- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: Slashdot | EU to Require Opt-In for Commercial Email (fwd)
by Dave Howe 31 May '02

31 May '02

> http://yro.slashdot.org/yro/02/05/30/1640210.shtml?tid=111 It was a combo bill - the Spammers have to restrict themselves to Opt-In, but the Governments get to demand ISPs keep records of who does what where on demand. Of course, none of this has legal force until ratified in the countries own legislation - anyone want to guess how many countries rush in the ISP record bits, and conveniently forget the spam bits?

1 0

How can i check the authenticity of a private key
by surinder pal singh makkar 31 May '02

31 May '02

Hi List, I am a newbie in cryptography. What I have learnt till now is that in assymeric cryptography scenario we have a private key and we generate the public key corresponding to it and then we send it to the central agency. Suppose after sometime I have a private key and the public key. Is there some software tool which can tell me whether the public key is the same corresponding to the private key I am having. Also is there some tool which can tell me whether the keys have been curropted or not __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com

5 4

Commercial quantum crypto product - news article (fwd)
by Jim Choate 31 May '02

31 May '02

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 08:57:46 -0600 From: "Kossmann, Bill" <BKossmann(a)dthr.ab.ca> To: cryptography(a)wasabisystems.com Subject: Commercial quantum crypto product - news article Anybody familiar with this product? <snip> This message is brought to you by IT World Canada Inc., publisher of ComputerWorld, Network World, CIO Canada, CxO and CIO Governments' Review. --------------------------------------------------------------- Daily ITwire from ITworldcanada.com Friday, May 31, 2002 <snip> A Swiss company has announced the commercial availability of what it says are the first IT products which exploit quantum effects rather than conventional physics to achieve their goals. (05/31/2002) http://itworld.ca/rpb.cfm?v=20021510001 <snip> --------------------------------------------------------------------- The Cryptography Mailing List Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo(a)wasabisystems.com

1 0

Re: How can i check the authenticity of a private key
by Major Variola (ret) 31 May '02

31 May '02

At 05:30 AM 5/31/02 -0700, surinder pal singh makkar wrote: >Hi List, > >I am a newbie in cryptography. What I have learnt till >now is that in assymeric cryptography scenario we have >a private key and we generate the public key >corresponding to it and then we send it to the central >agency. Correcting: You generate a key-pair, then you decide which half to keep secret. You publish the other half, where publish means gives to known associates. Or if you like encrypted spam, you publish to a well-known repository. You may repeat this and use different key-pairs with different groups of correspondents. >Suppose after sometime I have a private key and the >public key. Is there some software tool which can tell >me whether the public key is the same corresponding to >the private key I am having. Yes: encrypt a message using KeyA and decrypt with KeyB. If it decrypts, they are matching. Or you are extraordinarily unlucky :-) Generally the wrong key will decrypt to noise. Also is there some tool >which can tell me whether the keys have been curropted >or not Tools might include self-integrity info (CRCs, hashes, etc.) in their file formats; YMMV. If any bits in either half of the key data are changed, you lose.

1 0

Re: PKI: Only Mostly Dead
by Anonymous 31 May '02

31 May '02

[Trying to get this posted to the moderated cryptography list...] Peter Gutmann should be declared an international resource. With one foot in the commercial world, one in the government world and one in the cypherpunk world, he has a rare perspective on the big security issues. His irreverance, iconoclasm, frankness and humor make his essays a joy to read. Having said that, his recent analysis[1] falls prey to the conventional wisdom in certain respects. This gives him a curious blindness which contrasts with his usual clear vision. He scrupulously shines his light on all the dirty corners which the powers-that-be would like to keep hidden, all the while ignoring the elephant standing in the middle of the room. First is the fundamental claim that PKI is not working. Peter goes into detail about all the problems that are keeping PKI from success: CRLs, user interface problems, cost issues, etc. It's a sad litany of failure. Only one little thing mars this picture. PKI IS A TREMENDOUS SUCCESS WHICH IS USED EVERY DAY BY MILLIONS OF PEOPLE. Of course this is in reference to the use of public key certificates to secure ecommerce web sites. Every one of those https connections is secured by an X.509 certificate infrastructure. That's PKI. One might even go so far as to say that PKI saved the internet, by allowing people to engage in commerce without fear. People have been trained to look for the lock icon which tells them that they have a secure connection and can safely enter their credit card information. Certainly it is true that the internet today would be vastly different if we did not have a deployed, successful, and heavily utilized public key infrastructure. Any discussion of PKI's supposed failure ought to at least recognize that it has been an overwhelming success in this extremely important market segment. Another, less fundamental but equally annoying, blind spot is Peter's allegience to what is conventional wisdom in certain circles, namely that global names do not exist. It's one thing for Carl Ellison to make such a claim; after all, he's worn his SPKI blinders for so long that they have practically grafted themselves onto his head. But someone like Peter ought to be capable of a little more independent thought. Peter even goes so far as to refer to "a locally unique identifier such as an email address." Anyone who would refer to an email address as being only locally unique is blinding himself most carefully. The truth is that we are surrounded by globally unique identifiers and we use them every day. URLs, email addresses, DNS host names, Freenet selection keys, ICQ numbers, MojoIDs, all of these are globally unique! "pgut001(a)cs.auckland.ac.nz" is a globally unique name; you can use that address from anywhere in the world and it will get to the same mailbox. The existence of globally unique identifiers may not fit into some people's ideology but it is a matter of fact all the same. And likewise with the fact that there are extremely important areas where PKI has been massively successful. Let's hope that Peter's legendary clear vision will allow him to pierce the orthodoxy that comes from his friends as easily as that which comes from outsiders. === [1] http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/pubs/notdead.zip

