- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Begging for Enemies of the State
by John Young 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

WSJ had a hilarious report yesterday about the frantic search for prisoners to fill empty prison beds that have resulted from frantic construction to meet court orders and mandatory sentencing now offset by declining crime rates -- or sentencing rates -- and governments kicking prisoners out of jail to reduce costs. The competiton between government-run prisons and the commercial ops have led to fabulous lobbying and jawboning of legislators and wardens to spread the lucrative but diminishing prison-care population around, represented in the report by Mississippi's plight of having too few prisoners to fill its state pens and county jails. At one point a bill was near passage that would have paid commercial operators for empty beds, for "ghost prisoners," so they wouldn't pull out to the business (following the admirable lead of the defense and farming industries). When that term made it into the news, there was a quick veto of the bill, but still the struggle goes on to find more prisoners or bookkeeping simulations thereof. Florida leads the nation with over 80,000 empty prison beds. Pity the pressured investigators and prosecutors and spooks to fabricate more enemies of the state or AP-bookkeeping simulations thereof.

2 1

Request for SSSCA mirror help
by Declan McCullagh 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

I've put the complete SSSCA draft text in a PDF file here: http://www.well.com/~declan/sssca-draft.pdf Can I talk some folks who can spare the bandwidth into mirroring it and sending me the URL? The file's 2.5 MB, and I don't want to overload the Well's poor servers. Then I'll distribute a list of the original and the mirror sites. Please disregard this message after 3 pm ET Saturday. Thanks, Declan

1 1

Your Ad Time:12:23:52 PM
by cypherpunks＠toad.com 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

Hi, I noticed your well done ad in classifieds. As a PPL associate I'd like to introduce myself and maybe compare notes. If you'd like to do so please email me at info(a)free-law-central.com Meanwhile check out my site that I and many other associates are using to gain a large volume of names due to the SEM system and popup windows that follow the visitor as he navigates the normal PPL site. Here's some URLs to check out... Home page w/popup http://www.free-law-central.com Associate recruiting page http://www.free-law-central.com/associate_lead.htm Focus advertising page http://www.free-law-central.com/free_will.htm Our associate's support site http://www.officialinfo.net To your success J.R. Orsoni 954-566-5175 P.S. If you ever want to chat live go to: http://www.free-law-central.com/associate_talk.htm 8/9/01

1 0

Your Ad Time:11:28:11 AM
by cypherpunks＠toad.com 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

Hi, I noticed your well done ad in classifieds. As a PPL associate I'd like to introduce myself and maybe compare notes. If you'd like to do so please email me at info(a)free-law-central.com Meanwhile check out my site that I and many other associates are using to gain a large volume of names due to the SEM system and popup windows that follow the visitor as he navigates the normal PPL site. Here's some URLs to check out... Home page w/popup http://www.free-law-central.com Associate recruiting page http://www.free-law-central.com/associate_lead.htm Focus advertising page http://www.free-law-central.com/free_will.htm Our associate's support site http://www.officialinfo.net To your success J.R. Orsoni 954-566-5175 P.S. If you ever want to chat live go to: http://www.free-law-central.com/associate_talk.htm 8/9/01

1 0

LOANS WITH NO STRINGS ATTACHED
by palzone12＠postino.ch 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

1 0

[RRE]Your Face Is Not a Bar Code (fwd)
by Eugene Leitl 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

-- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204/">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBMTO : N48 10'07'' E011 33'53'' http://www.lrz.de/~ui22204 57F9CFD3: ED90 0433 EB74 E4A9 537F CFF5 86E7 629B 57F9 CFD3 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:53:48 -0700 From: Phil Agre <pagre(a)alpha.oac.ucla.edu> To: Red Rock Eater News Service <rre(a)lists.gseis.ucla.edu> Subject: [RRE]Your Face Is Not a Bar Code =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= This message was forwarded through the Red Rock Eater News Service (RRE). You are welcome to send the message along to others but please do not use the "redirect" option. For information about RRE, including instructions for (un)subscribing, see http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/people/pagre/rre.html =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Your Face Is Not a Bar Code: Arguments Against Automatic Face Recognition in Public Places Phil Agre http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/pagre/ Version of 7 September 2001. 2600 words. Copyright 2001 by Phil Agre. You are welcome to forward this article in electronic form to anyone for any noncommercial reason. Please do not post it on any Web sites; instead, link to it here: http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/people/pagre/bar-code.html Given a digital image of a person's face, face recognition software matches it against a database of other images. If any of the stored images matches closely enough, the system reports the sighting to its owner. Research on automatic face recognition has been around for decades, but accelerated in the 1990s. Now it is becoming practical, and face recognition systems are being deployed on a large scale. Some applications of automatic face recognition systems are relatively unobjectionable. Many facilities have good reasons to authenticate everyone who walks in the door, for example to regulate access to weapons, money, criminal evidence, nuclear materials, or biohazards. When a citizen has been arrested for probable cause, it is reasonable for the police to use automatic face recognition to match a mug shot of the individual against a database of mug shots of people who have been arrested previously. These uses of the technology should be publicly justified, and audits should ensure that the technology is being used only for proper purposes. Face recognition systems in public places, however, are a matter for serious concern. The issue recently came to broad public attention when it emerged that fans attending the Super Bowl had unknowingly been matched against a database of alleged criminals, and when the city of Tampa deployed a face-recognition system in the nightlife district of Ybor City. But current and proposed uses of face recognition are much more widespread, as the resources at the end of this article demonstrate in detail. The time to consider the acceptability of face recognition in public places is now, before the practice becomes entrenched and people start getting hurt. Nor is the problem limited to the scattered cases that have been reported thus far. As the underlying information and communication technologies (digital cameras, image databases, processing power, and data communications) become radically cheaper over the next two decades, face recognition will become dramatically cheaper as well, even without assuming major advances in technologies such as image processing that are specific to recognizing faces. Legal constraints on the practice in the United States are minimal. (In Europe the data protection laws will apply, providing at least some basic rights of notice and correction.) Databases of identified facial images already exist in large numbers (driver's license and employee ID records, for example), and new facial-image databases will not be hard to construct, with or without the knowledge or consent of the people whose faces are captured. (The images need to be captured under controlled conditions, but most citizens enter controlled, video-monitored spaces such as shops and offices on a regular basis.) It is nearly certain, therefore, that automatic face recognition will grow explosively and become pervasive unless action is taken now. I believe that automatic face recognition in public places, including commercial spaces such as shopping malls that are open to the public, should be outlawed. The dangers outweigh the benefits. The necessary laws will not be passed, however, without overwhelming pressure of public opinion and organizing. To that end, this article presents the arguments against automatic face recognition in public places, followed by responses to the most common arguments in favor. Arguments against automatic face recognition in public places * The potential for abuse is astronomical. Pervasive automatic face recognition could be used to track individuals wherever they go. Systems operated by different organizations could easily be networked to cooperate in tracking an individual from place to place, whether they know the person's identity or not, and they can share whatever identities they do know. This tracking information could be used for many purposes. At one end of the spectrum, the information could be leaked to criminals who want to understand a prospective victim's travel patterns. Information routinely leaks from databases of all sorts, and there is no reason to believe that tracking databases will be any different. But even more insidiously, tracking information can be used to exert social control. Individuals will be less likely to contemplate public activities that offend powerful interests if they know that their identity will be captured and relayed to anyone that wants to know. * The information from face recognition systems is easily combined with information from other technologies. Industry often refers to face recognition as "facial recognition" because they regard faces as one modality of identification among many. Among the many "biometric" identification technologies, face recognition requires the least cooperation from the individual. Automatic fingerprint reading, by contrast, requires an individual to press a finger against a machine. (It will eventually be possible to identify people by the DNA-bearing cells that they leave behind, but that technology is a long way from becoming ubiquitous.) Organizations that have good reasons to identify individuals should employ whatever technology has the least inherent potential for abuse, yet very few identification technologies have more potential for abuse than face recognition. Information from face recognition systems is also easily combined with so-called location technologies such as E-911 location tracking in cell phones, thus further adding to the danger of abuse. * The technology is hardly foolproof. Among the potential downsides are false positives, for example that so-and-so was "seen" on a street frequented by drug dealers. Such a report will create "facts" that the individual must explain away. Yet the conditions for image capture and recognition in most public places are far from ideal. Shadows, occlusions, reflections, and multiple uncontrolled light sources all increase the risk of false positives. As the database of facial images grows bigger, the chances of a false match to one of those images grows proportionally larger. * Many social institutions depend on the difficulty of putting names to faces without human intervention. If people could be identified just from looking in a shop window or eating in a restaurant, it would be a tremendous change in our society's conception of the human person. People would find strangers addressing them by name. Prospective customers walking into a shop could find that their credit reports and other relevant information had already been pulled up and displayed for the sales staff before they even inquire about the goods. Even aside from the privacy invasion that this represents, premature disclosure of this sort of information could affect the customer's bargaining position. * The public is poorly informed about the capabilities of the cameras that are already ubiquitous in many countries. They usually do not realize, for example, what can be done with the infrared component of the captured images. Even the phrase "face recognition" does not convey how easily the system can extract facial expressions. It is not just "identity" that can be captured, then, but data that reaches into the person's psyche. Even if the public is adequately informed about the capabilities of this year's cameras, software and data sharing can be improved almost invisibly next year. * It is very hard to provide effective notice of the presence and capabilities of cameras in most public places, much less obtain meaningful consent. Travel through many public places, for example government offices and centralized transportation facilities, is hardly a matter of choice for any individual wishing to live in the modern world. Even in the private sector, many retail industries (groceries, for example) are highly concentrated, so that consumers have little choice but to submit to the dominant company's surveillance practices. * If face recognition technologies are pioneered in countries where civil liberties are relatively strong, it becomes more likely that they will also be deployed in countries where civil liberties hardly exist. In twenty years, at current rates of progress, it will be feasible for the Chinese government to use face recognition to track the public movements of everyone in the country. Responses to arguments in favor of automatic face recognition in public places * "All of the people in our database are wanted criminals. We don't store any of the images that our cameras capture, except when they match an image in the database. So the only people who have any cause for complaint are criminals." The problems with this argument are numerous: (1) We have to trust your word that the only people whose images are stored in the database are wanted criminals, and we have to trust your word that you throw away all of the images that fail to match the database. (2) You don't really know yourself whether all of the people in the database are criminals. Quality control on those databases is far from perfect, as the database of "felons" that was used to purge some Florida counties' electoral rolls in 2000 demonstrated. (3) Even if the only people in the database today are criminals, the forces pushing us down a slippery slope of every-expanding databases are nearly overwhelming. Once the system is established and working, why not add people with criminal records who have served their time? Then we could add alleged troublemakers who have been ejected from businesses in the past but have never been convicted of crimes, people who have been convicted of minor offenses such as shoplifting, people with court orders to stay away from certain places, missing persons, children whose parents are worried about them, elders whose children are worried about them, employees of the business where the system is operating, and other individuals who have signed contracts agreeing to be tracked. And once those people are added, it is then a short step to add many other categories of people as well. * "Public is public. If someone happens to notice you walking in the park, you have no grounds for complaint if they decide to tell someone else where you were. That's all we're doing. You don't have any reasonable expectation of privacy in a public place, and I have a free-speech right to communicate factual information about where you were." A human being who spots me in the park has the accountability that someone can spot them as well. Cameras are much more anonymous and easy to hide. More important is the question of scale. Most people understand the moral difference between a single chance observation in a park and an investigator who follows you everywhere you go. The information collected in the second case is obviously more dangerous. What is more, custom and law have always recognized many kinds of privacy in public. For example, the press cannot publish pictures of most people in personally sensitive situations that have no legitimate news value. It is considered impolite to listen in on conversations in public. Pervasive face recognition clearly lies at the morally most problematic end of this spectrum. The chance of being spotted is different from the certainty of being tracked. The phrase "reasonable expectation of privacy" comes from a US Supreme Court decision. The phrase has been widely criticized as useless, since reason that reasonable expectations of privacy in a situation can disappear as soon as someone starts routinely invading privacy in that situation. The problem is an often-exploited ambiguity in the word "expectation", which can mean either a prediction (with no logical implication that the world morally *ought* to hold conform to it) or a norm (with no logical implication that the world actually *will* conform to it). In arguing in favor of a ban on automatic face recognition in public places, one is not arguing for a blanket "right of privacy in public", which would be unreasonable and impractical. Rather, one is arguing for a right against technologically mediated privacy invasions of certain types. Technological mediation is key because of its continuous operation, standardized results, lack