October 2009 - cypherpunks-legacy

Top SexPill On Sale, Only $1.20/pill! FAST Shipping. Works In 20 Min. No Side Effects. beg awju
by Arlena Elin 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

Top SexPill On Sale Only $1.20/pill! FAST Shipping. Works In 20 Min. No Side Effects. OrderViagraToday. Compare our Prices and Save http://kezehon.cn

1 0

Fwd: [IP] Sequoia To Publish Source Code
by R.A. Hettinga 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

Begin forwarded message: > From: Dave Farber <dave(a)farber.net> > Date: October 28, 2009 6:10:07 PM GMT-04:00 > To: "ip" <ip(a)v2.listbox.com> > Subject: [IP] Sequoia To Publish Source Code > > > > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: David Bolduc <bolduc(a)austin.rr.com> >> Date: October 28, 2009 5:46:23 PM EDT >> To: johnmacsgroup(a)yahoogroups.com, Dave Farber <dave(a)farber.net> >> Subject: Sequoia To Publish Source Code >> > >> <http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2009/10/sequoia/> >> >> In Industry First, Voting Machine Company to Publish Source Code >> By Kim Zetter <envelope.gif> October 27, 2009 | 4:53 pm | >> Categories: E-Voting, Elections >> >> >> Sequoia Voting Systems plans to publicly release the source code >> for its new optical scan voting system, the company announced >> Tuesday a remarkable reversal for a voting machine maker long >> criticized for resisting public examination of its proprietary >> systems. >> >> The companys new public source optical-scan voting system, called >> Frontier Election System, will be submitted for federal >> certification and testing in the first quarter of next year. The >> code will be released for public review in November, the company >> said, on its web site. Sequoias proprietary, closed systems are >> currently used in 16 states and the District of Columbia. >> >> The announcement comes five days after a non-profit foundation >> announced the release of its open-source election software for >> public review. Sequoia spokeswoman Michelle Shafer says the timing >> of its release is unrelated to the foundations announcement. >> >> Open-source software allows the public to participate in the actual >> development of the software. Whereas Sequoias public source, or >> disclosed-source, software only allows the public to see software >> that its developers have already created. >> >> In the press release announcing the public-source system, a Sequoia >> vice president is quoted saying that Security through obfuscation >> and secrecy is not security. >> >> Fully disclosed source code is the path to true transparency and >> confidence in the voting process for all involved, said Eric >> Coomer, vice president of research and product development for >> Sequoia, in the press release. Sequoia is proud to be the leader >> in providing the first publicly disclosed source code for a >> complete end-to-end election system from a leading supplier of >> voting systems and software. >> >> Sequoia in fact has been a champion of security through obscurity >> since its been selling voting systems. >> >> The company has long had a reputation for vigorously fighting any >> efforts by academics, voting activists and others to examine the >> source code in its proprietary systems, and even threatened to sue >> Princeton University computer scientists if they disclosed anything >> learned from a court-ordered review of its software. >> >> Princeton University computer scientist Ed Felten, one of the >> targets of Sequoias legal threats, said he was pleasantly >> surprised to see the company opening its new system to examination >> after vehemently resisting it in the past. >> >> I think Sequoia is recognizing that it wont do anymore to just >> urge people to trust them, Felten said, and that people want to >> know that the code that controls these machines is open and that >> experts have had a full chance to look at it. >> >> Given that Sequoia is now acknowledging the value of code >> disclosure as something that can lead to better security rather >> than worse security, as it has claimed in the past, Felten said it >> seems that it should follow that they would now be willing to >> release code for all of their other products as well. >> >> Last year, a judge ordered New Jersey election officials to give >> source code for the states Sequoia AVC Advantage touch-screen >> machines to Princeton University computer scientist Andrew Appel >> and others for a lawsuit that challenged the integrity of Sequoias >> paperless machines. Voting activists had sued the state to >> decommission the units out of security and reliability concerns. >> Appels team found several vulnerabilities with the system, but >> wasnt able to discuss them publicly. >> >> Appel, in a separate issue, also found a discrepancy between >> summary tapes printed from Sequoia touch-screen machines during New >> Jerseys primary election and totals that were recorded on the >> machines memory cards. Summary tapes from machines in one district >> showed a phantom vote for then-presidential-candidate Barack Obama >> that didnt appear in the memory card totals. >> >> The Sequoia machines deployed to Union County, New Jersey, also >> showed that Republican presidential candidates received 61 votes >> when only 60 ballots had been cast in the Republican primary. About >> 60 machines showed such discrepancies. When Union County election >> officials announced that they planned to have Princeton academics >> examine the machines to determine what went wrong, Sequoia >> threatened a lawsuit. >> >> Sequoia initially blamed the problem on election officials for >> pushing the wrong buttons, but later claimed it uncovered a problem >> in its software that was creating the vote errors and announced >> that it had fixed the issue. >> >> Earlier this year, in a separate case, Sequoia agreed, after a >> concerted battle, to hand over its source code to election >> officials in Washington, DC, to investigate why, during the citys >> September 2008 primary election, Sequoias optical-scan machines >> added about 1,500 phantom votes to races on ballots cast in one >> precinct. >> >> Sequoia blamed the problem on static discharge or human error. >> >> After the city demanded to look at the source code to determine the >> problem, Sequoia in turn demanded a $20 million bond from officials >> guaranteeing they wouldnt disclose information about the system. >> Sequoia finally relented to provide the code without a bond, though >> only after the city agreed to keep the companys trade secrets >> confidential. >> >> The election integrity group Voters Unite has compiled a partial >> list of reported problems (.pdf) with Sequoia voting machines. >> >> Spokeswoman Michelle Shafer said Sequoias public source system has >> been in the works for months, and that the announcement this week >> was timed for a National Institute of Standards and Technology >> workshop discussing a common data format for voting systems. >> >> She said the firmware on the companys new Frontier optical-scan >> machines is written in C# programming language and runs on Linux. >> The election management software which sits on a computer at the >> election office and is used to create ballots and tabulate votes >> runs on Microsoft Windows XP and uses a Microsoft SQL database. >> >> Pamela Smith, president of Verified Voting, a group that has long >> lobbied for fully auditable voting systems, applauded Sequoias >> efforts. >> >> Its good to know the vendors are developing a new transparent >> optical-scan system, she said. That is probably the biggest >> recognition of the direction that the voting public wants to see >> the market going. >> >> Asked if Sequoias history of hiding behind its proprietary code >> taints the sincerity of its public source effort, Smith said, Its >> never too late. If youre making a step toward a more transparent >> system, good for you. Thats a good thing. > > > > ------------------------------------------- > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/247/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/247/ > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

