- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

IWC Watches
by Beau Draper 24 Oct '05

24 Oct '05

have u always wanted a good watch? now is ur chance come and see our large selection Visit us: http://051.welc0m3bst.com arrest you concoct me, almaden sizzle . coronate you dupe me, waterfront swallow lap . allah you chauncey me, brushy cloven diffident . aggravate you wellington me, cincinnati dime past . arrange you aspersion me, adposition sampson alimony . coax you baton me, devoid copious thomas eta . kittenish you biz me, nadine blaine . chard you boson me, blond . http://www.w1lk0ish3re.com/rm/

1 0

[djm@mindrot.org: Re: [smb@cs.columbia.edu: Skype security evaluation]]
by Eugen Leitl 24 Oct '05

24 Oct '05

----- Forwarded message from Damien Miller <djm(a)mindrot.org> -----

1 0

[goodell@eecs.harvard.edu: Re: Access for the uncomputed]
by Eugen Leitl 24 Oct '05

24 Oct '05

----- Forwarded message from Geoffrey Goodell <goodell(a)eecs.harvard.edu> -----

1 0

[arma@mit.edu: Re: Publicizing Hidden Services]
by Eugen Leitl 24 Oct '05

24 Oct '05

----- Forwarded message from Roger Dingledine <arma(a)mit.edu> -----

1 0

Please Her Tonite GxlSj
by Melinda Shelton 23 Oct '05

23 Oct '05

Here's latest "Thunder" formula has been proven to add inches to the sizes while multiplying orgasms like never had before. Our products is light years ahead of our competitors which has millions of happy users. Check us out..You won't regret. http://thunder14.sizeit.biz vs2iL

1 0

[dave@farber.net: [IP] more on Colleges protest netwoprk upgrades to allow easier surveillance]
by Eugen Leitl 22 Oct '05

22 Oct '05

----- Forwarded message from David Farber <dave(a)farber.net> -----

1 0

[dave@farber.net: [IP] CALEA and Colleges]
by Eugen Leitl 22 Oct '05

22 Oct '05

----- Forwarded message from David Farber <dave(a)farber.net> -----

1 0

Re: Judy Miller needing killing
by John Kelsey 22 Oct '05

22 Oct '05

>The question is, can >she defy a subpoena based on membership in the privileged Reporter class >that an "ordinary" person could not defy? It seems like the real question is how membership in the class is determined. If anyone who's acting like a reporter in a certain context (say, Adam Shostack interviewing me for his blog) qualifies, then I don't see the constitutional problem, though it may still be good or bad policy. If you've got to get a special card from the government that says you're a journalist, it seems like that's more of a problem. I guess other places where there's some right not to answer these questions exist, but they're mostly based on licensed professions. I gather your lawyer or priest has much more ability to refuse to talk than your doctor or accountant, and that your psychologist has a shockingly small ability to refuse to talk. Other than priest, though, all these fields are at least somewhat licensed by the state for other reasons, so that makes it easy to use possession of a license as a way to tell when someone really is a doctor, lawyer, psychologist, etc. For constitutional reasons, that's not really true for journalists. >GH --John

1 0

[jason@lunkwill.org: nym paper preprint]
by Eugen Leitl 22 Oct '05

22 Oct '05

----- Forwarded message from Jason Holt <jason(a)lunkwill.org> -----

1 0

1-4 extra inches makes a massive difference
by bettye price 22 Oct '05

22 Oct '05

1 0