- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: FC: Maine National Guard bars Green Party leader from flying
by Mqrhoads＠aol.com 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

It is possible that this story happened exactly the way Nancy Oden wrote it up, but I would be very surprised if there is not another side to this story as well. Most National Guard enlisted soldiers have barely heard of the Green Party let alone would know who a Maine party leader was, what she wrote in a local paper, or would care. The National Guard units of Maine, like National Guard units in every other state, are on a very steep learning curve regarding how to manage airport security. It is not a duty that National Guard units routinely trained for before Sept. 11 except for those Guard and reserve units involved in Civil Administration. The National Guard soldiers will make plenty of mistakes, including big ones, along the way. Members of Guard units come from all civilian occupations and it is not impossible that a few might have voted for Green Party candidates in 2000. But to start a myth that every local activist is being targeted by the National Guard for his or her political views is just plain silly. As long as they are not carrying box cutters or pose a threat to other passengers, no one cares if Green Party officers fly to their heart's content from Bangor to Bute. But one wonders if riding a bike would not be more environmentally friendly than those polluting planes. Mark Rhoads U.S. Internet Council, and, for the sake of full disclosure, a former MP in the DC National Guard ******* Forwarded by Anonymous: > > LEADER OF GREEN SPLINTER GROUP FIBS ABOUT AIRPORT > HASSLE > > In an official press release from its Chicago > headquarters, the Greens/Green > Party USA, a small splinter group that opposes > recognition of the Green > Party > of the United States as the electoral voice of the > movement that ran Ralph > Nader for President in 2000, declared that one of its > leaders was stopped > from boarding a flight after a check turned up her > name was on a computer > list because the organization opposes the U.S. bombing > of Afhanistan. The > release said: > <Armed government agents grabbed Nancy Oden, Green > Party USA > coordinating committee member, Thursday at Bangor > International Airport > in Bangor Maine, as she attempted to board an American > Airlines flight to > Chicago. > "An official told me that my name had been flagged in > the computer," a > shaken Oden said. "I was targeted because the Green > Party USA opposes > the bombing of innocent civilians in Afghanistan."> > The press release was relayed around the nation as a > first signal of the > reach > of the new draconian Patriot Act. But it turns out > that Nancy Oden was > apparently not barred because of a computer check, but > because she did > not comply with standard screening for weapons. While > who said what is > not clear, it appears that her name was not flagged by > a computer search > of potential terrorists or their supporters, according > to a news report > in the Bangor Daily News on Nov. 3. > > While the undue harassment of airline travelers is to > be condemned, it does > not seem that this incident warrants fears of a major > violation of > Constitutional > guarantees of free speech, as it first appeared. The > group that Nancy Oden > leads is nevertheless using the incident to draw > attention and support to > itself. > One member of the group's National Council urged: > <The first thing to do is to organize a committee, > include spokesperson/ > spokespersons. Contact civil liberties organizations > including the National > Lawyers Guild, the ACLU ... Ask organizaitons to > sponsor defense > committee- Seek prominent attorney who may need to > have a license to > practice in Maine- Send releases out every day. Has > Ralph Nader been > contacted? What about Phil Donahue CONTACT TALK SHOWS. > TRY > TO GET POLITICIANS TO SUPPORT, Barbara Lee. > Organizations in > Maine who know Nancy and will back her up.> > > If the incident had taken place as Nancy Oden > described it, it would mean > that other Green activists and leaders of other > anti-war groups would also > be on computer lists and barred from flying, which > reportedly has not been > the case. The exaggeration of her victimization may > only serve to discredit > opposition to the Bush Administration's attack on > civil liberties. > > It may also further isolate the Green Party USA, which > saw a majority of > delegates at its July 20 National Convention leave to > form a new Green > Alliance, which has its first convention in New > Orleans January 18-21. ******* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice. Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/ To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

FC: Green Party official refused security check, airline says
by Declan McCullagh 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

