- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

JULY SPECIAL OFFERS: Videocassette $2.95 Each
by 100free＠cgispy.com 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

JULY SPECIAL OFFERS: XXX Videocassette $2.95 Each >From http://100free.coolfreehost.com/ goto http://www.1stfreexxx.com ------------------------------- Get Your Own Free Mailing List! http://www.cgispy.com

1 0

New Branche of Medicine
by Medicine Horizons 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

MEDICINE HORIZONS - newsletter Integration of Ancient Wisdom and Modern Scientific Technologies Leading to a New Branch of Medicine No innovation has gained such a fast foothold and recognition among medical experts as the utilisation of the natural laws of harmony. When one considers that the term Medical Resonance Therapy Music was only coined 14 years ago, and then looks at the present level of documentation on research and developments in this new branch of medicine, and the statements of leading medical experts from many fields such as hormone research, gynaecology, paediatrics, dermatology, research into headaches, intensive care medicine etc. right up to international recognition as the most successful "anti-stress remedy in the world" at the International Conference "Society, Stress and Health" of the World Health Organisation (WHO), then it is also worthwhile examining the causes for such enormous medical success more closely. Interesting links: Medical Resonance Therapy Music http://www.medicalresonancetherapymusic.com Scientific Music Therapy - Research http://www.scientificmusictherapy.com Music as Data Carrier of the Laws of Harmony Nature´s Laws of Harmony in the Microcosm of Music Chronobiological Aspects of Music Physiology International Experts http://www.digipharm.com Micro Music Laboratories http://www.micromusiclaboratories.com MEDICINE HORIZONS http://www.medicinehorizons.com p.s.: this message was sent to you in the genuine belief that it is of professional interest to you. If you do not want to receive further information please simply send us an email: mailto:remove@medicinehorizons.com

1 0

BUSINESS PROPOSAL
by fidelis aloye 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

> FROM: MR.FIDELIS ALOYE. > TEL: 234 1 759 1549; FAX: 234 1 759 0379. > E-MAIL:aloyede@yahoo.com > > > BUSINESS PROPOSAL > > ATTN: PRESIDENT/CEO, > > My name is FIDELIS ALOYE, a member of the > Presidential > Task Force on Oil Spillage Clean-up. Early last year > there was a major oil spillage in the Niger Delta > Region of Nigeria which rendered over 70% of the > communities homeless.The contract was handled by a > foreign firm but because of the huge monetary profit > we envisaged we decided to over-invoice the contract > sum. > > Now the contract has been completed and the original > contractor has since been paid,but the contract > balance of US$38 million,which resulted from the > over > invoiced contract sum that has been left in a > suspense > account with the CENTRAL BANK of NIGERIA,is what me > and my partners are planning to take out of the > country for ourselves.The problem is as government > officials,we are not suppose to own fat bank > accounts,talk less of having foreign ones. > > To this end, we are soliciting your assistance as a > foreign partner who can assist us and receive this > amount into your account. We are ready to share this > money with you on the basis of participation. We > also > have plans to invest part of this money in any > viable > business in your country under your care,as we are > nearing our retirement age. > > In any case, I received a reference of > you/organization from the Nigeria Chambers of > Commerce > and Industry �Foreign Trade Division� as a reputable > organ that can assist us on this transaction. Please > if you accept my proposal do not hesitate to send me > a > fax on 234 1 759 0379 or send me an e-mail on: > aloyede(a)yahoo.com , so that I can provide you with > the basic procedures for the release of the fund. > > It does not matter whether you or your company does > contract project of the nature described here, the > assumption is that you won a major contract and > subcontracted it to another company, more often than > not, big trading companies or individuals of > unrelated > field win major contracts here in Nigeria and > subcontracts same to more specialized firms for > execution. > > BENEFIT: For providing the account where we shall > remit this money, you will be entitled to 25% of the > entire funds, 70% will be for me and my > partners,while > 5% has been set aside to cover any expenses that may > be incurred by both parties during this transaction, > both local and international. > > Please I enjoin you to handle this transaction with > utmost degree of maturity and confidentiality > because > I am still in active government service with the > �NIGERIAN NATIONAL PETROLEUM CORPORATION�. If I > receive your response on time, this whole > transaction > could be accomplished within the shortest possible > time based on your interest and determination,since > the money is already in transit. > > Please, try to call me up to confirm the receipt of > your fax or e-mail.The lines may be busy,but keep > trying till you get through. > > Yours faithfully, > > MR. FIDELIS ALOYE (MNIM). > > > > > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! Messenger http://phonecard.yahoo.com/

