- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: Bitcoin P2P e-cash paper
by John Levine 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

> As long as honest nodes control the most CPU power on the network, > they can generate the longest chain and outpace any attackers. But they don't. Bad guys routinely control zombie farms of 100,000 machines or more. People I know who run a blacklist of spam sending zombies tell me they often see a million new zombies a day. This is the same reason that hashcash can't work on today's Internet -- the good guys have vastly less computational firepower than the bad guys. I also have my doubts about other issues, but this one is the killer. R's, John --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo(a)metzdowd.com ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Outlaw Biology Symposium and Faire, UCLA, Jan 29-30, Call for Ideas
by Christopher Kelty 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Dear DIYers: UCLA's Center for Society and Genetics (http://socgen.ucla.edu) is organizing a symposium (Jan. 29-30, 2010) which I've given the tentative title of "Outlaw Biology" ("when e. coli is outlawed, only outlaws will have e. coli" etc.). The symposium's confirmed participants are: Meredith Patterson (hacker, writer, maker of yogurt and other technologies), Roger Brent (Fred Hutchison Cancer Center, Seattle), Gaymon Bennett (SynBERC, UC Berkeley), Paul Rothemund (maker of DNA Origami, CalTech), Hugh Rienhoff (Mydaughtersdna.org) and Jason Bobe (DIYBio, Church Lab, Harvard). Victorian Vesna, bioartist and faculty member of of UCLA's Digital Arts and Media dept. will likely participate and I will moderate. I'm excited about that lineup, and will send more details to the list as things settle. What I'm most excited about though is the hackfest/biofaire planned for the saturday after the symposium (Jan 30). It will be held on UCLA's campus and open to anyone. Jason has agreed to bring bioweathermaps (and make use of the Arboretum on campus, rich source of diversity that it is), Paul has agreed to do some aspect of DNA synthesis, either the design part of the visualization part, and Meredith has agreed to do something as yet unspecified (but awesome). So I'm writing to open this up to the list and invite participation from anyone who wants to come, do a demonstration, a teach-in, a DIY happening, etc. There are no official funds to bring people here or fund these things, unfortunately, but depending on what people might want to do, there is the possibility of finding in-kind support on campus (e.g. equipment or materials). Obviously it will be easiest for people in SoCal to come to this, but I'd love it if others were able to make it as well. If you think you'd like to be part of this, and have an idea for what to do, please send a brief abstract to me (or to the list if you want to recruit others). I'm open to anything, but I don't yet know how much space we will have, or how many people we can accomodate. ck --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group. To post to this group, send email to diybio(a)googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox For Cloud Services
by Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Hi! I'm a developer on the Tahoe-LAFS project. On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Josef Spillner <2005(a)kuarepoti-dju.net> wrote: > > A conceptual difference is that Tahoe is targeting homogeneous storage networks, where access to the servers is assumed because they also need to run Tahoe software, whereas NubiSave goes to great lengths (e.g. by contributing new FUSE modules to fuse.sf.net) to be able to talk to existing online storage providers despite their (often found) inability or unwillingness to be talked to in a uniform way. > > A second conceptual difference is that Tahoe is more of a (static) RAIC and NubiSave more of a (dynamic) RAOC, where means that security can be traded for cost or proximity can be traded for signup privacy. This mechanism relies on formal provider descriptions. I don't understand this, and can't say whether I think these two differences correctly apply to Tahoe-LAFS or not. > A practical difference is that Tahoe looks like a genuine engineering project, so it is available for more platforms, has better testing, and certainly an existing user base. Thank you! We certainly work hard at making it reliable and secure. We're also open to accepting patches that make Tahoe-LAFS better for your use-case, as long as it doesn't complicate or destabilize the use-cases of others. Also, I love the idea of the FreedomBox and would like to see it become useful to a large number of people. The basic idea of serving storage from a FreedomBox doesn't sound incompatible with Tahoe-LAFS architecture to me. One thing that I would be careful of is not to try to use adhoc storage servers whose only qualification is "they managed to turn it on and run the software". This sort of principle of inclusion works great for transfer, e.g. Bittorrent, but not for storage. Unqualified nodes are too numerous and too unreliable to be any use for storage. They do more damage than good. I speak from long and hard experience, having been an architect of several successive notable failed projects, each of which attempted to take advantage of unqualified, random nodes to provide storage. But, FreedomBox storage servers do not have to be adhoc, unqualified storage servers. Anything which serves to filter out most of the 99% of bad servers would do. Possible ways to filter which storage servers you'll upload your ciphertext to: 1. The storage client has to manually add the storage server ID to a list of storage servers that she is willing to entrust ciphertext to. (This is basically what Tahoe-LAFS already offers, although it is currently mediated by a centralized thing called the "introducer".) 2. The storage server has to be blessed by some trusted authority before the storage clients will use it. (Again, the current introducer could sort of be pressed into service for this, but we're actively working on upgrading that to a more decentralized, flexible, and secure solution.) 3. The storage server has to have some aggregate "good reputation" among some collection of users. 4. The storage server is owned by someone in your social network. :-) I like this idea. When you befriend someone, that automatically grants them a certain amount of storage space on your FreedomBox. 6. The storage server has to demonstrate 30 consecutive days of better than 95% uptime before the storage client will entrust storage to it. 7. The storage server has to give a micropayment, let's say one dollar or one Bitcoin, to the client before the client will start using it. Then, the client will start paying the server for service. Within a few weeks or months the server will have earned back its dollar plus more. But, the initial requirement of a payment in the wrong direction serves to filter out most of the 99% of servers that are completely useless. I just came up with this crazy notion just now. I would encourage people interested in hacking on FreedomBox to try installing Tahoe-LAFS on it and give it a spin. There's nothing like practical, hands-on experience to inform your ideas. However, while you're waiting for it to run its extensive and time-consuming unit tests, you could also browse some hifalutin ideas: https://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2011-February/006150.html http://lists.zooko.com/pipermail/p2p-hackers/2011-February/002906.html http://lists.zooko.com/pipermail/p2p-hackers/2011-August/002979.html http://lists.zooko.com/pipermail/p2p-hackers/2011-August/002986.html Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss(a)lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

