- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

VIRUS ALERT! - Language
by virus_alert＠nucleus.com 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

THE FOLLOWING IS AN AUTOMATED SECURITY ALERT FROM NUCLEUS INC. A message or attachment that was sent to you was tested prior to delivery and found to contain a virus. As a result, it was NOT delivered to you. A message sent to you by e.taylor(a)nucleus.com The suspicious attachment has been removed from the original message. Scan report: File 'GWWEB[9].pif' has a forbidden name Specific details regarding a virus can be found at the following links: http://www.f-secure.com/v-descs/ http://www.symantec.com/avcenter/vinfodb.html http://www.avp.ch/avpve/ http://csrc.ncsl.nist.gov/virus/ NOTE: This message is being sent from an automated, unattended account. Please read the information links supplied in this email to find out more about the particular virus you have received. If you have further questions, please email support(a)nucleus.com. Nucleus, Inc. http://www.nucleus.com/

1 0

Direct Contact 6536 Shoes Factories in China
by moxiuling＠hotmail.com 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

As soon as you have 6536 website addresses of shoes factories in China you will have a tremendous space of supply of goods, and how illustrious will your business be? I specialize in trade resource services. Now, I collected 6536 usable website addresses of shoes factories in Chinaup up to now, you will can visit these websites and view their products catalogues and direct contact the manufacturers by email, tel or fax as soon as you have this data. Only pay $70 USD for all. Don't Hesitate contact us if you need this data. Yours sincerely Ms. Mo Xiulin China ============================================================= žÃÓÊŒþÊ¹ÓÃ ¿ÆÌØÓÊŒþÈº·¢ÈíŒþ ·¢ËÍ,ÓÊŒþÄÚÈÝÓë¿ÆÌØÈíŒþÎÞ¹Ø ¿ÆÌØÈíŒþ http://www.caretop.com =============================================================

1 0

企业增效之路必备的宣传手段
by serve＠advertise2.com 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

1 0

re: State's medical marijuana proposition doesn't trump federal regulations (was Re: !!! Nov-L: Calif. City Plans Marijuana Giveaway (fwd))
by Steve Schear 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

