- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Часы в единственом экземпляре! Картинка внутри
by "Швейцарские часы, для мужчин и женщин" 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

1 0

Приглашение на выставку косметики ИНТЕРШАМ! 24-27 ОКТЯБРЯ
by "Выставка в Москве! " 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

1 0

Привет. У нас сегодня скидка 25% на мужские часы
by "Приручите время" 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

25 % НА ВСЕ МУЖСКИЕ ЧАСЫ! 100% ref У нас только Швейцарские механизмы!!! Все часы производятся в ЕВРОПЕ! Полезное видео про наши часы на youtube по запросу - Приручите время Смотрите и Не покупайте дешевые копии! Наш красивый сайт http://часы-тут.рф

1 0

"we can't possibly kill everyone who wants to harm us" but trying is "a necessary part of what we do"
by Eugen Leitl 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

(I still can't understand how Pol Pot, Stalin and Hitler were never nominated for a Nobel Peace Price). http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/oct/24/obama-terrorism-kill-li… Obama moves to make the War on Terror permanent Complete with a newly coined, creepy Orwellian euphemism b 'disposition matrix' b the administration institutionalizes the most extremist powers a government can claim Glenn Greenwald guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 24 October 2012 13.17 BST National Counterterrorism Center FBI The National Counterterrorism Center, the site of a new bureaucracy to institutionalize the 'kill list'. Photograph: FBI (updated below - Update II - Update III) A primary reason for opposing the acquisition of abusive powers and civil liberties erosions is that they virtually always become permanent, vested not only in current leaders one may love and trust but also future officials who seem more menacing and less benign. The Washington Post has a crucial and disturbing story this morning by Greg Miller about the concerted efforts by the Obama administration to fully institutionalize b to make officially permanent b the most extremist powers it has exercised in the name of the war on terror. Based on interviews with "current and former officials from the White House and the Pentagon, as well as intelligence and counterterrorism agencies", Miller reports that as "the United States' conventional wars are winding down", the Obama administration "expects to continue adding names to kill or capture lists for years" (the "capture" part of that list is little more than symbolic, as the US focus is overwhelmingly on the "kill" part). Specifically, "among senior Obama administration officials, there is broad consensus that such operations are likely to be extended at least another decade." As Miller puts it: "That timeline suggests that the United States has reached only the midpoint of what was once known as the global war on terrorism." In pursuit of this goal, "White House counterterrorism adviser John O Brennan is seeking to codify the administration's approach to generating capture/kill lists, part of a broader effort to guide future administrations through the counterterrorism processes that Obama has embraced." All of this, writes Miller, demonstrates "the extent to which Obama has institutionalized the highly classified practice of targeted killing, transforming ad-hoc elements into a counterterrorism infrastructure capable of sustaining a seemingly permanent war." The Post article cites numerous recent developments reflecting this Obama effort, including the fact that "CIA Director David H Petraeus is pushing for an expansion of the agency's fleet of armed drones", which "reflects the agency's transformation into a paramilitary force, and makes clear that it does not intend to dismantle its drone program and return to its pre-September 11 focus on gathering intelligence." The article also describes rapid expansion of commando operations by the US Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC) and, perhaps most disturbingly, the creation of a permanent bureaucratic infrastructure to allow the president to assassinate at will: "JSOC also has established a secret targeting center across the Potomac River from Washington, current and former U.S. officials said. The elite command's targeting cells have traditionally been located near the front lines of its missions, including in Iraq and Afghanistan. But JSOC created a 'national capital region' task force that is a 15-minute commute from the White House so it could be more directly involved in deliberations about al-Qaeda lists." The creepiest aspect of this development is the christening of a new Orwellian euphemism for due-process-free presidential assassinations: "disposition matrix". Writes Miller: "Over the past two years, the Obama administration has been secretly developing a new blueprint for pursuing terrorists, a next-generation targeting list called the 'disposition matrix'. "The matrix contains the names of terrorism suspects arrayed against an accounting of the resources being marshaled to track them down, including sealed indictments and clandestine operations. US officials said the database is designed to go beyond existing kill lists, mapping plans for the 'disposition' of suspects beyond the reach of American drones." The "disposition matrix" has been developed and will be overseen by the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC). One of its purposes is "to augment" the "separate but overlapping kill lists" maintained by the CIA and the Pentagon: to serve, in other words, as the centralized clearinghouse for determining who will be executed without due process based upon how one fits into the executive branch's "matrix". As Miller describes it, it is "a single, continually evolving database" which includes "biographies, locations, known associates and affiliated organizations" as well as "strategies for taking targets down, including extradition requests, capture operations and drone patrols". This analytical system that determines people's "disposition" will undoubtedly be kept completely secret; Marcy Wheeler sardonically said that she was "looking forward to the government's arguments explaining why it won't release the disposition matrix to ACLU under FOIA". This was all motivated by Obama's refusal to arrest or detain terrorist suspects, and his resulting commitment simply to killing them at will (his will). Miller quotes "a former US counterterrorism official involved in developing the matrix" as explaining the impetus behind the program this way: "We had a disposition problem." The central role played by the NCTC in determining who should be killed b "It is the keeper of the criteria," says one official to the Post b is, by itself, rather odious. As Kade Crockford of the ACLU of Massachusetts noted in response to this story, the ACLU has long warned that the real purpose of the NCTC b despite its nominal focus on terrorism - is the "massive, secretive data collection and mining of trillions of points of data about most people in the United States". In particular, the NCTC operates a gigantic data-mining operation, in which all sorts of information about innocent Americans is systematically monitored, stored, and analyzed. This includes "records from law enforcement investigations, health information, employment history, travel and student records" b "literally anything the government collects would be fair game". In other words, the NCTC - now vested with the power to determine the proper "disposition" of terrorist suspects - is the same agency that is at the center of the ubiquitous, unaccountable surveillance state aimed at American citizens. Worse still, as the ACLU's legislative counsel Chris Calabrese documented back in July in a must-read analysis, Obama officials very recently abolished safeguards on how this information can be used. Whereas the agency, during the Bush years, was barred from storing non-terrorist-related information about innocent Americans for more than 180 days b a limit which "meant that NCTC was dissuaded from collecting large databases filled with information on innocent Americans" b it is now free to do so. Obama officials eliminated this constraint by authorizing the NCTC "to collect and 'continually assess' information on innocent Americans for up to five years". And, as usual, this agency engages in these incredibly powerful and invasive processes with virtually no democratic accountability: "All of this is happening with very little oversight. Controls over the NCTC are mostly internal to the DNI's office, and important oversight bodies such as Congress and the President's Intelligence Oversight Board aren't notified even of 'significant' failures to comply with the Guidelines. Fundamental legal protections are being sidestepped. For example, under the new guidelines, Privacy Act notices (legal requirements to describe how databases are used) must be completed by the agency that collected the information. This is in spite of the fact that those agencies have no idea what NCTC is actually doing with the information once it collects it. "All of this amounts to a reboot of the Total Information Awareness Program that Americans rejected so vigorously right after 9/11." It doesn't require any conspiracy theorizing to see what's happening here. Indeed, it takes extreme naivetC), or wilful blindness, not to see it. What has been created here - permanently institutionalized - is a highly secretive executive branch