This Bangor Daily News article tells a different story about the incident involving Green Party activist Nancy Oden at a Maine airport last week: http://www.bangornews.com/editorialnews/article.html?ID=44958 The article, by Jeff Tuttle, says: >[Oden] was grounded at Bangor International Airport on Thursday after >reportedly becoming uncooperative when she was targeted for additional >screening... "She was uncooperative during the screening process," said >American Eagle spokesman Kurt Iverson, who added that Oden reportedly >would not stand still when security staff tried to wave a metal-detecting >wand over her. "Obviously if they can't submit to screening, [Federal >Aviation Administration] regulations require that they not be allowed to >board the plane." The Green Party has put out a press release, which contains no evidence to buttress Oden's claim that she was singled out before even arriving at the airport for her political views: http://www.greenparty.org/bangor.txt Previous Politech message and interview with Oden: http://www.wartimeliberty.com/article.pl?sid=01/11/03/1813233&mode=thread *******

1 0

Lucrative update
by Patrick 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Lucrative release 4 is out. I know many people are used to seeing releases numbered like "0.000001", "0.000002", "2.0.3.0.14.657" etc. but release numbering systems are essentially arbitrary in nature so don't get excited as Lucrative goes toward version 50+. This release is a fairly minor one, but included some changes such as the client name that I wanted to get out as soon as possible. There is also a new development weblog at http://lucrative.thirdhost.com/weblog/. I went through an install with someone over IRC last night and made a blog entry summarizing the install notes. I recommend reading the notes before attempting an install. I am glad to help with an install, drop me a note at patrick(a)lfcgate.com if you have trouble. Some documentation on the various entities in the Lucrative system is now available on the website, http://lucrative.thirdhost.com/documentation.php but more is needed and coming. If Lucrative is interesting to you, please consider helping in any way you can: Feedback Installation reports Suggestions Comments Criticism Feature requests Source code patches Donations Are all very much welcomed. And criticism is more useful to me than praise. My sincere thanks to everyone who has participated so far by installing, testing, providing feedback, spreading the word, and donating. And finally I just received word from