>Though the council passed a resolution denouncing the raid, there is no >official city sponsorship of the event - council members and medical >marijuana advocates are simply acting on their own in a public space, >said >City Attorney John Barisone. > >DEA spokesman Richard Meyer was surprised at the plan. > >``Are you serious? That's illegal. It's like they're flouting federal >law,'' >he said. ``I'm shocked that city leaders would promote the use of >marijuana >that way. What is that saying to our youth?'' [The following is my response to a related article (unfortunately not on-line) from the Opinion section of the San Jose Mercury News by Larry N. Gerston, a professor of political science at SJSU and political analyst at NBC3, wherein the question is asked whether we should have obey laws we don't like. Larry, Your September 11 SJMN op-ed piece, "State's medical marijuana proposition doesn't trump federal regulations," made some good points regarding the current balance of power between the states and federal government and the importance of obeying laws. And in a perfect world I'd agree, but this is not that world. Sometimes civil disobedience or even criminal action is needed to pressure legislators or the courts to doing what's right. Governmental systems have an inherent mandate to increase power and rarely give it up. When those in authority encounter impediments they will often seek a means, occasionally illegal, to achieve their ends. Our system of checks and balances (including the states) was created to thwart the most dangerous form of anarchy, anarchy from within. Whenever this system fails all our liberties are at stake. Such is the case with the apparently illegal enactment of the 14th Amendment upon which is based much of current federal authority. At the close of the Civil War the Republican controlled Congress sought to legally "lock in" the expansion of federal authority it had gained as a result of battlefield victories with Joint Resolution No. 127 proposing a 14th Amendment. But once again the Southern States stood in their way. Although President Jackson (who succeeded Lincoln) and Congress had acknowledged the legitimacy of the these duly elected governments, in their frustration the 39th Congress voted, on December 5, 1865, to deny seats in both Houses to anyone elected from the 11 southern States. They also ejected New Jersey Senator Stockton who opposed the bill and would have cast the deciding ballot, and refused to count the denied southern representative's numbers when computing the two-thirds majority Constitutionally required for passage. Whether it requires two thirds of the full membership of both Houses to propose an Amendment to the Constitution or only two thirds of those seated or two thirds of those voting is a question which it would seem could only be determined by the Supreme Court. Congress cared little about these "minor irregularities" in the proposal and voting process, they proceeded to submit the amendment to the States for ratification. But, surprise, things did not go well. After some legislatures first ratified and then recanted, in the end 16 of the 37 states rejected the measure. When the State of Louisiana rejected the 14th Amendment on February 6, 1867 [making the 10th State to have rejected the same or more than one-fourth of the total number of 36 States of the Union (as of that date) leaving less than three-fourths of the States to possibly ratify the same] the Amendment failed. It could not have been revived except by a new Joint Resolution of the Senate and House of Representatives in accordance with Constitutional requirement. Congress decided that states legislatures were not free to change their minds on ratification and ignored all those who did so. On the 20th of July 1868 Secretary of State Seward issued his proclamation of ratification of the fourteenth amendment, in which, after reciting the law of 1818 requiring him to publish the ratification of an amendment to the Constitution in the newspapers. However his language in the proclamation shows very clearly that Mr Seward had his doubts about the Constitutionality of the ratification process, and he takes pains to relieve himself of any responsibility by declaring that - "Neither the act just quoted from, nor any other law, expressly or by conclusive implication, authorizes the Secretary of State to determine and decide doubtful questions as to the authenticity of the organization of State legislatures or as to the power of any State legislature to recall a previous act or resolution of ratification of any amendment proposed to the Constitution". The Senate brushed aside Secretary Steward's concerns and on the next day Senator Sherman offered a Joint Resolution declaring that three fourths and more of the States had ratified the proposed Amendment, and therefore that it was a part of the Constitution. Secretary Steward was pressured into certifying the Amendment as passed. In a Message to the Senate (Senate Ex. Doc. No. 57 of the 39th Congress, 1st Session); President Andrew Johnson commented on the "Concurrent Resolution" of July 21, 1868 "In this matter nothing has happened to change the mind or solve the doubts of the Secretary, but as an executive officer, he was compelled to obey a joint resolution of Congress whatever his own opinion might be of the power of Congress to pass it, that being, as I have said above, a judicial question." Finally, there are no records showing that the Resolution was ever submitted to the President of the United States for his approbation. According to Article V of the Constitution for the United States; the Resolution is governed by the procedures of U.S. Const., I:7:3 - "Every order, RESOLUTION, or vote to which the concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary, (except on a question of adjournment) SHALL BE PRESENTED TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES; AND BEFORE THE SAME SHALL TAKE EFFECT, SHALL BE APPROVED BY HIM, or being disapproved by him, shall be re-passed by two-thirds of the Senate and House of Representatives, according to the rules and limitations prescribed in the case of a bill." We can conclude from the above Message that the President would have "Vetoed" the Resolution. If the Resolution was "Vetoed" [and as there are no Records showing that either House of Congress voted to repass the Resolution over the Veto], we can conclude that the Concurrent Resolution of July 21, 1868 failed. To all the issues the courts have been mute, however, declaring in Unpublished Opinions that all questions involving the 14th Amendment are "Political Questions" to the Courts. Its this sort of dereliction of duty by the courts that does mortally would our Constitution. So, in response to you question whether one is free to ignore certain laws, I bow to a basic doctrine adopted by our courts: 16th American Jurisprudence 2d, Section 177, late 2d, Section 256: "No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it." steve

1 0

labia minor rucuw
by Nicole 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

1 0

>>>Last Chance...14.5 MILLION EMAIL ADDRESSES...PLUS OVER $2,000 WORTH OF FREE SOFTWARE!
by Joanne Panchadsaram 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

WOULD YOU LIKE TO HAVE YOUR MESSAGE SEEN BY OVER 14.5 MILLION TARGETED PROSPECTS DAILY? If you have not already taken advantage of this special offer... Now is your last chance...Read below for details! Below is all the information you will ever need to market your product or service over the Internet! If you have a product, service, or message that you would like to get out to Thousands, Hundreds of Thousands, or even Millions of people, you have several options. Traditional methods include print advertising, direct mail, radio, and television advertising. They are all effective, but they all have two catches: They're EXPENSIVE and TIME CONSUMING. Not only that, you only get ONE SHOT at making your message heard by the right people. Now this has all changed! Internet Search Engines Submissions, Classified Ads, Newsgroup Postings simply DO NOT WORK. Thanks to the top programmers in the world and their NEW EMAIL TECHNOLOGY, You can send millions of email messages daily for FREE... Without getting terminated from your current Internet connection! It's very simple to do and you can be increasing your sales within minutes of installing this new extraordinary software! Besides...It's the only real way to advertise on the Internet that works...Period! >>>WE WILL SUPPLY YOU WITH OVER 14.5 MILLION OPT-IN EMAIL ADDRESSES TO GET STARTED RIGHT AWAY! >>>PLUS FREE EMAIL ADDRESS DOWNLOADS FOR ONE FULL YEAR! >>>ALSO YOU WILL RECEIVE $2,000 WORTH OF INTERNET MARKETING SOFTWARE FREE! Including...... EMAIL SENDING SOFTWARE...(send millions of email advertisements daily with a few clicks of your mouse) EMAIL EXTRACTION SOFTWARE...(retreive new targeted email addresses daily hundreds of thousands of them) LIST MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE...(keep your lists clean, opt-in and manage all your remove requests, leads, sales etc...) and much...much more! To find out more information, Do not respond by email. Instead, visit our web site at: http://www.cashforever.net _____________________________________________________ Want to be removed from our list? Simply send an email to us at cybernetremova(a)excite.com and type "remove" in the "subject" line and you will be removed from any future mailings.