agency that simultaneously engages in two functions: (1) it collects and analyzes massive amounts of surveillance data about all Americans without any judicial review let alone search warrants, and (2) creates and implements a "matrix" that determines the "disposition" of suspects, up to and including execution, without a whiff of due process or oversight. It is simultaneously a surveillance state and a secretive, unaccountable judicial body that analyzes who you are and then decrees what should be done with you, how you should be "disposed" of, beyond the reach of any minimal accountability or transparency. The Post's Miller recognizes the watershed moment this represents: "The creation of the matrix and the institutionalization of kill/capture lists reflect a shift that is as psychological as it is strategic." As he explains, extra-judicial assassination was once deemed so extremist that very extensive deliberations were required before Bill Clinton could target even Osama bin Laden for death by lobbing cruise missiles in East Africa. But: Targeted killing is now so routine that the Obama administration has spent much of the past year codifying and streamlining the processes that sustain it. To understand the Obama legacy, please re-read that sentence. As Murtaza Hussain put it when reacting to the Post story: "The US agonized over the targeted killing Bin Laden at Tarnak Farms in 1998; now it kills people it barely suspects of anything on a regular basis." The pragmatic inanity of the mentality driving this is self-evident: as I discussed yesterday (and many other times), continuous killing does not eliminate violence aimed at the US but rather guarantees its permanent expansion. As a result, wrote Miller, "officials said no clear end is in sight" when it comes to the war against "terrorists" because, said one official, "we can't possibly kill everyone who wants to harm us" but trying is "a necessary part of what we do". Of course, the more the US kills and kills and kills, the more people there are who "want to harm us". That's the logic that has resulted in a permanent war on terror. But even more significant is the truly radical vision of government in which this is all grounded. The core guarantee of western justice since the Magna Carta was codified in the US by the fifth amendment to the constitution: "No person shall . . . be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." You simply cannot have a free society, a worthwhile political system, without that guarantee, that constraint on the ultimate abusive state power, being honored. And yet what the Post is describing, what we have had for years, is a system of government that b without hyperbole b is the very antithesis of that liberty. It is literally impossible to imagine a more violent repudiation of the basic blueprint of the republic than the development of a secretive, totally unaccountable executive branch agency that simultaneously collects information about all citizens and then applies a "disposition matrix" to determine what punishment should be meted out. This is classic political dystopia brought to reality (despite how compelled such a conclusion is by these indisputable facts, many Americans will view such a claim as an exaggeration, paranoia, or worse because of this psychological dynamic I described here which leads many good passive westerners to believe that true oppression, by definition, is something that happens only elsewhere). In response to the Post story, Chris Hayes asked: "If you have a 'kill list', but the list keeps growing, are you succeeding?" The answer all depends upon what the objective is. As the Founders all recognized, nothing vests elites with power b and profit b more than a state of war. That is why there were supposed to be substantial barriers to having them start and continue - the need for a Congressional declaration, the constitutional bar on funding the military for more than two years at a time, the prohibition on standing armies, etc. Here is how John Jay put it in Federalist No 4: "It is too true, however disgraceful it may be to human nature, that nations in general will make war whenever they have a prospect of getting anything by it; nay, absolute monarchs will often make war when their nations are to get nothing by it, but for the purposes and objects merely personal, such as thirst for military glory, revenge for personal affronts, ambition, or private compacts to aggrandize or support their particular families or partisans. These and a variety of other motives, which affect only the mind of the sovereign, often lead him to engage in wars not sanctified by justice or the voice and interests of his people." In sum, there are factions in many governments