February 2011 - cypherpunks-legacy

Just $1.27 a tablet! Cheap Viagra OVERNIGHT from USA stock. Free Delivery! 10% OFF for ALL reorders! FDA approved. Excellent quality of all pills without exception! We accept VISA & eCheck.
by Doreen Priscila 14 Feb '11

14 Feb '11

Next Day Delivery Viagra. LOW PRICE Viagra. Pills from USA stock Best Deal Viagra. Free Delivery. A lot of packs & dosage available. Quality Viagra from $1.37 per pill. Guaranted Satisfaction & Discount 10% for all reorders! Order FDA approved Viagra. MasterCard, VISA, eChecks http://appletabletpharmacypills.ru

1 0

Buy V|AGRA ONLINE - Discounts and Free Shipping applied. 24/7 Online support, Absolute anonymity & Fast delivery
by Yetta Stephanie 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

Buy VIAGRA Now From $1.25 & Get 12 bonus pills FREE! Generic & Brand Viagra for $1.25/pill from TRUSTED online resellers. Buy Viagra Online with Satisfaction Guarantee. Buy Cheap Generic Viagra or Brand name Viagra http://buyhealthmeds.ru

1 0

Изменения: Заработная плата, временная нетрудоспособность
by Больничные листы 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

С 1 января 2011 года введен новый порядок расчета пособий по временной нетрудоспособности. Наряду с увеличением количества дней, оплачиваемых за счет работодателя, изменился расчетный период, включаемые в него суммы и исключаемые периоды. Нововведением явился учет заработной платы, полученной у прежних работодателей. По-иному оплачиваются периоды работы в режиме неполного рабочего времени и время простоя и т.д. 04 марта ЗАРАБОТНАЯ ПЛАТА В 2011г.: ПРАВОВЫЕ, БУХГАЛТЕРСКИЕ И НАЛОГОВЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ Егоров Вадим Викторович - эксперт АКДИ "Экономика и жизнь", практик-бухгалтер с многолетним опытом работы, автор книги "Больничные и другие социальные пособия" и публикаций в изданиях "Экономика и жизнь", "Российский налоговый курьер", "Новая бухгалтерия" и др. +7 (Ч95) 7922I-22 **** 4Ч5*З9-68 Цель: новое в практике исчисления пособий по временной нетрудоспособности, по беременности и родам в 2011 году, рассмотреть новый порядок начисления страховых взносов от несчастных случаев на производстве, получить последние разъяснения о порядке начисления страховых взносов Программа: 1. Новое в практике исчисления пособий по временной нетрудоспособности, по беременности и родам в 2011 году 2. Порядок исчисления пособий по уходу за ребенком. Повышение размеров пособия в 2011 году 3. Новый порядок начисления страховых взносов от несчастных случаев на производстве 4. Изменение размеров и условий оплаты труда в условиях экономического кризиса. Требования ТК РФ и НК РФ. Особенности оплаты труда при неполном рабочем времени 5. Последние разъяснения о порядке начисления страховых взносов 6. Налог на доходы физических лиц. Изменения, вступающие в силу в 2011 году Вся информация по тел: +7 (код Москвы) 792*-2I/.22 **** 445Ч05З

1 0

Potential Gains Up To 3+ Full Inches In Length & Girth
by Charlena Babara 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

100% Safe To Take, With No Side Effects Make Penis Bigger Bigger Penis Pill is a product that can help your erections be the way they used to be. This product is completely natural. The best way to achieve your maximum potential with erections is in your blood flow. If your blood flow has been reduced you will experience problems with your erection. Rated NO.1 Penis Enhancement Pill on the Market! * Potential Gains Up To 3+ Full Inches In Length & Girth * Achieve Powerful Erections * Reduces Premature Ejaculation * Produce Stronger and Rock Hard Erections * Longer more intense orgasms * Increase in sperm volume * Increased stamina and staying power * 100% Safe To Take, With No Side Effects * 100% FDA Approved Conditions http://longpenisitive.ru