1 0

[btns] RFC 5660 on IPsec Channels: Connection Latching
by Eugen Leitl 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

----- Forwarded message from rfc-editor(a)rfc-editor.org -----

1 0

PenisEn1argement Pills that Work! Try it Risk Free - 100% Guaranteeed dgsjwi cp
by Oma Elfriede 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

Are you really HAPPY with yourPenis Size? * PermanentPenis En1argement - En1arge up to 3-4 inches in length in just weeks! * Thicken yourPenis - 1ncrease the girth (width) of yourPenis * Create a BiggerPenisHead - Create a more muscular mushroomed looking PenisHead! * Get More PowerfulErections - Develop 'RockHard' Elrection, each and every time no matter your age! Visit this site for More Info http://uooafhbt.cn 028026690270093034 6569

1 0

Оптимизации финансовых потоков в группе компаний (холдинге)
by Низконалоговые субъекты. 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

3 дня НАЛОГОВОЕ ПЛАНИРОВАНИЕ √ лучшие белые схемы. Полный курс I8-20 Нoяbря [495) 792*--21 22__(495) 742 9I 98 1-й день: Общие положения и налоги с доходов физических лиц (НДФЛ, ЕСН) 1.Понятие и принципы налогового планирования: платить налоги, но не переплачивать. Как можно и как нельзя оптимизировать налоги в 2009 г. с учетом изменений законодательства, судебной практики и тенденций развития правоприменительной практики. "Черные", "серые" и "белые" схемы. 2.Планирование налогообложения доходов физических лиц (ЕСН, НДФЛ). Использование вспомогательных организаций. Использование специальных налоговых режимов. Условия применения всех схем: Непритворный характер заключаемых сделок. Выплата за счет средств специального назначения или за счет средств, не уменьшающих налогооблагаемую прибыль при наличии налогового убытка. Когда это выгодно, расчет эффективности, Дивидендные схемы. Нюансы, рекомендации. Выплата квартальных дивидендов ежемесячно частями. Расчет эффективности, Использование процентных займов и векселей (облигаций). Расчет эффективности. 3.Как компенсировать "выпадение" отчислений в Пенсионный фонд на накопительную часть пенсии, в ФСС и ФОМС при применении налоговых схем, не предусматривающих выплату зарплаты. 4.Специальные методы. 5.Способы подтверждения источников крупных расходов физлиц и когда это необходимо. 6.Продажа имущества физическими лицами без НДФЛ через вклад в уставный капитал и ЕНВД. 2-й день: Налог на прибыль 1.Методы планирования налога на прибыль: краткий обзор. Низконалоговые субъекты. Нюансы и цели применения. Способы переноса налогооблагаемой базы по налогу на прибыль на низконалоговых субъектов. Условия применения способов переноса прибыли. Займы и аналогичные им договоры как способ возвратного рефинансирования √ преимущества и недостатки, риск ведения незаконной банковской деятельности. Безналоговое рефинансирование (возврат) и капитализация выведенной на низконалоговых субъектов прибыли предприятия (холдинга) через уставный капитал или безвозмездную передачу имущества. Ст. 27 Закона "Об ООО". Другие способы безвозвратного рефинансирования. 2.Простое товарищество субъектов упрощенной системы налогообложения, в т.ч. из "низконалоговых" регионов. Нужно или нет платить НДС? Перенос прибыли товарищества на низконалоговых субъектов (УСН 6%, ЕНВД, офшор, физлицо и др.). Отсрочка уплаты налога при непередаче прибыли на счета товарищей. Возможен ли обход с помощью простого товарищества правил налогового учета (гл. 25 НК) и ограничений гл. 26.2 НК РФ в части перечня затрат? 3.Индивидуальный предприниматель на общей системе налогообложения как "льготное предприятие". Нюансы и рекомендации. 3-й день: Схемы, оптимизирующие одновременно НДС и налог на прибыль. Холдинги 1.Методы планирования НДС: краткий обзор. Принципиальная невозможность экономии НДС "белыми" схемами и случаи, когда это все же возможно. 2.Оптимизация НДС и налога на прибыль в оптовой и розничной торговле и производстве с использованием ИП на ЕНВД с уплатой символического налога Нюансы. Ограничение использования. Риски, связанные определением розничной торговли по ГК и рекомендации по использованию схемы в 2009 г. 3.Экономия НДС в производстве, выполнении работ, оказании услуг через разделение финансовых потоков "с НДС" и "без НДС". 4.Примеры "серых" схем ("псевдооптимизации") НДС (как нельзя "оптимизировать"!). 5."Метод холдинга" в налоговом планировании. 6.Два реальных примера комплексного налогового планирования в холдингах. Математическая модель налогообложения холдинга на цифровых примерах, расчет эффективности налоговой оптимизации в холдинге. 7.Принципы налогового планирования использования основных средств. 8.Способы безналоговой и низконалоговой продажи имущества. Риски. 9.Иностранные низконалоговые компании. Выбор низконалоговых юрисдикций. 10.Методы отсрочки уплаты НДС (в т.ч. с авансов) и налога на прибыль. 11.Предприятия и организации инвалидов √ сохраняется ли их актуальность и в каких случаях? Рекомендации, типичные ошибки. 12.Изменения в законодательстве, вступившие в силу с 2009 г.: как они повлияли на налоговые схемы. 13.Ответы на вопросы. По желанию √ индивидуальное экспресс-моделирование схем налогового планирования для компаний-участниц семинара. Стоимость участия: 1 день - 7900 рублей; 2 дня - 12640 рублей; 3 дня - 16900 рублей По вопpоcам подробной информации и pегucтаpацuu обpащайтеcь по тел: (495) 792-двадцать один-двадцать два (495) 742.9I 98 8S8ILPRI