SourceForge that the project registration for Lucrative has been approved. Regards, Patrick -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> mQGiBD5ECKcRBADUvjXHwLtxIyS4AyjBs/dFtN6rdeP18Fhzh1hD5fJwkFevqY9Z I1ASROTh6eXYF7pU5sEvbcPshHyTB41ZtTqZvQvpwWN0fUzOuutuI0mtC5UPp9Rz j47SdWLdEXNHjwnHDCYSyqtqZu8GujGRQybR0eP3NIh/NwbSDUKdgz7IjwCg//Jo UtjP3zUFobm/0UYA+CJ5krED/091x9Js0gwNwvjbzM8DqO+r8qNz0kXI13FkrPRk QNd37lxt6m2m8HZD1WYM2wKwtMzHSwJcWzaDZ/tNc+ppYjzpw0EQCh9FqjGs8Vau guF6PA1M8lJTCcLKaL4e7ynic+PAw5Xa/tdOYgFCG+eLMU5RLvzRCYoOLIjgMJLJ yG98BACAMlDmFVYgC/UKvzZmHfZ5CtCKd8sPfCXrYLu5NeFRE0LR6D6zjzmhi1xX okfreR5o3T/y78VBM98js+m2/+7Z0AElqydeW/RnV1zqwDGjDr9z2MgARf3yLAbs n3BU8Fz61RwvHy6cRkT+2dR2f69QQUSpkupvLwZIGX/iwm4uKLQdUGF0cmljayA8 cGF0cmlja0BsZmNnYXRlLmNvbT6JAE4EEBECAA4FAj5ECKcECwMCAQIZAQAKCRBb mvb9yuOVfaA2AKDAu5tDj9F2KI8cJMrKKkQRAcUyxACg6/bei7lUJH+E5igJqGRx SjKrRA65BA0EPkQIpxAQAPkYoH5aBmF6Q5CV3AVsh4bsYezNRR8O2OCjecbJ3HoL rOQ/40aUtjBKU9d8AhZIgLUV5SmZqZ8HdNP/46HFliBOmGW42A3uEF2rthccUdhQ yiJXQym+lehWKzh4XAvb+ExN1eOqRsz7zhfoKp0UYeOEqU/Rg4Soebbvj6dDRgjG zB13VyQ4SuLE8OiOE2eXTpITYfbb6yUOF/32mPfIfHmwch04dfv2wXPEgxEmK0Ng w+Po1gr9oSgmC66prrNlD6IAUwGgfNaroxIe+g8qzh90hE/K8xfzpEDp19J3tkIt AjbBJstoXp18mAkKjX4t7eRdefXUkk+bGI78KqdLfDL2Qle3CH8IF3KiutapQvMF 6PlTETlPtvFuuUs4INoBp1ajFOmPQFXz0AfGy0OplK33TGSGSfgMg71l6RfUodNQ +PVZX9x2Uk89PY3bzpnhV5JZzf24rnRPxfx2vIPFRzBhznzJZv8V+bv9kV7HAarT W56NoKVyOtQa8L9GAFgr5fSI/VhOSdvNILSd5JEHNmszbDgNRR0PfIizHHxbLY72 88kjwEPwpVsYjY67VYy4XTjTNP18F1dDox0YbN4zISy1Kv884bEpQBgRjXyEpwpy 1obEAxnIByl6ypUM2Zafq9AKUJsCRtMIPWakXUGfnHy9iUsiGSa6q6Jew1XrPdYX AAICD/wKwtF7Y4NKBe8PQ6jDbjWziiTv9Ac/EnRTJDQEoqgLa2LyE+6Ahw/VPGvp mfxkD2MKxC9E7kYVmasn6sHnSpvAv3e7O1Bqbo/qLzzCcJQ5VCurZ+elRM1GZ4Oc fM19FPKutb0/JFEv0nrqS4BGkF7WFBbu5dKYl/GIO7Co1mAerFIb719dOwMPVEIz OT08u8uB9jyR8gEElf+CVuNfOUkrUGg4HS4SbmTTrCSz3/8n5PkquSuAyjCB/dwM ZsZwA0/TTR8sDYlmlf9xPj5PGpGnV9OUwfig6eE0eWtRFeasmz0uiX+yp45ABtNh 6EXP/PFaBgXi9omXXjeeFYfpDvmfA6izvTIQfXTV6V9ZWrBfXarM+GQ+6guXWVbd 9fXvmCr982LkzuKQrK1OpRXBMUapXL+tOy/LYzz91InqKKhgPNGa12fvotZ4LzlM iqoM+Hpz5L9B5We1Ph0lD6RBVXDCqd+P8extnY/7AaDy7tC0UghaAaUuEZXJQPIc oQ3QGbpjM0nGe/VZN5EZhljau0NNENFaU56cOpvOhcO04gLGNNc2NS+rIpTMsaHh o1CG90c5zZZJuUbyx0mIHriNQXDgEwunSZPQorKK9KSppyyjeuOyi5F/mBBPXeyT weLhLqLvAr9se/+Z3aQvMADJi8zUZtGggLTw+N9R5XSwtSh2R4kARgQYEQIABgUC PkQIpwAKCRBbmvb9yuOVfWayAKC+mBhHdn1XZ5uH0RocAyJ32hx2kgCePyhB+IqM TjWLDLarQxcPYhbkFi4= =nx1M -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo(a)wasabisystems.com

1 0

Re: [ipv6hackers] IPv6 prefix changing
by Owen DeLong 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