1 0

Глобальное изменение закона о земле
by Закон о землепользовании 13 Feb '11

13 Feb '11

16 Февраля ВНИМАНИЕ ИЗМЕНЕНИЯ! ПРОБЛЕМЫ ПРИМЕНЕНИЯ ДЕЙСТВУЮЩЕГО ЗАКОНОДАТЕЛЬСТВА В СФЕРЕ ЗЕМЛЕПОЛЬЗОВАНИЯ С УЧЕТОМ ИЗМЕНЕНИЙ 2011 ГОДА (Ч95) Ч/45/Ч*0_95 **** ЧЧ539.68 Объекты земельных правоотношений. Вопросы кадастрового учета земельных участков. Особенности кадастрового учета вновь создаваемых и изменяемых объектов недвижимости в соответствии с Федеральным законом от 24.07.2007 N 221-ФЗ "О государственном кадастре недвижимости". Практические вопросы кадастровой стоимости объектов недвижимости. Право постоянного (бессрочного) пользования землей. Практические вопросы правового статуса землепользователя. Права собственников при разрушении объекта недвижимого имущества. Правовой режим земель сельскохозяйственного назначения. Проблемы распоряжения земельными долями из земель сельскохозяйственного назначения. Арбитражная практика. Приватизация земли. Пути решения вопросов, возникающих при предоставлении земельных участков из государственной и муниципальной собственности. Распоряжение земельными участками, государственная собственность на которые не разграничена. Земли поселений. Понятие разрешенного использования земельных участков с учетом требований Градостроительного кодекса Российской Федерации. Особенности предоставления земельных участков под строительство. Оформление разрешений на строительство с учетом требований земельного законодательства. Особенности предоставления земельных участков под многоэтажными жилыми домами. Практические рекомендации. Урегулирование земельных отношений сособственниками помещений, в том числе нежилых, в многоквартирных домах. Порядок заключения, изменения и расторжения договоров аренды земельных участков, находящихся в государственной или муниципальной собственности с учетом практики арбитражных судов. Некоторые особенности определения сроков по договору аренды земельных участков. Государственная регистрация прав и сделок с землей. Земельные отношения в особых экономических зонах. Налогообложение в сфере землепользования. Информацию можно получить по телефонам: 8 (Ч95) ЧЧ54О95 <> 7/42_9i-98

1 0

World.s Total CPU Power: One Human Brain
by J.A. Terranson 12 Feb '11

12 Feb '11

http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/02/world-computer-data/ By John Timmer, Ars Technica How much information can the world transmit, process, and store? Estimating this sort of thing can be a nightmare, but the task can provide valuable information on trends that are changing our computing and broadcast infrastructure. So a pair of researchers have taken the job upon themselves and tracked the changes in 60 different analog and digital technologies, from newsprint to cellular data, for a period of over 20 years. The trends they spot range from the expected.Internet access has pushed both analog and digital phones into a tiny niche.to the surprising, such as the fact that, in aggregate, gaming hardware has always had more computing power than the world.s supercomputers. The authors were remarkably thorough. For storage media, they considered things like paper, film, and vinyl records, and such modern innovations as Blu-ray discs and memory cards. To standardize their measurements across media, they used Shannon.s information theory to consider data storage in terms of optimally compressed bits. They also tracked technology, noting that in the year 2000, bits of video were compressed using cinepak, which was far less efficient than the current MPEG-4 format; calculations were adjusted accordingly. Even so, there are some significant estimations here. .For example,. the authors note, .after normalization on optimally compressed bits we can say things like .a 6 square-cm newspaper image is worth a 1,000 words... Similar sorts of estimates are required for things like broadcast capability and two-way communications, both of which are compiled as bits-per-second figures. The researchers estimate typical consumption of broadcast media to figure out how much of the existing capacity is used, and they figure that, since telecom equipment is run to maximize the use of its capacity, it.s usually booked to close to its limit. Computing capacity is converted into MIPS, and estimates for the total number and class of chips are available. The big question mark here is mostly in embedded controllers; it.s hard to estimate both their computational capacity and how many are out there. So these are pretty rough estimates, but similar assumptions are made at all four time points examined between 1986 and 2007. That should allow comparisons of trends across the time period, even if the absolute values of the estimates are a bit off. Storage Some trends are very, very obvious. Analog video accounted for over half the data stored in 1986 (vinyl LPs and cassette tapes accounted for over a quarter), and video held 86 percent of all stored data by 1993, squeezing out nearly everything else. By 2000, CDs and digital tape started pushing back, but analog video still stood at 70 percent of all stored data. By 2007, analog video had plunged to a tiny six percent, eclipsed by hard disks, Blu-ray and DVDs, and digital tape. During that time, total storage capacity grew at about 23 percent annually, and it topped out at 2.9 x 1020 bytes.that.s about 300 exabytes, or 61 CDs for everyone on the planet. A similar shift to digital occurred in broadcast media and two-way communications. Back in 1986, 80 percent of broadcast capacity was used for terrestrial TV, although analog cable was already a presence. Today, broadcast TV has fallen to 50 percent; a quarter of the broadcast data is now some form of digital, and analog cable is declining from its peak in 2000. Two-way communications underwent a far more dramatic shift. In 1986, analog phones handled 80 percent of the data, with digital phones taking the other 20 percent; everything else was a rounding error. By 2000, analog telephony was down to two percent of the world.s two-way transmissions. Digital telephony peaked in 1993 at 67 percent; fixed Internet connections accounted for one percent of usage that year. By 2000, it was up to 50 percent, and it.s now at 97 percent. Nothing else cleared one percent. Two-way communications handled 65 exabytes in 2007, dwarfed by broadcasting, which sent a whopping 2 zetabytes of data. But, while broadcasting is increasing at a linear rate, the advent of the Internet has given two-way transmissions a big boost, increasing the bytes transmitted by a factor of 29 in just 7 years. Computation Computation is probably the most varied mix of hardware of the lot. Back in 1986, pocket calculators represented about 40 percent of all computer capacity, beating out PCs at 33 percent and servers at 17 percent. Even then, gaming hardware held a nine percent share. Calculators were gone by 2000, when the PC peaked at 86 percent and the mobile phone/PDA first appeared at 3 percent. By 2007, phones held six percent of world processing power, but the big story was gaming hardware, which shot up to a quarter of the total computational capacity, pushing the PC back down to a two-thirds share. Supercomputers are apparently rare enough not to measure. One surprising result of the research is the amount of total horsepower found in the application-specific space, where the authors considered only DSPs, microcontrollers, and GPUs (GPUs alone account for 97 percent of this category.s capacity). And that capacity is huge, about 30 times that of all the general purpose computation hardware. GPUs account for the lion.s share of the 6.4 x 1018 operations a second that the planet can now perform, and they showed a compound annual growth rate of 86 percent over the study period. Lest we get too enamored with our technological prowess, however, the authors make some comparisons with biology. .To put our findings in perspective, the 6.4*1018 instructions per second that human kind can carry out on its general-purpose computers in 2007 are in the same ballpark area as the maximum number of nerve impulses executed by one human brain per second,. they write. Our total storage capacity is the same as an adult human.s DNA. And there are several billion humans on the planet. Image: Flickr/adafruit. Citation: .The World.s Technological Capacity to Store, Communicate, and Compute Information.. Martin Hilbert and Priscila Lspez. Science, 692-693, Feb. 11, 2011. DOI: 10.1126/science.1200970 Source: Ars Technica.