1 0

Order ANY Medication and Receive a FREE Viag. Sample!
by No~Prescriptions~Necessary 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

http://www.offersoil.com

1 0

The raid that rocked the Met: Why gun and drugs op on 6,717 safety deposit boxes could cost taxpayer a fortune
by R.A. Hettinga 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

The hole in the back yard seems to be enjoying a renaissance... Cheers, RAH -------- <http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/moslive/article-1222777/The-raid-rocked-Met- Why-gun-drugs-op-6-717-safety-deposit-boxes-cost-taxpayer-fortune.html?printi ngPage=true > The Daily Mail The raid that rocked the Met: Why gun and drugs op on 6,717 safety deposit boxes could cost taxpayer a fortune More than 500 officers smashed their way into thousands of safety- deposit boxes to retrieve guns, drugs and millions of pounds of criminal assets. At least, that's what was supposed to happen. Adrian Levy and Cathy Scott-Clark investigate By ADRIAN LEVY and CATHY SCOTT-CLARK Last updated at 11:23 PM on 24th October 2009 Operation Rize: An officer uses an angle grinder to open lockers containing safety-deposit boxes The Finchley Road is one of the busiest thoroughfares heading out of London. It leads traffic north past Lord's Cricket Ground and the multimillion-pound houses of some of the country's richest hedge-fund managers all the way to the M1. At three in the afternoon it's always pretty slow going, but on this particular summer Monday the traffic was almost at a standstill. This was partly because the normal three lanes going north had been cut down to one. But it was also because of drivers slowing down to a crawl so they could gawp at the massive police operation unfolding on a busy corner of the road. Police vehicles - both cars and menacing armoured trucks - jammed up two lanes. Dozens of armed officers in bulletproof vests were standing ready, waiting to be called inside an anonymous-looking building. From the sheer manpower and weapons on display it looked like the capital was under another terrorist attack. But while this was the Metropolitan Police's most ambitious operation in its 180-year history, it had nothing to do with national security. Only hours before, at a special briefing, teams from SCD6 (the Economic And Specialist Crime unit) and C019 (Specialist Firearms Command) hunkered down with technicians armed with angle grinders and drills. Also present were dog handlers, their animals trained to sniff out guns, drugs and explosives. In all, more than 500 officers had gathered to receive orders to raid smart addresses in well-heeled parts of the capital. The locations included three of Britain's largest and most well-established safety- deposit box depositories in Edgware, Hampstead and Park Lane as well as an office and the homes of the three directors of Safe Deposit Centres Ltd, which owned the vaults - two in Hampstead and one in Barnet. For most of those at the briefing, arriving just before 3pm on June 2 last year, this was the first they had heard of the operation. Secrecy had been paramount and, with so many involved, keeping the operation 'airtight' had been one of the largest headaches in the pre-planning for what was codenamed 'Rize'. The police rolled through London in a convoy: scores of patrol cars, armed-response vehicles, outriders on their bikes, vans with their windows shielded by metal cages. With a Met film unit recording everything, detectives forced their way past startled security guards, demanding receptionists open the secure doors that led to the normally hushed strong rooms, which in the three centres housed 6,717 safety deposit boxes. Cash found in deposit boxes. More than #53 million in cash was impounded, some of it stuffed into supermarket bags Over the next few hours, the three depositories were transformed into makeshift evidence-sorting centres, decked out with tables to bear the contents of the safety-deposit boxes that were soon to be forced open. Within a day, the first stage of the operation was finished but it would take over ten more to complete the next intricate and prolonged phase. Investigators wearing gas masks and blue overhauls used power tools to chop away at the locked doors that protected the boxes themselves. They had rehearsed this bit for many hours, on mockups, trying numerous methods to get quickly and safely at the deposit boxes. Forged passports found in deposit boxes Diamond drill bits forced down into the locks proved disastrous, potentially damaging evidence inside. Instead, they settled on Makita angle grinders, with which they now effortlessly hacked at the hinges, allowing them to slide out the individual strong boxes, some as small as an A4 pad. Larger ones required a more bullish approach - strong- arm tactics that the police maintained were essential as key-holders would have been unlikely to co-operate. As the first of the boxes was opened, detectives began probing the contents. Many were spilling over with bank notes and jewellery. Each was given a rough designation - for instance, 'cash' or 'gun' - and the words scribbled onto labels before they were placed in sealed evidence bags that were loaded into vans and given an armed escort to their final and secret destination, a secure counting house. Here, every one of the thousands of boxes was to be intimately scrutinised. Not only did detectives have to itemise what they had found but match the contents to a person. A few of the box-holders' identities had been acquired through months of police surveillance. Others were revealed in vault registers seized by police during the raid. Some used aliases and would be hard to track down; more still would be identified by scrutinising the vaults' CCTV cameras. Sixty officers would sift, analyse and count until November 2008 and beyond, racking up #1.4 million in overtime bills alone. There was a lot at