- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Как можно уйти от НДС без последствий.
by Недобросовестные контрагенты 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

12- Oкtяbря 2009 Практические рекомендации как отвечать налоговой инспекции в случае проверки недобросовестных контрагентов и как можно уйти от НДС без последствий (495) 792-двадцать один-двадцать два (495) 742.9I 98 Цель обучения: Семинар даст слушателям ответ на то, как правильно заключать договоры и что делать, если он ошибся, но при этом хотел бы сохранить свои налоговые обязательства без изменений. Слушатели будут точно знать что и как отвечать налоговой инспекции в случае проверки таких контрагентов. Поймут как можно уйти от НДС без последствий. Практика свидетельствует, что практически все проверки налогоплательщиков применяющих ОСН затрагивают данный вопрос с негативными для налогоплательщика последствиями. При этом налоговый орган исключает из состава затрат НП и вычетов по НДС суммы по контрагентам, которые, например, просто не отвечают на запрос в рамках встречных проверок, либо не заплатили налоги и т.п. Подчас очень тяжело отстоять свою правоту в спорах с налоговым органом. Семинар посвящен вопросу защиты налогоплательщика, призван помочь ему как не погрязнуть в тотальных проверках своих контрагентов, так и в последствии защитить свои права по взаимоотношениям я такими компаниями. На семинаре не только будут показаны способы противодействия придиркам налоговой, но и будут разобраны способы заключения договоров, которые в принципе исключают возможность признания лица недобросовестным, а также законные способы снижение налоговой нагрузки по НДС в том случае, если налогоплательщик в этом заинтересован. Программа мероприятия: 1.Методические указания Минфина о назначении выездных налоговых проверок. 2.Методические указания Минфина по поиску недобросовестных контрагентов. 3.Основания признания налоговой выгоды необоснованной (на основании судебной практики, писем Минфина, практики проверок). 4.Что необходимо сделать, чтобы проявить разумную осмотрительность. Какие документы и какую информацию о контрагенте необходимо собрать. 5.Как защититься от претензий налогового органа о том, что контрагент: -не платит налоги и не сдает отчетность; -не отвечает на встречные проверки; -не находиться по месту регистрации, либо зарегистрирован по адресу массовой регистрации; -директор БОМЖ, ничего не подписывал, его подпись подделали и т.п. -директор является "массовым", в отношении руководителя проводятся розыскные мероприятия; -проведенный осмотр показал, что компания не могла отгрузить товар с адреса, указанного в накладной, счете-фактуре; -коды ОКВЭД контрагента не позволяют ему произвести действия, которые он якобы произвел по отношению к налогоплательщику (не может выполнять работы, поставлять товар и т.п, так как создан для иных целей); -иные претензии. 6.Способ ухода от признания налоговой выгоды необоснованной при заключении договоров с поставщиками при помощи посредника. Как построить договор, чтобы претензии по поставщикам нельзя было предъявить. 7.Уход от признания налоговой выгоды необоснованной путем особого способа заключения договоров. 8.Уход от уплаты НДС с наценки путем: -заключения договора с дополнительной выгодой; -заключение договора с предварительной куплей-продажей опциона; -включение условий о неустойки. 9.Кто отвечает за работу с недобросовестными контрагентами (директор или бухгалтер) и в какой части. 10.Потеря документов по недобросовестным поставщикам. Налоговые последствия. Указания Минфина по привлечению к ответственности в таком случае. Способ защиты от налоговых претензий. Является ли потеря документов защитой от претензий правоохранительных органов. Cтоимоcть: 7900 руб. Вся информация по тел: [495) 792*--21 22__(495) 742 9I 98 2MDZAYC7G

1 0

World-Class CheapWatches: vRolex, Audemars Piguet, Tag Heuer, Officine Panerai, 0ver 1500 styles, Fast worldwide shipping bzlk d3t
by Jena Malia 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

