- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Nude, FREE, Live AMATEURS!!!!!!
by LiveJennyNUDEXXX＠aol.com 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (LiveJennyNUDEXXX(a)aol.com) on Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 20:42:07 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- message: <BR><BR>This is the NEWEST and HOTTEST released site on the internet. This site contains nothing but what YOU want to see. This site is so HARDCORE, and there are plenty different subsites to choose from. These sites include ORAL, GAY, DOMINATION, SUBMISSION, BONDAGE, ANAL, and plenty more!!!!!!!.<a href="http://refer.ccbill.com/cgi-bin/clicks.cgi?CA=905843&PA=108327">Click Here</a> for a look at this extreme hardcore site. Remember there is ABSOLUTELY NO obligation for visiting this site, but we GUARANTEE satisfaction. There are plenty of sites to choose from and we promise you will enjoy each and every one of them!!! Go ahead and take a look at what we have to offer!!!!! No other site comes close to offering what we have now put out for you, ENJOY, and feel free to foward this to your friends. Have a great day, and have fun!!!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Nude, FREE, Live AMATEURS!!!!!!
by LiveJennyNUDEXXX＠aol.com 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by (LiveJennyNUDEXXX(a)aol.com) on Tuesday, March 20, 2001 at 20:41:28 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- message: <BR><BR>This is the NEWEST and HOTTEST released site on the internet. This site contains nothing but what YOU want to see. This site is so HARDCORE, and there are plenty different subsites to choose from. These sites include ORAL, GAY, DOMINATION, SUBMISSION, BONDAGE, ANAL, and plenty more!!!!!!!.<a href="http://refer.ccbill.com/cgi-bin/clicks.cgi?CA=905843&PA=108327">Click Here</a> for a look at this extreme hardcore site. Remember there is ABSOLUTELY NO obligation for visiting this site, but we GUARANTEE satisfaction. There are plenty of sites to choose from and we promise you will enjoy each and every one of them!!! Go ahead and take a look at what we have to offer!!!!! No other site comes close to offering what we have now put out for you, ENJOY, and feel free to foward this to your friends. Have a great day, and have fun!!!!! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

RE: Did you notice
by Ray Dillinger 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

On Tue, 20 Mar 2001, Trei, Peter wrote: >Ken: > >I'm sure the apparent discounting of the US murder rate by some American >list members seems inexplicable to you. At the risk of being extremely >non-PC, I think I can explain why. > >The distribution of murders in the US is very heavily skewed towards >groups which are unlikely to be on the list, or acquainted to people >on the list. In short, there is a large disparity in the murder rates for >white, educated professionals (who make up most the membership of >this list) vs poor blacks or latinos. This is true. There's a huge disparity between what I see now and what I saw when I was really poor and had no degree. >If you look at the murder rate for white middle/upper class folk, you'll >find its >quite comparable to Britain and other European countries. No person >I have ever known personally has fallen to murder, a statement which >I expect could be made by most the American posters to this list. I can't say that for sure... I have had a friend from high school killed in what was later called an accident in a court of law. But I think it's at least fifty percent likely that the court was wrong, or applying the standard of a "reasonable doubt" in a case where there wasn't enough solid evidence for a conviction. But I have had several people I've been close to die for some reason other than natural causes. Mostly they just made mistakes with heavy machinery. Mistakes with guns, by contrast, are mostly non- fatal. People who did that blew off a few toes or messed up a hand or got some birdshot in their leg off a ricochet or something. Note that reputation is alive in that society; if it becomes known that you have made mistakes with guns, you are likely to find that no one wants to be your friend because you're likely to die or kill one of your friends accidentally. So it is often regarded as a shameful secret, and often people with minor gun wounds (such as a few pellets of birdshot from a ricochet) don't seek treatment for fear of the embarassment. As Peter says, now that I live in the world of "educated professionals" such things simply don't happen to the people I know today. >While it's sad that people don't factor in the societal risks borne by >'other groups' in this country, it's just human nature. In a grim fascinating way, it's just efficient use of human lives as a resource in capital production. Those who have the money, and hence the power, are the ones who've most efficiently used their lives to produce capital. Most of them have made most of their production by causing others to be marginally more efficient under their management, but the principle is sound. They are protected, reflexively, by the organism of a human society and the very 'human nature' that you just mentioned. If they were not so protected, we would probably be a lot less efficient at producing functioning societies. This is because we can't afford the loss of those who understand how to produce capital. And we can't afford to protect all people as well as that group is protected. I do not claim that this is good, but as the pygmies say, "Eyali djamba. Njamba, eyaliboye." Roughly translated, "That's the jungle. That's the way it is." And folks, the poor people, the ones who stop to think about it anyway, they know the score. They know that nobody's going to have heads of state come to their funerals, or write books about what they have to say, or erect monuments when they die, and when they think about it, they know why. If you don't have wealth, you have no proof that you've earned the right to matter. There are billions of them and they know damn well that as far as the people who matter are concerned any one of them can replace any other. As someone from a family that lived well below the poverty line the whole time I was growing up, I can report that that much gets drilled into you in a thousand ways as a child and understanding it and accepting it is a large part of what it means, among poor folk, to be an adult. Bear (who has relatives that still think of him as childish, stubborn, and pigheaded for trying to reach a different place in the grand scheme of things...)