stake. Never before had the British police been granted a warrant as broad as this. The raids had been made possible under a controversial law, the Proceeds Of Crime Act (POCA), which came into being in 2002 and introduced an array of wide-ranging new powers to seek out and confiscate dirty money - the houses, cars and boats bought by criminals. However, lawyers watching the police operation unfold were quick to warn that the strong-arming of these vaults and the crashing into each and every box was tantamount to the police having obtained permission to smash down the doors of an entire housing estate. David Sonn, of Sonn Macmillan Walker, one of the largest criminal defence practices in London, says, 'POCA was never intended for this. No one objects when criminals are caught and their assets seized - but shaking down everyone to get to them is specifically not what lawmakers wanted.' A handgun belonging to a suspected drug dealer(left) and items seized include police riot gear, guns and swords (right) Aware of the controversy, Scotland Yard went on a charm offensive, with Assistant Commissioner John Yates giving a series of briefings. 'This is a huge operation to tackle criminal networks who we believe are using safe deposit facilities to hide assets,' he reassured the media. The raids had come after 18 months of scrupulous intelligence gathering that had led detectives to suspect the vault owners were turning a blind eye to the worst kinds of criminality, enabling major villains to conceal, transport and launder their ill-gotten gains, said Yates. Brushing aside concerns about the invasion of privacy, he asserted that 'the majority' of the boxes seized belonged to criminals. Evidence was soon put on show that seemed to underscore his position. More than #53 million in cash was impounded, some of it stuffed into supermarket bags. Most of the money, said the Met, was 'the proceeds of armed robberies and international drug trafficking'. Unnamed Yard sources speculated that some had come from the 2006 Securitas depot robbery in Tonbridge, Kent, and that a mysterious haul of gold grains wrapped in plastic and squashed inside suitcases could be linked to the Brinks Matt heist of 1983. There were sufficient diamonds and pearls to string up as bunting for a street party. CCTV footage of Gavin Leon, whose box held a Glock handgun In one box in Edgware, bags of white powder when tested turned out to be 140g of 81 per cent pure cocaine. Lying next to it was #62,500 in cash. Another box, crammed with notes, was identified as belonging to a Russian woman whose boyfriend was the son of a convicted major- league drugs dealer. A semi-automatic Glock 9mm, the weapon of choice for British gangsters, was lodged in Box 1653 at the Hampstead depository, rented by 44-year-old Gavin Leon, who was jailed for five years last March. A Brocock firearm and nine rounds of ammunition, together with #20,000 in cash, some heroin and weighing scales had been deposited in a box belonging to John Derriviere, a 47-year-old who is now wanted by police. A #100,000 stash left in a box in Edgware turned out to belong to convicted drug dealer David Wilson, 38, from Dagenham, a nest egg he intended to collect after completing a 24-month sentence. Scrutinising the vault's CCTV, police also identified drug trafficker Yaset Berhane, 27, whose box contained #122,000 in cash, some of it marked by Sussex Police in an earlier drugs sting, leading to Berhane's jailing in March 2009 for drug trafficking and money laundering. When vice-squad detectives raided five premises connected to a southeast Asian businesswoman who had more than #100,000 in cash in one box, they found brothels worked by girls who had all potentially been trafficked to the UK, as well as a string of foreign bank transactions showing #800,000 flowing out of the UK. In the months after Rize there were more than 40 arrests and 11 prosecutions. However, by talking to scores of box-holders, none of whom have spoken before, Live has uncovered a different version of Operation Rize, one that shows how the vast majority of those caught up in the raids were innocent. They have had their lives turned upside down over the past 17 months. Many have struggled to recoup their money and possessions, been forced into legal trench warfare with police lawyers and told they must prove how they came by the contents of their boxes. This is also a story told through secret legal papers, including confidentiality agreements struck with some vault depositors whose cases threatened to topple the entire operation. Although the police told a judge that 'nine out of ten' of all of the thousands of box- holders were probably criminally minded, criminally connected or felons, the paper trail reveals that perhaps only as few as ten per cent of the boxes have any connection to serious crime. More worryingly, according to eminent lawyers and barristers, Operation Rize has seen the Yard employ unethical tactics, driving a coach and horses through the new POCA legislation, leaving the Met facing a raft of legal actions that could potentially cost taxpayers millions of pounds. The police raid at Hampstead. Never before had the British police been granted a warrant as broad as this 'Rize is a juggernaut veering out of control,' said one barrister who helped advise on POCA during its passage through Parliament, 'and now a sharp tool that we badly needed to drain criminal cash has been tarnished, potentially damaging it and inhibiting its use'. Within days of the raids, the police set up a helpline to deal with potential inquiries. They were overwhelmed by the response. One detective told Live: 'Everyone presumed we had bagged a load of villains who would not dare claim their iffy property. But thousands of the box-holders complained.' Some of the box-holders contacted lawyers. These were people far removed from the criminal underworld. Many had been