Rep1icaWatch Store Limited Edition Grade 1 High Quality Rep1icaWatch! Rep1icaRo1exWatch! Rep1icaWatch at the lowest price! Every rep1icaWatch 100% exactly like the original! Top QualityRolexRep1ica! Well known luxury watch brands - A. Lange & Sohne, Alain Silberstein, Audemars Piguet, Blancpain, Breitling, Bulgari, Cartier, Chanel, Corum, Dolce & Gabbana, Franck Muller, Giannie Versace, Glashutte, IWC, Luis Vuitton, Montblanc, Officine Panerai, Omega, Patek Philippe, Paul Picot, Rado, Roger Dubuis, Rolex, TAG Heuer, Vacheron Constantin Click here to view all models http://btokzoon.cn 473174194209889 835789460345482

1 0

More money in this recession time.
by Gerry Lobel 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

We will get your self a verifiable degree of: Masters, Bachelors and PhD Give us a call now. 1-213-403-0133 Leave your msg, with your full name and number and we will get back to you shortly.

1 0

With our medicine you will wake up healthy the next morning.
by Raymundo Camp 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

WebMD - Sex & Relationships Newsletter Saturday, August 22, 2009 In This Issue: • Some Birth Control Pills Are Safer Than Others • 8 Reasons to Slow Down • Need Help With Questions About Lubrication Natural Remediesfor Erectile Dysfunction Men have traveled the world in search of performance boosters. Here's whatscience reveals about ones that work. Also See: • Understanding HPV and Cancer • Get Help With Sexual Abuse • Can't Orgasm? Tips for Women Health News & Features Some Birth Control Pills Are Safer Than Others When it comes to the risk of blood clots, some oral contraceptivepills are safer than others. Also See: • Long Live the Optimists! • Overworking Affects Spouses Differently 8 Reasons to Slow Down It's a face-paced world. Here are eight reasons to slow things downwhen dining, hanging out, and having sex. Also See: • Can Someone With Bipolar Be a Good Mother? • Finally Stop Fighting More From WebMD: • See 15 'Unkissable' Mouth Problems • Here's How to Avoid Ugly Warts • Best Way to Wash Your Face Members Are Talking Need Help With Questions About Lubrication This member's wife is experiencing vaginal dryness. They want to use alubricant without killing the mood. Read more on the Sexual Issues message board. From Our Sponsors "Of Course I Was Inquisitive..." When it came time to change therapies for his rheumatoid arthritis, Jay wanted to know how the new treatment would be different. Talking to his doctor helped answer his questions. Watch Jay & Dr. Mease Discuss RA Treatment Options Preparing for Baby? What Every Mom Should Know After your baby is born, there are only a few precious moments when the stem cell-rich umbilical cord blood can be collected and saved. Stem cells have been used to treat nearly 70 serious conditions, and emerging research shows promise in treating heart disease, spinal injury and more. Hear from parents and health care professions about why they chose to bank their baby's cord blood. Visit the Cord Blood Banking Education Center Depression Has Many Faces For some people, depression is a matter of feeling sad, restless, or having trouble concentrating or making decisions. For others, fatigue, aches, pains, and other physical problems are part of their depression, too. Learn about a medication that may treat a broad range of symptoms. Newsletter ManagementDon't miss an issue of this newsletter. Add WebMD to your email's safe sender list -- get instructions here. You are subscribed as cypherpunks. View and manage your WebMD newsletter preferences. Subscribe to more newsletters. Change/update your email address. To unsubscribe from this Sex & Relationships newsletter, send a blank email to http://www.google.com/reader/item/tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/e942453b4…. To unsubscribe from ALL WebMD newsletters, send a blank email to http://www.google.com/reader/item/tag:google.com,2005:reader/item/e942453b4…. WebMD Privacy Policy WebMD Office of Privacy 1175 Peachtree Street, Suite 2400, Atlanta, GA 30361 © 2009 WebMD, LLC. All rights reserved. WebMD Shortcuts Sexual Conditions Center Member Support Group News Center Boards & Blogs Home Page