It isn't law (yet) in Germany, but, since many of the ISPs there think that it is, it might as well be. Also, likely it will become a law, especially if a significant fraction of ISPs don't implement it without one. It's really unfortunate, because the recommendation is actually more concerned about the suffix portion than the prefix portion and states that it should be up to the subscriber's preference. However, like most recommendations, it suffers from the telephone game (the more parties involved in relaying a message, the more mutated the message becomes) and the human tendency towards over-simplification creates an implementation attitude of simply forcing periodic prefix changes to "satisfy German privacy laws". IMHO, better would be to default to a static prefix, inform customers of the option of using privacy addresses (non-MAC based SLAAC addresses) which are now default (unfortunately) on Windows and MacOS anyway. Offer customers that want a dynamic prefix the option. This should satisfy German privacy concerns while still allowing most customers to get sane IPv6 deployments. Owen On Mar 6, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Alex List wrote: > According to [1] there's no such law in Germany. Btw, if someone could > point me out where one could find such law in any country, I would be very > thankful. > > @Sara: try to search for 'dynamic prefix nanog' > > Regards, Alex > > Refs: > [1] > http://www.datenschutz-hamburg.de/uploads/media/IPv6_Aufsatz_in_MMR-08-2011…, > page 5: "Regulierung der Adressvergabe" > _______________________________________________ > Ipv6hackers mailing list > Ipv6hackers(a)lists.si6networks.com > http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers _______________________________________________ Ipv6hackers mailing list Ipv6hackers(a)lists.si6networks.com http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

More on Nancy Oden
by Glenn Reynolds 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Seems she's got a background of association with ecoterrorism. http://instapundit.blogspot.com/2001_11_04_instapundit_archive.html#6855693 ******* Glenn's above URL says: >NANCY ODEN UPDATE: Turns out there's good reason for Nancy Oden to be >suspected of terrorist links -- ecoterrorist links, that is. See this >item from the Bangor Daily News, pointed out to me by reader Paul >Zrimsek. Oden denied any linkage with the ecoterrorism in question, but >in a very bin Ladenesque "I didn't do it but I approve" kind of way. >Given that ecoterrorism is, in fact, the most prevalent and widespread >form of domestic terrorism, and has continued since 9/11, her presence on >a watch list doesn't seem especially unreasonable in light of heightened >security concerns and fears (though probably wrong) that the anthrax >mailings were masterminded by domestic groups, and her presence on such a >list is likely to be on that basis, and unlikely to have anything to do >with the Green Party's positions on Afghanistan. *******

1 0

Re: FC: Maine National Guard bars Green Party leader from flying
by Mqrhoads＠aol.com 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