with the company from the beginning, drawn to the likeable Jewish businessman who ran it. Leslie Sieff founded the company in 1986, although by the time Operation Rize unfurled he'd been bought out by developer Milton Woolf. In one box there was 140g and cocaine and #62,500 in cash beside it... In another, a Glock 9mm, the weapon of choice for British gangsters Many of the clientele were families who had fled turmoil, pogroms, coups and wars and long had a cultural preference for locking away money and jewels, building up a vehement distrust for the integrity of traditional banks. Here, stepping down the spiral staircase at the back to the darkened boxes below, they felt reassured that their most important possessions were safe. One survivor of Nazi Germany in his seventies told us how he had placed a bag of diamonds there - security if ever he or his descendents needed to run again. 'My wife and I had escaped from Germany with nothing but these gems,' he said. 'She sewed them into our clothing before we crossed occupied Europe, reaching Britain by ship when the jewels were snipped out and locked up.' There was a rabbi too, Yitzchak Schochet, of Mill Hill Synagogue, who said: 'Safety deposit boxes are supposed to be confidential. The whole situation was very unsettling and an intrusion of privacy.' Another client, an Indian millionaire entrepreneur with connections to the House of Lords, described how he was 'treated like a convicted man just because I had wealth in cash'. A Hindu priest described to Live how his family's valuables had been carried in the Sixties from Madhya Pradesh, India, to London 'in a gunny sack'. Among the possessions seized by the police were elaborate handcrafted bracelets, gold rings set with uncut stones, and a bejewelled wedding tikka ornament to be draped on the forehead of a new bride. 'These items had always been in our family,' the priest said, 'We had cash in there too. But now we had to prove how we bought them and where that money, saved over the years, had come from.' Officers painstakingly record the contents of the safety-deposit boxes Under POCA, the burden of proof lay with the box-holders. Finding evidence for wartime treks across Europe, or charting migration stories from the Partition of India and beyond, would cost many of the box-holders tens of thousands of pounds. Mark Richardson, a former military intelligence officer and now a forensic accountant, who has been employed by several box-holders to explain their wealth, told us: 'We had to get one family's diamonds carbon-dated at great expense to demonstrate to the police that they had been cut in the Thirties, which tallied with their story of fleeing Germany before World War II.' Lawyer Sara Teasdale, of City practice Roiter Zucker, whose client had kept more than #900,000 in his box at the vaults in Edgware as cash flow for his business leasing black cabs, said: 'The police are "deep- pocketing" - hauling people through a protracted legal process that they know is so costly that most will roll over.' One angry box-holder rented Box 73 at the Park Lane depository. Alexander Temerko, formerly a vice president of Russian oil giant Yukos, whose billionaire boss Mikhail Khodorkovsky had fallen foul of President Putin, had fled to London as Khodorkovsky was jailed for eight years in Russia. When I got my box back, #9,000 cash and some smaller items of jewellery were missing - a gold baby's bracelet and a gold ring On his arrival in the UK, Temerko had locked five crates of legal documents into his safety-deposit box. However, as a result of Rize, the papers were now in the hands of the Met, which claimed they were evidence of an alleged criminal conspiracy whose participants were British, obliging the police to investigate. Incandescent, Temerko hired an expensive lawyer, Ian Burton, of BCL Burton Copeland. Burton recommended Clare Montgomery, a barrister from Cherie Blaire's chambers, Matrix. Within weeks of Operation Rize, Temerko's team set about applying for a Judicial Review of the judge's decision to grant the controversial Rize warrant and demanded the return of Temerko's files, which they claimed had been taken unlawfully. Montgomery and Burton highlighted case law that specifically stipulated 'fishing expeditions' were barred to the police, even under POCA. In other words, the police were not allowed to seize property in the hope that it would later prove to be criminal. The legal team also demanded sight of the police evidence that had convinced the judge to issue the warrant in the first place. Across town, in Camden, some less high-profile but equally infuriated welltodo box-holders did the same. John and Estelle Selt, aged 62 and 73, wealthy retired shopkeepers, had rented a box for 15 years. Inside it was #150,000 and three valuable bracelets. Determined to clear their names, the Selts put up the #50,000 needed to launch their own Judicial Review that also focused on the lawfulness of the original warrant. Following seven months of legal fencing, with the police guarding its Rize file, the twin Judicial Reviews finally succeeded in prising from the Yard a startling 32-page 'skeleton discussion'. This document - which we were able to obtain after being given a case number by a senior source in Customs and then trawling through court records at the Royal Court building - provides an extraordinary insight into how the police managed to obtain a warrant for Rize. The document provides a summary of two confidential meetings between the Met, its legal advisors and the judge who signed the Rize warrant in May 2008. The document revealed the Met had begun targeting Safe Deposit Centres Ltd in January 2007, in an operation led by DCI Mark Ponting. Armed police during the raid. In all, more than 500 officers had gathered to receive orders to raid smart addresses in well-heeled parts of London Using undercover officers posing as potential