1 0

Dr. Strangelove alive and well
by Eugen Leitl 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

http://www.wired.com/politics/security/magazine/17-10/mf_deadhand?currentPa… WIRED MAGAZINE: 17.10 Politics : Security RSS Inside the Apocalyptic Soviet Doomsday Machine By Nicholas Thompson Email 17 hours ago The technical name was Perimeter, but some called it Mertvaya Ruka, Dead Hand. Illustration: Ryan Kelly Valery Yarynich glances nervously over his shoulder. Clad in a brown leather jacket, the 72-year-old former Soviet colonel is hunkered in the back of the dimly lit Iron Gate restaurant in Washington, DC. It's March 2009bthe Berlin Wall came down two decades agobbut the lean and fit Yarynich is as jumpy as an informant dodging the KGB. He begins to whisper, quietly but firmly. "The Perimeter system is very, very nice," he says. "We remove unique responsibility from high politicians and the military." He looks around again. Yarynich is talking about Russia's doomsday machine. That's right, an actual doomsday deviceba real, functioning version of the ultimate weapon, always presumed to exist only as a fantasy of apocalypse-obsessed science fiction writers and paranoid C<ber-hawks. The thing that historian Lewis Mumford called "the central symbol of this scientifically organized nightmare of mass extermination." Turns out Yarynich, a 30-year veteran of the Soviet Strategic Rocket Forces and Soviet General Staff, helped build one. Chart source: Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Natural Resources Defense Council The point of the system, he explains, was to guarantee an automatic Soviet response to an American nuclear strike. Even if the US crippled the USSR with a surprise attack, the Soviets could still hit back. It wouldn't matter if the US blew up the Kremlin, took out the defense ministry, severed the communications network, and killed everyone with stars on their shoulders. Ground-based sensors would detect that a devastating blow had been struck and a counterattack would be launched. The technical name was Perimeter, but some called it Mertvaya Ruka, or Dead Hand. It was built 25 years ago and remained a closely guarded secret. With the demise of the USSR, word of the system did leak out, but few people seemed to notice. In fact, though Yarynich and a former Minuteman launch officer named Bruce Blair have been writing about Perimeter since 1993 in numerous books and newspaper articles, its existence has not penetrated the public mind or the corridors of power. The Russians still won't discuss it, and Americans at the highest levelsbincluding former top officials at the State Department and White Housebsay they've never heard of it. When I recently told former CIA director James Woolsey that the USSR had built a doomsday device, his eyes grew cold. "I hope to God the Soviets were more sensible than that." They weren't. The system remains so shrouded that Yarynich worries his continued openness puts him in danger. He might have a point: One Soviet official who spoke with Americans about the system died in a mysterious fall down a staircase. But Yarynich takes the risk. He believes the world needs to know about Dead Hand. Because, after all, it is still in place. The system that Yarynich helped build came online in 1985, after some of the most dangerous years of the Cold War. Throughout the '70s, the USSR had steadily narrowed the long US lead in nuclear firepower. At the same time, post-Vietnam, recession-era America seemed weak and confused. Then in strode Ronald Reagan, promising that the days of retreat were over. It was morning in America, he said, and twilight in the Soviet Union. Part of the new president's hard-line approach was to make the Soviets believe that the US was unafraid of nuclear war. Many of his advisers had long advocated modeling and actively planning for nuclear combat. These were the progeny of Herman Kahn, author of On Thermonuclear War and Thinking About the Unthinkable. They believed that the side with the largest arsenal and an expressed readiness to use it would gain leverage during every crisis. You either launch first or convince the enemy that you can strike back even if you're dead. Illustration: Ryan Kelly The new administration began expanding the US nuclear arsenal and priming the silos. And it backed up the bombs with bluster. In his 1981 Senate confirmation hearings, Eugene Rostow, incoming head of the Arms Control and Disarmament Agency, signaled that the US just might be crazy enough to use its weapons, declaring that Japan "not only survived but flourished after the nuclear attack" of 1945. Speaking of a possible US-Soviet exchange, he said, "Some estimates predict that there would be 10 million casualties on one side and 100 million on another. But that is not the whole of the population." Meanwhile, in ways both small and large, US behavior toward the Soviets took on a harsher edge. Soviet ambassador Anatoly Dobrynin lost his reserved parking pass at the