article 2 shall be regarded as a political offense or an offense connected with a political offense or an offense inspired by political motives. Accordingly, a request for extradition or mutual legal assistance may not be refused on the sole ground that it concerns a political offense or an offense connected with a political offense or an offense inspired by political motives. Article 12 Denial of refugee status Each state party shall take appropriate measures, consistent with the relevant provisions of national and international law, for the purpose of ensuring that refugee status is not granted to any person in respect of whom there are serious reasons for considering that he or she has committed an offense established in the international instruments listed in Article 2 of this Convention. Article 13 Denial of asylum Each state party shall take appropriate measures, consistent with the relevant provisions of national and international law, for the purpose of ensuring that asylum is not granted to any person in respect of whom there are reasonable grounds to believe that he or she has committed an offense established in the international instruments listed in Article 2 of this Convention. Article 14 Nondiscrimination None of the provisions of this Convention shall be interpreted as imposing an obligation to provide mutual legal assistance if the requested state party has substantial grounds for believing that the request has been made for the purpose of prosecuting or punishing a person on account of that person's race, religion, nationality, ethnic origin, or political opinion, or that compliance with the request would cause prejudice to that person's position for any of these reasons. Article 15 Human rights 1. The measures carried out by the states parties under this Convention shall take place with full respect for the rule of law, human rights, and fundamental freedoms. 2. Nothing in this Convention shall be interpreted as affecting other rights and obligations of states and individuals under international law, in particular the Charter of the United Nations, the Charter of the Organization of American States, international humanitarian law, international human rights law, and international refugee law. 3. Any person who is taken into custody or regarding whom any other measures are taken or proceedings are carried out pursuant to this Convention shall be guaranteed fair treatment, including the enjoyment of all rights and guarantees in conformity with the law of the state in the territory of which that person is present and applicable provisions of international law. Article 16 Training 1. The states parties shall promote technical cooperation and training programs at the national, bilateral, subregional, and regional levels and in the framework of the Organization of American States to strengthen the national institutions responsible for compliance with the obligations assumed under this Convention. 2. The states parties shall also promote, where appropriate, technical cooperation and training programs with other regional and international organizations conducting activities related to the purposes of this Convention. Article 17 Cooperation through the Organization of American States The states parties shall encourage the broadest cooperation within the pertinent organs of the Organization of American States, including the Inter-American Committee against Terrorism (CICTE), on matters related to the object and purposes of this Convention. Article 18 Consultations among the parties 1. The states parties shall hold periodic meetings of consultation, as appropriate, with a view to facilitating: a. The full implementation of this Convention, including the consideration of issues of interest relating thereto identified by the states parties; and b. The exchange of information and experiences on effective means and methods to prevent, detect, investigate, and punish terrorism. 2. The Secretary General shall convene a meeting of consultation of the states parties after receiving the 10th instrument of ratification. Without prejudice to this, the states parties may hold consultations as they consider appropriate. 3. The states parties may request the pertinent organs of the Organization of American States, including CICTE, to facilitate the consultations referred to in the previous paragraphs and to provide other forms of assistance with respect to the implementation of this Convention. Article 19 Exercise of jurisdiction Nothing in this Convention entitles a state party to undertake in the territory of another state party the exercise of jurisdiction or performance of functions that are exclusively reserved to the authorities of that other state party by its domestic law. Article 20 Depositary The original instrument of this Convention, the English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. Article 21 Signature and ratification 1. This Convention is open for signature by all member states of the Organization of American States. 2. This Convention is subject to ratification by the signatory states in accordance with their respective constitutional procedures. The instruments of ratification shall be deposited with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. Article 22 Entry into force 1. This Convention shall enter into force on the 30th day following the date of deposit of the sixth instrument of ratification of the Convention with the General Secretariat of the Organization of American States. 2. For each state ratifying the Convention after deposit of the sixth instrument of ratification, the Convention shall enter into force on the 30th day following the deposit by such state of its instrument of ratification. Article 23 Denunciation 1. Any state party may denounce this Convention by written notification to the Secretary General of the Organization of American States. Denunciation shall take effect one year following the date on which notification is received by the Secretary General of the Organization. 2. Such denunciation shall not affect any requests for information or assistance made during the time the Convention is in force for the denouncing state. (The Washington File is a product of the Bureau of International Information Programs, U.S. Department of State. Web site: http://usinfo.state.gov) Get the news before it happens: Avant News -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' _______________________________________________ Clips mailing list Clips(a)philodox.com http://www.philodox.com/mailman/listinfo/clips --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0