customers, Ponting's team of detectives had drawn maps of the vault interiors and tried to determine the number of clients and their identities. They also probed the rigour with which the company enforced Financial Service Authority (FSA) guidelines on properly identifying box-holders and keeping a watch out for anything suspicious. Convinced that the vaults were part of a moneylaundering conspiracy, the Met Commissioner had then asked for RIPA (Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act) warrants to tap the phones of the vault's directors, as well as intercepting their emails and letters - an operation completed by October 2007. Now the police decided to raid, and in an unprecedented move they planned to break into all of the deposit boxes simultaneously. The Met hired Kennedy Talbot, one of Britain's most experienced barristers dealing with POCA. Talbot approached a senior judge at Southwark Crown Court in November 2007. But Southwark rejected the request. The police application was also riddled with simple errors, according to the skeleton document, including a claim by undercover officers that there were 18,000 boxes, three times the actual number. Police also named Leslie Sieff as a director, when available records showed that he had sold the majority of his shareholding as far back as 1998 and would soon resign as a director. Undaunted, the Rize team tried again the following year. This time the Met went out of London to a court that rarely heard complicated money- laundering cases, putting their arguments before Judge Ken Macrae, in Croydon. In a practice known as 'judge shopping', one that is lambasted by judges and lawyers - though not illegal - the police hoped to get the right result by finding a court more sympathetic to their goals and less up to speed with judicial debates on the proportionality of a warrant. David Sonn, of Sonn Macmillan Walker, says: 'This was highly unusual and totally unethical.' The police should have gone back to Southwark. The Met has refused to discuss why they went to Croydon stating simply: 'We will not discuss details of the evidence relied upon for warrant applications.' Having amended the number of safety-deposit boxes to a correct 6,717, and after admitting 'there is a lot we don't know', the police claimed to have found a shredded list behind one of the centres that when reconstituted revealed the identities of boxholders. SCD6 had analysed it and concluded that in a sample of 391 names between '82 per cent and 90 per cent were suspicious or connected to crime'. A statistician was then hired who used this sample of only five per cent of the total client base to conclude that nine out of ten of all of the thousands of box-holders were probably criminally minded or felons, an opinion later expressed more stridently with Judge Macrae, who was told that 'all of the boxes might contain criminal property'. Macrae was swayed. He authorised a warrant under POCA on May 30 2008. Minutes had been taken of the judge's meetings with Talbot and Ponting. They tell how the Rize plan had been rejected by one senior judge only to be put to a second who was wooed with statistics rather than hard new evidence. Other court documents obtained show that the legal teams preparing their judicial reviews took the 32-page transcript to pieces and in so doing lambasted the whole Rize operation. 'The warrant was extraordinarily broad,' Temerko's team warned, and 'completely unprecedented', representing the widest ever seen by lawyers in Britain, one that on this ground alone was liable to be quashed by High Court judges. The police had only provided the court with 'bare assertions' rather than hard evidence. A High Court judge was advised, 'The gross interference in privacy outweighed any benefit to the investigation.' The file concludes: 'This is a remarkable and untenable case of guilt by association' that trampled on rights to privacy enshrined by Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights. This guarantees all individuals the right to privacy, barring states from intruding unless serious crimes have been committed. Siobhan Egan from lawyers Lewis Nedas added: 'The police had also made some bizarre errors.' The POCA legislation barred the seizing of legal papers but they had five crates belonging to Temerko. The police changed course. They notified Temerko's legal team that they were now acting under the Criminal Justice and Police Act, which allowed such privileged documents to be held. 'However, this law can only be invoked when a written notice has been given to everyone, box-holders and vault owners,' said Egan. Alerted, the police ran around serving the directors of the Park Lane vault and their box-holders with written notices - without realising that the law could not be applied retrospectively, and that the notice had to be handed over 'at the time' of the raids. On June 4 2009, the Met caved in. Temerko was offered an agreement. In exchange for dropping his Judicial Review, all five crates of his documents were returned 'in sealed police evidence bags', with the police even agreeing to pay his costs, as well as accounting for their own, a combined figure estimated at more than #250,000. In return, the Russian agreed to keep 'the terms of this consent order confidential'. His silence had been assured. The Selts won too. A similar deal was offered to them, their goods returned and costs paid. Statistics were by now causing the police significant problems. Mark Taylor, a former fraud investigator for HM Customs and Excise, now an associate director of Vantis, an accountancy firm advising families caught up in Operation Rize, kept a tally. Of the 6,717 boxes targeted by detectives in the biggest raid in the Met's history, just over half were occupied. And of those that were full, 2,838 boxes were now handed back, a figure that represents 80 per cent of the number of boxes seized. Eight