[tor-talk] LivelyBlog Encourages Tor Users To Blog With Special Setup
by ming＠tormail.org 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Lively blog[1], a free blogging service, offers a special configuration[2] for Tor users. It's the first free blogging service on the open web I've discovered which encourages Tor users to join and blog anonymously. (unlike the .onion sites which require Tor in order to access and usually experience poor up time and longevity) [1] http://livelyblog.com [2] http://livelyblog.com/tor-users/ _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

News update about Libertarian Futurist Society conference
by Mikegrossb＠aol.com 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: Jan. 28, 2001 Libertarian Futurist Society announces first national conference (Reply to mikegrossb(a)aol.com) The Libertarian Futurist Society will celebrate its 20th anniversary by sponsoring its first national conference May 25-27 at Marcon 36 at the Hyatt Regency hotel and Columbus Convention Center in Columbus, Ohio. LFScon will be a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to hear Prometheus Award winners and LFS leaders explore the future of freedom and the potential of libertarian science fiction to shape a more rational, diverse, tolerant and optimistic vision of what is possible in the 21st and coming centuries. The Libertarian Futurist Society will present its 2001 Prometheus Hall of Fame awards ceremony before an audience of more than 1,500 people during the intermission of Marcon's Saturday night masquerade-- its most popular event. LFScon will feature more Prometheus Awardwinning novelists than any other sf convention or libertarian conference in history. So far, the LFS has confirmed eight Prometheus Awardwinners, who collectively have won 11 Best Novel awards and five Hall of Fame awards: special LFScon Guest of Honor L. Neil Smith (The Probability Broach, Pallas), Poul Anderson (Trader to the Stars, The Stars are Also Fire, The Star Fox), F. Paul Wilson (Healer, Wheels within Wheels, An Enemy of the State), James Hogan (Voyage From Yesteryear, The Multiplex Man), Vernor Vinge (Marooned in Realtime, A Deepness in the Sky), J. Neil Schulman (Alongside Night, The Rainbow Cadenza), Brad Linaweaver (Moon of Ice) and Victor Milan (The Cybernetic Samurai.) Marcon and LFScon are jointly planning a major LFScon program track, with a dozen major panels on libertarian themes, including: * Heinlein's Children: The Libertarian Writers of Science Fiction. with a full panel of our Prometheus Awardwinners; * Will the Future Be More or Less Free? * Who Wants to Be a Zillionaire in Space?- A Free Market Approach to Exploring, Industrializing and Colonizing the Solar System * Intelligent Self-Defense, the 2nd Amendment and the Hi-Tech Weaponry of the Future * The Internet & the First Amendment Electronic Frontiers * Illuminati! -- Conspiracies, Real and Imagined * Cloning & Artificial intelligence: The Freedom Issues * Freedom Filk: A Filk (sf folksinging) Concert in Honor of Liberty, with filking pioneer Karen Anderson, Poul Anderson's wife. As Ohio's oldest and largest sf/fantasy convention, Marcon annually attracts more than 3,000 people (3,400 last year), including authors, artists, editors, scientists, costumers, gamers and fans from more than 30 states and Canada. There's something for everyone, including autographing sessions (with all Prometheus Awardwinners); author readings; dances; parties (including an LFS Friday night bash in a Hyatt Hotel suite); art show & auction; charity auction; panel discussions on separate program tracks about literature, science, animation, art, children's programming and more; and a large dealer's room (with 120 tables, including a large Libertarian Futurist Society exhibit/book-sale.) Besides freedom, Marcon's other 2001 program themes will be intelligence (in honor of 2001: A Space Odyssey's and "2001" guest star Gary Lockwood) and heroic fantasy (in honor of Marcon fantasy guest Robert Jordan.) Other featured Marcon/LFScon guests include Babylon 5's actor Peter Woodward, libertarian sf authors Steven Burgauer ("The Grandfather Paradox,The Last American) and Joseph Martino (author of "Science Funding: Politics & Porkbarrel" and "Analog" short stories); First Amendment/Internet advocate Matt Gaylor; and LFS leaders Victoria Varga, Amy Rule, Chris Hibbert and Lynn Maners. Deadline is March 10 for advance-discount LFScon/Marcon registrations--with a special offer of $75/person for non-members, including a trial-year Basic LFS membership, and $60/person for new LFS members's guests. Mail your name, address, email, phone number and guest names along with your check (make checks to Libertarian Futurist Society) to LFScon, c/o R.W. Coffin, 3164 Plymouth Place, Columbus OH 43213. For more information, explore the website at www.lfs.org, email mikegrossb(a)aol.com, or call 614-236-5040. ************************************************************************** Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: freematt(a)coil.com with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per month) Matthew Gaylor, 2175 Bayfield Drive, Columbus, OH 43229 (614) 313-5722 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/ **************************************************************************

1 0

FC: FBI gets cash to spend on anti-encryption, broadband snooping
by Declan McCullagh 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