that crave a state of endless war because that is when power is least constrained and profit most abundant. What the Post is reporting is yet another significant step toward that state, and it is undoubtedly driven, at least on the part of some, by a self-interested desire to ensure the continuation of endless war and the powers and benefits it vests. So to answer Hayes' question: the endless expansion of a kill list and the unaccountable, always-expanding powers needed to implement it does indeed represent a great success for many. Read what John Jay wrote in the above passage to see why that is, and why few, if any, political developments should be regarded as more pernicious. Detention policies Assuming the Post's estimates are correct b that "among senior Obama administration officials, there is broad consensus that such operations are likely to be extended at least another decade" b this means that the war on terror will last for more than 20 years, far longer than any other American war. This is what has always made the rationale for indefinite detention b that it is permissible to detain people without due process until the "end of hostilities" b so warped in this context. Those who are advocating that are endorsing nothing less than life imprisonment - permanent incarceration b without any charges or opportunities to contest the accusations. That people are now dying at Guantanamo after almost a decade in a cage with no charges highlights just how repressive that power is. Extend that mentality to secret, due-process-free assassinations b something the US government clearly intends to convert into a permanent fixture of American political life b and it is not difficult to see just how truly extremist and anti-democratic "war on terror" proponents in both political parties have become. UPDATE As I noted yesterday, Afghan officials reported that three Afghan children were killed on Saturday by NATO operations. Today, reports CNN, "missiles blew up part of a compound Wednesday in northwest Pakistan, killing three people - including one woman" and added: "the latest suspected U.S. drone strike also injured two children." Meanwhile, former Obama press secretary and current campaign adviser Robert Gibbs this week justified the US killing of 16-year-old American Abdulrahaman Awlaki, killed by a US drone in Yemen two weeks after his father was, on the ground that he "should have a far more responsible father". Also yesterday, CNN profiled Abu Sufyan Said al-Shihri, alleged to be a top al-Qaida official in Yemen. He pointed out "that U.S. drone strikes are helping al-Qaida in Yemen because of the number of civilian deaths they cause." Ample evidence supports his observation. To summarize all this: the US does not interfere in the Muslim world and maintain an endless war on terror because of the terrorist threat. It has a terrorist threat because of its interference in the Muslim world and its endless war on terror. UPDATE II The Council on Foreign Relations' Micah Zenko, writing today about the Post article, reports: "Recently, I spoke to a military official with extensive and wide-ranging experience in the special operations world, and who has had direct exposure to the targeted killing program. To emphasize how easy targeted killings by special operations forces or drones has become, this official flicked his hand back over and over, stating: 'It really is like swatting flies. We can do it forever easily and you feel nothing. But how often do you really think about killing a fly?'" That is disturbingly consistent with prior reports that the military's term for drone victims is "bug splat". This - this warped power and the accompanying dehumanizing mindset - is what is being institutionalized as a permanent fixture in American political life by the current president. UPDATE III At Wired, Spencer Ackerman reacts to the Post article with an analysis entitled "President Romney Can Thank Obama for His Permanent Robotic Death List". Here is his concluding paragraph: "Obama did not run for president to preside over the codification of a global war fought in secret. But that's his legacy. . . . Micah Zenko at the Council on Foreign Relations writes that Obama's predecessors in the Bush administration 'were actually much more conscious and thoughtful about the long-term implications of targeted killings', because they feared the political consequences that might come when the U.S. embraces something at least superficially similar to assassination. Whoever follows Obama in the Oval Office can thank him for proving those consequences don't meaningfully exist b as he or she reviews the backlog of names on the Disposition Matrix." It's worth devoting a moment to letting that sink in.

