- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Replcia watches to fit everyones style
by nicolasa mccroskey 27 Sep '08

27 Sep '08

*Be amazed ... the quality of our products is unbelievable! *Gimmick items appear identical to the genuine brand You can have the look of success at a fraction of the price Rolex, Cartier, Movado, and Breightling 15% off when purchasing multiple items. http://wwww.somethey.com/ Start Shopping At The Biggest Show-Case Online! nicolasa mccroskey

1 0

Low Cost Pharmacy Shipped overnight xsf xpla
by Kasandra Katherina 27 Sep '08

27 Sep '08

Order From Canadian pharmacy and Save Money *** We are running Hot specials *** Meds starts at only $51 - We have following: Cializ, ViagraProfessional, CialisSoftTabs, ViagraSoftTabs, GenericViagra Vprx Oil, Levitre, Casodex, Propecia, CialisProfessional, Acomplia Horny Goat Weed, Virility Patch, Pheromone Cologne For Men, Maxaman Pro-Erex, Spermamax, Flomax, Enhance9, Rockit247, ViagraOralJelly CialisJelly, Virility Pills - Price are 8O% cheaper than regular price - No doctor visits or hassles - All Countries shipping, quick delivery to your front door - We Accept Visa credit card http://gnwi.pxsides.cn

1 0

Very discrete shipping and billing
by Jamar Ewing 27 Sep '08

27 Sep '08

Size DOES matter - change your life today! Be the stud in 2008, and achieve all your dreams of super size! http://pactsans.com/

1 0

Privacy vs. Transparency, Anonymity vs. Identity (was Re: [gsc] Fwd: (micro)payments for anonymous routing in Tor?)
by R.A. Hettinga 27 Sep '08

27 Sep '08

On Sep 27, 2008, at 5:09 AM, George Hara wrote: > None of that guarantees that transactions are anonymous, as in digital > blinded cash anonymous. The point to bearer transactions is that you don't *need* identity to do the transaction. If the transaction doesn't complete the "nutty crypto" protocol (as you called it; yes, I know, Barbie, Crypto is Hard), the transaction *fails*, no harm, no foul. It doesn't even *execute*, much less clear or settle. Bearer transactions *can* be anonymous, and they're cheaper if you do them that way. Book entry transactions *must* be public, "transparent" these days, or they don't work, ultimately. Primarily to keep the system fair, pick your definition of "fair", but also to *force* the non-repudiation of a given transaction using guys with guns provided by your friendly neighborhood force monopoly. In other words, in a bearer transaction, identity/transparency costs money. In a book-entry transaction, anonymity/privacy costs money. I claim that in the geodesic economy that is currently emerging on the geodesic internetworks we've been building at least since the advent of the microprocessor, privacy will ultimately be cheaper than transparency, as an artifact of the cheapest technology we use in the execution, clearing, and settlement of our transactions. In the same way that *transparancy* has been an artifact of book-entry transactions, the cheapest way to do financial transactions since the advent of the Hollerith card, if not the telegraph. In a book entry transaction you *need* identity to execute, clear and settle the transaction, because the *way* you prevent repudiation of a bearer transaction is to send someone to *jail* if they lie about a debit or credit in a database somewhere. By definition, bearer transactions clear and settle instantaneously, or not at all. By definition, book-entry transactions execute, clear, and settle in at least twelve different book entries, all of them, by definition, happening at *different* times. [For each asset exchanged (at least two), there is both a debit and a credit (one each), for the buyer, the seller, and at least one, and usually two clearing/ settlement entities. Two assets times (two debit/credits times three entities) equals twelve database/accounting book-entries. It's usually *way* more than this, try charting a credit card transaction, or a stock exchange transaction sometime.] I think that as we get to t-zero in transaction execution/settlement/ clearing time, the *risk* of book-entries tends toward not merely the value of the transaction in question, but the value of *all* the assets that a given key controls. With digital bearer transactions, the *most* a given counterparty can lose is the value of a transaction, and not even that if the bearer certificate(s) used in that transaction are redeemed and reissued sometime at or near time of the transaction to prevent double spending. The more valuable the asset, the more it behooves you to redeem and reissue it to yourself, so valuable transactions happen on- line, and less valuable transactions happen quasi-offline with some kind of probabilistic settlement / assay method. As for guarantees that something on a public internetwork is anonymous, I leave that for other people. I can only say that with a bearer protocol, the transaction at least *can* be anonymous, instead of the way it is now, where all parties to a book-entry transaction *must* be identified. Cheers, RAH

1 0

Fwd: [gsc] Fwd: (micro)payments for anonymous routing in Tor?
by R.A. Hettinga 27 Sep '08

27 Sep '08

Begin forwarded message: > From: "George Hara" <georgegabrielhara(a)fastmail.fm> > Date: September 27, 2008 5:09:41 AM GMT-04:00 > To: gold-silver-crypto(a)rayservers.com > Subject: Re: [gsc] Fwd: (micro)payments for anonymous routing in Tor? > > RAH, > >>> None of these micro-mints use blinding, so what makes this "cash" >>> anonymous? What guarantees that transactions are not traced / linked >>> by >>> the mint? What makes any of these mints better than Loom or eCache? >> >> The mint's is the only signature. >> >> Remember, that on the internet, traffic analysis is a bitch anyway. >> So >> anonymity-wise, you get whatcha, heh, pay for. >> >> My claim is that passing coins is cheaper than keeping track of book- >> entries -- and sending people to jail when they lie about 'em. > > None of that guarantees that transactions are anonymous, as in digital > blinded cash anonymous. The mint can still create a trail of > transactions. Anyone who can get such data from the mint can send > one to > jail when they lie about them. And the more mints there are, the more > entities can (potentially) track transactions.

1 0

Only 200 $ for Watches > Rolex,Omega,Cartier,Chanel and Others vv7su
by Ashley Mitchell 27 Sep '08

27 Sep '08

Need Watch? Come and see. Rolex for only 200$ http://ijsunn.com

1 0

Wholesale Price pills from $38/pack, this is super Cheap wft j81c
by Rachell Aretha 26 Sep '08

26 Sep '08

Wholesale Price Pharmacy USA based Safe Fast F.D.A. Approved Medicines CailisFrom$42/pack ViagraFrom$37/pack & other 200 meds to choose from, please search on our site your needed meds Protected Delivery from a Licensed pharmacy! Fully confidential No Physical Exam No Embarassment No appointments Secure ordering Discreet & Overnight Shipping GUARANTEED LowestPrice http://kfg.eagox.cn

1 0

S4ve 80% on Brand name repl1ca w4tches
by cypherpunks＠jfet.org 26 Sep '08

26 Sep '08

Looking for a R0lex repl1ca? How about getting two, one for you and one for your spouse? When you get two R0lex w4tches this fall, we knock 15% off the price! Where? At http://www.jjrdjww.com/

1 0

T4g H3uer repl1cas better than originals
by cypherpunks＠al-qaeda.net 26 Sep '08

26 Sep '08

If you've waited to get your T4g H3uer repl1ca w4tch, this is the right time to go for it, because Prest1ge Repl1cas is offering wholesaler prices on all their repl1ca w4tches during the month of September. http://www.oirewz.com/

1 0

You Can Enlarge Your Penis By 3"
by Joan Womack 26 Sep '08

26 Sep '08

Impress the ladies with the new tool in your pants, and watch them moan in pleasure when you fill them up deeper and more tightly. Size DOES matter - change your life today! http://ruffsail.com/

1 0