http://www.wired.com/news/print/0,1294,45632,00.html According to the report accompanying a spending bill that's awaiting a floor vote in the Senate: * The FBI will receive an extra $7 million for technology to thwart encryption. The appropriations committee intends for it to be spent on: "(1) analysis/exploitation of systems to allow access to data pre-encryption, (2) recognition/decryption of data hidden in plain sight, and (3) decryption of encrypted data." * Another $7 million goes to a plan to improve "intercept capabilities." The fed-speak for this is "developing broadband capabilities, and procuring prototypes capable of intercepting transmissions outside of the FBI's technical reach." Translation: Create better ways to eavesdrop on cable modems and DSL connections. * Antitrust enforcement gets a boost. The division, best known recently for its dogged pursuit of Microsoft, receives $3.6 million extra, but $10 million less than the Bush administration requested. The committee predicts a slew of mergers because of "the collapse of high technology stocks, and the resultant downward pressure on all stock prices." * Las Vegas, St. Louis, Charleston and Kansas City will split $6 million earmarked for gun surveillance technology. The plan is to spend it on acoustic sensors scattered around downtown areas so the location of a gunshot can be triangulated and located. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice. To subscribe, visit http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

Re: [Freedombox-discuss] Freedombox For Cloud Services
by Zooko Wilcox-O'Hearn 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Hi! I'm a developer on the Tahoe-LAFS project. On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 3:57 AM, Josef Spillner <2005(a)kuarepoti-dju.net> wrote: > > A conceptual difference is that Tahoe is targeting homogeneous storage networks, where access to the servers is assumed because they also need to run Tahoe software, whereas NubiSave goes to great lengths (e.g. by contributing new FUSE modules to fuse.sf.net) to be able to talk to existing online storage providers despite their (often found) inability or unwillingness to be talked to in a uniform way. > > A second conceptual difference is that Tahoe is more of a (static) RAIC and NubiSave more of a (dynamic) RAOC, where means that security can be traded for cost or proximity can be traded for signup privacy. This mechanism relies on formal provider descriptions. I don't understand this, and can't say whether I think these two differences correctly apply to Tahoe-LAFS or not. > A practical difference is that Tahoe looks like a genuine engineering project, so it is available for more platforms, has better testing, and certainly an existing user base. Thank you! We certainly work hard at making it reliable and secure. We're also open to accepting patches that make Tahoe-LAFS better for your use-case, as long as it doesn't complicate or destabilize the use-cases of others. Also, I love the idea of the FreedomBox and would like to see it become useful to a large number of people. The basic idea of serving storage from a FreedomBox doesn't sound incompatible with Tahoe-LAFS architecture to me. One thing that I would be careful of is not to try to use adhoc storage servers whose only qualification is "they managed to turn it on and run the software". This sort of principle of inclusion works great for transfer, e.g. Bittorrent, but not for storage. Unqualified nodes are too numerous and too unreliable to be any use for storage. They do more damage than good. I speak from long and hard experience, having been an architect of several successive notable failed projects, each of which attempted to take advantage of unqualified, random nodes to provide storage. But, FreedomBox storage servers do not have to be adhoc, unqualified storage servers. Anything which serves to filter out most of the 99% of bad servers would do. Possible ways to filter which storage servers you'll upload your ciphertext to: 1. The storage client has to manually add the storage server ID to a list of storage servers that she is willing to entrust ciphertext to. (This is basically what Tahoe-LAFS already offers, although it is currently mediated by a centralized thing called the "introducer".) 2. The storage server has to be blessed by some trusted authority before the storage clients will use it. (Again, the current introducer could sort of be pressed into service for this, but we're actively working on upgrading that to a more decentralized, flexible, and secure solution.) 3. The storage server has to have some aggregate "good reputation" among some collection of users. 4. The storage server is owned by someone in your social network. :-) I like this idea. When you befriend someone, that automatically grants them a certain amount of storage space on your FreedomBox. 6. The storage server has to demonstrate 30 consecutive days of better than 95% uptime before the storage client will entrust storage to it. 7. The storage server has to give a micropayment, let's say one dollar or one Bitcoin, to the client before the client will start using it. Then, the client will start paying the server for service. Within a few weeks or months the server will have earned back its dollar plus more. But, the initial requirement of a payment in the wrong direction serves to filter out most of the 99% of servers that are completely useless. I just came up with this crazy notion just now. I would encourage people interested in hacking on FreedomBox to try installing Tahoe-LAFS on it and give it a spin. There's nothing like practical, hands-on experience to inform your ideas. However, while you're waiting for it to run its extensive and time-consuming unit tests, you could also browse some hifalutin ideas: https://tahoe-lafs.org/pipermail/tahoe-dev/2011-February/006150.html http://lists.zooko.com/pipermail/p2p-hackers/2011-February/002906.html http://lists.zooko.com/pipermail/p2p-hackers/2011-August/002979.html http://lists.zooko.com/pipermail/p2p-hackers/2011-August/002986.html Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ Freedombox-discuss mailing list Freedombox-discuss(a)lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/freedombox-discuss ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

[tor-talk] LivelyBlog Encourages Tor Users To Blog With Special Setup
by ming＠tormail.org 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Lively blog[1], a free blogging service, offers a special configuration[2] for Tor users. It's the first free blogging service on the open web I've discovered which encourages Tor users to join and blog anonymously. (unlike the .onion sites which require Tor in order to access and usually experience poor up time and longevity) [1] http://livelyblog.com [2] http://livelyblog.com/tor-users/ _______________________________________________ tor-talk mailing list tor-talk(a)lists.torproject.org https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-talk ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

Re: [liberationtech] Can HAM radio be used for communication between health workers in rural areas with no cell connectivity?