2 1

The Old Radical: How Bitcoin Is Being Destroyed
by Eugen Leitl 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

http://www.dgcmagazine.com/the-old-radical-how-bitcoin-is-being-destroyed/ The Old Radical: How Bitcoin Is Being Destroyed Posted on October 24, 2012 by Julia This piece was recently sent to me by b an old radical.b The message is perhaps a bit harsh, but I have to admit, all I can do is grimace and nod in agreement to this thesisb& b Bitcoin and state banking systems are born enemies: only one can survive. If you are imagining that they can peacefully coexist, you are fooling yourself.b I was a radical before most of you Bitcoin users were born. That doesnbt make me any better than you (hopefully I did a few things to make you better than myself), but it does give me a better perspective; time just works that way. Ibve been watching the recent developments in the Bitcoin markets, and having seen this drama before (too many times), I thought Ibd pass along a lesson. This will strike its target in some of you, but others of you are also likely to reject it, because it doesnbt match what you want to be true. Herebs the lesson: Trying to go blegitb will destroy the Bitcoin market. For those of you who havenbt turned away, Ibll explain: Therebs nothing really wrong with Bitcoin itself. The developers are doing a nice job of addressing its problems and a heartening number of people have jumped up to create new tools and new services. No problem here. The problem is that too many people in the Bitcoin market are thinking the old way. Understand this: Bitcoin is a new thing b it is not compatible with the old financial system. Bitcoin and state banking systems are born enemies: only one can survive. If you are imagining that they can peacefully coexist, you are fooling yourself. Bitcoin exposes the fraud that is state banking. If you think that politicians and bankers will calmly allow it to take over a significant percentage of world financial flows, youbre in denial. States will come after Bitcoin, and hard. They have no choice. Their money can only exist if there are no competitors. Alan Greenspan may have done a lot of bad things, but he is not stupid. And before his adventures at the Fed, he wrote this: (Under a fiat system), there is no way to protect savings from confiscation through inflationb& If there were, the government would have to make its holding illegal, as was done in the case of gold. What gold was then, Bitcoin is nowb& times five. So, let me try this again: Going legit gives the state a handle to grab you with. bLegitb means registered and regulated, doesnbt it? You have to tell them your name, where you live, and where you put your money, right? It means that they can control you whenever they want to. There are two big reasons why Bitcoin people are tempted to go blegitb: They want to get mega-rich fast, like Mark Zuckerberg. They have been trained to be obedient and canbt unlearn it. They are compelled to believe that the government is basically good. It must just be one bad politician or one bad law. #2 is what destroyed e-gold, and it looks like #1 is what killed GLBSE. Because of GLBSE, Bitcoin is now being regarded as a currency and states will start to regulate it as one. That means that theybll attack the public exchangers and force everyone possible to comply with their rules. Sob& itbs time to man-up, or to crumble. (Interestingly, there is often a larger percentage of women that b man-upb than men.) Will you have the guts to do the right thing when the pressure is on? If yes, I applaud and honor you. If not, here are a few cheap excuses to use (after all, who wants to admit conditioning or cowardice): Without the rule of law, everything would fall apart. Without regulation, criminals would destroy everything. Yes, regulation is coercive, but along with it comes a certain amount of public benefit! I got ripped off, and someone has to fix it! If I canbt sue someone, they can get away with ripping me off! We canbt get people to use Bitcoin unless itbs authorized. We need approval or we will forever remain a tiny market. A significant number of Bitcoin people will say these things (and others), but the real truth will be that they are scared, or are still hoping to get mega-rich, or just canbt rip the b government is our friendb meme out of their heads. But mostly it will be fear. We all feel fear of course, but some of us are determined enough to do the right thing, even when webre afraid. So, herebs a final tip: If you run into someone who can feel the fear and still do the right thing, donbt let go of them. O.R.

1 0

Bitcoin, Dollars and Pot-Banging Protests in Argentina.
by Eugen Leitl 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

