- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

e-mail confirmation #63814291
by julie14291＠freevibrator.com 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

This is a confirmation e-mail for your request. You can come anytime and claim your FREE Sex Toys at http://www.freevibrator.com All Free Sex Toys we feature are absolutly free with no purchase necessary whatsoever. (Small reasonable shipping charges apply) Thank You for subscribing to FreeSexToys updates list. This Is OPT-IN list. To make sure that we won't send anything to you in ERROR - You HAVE TO CONFIRM that you would like to be added to our list. To confirm that you want to be added send e-mail to: add(a)freevibrator.com If you received this e-mail in error (my apologies) or do not wish to be added to our list DO NOTHING. You will NOT be added to our list without Your Confirmation. Freely Yours Julie Aston Julie(a)freevibrator.com message confirmation ID#1210763814291105787702800

1 0

Lose 10 pounds in one week, GUARANTEED!
by Trim Life 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

FREE SAMPLE! World famous TrimLife weight-loss tablets! Lose up to 10 pounds in 1 week with measurable results in just 2 days...GUARANTEED! http://www.myaffiliateprogram.com/u/trimlife/t.asp?id=1216 Scientists have developed a breakthrough weight loss program that "tricks" your body into burning existing fat! It blocks new fat from settling in your body, and controls your hunger! Plus, it will increase your energy without the "jitters or sleepless nights". In fact, we're so sure you'll lose weight that if you pay the $1 for shipping, just to show you're serious, we'll send you a FREE 7 day sample! FREE BONUS To insure your success our online personal licensed weight-loss counselors will work with you every day, every step of the way! Shed those extra pounds! http://www.myaffiliateprogram.com/u/trimlife/t.asp?id=1216 To remove yourself from this list, simply reply to this email with the word "REMOVE" in the subject line.

1 0

Validation of BIGMAMA.GOD Domain
by The dot.GOD Registry, Limited 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

Hello: This email will confirm that we have processed your domain registration request for: BIGMAMA.GOD. Someone, hopefully you, has registered this domain with us. If not please let us know. You must now visit our web site to validate your domain and enter your validation ticket number. TICKET: 8694bebe899642174499 Please click on the following URL to activate your new domain name now. https://secure.dot-god.com/god.nic/validate.cgi?bigmama=8694bebe899642174499 Or if the above URL does not work (some email systems may crop the URL) then please visit: https://secure.dot-god.com/cgi-bin/validate.cgi and enter the following information manually at the prompt: DOMAIN: bigmama TICKET: 8694bebe899642174499 Regards hostmaster(a)dot-god.com http://www.dot-god.com/ The dot.GOD Registry, Limited Executive Plaza, Suite 908 150 West 51st Sreet New York, New York, 10019 US

1 0

Validation of BAZOOKA.GOD Domain
by The dot.GOD Registry, Limited 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

Hello: This email will confirm that we have processed your domain registration request for: BAZOOKA.GOD. Someone, hopefully you, has registered this domain with us. If not please let us know. You must now visit our web site to validate your domain and enter your validation ticket number. TICKET: 8575abcbe99642177301 Please click on the following URL to activate your new domain name now. https://secure.dot-god.com/god.nic/validate.cgi?bazooka=8575abcbe99642177301 Or if the above URL does not work (some email systems may crop the URL) then please visit: https://secure.dot-god.com/cgi-bin/validate.cgi and enter the following information manually at the prompt: DOMAIN: bazooka TICKET: 8575abcbe99642177301 Regards hostmaster(a)dot-god.com http://www.dot-god.com/ The dot.GOD Registry, Limited Executive Plaza, Suite 908 150 West 51st Sreet New York, New York, 10019 US

1 0

Business wants a new, profitable internet
by Jim Choate 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

Yep, the root of all evil is 'government', unrestrained economic trade will save us all...not http://slashdot.org/yro/01/07/26/1553257.shtml James Choate Product Certification - Operating Systems Staff Engineer 512-436-1062 jchoate(a)tivoli.com

6 5

Salon: The real enemies of the poor
by Faustine 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