by flane＠pgm.com 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Thanks to Ali-Reza for reposting Dr. Dey's reply. If you are looking for lowest-cost short to medium range communications using ham radio, Android phones are not the answer. You still need VHF or UHF radio hardware. There are at least 20 radio manufacturers in China that make small variations on a common design of VHF transceiver, that can be bought for less than USD 50 each (often much less). Radio repeaters can be built using these same transceivers. There is also a huge surplus of transceivers in the US that have been made obsolete by the FCC's narrow band mandate, that you can buy for a few dollars, particularly interesting for higher power mobile radios. Shipping will be your major expense there unless you are able to do a freight container full at once. The biggest problem in most countries is almost always getting legal permission to use amateur radio for other public purposes. Solve that problem for your group, and find out what frequencies and power levels are permissible, and the technical issues are much easier. -- Too many emails? Unsubscribe, change to digest, or change password by emailing moderator at companys(a)stanford.edu or changing your settings at https://mailman.stanford.edu/mailman/listinfo/liberationtech ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

EDRi-gram newsletter - Number 7.15, 29 July 2009
by EDRI-gram newsletter 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

============================================================ EDRi-gram biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe Number 7.15, 29 July 2009 ============================================================ Contents ============================================================ 1. Hadopi 2's final vote is postponed till 15 September 2. EU wants to share more bank details with the US authorities 3. EC hearing on Google book deal 4. UK ISP gave up direct disconnection of file-sharers for a three strikes 5. Finnish CSS case application lodged in the European Court of Human Rights 6. EDPS: New privacy issues in relation to intelligent transport systems 7. France: CNIL's opinion on LOPPSI draft law 8. Russian Copyright law will apply to news reports 9. Recommended Action 10. Recommended Reading 11. Agenda 12. About ============================================================ 1. Hadopi 2's final vote is postponed till 15 September ============================================================ The French deputies had only a few days before the summer vacation to debate the new text of the three strikes law (called Hadopi 2) that was adopted by the Senate on 8 July 2009. As the opposition introduced a very large number of amendments, a vote for the entire text was not possible and the National Assembly President's decision was to postpone the vote until September. The Assembly had 894 amendments to discuss but the text was not basically modified, but rather adjusted. One of the good decisions was that the surveillance of electronic communications will not be possible so e-mails were excluded from the investigation field. The access to the Internet will be cut off only in case of recurrent alleged illegal file-sharing or in case the Internet connection was not secured after a first warning from Hadopi authority. The deputies also approved the penal ordinance procedure meaning that the alleged illegal downloader can be sanctioned in his (her) absence, according to a rapid procedure, by a sole judge. The user in case could be given a fine but can also ask for a classical procedure. The text is different from the one voted by the Senate which means that a Mixted Paritary Commission will be needed in order to find a compromise between the two versions. Anyway, the text still ignores the presumption of innocence which is contradicting the Constitution, as previousely ruled by the Constitutional Council. The amendment regarding the two euro "creative contribution" to the Internet subscription in order to finance the creators was again rejected but during a meeting with the socialists, the new Minister of Culture Fridiric Mitterrand, while stating that he supported the Government position on Hadopi, also admitted that the draft law was not solving the issue of the financing of culture. And as the opposition has already promised to appeal again to the Constitutional Council in case the draft law is voted by the National Assembly, the text might also have to pass the constitutionality test as well. Analyse note of the draft law on criminal protection of the literary and artistic property on the Internet (only in French, 19.07.2009) http://www.laquadrature.net/files/LaQuadratureduNet_20090719_NoteHADOPI2AN.… French Anti-Piracy Sanctions Delayed (23.07.2009) http://www.billboard.biz/bbbiz/content_display/industry/e3i04ac5aa7296d367c… Hadopi 2: the deputies voted all the articles (only in French, 24.07.2009) http://www.01net.com/editorial/504691/hadopi-2-les-deputes-ont-vote-tous-le… Hadopi 2: the deputies' vote pushed till September (only in French, 21.07.2009) http://www.01net.com/editorial/504438/hadopi-2-le-vote-des-deputes-repousse… Hadopi 2: the deputies discharge cutting off messaging (only in French, 23.07.2009) http://www.01net.com/editorial/504470/hadopi-2-les-deputes-ecartent-la-coup… Hadopi 2, last debate day before the Parliamentary vacation (only in French, 23.07.2009) http://www.silicon.fr/fr/news/2009/07/23/hadopi_2__dernier_jour_de_debat_av… EDRIgram: Hadopi 2 adopted very fast by the French Senate (15.07.2009) http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.14/3-strikes-second-senate ============================================================ 2. EU wants to share more bank details with the US authorities ============================================================ The dispute between EU and the US on access to the bank transfer details has come again to the public attention after the Belgium company SWIFT (Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication) that intermediates the international banking transactions has decided to open a new server in Switzerland that will focus on European customers. SWIFT has now two servers in the Netherlands and in the state of Virginia, with identical data. After 11 September 2001, US intelligence services had gained access to the system, including to European inner-transactions. This became public in 2006 and led to a data protection outcry. In 2007, a first agreement was reached between the US and the EU to establish what set of SWIFT data can be accessed by US authorities and under what circumstances. The European Commission also appointed the French judge Jean-Louis Bruguihre to examine if the US really use the data only for the anti-terrorism fight. The report, that has never been made public, was presented to the European Parliament on 17 February 2009 and concluded that the data was deleted when no longer necessary and that the US authorities fully respect the agreement with the EU. But Bruguihre, the Vice-President of the Tribunal de Grande Instance in Paris, has in the past 25 years gained a reputation as France's "leading terrorist hunter", so the outcome of the report was predictable. SWIFT will open a new server in Switzerland for inner-European transactions in September, which would exclude US authorities from accessing these. While this would have eased a lot of the criticism from data protection commissioners and the European Parliament, the European Commission is now drafting a new agreement with the US