1 0

Increase business with wealthy Russian clients
by MOSCOW WORKSHOPS 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

MOSCOW INTERNATIONAL WINTER WORKSHOP 06 September 2001 The Russian travel market continues to expand with many destinations posting increases of more than 15% this summer. The Russian Travel market is a lucrative market and the Travel Companies are looking for new offers for their clients. Doing business with Russia is often perceived of being difficult and complicated but this is not true. The Russian Travel companies are better organised, payments are always made on time and the clients enjoy spending and are generous to staff. The Moscow International Winter Workshop will take place in Moscow on September 6th and is the best opportunity to meet with the Russian Travel Trade as they prepare their winter programs. Strategically planned 6 weeks prior to the winter exhibition participation at the Workshop will ensure that your offers are included in the Russian travel companies winter programs. Winter Sun. 40% of all Vacations booked are during the winter season. Wealthy Russian clients are looking for exotic destinations, warmth, attractions and activities. Business Travel. Russian business people are prolific travellers. 64% of the Russian companies travel on business up to 10 times a year and 29% take between 10 and 50 trips a year! Meetings & Incentives. 28% of Russian companies organised Incentive Tours and more than a quarter organise International Meetings & Incentives. More than half book these travel arrangements through Travel Agents. Skiing. Russians are keen skiers and are always looking for special accommodation and new ski destinations. Summer 2002. Many Russian companies are starting to plan their next summer programs much earlier than in the past. Contact with Travel Companies in September will ensure your position for next summer. The Moscow international Workshop on September 6th, is THE event to make contact with the Russian Travel Trade. Please contact us for more details. MOSCOW INTERNATIONAL WINTER WORKSHOP www.MoscowWorkshop.com We do apologise if we have contacted you in error. Please use the delete link if you wish to be removed from this list. Please delete.

1 0

NYT: Organized Crime Case Raises Privacy Issues
by An Metet 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

