- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: [ZS] Bitcoincard - a Vingean localizer?
by Lodewijk andri de la porte 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Upon more review of the website I'd say it's some solar panels (the thin, 10% efficiency type) some sort of e-paper like display (like on calculators, lack of product pictures makes it hard to say) and a flex-PCB with a radio segment, extremely small battery and microcontroller on it. It's a smartcard with energy efficient display, antenna, capacitor and solar panels. My guess is the radio distance will in practice never make the 300m and if it does it wouldn't for very long (think <1m bursts). I also don't think it'd last very long without sunlight (which is not widely available in my wallet). Then again I don't think it'll actually do that much. It'll basically be a nearly passive radio and run arduino like applications. On the subject of mesh networks, they can be done in a lightweight manner. They just can't be done right like that. If you'd run a generic mesh of this thing it won't be secure and robust IOW: won't be useful. I doubt it'd do consistent addressing in a true-p2p manner. It looks like it's intended more for burst bitcoin transaction flooding, nothing more. And flooding can be done without addressing so that's good. It also makes sense that they'd have "gateways" and that tracking would be helped so much. Fun but site is build to hype it up. (someone referenced Apple, very justified) It's a BITCOINcard, make no mistakes. I actually do think it's quite awesome for Bitcoin transactions, and the formfactor makes more sense. 2012/6/22 Lodewijk andri de la porte <l(a)odewijk.nl> > I'm currently working on something that'll do world-scale wireless mesh > networking, routing included, and I can confidently say that routing over > infinite amount of nodes is impossible, if only because one cannot address > an infinite amount of nodes directly. If you can only send to groups it > will not scale. > > True P2P is also very difficult, my technique uses central for speed and > falls back on smaller scale freely setup true p2p. It's also presently > impossible to prevent man in the middle attacks without either a large > amount of trouble (think web of trust) or a central authority (think > certificate authority). > > Let's hope my technique will still be relevant when I release the paper :) > -- -- Zero State mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/DoctrineZero ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

[i2p] weekly status notes [jun 21]
by jrandom 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi y'all, time to start back up our weekly status notes * Index 1) Dev[eloper] status 2) Dev[elopment] status 3) Unit test bounty 4) Service outage 5) ??? * 1) Dev[eloper] status After 4 cities in 4 countries, I'm finally getting settled and churning through code again. Last week I got the last of the pieces to a laptop together, I'm no longer couch hopping, and while I don't have net access at home, there are plenty of net cafes around, so access is reliable (just infrequent and expensive). That last point means that I won't be hanging out on irc as much as before, at least until the fall (I've got a sublet through August or so and will be looking for a place where I can get 24/7 net access). That doesn't, however, mean that I won't be doing as much - I'll just be working largely on my own test network, pushing out builds for live net testing (and, er, oh yeah, releases). It does mean though that we may want to move some discussions that used to go on free form in #i2p onto the list [1] and/or the forum [2] (I do still read the #i2p backlog though). I haven't found a reasonable place where I can go to for our development meetings yet, so I won't be there this week, but perhaps by next week I'll have found one. Anyway, enough about me. [1] http://dev.i2p.net/pipermail/i2p/ [2] http://forum.i2p.net/ * 2) Dev[elopment] status While I've been moving, there have been two main fronts that I've been working on - documentation and the SSU transport (the later only since I got the laptop). The docs are still in progress, with a big ol' scary overview one as well as a series of smaller implementation docs (covering things like source layout, component interaction, etc). SSU progress is going well - the new ACK bitfields are in place, the communication is dealing with (simulated) loss effectively, rates are appropriate for the various conditions, and I've cleared some of the uglier bugs I had run into previously. I am continuing to test these changes though, and once its appropriate we'll plot out a series of live net tests for which we'll need some volunteers to help out with. More news on that front when its available. * 3) Unit test bounty I'm glad to announce that Comwiz has come forward with a series of patches to claim the first phase of the unit test bounty [3]! We are still working through some minor details of the patches, but I've received the updates and generated both the junit and clover reports as necessary. I expect we'll have the patches in CVS shortly, at which point we'll put out Comwiz's testing docs. As clover is a commercial product (free for OSS developers [4]), only those who have installed clover and received their clover license will be able to generate the clover reports. In any case, we'll be publishing the clover reports on the web periodically, so those who don't have clover installed can still see how well our test suite is doing. [3] http://www.i2p.net/bounties_unittest [4] http://www.cenqua.com/clover/ * 4) Service outage As many have probably noticed, (at least) one of the outproxies is offline (squid.i2p), as is www.i2p, dev.i2p, cvs.i2p, and my blog. These are not unrelated events - the machine hosting them is hosed. I'm working on getting it back up though, at which point those five services will be back in operation. Just an FYI. * 5) ??? As there isn't a dev meeting on irc this week, if anyone else has anything to bring up, please feel free to post up to the list or the forum. I've been following the discussions on the list, the forum, and in #i2p while I've been away, and have been glad to be able to sit back and let other people answer most of the questions. I do appreciate the patience people have had with the slow down in releases as well, and realize that in some projects that would be cause for alarm. I2P is not, however, one of those projects - I've been working on it fulltime for more than two years now and will not stop until the needs that have been driving it are met. I am not wed to particular technologies for technologies sake, but merely follow what seems to be the best path from here to where we need to be, and as far as I can tell, we are still following the best path available. This summer, fall, and winter look to be a very exciting time in the anonymity field. =jr -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCuEcEWYfZ3rPnHH0RAvltAJ0fuhd/QRRqICtnqITeljKRw8cbbACeInKx gaRYTsDAU3zHBCxr4TiSl18= =uXj9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ i2p mailing list i2p(a)i2p.net http://i2p.dnsalias.net/mailman/listinfo/i2p ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