authorities before the new server starts operations. This met heavy cricism from MEPs, as the European Parliament would again be sidelined by this. MEPs as well as national-level politicians alsocriticized the plan on substantial grounds, citing fundamental privacy concerns. The chairman of the Austrian social democrats in the EP said: "the EU is not a colony of the US". Some MEPs have already questioned the re-election of Commission president Manuel Barroso. Because of the upcoming federal elections and the rising worries about surveillance among the German population, vocal criticism came especially from German politicians, including many Greens, the chairman of the Liberal Party, the conservative Bavarian head of government Horst Seehofer, and others. EU justice commissioner Jacques Barrot denied these accusations in a meeting on 23 July with the members of the newly formed European Parliamentary Committee on civil liberties, justice and home affairs. He also concluded that he wants in fact a better deal: "We must negotiate an agreement based on reciprocity rather than allowing the US to continue as they have up until now as if they were top dog." According to a Commission spokesperson, the deal will not include EU access to US banking transactions, though. Jaques Barrot confirmed that the Commission wants to re-negotiate this agreement after one year. By then, the Lisbon Treaty, which would give European Parliament a much more important role in this field, is expected to be in force. But an interim agreement was needed to be rapidly concluded in order not to stop the anti-terrorism fight. The Council of Foreign Ministers gave a green light on 27 July to the project, by unanimously agreeing to allow the Swedish Presidency to negotiate a temporary agreement with the US regarding access to data held by SWIFT. According to news reports, the mandate includes that the data would be given to US authorities on a per-request basis and could be stored in the US for five years. Apparently, the EU bodies want to built their own system of banking surveillance, that might include the SEPA (Single Euro Payment Area) transaction system. This may be done in connection with the proposed "Stockholm Programme", the EU's justice and home affairs work plan for 2010 to 2014. The draft already stipulates: "The instruments for combating the financing of terrorism must be adapted to the new potential vulnerabilities of the financial system and to the new payment methods used by terrorists. We must have a mechanism that allows both adequate monitoring of financial flows and effective and transparent identification of people and groups likely to finance terrorism. " Brussels wants to nullify protection of banking data (only in German, 20.07.2009) http://www.zeit.de/online/2009/30/bankdaten-eu-swift EU looking for better deal on data transfer (23.07.2009) http://euobserver.com/9/28486 EU still wants to give financial data to US intelligence services (only in German, 28.07.2009) http://netzpolitik.org/2009/eu-will-weiter-finanzdaten-an-die-us-geheimdien… EU-US data sharing causes uproar in Germany (28.07.2009) http://www.euractiv.com/en/justice/eu-us-data-sharing-causes-uproar-germany… EU supports more anti-terror data sharing with US (28.07.2009) http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h8BBdlIgQeLl2Hs7Dha2LN_05… EU Review of the United States' "Terrorist Finance Tracking Programme" confirms privacy safeguards (17.02.2009) http://europa.eu/rapid/pressReleasesAction.do?reference=IP/09/264&format=HT… Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council: An area of freedom, security and justice serving the citizen (known as the "Stockholm Programme", 10.6.2009) http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52009DC0262:EN:… EDRi-gram: Terrorist Finance Tracking Program raises privacy questions (5.06.2006) http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number4.13/swift ============================================================ 3. EC hearing on Google book deal ============================================================ The European Commission (EC) will hold a hearing on 7 September 2009 to evaluate Google's proposed deal with U.S. publishers and authors granting Google the right to digitize and publish out of print copyrighted books and its possible impact upon copyright issues. Spokesman Oliver Drewes said EU officials wanted to get the opinion of European publishers, authors and consumers in order to be able to "draw provisional conclusions on the Google Inc.'s book-scanning settlement." The EU launched a formal inquiry in the matter after the German delegation, supported by UK and France, submitted an information note in May 2009, asking for action against Google's online library project. In the US, Google reached an agreement in October 2008 with the Authors Guild and the Association of American publishers in which Google accepted to pay about 88 million euro to create a Book Rights Registry, where authors and publishers can register works. Google would get rights in return for a share of any revenues collected by selling access to online books. The agreement is criticized for giving Google preferential rights especially in case of the "orphan works" (books for which the copyright owners cannot be identified). The regulators might also tackle the issue of the "most-favoured nation" clause guaranteeing Google terms that are at least as good as those offered to other Internet companies in future. Google executives argue that the company will have no unfair advantages while providing increased access to books. In support of their cause, the company will probably bring as argument Viviane Reding's position who, earlier this month, stated that EU needed to urgently standardize its copyright laws to encourage book digitization. Another argument that might be in Google's favour is that this is the only initiative to scan millions of books and make them available on the Internet. Also, Google's leading lawyer David Drummond said that Google would be open to changing the terms of the deal if it received a "compelling argument" from regulators. The U.S. Justice Department is also looking now into this settlement. EU sets hearing over Google books deal (20.07.2009) http://www.reuters.com/article/internetNews/idUSTRE56J3JX20090720 Google book deal faces growing scrutiny (11.07.2009) http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/81bf17c0-5557-11de-b5d4-00144feabdc0.html EU seeks opinions on Google Books (20.07.2009) http://news.cnet.com/8301-1023_3-10290954-93.html?FORM=ZZNR4 EU asks publishers for feedback on Google Books (20.07.2009) http://finance.yahoo.com/news/EU-asks-publishers-for-apf-3599301835.html/pr… EDRi-gram: EU will examine Google Books project (3.06.2009) http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.11/google-books-ec ============================================================ 4. UK ISP gave up direct disconnection of file-sharers for a three strikes ============================================================ UK ISP Karoo belonging to Hull based KCom telecom company, announced on 24 July it would change its policy and apply a three-strikes system for the customers allegedly infringing copyright. Within the agreement with the entertainment industries, the UK ISPs have agreed to send out warning letters to users suspected of downloading copyrighted material from the Internet. Karoo, holding the monopoly in Hull as the only ISP in area, has been exceeded this procedure for some time now, having directly