1 0

--- Hydrocodone 10mg --- 30 for $230 -- 60 for $419 -- VISA Only!!! ---
by Lester Milissa 12 Feb '11

12 Feb '11

-- Hydrocodone 10mg - 30 for $230 - 60 for $419 --- Hydrocodone is a semi-synthetic opioid -- Watson 540 Hydrocodone (Vicodin HP) contains 10 mg hydrocodone and 500 mg acetaminophen 30 for $230 - 60 for $419 - 90 for $593 - 120 for $754 -- VISA Only! Click Here! http://cheappharmacyauto.ru

1 0

Buy Viagra Online with Satisfaction Guarantee. Buy Cheap Generic Viagra or Brand name Viagra
by Sarina Estefana 12 Feb '11

12 Feb '11

Buy VIAGRA Now From $1.25 & Get 12 bonus pills FREE! Generic & Brand Viagra for $1.25/pill from TRUSTED online resellers. Buy Viagra Online with Satisfaction Guarantee. Buy Cheap Generic Viagra or Brand name Viagra http://buydrugsprescription.ru

1 0

<nettime> Glenn Greenwald: The leaked campaign to attack WikiLeaks and its supporters (fwd)
by J.A. Terranson 12 Feb '11

12 Feb '11

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:26:42 +0100 From: nettime's avid reader <nettime(a)kein.org> To: nettime-l(a)kein.org Subject: <nettime> Glenn Greenwald: The leaked campaign to attack WikiLeaks and its supporters Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 21:27:16 +0100 Resent-From: nettime(a)kein.org Resent-To: Nettime <nettime-l(a)kein.org> http://www.salon.com/news/wikileaks/index.html?story=/opinion/greenwald/201… Friday, Feb 11, 2011, Glenn Greenwald There's been a very strange episode being written about the past couple of days involving numerous parties, including me, that I now want to comment on. The story, first reported by The Tech Herald, has been been written about in numerous places (see Marcy Wheeler, Forbes, The Huffington Post, BoingBoing, Matt Yglesias, Reason, Tech Dirt, and others), so I'll provide just the summary. Last week, Aaron Barr, a top executive at computer security firm HB Gary, boasted to the Financial Times that his firm had infiltrated and begun to expose Anonymous, the group of pro-WikiLeaks hackers that had launched cyber attacks on companies terminating services to the whistleblowing site (such as Paypal, MasterCard, Visa, Amazon and others). In retaliation, Anonymous hacked into the email accounts of HB Gary, published 50,000 of their emails online, and also hacked Barr's Twitter and other online accounts. Among the emails that were published was a report prepared by HB Gary -- in conjunction with several other top online security firms, including Palantir Technologies -- on how to destroy WikiLeaks. The emails indicated the report was part of a proposal to be submitted to Bank of America through its outside law firm, Hunton & Williams. News reports have indicated that WikiLeaks is planning to publish highly incriminating documents showing possible corruption and fraud at that bank, and The New York Times detailed last month how seriously top bank officials are taking that threat. The NYT article described that the bank's "counterespionage work" against WikiLeaks entailed constant briefings for top executives on the whistle-blower site, along with the hiring of "several top law firms" and Booz Allen (the long-time firm of former Bush DNI Adm. Michael McConnell and numerous other top intelligence and defense officials). The report prepared by these firms was designed to be part of the Bank of America's highly funded anti-WikiLeaks campaign. The leaked report suggested numerous ways to destroy WikiLeaks, some of them likely illegal -- including planting fake documents with the group and then attacking them when published; "creat[ing] concern over the security" of the site; "cyber attacks against the infrastructure to get data on document submitters"; and a "media campaign to push the radical and reckless nature of wikileaks activities." Many of those proposals were also featured prongs of a secret 2008 Pentagon plan to destroy WikiLeaks. One section of the leaked report focused on attacking WikiLeaks' supporters and it featured a discussion of me. A graph purporting to be an "organizational chart" identified several other targets, including former New York Times reporter Jennifer 8 Lee, Guardian reporter James Ball, and Manning supporter David House. The report claimed I was "critical" to WikiLeaks' public support after its website was removed by Amazon and that "it is this level of support that needs to be disrupted"; absurdly speculated that "without the support of people like Glenn, WikiLeaks would fold"; and darkly suggested that "these are established professionals that have a liberal bent, but ultimately most of them if pushed will choose professional preservation over cause." As The Tech Herald noted, "earlier drafts of the proposal and an email from Aaron Barr used the word 'attacked' over 'disrupted' when discussing the level of support." In the wake of the ensuing controversy caused by publication of these documents, the co-founder and CEO of Palantir Tech, Alex Karp, has now issued a statement stating that he "directed the company to sever any and all contacts with HB Gary." The full statement -- which can be read here -- also includes this sentence: "personally and on behalf of the entire company, I want to publicly apologize to progressive organizations in general, and Mr. Greenwald in particular, for any involvement that we may have had in these matters." Palantir has also contacted me by email to arrange for Dr. Karp to call me to personally convey the apology. My primary interest is in knowing whether Bank of America retained these firms to execute this proposal and if any steps