- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: That idea...
by Whitney Benson 14 Dec '05

14 Dec '05

Sir/Madam, Your primary homeloan meets the requirements for you to get generous gains. Our service will connect you with the most expert company, so that you will have more cash in your account at the end of each month. Its really that simple.. Tons of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their residences every day. Now its your turn. This quick 1 minute form will be your next step towards categorical financial security. Hoping on the best for you all. Whitney Benson Should you want not to get hold of this opening offer any further say no more.

1 0

[declan@well.com: [Politech] E.U. Parliament votes to force "data retention" on telecom, Net firms [priv]]
by Eugen Leitl 14 Dec '05

14 Dec '05

Just as well, I can spare writing up a blurb. ----- Forwarded message from Declan McCullagh <declan(a)well.com> -----

1 0

Fw: ...
by Millie Mata 13 Dec '05

13 Dec '05

Sir/Madam, Your present homeloan meets the criteria for you to receive sizable rebates. Our service will connect you with the most capable broker, so that you will have more finances in your bank account at the end of each month. Its really that simple.. Myriads of Americans are Re-Fi-Nancing their houses every day. Now its your time. This succinct 1 minute form will be your next rung on the ladder towards true percuniary security. With kind regards, Millie Mata Should you choose not to collect this opportunity any further say no more.

1 0

[Serguei.Osokine@efi.com: RE: [p2p-hackers] p2p in some place or other]
by Eugen Leitl 13 Dec '05

13 Dec '05

----- Forwarded message from Serguei Osokine <Serguei.Osokine(a)efi.com> -----

1 0

[rabbi@abditum.com: [p2p-hackers] CodeCon submission deadline reminder]
by Eugen Leitl 13 Dec '05

13 Dec '05

----- Forwarded message from Len Sassaman <rabbi(a)abditum.com> -----

1 0

[alenlpeacock@gmail.com: Re: [p2p-hackers] p2p in some place or other]
by Eugen Leitl 13 Dec '05

13 Dec '05

----- Forwarded message from Alen Peacock <alenlpeacock(a)gmail.com> -----

1 0

[gnu@toad.com: "Live Tracking of Mobile Phones Prompts Court Fights on Privacy"]
by Eugen Leitl 13 Dec '05

13 Dec '05

----- Forwarded message from John Gilmore <gnu(a)toad.com> -----

1 0

[jamespwalker@gmail.com: [FoRK] Choking the Internet]
by Eugen Leitl 13 Dec '05

13 Dec '05

----- Forwarded message from James Walker <jamespwalker(a)gmail.com> -----

1 0

[Clips] Hacker attacks in US linked to Chinese military: researchers
by R. A. Hettinga 12 Dec '05

12 Dec '05

--- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: clips(a)philodox.com Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 19:39:51 -0500 To: Philodox Clips List <clips(a)philodox.com> From: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: [Clips] Hacker attacks in US linked to Chinese military: researchers Reply-To: rah(a)philodox.com Sender: clips-bounces(a)philodox.com <http://www.breitbart.com/news/2005/12/12/051212224756.jwmkvntb.html> BREITBART.COM - Hacker attacks in US linked to Chinese military: researchers Dec 12 5:56 PM US/Eastern A systematic effort by hackers to penetrate US government and industry computer networks stems most likely from the Chinese military, the head of a leading security institute said. The attacks have been traced to the Chinese province of Guangdong, and the techniques used make it appear unlikely to come from any other source than the military, said Alan Paller, the director of the SANS Institute, an education and research organization focusing on cybersecurity. "These attacks come from someone with intense discipline. No other organization could do this if they were not a military organization," Paller said in a conference call to announced a new cybersecurity education program. In the attacks, Paller said, the perpetrators "were in and out with no keystroke errors and left no fingerprints, and created a backdoor in less than 30 minutes. How can this be done by anyone other than a military organization?" Paller said that despite what appears to be a systematic effort to target government agencies and defense contractors, defenses have remained weak in many areas. "We know about major penetrations of defense contractors," he said. Security among private-sector Pentagon contractors may not be as robust, said Paller, because "they are less willing to make it hard for mobile people to get their work done." Paller said the US government strategy appears to be to downplay the attacks, which has not helped the situation. "We have a problem that our computer networks have been terribly and deeply penetrated throughout the United States ... and we've been keeping it secret," he said. "The people who benefit from keeping it secret are the attackers." Although Paller said the hackers probably have not obtained classified documents from the Pentagon, which uses a more secure network, it is possible they stole "extremely sensitive" information. He said it has been documented that US military flight planning software from its Redstone Arsenal was stolen. Pentagon officials confirmed earlier this year that US Defense Department websites are probed hundreds of times a day by hackers, but maintained that no classified site is known to have been penetrated by hackers. The US military has code-named the recent hacker effort "Titan Rain" and has made some strides in counter-hacking to identify the attackers, Paller said. This was first reported by Time magazine. Paller said a series of attacks on British computer networks reported earlier this year may have similar goals, but seems to use different techniques. In the United States, he said there are some areas of improvement such as the case of the Air Force, which has been insisting on better security from its IT vendors. But he argued that "the fundamental error is that America's security strategy relies on writing reports rather than hardening systems." -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' _______________________________________________ Clips mailing list Clips(a)philodox.com http://www.philodox.com/mailman/listinfo/clips --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0