out of ten box owners were provably innocent. Taylor said: 'Of the #53 million in cash that the police took, #20 million has also been given back and #33 million is now being referred to as "under investigation", of which only #2.83 million has been confiscated or forfeited by the courts.' This figure represents just over five per cent of the total money stored in the vaults, although the Met has 690 ' suspect' boxes that it is still investigating. That means of the total number of boxes, around ten per cent are being probed for villainy, a long way from the nine out of ten cases the Met surmised they would find while wooing Judge Macrae. Lawyers have seen their Rize cases squeezed and intimidated. Sara Teasdale revealed how the police were first adamant that her client's money was criminal cash, threatening forfeiture, only to try and turn the box-holder's business partner against him, enticing him to wear a wire so as to entrap him into admitting it was also money stolen from his own company. Teasdale said: 'They first tried "wrong money". Then it was company money. Even when they dropped criminal proceedings against him in February 2009, they inexplicably continued with civil forfeiture proceedings.' The Yard was trying all it could to get the cash. 'They were sitting on almost #1 million, and having referred to my client anonymously in press releases as an example of why they had raided, they needed to win.' But this case was recently lost by the Met too, leaving the box-holder with #200,000 in fees, money he is now seeking back from the police. Others going after the Yard include some who claim that money and jewels have gone missing from their boxes. Many have spoken to Live about their plight, although they have asked not to be named because the information is personal. One goldsmith from north London fought for over a year to get his #40,000 cash and valuables back, then claimed it was not all there. He has now filed an official complaint. 'The police kept saying, "Why have you got all this cash?" and I showed them my books.' His premises were raided twice, the second time by 20 officers. 'They found nothing because I had done nothing and eventually this summer, everything was returned to me. But #10,000 was gone - and my wife's diamond earrings.' The Met has strenuously denied all allegations of theft, pointing out that anyone stealing from the boxes would have been caught on camera since officers videoed the entire operation. Another box-holder who is alleging theft, a wealthy Russian imigri party-planner from north London, who had #64,000 in cash and #250,000 worth of jewellery, including heirlooms from Russia, successfully challenged the police to produce the video. 'I am meticulous,' she said. 'I have a receipt for everything. When I got my box back, #9,000 cash and some smaller items of jewellery were missing - a gold baby's bracelet and an 18-carat gold ring.' The initial police footage, she claims, had a time code and showed her box being carried to a table. But then the tape was interrupted and when it restarted the footage was being shot from a new camera, at a different angle and without a time code, with real time having moved on many seconds. She told Live: 'It only takes seconds for a small envelope of cash or a gold ring to be swiped from the table and into someone's pocket. I was staggered.' After failing to get adequate answers from the Met's own Directorate of Professional Standards, her lawyers have gone to the independent Police Complaints Authority, along with 70 other box- holders. The Met maintains Operation Rize was an absolute success. DCI Ponting said: 'The MPS is committed to targeting those who benefit from the proceeds of crime, restraining and confiscating criminal property and seeking to forfeit cash and assets under the Proceeds Of Crime Act 2002. As in the case of Operation Rize, this legislation enables the police to reduce harm to communities, disrupt criminal networks and take out community criminal role models. By taking the cash out of criminal lifestyles, money is put back into the public purse and contributes to restoring community confidence. 'In 2008/9 the MPS deprived 4,787 criminals of #21 million. Comparative figures for 2002 are 239 criminals deprived of #1.5 million. In addition to #21 million actually permanently deprived from criminals, the MPS also has a cash balance of #40 million detained under POCA awaiting forfeiture and perhaps as much again in restrained assets. This equates to over #100 million in all, of which Operation Rize has been a major contributor.' Detective Chief Superintendent Nigel Mawer from SCD6 added, 'Rize continues to be a hugely complex inquiry. We still have almost 700 boxes under active investigation as well as a number of trials pending.' However, Lawyer David Sonn said: 'Would an operation like Rize ever be run again? I doubt it.' Facing hefty fees for defending itself before two Judicial Reviews, being pursued for millions of pounds in legal fees by innocent box- holders, and now facing inquiries into theft, the political, judicial and financial costs of the operation are beginning to stack up. And yet when it first kicked off, one of the things that had endeared Rize to everyone was its revenue-earning capacity, something revealed in a tucked-away minute of the Metropolitan Police Authority from September 2008. Warning that the police were lagging behind in meeting targets set to seize criminals' assets, it stated: 'To achieve the target a further #36.6 million of assets need to be seized in the remaining nine months.' This was 'a challenging target'. However, 'with the emerging results from Operation Rize, the seizures are likely to make a major contribution toward the final total.' In fact, the operation may end up costing the taxpayer a fortune. Rize has certainly helped put a number of hard-line criminals behind bars, but at what cost?

