- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

A:\adult subjects2.txt OY
by bandcampbiacjes＠msn.com 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

http://www.teen-pie.com/index.html?hendrix Hey Baby Come bang me and my teen Bandcamp friends, Click on this link so I can feel you inside me http://www.teen-pie.com/index.html?hendrix WARNING: This site contains sexually explicit materials. You must be 18 or older to proceed. To be taken off this list res pond with "get me off"

1 0

DMCA UCITA, where's the beef? (off topic)
by cubic-dog 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

Aside from Dimitry, Has any "person" been successfully prosecuted under the DMCA? or under UCITA? or any other of these anti-piracy laws in the US? Operation Sundevil took place a relatively long time ago. We all hear dire warnings relative to software piracy and rumors of the Secret Service showing up and shutting a company down for bootleg M$ Office products and such things. But has anything like this actually happened? Yes, I hear folks go on and on about Steve Jackson Games, but I haven't seen anyone really concern themselves too much about the millions of bootlegs of M$ and Adon'tBee products in use in corporate america. Where lies the truth? anyone?

2 1

FBI MAS
by mattd 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

"There is a room full of frustrated males that don't get enough sex from their ugly wives and expensive mistresses " And I bet a few miss the old boss in drag...but seriously,the above sentence reminds me of my 2600 list here, where Im a well known 'white hat'hacker.I hear some of my friends are scarfing up the names of all known FBIers (like special agent lynne hunt in the register today) This is to protect them from the baddies like the lasker jihad.Keep those names coming.The C/list goes on forever.

1 0

RE: Fw: <nettime> New Scientist: Microwave Crowd Dispersal Tested (ADT)
by Trei, Peter 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

> cpaul[SMTP:inc@fastmedia.net] > > > > On Thursday, November 1, 2001, at 07:12 PM, cpaul wrote: > > > > > aluminum foil? > > > > http://www.newscientist.com/hottopics/tech/heatison.jsp > > > > > > Microwave beam weapon to disperse crowds > > > > i've been following the development of this skin heating > device for a while, and am keen to learn if there may be > an effective means to counter its use. > > the new scientist article suggests that the cornea is not > as resilient as skin when it comes to being bombarded with > microwaves, hence i seek opinions on how one might protect > oneself. > > if asking such is inane then i guess i should ask to have > my final request. > Leather or wet clothes may shield most of the body. A wild guess to protect the eyes would be something that puts a transparent conductive material over them - mirror sunglasses, the mylar glasses used for eclipse observations (though you could not see anything else through them :-(), or the conductive, mostly transparent plastic material which is used to package static sensitive electronic components. Another possibility is to make goggles out of metal flyscreen - since the wavelength is 3mm, it's doubtful that they can penetrate. Chain mail would also work for the body. Peter

1 0

New law contains ID-card proposal -- The Washington Times
by Jim Choate 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

http://www.washingtontimes.com/national/20011031-576161.htm -- -- ____________________________________________________________________ The people never give up their liberties but under some delusion. Edmund Burke (1784) The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Fw: <nettime> New Scientist: Microwave Crowd Dispersal Tested (ADT)
by cpaul 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

aluminum foil? * * * Begin forwarded message:

3 3

RIAA Wants Background Checks on CD-RW Buyers
by Jei 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