It is possible that this story happened exactly the way Nancy Oden wrote it up, but I would be very surprised if there is not another side to this story as well. Most National Guard enlisted soldiers have barely heard of the Green Party let alone would know who a Maine party leader was, what she wrote in a local paper, or would care. The National Guard units of Maine, like National Guard units in every other state, are on a very steep learning curve regarding how to manage airport security. It is not a duty that National Guard units routinely trained for before Sept. 11 except for those Guard and reserve units involved in Civil Administration. The National Guard soldiers will make plenty of mistakes, including big ones, along the way. Members of Guard units come from all civilian occupations and it is not impossible that a few might have voted for Green Party candidates in 2000. But to start a myth that every local activist is being targeted by the National Guard for his or her political views is just plain silly. As long as they are not carrying box cutters or pose a threat to other passengers, no one cares if Green Party officers fly to their heart's content from Bangor to Bute. But one wonders if riding a bike would not be more environmentally friendly than those polluting planes. Mark Rhoads U.S. Internet Council, and, for the sake of full disclosure, a former MP in the DC National Guard ******* Forwarded by Anonymous: > > LEADER OF GREEN SPLINTER GROUP FIBS ABOUT AIRPORT > HASSLE > > In an official press release from its Chicago > headquarters, the Greens/Green > Party USA, a small splinter group that opposes > recognition of the Green > Party > of the United States as the electoral voice of the > movement that ran Ralph > Nader for President in 2000, declared that one of its > leaders was stopped > from boarding a flight after a check turned up her > name was on a computer > list because the organization opposes the U.S. bombing > of Afhanistan. The > release said: > <Armed government agents grabbed Nancy Oden, Green > Party USA > coordinating committee member, Thursday at Bangor > International Airport > in Bangor Maine, as she attempted to board an American > Airlines flight to > Chicago. > "An official told me that my name had been flagged in > the computer," a > shaken Oden said. "I was targeted because the Green > Party USA opposes > the bombing of innocent civilians in Afghanistan."> > The press release was relayed around the nation as a > first signal of the > reach > of the new draconian Patriot Act. But it turns out > that Nancy Oden was > apparently not barred because of a computer check, but > because she did > not comply with standard screening for weapons. While > who said what is > not clear, it appears that her name was not flagged by > a computer search > of potential terrorists or their supporters, according > to a news report > in the Bangor Daily News on Nov. 3. > > While the undue harassment of airline travelers is to > be condemned, it does > not seem that this incident warrants fears of a major > violation of > Constitutional > guarantees of free speech, as it first appeared. The > group that Nancy Oden > leads is nevertheless using the incident to draw > attention and support to > itself. > One member of the group's National Council urged: > <The first thing to do is to organize a committee, > include spokesperson/ > spokespersons. Contact civil liberties organizations > including the National > Lawyers Guild, the ACLU ... Ask organizaitons to > sponsor defense > committee- Seek prominent attorney who may need to > have a license to > practice in Maine- Send releases out every day. Has > Ralph Nader been > contacted? What about Phil Donahue CONTACT TALK SHOWS. > TRY > TO GET POLITICIANS TO SUPPORT, Barbara Lee. > Organizations in > Maine who know Nancy and will back her up.> > > If the incident had taken place as Nancy Oden > described it, it would mean > that other Green activists and leaders of other > anti-war groups would also > be on computer lists and barred from flying, which > reportedly has not been > the case. The exaggeration of her victimization may > only serve to discredit > opposition to the Bush Administration's attack on > civil liberties. > > It may also further isolate the Green Party USA, which > saw a majority of > delegates at its July 20 National Convention leave to > form a new Green > Alliance, which has its first convention in New > Orleans January 18-21. ******* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- POLITECH -- Declan McCullagh's politics and technology mailing list You may redistribute this message freely if you include this notice. Declan McCullagh's photographs are at http://www.mccullagh.org/ To subscribe to Politech: http://www.politechbot.com/info/subscribe.html This message is archived at http://www.politechbot.com/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----- End forwarded message -----

1 0

FC: Green Party official refused security check, airline says
by Declan McCullagh 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

This Bangor Daily News article tells a different story about the incident involving Green Party activist Nancy Oden at a Maine airport last week: http://www.bangornews.com/editorialnews/article.html?ID=44958 The article, by Jeff Tuttle, says: >[Oden] was grounded at Bangor International Airport on Thursday after >reportedly becoming uncooperative when she was targeted for additional >screening... "She was uncooperative during the screening process," said >American Eagle spokesman Kurt Iverson, who added that Oden reportedly >would not stand still when security staff tried to wave a metal-detecting >wand over her. "Obviously if they can't submit to screening, [Federal >Aviation Administration] regulations require that they not be allowed to >board the plane." The Green Party has put out a press release, which contains no evidence to buttress Oden's claim that she was singled out before even arriving at the airport for her political views: http://www.greenparty.org/bangor.txt Previous Politech message and interview with Oden: http://www.wartimeliberty.com/article.pl?sid=01/11/03/1813233&mode=thread *******

