December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

State Department Advisory Group
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I'm surprised they don't want a sperm sample, too. Ooops. That's right. Sexism... Cheers, Bob Hettinga --- begin forwarded text X-Sender: aboss(a)vm.temple.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 10:15:31 -0500 Reply-To: Digital Signature discussion <DIGSIG(a)VM.TEMPLE.EDU> Sender: Digital Signature discussion <DIGSIG(a)VM.TEMPLE.EDU> From: Amelia Boss <ABOSS(a)VM.TEMPLE.EDU> Subject: State Department Advisory Group To: DIGSIG(a)VM.TEMPLE.EDU The meeting of the State Department Advisory Committee on Private International Law Study Group on Electronic Commerce will be held from 10am to 5pm Monday December 15 and 9am to 5pm on Tuesday December 16 in Washington DC. The meeting will be held at the Department of State, Conference Room 1107. Use the 21st and D Street entrance. To expedite admission for those of you wishing to attend, please provide your name, affiliation, address, telephone number, date of birth and social security number by close of business, Wednesday, December 10. Please provide this information to the Office of the Legal Adviser (L/PIL), Department of State, Suite 355 South Building, 2430 E Street NW, Washington DC 20037-2800, fax 202-776-8482, or by telephone 202-776-8420, attention Rosalie Gonzales. Hotel Accommodations: There are two hotels that have agreed to offer, on a space-available basis, rooms at the government rate ($108/single; 128/double). However, you must advise the hotel when making arrangements that you are a State Department invitee and that the government rate should be applied. They, in turn, will contact the L/PIL to verify (authenticate?) that you are on the list of attendees, so please make sure that you have followed the procedures in the previous paragraph. The two hotels are the Windham Bristol Hotel at 2430 Pennsylvania Avenue NW (walking distance to State and two blocks from Foggy Bottom metro) [202-955-6400; fax 202-955-5765] and the State Plaza Hotel at 2117 E Street NW (across from the State Department) [phone 202-861-8200; fax 202-659-8601]. Hope to see many of you there. --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/ Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http://www.fc98.ai/>

1 0

ISBN and EAR
by Steve Schear 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

The Administration, through the EAR, has attempted to maintain the fiction that there is a qualitative difference between intellectual works made tangible in paper and those in electronic form. Can a Federal court's introduction of evidence procedure be used to establish the interchageability of IP works in paper and elecronic form and if so can these rules be applied to the EAR? The ISBN is an identification system for books and other media which allows for order-processing by booksellers, libraries, universities, wholesalers and distributors. It identifies a title or edition of a title and is unique to that title or edition. The ISBN system was established in 1968 as a standard for books and other monographic publications. Today, the scope of the system has expanded to include other media such as calendars, spoken word audiocassettes, videocassettes and electronic media. Is anyone aware of a federal case, accepted into the SC, in which an work of intellectural property (esp. a book) admitted as evidence was referenced solely by its ISBN? Might this direction a legally fruitful way to overturn the EAR fiction? --Steve

2 1

Your Papers, Please
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Network World, November 15, 1997: Welcome To Cyberspace. Your Papers Please? About a year ago, the Treasury Department issued a little-noticed discussion document entitled "Selected Tax Policy Implications of Global Electronic Commerce" (www.ustreas.gov) Beavering away in obscurity, these unelected technocrats have almost finished turning the broad "implications" into detailed regulations. Like most tax rulings, these regulations require no further congressional action to have the force of law. So, while rehabilitated Clinton apparatchik Ira Magaziner was out mesmerizing the digerati with his "Framework for Global Electronic Commerce," promising free markets and no new taxes, the green-eyeshade boys were quietly laying the groundwork to launch the IRS into cyberspace. ... The classic strategy of forcing reporting requirements on key "taxing points," such as banks, clearinghouses and other financial institutions, is not likely to work as the need for intermediation on the Internet will be vastly reduced. In many ways, that's the whole point of electronic commerce. Any reporting burdens must be pushed out to the end points of each transaction. How will this be done? This is where Big Brother may arrive big time. Under active consideration is a plan to require taxpayers to obtain digital IDs for all electronic transactions, keeping records that could be examined on audit. The IDs would be issued by IRS certified agencies, subject to government developed standards to ensure that proper identity checks are performed before anyone is allowed to shop online. The IRS would enforce this by issuing its own digital certificates to issuers of digital IDs so that they can electronically prove that they have received IRS certification. The technology they need to make this happen is available. All that's missing are the regulations forcing compliance. So, stay tuned. If you enjoyed the encryption key escrow debate, you'll love this one. Bill Frezza -----

7 7

READ THIS FIRST!
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Besides the device, the box should contain: * Eight little rectangular snippets of paper that say "WARNING" * A plastic packet containing four 5/17 inch pilfer grommets and two club-ended 6/93 inch boxcar prawns. YOU WILL NEED TO SUPPLY: a matrix wrench and 60,000 feet of tram cable. IF ANYTHING IS DAMAGED OR MISSING: You IMMEDIATELY should turn to your spouse and say: "Margaret, you know why this country can't make a car that can get all the way through the drive-through at Burger King without a major transmission overhaul? Because nobody cares, that's why." WARNING: This is assuming your spouse's name is Margaret. -- Dave Barry, "Read This First!"