1 0

Bulk APster rates
by Matthew X 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

Conspiracy grows Murder for insurance ring broken up As many as 24 alleged conspirators could face charges in connection with a massive scheme to murder Guyanese immigrants for insurance money, law-enforcement sources told The New York Post Wednesday. "The conspiracy is extensive. Others, not yet identified . . . participated," Assistant U.S. Attorney John Curran argued in court papers made public yesterday at a bail hearing for one alleged culprit, Ronald Mallay. Mallay, an unemployed Queens man, is accused of recruiting hit men and collecting insurance money as part of the murder-for-hire scheme that sources say targeted at least seven victims - and probably more. Also accused of murder conspiracy is Richard James, a Queens insurance agent who allegedly wrote policies for numerous "customers" who died under suspicious circumstances. Mallay, 57, was denied bail in Brooklyn federal court, where prosecutors revealed the results of a search of his wife Lazina's Queens apartment. Investigators said they found five insurance policies, including $1.5 million in coverage for a man whose occupation is listed as a flea-market clothing salesman - and whom prosecutors have not been able to locate. http://organizedcrime.about.com/library/weekly/aa081502a.htm

1 0

NEVER DONE BEFORE... BUT WE ARE DOING IT!! 4651CeOW9-654fAJX2364VJBm2--25
by Frank0240r64＠msn.com 13 Sep '02

13 Sep '02

1 0

NFL Week#2 - Pick a Winner at Sportsinteraction!
by Sweepsgame.com 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

Your privacy is extremely important to us. You requested to receive this mailing, by registering at Sweepsgame.com or by subscribing through one of our marketing partners. As a leader in permission-based email marketing, Sweepsgame.com is committed to delivering a highly rewarding experience. However, if you wish to unsubscribe, please forward a copy of this message to Sweepsgame(a)reply.mb00.net with the word remove in the subject line. Third-party offers contained in this email are the sole responsibility of the offer originator. S P O R T S I N T E R A C T I O N Week 2 Super Parlay Special! 10% Initial Deposit Bonus! http://www.ppmtrac.com/tk/116/ <a href="http://www.ppmtrac.com/tk/116/"> AOL Users Click Here</a> Now that pro football is hot again, what better time to try your gridiron gumption than with a parlay bet at Sports Interaction! The full slate of games is waiting for you so take a crack at a 6-team parlay and you could win HUGE on pro football in Week 2. This is the excitement you've been waiting for - it's time to get in on the action! At Sports Interaction you can bet online instantly with your credit card, using the currency of your choice! Try it Now! http://www.ppmtrac.com/tk/116/ <a href="http://www.ppmtrac.com/tk/116/"> AOL Users Click Here</a> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> * To remove yourself from this mailing list, point your browser to: http://i.mb00.net/remove?Sweepsgame:* * Enter your email address (cypherpunks(a)minder.net) in the field provided and click "Unsubscribe". The mailing list ID is "Sweepsgame:*". OR... * Forward a copy of this message to Sweepsgame(a)reply.mb00.net with the word remove in the subject line. <mailto:Sweepsgame@reply.mb00.net?subject=remove> This message was sent to address cypherpunks(a)minder.net X-PMG-Recipient: cypherpunks(a)minder.net <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> <<<>>> pmguid:1rp.331s.18wkw

1 0

RE: Your commissions are waiting.
by aymLucky 12 Sep '02

12 Sep '02

Your commissions are waiting to be earned by simply using your FREE Professional Autoresponder system valued at over $300. This is a wonderful gift for you, friends, business associates, co-workers, shop owners literally anyone that uses e-mail! The best part about it is you could even make money by giving away these systems! I'm not kidding, FREE Autoresponder system + income earning = Perfect gift. Please don't be offended by this one time mailing. No need to remove! Claim your free systems now by simply replying. Regards, MRP

1 0