By JOHN SCHWARTZ icodemo S. Scarfo Jr. might seem an unlikely champion of civil liberties in the high-tech age. Mr. Scarfo, the son of the jailed mob boss "Little Nicky" Scarfo, has been awaiting trial on charges of running gambling and loan sharking operations for the Gambino crime family. But like so many businessmen today, Mr. Scarfo kept his data on his personal computer; and like many other businessmen, he encrypted the sensitive stuff to protect it from prying eyes. Today, a federal judge in Newark will hear defense motions to throw out evidence gathered by a controversial new law enforcement technology: a system that recorded every keystroke typed on Mr. Scarfo's computer, including the password that investigators used to unscramble Mr. Scarfo's files. That wrinkle in the case makes the United States v. Scarfo the latest battleground in a growing struggle to determine the proper balance between the government's ability to conduct surveillance and a citizen's right to privacy. "It raises a whole issue of invasive law enforcement technology that really hasn't been considered by the courts yet," said David L. Sobel, who has followed the case closely as the general counsel for the Electronic Privacy Information Center in Washington. The Scarfo case comes at a time of rising concern about the government's power to snoop. In other cases, the Federal Bureau of Investigation's use of an Internet wiretap system initially known as Carnivore ignited opposition from privacy advocates and a number of Republican lawmakers, who said the technology sampled the communications of many customers of an Internet provider, not just the suspects. Similarly, public uproar accompanied the announcement that Tampa had installed surveillance cameras with facial recognition technology to spot criminal suspects in the city's Ybor entertainment district. The courts are paying attention. The Supreme Court, in a case known as Kyllo v. the United States, which was decided in June, restricted the ability of police to use thermal imaging cameras to look inside houses without a search warrant. In the majority opinion, Justice Antonin Scalia wrote that the court was confronting a fundamental question about the Fourth Amendment: "what limits there are upon this power of technology to shrink the realm of guaranteed privacy." When the police raided Mr. Scarfo's business, Merchant Services of Essex County in Belleville, N.J., in January 1999, they found a computer and copied the contents of its hard drive. But investigators could not read one file on the machine, because it had been encrypted using a common program, PGP, which stands for Pretty Good Privacy. Encryption has become an essential part of doing business on the Internet for companies and consumers alike. And the rising use of encryption technology has long been a concern of the F.B.I., which has said the technology could be devastating to criminal investigations. The Scarfo case shows one way the F.B.I. has tried to address the problem. Agents went back into Mr. Scarfo's business under court order and surreptitiously installed what court papers identify only as a "key logger system" on the target PC. The F.B.I. would not say whether the system was a hardware device or purely software, or give any details about how it worked, except to say that it recorded every keystroke entered into the machine. Agents returned to Mr. Scarfo's business over the following months to retrieve data recorded by the system. Ultimately, the logger captured a password, nds09813-050. Mr. Scarfo had apparently changed his password, however, because it did not decrypt the original file. But investigators found new versions of the file on floppy disks in Mr. Scarfo's home, and the password worked to unscramble the file, which prosecutors say contained accounts of gambling and loan activities. (The annual interest rate on the loans, as calculated by the F.B.I., was 152 percent.) In briefs presented to Judge Nicholas H. Politan of United States District Court, who will preside over today's hearing, Mr. Scarfo and his lawyers assert that any evidence collected with the help of the keyboard logger should be thrown out because the technology was not used in ways that passed Constitutional muster. They say that because the keyboard logger collected everything Mr. Scarfo typed, the court order permitting its use violated longstanding constitutional rules that search warrants and evidence collection should be as narrow as possible. They also assert that the technology is like a wiretap, and that therefore the relatively difficult process of obtaining an electronic communications wiretap order, known in law enforcement as a "Title III" order, should have been followed, instead of the more basic search warrant procedure. Mr. Scarfo's lawyers have demanded full technical details of the key logger system. The assistant United States attorney on the case, Ronald D. Wigler, said in his court response to Mr. Scarfo that the technology was used in full compliance with the law. In the brief, he refused to discuss technical details of the "sensitive law enforcement technique," saying that to do so would tip the hand of law enforcement in future cases. Mr. Wigler also said that the system did not record any e-mail communications and so the requirements for a wiretap warrant did not apply: "Letters do not become `electronic communications' subject to Title III merely because they happen to have been typed on a computer." All lawyers involved with the case are under court order not to speak about the case. Mr. Sobel said the use of keyboard loggers was a new area of surveillance that posed a threat to personal privacy. "If what this case means is we are about to see an explosion in the number of surreptitious police entries," he said, "that's a troubling development." Mr. Sobel, who has advised Mr. Scarfo's lawyers in the case and has followed it closely, said, "It's a very serious precedent." As people's computers become their mailboxes, home shopping malls, entertainment centers and more, he said, technologies like the key logger system give law enforcement "a secret means of monitoring all of that activity." Mark Rasch, an expert in government surveillance, said he was concerned about the use of the key logger before its constitutional implications have been thoroughly considered by policy makers. "What I want to know is the extent to which government believes it is entitled to invade privacy within the bounds of the law," said Mr. Rasch, a vice president of Predictive Systems (news/quote), a network consulting firm. He is also a former Justice Department lawyer who has consulted with a civil liberties group following the case. Philip R. Zimmermann, the creator of the program used by Mr. Scarfo and millions of other people worldwide, said, "I knew PGP would be used by criminals; I felt bad about that." He also said, however, that "the good uses to which PGP is put are so compelling that we have to factor that into the whole equation." He recalled inventing the program 10 years ago with goals like promoting privacy and protecting political dissidents around the world. But most powerful technologies, like automobiles, "have mixed effects on society," he said. "The fact that criminals use cars doesn't mean that the rest of us shouldn't have cars." Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company

