- cypherpunks-legacy - lists.cpunks.org

Re: Gestapo harasses John Young, appeals to patriotism, told to fuck off
by Freematt357＠aol.com 15 Nov '03

15 Nov '03

In a message dated 11/10/2003 3:02:47 PM Eastern Standard Time, jya(a)pipeline.com writes: > They showed up without warning, no call ahead, got > past our Doberman doorman (we're on the 6th floor) > who usually calls us about visitors but didn't this time, > and hasn't said a peep since the visit. > Why open the door to them? I have a few friends who as a matter of principle do not open their doors to people they do not know. Letting a Fedgoon in is akin to inviting a vampire into your house. Regards, Matt-

2 1

Re: Jews Go Nuclear
by Major Variola (ret) 15 Nov '03

15 Nov '03

At 01:44 PM 11/14/03 -0800, Eric Cordian wrote: >http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,10613 >Israel deploys nuclear arms in submarines You put nukes in subs to avoid getting them blown up esp. by a first strike. So whoever nukes Israel had best do so without a piece of real estate associated with it, because the sub nukes will persist. Even if the ground-based intel the subs might have relied on for targeting is smoking slag. The problem of real estate: Look what happened to the Afghans who gave ClintonBush a place to target. Yet another advantage to being a unlocalized organization. Or working out of an untouchable like Saudi arabia.

2 1

Jews Go Nuclear
by Eric Cordian 15 Nov '03

15 Nov '03

So much for non-proliferation of "weapons of mass destruction", right? http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,10613 ----- Israel deploys nuclear arms in submarines Peter Beaumont in London and Conal Urquhart in Jerusalem Sunday October 12, 2003 The Observer Israeli and American officials have admitted collaborating to deploy US-supplied Harpoon cruise missiles armed with nuclear warheads in Israel's fleet of Dolphin-class submarines, giving the Middle East's only nuclear power the ability to strike at any of its Arab neighbours. ... -- Eric Michael Cordian 0+ O:.T:.O:. Mathematical Munitions Division "Do What Thou Wilt Shall Be The Whole Of The Law"

2 2

Re: [Mac_crypto] MacOS X (Panther) FileVault
by R. A. Hettinga 14 Nov '03

14 Nov '03

--- begin forwarded text

1 0

NTK now, 2003-11-14 (fwd from tips@spesh.com)
by Eugen Leitl 14 Nov '03

14 Nov '03

----- Forwarded message from Dave Green <tips(a)spesh.com> -----

1 0

[s-t] the thompson gambit digest #1
by Eugen Leitl 14 Nov '03

14 Nov '03

----- Forwarded message from kaze no tani no potsicaa <> -----

1 0

[s-t] the thompson gambit digest #1
by None 14 Nov '03

14 Nov '03

Re: needle in haystack digest #3 from Robert Walsh <rjwalsh(a)durables.org> and Nick Barnes <Nick.Barnes(a)pobox.com> Re: How a backdoor in the Linux kernel was thwarted (fwd) from V Layne <goliard(a)mixolydian.org> Re: How a backdoor in the Linux kernel was thwarted (fwd) from Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron(a)waste.org> Re: How a backdoor in the Linux kernel was thwarted (fwd) from Jamie McCarthy <jamie(a)mccarthy.vg> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 0

[s-t] the thompson gambit digest #1
by None 14 Nov '03

14 Nov '03

Re: needle in haystack digest #3 from Robert Walsh <rjwalsh(a)durables.org> and Nick Barnes <Nick.Barnes(a)pobox.com> Re: How a backdoor in the Linux kernel was thwarted (fwd) from V Layne <goliard(a)mixolydian.org> Re: How a backdoor in the Linux kernel was thwarted (fwd) from Oliver Xymoron <oxymoron(a)waste.org> Re: How a backdoor in the Linux kernel was thwarted (fwd) from Jamie McCarthy <jamie(a)mccarthy.vg> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

1 0

Deniable data storage
by James A. Donald 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

I want to store information deniably. So there would be a fixed sized block of data, say one megabyte, increasing by multiples of 8 as needed. This would contain various items of information that one could extract by supplyin a secret, symmetric, key. A random key would extract a block of gibberish of random length There would be no indication as to how many bits of meaningful data were stored in the block, though obviously they would have to add up to less than the size of the block. So one could store one's password list under one key, and the location of the dead bodies under another key, and absent that key, there would be no evidence that they key, or information hidden under that key, existed. What is a good algorithm for this?

3 2

Re: [s-t] How a backdoor in the Linux kernel was thwarted (fwd)
by Jamie McCarthy 13 Nov '03

13 Nov '03

amerritt(a)spasticmutant.com (Spastic Mutant) writes: > Someone broke into a server at kernel.kbits.net and inserted > the following code into the Linux kernel: The code was inserted into a CVS mirror of the kernel. The kernel itself is stored and updated in BitKeeper, primarily on a machine of Linus's, and then copied to a public BitKeeper archive, and from there to the CVS mirror. Neither BitKeeper machine was not broken into and their code was not changed. So it's arguable whether the change, which was caught within 24 hours, constituted changing the Linux kernel. I would argue no. http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/11/06/058249 and I'm told that this coverage is good, but you and I aren't able to read it for a week :) http://lwn.net/Articles/57135/ -- Jamie McCarthy http://mccarthy.vg/ jamie(a)mccarthy.vg ----------------------------------------------------------- ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Eugen* Leitl <a href="http://leitl.org">leitl</a> ______________________________________________________________ ICBM: 48.07078, 11.61144 http://www.leitl.org 8B29F6BE: 099D 78BA 2FD3 B014 B08A 7779 75B0 2443 8B29 F6BE [demime 0.97c removed an attachment of type application/pgp-signature]

1 0