https://thebluemarket.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/bitcoin-dollars-and-pot-bang… Bitcoin, Dollars and Pot-Banging Protests in Argentina. This post is a peep into the underground exchange markets for dollars and bitcoins in Argentina. For the last couple of weeks, I have experienced the informal exchange of bitcoin and dollars on first hand in Buenos Aires. Furthermore, I have realized how both locals and expats may reap significant gains by using bitcoins as a medium of exchange. Inflation and Monetary Restrictions Before we dive into the details of the underground markets in Argentina, let me try to paint the picture of the current economic situation in Argentina. For several years the Argentine inflation rate has been bumping around 25-30% per annum, according to figures published by independent institutions. The Argentine government doesnbt recognize the independent estimates and has allied with INDEC, the National Statistics Institute, to calculate inflation figures 2-3 times lower than the independent figures. The interesting fact is that the pesobs fixed exchange rate with the dollar is only taking into account INDECbs inflation rate of 8-12%, causing overvaluation of the peso by not incorporating the true higher inflation rate. INDEC is indeed a neat implementation of an Orwellian b Ministry of Truthb, and the magic calculations have raised concerns with IMF who is threatening to expel Argentina from the organization. Naturally the high inflation rate has caused capital flight out of Argentina, and every Argentine with a bit of savings is looking to exchange their pesos into something more secure. In order to stop the capital flight and fortify the central bankbs reserves, the government has implemented strict measures to prevent Argentines from obtaining foreign currencies. For example, only if you are travelling abroad are you allowed to exchange pesos for dollars legally, but there is a limit of 100$ per day abroad. Recently the government also imposed a 15% tax on all foreign credit card purchases, and a 50% custom duty on any goods which Argentines purchased abroad. Aside from the outrageous taxes, this legislation completely flashes your personal banking details to government officials, who can then snoop on your shopping list. Estimated 200.000 people in the Plaza de Mayo demonstrating against government policies. The complex regulatory environment has caused Paypal to suspend all domestic transactions in Argentina. Ebay and Amazon has followed suit with similar restrictions. The Blue Dollar In Argentina the dollar you care about is blue. The reason is that the difficulty for locals to acquire dollars through traditional means has fueled a secondary dollar exchange market. The unofficial exchange rate, known as the b blue dollar rateb, is approximately 25% higher than the official rate. For expats, itbs a no-brainer that you are being ripped-off by withdrawing cash at ATMs from established banks, where the withdrawal is conducted at the official exchange rate currently around $ARS 4.70 pesos per dollar. In comparison, if you exchange USD on the b blue marketb you get around $ARS 6.20 pesos per dollar. Luckily before travelling to Argentina, my girlfriend and I were tipped off to this news and carried along dollars in cash when entering the country. One can exchange dollars at the blue market rate simply by heading to Bs. Aires main shopping street, Calle Florida. Here lots of street vendors are drifting around advertising their business to anyone who looks like a potential customer. The street vendors here are known as arbolitos by locals. Arbolitos means b little treesb, a reference to the street vendors are full of b green leavesb. If you are looking to exchange dollars the street vendors will quickly approach you and provide a quote. If you accept the quote, you just head to a nearby jewelry or electronics shop and complete the transaction. Above approach is generally safe but I wasnbt too keen on exchanging dollars with street vendors. Instead I posted a small note on an online forum and got in contact with a couple living in Buenos Aires, who were eager to exchange dollars for pesos at the blue market rate. The snapshot below is the result of this exchange b and what an underground dollar market looks like. The Bitcoin Hero The dollars we brought into Argentina are soon running out, and we have been looking for alternatives to increase our dollar reserves. One approach is to cross the border to Uruguay b but you have the hassle of ATM withdrawal limits and the risk of travelling with lots of cash. There is also a service called Xoom, which allows you to transfer money from abroad to various pick-up locations in Bs. Aires. The magic of Xoom is that they somehow manage to provide the blue dollar exchange rate. Unfortunately they also require a US bank account to use its services. Another possibility is Bitcoin, a new electronic currency, which has been flourishing online for the last couple of years. In our situation Bitcoin has turned out to be a great vehicle to transfer money into Argentina and achieve the blue dollar exchange rate. I completed my first bitcoin to pesos transaction last week and gained 25% in comparison to the official exchange rate. The way it works is that you simply buy some bitcoins online through one of the many bitcoin exchanges. Mt.Gox is by far the largest but there are local alternatives as well, such as Bitcoin Nordic. Once you have your bitcoins you identify an Argentine who is on the market for bitcoins at the blue dollar rate. Given the economic situation there are lots of Argentines who are looking to get rid of pesos in exchange for other more secure assets. In my case I circulated a note to Eudemocraciabs bitcoin mailing list announcing that I was interested in selling bitcoins. The price I offered was the Mt.Gox USD price converted to pesos at the blue USD exchange rate. Based on the number of replies this was an attractive offer, and after some email correspondence, I agreed to meet up with one contact and conduct the transaction. After getting the agreed pesos in cash I made a one-click transfer of bitcoins to his online bitcoin wallet. A bitcoin transfer is instant and non reversible, and the picture below shows how we could confirm completion of the transaction on the spot. Because of the dollar restrictions and the escalating inflation the demand for bitcoins in Argentina is greater than our personal need for pesos. Therefore, if you are an expat or just travelling through I encourage you to explore bitcoin as an alternative to finance your stay. Not only will you get a 25% higher exchange rate but you will also help locals protect their savings from being hollowed by inflation. I believe the bitcoin adventure is just kicking off in Argentina. Also Ibm keen to see how the 200.000 Argentines demonstrating for libertad in the Plaza de Mayo might use bitcoin to fight the monetary restrictions themselves. Maybe itbs an even better approach than banging a pot?