1 0

Lucrative update
by Patrick 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Lucrative release 4 is out. I know many people are used to seeing releases numbered like "0.000001", "0.000002", "2.0.3.0.14.657" etc. but release numbering systems are essentially arbitrary in nature so don't get excited as Lucrative goes toward version 50+. This release is a fairly minor one, but included some changes such as the client name that I wanted to get out as soon as possible. There is also a new development weblog at http://lucrative.thirdhost.com/weblog/. I went through an install with someone over IRC last night and made a blog entry summarizing the install notes. I recommend reading the notes before attempting an install. I am glad to help with an install, drop me a note at patrick(a)lfcgate.com if you have trouble. Some documentation on the various entities in the Lucrative system is now available on the website, http://lucrative.thirdhost.com/documentation.php but more is needed and coming. If Lucrative is interesting to you, please consider helping in any way you can: Feedback Installation reports Suggestions Comments Criticism Feature requests Source code patches Donations Are all very much welcomed. And criticism is more useful to me than praise. My sincere thanks to everyone who has participated so far by installing, testing, providing feedback, spreading the word, and donating. And finally I just received word from SourceForge that the project registration for Lucrative has been approved. Regards, Patrick -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.3 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> mQGiBD5ECKcRBADUvjXHwLtxIyS4AyjBs/dFtN6rdeP18Fhzh1hD5fJwkFevqY9Z I1ASROTh6eXYF7pU5sEvbcPshHyTB41ZtTqZvQvpwWN0fUzOuutuI0mtC5UPp9Rz j47SdWLdEXNHjwnHDCYSyqtqZu8GujGRQybR0eP3NIh/NwbSDUKdgz7IjwCg//Jo UtjP3zUFobm/0UYA+CJ5krED/091x9Js0gwNwvjbzM8DqO+r8qNz0kXI13FkrPRk QNd37lxt6m2m8HZD1WYM2wKwtMzHSwJcWzaDZ/tNc+ppYjzpw0EQCh9FqjGs8Vau guF6PA1M8lJTCcLKaL4e7ynic+PAw5Xa/tdOYgFCG+eLMU5RLvzRCYoOLIjgMJLJ yG98BACAMlDmFVYgC/UKvzZmHfZ5CtCKd8sPfCXrYLu5NeFRE0LR6D6zjzmhi1xX okfreR5o3T/y78VBM98js+m2/+7Z0AElqydeW/RnV1zqwDGjDr9z2MgARf3yLAbs n3BU8Fz61RwvHy6cRkT+2dR2f69QQUSpkupvLwZIGX/iwm4uKLQdUGF0cmljayA8 cGF0cmlja0BsZmNnYXRlLmNvbT6JAE4EEBECAA4FAj5ECKcECwMCAQIZAQAKCRBb mvb9yuOVfaA2AKDAu5tDj9F2KI8cJMrKKkQRAcUyxACg6/bei7lUJH+E5igJqGRx SjKrRA65BA0EPkQIpxAQAPkYoH5aBmF6Q5CV3AVsh4bsYezNRR8O2OCjecbJ3HoL rOQ/40aUtjBKU9d8AhZIgLUV5SmZqZ8HdNP/46HFliBOmGW42A3uEF2rthccUdhQ yiJXQym+lehWKzh4XAvb+ExN1eOqRsz7zhfoKp0UYeOEqU/Rg4Soebbvj6dDRgjG zB13VyQ4SuLE8OiOE2eXTpITYfbb6yUOF/32mPfIfHmwch04dfv2wXPEgxEmK0Ng w+Po1gr9oSgmC66prrNlD6IAUwGgfNaroxIe+g8qzh90hE/K8xfzpEDp19J3tkIt AjbBJstoXp18mAkKjX4t7eRdefXUkk+bGI78KqdLfDL2Qle3CH8IF3KiutapQvMF 6PlTETlPtvFuuUs4INoBp1ajFOmPQFXz0AfGy0OplK33TGSGSfgMg71l6RfUodNQ +PVZX9x2Uk89PY3bzpnhV5JZzf24rnRPxfx2vIPFRzBhznzJZv8V+bv9kV7HAarT W56NoKVyOtQa8L9GAFgr5fSI/VhOSdvNILSd5JEHNmszbDgNRR0PfIizHHxbLY72 88kjwEPwpVsYjY67VYy4XTjTNP18F1dDox0YbN4zISy1Kv884bEpQBgRjXyEpwpy 1obEAxnIByl6ypUM2Zafq9AKUJsCRtMIPWakXUGfnHy9iUsiGSa6q6Jew1XrPdYX AAICD/wKwtF7Y4NKBe8PQ6jDbjWziiTv9Ac/EnRTJDQEoqgLa2LyE+6Ahw/VPGvp mfxkD2MKxC9E7kYVmasn6sHnSpvAv3e7O1Bqbo/qLzzCcJQ5VCurZ+elRM1GZ4Oc fM19FPKutb0/JFEv0nrqS4BGkF7WFBbu5dKYl/GIO7Co1mAerFIb719dOwMPVEIz OT08u8uB9jyR8gEElf+CVuNfOUkrUGg4HS4SbmTTrCSz3/8n5PkquSuAyjCB/dwM ZsZwA0/TTR8sDYlmlf9xPj5PGpGnV9OUwfig6eE0eWtRFeasmz0uiX+yp45ABtNh 6EXP/PFaBgXi9omXXjeeFYfpDvmfA6izvTIQfXTV6V9ZWrBfXarM+GQ+6guXWVbd 9fXvmCr982LkzuKQrK1OpRXBMUapXL+tOy/LYzz91InqKKhgPNGa12fvotZ4LzlM iqoM+Hpz5L9B5We1Ph0lD6RBVXDCqd+P8extnY/7AaDy7tC0UghaAaUuEZXJQPIc oQ3QGbpjM0nGe/VZN5EZhljau0NNENFaU56cOpvOhcO04gLGNNc2NS+rIpTMsaHh o1CG90c5zZZJuUbyx0mIHriNQXDgEwunSZPQorKK9KSppyyjeuOyi5F/mBBPXeyT weLhLqLvAr9se/+Z3aQvMADJi8zUZtGggLTw+N9R5XSwtSh2R4kARgQYEQIABgUC PkQIpwAKCRBbmvb9yuOVfWayAKC+mBhHdn1XZ5uH0RocAyJ32hx2kgCePyhB+IqM TjWLDLarQxcPYhbkFi4= =nx1M -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- --- end forwarded text -- ----------------- R. A. Hettinga <mailto: rah(a)ibuc.com> The Internet Bearer Underwriting Corporation <http://www.ibuc.com/> 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo(a)wasabisystems.com