[Clips] Despite Govt. Funding, Universities Failing to Produce National Security Experts
by R. A. Hettinga 12 Dec '05

12 Dec '05

Reminds me of a problem with West Point graduates before the Mexican War. They made more money as engineers than they did in the Army, and Congress was going the same kind of navel-gazing exercise about paying for people who weren't going to do the jobs they were taught, at government expense, to do. More apropos of cryptography, (besides "financial cryptography is the only cryptography that matters", I mean :-)), I'm reminded of something that Whit Diffie was saying at Authors@MIT couple of years before 9/11 (Come to think of it, the FBI's Kalstrom *was* there, for extra crunchy ironic goodness). Diffie said something about how government can't actually provide computer security, that businesses are going to have to defend "themselves" from individual network-based attacks, and that was going to have interesting consequences. I refer one to the previous post about how Uncle Fed is pointing fingers at Chairman Mao about attacks on US internetworking, for a possible bit of data in this regard... So, yes, I think it's great fun that all these "policy" people, below, are being retreaded into "strategy" (in the Sloan-School business-sense of same) people, and that, guess what, they're going to not only going to be used for their "policy" skills, whatever those are, but also, and more valuably, to second-guess *governments* in their attempts to control business. Having some fun now? I thought so... Cheers, RAH --- begin forwarded text Delivered-To: clips(a)philodox.com Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 21:08:30 -0500 To: Philodox Clips List <clips(a)philodox.com> From: "R. A. Hettinga" <rah(a)shipwright.com> Subject: [Clips] Despite Govt. Funding, Universities Failing to Produce National Security Experts Reply-To: rah(a)philodox.com Sender: clips-bounces(a)philodox.com <http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,177568,00.html> Fox News Despite Govt. Funding, Universities Failing to Produce National Security Experts Tuesday, December 06, 2005 By Olivia Albrecht In 1957, the Soviet Union announced the launch of Sputnik 1, the world's first artificial satellite, bringing global attention to the emergence of sophisticated technologies and international security threats that came to characterize the Cold War period. One year after the proverbial launch of the Cold War-- recognizing the relative dearth of regional expertise-- the U.S. government, through Title VI of the National Defense Education Act, established foreign language and area studies programs at American universities such as Harvard, Columbia and Berkeley. The regional studies centers of NDEA aimed to guarantee experts of sufficient quality and quantity to meet U.S. national security needs. Today, at the height of the global war on terror, those same regional studies centers designed to develop the newest generation of international expertise to ensure our national security are failing to produce graduates willing to work for or within the government. Despite the $120 million of federal money annually allocated by Title VI of the Higher Education Act (the successor to the NDEA of 1958) to the regional studies centers, law enforcement agencies and intelligence communities are stuck outsourcing positions such as translators to foreign nationals of uncertain reliability. The worry of such a practice, of course, is that national security can easily be compromised-and indeed it has. Just this past October, for example, an Arabic translator for the Army was arrested for allegedly assisting Iraqi insurgents by stealing classified documents from the Army. Yet, even putting aside the question of whether an outsourced expert may experience a clash of loyalties at some point, there is still a void of Arabic translators: the New York Times last year reported that 120,000 hours of pre-9/11 intelligence "chatter" remains untranslated from Arabic. Unfortunately, the situation with these federally funded regional studies centers is unlike the case of Princeton Unversity's Woodrow Wilson School, which is involved in a lawsuit with the private financial support of the program. The donors, the heirs to the Robertson family who founded the center, argue that Woody-Woo (as it is affectionately named) has not met its mission of preparing students for government service, as too few of its graduates take positions in