- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

JV Proposal
by webmaster 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

THIS BUSINESS LETTER IS INTENDED FOR WEBMASTER/ OWNER. Dear Sir: this mail is being sent only to a select few individuals. i wanted to share a business proposition of interest to BOTH OF US. as you read this mail, the servers running the registrations for the programme are being re-upgraded to even higher capacity (only a week since upgrading)!!! it's spreading like wildfire AND looks poised to set a new record. AND ALL THIS w/out any kind of ADVERTISING, PERIOD!!! IF YOU ARE EXCITED ABOUT THE FOLLOWING, THEN YOU ARE ONLY A CLICK AWAY FROM MAKING SOME REAL DECENT MONEY: a.. IF THE BIGGEST COMPLAINT THAT WEBMASTERS HAVE IS SOLVED(THAT OF NOT HAVING A PRODUCT THAT IS/ HAS TO BE USED BY CLOSE TO 95% OF ADULT US POPULATION); a.. IF THIS "ALWAYS/ EVERYWHERE" IN USE PRODUCT IS A FREE GIVEAWAY; a.. IF YOU AGREE THAT GETTING A TOP LEVEL VERY EARLY ON, IN A COMPANY'S 10 LEVEL DEEP MLM (ABOUT JUST WHEN ITS LAUNCHED), HELPS IMMENSELY TO HAVE THE DOWNLINE GO THRU THE ROOF; a.. IF ALL YOU HAVE TO DO IS JUST SEND A PERSONAL NOTE TO YOUR EXISTING ASSET (YOUR OPT-IN MAILLIST, COMPOSED OF DATABASE OF PEOPLE WHO WOULDN'T MIND RECEIVING A FREE GIFT FROM YOU THAT HELPS THEM TO MAKE A NEAT BUNDLE W/OUT SPENDING A DIME); then DO NOT WAIT ANYMORE!! click the link below to go the site that made me doubt the SIMPLICITY of it all, when it hit me between the eyes, as i read it for the first time. (the following link will redirect you straight to the offer page.) http:// safemail.netfirms.com this thing is INCREDIBLY CREDIBLE- major financial firms are backing it HEAVILY. (you'll be surprised of the products popularity with them!!) this is a godsend offer for all webmasters, web admins and listowners since they will NEVER be SELLING the product to their databases- just give away for FREE. the offer is 25 days old approx.- so its still FRESH, and YOU SHOULD REACH YOUR LIST BEFORE SOMEONE ELSE DOES. (i.e., someone already mails quite a few of them, if they are common contacts between you 2 guys- SINCE THIS IS SPREADING TOO FAST WITH JUST WORD OF MOUTH!!) thanx for your patient audience. don't you think it's a WIN WIN situation for all of us? click below NOW to CONFIRM the TRUTH yourself, about all that is stated here!! http:// safemail.netfirms.com the COMMISSIONS you can make thru your vast contacts are enormous! once you sign up, you may use the commission CALCULATOR online to figure out the math yourself!! thanx and best wishes. IF YOU RECEIVED THIS MAIL IN ERROR, IT IS SINCERELY REGRETTED.THIS IS A ONE-TIME TRANSMISSION. YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE ANYMORE MAIL OF THIS KIND IN THE FUTURE.

1 0

concerns
by Chris Kaihatsu 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

To: MSWiA (Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration) http://www.mswia.gov.pl e-mail: <wp(a)mswia.gov.pl> street: ul.St Batorego5 02-591 W-wa (Warsaw), Poland, Europe Min Lacznosci (Ministry of Communications) http://www.ml.gov.pl e-mail: <webmaster(a)ml.gov.pl> (webmaster) e-mail2: <rzecznik(a)ml.gov.pl> (spokesman) street: ul.Stawki2 00-990 W-wa (Warsaw), Poland, Europe Mr. Lacznosci: I am an experienced Internet user, and I enjoy the ease of communication that international email offers me. As with any of my communications, I like to believe that my messages go to the people I send them to, and not to people I don't. In other words, I believe that no agency or individual should be reading communications that are not addressed to them. Specifically, I am absolutely opposed to any use of wiretapping or surveillance, like the FBI's Carnivore or the EU's Echelon. Governments, specifically, must watch where they tread. Since government officials are paid with taxpayer money, they should be serving the public interest, which should _not_ include witch-hunts. If any government officials of yours has personal emotional problems like insecurity or paranoia, I hope they will be taken care of. We activists have found that when government officials do not deal with their emotional problems well the results can lead to paranoia. When agents become paranoid they begin looking for regular people to foist their own paranoia onto. Please make sure that no one employed by your government has any sort of problems which might cause them to restrict the communications of anyone else. I am certain that if you can address our concerns adequately there will be no need for any further measures on our part. Also, please do not forget that all surveillance projects initiated by governments are carefully monitored by NGOs like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (http://www.eff.org) the Global Internet Liberty Campaign (http://www.gilc.org) and libertarian organizations, such as Libertarian International (http://www.libertarian.to) Libertarian International Organization (http://www.libertarian.uni.cc) or The International Society for Individual Liberties (http://www.isil.org) Finally, we understand your concerns are in capturing "criminals". I would personally suggest that you take extreme care in deciding what methods are appropriate in your apprehension of "criminals". I'm certain you would not want to do anything that your population would find offensive. Thank you. Sincerely, Chris Kaihatsu Chicago, IL USA 312-789-8073 ckaihatsu(a)yahoo.com ************************************************************************** Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: freematt(a)coil.com with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per month) Matthew Gaylor, 2175 Bayfield Drive, Columbus, OH 43229 (614) 313-5722 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/ **************************************************************************