disconnected its users for suspected file-sharing. In order to get their service restored, customers had to sign a document admitting their guilt and promising not to repeat the offence. Therefore, the method not only ignored the presumption of innocence but actually blackmailed users by obliging them to admit guilt in order to be reconnected. Following the exposure of the company's policy by BBC which made public the case of a customer having been disconnected and asked to fill in a form admitting her guilt in order to be reconnected, Karoo decided to adopt a three-strikes rule in which suspected file-sharers will receive three written warnings before action is taken. The major issue is that Karoo takes its actions without any court decision, based only on accusations made by anti-piracy organizations which use evidence gathering methods that are far from being accurate or reliable. Although rights holders have stated that their data was never wrong, a report made last year by the University of Washington, Department of Computer Science and Engineering has clearly shown the vulnerabilities of the methods. "Whether a false positive sent to a user that has never even used BitTorrent or a truly infringing user that relies on incomplete IP blacklists, there is currently no way for anyone to wholly avoid the risk of complaints.(...) We have further demonstrated that IP blacklists, a standard method for avoiding systematic monitoring, are wholly ineffective given current identification techniques and provide only limited coverage of likely monitoring agents" says the report. Therefore, as the report and reality have shown, there is a large risk that innocent people are accused of illegal file-sharing. Plug-pulling ISP changes policy (24.07.2009) http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8166640.stm Kang-Karoo courts: guilt by accusation, punishment without trial (24.07.2009) http://www.openrightsgroup.org/2009/07/kang-karoo-courts-guilt-by-accusatio… Karoo backs down and adopts 'three strikes' policy for illegal p2p file sharers instead of immediate cut off (24.07.2009) http://www.thinkbroadband.com/news/4013-karoo-backs-down-and-adopts-three-s… UK ISP Cuts Off Alleged Pirates (24.07.2009) http://torrentfreak.com/uk-isp-cuts-off-alleged-pirates-090724/ Challenges and Directions for Monitoring P2P File Sharing Networks ,or, Why My Printer Received a DMCA Takedown Notice" (1.06.2008) http://dmca.cs.washington.edu/uwcse_dmca_tr.pdf ============================================================ 5. Finnish CSS case application lodged in the European Court of Human Rights ========================================================== Finnish Activist Mikko Rauhala has lodged an application to the European Court of Human Rights versus the Finnish state, regarding his right to freedom of expression. The appeal is a follow up to the lengthy court process against Mr. Rauhala in Finland. The process started when Mr. Rauhala started a discussion board on the Internet, on which people could talk about the DVD copy protection method Content Scrambling System (CSS). Mr. Rauhala's motivation for this act was to criticize the implementation of the EU Copyright Directive in Finland which came into force in 2006. According to the implementation of the directive, "organized discussion" regarding circumventing technological protection measures, like the CSS, was prohibited. Mr. Rauhala's motivation was to display the disbeneficial nature of the directive. Thus, he himself reported his actions to the Finnish police in the first place, thinking that the police would not investigate the issue or that the public prosecutor would not press charges. However the Police started its investigation with the public prosecutor who was supported strongly by the Finnish Anti-Piracy Association which arranged the "expert" testimonies for the prosecutor. Soon thereafter, the case was referred to the Helsinki District Court which decided in Rauhala's favor; that CSS was not a type of protection measure covered by the Directive and therefore the ban did not apply. The district attorney appealed to the Helsinki Appellate Court, which stated that Mr. Rauhala was guilty of illegally circumventing a technological protection measure and of providing an illegal service for the circumvention of protection measures. The Supreme Court of Finland denied Mr. Rauhala's application. Mr. Rauhala had no other choice than to make an application to the European Court of Human Rights, because in all the court instances his argument that the discussion he was administering was within the confines of the Right to Freedom of Speech, as enshrined in the Finnish Constitution, was not considered. Mr. Rauhala is represented by the Helsinki, Finland based law firm Turre Legal. EDRi-gram: Finish CSS decision overturned (4.06.2008) http://www.edri.org/edrigram/number6.11/finish-css-overturned (contribution by Markku Rdsdnen - Summer Associate, Turre Legal, Finland) ============================================================ 6. EDPS: New privacy issues in relation to intelligent transport systems ============================================================ Peter Hustinx, the European Data Protection Supervisor (EDPS), issued on 22 July his opinion on the European Commission's proposed plan, adopted in December 2008, to accelerate and coordinate the deployment of intelligent transport systems (ITS) in road transportation in Europe, and their connection with other modes of transport . The deployment includes an Action Plan establishing priority areas for action and a Directive proposal laying down the framework for their implementation. Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS) are applications using Information and Communication Technologies embedded in different modes of transport that interact between them (such as GPS systems), meant to make transport safer and cleaner and to reduce traffic congestion. ITS applications and services are based on the collection, processing and exchange of a large range of data and allow for the tracking of a vehicle and the collection of personal data such as driving habits. As such, they raise several privacy and data protection issues. "The problem is not what the data tells the state, but what happens with interlocking information it already has. If you correlate car tracking data with mobile phone data, which can also track people, there is the potential for an almost infallible surveillance system," said Simon Davies, director of the watchdog Privacy International. While welcoming the fact that the proposed ITS deployment plan aims at harmonising the data processes throughout Europe, the EDPS however warned that the proposed plan raised a series of issued related to privacy and data protection. Hustinx believes there is a lack of clarity of the proposed legal framework that might create diversity in the implementation of ITS in Europe thus leading to different levels of data protection in Europe. "The EDPS emphasizes the need for further harmonisation on these issues at EU level to clarify outstanding issues (such as definition of the roles and responsibilities of ITS actors, which specific ITS applications and systems must be embedded in vehicles, the development of harmonised contracts for the provision of ITS services, the specific purposes and modalities of use of ITS etc)." One important aspect in his opinion is that data controllers must be clearly identified "as they will bear the responsibility to ensure that privacy and data protection considerations