of other legitimate purposes, and rapidly dropping costs. The argument about free speech rights is spurious because the proposed ban is not on the transfer of information, but on the creation of certain kinds of electronic records. You still have the right to communicate the same information if you acquire it in other ways. * "Automatic face recognition stops crime. Police say they want it. And if it prevents one child from being killed then I support it." A free society is a society in which there are limits on what the police can do. If we want to remain a free society then we need to make a decision. Once a new surveillance technology is installed, it is nearly impossible to stop the slippery slope toward ever broader law enforcement use of it. The case of automatic toll collection makes this clear. Absent clear legal protections, then, we should assume from the beginning that any technology that captures personal information will be used for law enforcement purposes, and not only in cases where lives are immediately at stake. The potential for abuse should then be figured into our decision about whether the technology should be deployed at all. That said, it is hardly proven that face recognition stops crime, when face recognition is being added to a world that already contains many other crime-fighting technologies. The range of crime detection technologies available to the police has grown immensely in recent years, and even if one encountered a case where a crime was solved using a given technology it by no means follows that the crime would not have been solved equally well using some other technology. * "Privacy prevents the marketplace from functioning efficiently. When a company knows more about you, it can tailor its offerings more specifically to your needs. Of course if you ask people whether scary face recognition systems should be banned then they'll say yes. But you're asking the wrong question. The right question is whether people are willing to give up information in exchange for something of value, and most people are." This is a non sequitur. Few proposals for privacy protection prevent people from voluntarily handing information about themselves to companies with which they wish to do business. The problem arises when information is transferred without the individual's knowledge, and in ways that might well cause upset or harm if they became known. What distinguishes automatic face recognition from many other equally good identification technologies is that it can be used without the individual's permission (and therefore without the individual having agreed to any exchange). That is why it should be banned. * "A preoccupation with privacy is corrosive. Democracy requires people to have public personae, and excessive secrecy is unhealthy." Privacy does not equal secrecy. Privacy means that an individual has reasonable control over what information is made public, and what is not. Any decent social order requires that individuals be entrusted with this judgement. Even if particular individuals choose to become secretive in a pathological way, forcing them to change will not help the situation and is intrinsincally wrong anyway. As to the value of public personae, we should encourage the development of technologies that give people the option to appear publicly where and how they want. * "What do you have to hide?" This line is used against nearly every attempt to protect personal privacy, and the response in each case is the same. People have lots of valid reasons, personal safety for example, to prevent particular others from knowing particular information about them. Democracy only works if groups can organize and develop their political strategies in seclusion from the government, and from any established interests they might be opposing. This includes, for example, the identities of people who might travel through public places to gather for a private political meeting. In its normal use, the question "What do you have to hide?" stigmatizes all personal autonomy as anti-social. As such it is an authoritarian demand, and has no place in a free society. For more responses to bad arguments against privacy, see: http://dlis.gseis.ucla.edu/people/pagre/arguments.html News articles with background on face recognition. Facial-Recognition System Gets Millions in Federal Funds http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/svfront/016044.htm Facial ID Systems Raising Concerns About Privacy http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A12629-2001Jul31.html Facial-Recognition Tech Has People Pegged http://www.cnn.com/2001/TECH/ptech/07/17/face.time.idg/ Face Scanners Turn Lens on Selves http://wired.com/news/privacy/0,1848,45687,00.html Face-Recognition Systems Offer New Tools, but Mixed Results http://www.biometricgroup.com/a_press/NYTimes_May_2001.htm How Facial Recognition Software Finds Faces http://abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/CuttingEdge/cuttingedge010706.html Law Enforcement Agencies Working on 3D Face Recognition Technology http://asia.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9909/24/3d.face.recognition.idg/ Face-Recognition Technology Raises Fears of Big Brother http://www.deseretnews.com/dn/view/0%2C1249%2C150015975%2C00.html Seeking Clues to Recognition ... in Your Face http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/news/health-science/html98/face_20000111.h… Smile, You're On Scan Camera http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,42317,00.html Other sites with background information on face recognition technology and its potential for privacy invasion. Electronic Privacy Information Center Face Recognition Page http://www.epic.org/privacy/facerecognition/ Coalition Declares December 24, 2001 to Be "World Subjectrights Day" http://wearcam.org/wsd.htm Facial Recognition Vendor Test 2000 http://www.dodcounterdrug.com/facialrecognition/DLs/FRVT_2000.pdf http://www.dodcounterdrug.com/facialrecognition/FRVT2000/frvt2000.htm Selected Facial Scan Projects http://www.facial-scan.com/selected_facial_scan_projects1.htm US government site for biometric technology (including face recognition) http://www.biometrics.org/ Facing the Truth: A New Tool to Analyze Our Expressions http://www.hhmi.org/bulletin/may2001/faces/ Biometrics: Face Recognition Technology http://www.sans.org/infosecFAQ/authentic/face_rec.htm Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition, Washington, 20-21 May 2002 http://degas.umiacs.umd.edu/pirl/fg2002/ the two dominant face recognition companies http://www.visionics.com/faceit/ http://www.viisage.com/ other companies http://www.visionspheretech.com/menu.htm http://www.symtrontech.com/ http://www.cognitec-ag.de/ http://www.c-vis.com/htdocs/english/facesnap/ http://www.neurodynamics.com/ http://www.imagistechnologies.com/ http://www.spiritcorp.com/face_rec.html http://www.bio4.co.uk/ http://www.bioid.com/ http://www.miros.com/solutions/face.htm http://www.keyware.com/ http://www.bionetrix.com/ Web pages about technical research projects on face recognition. directory of face recognition research http://www.cs.rug.nl/~peterkr/FACE/face.html Face Recognition and Detection http://home.t-online.de/home/Robert.Frischholz/face.htm DoD Counterdrug Program Face Recognition Technology Program http://www.dodcounterdrug.com/facialrecognition/Feret/feret.htm http://www.itl.nist.gov/iad/humanid/feret/feret_master.html Wearable Face Recognition and Detection http://www.gvu.gatech.edu/ccg/projects/face/ Identification of Faces From Video http://staff.psy.gla.ac.uk/~mike/videoproj.html Evaluation of Face Recognition Algorithms http://www.cs.colostate.edu/evalfacerec/ slides from an MIT course on human and artificial face recognition http://web.mit.edu/9.670/www/ Gesture Recognition Home Page (related technology) http://www.cybernet.com/~ccohen/ Articles about face-recognition controversies in various places, roughly in reverse chronological order. Borders stores first Borders says it "suspended any plans to implement" face recognition ... http://www.computerworld.com/storyba/0,4125,NAV47_STO63359,00.html ... then it denies that it ever had any such intention http://www.politechbot.com/p-02447.html Borders is planning to use face recognition to identify shop-lifters http://www.sundayherald.com/18007/ casinos Smart Cameras at Casinos Spark a Debate on Privacy http://www.uniontrib.com/news/metro/20010717-9999_1n17cameras.html Privacy Commissioner Reassures Public That Casinos Are Not Scanning All Patrons http://www.ipc.on.ca/english/whatsnew/newsrel/casino01.htm OPP uses secret cameras in casinos ("police are secretly scanning the faces of customers at all Ontario casinos") http://www.efc.ca/pages/media/2001/2001-01-16-a-torontostar.html Global Cash Access Signs New Contracts With 20 Gaming Properties (face-recognizing ATM machines in casinos) http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/010823/232101_3.html Smile! You're on Casino Camera http://wbbm.cbsnow.com/now/story/0,1597,274604-240,00.shtml Virginia Beach, Virginia Technology Helps Authorities Keep a Constant Eye on Public http://www.pilotonline.com/news/nw0827cam.html Beach May Scan Oceanfront Faces http://www.pilotonline.com/news/nw0706fac.html Huntington Beach, California Imagis and ORION Chosen to Install Biometrics by Huntington Beach Police http://cipherwar.com/news/01/imagis_big_brother.htm Jacksonville, Florida Police Snooper Camera Fight Still Alive http://www.jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/083101/met_7161286.html Florida City Moves to Ban Face-Recognition System http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/fcw2.htm Pinellas County, Florida Face Recognition System Will Be Used by Florida Sheriff's Office http://www.friendsofliberty.com/files/2001/07/27/02.htm Britain Think Tank Urges Face-Scanning of the Masses http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/20966.html face recognition technology in the UK http://www.urban75.com/Action/cctv.html http://www.sourceuk.net/articles/a00624.html Newham Council Launches "Face Recognition" in the UK http://www.newham.gov.uk/press/julythrunov98/facereg.html Joyrider, 14, Is First Tagging Guinea Pig http://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/0,,2-2001242628,00.html Colorado Colorado Governor Doesn't Want Face Recognition Technology Abused http://www.thedenverchannel.com/den/entertainment/stories/technology-879856… Colorado Won't Use Facial Recognition Technology on Licenses http://www.thedenverchannel.com/den/entertainment/stories/technology-869550… Colorado To Use Face Recognition Photos To Stop ID Theft http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/167655.html Colorado to "Map" Faces of Drivers http://www.denverpost.com/Stories/0,1002,11%257E57823,00.html Minnesota Minnesota Adopts Visionics' FaceIt for Integrated Mug Shot Database System http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/010814/142123.html Super Bowl Face Scans Match Few Suspects http://www.sptimes.com/News/021601/TampaBay/Face_scans_match_few_.shtml ACLU Protests High-Tech Super Bowl Surveillance http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/2001-02-02-super-bowl-surveillance.… Super Bowl Surveillance: Facing Up to Biometrics http://www.rand.org/publications/IP/IP209/IP209.pdf Feds Use Biometrics Against Super Bowl Fans http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/6/16561.html Cameras Scanned Fans for Criminals http://www.sptimes.com/News/013101/TampaBay/Cameras_scanned_fans_.shtml Tampa, Florida Facial Frisking in Tampa http://www.privacyfoundation.org/commentary/tipsheet.asp?id=46&action=0 complete directory of Tampa news articles through early August from the ACLU http://www.gate.net/~rwms/aclutampacam.html "Big Brother" Cameras on Watch for Criminals http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/2001-08-02-big-brother-cameras.htm "They made me feel like a criminal" http://www.sptimes.com/News/080801/TampaBay/_They_made_me_feel_li.shtml Tampa Face-Recognition Vote Rattles Privacy Group http://www.newsbytes.com/news/01/168677.html Civil Rights or Just Sour Grapes? http://www.sptimes.com/News/080301/TampaBay/Civil_rights_or_just_.shtml Tampa City Council meeting which voted to keep the face recognition cameras http://www.ci.tampa.fl.us/appl_Cable_Communications_closed_captioning/frmAg… Click. BEEP! Face Captured http://www.sptimes.com/News/071901/Floridian/Click_BEEP_Face_captu.shtml Tampa Gets Ready For Its Closeup http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,167846,00.html Masked Protesters Fight Face Scans http://www.sptimes.com/News/071501/TampaBay/Masked_protesters_fig.shtml Tampa Puts Face-Recognition System on Public Street http://www.usatoday.com/life/cyber/tech/2001-07-13-tampa-surveillance.htm Congressional Leader Calls for Action on Ybor City Surveillance (Ybor City is a busy nightlife neighborhood of Tampa) http://www.wtsp.com/news/2001_07/12_ybor_cameras.htm ACLU Probes Police Use of Facial-Recognition Cameras in Florida City http://www.aclu.org/news/2001/n070601a.html http://freedom.house.gov/library/technology/aclu.asp Tampa Scans the Faces in Its Crowds for Criminals http://www.nytimes.com/2001/07/04/technology/04VIDE.html public radio report about the controversy http://www.npr.org/ramfiles/atc/20010702.atc.14.rmm Ybor Police Cameras Go Spy-Tech http://www.sptimes.com/News/063001/TampaBay/Ybor_police_cameras_g.shtml end