1 0

Re: [ipv6hackers] IPv6 prefix changing
by Owen DeLong 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

It isn't law (yet) in Germany, but, since many of the ISPs there think that it is, it might as well be. Also, likely it will become a law, especially if a significant fraction of ISPs don't implement it without one. It's really unfortunate, because the recommendation is actually more concerned about the suffix portion than the prefix portion and states that it should be up to the subscriber's preference. However, like most recommendations, it suffers from the telephone game (the more parties involved in relaying a message, the more mutated the message becomes) and the human tendency towards over-simplification creates an implementation attitude of simply forcing periodic prefix changes to "satisfy German privacy laws". IMHO, better would be to default to a static prefix, inform customers of the option of using privacy addresses (non-MAC based SLAAC addresses) which are now default (unfortunately) on Windows and MacOS anyway. Offer customers that want a dynamic prefix the option. This should satisfy German privacy concerns while still allowing most customers to get sane IPv6 deployments. Owen On Mar 6, 2012, at 12:11 PM, Alex List wrote: > According to [1] there's no such law in Germany. Btw, if someone could > point me out where one could find such law in any country, I would be very > thankful. > > @Sara: try to search for 'dynamic prefix nanog' > > Regards, Alex > > Refs: > [1] > http://www.datenschutz-hamburg.de/uploads/media/IPv6_Aufsatz_in_MMR-08-2011…, > page 5: "Regulierung der Adressvergabe" > _______________________________________________ > Ipv6hackers mailing list > Ipv6hackers(a)lists.si6networks.com > http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers _______________________________________________ Ipv6hackers mailing list Ipv6hackers(a)lists.si6networks.com http://lists.si6networks.com/listinfo/ipv6hackers ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0

