December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Tossing your cookies [Re: Why no "Banner Ad Eaters"?]
by Brian B. Riley 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On 1/25/98 12:16 PM, Jim Gillogly (jim(a)acm.org) passed this wisdom: >Heinz-Juergen Keller skribis: >> Just a silly? question on cookies: >> What will happen if I just link cookies.txt to /dev/null ? >> Is there anything speaking against this solution? > >Works fine on Unix and Linux systems if you're not a cookie fan: >the remote sites think you've eaten their cookies, but you've >merely frisbeed them into the bit bin. > >It's better than telling Netscape you want to be asked: some >sites set a dozen cookies per hit, seems like, and saying "no" >to each gets immediately tedious. If you tell Netscape to reject >them, some sites won't serve you the content. Setting the browser >to accept everything and linking cookies.txt to /dev/null works >well for me. On a Mac you can erase the cookies file and then create a folder by the same name in its place ... Brian B. Riley --> http://members.macconnect.com/~brianbr For PGP Keys <mailto:brianbr@together.net?subject=Get%20PGP%20Key> "One of the deep mysteries to me is our logo, the symbol of lust and knowledge, bitten into, all crossed with in the colors of the rainbow in the wrong order. You couldn't dream of a more appropriate logo: lust, knowledge, hope, and anarchy." -- Gassee - Apple Logo

1 0

Do you take credit cards ?
by majordomo＠bulkemailserver.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Can you say "yes I accept credit cards"? If you can't but want to, I can help! For as little as $295 or lease a system for as low as $16 per month you can have all the advantages of accepting credit cards. NO long term commitments, NO statement fees, NO annual fees , NO hassles. Increase sales, Increase impulse buys, Increase your credibility, INCREASE YOUR BOTTOM LINE Lowest discount rate in the industry, Fast approval, 24 hour a day helpline VISA-MASTERCARD-DISCOVER-AMERICAN EXPRESS put them to work for YOU! Discount fees as low as 1.49% Get started for as little as $20 All types of business accepted Retail Internet Mail Order In Home Services For details , complete pricing , pictures and options call me at 1-215-470-8034 anytime Tell me your name, type of business, expected credit card volume , phone and fax number your Isn"t it time your business got an advantage?

1 0

Re: Executing Kaczynski
by Greg Broiles 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>The more important silence is about the instant sentencing of the >Unabomber compared to Jim Bell's sentencing. What _is_ happening with >Jim? Kaczynski was not sentenced immediately - but the crimes he plead guilty to and the legal posture of the prosecution (e.g., the withdrawn notice of intent to seek the death penalty) make his sentence a foregone conclusion. He is still, however, subject to the same pre-sentencing rigamarole that Jim was; see, for example, this excerpt from the transcripts of the court proceeding on 1/22 - (at <http://cnn.com/SPECIALS/1997/unabomb/transcripts/9801/012298.txt>). 9THE COURT: Okay. There will be a special assessment of 10 $650 imposed for your guilty plea pursuant to federal law. 11Mr. Kaczynski, do you understand those possible 12 consequences of your plea? 13THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor. 14THE COURT: Under the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984, the 15 United States Sentencing Commission has issued guidelines for 16 judges to follow in determining the sentence in a criminal 17 case. Have you and your attorneys talked about how the 18 Sentencing Commission guidelines might apply to your case? 19(Discussion off the record between the defendant, 20 Ms. Clarke and Mr. Denvir.) 21THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor. 22THE COURT: Do you understand that the Court will not be 23 able to determine the guideline sentence for your case until 24 after the pre-sentence report has been completed and your 25 attorney and the Government have had an opportunity to object SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347 3810 1 to any of the findings in that report? 2THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor. 3THE COURT: Do you understand that after it has been 4 determined what guideline applies to a case, the judge has the 5 authority in some circumstances to impose a sentence that is 6 more severe or less severe than the sentence called for by the 7 guidelines? 8THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor. 9THE COURT: How about the question of appeal? Has that 10 been waived? 11MR. LAPHAM: Yes, Your Honor. It's contained at page 7, 12 beginning at line 16. 13THE COURT: Okay. Do you understand that by entering 14 into the plea agreement you have entered with the Government, 15 you will have waived or given up your right to appeal all or 16 any part of your plea of guilty and anything else that occurs 17 during this conviction hearing and anything that occurs during 18 your sentencing hearing? 19THE DEFENDANT: Yes, Your Honor. 20THE COURT: Do you understand that parole has been 21 abolished and that if you plead guilty, you will spend the 22 rest of your life in prison and you will never be released or 23 paroled? 24THE DEFENDANT: I understand that, Your Honor. 25THE COURT: Do you understand that if the sentence is SUSAN VAUGHAN, CSR No. 9673 -- (916) 446-1347 3811 1 more severe than you expected, you will still be bound by your 2 plea and will have no right to withdraw it? 3THE DEFENDANT: I understand it, Your Honor. 4THE COURT: Do you understand that if I do not accept 5 the sentencing recommendation in your plea agreement, you will 6 still be bound by your plea and will have no right to withdraw 7 it? 8THE DEFENDANT: I understand that, Your Honor. [...] -- Greg Broiles | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell: gbroiles(a)netbox.com | Export jobs, not crypto. http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | http://www.parrhesia.com