1 0

RE: Did you notice
by Trei, Peter 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

> ---------- > From: Reese[SMTP:reeza@flex.com] > Reply To: Reese > Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 8:05 PM > To: cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net > Subject: Re: Did you notice > > At 10:20 AM 3/19/01 +0000, Ken Brown wrote: > >Reese wrote: > > > >> England serves as a fine example here; > > > >I'm sure it does, but of what? > > Crime rates. > > >I think the murder rate in Britain is about 1/6 of what it is in the > >USA. (I mean rate, not actual numbers, this is not a 28% paternity > >error). And the proportion of people killed accidentally is far lower > >here as well. We are perhaps a fine example of finding ways to live > >longer? > > Peter Trei just posted a url to an Economist story, and THIS, lists just > about everything BUT murder: > http://itn.co.uk/news/20010116/britain/06crime.shtml - so what's the rest > of the story? > > Reese > Well, you could try http://www.guncite.com/gun_control_gcgvintl.html While this is on a page advocating gun ownership, the statistics cited are from non-partisan sources. For some breakdown of US homicides by race, try http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a39235bd43dd9.htm once again, this is a partisan page, but the stats straight from the US Gov. (http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/homtrnd.htm) This suggests that the US murder rate for whites is about 3 per 100,000, vs 1.41 (total) for England/Wales Only about 15% of murders in the US are by strangers, so if you don't feel that your relatives and acquaintences are particularly likely to bump you off, the murder rate you worry about ("How likely am *I* to be killed today?") is very, very low. Even if it's double the UK rate, doubling a very low number gives you another very low number. Doesn't anyone besides myself know how to use a search engine, or check numbers before posting? Peter Trei

1 0

Slashdot | Is The Net Revolution Breaking Faith?
by Jim Choate 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

http://slashdot.org/features/01/03/11/1914245.shtml -- The Laws of Serendipity: 1. In order to discover anything, you must be looking for something. 2. If you wish to make an improved product, you must first be engaged in making an inferior one. Tivoli Certification Group, OSCT James Choate jchoate(a)tivoli.com Senior Engineer 512-436-1062

1 0

RE: Did you notice
by Trei, Peter 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

> Ken Brown[SMTP:k.brown@ccs.bbk.ac.uk] > Jim Dixon wrote: > > If anyone cares, the interpersonal violence rate is considerably > > higher in the UK. Recent statisics on crime in industrialised > > countries (and therefore excluding South Africa) showed Australia > > leading the world and the UK second. America trailed far behind. > > Of course - that's the point. Brits are no less violent than USAns, no > less likely to be criminal, no more polite or neighbourly (in fact > rather less). But we are *far* less likely to be killed or seriously > injured by our neighbours, or by the State. And part of the reason for > that is that "normal" people don't have guns in Britain. > > Ken (still really not wanting to restart the Great Permanent Floating > Internet Gun Rant) > Ken: I'm sure the apparent discounting of the US murder rate by some American list members seems inexplicable to you. At the risk of being extremely non-PC, I think I can explain why. The distribution of murders in the US is very heavily skewed towards groups which are unlikely to be on the list, or acquainted to people on the list. In short, there is a large disparity in the murder rates for white, educated professionals (who make up most the membership of this list) vs poor blacks or latinos. If you look at the murder rate for white middle/upper class folk, you'll find its quite comparable to Britain and other European countries. No person I have ever known personally has fallen to murder, a statement which I expect could be made by most the American posters to this list. While it's sad that people don't factor in the societal risks borne by 'other groups' in this country, it's just human nature. Peter Trei

1 0

Super Fast Online Browsing!
by janis＠mail.thebestplace.org 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

1 0

Democratic 'critters want Bush to continue with med priv reg
by Declan McCullagh 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

HEALTH News conference to urge Health and Human Services Secretary Tommy Thompson to proceed with prompt implementation of the HHS Medical Privacy Regulation. Participants: Sen. Edward Kennedy, D-Mass.; Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt.; Rep. John Dingell, D-Mich.; Rep. Edward Markey, D-Mass.; Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., and Chris Koyangi, Mental Health Liaison Group Location: 2168 Rayburn House Office Building. 11:30 a.m. Contact: Jim Manley, 202-224-2633 or David Moulton, 202-225-2836

1 0

Mercury News publisher steps down - Mar. 20, 2001 (Ok, all journalists may not be whores)
by Jim Choate 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

http://cnnfn.cnn.com/2001/03/20/news/wires/mercurynews_wg/ -- ____________________________________________________________________ If the law is based on precedence, why is the Constitution not the final precedence since it's the primary authority? The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Gun activists have a stake against censorware
by Seth Finkelstein 20 Mar '01

20 Mar '01

[Feel free to forward to your list] As you know, the groups ACLU/ALA/PFAW will be filing a lawsuit against the Federal censorware law (CIPA). It's important to understand that the reach of censorware extends to far more than sex. Anyone who can be the target of a secret blacklist has a stake. As a small illustration, a quick check shows the censorware program SmartFilter blacklists many gun-related sites under the category of "Criminal Skills": http://www.gun-room.com http://www.gungarage.com http://www.gun-tests.com http://www.guns.com http://www.gunsamerica.com http://www.ncggasgun.com http://www.championfirearms.com http://www.springfield-armory.com And http://www.ayoob.com is considered "Extreme" (that's akin to obscene) These can be verified by testing the URLs using the web-form at http://www.securecomputing.com/cgi-bin/filter_whereV3.cgi [It would be a good idea to do such a check before you send out this message, because the blacklist may be changed after this is publicized] __ Seth Finkelstein Consulting Programmer sethf(a)sethf.com http://sethf.com EFF Pioneer: http://www.eff.org/awards/20010305_pioneer_press_release.html Anticensorware Investigations: http://sethf.com/anticensorware/ ************************************************************************** Subscribe to Freematt's Alerts: Pro-Individual Rights Issues Send a blank message to: freematt(a)coil.com with the words subscribe FA on the subject line. List is private and moderated (7-30 messages per week) Matthew Gaylor, 2175 Bayfield Drive, Columbus, OH 43229 (614) 313-5722 ICQ: 106212065 Archived at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/fa/ **************************************************************************

1 0