[DIYbio] Re: Aaron Swartz has committed suicide
by Bryan Bishop 06 Jul '18

06 Jul '18

Guerilla Open Access Manifesto > Information is power. But like all power, there are those who want to keep > it for themselves. The worldbs entire scientific and cultural heritage, > published over centuries in books and journals, is increasingly being > digitized and locked up by a handful of private corporations. Want to read > the papers featuring the most famous results of the sciences? Youbll need > to send enormous amounts to publishers like Reed Elsevier. > > There are those struggling to change this. The Open Access Movement has > fought valiantly to ensure that scientists do not sign their copyrights > away but instead ensure their work is published on the Internet, under > terms that allow anyone to access it. But even under the best scenarios, > their work will only apply to things published in the future. Everything up > until now will have been lost. > > That is too high a price to pay. Forcing academics to pay money to read > the work of their colleagues? Scanning entire libraries but only allowing > the folks at Google to read them? Providing scientific articles to those at > elite universities in the First World, but not to children in the Global > South? Itbs outrageous and unacceptable. > > b I agree,b many say, b but what can we do? The companies hold the > copyrights, they make enormous amounts of money by charging for access, and > itbs perfectly legal b therebs nothing we can do to stop them.b But there > is something we can, something thatbs already being done: we can fight back. > > Those with access to these resources b students, librarians, scientists b > you have been given a privilege. You get to feed at this banquet of > knowledge while the rest of the world is locked out. But you need not b > indeed, morally, you cannot b keep this privilege for yourselves. You have > a duty to share it with the world. And you have: trading passwords with > colleagues, filling download requests for friends. > > Meanwhile, those who have been locked out are not standing idly by. You > have been sneaking through holes and climbing over fences, liberating the > information locked up by the publishers and sharing them with your friends. > > But all of this action goes on in the dark, hidden underground. Itbs > called stealing or piracy, as if sharing a wealth of knowledge were the > moral equivalent of plundering a ship and murdering its crew. But sharing > isnbt immoral b itbs a moral imperative. Only those blinded by greed would > refuse to let a friend make a copy. > > Large corporations, of course, are blinded by greed. The laws under which > they operate require it b their shareholders would revolt at anything less. > And the politicians they have bought off back them, passing laws giving > them the exclusive power to decide who can make copies. > > There is no justice in following unjust laws. Itbs time to come into the > light and, in the grand tradition of civil disobedience, declare our > opposition to this private theft of public culture. > > We need to take information, wherever it is stored, make our copies and > share them with the world. We need to take stuff that's out of copyright > and add it to the archive. We need to buy secret databases and put them on > the Web. We need to download scientific journals and upload them to file > sharing networks. We need to fight for Guerilla Open Access. > > With enough of us, around the world, webll not just send a strong message > opposing the privatization of knowledge b webll make it a thing of the > past. Will you join us? > > Aaron Swartz July 2008, Eremo, Italy > - Bryan http://heybryan.org/ 1 512 203 0507 -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups DIYbio group. To post to this group, send email to diybio(a)googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at https://groups.google.com/d/forum/diybio?hl=en Learn more at www.diybio.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DIYbio" group. To post to this group, send email to diybio(a)googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to diybio+unsubscribe(a)googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/diybio?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> http://leitl.org ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07100, 11.36820 http://www.ativel.com http://postbiota.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE

1 0