1 0

Базы данных предприятий для контактов по электронной почте
by MailBase 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

Здравствуйте! В этом письме: - базы данных предприятий для контактов по электронной почте; - программа для автоматической рассылки электронной почты; - базы данных крупнейших предприятий. Когда необходимо быстро и с минимальными затратами сообщить определенной целевой группе предприятий какую-либо информацию, нет ничего лучше, чем сделать это по электронной почте. Наши базы данных для контактов по электронной почте предназначены специально для этих целей. Многие отрицательно относятся к массовым электронным рассылки, печально известным как spam. Однако мы считаем, нет ничего плохого в том, что фирма, выбрав из базы ограниченный круг предприятий (и только предприятий, а не частных лиц!) лишь определенного рода деятельности, рассылает по ним соответствующее предложение небольшого объема, которое действительно реально может их заинтересовать. Такие рассылки можно использовать не только для рекламных целей. Например, вам нужно узнать стоимость определенного товара, производимого или продаваемого определенной группой организаций. Обзвонить 500, а то и 1000 фирм - занятие, требующее значительного времени. А если сделать рассылку с соответствующим запросом по данной группе организаций, можно быстро получить полную информацию по интересующему вопросу. Предлагаем Вам два комплекта для контактов по электронной почте: Комплект "Организации Москвы" - 38000 предприятий (все с электронными адресами); Комплект "Организации СНГ" - 30000 предприятий (все с электронными адресами) Каждый комплект включает в себя: - соответствующую базу данных для контактов по электронной почте; - программу GroupMail для автоматической рассылки электронной почты. База данных "38000 организаций Москвы". Кроме электронного адреса (e-mail имеется у каждой организации) по каждой компании представлены: - название, - род деятельности, - телефоны, - факс, - почтовый адрес, - адрес сайта. База оформлена в виде стандартной таблицы Excel, что позволяет работать с нею пользователю с любым уровнем знания компьютера, и дает возможность сортировки строк по любому из параметров, например, по роду деятельности. В базу вошли все компании, которые сами публикуют свой e-mail в различных бизнес-справочниках по Москве. Возвратов с несуществующих адресов при рассылках: 15%. Обновление базы происходит каждый квартал. База с программой предоставляется на компакт-диске или высылается электронной почтой. СТОИМОСТЬ данной базы в комплекте с программой GroupMail (см. ниже) - $300. Стоимость обновления $60. Форма оплаты любая. Заказы и вопросы направляйте на адрес mailbase(a)post.com. База данных "30000 предприятий СНГ". Кроме электронного адреса (e-mail имеется у каждой организации) по каждой компании представлены: - название, - форма собственности, - телефоны, - факс, - почтовый адрес, - адрес сайта, - Ф.И.О. и должность руководителя (!), - численность штата, - список производимых товаров и услуг. База оформлена в виде стандартной таблицы Excel, что позволяет работать с нею пользователю с любым уровнем знания компьютера. Возвратов с несуществующих адресов при рассылках: 20%. Обновление базы происходит каждый квартал. База с программой предоставляется на компакт-диске или высылается электронной почтой. СТОИМОСТЬ данной базы в комплекте с программой GroupMail (см. ниже) - $200. Стоимость обновления $40. Форма оплаты любая. Заказы и вопросы направляйте на адрес mailbase(a)post.com. Программа "Group Mail" предназначена для осуществления электронных рассылок. Во время рассылки "Group Mail" генерирует и отсылает письма для каждого получателя в отдельности. При этом в текстах (как в теме, так и в теле письма) может использоваться подстановка информации из различных ячеек базы, соответствующих конкретному адресу. Это позволяет обращаться к каждому получателю по имени в рассылках по базе Ваших клиентов или партнеров, а также любым другим образом персонифицировать Вашу рассылку. Например, тема письма может быть такой: "Предложение для компании (название_компании)". "Group Mail" имеет широкие возможности по ведению баз данных. Вы можете импортировать в программу свои базы. Их может быть неограниченное количество. Базы можно создавать, дополнять, редактировать. Письма в рассылках могут составляться как в формате txt, так и html. Реализована возможность прикрепления файлов любого формата. Group Mail работает без участия какой-либо другой почтовой программы. Программа "Group Mail" бесплатно прилагается к каждой из вышеописанных баз данных. Но ее можно приобрести и отдельно для рассылки по своим базам. В этом случае стоимость ее предоставления $25. Форма оплаты любая. Программа предоставляется на компакт-диске или высылается электронной почтой. Заказы и вопросы направляйте на адрес mailbase(a)post.com. Внимание! При одновременном приобретении обеих баз данных предоставляется скидка: $100! Выполняем электронные рассылки по Вашему заказу. Заказы и вопросы направляйте на адрес mailbase(a)post.com. Имеются также маркетинговые базы данных КРУПНЕЙШИХ ПРЕДПРИЯТИЙ: "Предприятия Москвы/России/СНГ с численностью штата более 50/500/1000 человек". Стоимости этх баз данных от $100 до $300. Форма оплаты любая. Базы предоставляется на компакт диске или высылается электронной почтой. Заказы и вопросы направляйте на адрес mailbase(a)post.com. Базы региональных промышленных предприятий. mailbase(a)post.com. Компания MailBase, E-mail: mailbase(a)post.com