were taken to do so; if Karp's apology is genuine, that information ought to be forthcoming (as I was finishing writing this, Karp called me, seemed sincere enough in his apology, vowed that any Palantir employees involved in this would dealt with the way they dealt with HB Gary, and commendably committed to telling me by the end of the week whether Bank of America or Hunton & Williams actually retained these firms to carry out this proposal). * * * * * My initial reaction to all of this was to scoff at its absurdity. Not being familiar with the private-sector world of internet security, I hadn't heard of these firms before and, based on the quality of the proposal, assumed they were just some self-promoting, fly-by-night entities of little significance. Moreover, for the reasons I detailed in my interview with The Tech Herald -- and for reasons Digby elaborated on here -- the very notion that I could be forced to choose "professional preservation over cause" is ludicrous on multiple levels. Obviously, I wouldn't have spent the last year vehemently supporting WikiLeaks -- to say nothing of aggressively criticizing virtually every large media outlet and many of their leading stars, as well as the most beloved political leaders of both parties -- if I were willing to choose "career preservation over cause." But after learning a lot more over the last couple of days, I now take this more seriously -- not in terms of my involvement but the broader implications this story highlights. For one thing, it turns out that the firms involved here are large, legitimate and serious, and do substantial amounts of work for both the U.S. Government and the nation's largest private corporations (as but one example, see this email from a Stanford computer science student about Palantir). Moreover, these kinds of smear campaigns are far from unusual; in other leaked HB Gary emails, ThinkProgress discovered that similar proposals were prepared for the Chamber of Commerce to attack progressive groups and other activists (including ThinkProgress). And perhaps most disturbing of all, Hunton & Williams was recommended to Bank of America's General Counsel by the Justice Department -- meaning the U.S. Government is aiding Bank of America in its defense against/attacks on WikiLeaks. That's why this should be taken seriously, despite how ignorant, trite and laughably shallow is the specific leaked anti-WikiLeaks proposal. As creepy and odious as this is, there's nothing unusual about these kinds of smear campaigns.The only unusual aspect here is that we happened to learn about it this time because of Anonymous' hacking. That a similar scheme was quickly discovered by ThinkProgress demonstrates how common this behavior is. The very idea of trying to threaten the careers of journalists and activists to punish and deter their advocacy is self- evidently pernicious; that it's being so freely and casually proposed to groups as powerful as the Bank of America, the Chamber of Commerce, and the DOJ-recommended Hunton & Williams demonstrates how common this is. These highly experienced firms included such proposals because they assumed those deep-pocket organizations would approve and it would make their hiring more likely. But the real issue highlighted by this episode is just how lawless and unrestrained is the unified axis of government and corporate power. I've written many times about this issue -- the full-scale merger between public and private spheres -- because it's easily one of the most critical yet under-discussed political topics. Especially (though by no means only) in the worlds of the Surveillance and National Security State, the powers of the state have become largely privatized. There is very little separation between government power and corporate power. Those who wield the latter intrinsically wield the former. The revolving door between the highest levels of government and corporate offices rotates so fast and continuously that it has basically flown off its track and no longer provides even the minimal barrier it once did. It's not merely that corporate power is unrestrained; it's worse than that: corporations actively exploit the power of the state to further entrench and enhance their power. That's what this anti-WikiLeaks campaign is generally: it's a concerted, unified effort between government and the most powerful entities in the private sector (Bank of America is the largest bank in the nation). The firms the Bank has hired (such as Booz Allen) are suffused with the highest level former defense and intelligence officials, while these other outside firms (including Hunton & Williams and Palantir) are extremely well- connected to the U.S. Government. The U.S. Government's obsession with destroying WikiLeaks has been well-documented. And because the U.S. Government is free to break the law without any constraints, oversight or accountability, so, too, are its "private partners" able to act lawlessly. That was the lesson of the Congressional vesting of full retroactive immunity on lawbreaking telecoms, of the refusal to prosecute any of the important Wall Street criminals who caused the 2008 financial crisis, and of the instinctive efforts of the political class to protect defrauding mortgage banks. The exemption from the rule of law has been fully transferred from the highest level political elites to their counterparts in the private sector. "Law" is something used to restrain ordinary Americans and especially those who oppose this consortium of government and corporate power, but it