1 0

Insight on the News Email Edition
by Insight on the News 31 May '02

31 May '02

INSIGHT NEWS ALERT! New Stories From Insight on the News Are Now Online. http://www.insightmag.com ............................................... Folks, Its been a busy week for Mike Waller. First he ruffled quite a few Washington feathers with his expose of how Clinton-era bureaucrats are still undermining our defense policy. http://www.insightmag.com/news/253607.html. Then he uncovered the shocking story that Castro is turning over his old Soviet bases to the Chinese http://www.insightmag.com/news/254144.html. Until Monday, then, I remain your newsman in Washington. ............................................... CHINA. . .SI! Michael Waller writes how Russian reports on Cuba detail a new Chinese invasion. http://www.insightmag.com/news/254144.html ............................................... ITALY TAPPED IN ON PRE-SEPT. 11 CHAT Italian authorities listened in on al Qaeda members in Europe for more than a year, as they repeatedly discussed a major plot aimed at the United States. http://www.insightmag.com/news/253962.html ............................................... CONSERVATIVES QUESTION DUBYAS DIRECTION Jamie Dettmer asks if George W. Bush becoming the president who just can't say no? http://www.insightmag.com/news/253616.html ======================================== Pre-Publication Special SAVE 30%! Prominent liberals -- desperate to gain even more political power in America -- pull no punches in their effort to defame and discredit conservatives. And their pals in the media are forever letting them get away with it. But finally someone is calling their bluff. In Slander, Ann Coulter exposes those carrying out this campaign and refutes their vicious slanders and outright lies. Order now and save 30%, click here: http://www.conservativebookservice.com/BookPage.asp?prod_cd=C5985&sour_cd=I… ======================================== SPREADING THE BLAME FOR THE SEPT. 11 SECURITY FIASCO Brian Sullivan opines that perhaps if Norman Mineta or his subordinates had taken the time this past summer to conduct a simple but realistic risk assessment, the odds would have been improved for avoiding the tragedy of 9/11. http://www.insightmag.com/news/253643.html ............................................... PAKISTAN TESTS THIRD MISSILE How will India respond? http://www.insightmag.com/news/253786.html ............................................... HOW POLITICAL CORRECTNESS HAS DESTROYED REAL JOURNALISM Steve Goode interviews author and media critic William McGowan, who details how 'identity' politics has overtaken American newsrooms, turning journalists into cheerleaders instead of skeptics. http://www.insightmag.com/news/253623.html ======================================== SUBSCRIBE TO THE INSIGHT PRINT EDITION TODAY! And Save 72% (Off Our Newsstand Price) https://www.collegepublisher.com/insightsub/subform1.cfm ======================================= You have received this newsletter because you have a user name and password at Insight on the News. To unsubscribe from this newsletter, visit "http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm?include=unsubscribe". You may also log into Insight on the News and edit your account preferences on the Web. If you have forgotten or don't know your user name and password, it will be emailed to you after visiting the following link: http://www.insightmag.com/main.cfm?include=emailPassword&serialNumber=16oai…