State Department. US troops swooped into tiny Grenada to defeat communism in Operation Urgent Fury. US naval exercises pushed ever closer to Soviet waters. The strategy worked. Moscow soon believed the new US leadership really was ready to fight a nuclear war. But the Soviets also became convinced that the US was now willing to start a nuclear war. "The policy of the Reagan administration has to be seen as adventurous and serving the goal of world domination," Soviet marshal Nikolai Ogarkov told a gathering of the Warsaw Pact chiefs of staff in September 1982. "In 1941, too, there were many among us who warned against war and many who did not believe a war was coming," Ogarkov said, referring to the German invasion of his country. "Thus, the situation is not only very serious but also very dangerous." A few months later, Reagan made one of the most provocative moves of the Cold War. He announced that the US was going to develop a shield of lasers and nuclear weapons in space to defend against Soviet warheads. He called it missile defense; critics mocked it as "Star Wars." To Moscow it was the Death Starband it confirmed that the US was planning an attack. It would be impossible for the system to stop thousands of incoming Soviet missiles at once, so missile defense made sense only as a way of mopping up after an initial US strike. The US would first fire its thousands of weapons at Soviet cities and missile silos. Some Soviet weapons would survive for a retaliatory launch, but Reagan's shield could block many of those. Thus, Star Wars would nullify the long-standing doctrine of mutually assured destruction, the principle that neither side would ever start a nuclear war since neither could survive a counterattack. As we know now, Reagan was not planning a first strike. According to his private diaries and personal letters, he genuinely believed he was bringing about lasting peace. (He once told Gorbachev he might be a reincarnation of the human who invented the first shield.) The system, Reagan insisted, was purely defensive. But as the Soviets knew, if the Americans were mobilizing for attack, that's exactly what you'd expect them to say. And according to Cold War logic, if you think the other side is about to launch, you should do one of two things: Either launch first or convince the enemy that you can strike back even if you're dead. Perimeter ensures the ability to strike back, but it's no hair-trigger device. It was designed to lie semi-dormant until switched on by a high official in a crisis. Then it would begin monitoring a network of seismic, radiation, and air pressure sensors for signs of nuclear explosions. Before launching any retaliatory strike, the system had to check off four if/then propositions: If it was turned on, then it would try to determine that a nuclear weapon had hit Soviet soil. If it seemed that one had, the system would check to see if any communication links to the war room of the Soviet General Staff remained. If they did, and if some amount of timeblikely ranging from 15 minutes to an hourbpassed without further indications of attack, the machine would assume officials were still living who could order the counterattack and shut down. But if the line to the General Staff went dead, then Perimeter would infer that apocalypse had arrived. It would immediately transfer launch authority to whoever was manning the system at that moment deep inside a protected bunkerbbypassing layers and layers of normal command authority. At that point, the ability to destroy the world would fall to whoever was on duty: maybe a high minister sent in during the crisis, maybe a 25-year-old junior officer fresh out of military academy. And if that person decided to press the button ... If/then. If/then. If/then. If/then. Once initiated, the counterattack would be controlled by so-called command missiles. Hidden in hardened silos designed s When: 1960s What: Midway through the Cold War, American leaders began to worry that a rogue US officer might launch a small, unauthorized strike, prompting massive retaliation. So in 1962, Robert McNamara ordered every nuclear weapon locked with numerical codes. Effect: None. Irritated by the restriction, Strategic Air Command set all the codes to strings of zeros. The Defense Department didn't learn of the subterfuge until 1977. US-Soviet Hotline When: 1963 What: The USSR and US set up a direct line, reserved for emergencies. The goal was to prevent miscommunication about nuclear launches. Effect: Unclear. To many it was a safeguard. But one Defense official in the 1970s hypothesized that the Soviet leader could authorize a small strike and then call to blame the launch on a renegade, saying, "But if you promise not to respond, I will order an absolute lockdown immediately." Missile Defense When: 1983 What: President Reagan proposed a system of nuclear weapons and lasers in space to shoot down enemy missiles. He considered it a tool for peace and promised to share the technology. Effect: Destabilizing. The Soviets believed the true purpose of the "Star Wars" system was to back up a US first strike. The technology couldn't stop a massive Soviet launch, they figured, but it might thwart a weakened Soviet response. Airborne Command Post When: 1961-1990 What: The USSR and US set up a direct line, reserved for emergencies. The goal was to prevent miscommunication about nuclear launches. Effect: Stabilizing. Known as Looking Glass, it was the American equivalent of Perimeter, guaranteeing that the US could launch a counterattack. And the US told the Soviets all about it, ensuring that it served as a deterrent. The first mention of a doomsday machine, according to P. D. Smith, author of Doomsday Men, was on an NBC radio broadcast in February 1950, when the atomic scientist Leo Szilard described a hypothetical system of hydrogen bombs that could cover the world in radioactive dust and end all human life. "Who would want to kill everybody on earth?" he asat the same time, Armageddon might have ensued. Perimeter solved that problem. If Soviet radar picked up an ominous but ambiguous signal, the leaders could turn on Perimeter and wait. If it turned out to be geese, they could relax and Perimeter would stand down. Confirming actual detonations on Soviet soil is far easier than confirming distant launches. "That is why we have the system," Yarynich says. "To avoid a tragic mistake. " The mistake that both Yarynich and his counterpart in the United States, Bruce Blair, want to avoid now is silence. It's long past time for the world to come to grips with Perimeter, they argue. The system may no longer be a central element of Russian strategybUS-based Russian arms expert Pavel Podvig calls it now "just another cog in the machine"bbut Dead Hand is still armed. To Blair, who today runs a think tank in Washington called the World Security Institute, such dismissals are unacceptable. Though neither he nor anyone in the US has up-to-the-minute information on Perimeter, he sees the Russians' refusal to retire it as yet another example of the insufficient reduction of forces on both sides. There is no reason, he says, to have thousands of armed missiles on something close to hair-trigger alert. Despite how far the world has come, there's still plenty of opportunity for colossal mistakes. When I talked to him recently, he spoke both in sorrow and in anger: "The Cold War is over. But we act the same way that we used to." Yarynich, likewise, is committed to the principle that knowledge about nuclear command and control means safety. But he also believes that Perimeter can still serve a useful purpose. Yes, it was designed as a self-deterrent, and it filled that role well during the hottest days of the Cold War. But, he wonders, couldn't it now also play the traditional role of a doomsday device? Couldn't it deter future enemies if publicized? The waters of international conflict never stay calm for long. A recent case in point was the heated exchange between the Bush administration and Russian pr over Georgia. "It's nonsense not to talk about Perimeter," Yarynich says. If the existence of the device isn't made public, he adds, "we have more risk in future crises. And crisis is inevitable." As Yarynich describes Perimeter with pride, I challenge him with the classic critique of such systems: What if they fail? What if something goes wrong? What if a computer virus, earthquake, reactor meltdown, and power outage conspire to convince the system that war has begun? Yarynich sips his beer and dismisses my concerns. Even given an unthinkable series of accidents, he reminds me, there would still be at least one human hand to prevent Perimeter from ending the world. Prior to 1985, he says, the Soviets designed several automatic systems that could launch counterattacks without any human involvement whatsoever. But all these devices were rejected by the high command. Perimeter, he points out, was never a truly autonomous doomsday device. "If there are explosions and all communications are broken," he says, "then the people in this facility canbI would like to underline canblaunch." Yes, I agree, a human could decide in the end not to press the button. But that person is a soldier, isolated in an underground bunker, surrounded by evidence that the enemy has just destroyed his homeland and everyone he knows. Sensors have gone off; timers are ticking. There's a checklist, and soldiers are trained to follow checklists. Wouldn't any officer just launch? I ask Yarynich what he would do if he were alone in the bunker. He shakes his head. "I cannot say if I would push the button." It might not actually be a button, he then explains. It could now be some kind of a key or other secure form of switch. He's not absolutely sure. After all, he says, Dead Hand is continuously being upgraded. Senior editor Nicholas Thompson (nicholas_thompson(a)wired.com) is the author of The Hawk and the Dove: Paul Nitze, George Kennan, and the History of the Cold War.

