- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

CDR: Illicit words
by Bruce J.A. Nourish 24 Oct '00

24 Oct '00

I read somewhere that the FBI/NSA/some other Big Bro. organisation has a list of words that they check your email against, and if they find any, they have someone read your mail. Anyone know what they are? TIA & HAND -- Bruce J.A. Nourish (keys - see header) <kode187(a)galadriel.kode187.net>

2 1

CDR: Declan My Lai
by John Young 24 Oct '00

24 Oct '00

Declan, Pounding out the hundreds of deathless reports you've done did you dream it would be the Gore My Lai that got you onto the NYTimes opinion page today?

2 1

CDR: 645,835 Search Engines/Resubmission Every Month.
by 645,101 Search Engines. 24 Oct '00

24 Oct '00

This Is A Service Not An Opportunity! DO YOU HAVE A WEB SITE? We are WebSite Search Engine Submission Service. We will take your WebSite and Submit it to over 645,101 Search Engines,Links,Directories,All Side Server Search Engines and all FFA Sites. We are the only company that will > Resubmit < Your WebSite Every Month for an Entire Year! Our Data Base is Updated Every Week so This Number will Grow. We Use the Most Sophisticated Digital Submission Software Ever Manufactured ! > For Complete info Just Click Reply < > and Type in the Body of the Message < > Search Engine Info< This is the first and most Important Step of E-Commerce and Advertising on the Internet that you will ever Make. Thank You

1 0

CDR: QuickBooks format
by Svetoslav Ivanov 24 Oct '00

24 Oct '00

Hello, I read an e-mail from you for QuikBooks data format. Can you send me anything, if you have received in this way? Thanks! Svetoslav Ivanov, Varna, Bulgaria

1 0

CDR: judges needing killing...
by anonymous＠openpgp.net 23 Oct '00

23 Oct '00

Oct 19, 2000 - 06:55 AM California Court Declines to Review Vehicle Forfeiture Law The Associated Press SAN FRANCISCO (AP) - The state Supreme Court has declined to review a ruling allowing police to seize vehicles suspected of use in crimes such as drug dealing or soliciting a prostitute. Without comment, a majority of justices Wednesday decided not to hear the American Civil Liberties Unions challenge to Oaklands 1997 vehicle seizure law. Under the law, a car can be confiscated even if the crime suspect using the vehicle is acquitted, or the cars owner was unaware of the crime. The measure exceeds state and federal standards. The ACLU argued that cities looking to profit from seizures would enact similar measures. So far, Sacramento has put a comparable law on its books but San Francisco lawmakers shelved the idea last month, concluding it was unconstitutional. Since passing the "nuisance abatement" act, Oakland has collected, sold and kept the profits from 300 cars. The impetus "was really complaints from certain communities which were essentially drive-thru sex-and-drug bazaars. People were sick of having lines of cars in their streets with this activity going on," said Oakland Deputy City Attorney Pelayo Llamas. http://ap.tbo.com/ap/breaking/MGAWJXNBIEC.html

9 12

CDR: Important Membership Information
by announce＠inbox.nytimes.com 23 Oct '00

23 Oct '00

Dear cypherpunks411a, Welcome to NYTimes.com! We are delighted that you have decided to become a member of our community. As a member you now have complete access to the Web's premier source for news and information -- free of charge. NYTimes.com not only provides you with in-depth coverage of events happening around the world but also with a wealth of additional features and services. The site is updated regularly throughout the day by New York Times reporters and editors to give you greater insight into events unfolding throughout the day. No matter what the hour, you can look to NYTimes.com for the most trustworthy coverage available and unique perspective you won't find anywhere else. Please feel free to explore the other areas of NYTimes.com. Here are some starting points you may find useful: ** Get NYTimes.com headlines e-mailed directly to you. Choose from the day's top stories, breaking news alerts and your favorite sections: http://email.nytimes.com/email/email.jsp?welcome ** Search and retrieve articles from The New York Times Archives back to 1996. Searches and summaries of articles are free, but there is a small fee for full text. http://archives.nytimes.com/archives?welcome ** Explore the Help Wanted and other classified listings on the Web: http://classifieds.nytimes.com/hw?welcome ** Get a free photo screensaver from The New York Times Photo Archives Choose from Vintage New York, Americana, Coney Island and more: http://www.nytimes.com/partners/screensaver/index.html?welcome ** Search our archive of 50,000 book reviews, listen to author interviews or sign-up for an exclusive weekly newsletter from our Books Editor: http://www.nytimes.com/books/home?welcome Thank you again for becoming a member. We hope that you will make a point of visiting the site often. Sincerely, Rich Meislin, Editor in Chief New York Times Digital P.S. Your opinions are important to us. Share your thoughts about the site with us by sending an e-mail to feedback(a)nytimes.com ************************************************************* Your account information is listed below for future reference: Your Member ID is cypherpunks411a You selected your password at registration. Your e-mail address is cypherpunks(a)toad.com If you did not authorize this registration, someone has mistakenly registered using your e-mail address. We regret the inconvenience; please see http://www.nytimes.com/subscribe/help/cancel.html for instructions.