1 0

concerns
by Chris Kaihatsu 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

To: MSWiA (Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration) http://www.mswia.gov.pl e-mail: <wp(a)mswia.gov.pl> street: ul.St Batorego5 02-591 W-wa (Warsaw), Poland, Europe Min Lacznosci (Ministry of Communications) http://www.ml.gov.pl e-mail: <webmaster(a)ml.gov.pl> (webmaster) e-mail2: <rzecznik(a)ml.gov.pl> (spokesman) street: ul.Stawki2 00-990 W-wa (Warsaw), Poland, Europe Mr. Lacznosci: I am an experienced Internet user, and I enjoy the ease of communication that international email offers me. As with any of my communications, I like to believe that my messages go to the people I send them to, and not to people I don't. In other words, I believe that no agency or individual should be reading communications that are not addressed to them. Specifically, I am absolutely opposed to any use of wiretapping or surveillance, like the FBI's Carnivore or the EU's Echelon. Governments, specifically, must watch where they tread. Since government officials are paid with taxpayer money, they should be serving the public interest, which should _not_ include witch-hunts. If any government officials of yours has personal emotional problems like insecurity or paranoia, I hope they will be taken care of. We activists have found that when government officials do not deal with their emotional problems well the results can lead to paranoia. When agents become paranoid they begin looking for regular people to foist their own paranoia onto. Please make sure that no one employed by your government has any sort of problems which might cause them to restrict the communications of anyone else. I am certain that if you can address our concerns adequately there will be no need for any further measures on our part. Also, please do not forget that all surveillance projects initiated by governments are carefully monitored by NGOs like the Electronic Frontier Foundation (http://www.eff.org) the Global Internet Liberty Campaign (http://www.gilc.org) and libertarian organizations, such as Libertarian International (http://www.libertarian.to) Libertarian International Organization (http://www.libertarian.uni.cc) or The International Society for Individual Liberties (http://www.isil.org) Finally, we understand your concerns are in capturing "criminals". I would personally suggest that you take extreme care in deciding what methods are appropriate in your apprehension of "criminals". I'm certain you would not want to do anything that your population would find offensive. Thank you. Sincerely, Chris Kaihatsu Chicago, IL USA 312-789-8073 ckaihatsu(a)yahoo.com ************************************************************************** Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: freematt(a)coil.com with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per month) Matthew Gaylor, 2175 Bayfield Drive, Columbus, OH 43229 (614) 313-5722 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/ **************************************************************************

1 0

Swatch@Giganetstore.com
by info＠giganetstore.com 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