1 0

Новое в законе о несостоятельности (банкротстве).
by Новое в законе о банкротстве 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

С начала 2009 г. в ФЗ "О несостоятельности (банкротстве)" 4-мя законами внесены изменения, причем последним ФЗ ╧73 от 28 апреля 2009 г (вступил в силу 5 июня) внесены самые значительные изменения. Ответственность собственника и руководителя по долгам компании: новеллы законодательства о банкротстве. Как уйти от ответственности Dваdцatь воcьmoго cеntябrя   (Ч95) 7Ч2-91-98, 445..ЧО..девять пять   Обучение посвящено анализу нововведений и разъяснению таких вопросов как: 1. Как собственнику и директору защититься от возможных претензий по долгам компании. 2. Как построить структуру управления и собственности, чтобы претензий можно было избежать. Что даст оффшор и т.п. 3. Каким образом заключать сделки, чтобы их затруднительно было оспорить Как объяснить почему сделки заключались на невыгодных условиях. 4. На каком основании налоговый орган сможет предъявить претензии, что для этого необходимо. 5. Как кредиторам воспользоваться изменениями в законе чтобы в полной мере взыскать свои долги. Программа: Основания признания должника несостоятельным (банкротом). Основания для обязательного добровольного обращения в суд. Презумпция вины и неплатежеспособности, введенные Федеральным законом от 28 апреля 2009 г. N 73-ФЗ. Ответственность директора Гражданско-правовая ответственность (субсидиарная ответственность по долгам организации и т.п.), уголовная ответственность, административная ответственность. Ответственность директора при отсутствии документов. Обоснование распространения обязанности ведения бухучета на все компании, вне зависимости от указаний в законе о бухучете. Ответственность директора компании применяющей УСН. Обоснование ухода от ответственности в данном случае. Ответственность контролирующих должника лиц (собственников организаций владеющих более 50 % долей/акций, иных лиц которые могли давать обязательные для должника указания).   Способы ухода директора от ответственности. Как обосновать отсутствие вины директора при заключении договоров. Типичные легенды, позволяющие объяснить заключение договоров на невыгодных для должника условиях. Способы заключение договоров, исключающие претензии кредиторов/суда. Как проявить разумную осмотрительность при выборе контрагента как условие отсутствия вины директора. Как уйти от обвинения в умысле при заключении сделки с компанией заведомо не исполняющей налоговые обязательства.   Способы ухода контролирующего должника лица от ответственности: владение компанией через нерезидента в том числе оффшор. владение компанией через доверенных лиц (порядок оформления отношений, риски); формирование полномочий директора и исключение ответственности собственников посредством изменения уставных документов и др. Сокрытие структуры собственности с помощью оффшора/нерезидента. Трасты (на примере Кипра): понятие, механизмы контроля за действиями трастового управляющего; процедура принудительного раскрытия информации о бенефициаре, проблемы вывода имущества и оспаривания сделок и др.   Порядок взыскания долгов кредиторов с директора/контролирующих лиц организации должника. Специальные условия оспаривания сделок по основаниям, предусмотренные ФЗ "О несостоятельности (банкротстве). Круг сделок, которые могут оспариваться. Проблемы оспаривания сделок на основании пунктов 2 и 3 статьи 103 ФЗ "О несостоятельности (банкротстве)" др.   Квалификация и установление размера требований по обязательным платежам. Ответственность за правонарушения. Когда, по каким требованиям и на основании каких документов налоговый орган имеет право предъявить требования о банкротстве и др.   Стоимость участия в семинаре 7 900 руб.   Информацию можно получить по телефонам: (Моск. код) 742/9/1/9/8 или ЧЧ5_Ч0_95