1 0

Re: [tor-talk] Tor banned in Pakistan.
by andrew＠torproject.org 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

On Thu, Sep 08, 2011 at 10:23:41PM +0100, pumpkin(a)cotse.net wrote 1.4K bytes in 42 lines about: : http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/aug/30/pakistan-bans-encryption-softwa… I talked to someone from the pakistani government about this encryption ban early this spring. They were concerned that this law would be far too broad and demolish whatever nascent e-commerce and online banking markets that had started in the country. They were also concerned that too many people in the government didn't understand the difference between a VPN and HTTPS. This person talked to American counter-terrorism people and found that actual terrorists were not using VPNs nor HTTPS at all. They stating right out in the open, from their registered DSL lines, their plans, where they lived, and what they were planning to do on various online chat network and forums. While technically, yes this law does make anything that uses encryption on the Internet in pakistan illegal, it was primarily aimed at the various VPN providers run by known criminal organizations. Tor, HTTPS Everywhere, and other tools are now illegal. Whether someone is actually prosecuted for using such tools in country remains to be seen. -- Andrew pgp key: 0x74ED336B _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Re: [liberationtech] How secure is Bluetooth?
by Martyn Williams 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Brian, > Again this is of course based on the assumption current technology cannot effectively monitor all 79 channels constantly for the duration of the call. However it also makes the assumption the data packets can be reconstructed into audio. Are you familiar with SDRs software defined radios? These are capable of monitoring a chunk of radio spectrum continuously. They're becoming very popular in amateur radio because they can monitor a band and visually indicate where the signals exist. I have one on my desk that works over 200kHz on frequencies up to 30MHz. The Bluetooth band is much higher in frequency and occupies 80MHz of spectrum. There's at least one SDR out there that can handle a 20MHz chunk of spectrum so, in theory, it could continuously monitor 1/4 of the Bluetooth band. Four radios (each a few thousand dollars) and some PCs and you might be able to monitor the whole band. You'd have to put the packets back together. I expect the difficulty of that depends on how noisy or quiet the Bluetooth spectrum is where the device is being used. If there isn't much traffic, it might be easy to match the packets together. Presumably the hopping works so that a transmission begins on one channel immediately after one ends on another. That might be enough to match them. You could also use the power level to help narrow down transmissions that might match each other. I have no idea if this would work in practice. Realtime would be more difficult than delayed processing. It's a potential method anyway. In reality it might be that the 2.4GHz band, which is also full of WiFi and other low power unlicensed radio stuff, is too noisy to do this easily. Even if you did get all the packets, you're still let with the encryption of the data. My point is, using SDRs it's possible to monitor a chuck of spectrum - not just one channel - continuously. Martyn -- Martyn Williams 2012 John S. Knight Journalism Fellow Stanford University Cell: 650-391-4868 @martyn_williams _______________________________________________ liberationtech mailing list liberationtech(a)lists.stanford.edu Should you need to change your subscription options, please go to: https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech If you would like to receive a daily digest, click "yes" (once you click above) next to "would you like to receive list mail batched in a daily digest?" You will need the user name and password you receive from the list moderator in monthly reminders. Should you need immediate assistance, please contact the list moderator. Please don't forget to follow us on http://twitter.com/#!/Liberationtech ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Re: [ZS] Bitcoincard - a Vingean localizer?
by Lodewijk andri de la porte 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Upon more review of the website I'd say it's some solar panels (the thin, 10% efficiency type) some sort of e-paper like display (like on calculators, lack of product pictures makes it hard to say) and a flex-PCB with a radio segment, extremely small battery and microcontroller on it. It's a smartcard with energy efficient display, antenna, capacitor and solar panels. My guess is the radio distance will in practice never make the 300m and if it does it wouldn't for very long (think <1m bursts). I also don't think it'd last very long without sunlight (which is not widely available in my wallet). Then again I don't think it'll actually do that much. It'll basically be a nearly passive radio and run arduino like applications. On the subject of mesh networks, they can be done in a lightweight manner. They just can't be done right like that. If you'd run a generic mesh of this thing it won't be secure and robust IOW: won't be useful. I doubt it'd do consistent addressing in a true-p2p manner. It looks like it's intended more for burst bitcoin transaction flooding, nothing more. And flooding can be done without addressing so that's good. It also makes sense that they'd have "gateways" and that tracking would be helped so much. Fun but site is build to hype it up. (someone referenced Apple, very justified) It's a BITCOINcard, make no mistakes. I actually do think it's quite awesome for Bitcoin transactions, and the formfactor makes more sense. 2012/6/22 Lodewijk andri de la porte <l(a)odewijk.nl> > I'm currently working on something that'll do world-scale wireless mesh > networking, routing included, and I can confidently say that routing over > infinite amount of nodes is impossible, if only because one cannot address > an infinite amount of nodes directly. If you can only send to groups it > will not scale. > > True P2P is also very difficult, my technique uses central for speed and > falls back on smaller scale freely setup true p2p. It's also presently > impossible to prevent man in the middle attacks without either a large > amount of trouble (think web of trust) or a central authority (think > certificate authority). > > Let's hope my technique will still be relevant when I release the paper :) > -- -- Zero State mailing list: http://groups.google.com/group/DoctrineZero ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