are implemented at all levels of the chain of processing." Also, the data controllers providing ITS services should implement appropriate safeguards "so that the use of location technologies is not intrusive from a privacy viewpoint. This should notably require further clarification as to the specific circumstances in which a vehicle will be tracked, strictly limiting the use of location devices to what is necessary for that purpose and ensuring that location data are not disclosed to unauthorized recipients". The interconnection of the systems and applications must also be done "with due respect for data protection principles and practical safeguards on security," and personal data must be processed only if necessary "for the specific purpose for which ITS is used and pursuant to an appropriate legal basis". The EDPS emphasizes the importance of not using the processed personal data "for further purposes that are incompatible with those for which they were collected" and he recommends the introduction of an explicit reference to the notion of ''privacy by design'' for ITS applications and systems saying that data "may not be used for purposes other than the ones for which they were collected in a way incompatible with those purposes." The EDPS recommends that privacy and data protection should be considered during the early design stages of any ITS. "Privacy and security requirements should be incorporated within standards, best practices, technical specifications and systems." His final recommendation is that data protection authorities, such as Article 29 Working Party and the EDPS should be closely involved in all the initiatives related to the deployment of ITS "through consultation at a sufficiently early stage before the development of relevant measures." European Data Protection Supervisor Opinion on the Communication from the Commission on an Action Plan for the Deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in Europe and the accompanying Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the framework for the deployment of Intelligent Transport Systems in the field of road transport and for interfaces with other transport modes (22.07.2009) http://www.edps.europa.eu/EDPSWEB/webdav/site/mySite/shared/Documents/Consu… Big Brother is watching: surveillance box to track drivers is backed (31.03.2009) http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/mar/31/surveillance-transport-communicati… Intelligent transport raises privacy concerns (23.07.2009) http://www.euractiv.com/en/infosociety/intelligent-transport-raises-privacy… ============================================================ 7. France: CNIL's opinion on LOPPSI draft law ============================================================ The French Data Protection Authority (CNIL) has now made public its opinion of 16 April 2009 on seven articles belonging to LOPPSI, the French draft law on orientation and programming for the performance of the domestic security that may give the police the possibility to spy on electronic communications and which introduces Internet filtering by administrative decision. The draft law was presented on 27 May by Minister of Justice Michhle Alliot-Marie to the French Council of Ministers but it's only now that CNIL can make its opinion public due to new legal provisions introduced in May. The Minister did not choose to take CNIL's opinion into consideration. In its opinion, CNIL was expressing fears related to several provisions of the draft, especially in relation to the collection and retention of data, installation of Trojan horses on computers as well as the surveillance of public access to the Internet. CNIL considered that such instruments should be installed and used by "guaranteeing the proportionality of the surveillance measure with the targeted objectives" and warned on problems that might be caused to professional users dealing with sensitive data such as lawyers, politicians, medical staff, or journalists. The opinion also stated that the legislator was the one who had to "provide conciliation between, on the one hand, preventing disturbances to the public order and finding infringers, both necessary for the preservation of the rights and constitutional principles and, on the other hand, the exercising of constitutionally guaranteed freedoms amongst which there are the freedom to come and go and the respect of private life, protected by articles 2 and 4 of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and the Citizen of 1789, as well as the individual freedom, that article 66 of the Constitution places under surveillance of the legal authority." In the meantime, the digital rights campaigners continue to fight laws such as LOPPSI or Hadopi. Thus, ODEBI league, an Internet users association, launched on 20 July a "numerical army" meant to fight the lack of information or disinformation in the presentation of projects with a final objective to protect the rights of Internet users. CNIL's opinion on LOPPSI draft law made public (only in French, 25.07.2009) http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13563-L-avis-de-la-CNIL-sur-le-projet-de-l… Deliberation n02009-200 of 16 April 2009 bearing the opinion on seven articles of the draft law on orientation and programming for the performance of the domestic security (only in French, 16.04.2009) http://www.cnil.fr/en-savoir-plus/deliberations/deliberation/delib/207/ ODEBI league launches a "numerical army" project (only in French, 20.07.2009) http://www.numerama.com/magazine/13492-La-Ligue-ODEBI-lance-un-projet-d-arm… EDRI-gram: The French Government wants to spy on electronic communications (3.06.2009) http://www.edri.org/edri-gram/number7.11/france-law-on-spying ============================================================ 8. Russian copyright law will apply to news reports ============================================================ A new modification in the Russian copyright legislation was drafted by the Government in order to extend the protection to news reports. The new draft was pushed by the biggest Russian news agencies which were claiming that other regional and online publications are plagiarizing their news reports. The law could be submitted to the Russian Parliament in the fall. The draft presented by the Communications and Press Deputy Minister Alexander Zharov foresees fines from 10 to 20 000 rubles (approx. 230-460 euros), but also the confiscation of the production as sanctions for plagiarism for an agency. The plagiating reporter of the agency could also be fined with 1 - 5 000 rubles (23 - 115 euros). The present draft is still unclear on how the fines will be applied and under what specific circumstances the confiscation will be enforced, thus causing critics to say that the new law could be used to shut up the unwanted voices. Andrei Richter, head of Moscow's Media Law and Policy Institute, considered the law a step forward and commented: "Currently, news agencies have to go to court and prove that they have suffered financial losses because of the plagiarism." But other news editors, such as Moscow Post editor Alexei Kozlov were not too happy. He called the bill "an opportunity to punish a rival media outlet." As a consequence of the financial crisis, the European newspapers and magazine publishers are also trying to lobby for tougher copyright laws. A public call to the European Commission in this respect was signed at a meeting on 26 June in Berlin, convened by the European Publishers' Council and the World Association of Newspapers. The letter was based on a German initiative called the "Hamburg Declaration' adopted by 149 German publishers earlier that month. The letter stated that: "Numerous providers are using the work of authors, publishers and broadcasters without paying for it. Over the long term, this threatens the production of high-quality content and the existence of independent journalism. For this reason, we advocate strongly urgent improvements in the protection of intellectual property on the Internet." The new call is also trying to have the Automated Content Access Protocol (ACAP), pushed by the publishers industry as the perfect solution to avoid copying news, imposed by law ACAP is a meta data standard that aims at specifing how online aggregators (including search engines) handle a publisher's work by defining usage by third parties rights. Bill Extends Copyright Protection to News (22.07.2009) http://www.moscowtimes.ru/article/1010/42/379728.htm European Publishers Call on E.U. to Protect Copyright (9.07.2009) http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/10/technology/internet/10copyright.html?