1 0

Fwd: Your Marketing Request
by unknown＠example.com 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

Below is the result of your feedback form. It was submitted by () on Friday, September 7, 2001 at 23:20:15 --------------------------------------------------------------------------- message: Fwd: [From Tim Jameston] ATTENTION: ANY SERIOUS NETWORK MARKETER TAKE A LOOK AT THE FOLLOWING OPPORTUNITIES I CAME ACROSS!! IF YOU PLUG INTO THEIR PROVEN SYSTEM, THEY GUARANTEE YOU SUCCESS, AND PROVIDE YOU WITH FREE LEADS TO BUILD YOUR GROUP!! http://www.geocities.com/newwealthsolutions2002 Please Email Us Directly At wealthtopic999(a)yahoo.com If You Experience Any Problems With The Site As It Is Very Popular And Sometimes Very Busy. **YOU MUST INCLUDE YOUR NAME AND PHONE NUMBER TO RECEIVE A RESPONSE** ALSO - If You Are An Aol Member, You Can View The Site ButMust Email Us Directly As We Are Not Able To Receive Your Requests Through The Site. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

For TOP Manager
by nmh＠mart.ru 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

KOI...................... KOI......................... KOI îÁ ÓÔÏÌ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÀ - ÌÉÞÎÏ É ÓÒÏÞÎÏ! îÁÓÔÁÌÏ ×ÒÅÍÑ ÐÏÄ×ÅÓÔÉ ÉÔÏÇ ÒÅÚÕÌØÔÁÔÏ× É ÚÁÐÌÁÎÉÒÏ×ÁÔØ ÂÕÄÕÝÅÅ ÐÅÒÅÄ ÎÁÞÁÌÏÍ ÄÅÌÏ×ÏÊ ÁËÔÉ×ÎÏÓÔÉ!!! ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒ "ðòïòù÷ ÷ õðòá÷ìåîéé" - ×ÏÔ, ÞÔÏ ÐÏÍÏÖÅÔ... óÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÐÒÅÄÎÁÚÎÁÞÅÎ ÄÌÑ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÅÊ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÊ. ïÎ ÄÁÅÔ ÚÎÁÎÉÑ É ÍÅÔÏÄÉËÉ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÐÌÁÎÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÑ É ×ÎÅÄÒÅÎÉÑ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÊ, ËÁË É ÞÔÏ ÎÕÖÎÏ ÍÅÎÑÔØ × ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ ÄÌÑ ÕÓÐÅÛÎÏÇÏ ÒÁÚ×ÉÔÉÑ. óÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÂÕÄÅÔ ÉÎÔÅÒÅÓÅÎ × ÐÅÒ×ÕÀ ÏÞÅÒÅÄØ ÔÅÍ, ËÔÏ ÐÏÓÔÏÑÎÎÏ ÚÁÄÁÅÔ ÓÅÂÅ ×ÏÐÒÏÓÙ: - ËÁË ÄÁÌØÛÅ ÒÁÚ×É×ÁÔØÓÑ? - ëÁË ÖÉÔØ ÓÅÊÞÁÓ, ÐÒÉ ÔÁËÏÍ ÈÁÏÓÅ × ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÉ É ÔÁËÏÊ ÔÅËÕÞËÅ × ÄÅÌÁÈ? - ÞÔÏ ÍÏÖÎÏ ÉÚÍÅÎÉÔØ × ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ ÄÌÑ ÕÌÕÞÛÅÎÉÑ ÓÉÔÕÁÃÉÉ? ðÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÁ ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÁ ÒÁÚÒÁÂÏÔÁÎÁ ÎÁ ÏÓÎÏ×Å ÏÐÙÔÁ ÒÅÆÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÑ òÏÓÓÉÊÓËÉÈ ÐÒÅÄÐÒÉÑÔÉÊ É ×ÅÄÅÔ Å£ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÎÔ ÐÏ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÏÎÎÏÍÕ ÒÁÚ×ÉÔÉÀ, Á×ÔÏÒ ÍÎÏÇÉÈ ÓÔÁÔÅÊ × ÏÂÌÁÓÔÉ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ, ÐÒÅÐÏÄÁ×ÁÔÅÌØ ËÕÒÓÁ "óÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÉÊ ÍÅÎÅÄÖÍÅÎÔ" ÄÌÑ M.B.A × "íéòâéó" ÞÅÌÏ×ÅË Ó 5 ÌÅÔÎÉÍ ÏÐÙÔÏÍ ÒÁÂÏÔÙ ÎÁ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÑÝÉÈ ÄÏÌÖÎÏÓÔÑÈ!!! óÅÍÉÎÁÒ ÐÒÏÊÄÅÔ 13 É 14 ÓÅÎÔÑÂÒÑ × íÏÓË×Å, × éÎÓÔÉÔÕÔÅ ïÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÏÎÎÏÇÏ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÑ. óÏÄÅÒÖÁÎÉÅ ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÁ: · ëÔÏ ÔÁËÏÊ ÐÒÅÄÐÒÉÎÉÍÁÔÅÌØ É ËÔÏ ÔÁËÏÊ ÂÉÚÎÅÓÍÅÎ. · ðÓÉÈÏÌÏÇÉÞÅÓËÉÅ ÏÓÏÂÅÎÎÏÓÔÉ ÔÁËÔÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ É ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÍÙÛÌÅÎÉÑ. 1. áÎÁÌÉÚ ÓÉÓÔÅÍÙ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ × ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ. 2. þÔÏ ÍÅÎÑÔØ × ÓÉÓÔÅÍÅ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ. 3. üÔÁÐÙ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÐÌÁÎÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÑ. 4. æÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÅ ×ÉÄÅÎÉÑ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ. 5. üÌÅÍÅÎÔÙ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ: · ÍÉÓÓÉÑ ËÏÍÐÁÎÉÉ (ÍÉÆ ÉÌÉ ÒÅÁÌØÎÏÓÔØ) · ÆÉÌÏÓÏÆÉÑ ÂÉÚÎÅÓÁ (ÉÄÅÏÌÏÇÉÑ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ, ËÏÒÐÏÒÁÔÉ×ÎÁÑ ËÕÌØÔÕÒÁ) · ÐÏÓÔÁÎÏ×ËÁ ÃÅÌÅÊ (ÜÆÆÅËÔÉ×ÎÙÅ ÔÅÈÎÏÌÏÇÉÉ ÉÚ ÐÓÉÈÏÌÏÇÉÉ É ÍÅÎÅÄÖÍÅÎÔÁ) · ×ÉÄÙ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÊ: ËÏÒÐÏÒÁÔÉ×ÎÁÑ, ÄÅÌÏ×ÁÑ, ÆÕÎËÃÉÏÎÁÌØÎÙÅ, ÏÐÅÒÁÃÉÏÎÎÙÅ · ÒÁÚÒÁÂÏÔËÁ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÊ (ÐÕÔÉ ÄÏÓÔÉÖÅÎÉÑ ÃÅÌÅÊ) · ×ÉÄÙ ÏÒÇÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒ (ÍÅÈÁÎÉÚÍ ÒÅÁÌÉÚÁÃÉÉ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÊ) 6. ðÌÁÎ ÎÅÏÂÈÏÄÉÍÙÈ ÄÅÊÓÔ×ÉÊ ÄÌÑ ×ÎÅÄÒÅÎÉÑ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÊ. 7. æÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÅ ÒÁÂÏÞÅÊ ËÏÍÁÎÄÙ ÄÌÑ ×ÎÅÄÒÅÎÉÑ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÊ. · ××ÏÄ ÐÁÒÁÌÌÅÌØÎÏÊ ÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÙ · ÍÏÔÉ×ÁÃÉÑ ÐÅÒÓÏÎÁÌÁ · ÇÒÁÆÉË ×ÎÅÄÒÅÎÉÑ · ËÏÎÔÒÏÌØ ÐÒÏÃÅÓÓÁ. 