Caro(a) Cliente, A Swatch voltou com novos modelos à Giganetstore.com <http://www.giganetstore.com/> Já está disponível o relógio do Dia dos Namorados <http://www.giganetstore.com/dynamic/promotions/mails/swatch_amour..htm> e a colecção Square. <http://www.giganetstore.com/dynamic/promotions/mails/swatch_square.htm> Um conselho, visite as páginas dedicadas a estes novos modelos. Amour Total Para o Dia dos Namorados, a Swatch trouxe-nos "Amour Total " <http://www.giganetstore.com/products/product.asp?channelId=0&CategoryId =0&subCategory=0&ProductId=9796> , que expressa num relógio as numerosas formas de manifestações que o amor pode ter. É tempo de amor e o dia de S. Valentim está aí, com toda a sua parte de boas intenções, flores, joias, todo o tipo de prendas e poemas. Se pretender visualizar esta informação numa página do seu browser em formato HTML, basta clicar aqui <http://www.giganetstore.com/dynamic/promotions/mails/swatch_amour..htm> . Não sejas tão Quadrado! Porque todos os povos são diferentes, a Swatch desenhou a colecção Square em dois tamanhos. Os de 5 cm para aqueles que gostam de coisas ligeiramente maiores e os de 3 cm para aqueles que gostam de coisas mais pequenas. Porque a Swatch acredita que o tamanho é importante! Don't Be Too Square <http://www.giganetstore.com/products/product.asp?channelId=0&CategoryId =0&subCategory=0&ProductId=9789> Typical Square <http://www.giganetstore.com/products/product.asp?channelId=0&CategoryId =0&subCategory=0&ProductId=9795> Satisfaction <http://www.giganetstore.com/products/product.asp?channelId=0&CategoryId =0&subCategory=0&ProductId=9790> Subliminal <http://www.giganetstore.com/products/product.asp?channelId=0&CategoryId =0&subCategory=0&ProductId=9793> Se pretender visualizar esta informação numa página do seu browser em formato HTML, basta clicar aqui <http://www.giganetstore.com/dynamic/promotions/mails/swatch_square.htm> . Para retirar o seu email desta mailing list deverá entrar no nosso site giganetstore.com <http://www.giganetstore.com/> , ir à edição do seu registo e retirar a opção de receber informação acerca das nossas promoções e novos serviços.

1 0

O'Reilly Network: Code + Law: An Interview with Lawrence Lessig [Jan. 29, 2001]
by Jim Choate 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/p2p/2001/01/30/lessig.html -- ____________________________________________________________________ Before a larger group can see the virtue of an idea, a smaller group must first understand it. "Stranger Suns" George Zebrowski The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

4 3

Libertarian Futurist Society Announces First National Conference
by Matthew Gaylor 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

1 0

Re: The Register - There are still crypto reg's...
by mmotyka＠lsil.com 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

If Apple really wanted to enable crypto plug-ins they would isolate and open source that part of the OS where plug-in capability should be added then publish a spec for the modified API. It would get done. Mike

1 0

Poland: Letter to MSWiA Over Net Freedom
by Matthew Gaylor 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

1 0

Dilfer thanks who?
by freebie＠grabmail.com 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

1 0

Foes of privacy bills in Congress try new approach: Federalism
by Declan McCullagh 01 Feb '01

01 Feb '01

Bruce Kobayashi and Larry Ribstein photo: http://www.mccullagh.org/image/950-19/larry-ribstein-bruce-kobayashi.html Their paper, A State Recipe for Cookies: State Regulation of Consumer Marketing Information: http://www.federalismproject.org/conlaw/ecommerce/cookies.html ********* http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,41511,00.html Should States Regulate Privacy? by Declan McCullagh (declan(a)wired.com) 2:00 a.m. Feb. 1, 2001 PST ARLINGTON, Virginia -- Larry Ribstein and Bruce Kobayashi are nothing if not ambitious: They hope to reshape the way Washington thinks about privacy. Even though many observers of Capitol Hill assume the new Congress will approve regulations aimed at Internet firms, the two George Mason University law professors are betting that legislators can be persuaded to try a more laissez-faire approach. Instead of the Senate and the House enacting laws, they argue in a paper published this week, state legislatures should be making the decisions. Says Ribstein: "Federal law hasn't turned out to be a salvation in other areas." Their efforts are part of a nascent -- although fast-growing -- effort by conservatives and libertarians to target online privacy laws using many of the same tools, strategies, and alliances they've used to battle federal environmental, education, and gun regulations in the past. On Tuesday, the American Enterprise Institute's Federalism Project convened an invitation-only roundtable where Kobayashi and Ribstein presented their paper to an influential audience that included former OECD ambassador David Aaron, Yale law professor Roberta Romano, Michael Quaranta of Experian, and Bill Niskanen, chairman of the Cato Institute. AEI's Federalism Project argues that the U.S. national government is an institution that has usurped powers not delegated to it in the Constitution -- those powers should rightfully be reserved for states. One 1995 case is a favorite: U.S. v. Lopez, in which the Supreme Court overturned a federal gun law by ruling it "exceeds Congress' Commerce Clause authority." [...] Their 43-page paper says: "Federal law would perversely lock in a single regulatory framework while Internet technology is still rapidly evolving. State law, by contrast, emerges from 51 laboratories (50 states, plus the District of Columbia) and therefore presents a more decentralized model that fits the evolving nature of the Internet." They predict that some states will impose more regulations than others -- by, for example, trying different approaches to mandating disclosure of privacy practices. [...]

1 0