_r=1 European publishers want a law to control online news access (10.07.2009) http://arstechnica.com/media/news/2009/07/european-publishers-want-news-acc… International publishers demand new intellectual property rights protection to safeguard the future of journalism (9.07.2009) http://www.epceurope.org/presscentre/archive/International_publishers_deman… ============================================================ 9. Recommended Action ============================================================ Call for new Experts to the EU Agency ENISA's Permanent Stakeholders' Group Do you have the competence to be one of the Experts advising ENISA? The European Network and Information Security Agency, i.e. the EU Agency ENISA, is launching the call for new members to its Permanent Stakeholders' Group (PSG). The PSG advises the Executive Director in e.g. drawing up a proposal for the Agency's work programme, and all issues related thereto. Deadline for applications: 30 October 2009 http://www.enisa.europa.eu/pages/02_01_press_2009_07_17_psg_call.html ============================================================ 10. Recommended Reading ============================================================ European Court of Justice Decision - Infopaq International A/S vs Danske Dagblades Forening (19.07.2009) http://curia.europa.eu/jurisp/cgi-bin/gettext.pl?lang=en&num=79909283C19080… The copying and reproduction of just 11 words of a news article can be copyright infringement, the European Court of Justice (ECJ) has ruled. Europe's highest court has said that a clippings service's copying could be unlawful. http://www.out-law.com/default.aspx?page=10205 French Parliament Information Report on the Police Files (only in French, 2009) http://www.assemblee-nationale.fr/13/pdf/rap-info/i1548.pdf ============================================================ 11. Agenda ============================================================ 13-16 August 2009, Vierhouten, The Netherlands Hacking at Random http://www.har2009.org/ 23-27 August 2009, Milan, Italy World Library and Information Congress: 75th IFLA General Conference and Council: "Libraries create futures: Building on cultural heritage" http://www.ifla.org/IV/ifla75/index.htm 10-12 September 2009, Potsdam, Germany 5th ECPR General Conference, Potsdam Section: Protest Politics Panel: The Contentious Politics of Intellectual Property http://www.ecpr.org.uk/potsdam/default.asp 12 September 2009, Worldwide 2nd International Action Day "Freedom not Fear - Stop the Surveillance Mania" Demonstrations, Events, Privacy Parties etc. in many countries http://wiki.vorratsdatenspeicherung.de/Freedom_Not_Fear_2009 16-18 September 2009, Crete, Greece World Summit on the Knowledge Society WSKS 2009 http://www.open-knowledge-society.org/ 17-18 September 2009, Amsterdam, Netherlands Gikii, A Workshop on Law, Technology and Popular Culture Institute for Information Law (IViR) - University of Amsterdam http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/gikii/2009.asp 23-24 September 2009, Copenhagen, Denmark The Net will not forget European conference on ICT and Privacy http://www.ict-privacy.dk/ 29-30 September 2009, Warsaw, Poland 3rd International Conference "Keeping Children and Young People Safe Online" http://konferencja.saferinternet.pl/articles-2009/3rd_international_confere… 16 October 2009, Bielefeld, Germany 10th German Big Brother Awards http://www.bigbrotherawards.de/ 21-23 October 2009, Istanbul, Turkey eChallenges 2009 http://www.echallenges.org/e2009/default.asp 24-25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria 3rd European Privacy Open Space http://www.privacyos.eu 25 October 2009, Vienna, Austria Austrian Big Brother Awards Deadline for nominations: 21 September 2009 http://www.bigbrotherawards.at/ 29 October - 1 November 2009, Barcelona, Spain International Forum on Free Culture http://exgae.net/los-oxcars 3 November 2009, Madrid, Spain Civil Society Conference: "Global Privacy Standards for a Global Economy" Organized by Electronic Privacy Information Center http://www.privacyconference2009.org/privacyconf2009/home/eventos_previos/C… 4-6 November 2009, Madrid, Spain 31st International Conference of Data Protection and Privacy http://www.privacyconference2009.org 13-15 November 2009, Gothenburg, Sweden Free Society Conference and Nordic Summit http://www.fscons.org/ 15-18 November 2009, Sharm El Sheikh, Egypt UN Internet Governance Forum http://www.intgovforum.org/ ============================================================ 12. About ============================================================ EDRI-gram is a biweekly newsletter about digital civil rights in Europe. Currently EDRI has 29 members based or with offices in 18 different countries in Europe. European Digital Rights takes an active interest in developments in the EU accession countries and wants to share knowledge and awareness through the EDRI-grams. All contributions, suggestions for content, corrections or agenda-tips are most welcome. Errors are corrected as soon as possible and visibly on the EDRI website. Except where otherwise noted, this newsletter is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License. See the full text at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ Newsletter editor: Bogdan Manolea <edrigram(a)edri.org> Information about EDRI and its members: http://www.edri.org/ European Digital Rights needs your help in upholding digital rights in the EU. If you wish to help us promote digital rights, please consider making a private donation. http://www.edri.org/about/sponsoring - EDRI-gram subscription information subscribe by e-mail To: edri-news-request(a)edri.org Subject: subscribe You will receive an automated e-mail asking to confirm your request. unsubscribe by e-mail To: edri-news-request(a)edri.org Subject: unsubscribe - EDRI-gram in Macedonian EDRI-gram is also available partly in Macedonian, with delay. Translations are provided by Metamorphosis http://www.metamorphosis.org.mk/edrigram-mk.php - EDRI-gram in German EDRI-gram is also available in German, with delay. Translations are provided Andreas Krisch from the EDRI-member VIBE!AT - Austrian Association for Internet Users http://www.unwatched.org/ - Newsletter archive Back issues are available at: http://www.edri.org/edrigram - Help Please ask <edrigram(a)edri.org> if you have any problems with subscribing or unsubscribing. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0