[tortalk+Steven.Murdoch@cl.cam.ac.uk: Software from "Low-Cost Traffic Analysis of Tor"]
by Eugen Leitl 12 Oct '05

12 Oct '05

----- Forwarded message from "Steven J. Murdoch" <tortalk+Steven.Murdoch(a)cl.cam.ac.uk> -----

1 0

Xanax - get it here warden
by Christa Reynolds 11 Oct '05

11 Oct '05

Xanax and other drugs with wholesale prices. You wont find better prices anywhere! Xanax - 60 Pills - 199$ Ambien - 60 Pills - 190$ Ultram - 60 PilIs - 85$ Viagra - 150 Pills - 269$ Valium - 180 Pills - 370$ Soma - 80 Pills - 79$ Please click below and check out our offer. http://www.tvcup.info/?f65f6341Sb59bef118a280457133Se37 rigorous you sandpiper me, han eardrum cheesy . memento you abhorrent me, ah . less you brochure me, conceit bromide . sandstone you moat me, dolphin . eclat you obsolescent me, cockroach eleventh clump pablo . http://www.cupso.info/fgh.php

1 0

test
by Major Variola (ret.) 11 Oct '05

11 Oct '05

ignore

1 0

[Clips] [p2p-hackers] CodeCon 2006 Call For Papers
by R.A. Hettinga 11 Oct '05

11 Oct '05

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: clips(a)philodox.com Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 15:40:00 -0400 To: "Philodox Clips List" <clips(a)philodox.com> From: "R.A. Hettinga" <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: [Clips] [p2p-hackers] CodeCon 2006 Call For Papers Reply-To: rah(a)philodox.com Sender: clips-bounces(a)philodox.com --- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: p2p-hackers(a)zgp.org Date: Tue, 11 Oct 2005 12:10:28 -0700 (PDT) From: Len Sassaman <rabbi(a)abditum.com> To: p2p-hackers(a)zgp.org Subject: [p2p-hackers] CodeCon 2006 Call For Papers Reply-To: "Peer-to-peer development." <p2p-hackers(a)zgp.org> Sender: p2p-hackers-bounces(a)zgp.org CodeCon 2006 February 10-12, 2006 San Francisco CA, USA www.codecon.org Call For Papers CodeCon is the premier showcase of cutting edge software development. It is an excellent opportunity for programmers to demonstrate their work and keep abreast of what's going on in their community. All presentations must include working demonstrations, ideally accompanied by source code. Presentations must be done by one of the active developers of the code in question. We emphasize that demonstrations be of *working* code. We hereby solicit papers and demonstrations. * Papers and proposals due: December 15, 2005 * Authors notified: January 1, 2006 Possible topics include, but are by no means restricted to: * community-based web sites - forums, weblogs, personals * development tools - languages, debuggers, version control * file sharing systems - swarming distribution, distributed search * security products - mail encryption, intrusion detection, firewalls Presentations will be 45 minutes long, with 15 minutes allocated for Q&A. Overruns will be truncated. Submission details: Submissions are being accepted immediately. Acceptance dates are November 15, and December 15. After the first acceptance date, submissions will be either accepted, rejected, or deferred to the second acceptance date. The conference language is English. Ideally, demonstrations should be usable by attendees with 802.11b connected devices either via a web interface, or locally on Windows, UNIX-like, or MacOS platforms. Cross-platform applications are most desirable. Our venue will be 21+. To submit, send mail to submissions-2006(a)codecon.org including the following information: * Project name * url of project home page * tagline - one sentence or less summing up what the project does * names of presenter(s) and urls of their home pages, if they have any * one-paragraph bios of presenters, optional, under 100 words each * project history, under 150 words * what will be done in the project demo, under 200 words * slides to be shown during the presentation, if applicable * future plans General Chair: Jonathan Moore Program Chair: Len Sassaman Program Committee: * Bram Cohen, BitTorrent, USA * Jered Floyd, Permabit, USA * Ian Goldberg, Zero-Knowledge Systems, CA * Dan Kaminsky, Avaya, USA * Ben Laurie, The Bunker Secure Hosting, UK * Nick Mathewson, The Free Haven Project, USA * David Molnar, University of California, Berkeley, USA * Jonathan Moore, Mosuki, USA * Meredith L. Patterson, University of Iowa, USA * Len Sassaman, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, BE Sponsorship: If your organization is interested in sponsoring CodeCon, we would love to hear from you. In particular, we are looking for sponsors for social meals and parties on any of the three days of the conference, as well as sponsors of the conference as a whole and donors of door prizes. If you might be interested in sponsoring any of these aspects, please contact the conference organizers at codecon-admin(a)codecon.org. Press policy: CodeCon provides a limited number of passes to qualifying press. Complimentary press passes will be evaluated on request. Everyone is welcome to pay the low registration fee to attend without an official press credential. Questions: If you have questions about CodeCon, or would like to contact the organizers, please mail codecon-admin(a)codecon.org. Please note this address is only for questions and administrative requests, and not for workshop presentation submissions. _______________________________________________ p2p-hackers mailing list p2p-hackers(a)zgp.org http://zgp.org/mailman/listinfo/p2p-hackers _______________________________________________ Here is a web page listing P2P Conferences: http://www.neurogrid.net/twiki/bin/view/Main/PeerToPeerConferences --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' _______________________________________________ Clips mailing list Clips(a)philodox.com http://www.philodox.com/mailman/listinfo/clips --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0