1 0

How would this work? Would it work at all? [jsimmons@transvirtual.com: [OT] DMCA loop hole]
by Gabriel Rocha 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

How plausible would this idea be? --gabe -- "It's not brave, if you're not scared." [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type message/rfc822]

1 0

RE: NRA Prints HALF Of The Story (Barniskis)?
by Neal J. Lang 01 Aug '01

01 Aug '01

Hi, Jonathan, It takes a "big man" to see and then admit to his mistakes. Now, if I only can get some of my other friends to see the light. Thanks, Neal -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Wienke [SMTP:JonathanW@gbgcorp.com] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 5:19 PM To: Director(a)KeepAndBearArms.com; air.man(a)att.net; brian(a)citizensofamerica.org; cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net; George(a)Orwellian.Org; freematt(a)coil.com; dial911book(a)yahoo.com; lrrankin(a)silcom.com; Peter Mancus (E-mail); Merrill Gibson (E-mail); 'Neal Lang'; David Codrea (E-mail) Subject: RE: NRA Prints HALF Of The Story (Barniskis)? << File: ATT00000.html >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The American Rifleman article with the complete text of the John Ashcroft letter re the second amendment is in the August 2001 issue on pages 62 and 63, not the July issue. My apologies for the mix-up. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> iQA/AwUBO2cgtRj6oMyeDxZoEQLiTwCeNiFXMzVKO5N9h9eZwwk+UEivIRwAoP7g AM5g1whjNGCmXdwpVe5iMGK8 =H+CZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

RE: Mr. Wienke, help me out on this -- Re: FW: General Ashcroft m ake his move
by air.man＠att.net 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

Oops. Forgot to cc this: How long do you think NRA management's "Winning" Team could continue suckering gun rights supporters into sending them $200 MILLION a year if they came out and frontally assaulted the right to keep and bear arms, rather than gradually undermining it while appearing to fight the good fight? I wish you were right. I wish it was just incompetence. Russ Howard www.keepandbeararms.com/howard > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I don't have the magazine in front of me, but if you'd like, I could > scan the page and send you a JPEG or something like that of it. I > don't think the NRA is as good a defender of the Second Amendment as > it could be, and ditto with John Ashcroft, but at least they aren't > trying to totally nuke our freedoms like Clinton, Janet Reno & > Handgun Control Incorporated. > > Jonathan Wienke > > - -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Stevens [mailto:dial911book@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:51 AM > To: Jonathan Wienke; freematt(a)coil.com > Cc: George(a)Orwellian.Org; cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net; > Director(a)KeepAndBearArms.com; air.man(a)att.net; > brian(a)citizensofamerica.org > Subject: Mr. Wienke, help me out on this -- Re: FW: General Ashcroft > make his move > > > - --- Jonathan Wienke <JonathanW(a)gbgcorp.com> wrote: > > > > I get the NRA's American Rifleman magazine. The July > > issue also has > > an article about Ashcroft's letter, which does not > > quote the rather > > lengthy footnote. However, it does contain a legible > > image of BOTH > > pages of the letter, including the ENTIRE text of > > the footnote. This > > is hardly the action of an organization bent on > > distorting Ashcroft's > > view on the Second Amendment. Stupid editing on the > > part of the > > America's First Freedom team, perhaps, but not an > > organization-wide > > conspiracy. > > > > Jonathan Wienke > > > > Mr. Wienke, > > I paged through the entire July 2001 issue of American > Rifleman, and maybe I'm just blind as the proverbial > bat, but I don't see the article to which you refer > that quotes the entire Ashcroft letter. On what page > is it? > > The July 2001 issue of First Freedom is the one > featuring the Ashcroft letter -- that I have received > thus far. > > On the point you raise: maybe it was merely a bad > editorial decision for the one magazine. Fine, and we > can forgive that. But, ask this question: in what > kind of workplace environment could this kind of > editing decision be made? > > Remember that more than one editor had to approve the > final copy. This is not just a typo. More than one > person had to consciously decide to omit relevant > material without telling the reader. > > I have to wonder if other sorts of "editing decisions" > that massage the facts and distort the truth are being > made ... and we readers don't know it. > > Maybe it was entirely innocent. Then NRA should > promptly apologize, correct it and publish the full > text in the following issue. Let's see if they do. > > - --Richard Stevens > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! > Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> > > iQA/AwUBO2YCRxj6oMyeDxZoEQIcBgCfd2QPu23wfwj56en49EF9Aoou6OsAoJdJ > PLKWKsFtG76jnEqK2G6sGBZA > =xyd4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