1 0

Update on New Zealand crypto policy
by pgut001＠cs.auckland.ac.nz 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

As part of my recent effort to prepare a useful home page after 2 years of having instead a mini text adventure, I've finally got around to finishing off the web page containing the recent history of, and current state of, New Zealands crypto export policy as decided by several intelligence agencies and a supporting cast of bungling bureaucrats. This policy has resulted in New Zealand enjoying the dubious distinction of having the strictest export controls on earth, with everything ranging from crypto hardware down to software, library books, computer magazines, and journals being restricted from export. It's not even possible for a university to publish academic research without prior permission from a government agency, and the requirements for obtaining this permission are structured to ensure that they can never be fulfilled. You can find the information on: http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/ The page also contains links to a sizeable collection of never-before- published documents including correspondence with relevant government agencies, and media reports on the situation. If you're going to send me mail about this, please note that I'll be at Usenix in San Antonio for the next week, so it'll take awhile for me to reply. My PGP key's at the bottom of my home page if you need it. Peter.

1 0

Announcement: RPK InvisiMail released on 12 Jan, 1998
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text From: RPK New Zealand Ltd <info(a)rpkusa.com> Date: Fri, 23 Jan 1998 15:24:28 Subject: Announcement: RPK InvisiMail released on 12 Jan, 1998 You have received this message because at some time during the past two years you have requested to be put on the RPK New Zealand Ltd. company mailing list. (We're the Fast Public Key Encryption company). If you wish to be removed from the list, please forward this message to remove(a)rpkusa.com -------------------------------- RPK New Zealand Ltd. in a joint venture with Virtually Online Ltd. has released RPK InvisiMail, a standards-based e-mail security application for use with Internet mail software (SMTP/POP3). The product offers the strongest encryption available anywhere in the world. Since it was built outside the United States, it is also available all over the world with strong encryption. RPK InvisiMail is also the easiest product of its type to setup and use which makes it quite unique. You can learn more about this product by reading the press release below or by visiting the web site at www.InvisiMail.com. We are also offering FREE downloads of the RPK InvisiMail Intro product. Please give it a try and pass it along to anyone you like. -------------------------------- For Immediate Release Contact: Sal Cataldi, Cataldi PR +1 212.941.9464, scataldi(a)earthlink.net, www.InvisiMail.com RPK InvisiMail(tm), secure Internet e-mail with globally available strong encryption for Microsoft, Netscape platforms SAN FRANCISCO, Jan. 12, 1998 - InvisiMail Ltd (www.InvisiMail.com) announced today immediate worldwide availability of RPK(tm) InvisiMail(tm), a standards-based e-mail security add-in for Microsoft, Netscape and other POP3/SMTP Internet e-mail clients and gateway servers. Tested and certified by the International Computer Security Association (www.ncsa.com) RPK InvisiMail automatically and transparently encrypts e-mail messages and attachments, authenticates the sender and verifies the contents of each message have not been changed in transit. RPK InvisiMail is globally available with high strength encryption. InvisiMail and the underlying RPK encryption algorithm were developed outside the United States. Therefore, InvisiMail is not subject to restrictive U.S. export policies. RPK InvisiMail is as easy to set up and