1 0

reply soon
by MR.IFEANYI DANIELS 31 May '02

31 May '02

ATTN: THE BENEFICIARY Dear Sir, Your contact was discretely sourced for among others with respect to your position as an international acclaimed personality; and we decided in your favour as a partner for this business proposal bearing in mind that you are of an outstanding reputation to usher you in as the beneficiary. However, I repose every confidence in you concerning your status by virtue of its nature as being utterly confidential and with the believe that you could be fully trusted to handle this business with the degree of confidence it deserves. I am MR. IFEANYI DANIELS an Audit Manager with the FEDERAL MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM & NATURAL RESOURCES under the Contract Tender Committee. My colleagues and I in the corporation need the services/assistance of a competent, trustworthy and reputable foreigner or company into whose account the sum of US $6,000,000M (Six Million United States Dollars) would be remitted before the Deregulation of the Oil sector. This fund originated from a deliberate over-estimation of contracts that was awarded by the Ministry to foreign companies for drilling, excavation and spot lifting of black gold (Crude oil) in Portnovo located in the tiny Republic of Benin. Since, they are not members of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Country, they requested for our Ministry's (Federal Ministry of Petroleum & Natural Resources) assistance. This fund has been lying unclaimed at the Accounts Department of the Ministry because it has neither a beneficiary nor any file with the corporation. It is within this framework, that we have resolved to usher you in as the beneficiary of this fund by Legally subcontracting the entitlement to you or your company based on agreement with you. Moreover, the need to contact you or your company is deemed fit because the contracts were executed by foreign firms and the money cannot go into indigenous accounts because the Code of Conduct (COC) of the Federal Civil Servants here (Nigeria) restrict us to a certain level of Banking facilities which does not allow us to operate a Domiciliary account; however, it is imperative to usher you in as a foreign partner so as to avoid suspicion from unconcerned quarters and most importantly, for fear of loosing our jobs. Meanwhile, the original contractors of these projects had since collected their supposed payments accordingly after the commissioning of their works. Now, we want to remit this over-estimated amount to a reliable overseas account for our personal use and for investments opportunities. All the certificates and proper documentation to effect the transfer shall be provided to you for your perusal upon your pledge to do this business with us. Subsequently, your support will enable us make applications and lodge claims to the Ministry's Agencies enabling you to fit in as the beneficiary for the claims. Please, be informed that this business is closely knitted and 100% hitch free and so entails absolute confidentiality and in case you are not interested to assist, keep it to yourself. Your quick response upon your Expression Of Interest (EOI) will enable me stop further search for a beneficiary. Reply through email for further briefing on how to commence this transaction.I look forward to hearing from you and your cooperation would be highly acknowledged. Best regards, MR.IFEANYI DANIELS

1 0

RE: FC: Hollywood wants to plug "analog hole," regulate A-D conve rters
by Trei, Peter 31 May '02

31 May '02

> ---------- > From: Nomen Nescio[SMTP:nobody@dizum.com] > Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 12:20 AM > To: cryptography(a)wasabisystems.com; cypherpunks(a)lne.com > Subject: Re: FC: Hollywood wants to plug "analog hole," regulate A-D > converters > > Peter Trei writes: > > My mind has been boggled, my flabbers have been ghasted. > > > > In the name of protecting their business model, the MPAA > > proposes that every analog/digital (A/D) converter - one of > > the most basic of chips - be required to check for US > > government mandated copyright flags. Quite aside from > > increasing the cost and complexity of the devices many, > > manyfold, it eliminates the ability of the US to compete > > in the world electronics market. > > This is absurd. In all the commentary on this issue, no one has made > the obvious point that the MPAA has no interest or intention in putting > watermark detectors into every ADC chip! They don't care about the ADC > chip in a digital thermometer or even a cell phone. All they care about > are things like PC video capture cards, which are high fidelty consumer > devices capable of digitizing copyright protected content. > > Their white paper is a brief summary of their goals and intentions and > does not go into full technical detail. But let's use a little common > sense here, folks. > This is the actual paragraph that people are refering to: [from http://judiciary.senate.gov/special/content_protection.pdf] - start quote - The primary means to address this issue, dubbed the "analog hole", is via embedded watermarks (which have additional applications as will be discussed below). In order to help plug the hole, watermark detectors would be required in all devices that perform analog to digital conversions. In such devices (e.g., PC video capture cards), the role of the watermark detector would be to detect the watermark and ensure that the device responds appropriately. - end quote - Note that is refers to "all devices that perform analog to digital conversions". I agree that compromising all a/d chip is probably not what the MPAA had in mind (their example is a video capture card, a much more complex beast), but overbroad language has gotten into too many laws for me to have any faith that it can't happen again. What's going to happen when someone publishes plans to remove the restrictions from a compromised vidcap card, and explains how to mail order standard DACs? Will trafficing in DAC chips become a DMCA violation? > It's pointless to try to shoot down this proposal by raising all these > horror stories about ADC chips in industrial and technical devices > being crippled by a watermark detector which will never be activated. > If you waste time developing this line of argument, you will be left > with nothing to say when the actual bill focuses only on the specific > devices that the content holders are worried about. > [...] > Please, let's use some common sense and not go overboard with an obviously > mistaken interpretation of the MPAA's intentions. That wastes everyone's > time. > I agree that the MPAA's reccomendation is laughable, but stupidity has never stopped politicians from passing laws. Peter Trei