RE: Mr. Wienke, help me out on this -- Re: FW: General Ashcroft m ake his move
by air.man＠att.net 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

Oops. Forgot to cc this. How long do you think NRA management's "Winning" Team could continue suckering gun rights supporters into sending them $200 MILLION a year if they came out and frontally assaulted the right to keep and bear arms, rather than gradually undermining it while appearing to fight the good fight? I wish you were right. I wish it was just incompetence. Russ Howard www.keepandbeararms.com/howard > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I don't have the magazine in front of me, but if you'd like, I could > scan the page and send you a JPEG or something like that of it. I > don't think the NRA is as good a defender of the Second Amendment as > it could be, and ditto with John Ashcroft, but at least they aren't > trying to totally nuke our freedoms like Clinton, Janet Reno & > Handgun Control Incorporated. > > Jonathan Wienke > > - -----Original Message----- > From: Richard Stevens [mailto:dial911book@yahoo.com] > Sent: Monday, July 30, 2001 7:51 AM > To: Jonathan Wienke; freematt(a)coil.com > Cc: George(a)Orwellian.Org; cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net; > Director(a)KeepAndBearArms.com; air.man(a)att.net; > brian(a)citizensofamerica.org > Subject: Mr. Wienke, help me out on this -- Re: FW: General Ashcroft > make his move > > > - --- Jonathan Wienke <JonathanW(a)gbgcorp.com> wrote: > > > > I get the NRA's American Rifleman magazine. The July > > issue also has > > an article about Ashcroft's letter, which does not > > quote the rather > > lengthy footnote. However, it does contain a legible > > image of BOTH > > pages of the letter, including the ENTIRE text of > > the footnote. This > > is hardly the action of an organization bent on > > distorting Ashcroft's > > view on the Second Amendment. Stupid editing on the > > part of the > > America's First Freedom team, perhaps, but not an > > organization-wide > > conspiracy. > > > > Jonathan Wienke > > > > Mr. Wienke, > > I paged through the entire July 2001 issue of American > Rifleman, and maybe I'm just blind as the proverbial > bat, but I don't see the article to which you refer > that quotes the entire Ashcroft letter. On what page > is it? > > The July 2001 issue of First Freedom is the one > featuring the Ashcroft letter -- that I have received > thus far. > > On the point you raise: maybe it was merely a bad > editorial decision for the one magazine. Fine, and we > can forgive that. But, ask this question: in what > kind of workplace environment could this kind of > editing decision be made? > > Remember that more than one editor had to approve the > final copy. This is not just a typo. More than one > person had to consciously decide to omit relevant > material without telling the reader. > > I have to wonder if other sorts of "editing decisions" > that massage the facts and distort the truth are being > made ... and we readers don't know it. > > Maybe it was entirely innocent. Then NRA should > promptly apologize, correct it and publish the full > text in the following issue. Let's see if they do. > > - --Richard Stevens > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Make international calls for as low as $.04/minute with Yahoo! > Messenger > http://phonecard.yahoo.com/ > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use <http://www.pgp.com> > > iQA/AwUBO2YCRxj6oMyeDxZoEQIcBgCfd2QPu23wfwj56en49EF9Aoou6OsAoJdJ > PLKWKsFtG76jnEqK2G6sGBZA > =xyd4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