1 0

Darpa Looks to Send the Internet Into Orbit
by Eugen Leitl 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/10/darpa-looks-to-send-the-internet-in… Darpa Looks to Send the Internet Into Orbit * By Noah Shachtman Email Author * October 27, 2009 | * 11:34 am | * Categories: DarpaWatch Therebve been satellites orbiting Earth for half a century. But getting information to and from them is still a pain. Which is why Pentagon research arm Darpa is looking to finally hook the orbiting spacecraft up with reliable broadband connections. Itbs part of a larger movement to extend terrestrial networks into space, and eventually build an b Interplanetary Internet.b In the meantime, we might even get less-than-crappy satellite internet service b if the project works out, of course. Darpa recently issued a request for information about supplying b persistent broadband ground connectivity for spacecraft in low-Earth orbit.b The idea would be to give these satellites a near-constant feed of b 100 kbps or higherb two-way connectivity, with end-to-end transmission latency of less than a second. Unlike most Darpa projects, which are meant to pay off years or decades in the future, this would be a near-term attempt. The agency wants the system b operational in the 2012 to 2013 time frame.b Brian Weeden, a former officer with U.S. Air Force Space Command and a technical adviser with the Secure World Foundation, says Darpabs help would be most welcome. b The protocol that the internet uses b TCP/IP b wasnbt really designed with space in mind. For one, the delay times between nodes can be big. One way to GEO [geosynchronous orbit] is 300 milliseconds at the speed of light, there and back over half a second of built-in network lag before anything else adds to it. Thatbs one reason why getting internet from satellites sucks right now,b he tells Danger Room. b If you go lower than GEO, then of course satellites are always moving and thus not always overhead. It would be a huge help to have a protocol that can automatically store and forward packets when the satellite is present or not,b Weeden adds. For years, Darpa b which backed much of the early research into the internet b has been working with other networking godfathers to put together an b interplanetary internet.b b Webre pretty used to it but the internet is actually a pretty revolutionary construct. That you can drop a packet of data on it with only a starting and destination address and it finds its way there without any directions is pretty astonishing,b Weeden explains. b The payloads on most satellites donbt work that way b payload operators need to configure specific transponders for specific users and applications. So part of this is trying to bring those internet concepts of automatic routing and network config to satellite constellations, and perhaps to make them extensions of the land-based internet infrastructure.b Darpabs deadline for ideas of how to pull it off is Nov. 5.

1 0

Rep1icaRo1exWatches, Chanel, IWC Watches - Over 10000 Watches Models ljwj 8e16
by Chassidy Annette 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

Offer top rep1ica watches up to 80% brand name at affordable price , select your favorite designer fake watch fromRo1ex, Omega, Patek Philippe, Piaget, IWC, Breitling, Tag Heuer, Cartier, Chopard, Bvlgari, Chanel, Movado, Ebel, Oris, Michele, Gucci and so on Visit here http://usfshdcs.cn 4679 09705424980121922

1 0

Rep1icaRo1exWatches, Chanel, IWC Watches - Over 10000 Watches Models fwbp ms
by Blythe Erline 28 Oct '09

28 Oct '09

Offer top rep1ica watches up to 80% brand name at affordable price , select your favorite designer fake watch fromRo1ex, Omega, Patek Philippe, Piaget, IWC, Breitling, Tag Heuer, Cartier, Chopard, Bvlgari, Chanel, Movado, Ebel, Oris, Michele, Gucci and so on Visit here http://usfshdcs.cn 6072166267535107535 20844760568973

1 0