[libertarian-nation] First Seasteading Conference on October
by Patri Friedman 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

10th in Burlingame, CA! Hey all. If you're interested in helping work on a practical way to bring a libertarian nation into existence, consider coming to The Seasteading Institute's first annual conference. More information and registration here: http://movement.meetup.com/72/calendar/8606039/ Description: This is not a "sit around and listen to a few presenters" sort of conference. Instead, we're going to have a bunch of small workshops where groups brainstorm about solutions to some of the challenges we face, research those solutions, and come up w/ recommendations. If you are interested in particular topics, you can indicate that on your RSVP. Current topics we are considering: Business plan for seastead resort Marketing/PR: how to make our ideas sticky Transitions: How to provide an incremental path for people to transition from land to seastead life? Ephemerisle: Make it happen in 2009! Seastead design: What will the structure be and how does that impact other issues? Location: Where should the first seastead be located (or what's its migration path)? Transportation: How to get to/from (helicopters are slow, but planes are hard to land. boats are slow. What are our best options?) Government/Organization: What are good forms of seastead government for individual seasteads? How to organize multiple seasteads? International relations: trade, defense, international acceptation of seastead (and its currency and documents. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertarian-nation/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertarian-nation/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:libertarian-nation-digest@yahoogroups.com mailto:libertarian-nation-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: libertarian-nation-unsubscribe(a)yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

1 0

PET Award
by Alessandro Acquisti 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Dave - If you feel this Call for Nominations may be of interest to your list, can you please distribute? Thanks, -alessandro ************* CALL FOR NOMINATIONS - 2006 PET AWARD [Please forward and distribute] You are invited to submit nominations to the 2006 PET Award. The PET Award is presented annually to researchers who have made an outstanding contribution to the theory, design, implementation, or deployment of privacy enhancing technology. It is awarded at the annual Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET). The PET Award carries a prize of 3000 Euros thanks to the generous support of Microsoft. Any paper by any author written in the area of privacy enhancing technologies is eligible for nomination. However, the paper must have appeared in a refereed journal, conference, or workshop with published proceedings in the period that goes from the end of the penultimate PET Workshop (the PET workshop prior to the last PET workshop that has already occurred: i.e. June 2004) until April 15th, 2006. The complete Award rules including eligibility requirements can be found at http://petworkshop.org/award/. Anyone can nominate a paper by sending an email message containing the following to award-chairs06(a)petworkshop.org: - Paper title - Author(s) - Author(s) contact information - Publication venue - A nomination statement of no more than 250 words. All nominations must be submitted by April 15th, 2006. A seven-member Award committee will select one or two winners among the nominations received. Winners must be present at the PET workshop in order to receive the Award. This requirement can be waived only at the discretion of the PET Advisory board. 2006 Award Committee: - Alessandro Acquisti (chair), Carnegie Mellon University, USA - Roger Dingledine (co-chair), The Free Haven Project, USA - Ram Chellappa, Emory University, USA - Lorrie Cranor, Carnegie Mellon University, USA - Rosario Gennaro, IBM Research, USA - Ian Goldberg, Zero Knowledge Systems, Canada - Markus Jakobsson, Indiana University at Bloomington, USA More information about the PET award (including past winners) is available at http://petworkshop.org/award/. More information about the 2006 PET workshop is available at http://petworkshop.org/2006/. ----------------------- Alessandro Acquisti Heinz School, Carnegie Mellon University (P) 412 268 9853 (F) 412 268 5339 http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/~acquisti ----------------------- ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as eugen(a)leitl.org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