1 0

CDR: Any Comments?
by mmotyka＠lsil.com 23 Oct '00

23 Oct '00

This sounds a little far-fetched to me. At the very least there have to be lots of items missed every day... http://cryptome.org/dark-spy.htm Mike

2 1

CDR: Re: why should it be trusted?
by An Metet 23 Oct '00

23 Oct '00

At 23:31 -0700 10/22/00, Tim May wrote: > As I wrote in my previous article, IT IS NOT TRUE that private > hospitals must accept all those who appear at their doorstep. This > would be a "taking," and is not constitutionally permissable. Unfortunately, I'd bet it's just a matter of time until some protected minority successfully sues such a hospital for "discriminating" against them for their assumed inability to pay. i.e. "They *assumed* I couldn't pay my bills I'm black and don't have insurance. How dare they turn me away, racists!" It doesn't seem to require much of a leap to go from "Denny's is public and can't refuse to serve blacks" to "St. John's is public and can't refuse to serve blacks." Hospitals will, of course, remain "free" to turn away adult white heterosexual males.

1 0

CDR: Zero-Knowledge -- Open Source Initiative = Responsible Privacy
by Declan McCullagh 23 Oct '00

23 Oct '00

>From: kcory(a)redwhistle.com >X-Lotus-FromDomain: WEBER >To: declan(a)well.com >Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2000 13:22:26 -0700 >Subject: Zero-Knowledge -- Open Source Initiative = Responsible Privacy > > > >Hi Declan, > >I wanted to let you know that Zero-Knowledge Systems today announced that >it has >open-sourced its Freedom Linux client, the first step in its initiative to >disseminate privacy protocols and encourage pervasive privacy standards by >open >sourcing its entire Freedom network and software. > >Through its open source initiative, Zero-Knowledge is pioneering a movement >toward responsible privacy by inviting software developers and >cryptographers to >test and improve upon the Freedom code. Only by opening the math and >cryptography behind privacy tools to industry examination can >Zero-Knowledge and >other privacy companies truly prove the efficacy of their privacy solutions. >I've included the announcement below for your information. > >If you would like further information or would like to speak with a >Zero-Knowledge executive about the open source initiative, please call me at >(503) 332-0204. > >Best regards, >Kristy Cory >for Zero-Knowledge >kcory(a)redwhistle.com >503-332-0204 > > > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE > > ZERO-KNOWLEDGE SYSTEMS RELEASES SOURCE CODE OF ITS NEW LINUX FREEDOM 2.0 > CLIENT; ANNOUNCES OPEN SOURCING OF FREEDOM PRIVACY SUITE > > --Source release demonstrates Zero-Knowledge Systems >' commitment to creating > open > standards and ubiquitous privacy technologies that benefit all Internet > users-- > > Montreal ? October 23, 2000 ? Zero-Knowledge® Systems Inc., the leading > developer of privacy solutions for consumers and companies, today > released the > source code of its next-generation Linux Freedom client. The company also > announced its commitment to open sourcing the entire award-winning Freedom® > privacy suite. > > This open source initiative demonstrates the company's commitment to > creating > open standards and ubiquitous privacy technologies that benefit all Internet > users. Using Freedom code developed by Zero-Knowledge, developers, > cryptographers and standards bodies will be able to build new open protocols > and technologies for protecting privacy. > > As the recognized privacy leader, Zero-Knowledge is fulfilling its > commitment > to deploy consumer products that are open and transparent in order to allow > anyone to verify how they perform. The release of source code provides the > software development and security communities the necessary proof that > Freedom > alone empowers consumers to trust only themselves with their data and > privacy. > > "Responsible privacy begins with privacy providers being open and > transparent > with their users. Zero-Knowledge is demonstrating its leadership by > releasing > the source code to Freedom and facilitating the creation of necessary > privacy > standards," said Mike Shaver, Chief Software Officer of Zero-Knowledge > Systems. > "We encourage