http://www.bbspot.com/news/2001/10/riaa.html Technology News Monday October 29 10:52 PM EST RIAA Wants Background Checks on CD-RW Buyers Washington DC - The RIAA is lobbying for vendors of CD-RW drives to conduct background checks and require a 3 day waiting period before the drive can be sold. The extensive background check would include cross referencing credit card numbers with local merchants sales logs looking for purchases of dual-cassette decks between the years of 1980 and 1987. It would also include checking for installation of file sharing software, knowledge of the Internet, and the ability to hum. Any of which would bar the purchaser from receiving his drive. Saaaatan? "A CD-RW can be a dangerous weapon when it falls into the wrong hands," said RIAA President Hilary Rosen, "You wouldn't sell a gun to a convicted felon and you shouldn't sell a CD-RW drive to a Gnutella user. The 3 day waiting period gives us time to verify that no copyrighted material is on the purchasers hard drive and to make sure they have a membership in the Columbia House CD club." Current owners of CD-RW drives would be required to obtain a license for use of the drive or face stiff fines. Licenses could be obtained by enrollment at a local RIAA Education Camp where the horrors of copyright violation would be instilled with the use of electro-shock therapy. "I was alarmed when I heard that children had the ability to burn CDs right on their computers," said Senator Strom Thurmond, "We've tried to educate parents on the dangers of children playing with fire, and now these death merchants sell them that ability in a shiny metal box." Other Senators voiced their concerns about the possible violations of privacy in the proposed legislation, but since it was called the Copyright Patriotism Act they are unable to oppose it. "The RIAA has gone too far this time. There are uses for CD-RW drives that don't violate RIAA copyrights like burning multiple copies of Microsoft Office for friends and neighbors," said Matthew Sodor an opponent of the legislation. Other News:

1 0

Re: Transperancy Spray?
by mmotyka＠lsil.com 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

>> Well, I was watching CNN and it looks like the Postal workers now are >> armed with a new weapon.. Against terror of course. THe whole cant read >> someone elses mail thing is out the window it looks like, they can spray >> this go on the letter and read through the envelope.. It seems >> implausable but its CNN, they dont lie right? well ANYWAYS, I now have a >> nice stash of black construction paper... > Yes, that would work nicely as the outside sheet. > "You spray it on and it temporarily makes the envelope clear," said > Robert Schlegel, vice-president of the makers, Mistral Security, of > Maryland. "It leaves an odor for 10 to 15 minutes, but there is no > smudging of ink, no stain, no evidence at all. The envelope is > transparent for a few minutes and you can respray it hundreds of > times without leaving any stain." > I would bet that there is SOMETHING that is dissolved by liquid freon. Just mark your letters with the stuff and look for the integrity of the mark at the other end. The USPS won't be checking mail this way anytime soon. If they were they would use some sort of freon recovery system to contain costs. Oh, well, it will soon be time to go buy $2.95 stamps to pay for UV, E-beam, freon and zoot suits. Mike

8 10

Re: what kind of bomb?
by mmotyka＠lsil.com 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

cpaul <inc(a)fastmedia.net> wrote : >Witnesses also said they saw a U.S. plane drop a bomb Tuesday >at the Bagram front lines, about 25 miles north of Kabul, >creating a mushroom cloud that billowed at least 1,000 feet >into the air. > > >http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/ap/20011030/ts/attacks_afghanistan_549.html > A really big one. Still conventional. Besides, a standard-sized one might have hit a munitions or fuel bunker. Hell, a 10 acre tire fire in central California made a "mushroom" shaped cloud several thousand feet high. During Vietnam there were boxcar-sized bombs used to clear an LZ in the jungle. How many tons? I don't know but they made ~100 yard circle.

2 2

Re: [The Star Article] Canadian lawyers asked to fink on clients (fwd)
by Tim May 01 Nov '01

01 Nov '01

On Wednesday, October 31, 2001, at 08:19 PM, !Dr. Joe Baptista wrote: > The next time you plunk down money for a lawyer, you might also be > hiring > the government's chief witness against you. > > enjoy > > On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 mailto(a)thestar.ca wrote: > >> Thought you might be interested in this one. >> http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Arti… >> c=Article&cid=1004482927745&call_page=TS_Canada&call_pageid=968332188774& >> call_pagepath=News/Canada&col=968350116467 >> >> Wed Oct 31 23:05:59 2001 > It is a profoundly moral act to kill any lawyer who acts as a witness for the other side. --Tim May "Extremism in the pursuit of liberty is no vice."--Barry Goldwater

1 0