manifestly does not apply to restrain these elites. Just consider one amazing example illustrating how this works. After Anonymous imposed some very minimal cyber disruptions on Paypal, Master Card and Amazon, the DOJ flamboyantly vowed to arrest the culprits, and several individuals were just arrested as part of those attacks. But weeks earlier, a far more damaging and serious cyber-attack was launched at WikiLeaks, knocking them offline. Those attacks were sophisticated and dangerous. Whoever did that was quite likely part of either a government agency or a large private entity acting at its behest. Yet the DOJ has never announced any investigation into those attacks or vowed to apprehend the culprits, and it's impossible to imagine that ever happening. Why? Because crimes carried out that serve the Government's agenda and target its opponents are permitted and even encouraged; cyber-attacks are "crimes" only when undertaken by those whom the Government dislikes, but are perfectly permissible when the Government itself or those with a sympathetic agenda unleash them. Whoever launched those cyber attacks at WikiLeaks (whether government or private actors) had no more legal right to do so than Anonymous, but only the latter will be prosecuted. That's the same dynamic that causes the Obama administration to be obsessed with prosecuting WikiLeaks but not The New York Times or Bob Woodward, even though the latter have published far more sensitive government secrets; WikiLeaks is adverse to the government while the NYT and Woodward aren't, and thus "law" applies to punish only the former. The same mindset drives the Government to shield high-level political officials who commit the most serious crimes, while relentlessly pursuing whistle-blowers who expose their wrongdoing. Those with proximity to government power and who serve and/or control it are free from the constraints of law; those who threaten or subvert it have the full weight of law come crashing down upon them. * * * * * What is set forth in these proposals for Bank of America quite possibly constitutes serious crimes. Manufacturing and submitting fake documents with the intent they be published likely constitutes forgery and fraud. Threatening the careers of journalists and activists in order to force them to be silent is possibly extortion and, depending on the specific means to be used, constitutes other crimes as well. Attacking WikiLeaks' computer infrastructure in an attempt to compromise their sources undoubtedly violates numerous cyber laws. Yet these firms had no compunction about proposing such measures to Bank of America and Hunton & Williams, and even writing them down. What accounts for that brazen disregard of risk? In this world, law does not exist as a constraint. It's impossible to imagine the DOJ ever, ever prosecuting a huge entity like Bank of America for doing something like waging war against WikiLeaks and its supporters. These massive corporations and the firms that serve them have no fear of law or government because they control each. That's why they so freely plot to target those who oppose them in any way. They not only have massive resources to devote to such attacks, but the ability to act without limits. John Cole put it this way: One thing that even the dim bulbs in the media should understand by now is that there is in fact a class war going on, and it is the rich and powerful who are waging it. Anyone who does anything that empowers the little people or that threatens the wealth and power of the plutocracy must be destroyed. There is a reason for these clowns going after Think Progress and unions, just like there is a reason they are targeting Wikileaks and Glenn Greenwald, Planned Parenthood, and Acorn. . . . You have to understand the mindset- they are playing for keeps. The vast majority of the wealth isn't enough. They want it all. Anything that gets in their way must be destroyed. . . . And they are well financed, have a strong infrastructure, a sympathetic media, and entire organizations dedicated to running cover for them . . . . I don't even know why we bother to hold elections any more, to be honest, the game is so rigged. Were a banana republic, and it is just a matter of time before we descend into necklacing and other tribal bullshit. There are supposed to be institutions which limit what can be done in pursuit of those private-sector goals. They're called "government" and "law." But those institutions are so annexed by the most powerful private- sector elites, and so corrupted by the public officials who run them, that nobody -- least of all those elites -- has any expectation that they will limit anything. To the contrary, the full force of government and law will be unleashed against anyone who undermines Bank of America and Wall Street executives and telecoms and government and the like (such as WikiLeaks and supporters), and will be further exploited to advance the interests of those entities, but will never be used to constrain what they do. These firms vying for Bank of America's anti-WikiLeaks business know all of this full well, which is why they concluded that proposing such pernicious and possibly illegal attacks would be deemed not just acceptable but commendable. # distributed via <nettime>: no commercial use without permission # <nettime> is a moderated mailing list for net criticism, # collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets # more info: http://mail.kein.org/mailman/listinfo/nettime-l # archive: http://www.nettime.org contact: nettime(a)kein.org