other privacy companies to do the same." > > "Open source desktop users have a need for powerful privacy tools which > facilitate their use of network services. At Helix Code we are building a > world-class open source desktop environment that gives the user very > intimate > access to web services, and so privacy is especially important to our > users," > said Nat Friedman, Chief Executive Officer of Helix Code, the leading open > source desktop software and services company. "Now that Zero-Knowledge > System's > Freedom privacy suite will be open sourced and available for Linux, this > important need is finally being addressed. This is a big win for the open > source community." > > Freedom 2.0 for Windows (95/98, 2000, NT, Me) and Linux will be > available for > Internet users before Christmas 2000. The 2.0 version for Windows will > include > new features and performance enhancements requested by the Freedom user > community. A Macintosh version of Freedom is expected in 2001. Among other > accolades, Freedom was named 2000's "Most Promising Internet Newcomer" by PC > World and called "the Rolls-Royce of privacy software" by Yahoo! > Internet Life. > > The entire source code to the Linux version of the Freedom privacy suite, > released under the Mozilla Public License 1.1 and other Open Source? > licenses, > is available for download at http://opensource.zeroknowledge.com. > Zero-Knowledge will next release the source code to the Windows client > and to > the server software that powers the Freedom Network, a globally-distributed > network of servers operated by service providers and independent > operators that > route Freedom traffic. > > Freedom is the first commercial product that empowers Internet users to > fully > control their identities and personal information on the Internet without > having to trust their data to an ISP, privacy company or other third party. > Freedom transparently encrypts and reroutes Internet traffic, preventing the > accidental release of information that could compromise personal privacy > online. Users create multiple digital identities (pseudonyms, or "nyms") > that > they can associate with their Internet activities. > > About Zero-Knowledge Systems, Inc. > > Founded in 1997, Zero-Knowledge Systems (http://www.zeroknowledge.com) is > laying the digital infrastructure for privacy-enabled communications and > commerce between individuals, companies, governments and organizations. > Based > on its privacy infrastructure for the Internet, Zero-Knowledge creates > easy-to-use software and services that enable privacy through advanced > mathematics, cryptography and source code: the only reliable way to ensure > Internet privacy and security. > > In December 1999, Zero-Knowledge launched Freedom®, the only privacy system > that empowers Internet users to surf the Web, send email, chat and post to > newsgroups in total privacy without having to trust third parties with their > personal information. Freedom can be downloaded at http://www.freedom.net. > Journalists can visit the Zero-Knowledge pressroom at > http://www.zeroknowledge.com/media. > > (Freedom® and Zero-Knowledge® are registered trademarks of Zero-Knowledge > Systems, Inc. All other names are the property of their respective owners.) > > For more information > > Dov Smith > Director of Public Relations > 514.350.7553 > dov(a)zeroknowledge.com > > Kristy Cory > Red Whistle Communications > 503.552.3749 > kcory(a)redwhistle.com > > > > >

1 0

CDR: Re: Insurance (was: why should it be trusted?)
by Anonymous 23 Oct '00

23 Oct '00

> > I believe that the standard argument is "Eliminate the commons." (by > > auctioning off to the highest bidder perhaps) > > > > So who gets the bid on the environment ? There are some commons > that can not be eliminated so easily. Generally, this would be water and air. If someone pollutes the air over their land, that's ok. As soon as the pollution crosses into your land, you sue for damages. People are concerned about the long term value of their property, so they will have a disincentive to pollute. Not only do you have people holed up in their bunkers, awaiting the arrival of the grim crypto-reaper, but everyone has a lawyer or 4 on staff.

9 14