1 0

Elegant watches for people from economy class.
by Hershel Sexton 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

These fantastic replica watches are even better in life than they are in pictures because besides the great look and sophisticated elegance you get to enjoy undeniable quality.   Break in http://rodeuter.cn

1 0

SOLDOUT - We selling ROLE><ES and other \/\/atche for only 200$ 52
by Kenneth Doyle 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

1 0

Lose that flabby tummy today
by Imelda Bouchard 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

1 0

Вас посадят! если только?
by серая конвертация 22 Sep '09

22 Sep '09

Dваdцatь пятoго cеntябrя (495) 742 9I 98,(495) ЧЧ5-ЧО/95 Максимум выживаемости без фирм-однодневок как правильно себя чувствовать без обналички 1.Что такое "черные" , "серые" и "белые" схемы, обналичка, фирма-однодневка ("помойка" , "недобросовестный" или "проблемный" налогоплательщик, "фонарь" и т.п.). Как выявить внешнего контрагента-однодневку и исключить отношения с ним. 2.Обналичивание. Для чего используется: "черная" зарплата и доходы собственников бизнеса; оплата расходов, которые не хочется проводить официально; незаконная деятельность (взятки, откаты, финансирование политической деятельности; Законные альтернативы (только для законных целей!: зарплата и дивиденды на спецрежимах, выплата процентов, компенсаций, аренда, покупка у физлиц ТМЦ, ИП на ЕНВД или УСН (в т.ч. на патенте) √ как использовать; дарение физлицом наличных денег, заработанных в качестве ИП √ легальная альтернатива обналичиванию, дающая безналоговый доход? Текущая ситуация с обложением таких доходов НДФЛ. Получение наличных по чеку на расходы ИП, через личные (карточные) счета, по сделкам с другими ИП, занимающимися розницей, общепитом, услугами населению и т.п.; зарплата в большом размере √ регрессия по ЕСН; платежи от нерезидентов на карты, основания. Аутстафинг от нерезидента; перевод расходов в безналичную форму. Представительские расходы. 3.Однодневки. Для чего используются: псевдооптимизация НДС и налога на прибыль в отдельных сделках или всей деятельности; "серый импорт" ; "серая конвертация" ; незаконная деятельность. Законные альтернативы однодневкам (только для законных целей!: затратные механизмы или трансфертное ценообразование с участием низконалоговых субъектов; выявление (создание) покупателей (заказчиков), не нуждающихся в вычете НДС, разделение финансовых потоков "с НДС" и "без НДС" ; простое товарищество с участием субъектов УСН и/или нерезидентов, работа по агентским или комиссионным договорам с ними; прямой импорт с использованием или не использованием трансфертных цен и затратных механизмов; выплата нерезидентам дивидендов, роялти, процентов вклады в их уставные капиталы, покупка акций, инвестиции и т.п 4.Расчет налоговой нагрузки на примере. Каковы будут (и будут ли) потери при отказе от "черных" схем. Когда при этом можно даже сэкономить. Стоимость участия в семинаре 7 900 рублей По вопpоcам подробной информации и pегucтаpацuu обpащайтеcь по тел: (495) 742-9l-98; 4Ч5-ЧO-95 G4HTQ97QX4

1 0