Salon: The real enemies of the poor On Wed, 25 Jul 2001, Faustine wrote: > What about the idea of "reputation capital" you people are always going >on about, my prior knowledge of a couple of the authors makes me certain >they wouldn't dream of putting their name on sloppy work... >I'm not one of those 'you people'. Arguments from authority are of no >worth. Past performance is not a reliable metric for future performance. >The ends never justify the means, each step must self-justify. What argument from authority? Barring the sudden onset of senility or insanity, familiarity with past work gives you a general indication of whether or not you want to read something. Even reading this list, I'm sure there are people you read first and people you skip totally...And how likely is it that the first 15 essays are excellent but they saved the crappy ones for 16 on? ha! True story: several months ago I went as a "fly on the wall" to a roundtable-type meeting, sort of a gathering of the experts to discuss an issue. As the meeting went on, I noticed one man totally rose to the occasion and dominated the entire conversation: he knew the subject better than absolutely anyone there, and countered every objection with a dissection of such wit and precision he pretty much annihilated them. Even more impressive, while the others were as arrogant, blustering and pompous as you might expect, he was incredibly soft spoken and did it all without even raising his voice once: the very archetype of cool, quick, impartiality. Incredible! When I left the meeting, I had no idea who this amazing old wizard was or the slightest thing about his background--just that it was worth it to find out and read his research. All I'm saying is that his background credentials and published work was every bit as impressive the performance at the meeting...and that one of his essays is on the list. :) Now with a backstory like that, you actually mean to tell me I don't have a good reason to look forward to reading it? HA! > >I strongly want global trade and cultural exchange. I do not want global > >government or corporate enterprise. > You mean global corporate enterprise, or corporate enterprise at all? >Actually both. The 1870 law which created the modern monster of a >'corporation' should be thrown out. Replaced with what, though. That's the hard part. > Corporations, and other business organizations, should be able to sell to >their like type across the >relevant 'big pond'. A corporation should not be able to exist in two >different countries as a single organization. So the answer is to break them up and create more paperwork and bureacracy? Even if your last point is the "right answer" in theory, I don't see how the implementation of it would get you the results you're after, in terms of effects on society. > >I want direct interaction of business in government to be prohibited. > How? Any solution I can think of has the potential to be more problematic > than the problem itself. >So what solution(s) have you thought of? Quid pro Quo... The obvious first step would be to limit government to its constitutionally proscribed role: get them out of activities best left to the private sector. But without the incentives for a thriving nonprofit sector in place (yes, 501(c)(3)s are international corporations too), it can't happen in a way people could be comfortable with enough to accept. Nonprofits are the key to creating a civil society, and in my opinion it's a huge mistake to ignore their role in taking over services that the private sector can't or won't. How could voluntary collective action be anything BUT good..? Oh well. >Business is an expression of individual rights. Business should not be >able to contribute in any way to the democratic process (there is a reason >that business/commerce is mentioned the way it is in the Constitution... Realistically speaking, even if the entire US government collapsed tomorrow and you had "complete anarchy", it wouldn't be complete because large corporations have enough capital, resources, and sufficient organization to stay together to the point that they could maintain some semblance of order in their local area. Look at the way the oil companies function in Africa; look at the way drug cartels (an international business operation if ever there was one) influence policy in Columbia. Not that there's anything good or desirable about it--it's just that Joe Blow the Democracy Advocate doesn't have the slightest bit of influence over them one way or the other, government or not. So given that, you're faced with the prospect of massive legislation as the only alternative. That doesn't seem too promising either. >An observation that is sure to piss some C-A-C-L's off, but the reality is >that in 'free market' economics ala Hayek or Von Mises the potential for >'Bill Gates' wealth is nil. A 'free market' system isn't about getting >filthy rich. It's about participating in a 'community'. Unfortunately, this involves a confusion between capitalism and democracy. But unlike you, I don't think there's any contradiction in being pro-free market and anti-consumptionism. I hate the idea that so many people seem to think accumulating material goods is an acceptable substitute for an inner life. But just because I choose to live simply and don't drive in favor of commuting, recycle, etc. doesn't give me the right to demand others do the same. >Bottom line, the world is the way it is because people make it that way. >It is not an inviolate law of nature (or if you accept that then some >other precepts become questionable; free will, rational, responsible, >pre-meditation, etc. ). But the examples I gave above point to the idea that pure democratic anarchy is every bit as bound to fail as the ideal of pure democratic communism was (what's the real difference, when you think about it?) precisely because of the way people tend to make things, given the chance. What's to keep the strong and clever from ganging up on the weak and stupid? The amoral from ripping off the principled and pious? Anywhere, ever? The Constitution and the rule of law is the best chance we have... ~Faustine.