8. éÎÓÔÒÕÍÅÎÔÁÒÉÊ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÎÔÏ×- ÍÅÔÏÄÉËÉ É ÔÅÈÎÏÌÏÇÉÉ (ËÁË ×ÙÑÓÎÑÔØ ÐÒÉÞÉÎÙ É ÎÁÈÏÄÉÔØ ÒÅÛÅÎÉÑ): - ÍÁÔÒÉÃÁ ÓÏÓÔÏÑÎÉÑ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ, ËÁË ÜËÓÐÒÅÓÓ ÄÉÁÇÎÏÓÔÉËÁ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ · ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÉÊ ÐÏÔÅÎÃÉÁÌ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ · ÕÒÏ×ÎÉ ÌÏÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÐÏÓÔÒÏÅÎÉÑ ÂÉÚÎÅÓÁ - ÏÐÒÅÄÅÌÅÎÉÅ ÐÒÏÂÌÅÍÎÏÇÏ ÐÏÌÑ É ÓÏÚÄÁÎÉÅ ÒÅÛÅÎÉÊ - ÉÓÔÏÒÉÑ ÒÁÚ×ÉÔÉÑ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ - S.W.O.T. ÁÎÁÌÉÚ - ô.ï.ô.å. É S.C.O.R.E. - ÔÅÈÎÉËÉ ÓÂÏÒÁ ÉÎÆÏÒÍÁÃÉÉ É ÐÏÓÔÁÎÏ×ËÉ ÃÅÌÅÊ. - ËÏÎÃÅÐÔÕÁÌØÎÏÅ ÒÁÂÏÞÅÅ ÐÒÏÓÔÒÁÎÓÔ×Ï ÄÌÑ ÆÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÑ ×ÎÅÄÒÑÅÍÙÈ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÊ õ ÷ÁÓ ÅÓÔØ ÒÅÁÌØÎÁÑ ×ÏÚÍÏÖÎÏÓÔØ ÓÔÁÔØ ÂÏÌÅÅ ÜÆÆÅËÔÉ×ÎÙÍ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÑÀÝÉÍ!!! ÷Ï ×ÒÅÍÑ ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÁ ÒÁÓÓÍÁÔÒÉ×ÁÀÔÓÑ ÒÅÁÌØÎÙÅ ÓÌÕÞÁÉ ÉÚ ÐÒÁËÔÉËÉ ÒÁÂÏÔÙ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÎÔÁ É ÒÁÚÂÉÒÁÀÔÓÑ ËÏÎËÒÅÔÎÙÅ ÓÉÔÕÁÃÉÉ ÉÚ ÏÐÙÔÁ ÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÏ× ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÁ. ôÅÏÒÉÑ ÐÒÏÒÁÂÁÔÙ×ÁÅÔÓÑ, ÞÅÒÅÚ ÕÐÒÁÖÎÅÎÉÑ É ÚÁÄÁÎÉÑ, É ÐÏÓÌÅ ÒÅÚÕÌØÔÁÔÙ ÒÁÚÂÉÒÁÀÔÓÑ × ÇÒÕÐÐÅ É ËÏÍÍÅÎÔÉÒÕÀÔÓÑ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÎÔÏÍ. õ ÷ÁÓ ÅÓÔØ ÒÅÄËÁÑ É ÕÎÉËÁÌØÎÁÑ ×ÏÚÍÏÖÎÏÓÔØ ÒÁÚÒÁÂÏÔÁÔØ ÐÌÁÎ ÄÅÊÓÔ×ÉÊ ÐÏ ÐÏÓÔÁÎÏ×ËÅ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ ËÏÎËÒÅÔÎÏ ÄÌÑ Ó×ÏÅÊ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ, ÏÂÍÅÎÑÔØÓÑ ÏÐÙÔÏÍ Ó ÄÒÕÇÉÍÉ ÒÕËÏ×ÏÄÉÔÅÌÑÍÉ É ÐÏÌÕÞÉÔØ ËÏÎÓÕÌØÔÁÃÉÉ × ÏÂÌÁÓÔÉ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ËÏÎÓÁÌÔÉÎÇÁ. úÁÍÏÔÉ×ÉÒÕÊÔÅ ÓÅÂÑ ÎÁ ÄÉÎÁÍÉËÕ É ÐÏÌÕÞÉÔÅ ÒÅÚÕÌØÔÁÔ!!! ðÏ ÏËÏÎÞÁÎÉÉ ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒÁ ÕÞÁÓÔÎÉËÉ ÓÍÏÇÕÔ: - óÁÍÏÓÔÏÑÔÅÌØÎÏ ÐÒÏ×ÏÄÉÔØ ÒÅÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÉÚÁÃÉÀ - óÏÚÄÁ×ÁÔØ "Vision", "æÉÌÏÓÏÆÉÀ" ËÏÍÐÁÎÉÉ. - óÔÁ×ÉÔØ ÃÅÌÉ É ÒÁÚÒÁÂÁÔÙ×ÁÔØ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÉ. - ðÒÁ×ÉÌØÎÏ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÏ×Ù×ÁÔØ ÒÁÂÏÔÕ ×ÎÕÔÒÉ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ. - ëÁÞÅÓÔ×ÅÎÎÏ ×ÎÅÄÒÑÔØ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÑ. - ðÏÌÕÞÁÔ Õ×ÅÒÅÎÎÏÓÔØ × Ó×ÏÉÈ ÄÅÊÓÔ×ÉÑÈ ÐÏ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÀ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÅÊ. - éÚÂÁ×ÑÔÓÑ ÏÔ ÓÏÓÔÏÑÎÉÑ ÎÅÏÐÒÅÄÅÌÅÎÎÏÓÔÉ É ÓÔÒÁÈÁ. óÐÅÛÉÔÅ ÕÓÐÅÔØ!!! (íÁËÓÉÍÁÌØÎÁÑ ÞÉÓÌÅÎÎÏÓÔØ ÇÒÕÐÐÙ 10 ÞÅÌÏ×ÅË)!!! úÁÐÉÓÁÔØÓÑ ÎÁ ÓÅÍÉÎÁÒ É ÕÚÎÁÔØ ÂÏÌÅÅ ÐÏÄÒÏÂÎÕÀ ÉÎÆÏÒÍÁÃÉÀ ÍÏÖÎÏ ÐÏ ÔÅÌÅÆÏÎÕ (095)933-68-98 - ËÏÎÓÁÌÔÉÎÇÏ×ÁÑ ËÏÍÐÁÎÉÑ "áòô". (ÐÒÏÓÉÍ ÷ÁÓ ÐÅÒÅÚ×ÏÎÉÔØ ÌÉÞÎÏ, ÔÁË ËÁË ÏÔ×ÅÔ ÐÏ ÉÎÔÅÒÎÅÔ ÍÏÖÅÔ ÎÅ ÄÏÊÔÉ) òÁÓÐÉÓÁÎÉÅ ÎÁÛÉÈ ÓÌÅÄÕÀÝÉÈ ÔÒÅÎÉÎÇÏ×: 20-21 ÓÅÎÔÑÂÒÑ "óÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÑ É ÔÁËÔÉËÉ ÌÉÞÎÙÈ ÐÒÏÄÁÖÉ" (ÌÉÃÏÍ Ë ËÌÉÅÎÔÕ ÏÄÉÎ ÎÁ ÏÄÉÎ) 27-28 ÓÅÎÔÑÂÒÑ "üÆÆÅËÔÉ×ÎÙÅ ÐÅÒÅÇÏ×ÏÒÙ" ïÂÕÞÁÅÍ ÐÅÒÓÏÎÁÌ ÎÁ ÔÒÅÎÉÎÇÁÈ, ÒÁÚÒÁÂÏÔÁÎÎÙÈ ÄÌÑ ÷ÁÛÅÊ ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ: -ÐÒÏÄÁÖÉ -ÐÅÒÅÇÏ×ÏÒÙ -ÔÅÌÅÆÏÎÎÏÅ ÏÂÝÅÎÉÅ -ÓÅÒ×ÉÓ ÏÂÓÌÕÖÉ×ÁÎÉÑ -ÍÏÔÉ×ÁÃÉÑ îÁÛÉ ÕÓÌÕÇÉ: -æÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÅ ÏÒÇÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÙ -÷ÎÅÄÒÅÎÉÅ ÉÚÍÅÎÅÎÉÊ ÎÁ ÐÒÅÄÐÒÉÑÔÉÉ -æÏÒÍÉÒÏ×ÁÎÉÅ ËÏÒÐÏÒÁÔÉ×ÎÏÊ ËÕÌØÔÕÒÙ -ðÏÓÔÁÎÏ×ËÁ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÞÅÓËÏÇÏ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ × ÏÒÇÁÎÉÚÁÃÉÉ -òÁÚÒÁÂÏÔËÁ ÓÔÒÁÔÅÇÉÊ -äÉÁÇÎÏÓÔÉËÁ ÂÉÚÎÅÓÁ -ïÐÔÉÍÉÚÁÃÉÑ ÓÔÒÕËÔÕÒÙ ÕÐÒÁ×ÌÅÎÉÑ -òÁÚÒÁÂÏÔËÁ ËÏÎËÕÒÅÎÔÎÙÈ ÐÒÅÉÍÕÝÅÓÔ× öÅÌÁÅÍ ÕÄÁÞÎÏÇÏ ÂÉÚÎÅÓÁ É ÖÄÅÍ ×ÓÔÒÅÞÉ Ó ÷ÁÍÉ!!! P.S. ðÒÉÎÏÓÉÍ Ó×ÏÉ ÉÚ×ÉÎÅÎÉÑ, ÚÁ ÒÅËÌÁÍÕ Ó×ÏÉÈ ÕÓÌÕÇ ÔÁËÉÍ ÓÐÏÓÏÂÏÍ Ó×ÑÚÉ! ëÁË ÐÏËÁÚÁÌ ÏÐÒÏÓ ÓÒÅÄÉ ÐÏÌØÚÏ×ÁÔÅÌÅÊ ÓÅÔÉ éîôåòîåô- ÜÔÏÔ ÓÐÏÓÏÂ Ó×ÑÚÉ Ó ÐÏÔÅÎÃÉÁÌØÎÙÍ ËÌÉÅÎÔÏÍ Ñ×ÌÑÅÔÓÑ ÎÁ ÄÁÎÎÙÊ ÍÏÍÅÎÔ 2-Í ÐÏÓÌÅ ÔÅÌÅ×ÉÄÅÎÉÑ ÐÏ ÜÆÆÅËÔÉ×ÎÏÓÔÉ. ðÏÜÔÏÍÕ, ÅÓÌÉ ÷ÁÓ ÎÅ ÚÁÉÎÔÅÒÅÓÏ×ÁÌÉ ÎÁÛÉ ÕÓÌÕÇÉ, ÔÏ ÐÒÏÓÔÏ "ÐÅÒÅËÌÀÞÉÔÅ ËÁÎÁÌ", ËÁË ÷Ù ÏÂÙÞÎÏ ÄÅÌÁÅÔÅ ÐÒÉ ÐÒÏÓÍÏÔÒÅ ÔÅÌÅ×ÉÚÏÒÁ (Ô.Å. ÕÄÁÌÉÔÅ ÜÔÏ ÐÉÓØÍÏ ÉÚ Ó×ÏÅÇÏ ÑÝÉËÁ - ×ÏÔ É ×ÓÅ, É ÎÅ ÎÁÄÏ ÚÌÉÔÓÑ É ÎÅÒ×ÎÉÞÁÔØ, ÐÒÏÓÔÏ ÕÌÙÂÎÉÔÅÓØ :-) - ÏÔ ÜÔÏÇÏ ÂÏÌØÛÅ ÐÏÌØÚÙ) óÐÁÓÉÂÏ ÚÁ ÷ÁÛÅ ÐÏÎÉÍÁÎÉÅ!!! ÷ÁÛ ÁÄÒÅÓ ×ÚÑÔ ÉÚ ÜÌÅËÔÒÏÎÎÏÇÏ ÓÐÒÁ×ÏÞÎÉËÁ "÷ÓÑ òÏÓÓÉÑ × éÎÔÅÒÎÅÔ" (ÏÂÎÏ×ÌÅÎÉÅ 1 ÓÅÎÔÑÂÒÑ 2001Ç.) äÁÎÎÁÑ ÉÎÆÏÒÍÁÃÉÑ ×ÙÓÙÌÁÅÔÓÑ ÏÄÉÎ ÒÁÚ, É ÂÏÌØÛÅ ÐÏ×ÔÏÒÑÔÓÑ, ÎÅ ÂÕÄÅÔ! (ÈÏÔÑ ×ÏÚÍÏÖÎÙ ÓÂÏÉ × ÒÁÂÏÔÅ ÐÒÏÇÒÁÍÍÎÏÇÏ ÏÂÅÓÐÅÞÅÎÉÑ É ÷Ù ÍÏÖÅÔÅ ÐÏÌÕÞÉÔØ ÎÅÓËÏÌØËÏ ËÏÐÉÊ ÄÁÎÎÏÇÏ ÐÉÓØÍÁ - ÍÁÛÉÎÙ ÔÏÖÅ ÍÏÇÕÔ ÏÛÉÂÁÔØÓÑ :-) WIN........................ WIN.............................. WIN Íà ñòîë ðóêîâîäèòåëþ - ëè÷íî è ñðî÷íî! Íàñòàëî âðåìÿ ïîäâåñòè èòîã ðåçóëüòàòîâ è çàïëàíèðîâàòü áóäóùåå ïåðåä íà÷àëîì äåëîâîé àêòèâíîñòè!!! ñåìèíàð "ÏÐÎÐÛÂ Â ÓÏÐÀÂËÅÍÈÈ" - âîò, ÷òî ïîìîæåò... Ñåìèíàð ïðåäíàçíà÷åí äëÿ ðóêîâîäèòåëåé îðãàíèçàöèé. Îí äàåò çíàíèÿ è ìåòîäèêè ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî ïëàíèðîâàíèÿ è âíåäðåíèÿ èçìåíåíèé, êàê è ÷òî íóæíî ìåíÿòü â îðãàíèçàöèè äëÿ óñïåøíîãî ðàçâèòèÿ. Ñåìèíàð áóäåò èíòåðåñåí â ïåðâóþ î÷åðåäü òåì, êòî ïîñòîÿííî çàäàåò ñåáå âîïðîñû: - êàê äàëüøå ðàçâèâàòüñÿ? - Êàê æèòü ñåé÷àñ, ïðè òàêîì õàîñå â óïðàâëåíèè è òàêîé òåêó÷êå â äåëàõ? - ÷òî ìîæíî èçìåíèòü â îðãàíèçàöèè äëÿ óëó÷øåíèÿ ñèòóàöèè? Ïðîãðàììà ñåìèíàðà ðàçðàáîòàíà íà îñíîâå îïûòà ðåôîðìèðîâàíèÿ Ðîññèéñêèõ ïðåäïðèÿòèé è âåäåò åž êîíñóëüòàíò ïî îðãàíèçàöèîííîìó ðàçâèòèþ, àâòîð ìíîãèõ ñòàòåé â îáëàñòè óïðàâëåíèÿ, ïðåïîäàâàòåëü êóðñà "Ñòðàòåãè÷åñêèé ìåíåäæìåíò" äëÿ M.B.A â "ÌÈÐÁÈÑ" ÷åëîâåê ñ 5 ëåòíèì îïûòîì ðàáîòû íà ðóêîâîäÿùèõ äîëæíîñòÿõ!!! Ñåìèíàð ïðîéäåò 13 è 14 ñåíòÿáðÿ â Ìîñêâå, â Èíñòèòóòå Îðãàíèçàöèîííîãî êîíñóëüòèðîâàíèÿ. Ñîäåðæàíèå ñåìèíàðà: · Êòî òàêîé ïðåäïðèíèìàòåëü è êòî òàêîé áèçíåñìåí. · Ïñèõîëîãè÷åñêèå îñîáåííîñòè òàêòè÷åñêîãî è ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî ìûøëåíèÿ. 