government. In fact, they are producing more iBankers, consultants, journalists and future officials for governments other than that of the United States'. In the case of the federally funded regional studies centers, the government cannot just yank their funding, like the Robertson heirs threaten to do with their $558 million grant. With the consistent flow of federal money running into these regional studies centers, which were developed to produce international experts for the needs of our national security, how is it possible that we still experience a dearth of experts willing to support the war effort and help protect this nation? With 70 percent of Ph.Ds being earned at Middle Eastern studies centers, how can the United States government afford to do without this talent? Some critics have suggested that the liberal, anti-government lean of campus politics discourages students from entering government service. Regardless of why students are choosing not to put their expertise to work for the government, the fact remains that these centers are failing to produce the national security analysts they were built to cultivate. In this post-9/11 world, the U.S. cannot afford to have Title VI produce Ph.Ds merely for the academic job market. The U.S. has other needs for these intellectual, international experts. One solution includes legislation proposed by Rep. Patrick Tiberi, R-Ohio, and Rep. John Boehner, R-Ohio. Tiberi has proposed H.R. 509, which was recently added as an amendment to Boehner's H.R. 609. H.R. 609 broadly deals with the Higher Education Act of 1965, whereas H.R. 509 addresses only Title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965 -- the regional studies centers. Addressing the distressing lack of national security personnel being graduated from these regional studies centers, the proposed amendment to Title VI of the Higher Education Act of 1965 recommends the establishment of an international higher education advisory board "to ensure that government-funded programs reflect diverse perspectives and the full range of views on world regions, foreign languages, and international affairs." The primary function of the advisory board is to recommend ways "to improve programs to better reflect the national needs related to homeland security." However, it is critical to note that the bill clearly states that the board is not authorized to "mandate, direct, or control an institution of higher education's specific instructional content, curriculum, or program of instruction." It is merely authorized to study, appraise and evaluate a sample of program activities, including curriculum. Critics of such amendments fear that the true motivation for the government's involvement in the regional studies centers is not national security needs, but rather fear of intellectual criticism of their own foreign policy. They fear a "Big Brother" in the universities. However, this criticism is misguided. First, the legislation is very particular in establishing that the board cannot mandate curriculum. It prompts the analysis that, perhaps, it is the academians who are more concerned with criticism of their classroom policy than the government is concerned with criticism of its foreign policy. Secondly, because the regional studies centers are federally funded, such an advisory board is justified. It is permissible to establish accountability at the centers because they use taxpayer money. Fortunately, there are private donors, like the Robertson's children who support the Woodrow Wilson School, who are civic minded enough to demand that their money be spent for the original purpose of these institutions: to develop intellectuals to serve the nation. For the federally funded universities of the regional studies centers, we must rely on innovative legislation. Olivia Albrecht is the John Tower National Security Fellow with the Center for Security Policy in Washington, D.C. Ms. Albrecht researches international relations and national security issues, with a focus on the 'Islamofascist' phenomenon. Albrecht previously worked for the Pentagon (Non-Proliferation Policy) and with the Heritage Foundation, and is a graduate of Princeton University with a degree in Philosophy. -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' _______________________________________________ Clips mailing list Clips(a)philodox.com http://www.philodox.com/mailman/listinfo/clips --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire'

1 0