1 0

(no subject)
by JOSEPH EDWARD 31 May '02

31 May '02

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL & URGENT. I am Mr, Joseph Edward a native of Cape Town in South Africa and I am an Executive Accountant with the South Africa MINISTRY OF MINERAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY First and foremost, I apologized using this medium to reach you for a transaction/business of this magnitude, but this is due to Confidentiality and prompt access reposed on this medium. I have decided to seek a confidential co-operation with you in the execution of the deal described Hereunder for the benefit of all parties and hope you will keep it as a top secret because of the nature of this transaction. Within the Department of Mining & Natural Resources where I work as an Executive Accountant and with the cooperation of four other top officials, we have in our possession as overdue payment bills totaling Twenty - One Million, Five Hundred Thousand U. S. Dollars ($21,500,000.) which we want to transfer abroad with the assistance and cooperation of a foreign company/individual to receive the said fund on our behalf or a reliable foreign non-company account to receive such funds. More so, we are handicapped in the circumstances, as the South Africa Civil Service Code of Conduct does not allow us to operate offshore account hence your importance in the whole transaction. This amount $21.5m represents the balance of the total contract value executed on behalf of my Department by a foreign contracting firm, which we the officials over-invoiced deliberately. Though the actual contract cost have been paid to the original contractor, leaving the balance in the Tune of the said amount which we have in principles gotten approval to remit by Key tested Telegraphic Transfer (K.T.T) to any foreign bank account you will provide by filing in an application through the Justice Ministry here in South Africa for the transfer of rights and privileges of the former contractor to you. I have the authority of my partners involved to propose that should you be willing to assist us in the transaction, your share of the sum will be 25% of the $21.5 million, 70% for us and 5% for taxation and miscellaneous expenses. The business itself is 100% safe, on your part provided you treat it with utmost secrecy and confidentiality. Also your area of specialization is not a hindrance to the successful execution of this transaction. I have reposed my confidence in you and hope that you will not disappoint me. Endeavor to contact me immediately my e-mail address whether or not you are interested in this deal. If you are not, it will enable me scout for another foreign partner to carry out this deal I want to assure you that my partners and myself are in a position to make the payment of this claim possible provided you can give us a very strong Assurance and guarantee that our share will be secured and please remember to treat this matter as very confidential matter, because we will not comprehend with any form of exposure as we are still in active Government Service and remember once again that time is of the essence in this business. I wait in anticipation of your fullest co-operation. Yours faithfully, JOSEPH EDWARD

1 0

None
by JOSEPH EDWARD 31 May '02

31 May '02

STRICTLY CONFIDENTIAL & URGENT. I am Mr, Joseph Edward a native of Cape Town in South Africa and I am an Executive Accountant with the South Africa MINISTRY OF MINERAL RESOURCES AND ENERGY First and foremost, I apologized using this medium to reach you for a transaction/business of this magnitude, but this is due to Confidentiality and prompt access reposed on this medium. I have decided to seek a confidential co-operation with you in the execution of the deal described Hereunder for the benefit of all parties and hope you will keep it as a top secret because of the nature of this transaction. Within the Department of Mining & Natural Resources where I work as an Executive Accountant and with the cooperation of four other top officials, we have in our possession as overdue payment bills totaling Twenty - One Million, Five Hundred Thousand U. S. Dollars ($21,500,000.) which we want to transfer abroad with the assistance and cooperation of a foreign company/individual to receive the said fund on our behalf or a reliable foreign non-company account to receive such funds. More so, we are handicapped in the circumstances, as the South Africa Civil Service Code of Conduct does not allow us to operate offshore account hence your importance in the whole transaction. This amount $21.5m represents the balance of the total contract value executed on behalf of my Department by a foreign contracting firm, which we the officials over-invoiced deliberately. Though the actual contract cost have been paid to the original contractor, leaving the balance in the Tune of the said amount which we have in principles gotten approval to remit by Key tested Telegraphic Transfer (K.T.T) to any foreign bank account you will provide by filing in an application through the Justice Ministry here in South Africa for the transfer of rights and privileges of the former contractor to you. I have the authority of my partners involved to propose that should you be willing to assist us in the transaction, your share of the sum will be 25% of the $21.5 million, 70% for us and 5% for taxation and miscellaneous expenses. The business itself is 100% safe, on your part provided you treat it with utmost secrecy and confidentiality. Also your area of specialization is not a hindrance to the successful execution of this transaction. I have reposed my confidence in you and hope that you will not disappoint me. Endeavor to contact me immediately my e-mail address whether or not you are interested in this deal. If you are not, it will enable me scout for another foreign partner to carry out this deal I want to assure you that my partners and myself are in a position to make the payment of this claim possible provided you can give us a very strong Assurance and guarantee that our share will be secured and please remember to treat this matter as very confidential matter, because we will not comprehend with any form of exposure as we are still in active Government Service and remember once again that time is of the essence in this business. I wait in anticipation of your fullest co-operation. Yours faithfully, JOSEPH EDWARD

1 0