1. Àíàëèç ñèñòåìû óïðàâëåíèÿ â îðãàíèçàöèè. 2. ×òî ìåíÿòü â ñèñòåìå óïðàâëåíèÿ. 3. Ýòàïû ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî ïëàíèðîâàíèÿ. 4. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå âèäåíèÿ îðãàíèçàöèè. 5. Ýëåìåíòû ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî óïðàâëåíèÿ: · ìèññèÿ êîìïàíèè (ìèô èëè ðåàëüíîñòü) · ôèëîñîôèÿ áèçíåñà (èäåîëîãèÿ îðãàíèçàöèè, êîðïîðàòèâíàÿ êóëüòóðà) · ïîñòàíîâêà öåëåé (ýôôåêòèâíûå òåõíîëîãèè èç ïñèõîëîãèè è ìåíåäæìåíòà) · âèäû ñòðàòåãèé: êîðïîðàòèâíàÿ, äåëîâàÿ, ôóíêöèîíàëüíûå, îïåðàöèîííûå · ðàçðàáîòêà ñòðàòåãèé (ïóòè äîñòèæåíèÿ öåëåé) · âèäû îðãñòðóêòóð (ìåõàíèçì ðåàëèçàöèè ñòðàòåãèé) 6. Ïëàí íåîáõîäèìûõ äåéñòâèé äëÿ âíåäðåíèÿ èçìåíåíèé. 7. Ôîðìèðîâàíèå ðàáî÷åé êîìàíäû äëÿ âíåäðåíèÿ èçìåíåíèé. · ââîä ïàðàëëåëüíîé ñòðóêòóðû · ìîòèâàöèÿ ïåðñîíàëà · ãðàôèê âíåäðåíèÿ · êîíòðîëü ïðîöåññà. 8. Èíñòðóìåíòàðèé êîíñóëüòàíòîâ- ìåòîäèêè è òåõíîëîãèè (êàê âûÿñíÿòü ïðè÷èíû è íàõîäèòü ðåøåíèÿ): - ìàòðèöà ñîñòîÿíèÿ îðãàíèçàöèè, êàê ýêñïðåññ äèàãíîñòèêà îðãàíèçàöèè · ñòðàòåãè÷åñêèé ïîòåíöèàë îðãàíèçàöèè · óðîâíè ëîãè÷åñêîãî ïîñòðîåíèÿ áèçíåñà - îïðåäåëåíèå ïðîáëåìíîãî ïîëÿ è ñîçäàíèå ðåøåíèé - èñòîðèÿ ðàçâèòèÿ îðãàíèçàöèè - S.W.O.T. àíàëèç - Ò.Î.Ò.Å. è S.C.O.R.E. - òåõíèêè ñáîðà èíôîðìàöèè è ïîñòàíîâêè öåëåé. - êîíöåïòóàëüíîå ðàáî÷åå ïðîñòðàíñòâî äëÿ ôîðìèðîâàíèÿ âíåäðÿåìûõ èçìåíåíèé Ó Âàñ åñòü ðåàëüíàÿ âîçìîæíîñòü ñòàòü áîëåå ýôôåêòèâíûì óïðàâëÿþùèì!!! Âî âðåìÿ ñåìèíàðà ðàññìàòðèâàþòñÿ ðåàëüíûå ñëó÷àè èç ïðàêòèêè ðàáîòû êîíñóëüòàíòà è ðàçáèðàþòñÿ êîíêðåòíûå ñèòóàöèè èç îïûòà ó÷àñòíèêîâ ñåìèíàðà. Òåîðèÿ ïðîðàáàòûâàåòñÿ, ÷åðåç óïðàæíåíèÿ è çàäàíèÿ, è ïîñëå ðåçóëüòàòû ðàçáèðàþòñÿ â ãðóïïå è êîììåíòèðóþòñÿ êîíñóëüòàíòîì. Ó Âàñ åñòü ðåäêàÿ è óíèêàëüíàÿ âîçìîæíîñòü ðàçðàáîòàòü ïëàí äåéñòâèé ïî ïîñòàíîâêå ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî óïðàâëåíèÿ êîíêðåòíî äëÿ ñâîåé îðãàíèçàöèè, îáìåíÿòüñÿ îïûòîì ñ äðóãèìè ðóêîâîäèòåëÿìè è ïîëó÷èòü êîíñóëüòàöèè â îáëàñòè óïðàâëåí÷åñêîãî êîíñàëòèíãà. Çàìîòèâèðóéòå ñåáÿ íà äèíàìèêó è ïîëó÷èòå ðåçóëüòàò!!! Ïî îêîí÷àíèè ñåìèíàðà ó÷àñòíèêè ñìîãóò: - Ñàìîñòîÿòåëüíî ïðîâîäèòü ðåñòðóêòóðèçàöèþ - Ñîçäàâàòü "Vision", "Ôèëîñîôèþ" êîìïàíèè. - Ñòàâèòü öåëè è ðàçðàáàòûâàòü ñòðàòåãèè. - Ïðàâèëüíî îðãàíèçîâûâàòü ðàáîòó âíóòðè îðãàíèçàöèè. - Êà÷åñòâåííî âíåäðÿòü èçìåíåíèÿ. - Ïîëó÷àò óâåðåííîñòü â ñâîèõ äåéñòâèÿõ ïî óïðàâëåíèþ îðãàíèçàöèåé. - Èçáàâÿòñÿ îò ñîñòîÿíèÿ íåîïðåäåëåííîñòè è ñòðàõà. Ñïåøèòå óñïåòü!!! (Ìàêñèìàëüíàÿ ÷èñëåííîñòü ãðóïïû 10 ÷åëîâåê)!!! Çàïèñàòüñÿ íà ñåìèíàð è óçíàòü áîëåå ïîäðîáíóþ èíôîðìàöèþ ìîæíî ïî òåëåôîíó (095)933-68-98 - êîíñàëòèíãîâàÿ êîìïàíèÿ "ÀÐÒ". (ïðîñèì Âàñ ïåðåçâîíèòü ëè÷íî, òàê êàê îòâåò ïî èíòåðíåò ìîæåò íå äîéòè) Ðàñïèñàíèå íàøèõ ñëåäóþùèõ òðåíèíãîâ: 20-21 ñåíòÿáðÿ "Ñòðàòåãèÿ è òàêòèêè ëè÷íûõ ïðîäàæè" (ëèöîì ê êëèåíòó îäèí íà îäèí) 27-28 ñåíòÿáðÿ "Ýôôåêòèâíûå ïåðåãîâîðû" Îáó÷àåì ïåðñîíàë íà òðåíèíãàõ, ðàçðàáîòàííûõ äëÿ Âàøåé îðãàíèçàöèè: -ïðîäàæè -ïåðåãîâîðû -òåëåôîííîå îáùåíèå -ñåðâèñ îáñëóæèâàíèÿ -ìîòèâàöèÿ Íàøè óñëóãè: -Ôîðìèðîâàíèå îðãñòðóêòóðû -Âíåäðåíèå èçìåíåíèé íà ïðåäïðèÿòèè -Ôîðìèðîâàíèå êîðïîðàòèâíîé êóëüòóðû -Ïîñòàíîâêà ñòðàòåãè÷åñêîãî óïðàâëåíèÿ â îðãàíèçàöèè -Ðàçðàáîòêà ñòðàòåãèé -Äèàãíîñòèêà áèçíåñà -Îïòèìèçàöèÿ ñòðóêòóðû óïðàâëåíèÿ -Ðàçðàáîòêà êîíêóðåíòíûõ ïðåèìóùåñòâ Æåëàåì óäà÷íîãî áèçíåñà è æäåì âñòðå÷è ñ Âàìè!!! P.S. Ïðèíîñèì ñâîè èçâèíåíèÿ, çà ðåêëàìó ñâîèõ óñëóã òàêèì ñïîñîáîì ñâÿçè! Êàê ïîêàçàë îïðîñ ñðåäè ïîëüçîâàòåëåé ñåòè ÈÍÒÅÐÍÅÒ- ýòîò ñïîñîá ñâÿçè ñ ïîòåíöèàëüíûì êëèåíòîì ÿâëÿåòñÿ íà äàííûé ìîìåíò 2-ì ïîñëå òåëåâèäåíèÿ ïî ýôôåêòèâíîñòè. Ïîýòîìó, åñëè Âàñ íå çàèíòåðåñîâàëè íàøè óñëóãè, òî ïðîñòî "ïåðåêëþ÷èòå êàíàë", êàê Âû îáû÷íî äåëàåòå ïðè ïðîñìîòðå òåëåâèçîðà (ò.å. óäàëèòå ýòî ïèñüìî èç ñâîåãî ÿùèêà - âîò è âñå, è íå íàäî çëèòñÿ è íåðâíè÷àòü, ïðîñòî óëûáíèòåñü :-) - îò ýòîãî áîëüøå ïîëüçû) Ñïàñèáî çà Âàøå ïîíèìàíèå!!! Âàø àäðåñ âçÿò èç ýëåêòðîííîãî ñïðàâî÷íèêà "Âñÿ Ðîññèÿ â Èíòåðíåò" (îáíîâëåíèå 1 ñåíòÿáðÿ 2001ã.) Äàííàÿ èíôîðìàöèÿ âûñûëàåòñÿ îäèí ðàç, è áîëüøå ïîâòîðÿòñÿ, íå áóäåò! (õîòÿ âîçìîæíû ñáîè â ðàáîòå ïðîãðàììíîãî îáåñïå÷åíèÿ è Âû ìîæåòå ïîëó÷èòü íåñêîëüêî êîïèé äàííîãî ïèñüìà - ìàøèíû òîæå ìîãóò îøèáàòüñÿ :-) DOS.......................... DOS............................ DOS áâ®« àãª®¢®€šâ¥«î - «šç® š áà®ç®! áâ «® ¢à¥¬ï ¯®€¢¥áâš šâ®£ à¥§ã«ìâ â®¢ š § ¯« šà®¢ âì ¡ã€ãé¥¥ ¯¥à¥€ ç «®¬ €¥«®¢®© ªâš¢®áâš!!! á¥¬š à " " - ¢®â, çâ® ¯®¬®Š¥â... ¥¬š à ¯à¥€ § ç¥ €«ï àãª®¢®€šâ¥«¥© ®à£ š§ æš©. € ¥â § šï š ¬¥â®€šªš áâà â¥£šç¥áª®£® ¯« šà®¢ šï š ¢¥€à¥šï š§¬¥¥š©, ª ª š çâ® ãŠ® ¬¥ïâì ¢ ®à£ š§ æšš €«ï ãá¯¥è®£® à §¢šâšï. ¥¬š à ¡ã€¥â šâ¥à¥á¥ ¢ ¯¥à¢ãî ®ç¥à¥€ì â¥¬, ªâ® ¯®áâ®ï® § € ¥â á¥¡¥ ¢®¯à®áë: - ª ª € «ìè¥ à §¢š¢ âìáï? - ª Ššâì á¥©ç á, ¯àš â ª®¬ å ®á¥ ¢ ã¯à ¢«¥šš š â ª®© â¥ªãçª¥ ¢ €¥« å? - çâ® ¬®Š® š§¬¥šâì ¢ ®à£ š§ æšš €«ï ã«ãçè¥šï ášâã æšš? à®£à ¬¬ á¥¬š à à §à ¡®â ®á®¢¥ ®¯ëâ à¥ä®à¬šà®¢ šï ®ááš©áªšå ¯à¥€¯àšïâš© š ¢¥€¥â ¥ñ ª®áã«ìâ â ¯® ®à£ š§ æš®®¬ã à §¢šâšî, ¢â®à ¬®£šå áâ â¥© ¢ ®¡« áâš ã¯à ¢«¥šï, ¯à¥¯®€ ¢ â¥«ì ªãàá "âà â¥£šç¥áªš© ¬¥¥€Š¬¥â" €«ï M.B.A ¢ "" ç¥«®¢¥ª á 5 «¥âš¬ ®¯ëâ®¬ à ¡®âë àãª®¢®€ïéšå €®«Š®áâïå!!! ¥¬š à ¯à®©€¥â 13 š 14 á¥âï¡àï ¢ ®áª¢¥, ¢ áâšâãâ¥ à£ š§ æš®®£® ª®áã«ìâšà®¢ šï. ®€¥àŠ š¥ á¥¬š à : · â® â ª®© ¯à¥€¯àšš¬ â¥«ì š ªâ® â ª®© ¡š§¥á¬¥. · ášå®«®£šç¥áªš¥ ®á®¡¥®áâš â ªâšç¥áª®£® š áâà â¥£šç¥áª®£® ¬ëè«¥šï. 1. «š§ ášáâ¥¬ë ã¯à ¢«¥šï ¢ ®à£ š§ æšš. 2. â® ¬¥ïâì ¢ ášáâ¥¬¥ ã¯à ¢«¥šï. 3. â ¯ë áâà â¥£šç¥áª®£® ¯« šà®¢ šï. 4. ®à¬šà®¢ š¥ ¢š€¥šï ®à£ š§ æšš. 5. «¥¬¥âë áâà â¥£šç¥áª®£® ã¯à ¢«¥šï: · ¬šáášï ª®¬¯ šš (¬šä š«š à¥ «ì®áâì) · äš«®á®äšï ¡š§¥á (š€¥®«®£šï ®à£ š§ æšš, ª®à¯®à âš¢ ï ªã«ìâãà ) · ¯®áâ ®¢ª æ¥«¥© (íää¥ªâš¢ë¥ â¥å®«®£šš š§ ¯ášå®«®£šš š ¬¥¥€Š¬¥â ) · ¢š€ë áâà â¥£š©: ª®à¯®à âš¢ ï, €¥«®¢ ï, äãªæš® «ìë¥, ®¯¥à æš®ë¥ · à §à ¡®âª áâà â¥£š© (¯ãâš €®áâšŠ¥šï æ¥«¥©) · ¢š€ë ®à£áâàãªâãà (¬¥å š§¬ à¥ «š§ æšš áâà â¥£š©) 6. « ¥®¡å®€š¬ëå €¥©áâ¢š© €«ï ¢¥€à¥šï š§¬¥¥š©. 7. ®à¬šà®¢ š¥ à ¡®ç¥© ª®¬ €ë €«ï ¢¥€à¥šï š§¬¥¥š©. · ¢¢®€ ¯ à ««¥«ì®© áâàãªâãàë · ¬®âš¢ æšï ¯¥àá® « · £à äšª ¢¥€à¥šï · ª®âà®«ì ¯à®æ¥áá . 8. áâàã¬¥â àš© ª®áã«ìâ â®¢- ¬¥â®€šªš š â¥å®«®£šš (ª ª ¢ëïáïâì ¯àšçšë š å®€šâì à¥è¥šï): - ¬ âàšæ á®áâ®ïšï ®à£ š§ æšš, ª ª íªá¯à¥áá €š £®áâšª ®à£ š§ æšš · áâà â¥£šç¥áªš© ¯®â¥æš « ®à£ š§ æšš · ãà®¢š «®£šç¥áª®£® ¯®áâà®¥šï ¡š§¥á - ®¯à¥€¥«¥š¥ ¯à®¡«¥¬®£® ¯®«ï š á®§€ š¥ à¥è¥š© - šáâ®àšï à §¢šâšï ®à£ š§ æšš - S.W.O.T. «š§ - .... š S.C.O.R.E. - â¥åšªš á¡®à šä®à¬ æšš š ¯®áâ ®¢ªš æ¥«¥©. - ª®æ¥¯âã «ì®¥ à ¡®ç¥¥ ¯à®áâà áâ¢® €«ï ä®à¬šà®¢ šï ¢¥€àï¥¬ëå š§¬¥¥š© á ¥áâì à¥ «ì ï ¢®§¬®Š®áâì áâ âì ¡®«¥¥ íää¥ªâš¢ë¬ ã¯à ¢«ïîéš¬!!! ® ¢à¥¬ï á¥¬š à à áá¬ âàš¢ îâáï à¥ «ìë¥ á«ãç š š§ ¯à ªâšªš à ¡®âë ª®áã«ìâ â š à §¡šà îâáï ª®ªà¥âë¥ ášâã æšš š§ ®¯ëâ ãç áâšª®¢ á¥¬š à . ¥®àšï ¯à®à ¡ âë¢ ¥âáï, ç¥à¥§ ã¯à Š¥šï š § € šï, š ¯®á«¥ à¥§ã«ìâ âë à §¡šà îâáï ¢ £àã¯¯¥ š ª®¬¬¥âšàãîâáï ª®áã«ìâ â®¬. á ¥áâì à¥€ª ï š ãšª «ì ï ¢®§¬®Š®áâì à §à ¡®â âì ¯« €¥©áâ¢š© ¯® ¯®áâ ®¢ª¥ áâà â¥£šç¥áª®£® ã¯à ¢«¥šï ª®ªà¥â® €«ï á¢®¥© ®à£ š§ æšš, ®¡¬¥ïâìáï ®¯ëâ®¬ á €àã£š¬š àãª®¢®€šâ¥«ï¬š š ¯®«ãçšâì ª®áã«ìâ æšš ¢ ®¡« áâš ã¯à ¢«¥ç¥áª®£® ª®á «âš£ . ¬®âš¢šàã©â¥ á¥¡ï €š ¬šªã š ¯®«ãçšâ¥ à¥§ã«ìâ â!!! ® ®ª®ç šš á¥¬š à ãç áâšªš á¬®£ãâ: - ¬®áâ®ïâ¥«ì® ¯à®¢®€šâì à¥áâàãªâãàš§ æšî - ®§€ ¢ âì "Vision", "š«®á®äšî" ª®¬¯ šš. - â ¢šâì æ¥«š š à §à ¡ âë¢ âì áâà â¥£šš. - à ¢š«ì® ®à£ š§®¢ë¢ âì à ¡®âã ¢ãâàš ®à£ š§ æšš. - ç¥áâ¢¥® ¢¥€àïâì š§¬¥¥šï. - ®«ãç â ã¢¥à¥®áâì ¢ á¢®šå €¥©áâ¢šïå ¯® ã¯à ¢«¥šî ®à£ š§ æš¥©. - §¡ ¢ïâáï ®â á®áâ®ïšï ¥®¯à¥€¥«¥®áâš š áâà å . ¯¥èšâ¥ ãá¯¥âì!!! ( ªáš¬ «ì ï çšá«¥®áâì £àã¯¯ë 10 ç¥«®¢¥ª)!!! ¯šá âìáï á¥¬š à š ã§ âì ¡®«¥¥ ¯®€à®¡ãî šä®à¬ æšî ¬®Š® ¯® â¥«¥ä®ã (095)933-68-98 - ª®á «âš£®¢ ï ª®¬¯ šï "". (¯à®áš¬ á ¯¥à¥§¢®šâì «šç®, â ª ª ª ®â¢¥â ¯® šâ¥à¥â ¬®Š¥â ¥ €®©âš) á¯šá š¥ èšå á«¥€ãîéšå âà¥š£®¢: 20-21 á¥âï¡àï "âà â¥£šï š â ªâšªš «šçëå ¯à®€ Šš" («šæ®¬ ª ª«š¥âã ®€š ®€š) 27-28 á¥âï¡àï "ää¥ªâš¢ë¥ ¯¥à¥£®¢®àë" ¡ãç ¥¬ ¯¥àá® « âà¥š£ å, à §à ¡®â ëå €«ï è¥© ®à£ š§ æšš: -¯à®€ Šš -¯¥à¥£®¢®àë -â¥«¥ä®®¥ ®¡é¥š¥ -á¥à¢šá ®¡á«ãŠš¢ šï -¬®âš¢ æšï èš ãá«ã£š: -®à¬šà®¢ š¥ ®à£áâàãªâãàë -¥€à¥š¥ š§¬¥¥š© ¯à¥€¯àšïâšš -®à¬šà®¢ š¥ ª®à¯®à âš¢®© ªã«ìâãàë -®áâ ®¢ª áâà â¥£šç¥áª®£® ã¯à ¢«¥šï ¢ ®à£ š§ æšš - §à ¡®âª áâà â¥£š© -š £®áâšª ¡š§¥á -¯âš¬š§ æšï áâàãªâãàë ã¯à ¢«¥šï - §à ¡®âª ª®ªãà¥âëå ¯à¥š¬ãé¥áâ¢ ¥« ¥¬ ã€ ç®£® ¡š§¥á š Š€¥¬ ¢áâà¥çš á ¬š!!! P.S. àš®áš¬ á¢®š š§¢š¥šï, § à¥ª« ¬ã á¢®šå ãá«ã£ â ªš¬ á¯®á®¡®¬ á¢ï§š! ª ¯®ª § « ®¯à®á áà¥€š ¯®«ì§®¢ â¥«¥© á¥âš - íâ®â á¯®á®¡ á¢ï§š á ¯®â¥æš «ìë¬ ª«š¥â®¬ ï¢«ï¥âáï € ë© ¬®¬¥â 2-¬ ¯®á«¥ â¥«¥¢š€¥šï ¯® íää¥ªâš¢®áâš. ®íâ®¬ã, ¥á«š á ¥ § šâ¥à¥á®¢ «š èš ãá«ã£š, â® ¯à®áâ® "¯¥à¥ª«îçšâ¥ ª «", ª ª ë ®¡ëç® €¥« ¥â¥ ¯àš ¯à®á¬®âà¥ â¥«¥¢š§®à (â.¥. ã€ «šâ¥ íâ® ¯šáì¬® š§ á¢®¥£® ïéšª - ¢®â š ¢á¥, š ¥ €® §«šâáï š ¥à¢šç âì, ¯à®áâ® ã«ë¡šâ¥áì :-) - ®â íâ®£® ¡®«ìè¥ ¯®«ì§ë) ¯ áš¡® § è¥ ¯®š¬ š¥!!! è €à¥á ¢§ïâ š§ í«¥ªâà®®£® á¯à ¢®çšª "áï ®áášï ¢ â¥à¥â" (®¡®¢«¥š¥ 1 á¥âï¡àï 2001£.) ï šä®à¬ æšï ¢ëáë« ¥âáï ®€š à §, š ¡®«ìè¥ ¯®¢â®àïâáï, ¥ ¡ã€¥â! (å®âï ¢®§¬®Šë á¡®š ¢ à ¡®â¥ ¯à®£à ¬¬®£® ®¡¥á¯¥ç¥šï š ë ¬®Š¥â¥ ¯®«ãçšâì ¥áª®«ìª® ª®¯š© € ®£® ¯šáì¬ - ¬ èšë â®Š¥ ¬®£ãâ ®èš¡ âìáï :-)

1 0

Re: US v Miller (was Re: Naughty Journal Author Denied Plea Change
by keyser-soze＠hushmail.com 08 Sep '01

08 Sep '01

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > >What is your source for all this? This case is a point of interest >for me and such details as you have provided are not contained in the >text of the ruling, so where did they come from? See https://www.keepandbeararms.com/information/XcIBViewItem.asp?ID=2337 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: Hush 2.0 wmAEARECACAFAjuZWv8ZHGtleXNlci1zb3plQGh1c2htYWlsLmNvbQAKCRAg4ui5IoBV n18HAKCyudlJecWK7ZT/FGjoscp+qRbvlACfSeiv9CiwbNWW8ga8JQU1YWJ2ijY= =eR8i -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0