1 0

НЕ ДОРОГАЯ Офсетная ПЕЧАТЬ
by "ТИПОГРАФИЯ ПРЕДЛАГАЕТ" 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

ТИПОГРАФИЯ ПРЕДЛАГАЕТ НЕ ДОРОГАЯ Офсетная ПЕЧАТЬ – Быстро, Качественно и в Максимально короткий срок.   ЖУРНАЛЫ, КАТАЛОГИ, БРОШЮРЫ, БУКЛЕТЫ, ЛИСТОВКИ ФЛАЕРЫ, ПАПКИ, КАЛЕНДАРИ КВАРТАЛЬНЫЕ, КАРМАННЫЕ и ДОМИКИ, ПОСТЕРЫ, ПЛАКАТЫ и АФИШЫ, ФИРМЕННЫЕ КОНВЕРТЫ, ПАКЕТЫ, ПЛАСТИКОВЫЕ КАРТЫ, ВИЗИТКИ на ДИЗАЙНЕРСКИХ БУМАГАХ, БАНЕРЫ, ШТЕНДЕРЫ и т. д. тел.: (495) 500-98-93

1 0

Срочно Продаю- Рабочие сайты по ремонту & бизнес Пластиковые карты
by "Алекс" 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

К названию сайтам добавить точку и RU вконце! remontkvartirmsk 40тр remontkvartirmoskva 20тр remontliftov - 1 место в яндексе (ремонт лифтов), отличный бренд, 30 тр golden-card 30тр Пластиковые карты К названию сайтам добавить точку и RU вконце! Сайтам более 2х лет – приносят заказы. Продаются вместе с красивыми доменными именами! Вам остается только поменять на сайте контакты на свои - телефон, разместить Ваши цены и начинать работать. Продается по номиналу, без торгов. Алекс 8-9-2-6 2-2-3 три пять ноль шесть скайп fastdolg

1 0

Просчет Вашего буклета
by "Типография" 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

Акция 25 октября: при заказе полиграфии на сумму от 15 000 руб и выше - 300 визиток или дизайн открытки в подарок! ОБЛАСТНАЯ ТИПОГРАФИЯ ГАРАНТИРУЕТ ЛУЧШИЕ ЦЕНЫ В РОССИИ на печать календарей, буклетов, каталогов, плакатов и др. тел.84955897612 (с 9 до 19.00) 84959407322 (с 9 до 20.00) - ВСЯ ПОЛИГРАФИЯ (кашированые изделия, плакаты, листовки, каталоги, брошюры...) - Доставка до заказчика бесплатно! - Печатаем форматом А1, А2, 4 - 5 красок, КБС, ВШРА, выборочный лак - полный спектр постпечатной обработки! - шоу-рум с образцами - Курская Просчитайте Ваши заказы в нашей Типографии! Почта: www.логотип-л.рф

1 0

Как защитить и скрыть владельца оффшора?
by Снизь налоги 25 Oct '12

25 Oct '12

К письму прилагается приложение

1 0