1 0

[IP] PET Award
by David Farber 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Begin forwarded message:

1 0

[libertarian-nation] First Seasteading Conference on October
by Patri Friedman 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

10th in Burlingame, CA! Hey all. If you're interested in helping work on a practical way to bring a libertarian nation into existence, consider coming to The Seasteading Institute's first annual conference. More information and registration here: http://movement.meetup.com/72/calendar/8606039/ Description: This is not a "sit around and listen to a few presenters" sort of conference. Instead, we're going to have a bunch of small workshops where groups brainstorm about solutions to some of the challenges we face, research those solutions, and come up w/ recommendations. If you are interested in particular topics, you can indicate that on your RSVP. Current topics we are considering: Business plan for seastead resort Marketing/PR: how to make our ideas sticky Transitions: How to provide an incremental path for people to transition from land to seastead life? Ephemerisle: Make it happen in 2009! Seastead design: What will the structure be and how does that impact other issues? Location: Where should the first seastead be located (or what's its migration path)? Transportation: How to get to/from (helicopters are slow, but planes are hard to land. boats are slow. What are our best options?) Government/Organization: What are good forms of seastead government for individual seasteads? How to organize multiple seasteads? International relations: trade, defense, international acceptation of seastead (and its currency and documents. ------------------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertarian-nation/ <*> Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional <*> To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/libertarian-nation/join (Yahoo! ID required) <*> To change settings via email: mailto:libertarian-nation-digest@yahoogroups.com mailto:libertarian-nation-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: libertarian-nation-unsubscribe(a)yahoogroups.com <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

1 0

PET Award
by Alessandro Acquisti 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Dave - If you feel this Call for Nominations may be of interest to your list, can you please distribute? Thanks, -alessandro ************* CALL FOR NOMINATIONS - 2006 PET AWARD [Please forward and distribute] You are invited to submit nominations to the 2006 PET Award. The PET Award is presented annually to researchers who have made an outstanding contribution to the theory, design, implementation, or deployment of privacy enhancing technology. It is awarded at the annual Privacy Enhancing Technologies Workshop (PET). The PET Award carries a prize of 3000 Euros thanks to the generous support of Microsoft. Any paper by any author written in the area of privacy enhancing technologies is eligible for nomination. However, the paper must have appeared in a refereed journal, conference, or workshop with published proceedings in the period that goes from the end of the penultimate PET Workshop (the PET workshop prior to the last PET workshop that has already occurred: i.e. June 2004) until April 15th, 2006. The complete Award rules including eligibility requirements can be found at http://petworkshop.org/award/. Anyone can nominate a paper by sending an email message containing the following to award-chairs06(a)petworkshop.org: - Paper title - Author(s) - Author(s) contact information - Publication venue - A nomination statement of no more than 250 words. All nominations must be submitted by April 15th, 2006. A seven-member Award committee will select one or two winners among the nominations received. Winners must be present at the PET workshop in order to receive the Award. This requirement can be waived only at the discretion of the PET Advisory board. 2006 Award Committee: - Alessandro Acquisti (chair), Carnegie Mellon University, USA - Roger Dingledine (co-chair), The Free Haven Project, USA - Ram Chellappa, Emory University, USA - Lorrie Cranor, Carnegie Mellon University, USA - Rosario Gennaro, IBM Research, USA - Ian Goldberg, Zero Knowledge Systems, Canada - Markus Jakobsson, Indiana University at Bloomington, USA More information about the PET award (including past winners) is available at http://petworkshop.org/award/. More information about the 2006 PET workshop is available at http://petworkshop.org/2006/. ----------------------- Alessandro Acquisti Heinz School, Carnegie Mellon University (P) 412 268 9853 (F) 412 268 5339 http://www.heinz.cmu.edu/~acquisti ----------------------- ------------------------------------- You are subscribed as eugen(a)leitl.org To manage your subscription, go to http://v2.listbox.com/member/?listname=ip Archives at: http://www.interesting-people.org/archives/interesting-people/ ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature which had a name of signature.asc]

1 0