2 1

OPT: Re: Open 802.11b wireless access points and remailers (fwd)
by Jim Choate 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

"Small World" network models resolve almost all of these issues...the failure with all these models is the concept of 'root' (or more generaly 'heirarchy'). It's not needed. ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2001 01:52:53 -0400 (EDT) From: dmolnar <dmolnar(a)hcs.harvard.edu> Reply-To: cypherpunks(a)ssz.com To: gbroiles(a)speakeasy.org Cc: cypherpunks(a)lne.com Subject: CDR: Re: Open 802.11b wireless access points and remailers On Tue, 24 Jul 2001 gbroiles(a)speakeasy.org wrote: > forbidden emails or browse hidden sites did that by going to public > terminals in libraries or web cafes or [...] - now perhaps they'll do that > at Starbucks or the mall, either for free or having paid cash for > short-term access via 802.11b wireless. I heard recently that Starbucks is piloting 802.11b access in selected Manhattan locations. The issue is support, of course - they need to see if they'll have to hire a sysadmin for every Starbucks before rolling it out. I haven't taken my laptop and tried to verify this yet. Matthew Skala had some material on his web page concerning "community wireless" networks, as well, in which people offer free wireless connectivity as a public service. Presumably this too would offer opportunities for anonymous net access. I would be less willing to trust a static box connected to one of these networks, though. Once identified as a remailer, it seems that it might be too easy to track it to its physical location, at which point it can be borged or destroyed. After all, if it's going to be an active remailer, it will be sending and receiving several messages each day. You might try to get around this by developing a protocol in which there are many, many remailers, each of which only speaks once in a very long while. I don't know how easy or hard it is exactly to do this kind of tracking, however, which makes it difficult to say what such a protocol would look like. Perhaps mobile remailers might be more useful or more difficult to track to their physical implementation. The only problem with a mobile remailer is the question of "who's moving it?" (or what). I can imagine a mobile remailer the size of a Walkman without too much difficulty; I can also imagine that if I were to wear such a remailer and walk around in the wrong kind of environment, I'd be asking for a "mugging." or worse. Now that I think about it, it's not clear that wireless actually buys us more than obscurity of physical location. The real win, as you point out, is ease of access and ease of setup. Maybe less dependence on upstream connections, as well, so you can get around the problem of ISPs shutting down remailers for spam. Plus mobile remailers seem to require either a global address space or developing the notion of remailer confederations which allow dynamic leave and join of remailer nodes. I recall that the notion of dynamic collections of remailers came up in at least one previous discussion of disposable remailers. I don't remember that too many conclusions were reached, but it was a while abck. One problem is that an adversary can show up with polynomially many of its closest friends and have them all try to join a remailer confederation at once. While the MIX protocol is theoretically OK as long as even one MIX is honest, this may have bad implications for traffic analysis. Perhaps one thing we could do would be to borrow Levien's advogato metric. Let anyone who wants to start a remailer confederation. They form the root set of the trust metric for that confederation. Anyone can join the confederation's address space, but will start out with no trust links between them and the root set. Nodes can rate each other, establishing trust links. This way you can develop a trust metric / reputation system local to that particular remailer confederation. Now the issues are how the ratings are set up and maybe more important, how routing of messages is influenced by the trust metric. Ratings could be manual. We know how well that works from the PGP web of trust experiment - and here life is harder since remops usually will not know each other personally nor want to. Another issue is dealing with nodes which leave the confederation. What if all the confederation founders leave? what happens to the root set then? Also, building up trust may require time, which makes this unsuitable for nodes which want to pop in for 20 ins and then leave (say their owner is on the freeway). -David -- ____________________________________________________________________ Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night: God said, "Let Tesla be", and all was light. B.A. Behrend The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Re: Open 802.11b wireless access points and remailers
by David Honig 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

At 09:19 PM 7/26/01 +0300, Sampo Syreeni wrote: >On Thu, 26 Jul 2001, Ray Dillinger wrote: > >>Problem: if each soldier's radio relays messages, it becomes >>relatively easy to create a soldier-seeking bullet. Just home >>in on the source of that radio noise, and blam. > >Hence, LPI. Spread-spectrum, UWB, directed transmissions in the high >microwave bands, and so on. Dunno how useful the latter are for portable >equipment, though, or in the battlefield conditions. Bear has a point; no matter how you spread or hop, you're an emitter. Shoot anything that radiates from 50 Mhz-IR.

3 2

Guardian Unlimited Observer | International | Bush plans 'space bomber'
by Jim Choate 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

http://www.observer.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,529208,00.html -- -- ____________________________________________________________________ Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night: God said, "Let Tesla be", and all was light. B.A. Behrend The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Debunking the Myth of a Desperate Software Labor Shortage
by Jim Choate 29 Jul '01

29 Jul '01

http://heather.cs.ucdavis.edu/itaa.real.html -- -- ____________________________________________________________________ Nature and Nature's laws lay hid in night: God said, "Let Tesla be", and all was light. B.A. Behrend The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0