1 0

Your chips are worth more
by Dr.Carmen Mart�n 12 Feb '11

12 Feb '11

tetragonal shannon agitate egghead boyish nymph implementer instant centum chive diabetic amoral detonate cit euphrates modulo capacitance theism buddhism chaff monetary aggressive archenemy aphasia ciceronian axes appendices apathy bronchus cartographic fight o'leary bertie profound yeasty ektachrome oceanographer boltzmann apatite dollar permissive pygmalion boil parkinson dime bayreuth jew inch pickoff manitoba fiduciary segundo crux lengthy nit acanthus price downriver brushwork keyes lotus belligerent workmen y's maternal baptist allegate sandra breakfast musculature crackle accompany econometric bonnet auschwitz plumage degeneracy kern sesame oboe beginning pastor gordian bent anaplasmosis aberrant osseous titillate field flageolet seedy nation allude increment wacke checksumming biltmore anthropogenic conglomerate whose statutory duplex eumenides gent mortgagor savoyard thayer volkswagen abominate dichotomy flagellate erosible lick paymaster cretan billion azure sharpe impolite moot inaccessible floury cottonmouth barber backplate borne ask arsine hemispheric magnate telephone embarcadero cheap clytemnestra whirl gown bstj drophead remington holdover konrad pad amble brazzaville conversation agreeable demise diagnostician atwood howsoever persuasion eliminate candid buyer bootlegging guam ellison out sorrel extra canaan barth pilgrimage julia midge being treasure accordion arachne telephonic aggression elk corvus jam beforehand canteen argus cobweb painful brindisi crosswort elba ambulant otherwise allison craven ambivalent yolk etc nouveau discussion bestow http://durl.me/5u7nm

1 0