RE: NRA Prints HALF Of The Story (Barniskis)?
by air.man＠att.net 31 Jul '01

31 Jul '01

Hmm. Let me get this straight. Project Gulag is the best thing for RKBA since, what was it, I don't know, the Nazi Gun Control Act of 1938? ENFORCE ALL EXISTING GUN LAWS WITH ZERO TOLERANCE. That's the core Project Gulag mantra, and it didn't take a rocket scientist to predict that the overt enemy, HCI et al., would accept it with open arms, make it their own program, and run with it. Why do you think NRA now holds press conferences with HCI to support it? Do you really think the anti-gunners are that stupid? Sometimes the "Winning" Team adds a mumble or two about aiming Project Gulag against "criminals." Well what the hell do you think most of us already are who refuse to comply with those existing gun laws we tried to stop from being enacted in the first place? And don't tell me NRA management's "Winning" Team gives a rat's ass about putting potential felons like me and most other gun rights activists in prison. That's why their infomercial says "then he did what any decent, law- abiding citizen would do, and turned in his guns." That quote reveals the mindset of NRA's "Winning" Team management. It's a pro-police-state, authority worshipping team. If Feinstein passes a law, they expect you to obey it. And if you don't, they'll help send you up the river right along with the murderers, convenience store robbers, serial rapists, and child molesters. All you have to do is get caught ignoring an existing gun law, or a new one. I wish it was just incompetence, but it's not. And I wish I didn't know about it. Life was happier when I could believe NRA was run by more or less well- intentioned, if not totally competent people. But it isn't, and having served on the board, I bear the burden of first hand knowledge. It's not pleasant to have to tell grown men there's no gun rights tooth fairy. Too many folks are compelled by nature to believe that everything NRA does is by definition right, and if it doesn't appear to be right, than somehow it must be part of a diabolically good plan hatched by masterminds that'll work out for us in the end. I was once one of those folks, and I'm here to urge you to get over it. Do the movement a favor; cut the tribalistic worship routine and stop treating NRA like a sacred cow, immutable in nature. It's not. It's run by real people, increasingly those who are helping destroy our heritage of freedom. There's a Wizard of Oz behind the drapes, and he's not on our side. Yes, most of us need something to believe in. But the NRA is important only because of the good or harm it can do to our heritage. Loyalty to the Constitution is vastly more important than blind loyalty to the NRA. And being loyal to the rightful mission of the NRA, which I am, has long been dangerously inconsistent with blind loyalty to NRA management, especially the current "Winning" Team Junta. Russ Howard www.keepandbeararms.com/howard > From: Neal Lang <NealL(a)mwicorp.com> > Subject: RE: NRA Prints HALF Of The Story (Barniskis)? > Date sent: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 15:51:26 -0400 > > > Hi, Angel, > > > > If I get real ambitious and write the definitive expose' on why > > "Project Exile" is the best thing for the "right to keep and bear > > arms" since the discovery of smokeless powder, would you have the > > "good sense" publish same on your site? > > > > Keep the Faith, > > > > Neal > > > Sure. If you don't mind publishing your eddress so I don't have to > invest hours on end listening to people shotgun your false > assumptions, oversights and miscalcualtions. :-) > > Knock yourself out. Stick it here: > https://www.keepandbeararms.com/newsarchives/XcNPAdd.asp > > Better yet, and much preferred, be the first to challenge exact excerpts > from the Project Exile Condemnation Coalition's statement -- so you > can heal us poor, misguided fools of our afflictions: > http://www.KeepAndBearArms.com/exile2 > > Shamaya Smartaleck > > >

1 0