use as anti-virus software, and just as important. While Microsoft and Netscape battle each other with incompatible and difficult to use security offerings, InvisiMail seamlessly integrates with ALL popular POP3/SMTP e-mail products including Netscape, Microsoft, Eudora, Pegasus, Calypso -- more than any other solution available today -- making it the preferred e-mail security product for multi-platform use, worldwide. All InvisiMail users can send the FREE InvisiMail Intro version to anyone worldwide, providing compatibility without requiring others to purchase anything, making InvisiMail unique among e-mail security offerings. "Most people don't realize that their e-mail can be forged, altered or read by anyone, any time, without any evidence," said Jack Oswald, President and CEO of RPK Ltd. "Without products like RPK InvisiMail, communications on the Internet are untrustworthy." InvisiMail uses the RPK Fast Public Key Encryptonite(tm) Engine, the strongest cryptography available worldwide today. RPK is dramatically faster than the well-known RSA algorithm, yet just as secure. RPK has been analyzed by world class cryptographers who have issued reports on the security and integrity of the technology. "InvisiMail is the easiest, fastest, most transparent e-mail security product I have seen," said Kevin Shannon, President of net*Gain, a specialist in launching Internet companies. "This is the product we've all been waiting for." As part of its official launch, InvisiMail Professional is available FREE to all New Zealand residents for ninety days. RPK InvisiMail is available in two desktop versions: Intro (FREE) and Professional (introductory price $29.95). RPK InvisiMail Enterprise Gateway Server will be available Q2 1998. InvisiMail can be downloaded from: www.InvisiMail.com. All trademarks and registered trademarks are those of their respective companies. *** --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "... however it may deserve respect for its usefulness and antiquity, [predicting the end of the world] has not been found agreeable to experience." -- Edward Gibbon, 'Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire' The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/ Ask me about FC98 in Anguilla!: <http://www.fc98.ai/>

1 0

Document destruction services
by ichudov＠Algebra.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, I have a box of confidential papers that I do not need. I would prefer not to just throw them away, but to either shred or incinerate them. Due to the sheer size of the box, it is not practical for me to buy and use a home shredder. Would anyone have a suggestion as to what is the best way to destroy them? Aer there any services that do it inexpensively? Thank you igor

3 3

Document destruction services (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi Igor, Forwarded message: > Subject: Document destruction services > Date: Sat, 24 Jan 1998 09:36:54 -0600 (CST) > From: ichudov(a)algebra.com (Igor Chudov @ home) > I have a box of confidential papers that I do not need. I would prefer not > to just throw them away, but to either shred or incinerate them. Due to > the sheer size of the box, it is not practical for me to buy and use a home > shredder. Would anyone have a suggestion as to what is the best way to > destroy them? Aer there any services that do it inexpensively? Ask one of your friends with a fireplace to help out. Just remember to stire the ashes when done. Otherwise it's possible using IR sensing to read the ink on larger pieces of the paper. A bar-b-q pit is also a very good means. ____________________________________________________________________ | | | The most powerful passion in life is not love or hate, | | but the desire to edit somebody elses words. | | | | Sign in Ed Barsis' office | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