1 0

following cypher algorithm ?
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Does anybody know following cypher algorithm ? Symmetric cipher : BATON , JUNIPER Public key cipher : KEA , MAYFLY

2 1

Re: Factor a 2048-bit number
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Theodor Schlickmann and Peter Trei have expressed some skepticism regarding the 2048-bit number which I believe can be factored. I confess that I do not know the exact method required, but I am pretty sure it exists. Hint 1: The method will not work to factor 2048-bit numbers in the general case. Hint 2: There is an observation which suggests the number may be factored. A one word hint will reveal this observation. (I want to hold off on Hint 3 for a little while in case somebody is already working on the problem. If anybody wants me to withhold Hint 3, please post a message to the list and I may do so. It seems to me that it will be more fun to solve without Hint 3.) Wouldn't it be neat to actually factor a 2048-bit number which was the product of two large primes? Monty Cantsin Editor in Chief Smile Magazine http://www.neoism.org/squares/smile_index.html http://www.neoism.org/squares/cantsin_10.htm -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.2 iQEVAwUBNHMvmpaWtjSmRH/5AQHWVQf+KvPxxNw8bHWhxVq//I7ic8dwtmVa2AS6 zpl77qI6vkeMfjFv0UxP5XXIEDH13cy7nlgOHjmvSc/IjC2A0+twQEgxUBzLV5pe Ltpnbw/RM/vqs5wX7d7KhY+kUxQR77ElUANVVve5sQNn1cDPAIQcQnC7UL7oAk0B Wo2/xlCoTncUkXwPX94PLk1hjdARimpvcoBYmtYcE0mnwNZfzTTU4ExgxAbiOq5H /oosTwnEjb+bDU7uPr9H/XxUkdGxa4PfWEw9C+folUbEtjFjJznfn78c45fz2IYs 6S/oywGnKlWEU9xS9Yg8fnIDCWB1V6tTEW3PGJDp5fwi3x06i298eQ== =sJgk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

1 0

Did ANYONE get this number?
by amp＠pobox.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Though it will probably be changed soon, this could be a useful number to have... amp Oops! President's fax line made public Copyright (C) 1997 Nando.net Copyright (C) 1997 The Associated Press WASHINGTON (November 20, 1997 5:06 p.m. EST) -- The House committee investigating campaign fund raising briefly posted President Clinton's personal fax number on the Internet this week, despite a request that it keep the number private. White House press secretary Mike McCurry called the incident "a procedural lapse" on the part of the House Government Reform and Oversight Committee chaired by Rep. Dan Burton, R-Ind. A committee spokesman said the public posting of the number of the president's fax machine was a quickly corrected and "inadvertent" mistake with no malicious intent. McCurry said the White House is concerned because the fax machine, located just outside the Oval Office, serves as the president's sounding board, a personal link to hundreds of friends and acquaintances around the country. "It would be a source of concern to the White House because that's a very valuable way in which the president maintains contact with an incredibly diverse group of Americans," McCurry said. "It's not the first time that they've had some procedural lapses," McCurry said of the Burton committee. The incident was reported Thursday by Roll Call, a newspaper that covers Congress. The committee obtained the fax number when it was mentioned by former Clinton political consultant Dick Morris during a deposition last August. The committee failed to black it out when it posted the Morris deposition on the Internet Tuesday. Will Dwyer, a spokesman for the committee said the number was available to the public for no more than an hour. He contended committee lawyers had never definitively promised Morris to keep it private although Morris did ask that it and his private phone numbers not be disclosed. "I don't think we have breached any agreement," Dwyer said. Dwyer took issue with McCurry's assertion that the incident was one of a series of lapses on the committee's part. "He's making a mountain out of a molehill," he said. "As soon as we discovered it we corrected it. There was no intent for anything malicious to occur here." ********************************************************* To post a message to AEN NEWS, address it to news(a)aen.org. ---------------End of Original Message----------------- === E-mail: amp(a)pobox.com Date: 11/21/97 Time: 01:11:39 Visit me at http://www.pobox.com/~amp -export-a-crypto-system-sig -RSA-3-lines-PERL #!/bin/perl -sp0777i<X+d*lMLa^*lN%0]dsXx++lMlN/dsM0<j]dsj $/=unpack('H*',$_);$_=`echo 16dio\U$k"SK$/SM$n\EsN0p[lN*1 lK[d2%Sa2/d0$^Ixp"|dc`;s/\W//g;$_=pack('H*',/((..)*)$/) Have you seen http://www.public-action.com/SkyWriter/WacoMuseum ===

1 0

Re: Environmentalism (was Re: Crimes) (fwd)
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> try to make a model of a complex system, and push your models beyond design > constraints, you are going to have some amount of difficulty. Predicting > weather a decade hence is about a tough as predicting the market over the > same time period... Or trying to predict the content of the Cypherpunks Mailing list!

1 0

CNET Dispatch: Comdex wrap-up; Web cops (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 1997 18:14:58 -0800 > From: CNET Digital Dispatch <dispatch(a)CNET.com> > Subject: CNET Dispatch: Comdex wrap-up; Web cops > CNET Digital Dispatch: Comdex wrap-up; Web cops > November 20, 1997 > This week on CNET: [deleted] > 2. How cops fight online crime [deleted] > 10. "Your turn": revolution of the Net [deleted] ____________________________________________________________________ | | | The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there | | be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. | | | | -Alan Greenspan- | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Algebra down?
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, Been getting bounces from Algebra for the last few hours. Anyone know what's up on that end? ____________________________________________________________________ | | | The financial policy of the welfare state requires that there | | be no way for the owners of wealth to protect themselves. | | | | -Alan Greenspan- | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0