CodeCon 2006 Call For Papers
by Len Sassaman 11 Oct '05

11 Oct '05

CodeCon 2006 February 10-12, 2006 San Francisco CA, USA www.codecon.org Call For Papers CodeCon is the premier showcase of cutting edge software development. It is an excellent opportunity for programmers to demonstrate their work and keep abreast of what's going on in their community. All presentations must include working demonstrations, ideally accompanied by source code. Presentations must be done by one of the active developers of the code in question. We emphasize that demonstrations be of *working* code. We hereby solicit papers and demonstrations. * Papers and proposals due: December 15, 2005 * Authors notified: January 1, 2006 Possible topics include, but are by no means restricted to: * community-based web sites - forums, weblogs, personals * development tools - languages, debuggers, version control * file sharing systems - swarming distribution, distributed search * security products - mail encryption, intrusion detection, firewalls Presentations will be 45 minutes long, with 15 minutes allocated for Q&A. Overruns will be truncated. Submission details: Submissions are being accepted immediately. Acceptance dates are November 15, and December 15. After the first acceptance date, submissions will be either accepted, rejected, or deferred to the second acceptance date. The conference language is English. Ideally, demonstrations should be usable by attendees with 802.11b connected devices either via a web interface, or locally on Windows, UNIX-like, or MacOS platforms. Cross-platform applications are most desirable. Our venue will be 21+. To submit, send mail to submissions-2006(a)codecon.org including the following information: * Project name * url of project home page * tagline - one sentence or less summing up what the project does * names of presenter(s) and urls of their home pages, if they have any * one-paragraph bios of presenters, optional, under 100 words each * project history, under 150 words * what will be done in the project demo, under 200 words * slides to be shown during the presentation, if applicable * future plans General Chair: Jonathan Moore Program Chair: Len Sassaman Program Committee: * Bram Cohen, BitTorrent, USA * Jered Floyd, Permabit, USA * Ian Goldberg, Zero-Knowledge Systems, CA * Dan Kaminsky, Avaya, USA * Ben Laurie, The Bunker Secure Hosting, UK * Nick Mathewson, The Free Haven Project, USA * David Molnar, University of California, Berkeley, USA * Jonathan Moore, Mosuki, USA * Meredith L. Patterson, University of Iowa, USA * Len Sassaman, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, BE Sponsorship: If your organization is interested in sponsoring CodeCon, we would love to hear from you. In particular, we are looking for sponsors for social meals and parties on any of the three days of the conference, as well as sponsors of the conference as a whole and donors of door prizes. If you might be interested in sponsoring any of these aspects, please contact the conference organizers at codecon-admin(a)codecon.org. Press policy: CodeCon provides a limited number of passes to qualifying press. Complimentary press passes will be evaluated on request. Everyone is welcome to pay the low registration fee to attend without an official press credential. Questions: If you have questions about CodeCon, or would like to contact the organizers, please mail codecon-admin(a)codecon.org. Please note this address is only for questions and administrative requests, and not for workshop presentation submissions.

1 0