FCC sets new access rates - ISP's escape inter-state tariff - Congestion argument denied
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > X-within-URL: http://www.fcc.gov/ccb/access/fcc97158.html > Federal Communications Commission > navigation bar with links to FCC Homepage, Search, Commissioners, > Bureaus/Offices, and Finding Information > > HTML Format > > > FCC 97-158 > > First Report & Order In the Matter of > Access Charge Reform > Price Cap Performance Review for Local Exchange Carriers > Transport Rate Structure and Pricing > Usage of the Public Switched Network by Information Service and > Internet Access Providers > _________________________________________________________________ > > Text Version | WordPerfect Version | Acrobat Version | News Release | > Errata > > > > > Table of Contents > links to HTML files > > These files do not contain the changes specified in the 6/4/97 Errata! > > > TITLE PAGE > > I. Introduction 1 > A. Background 17 > > > 1. The Existing Rate System 17 > 2. Implicit Subsidies in the Existing System 28 > 3. The Telecommunications Act of 1996 32 > > > B. Access Charge Reform 35 > > > 1. Rationalizing the Rate Structure 36 > 2. Baseline Rate Level Reductions 42 > > > > II. Summary of Rate Structure Changes and Transitions 53 > A. Common Line Rate Structure Changes 54 > B. Other Rate Structure Changes 61 > > III. Rate Structure Modifications 67 > A. Common Line 67 > > > 1. Overview 67 > 2. Subscriber Line Charge 72 > 3. Carrier Common Line Charge 88 > 4. Common Line PCI Formula 106 > 5. Assessment of SLCs and PICCs on Derived Channels 111 > > > B. Local Switching 123 > > > 1. Non-Traffic Sensitive Charges 123 > 2. Traffic Sensitive Charges 136 > > > C. Transport 150 > > > 1. Entrance Facilities and Direct-Trunked Transport 152 > 2. Tandem-Switched Transport 158 > > > D. Transport Interconnection Charge (TIC) 210 > > > 1. Background 210 > 2. Discussion 212 > > > E. SS7 Signalling 244 > > > 1. Background 244 > 2. Discussion 252 > > > F. Impact of New Technologies 256 > > IV. Baseline Rate Levels 258 > A. Primary Reliance on a Market-Based Approach With A > Prescriptive Backdrop and the Adoption of Several Initial > Prescriptive Measures 258 > > > 1. Background 258 > 2. Discussion 262 > > > B. Prescriptive Approaches 285 > > > 1. Prescription of a New X-Factor 285 > 2. Rejection of Certain Prescriptive Approaches 287 > > > C. Equal Access Costs 299 > > > 1. Background 299 > 2. Discussion 302 > > > D. Correction of Improper Cost Allocations 315 > > > 1. Marketing Expenses 315 > 2. General Support Facilities 326 > > > > V. Access Reform For Incumbent Rate-of-Return Local Exchange Carriers > 329 > A. Background 329 > B. Discussion 330 > > VI. Other Issues 336 > A. Applicability of Part 69 to Unbundled Elements 336 > > > 1. Background 336 > 2. Discussion 337 > > > B. Treatment of Interstate Information Services 341 > > > 1. Background 341 > 2. Discussion 344 > > > C. Terminating Access 349 > > > 1. Price Cap Incumbent LECs 350 > 2. Non-Incumbent LECs 358 > 3. "Open End" Services 365 > > > D. Universal Service-Related Part 69 Changes 367 > > > 1. Background 368 > 2. Discussion 372 > > > E. Part 69 Allocation Rules 388 > > > 1. Background 388 > 2. Discussion 389 > > > F. Other Proposed Part 69 Changes 390 > > > 1. Background 390 > 2. Discussion 391 > > > > VII. Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking 397 > A. PICCs for Special Access Lines 397 > > > 1. Background 398 > 2. Proposal 403 > > > B. General Support Facilities Costs 407 > > > 1. Background 408 > 2. Proposal 412 > > > > VIII. Final Regulatory Flexibility Analysis 419 > > IX. Procedural Issues 441 > > X. Ordering Clauses 459 > > Appendix A List of Commenters > > Appendix B Comment Summary > > Appendix C Final Rules > > STATEMENTS > Commissioner Quello > Commissioner Ness > Commissioner Chong > > > > > View/Download single-file HTML version of Entire Report > > > > > Pagination of the documents contained in these files may not match > that of the Official Paper Version when viewed or printed using your > system. > > > > navigation bar with links to FCC Homepage, Search, > Commissioners, Bureaus/Offices, and Finding Information > > > last updated 6/9/97 > ____________________________________________________________________ | | | The most powerful passion in life is not love or hate, | | but the desire to edit somebody elses words. | | | | Sign in Ed Barsis' office | | | | _____ The Armadillo Group | | ,::////;::-. Austin, Tx. USA | | /:'///// ``::>/|/ http://www.ssz.com/ | | .', |||| `/( e\ | | -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- Jim Choate | | ravage(a)ssz.com | | 512-451-7087 | |____________________________________________________________________|

1 0

Happy New year, Don't Miss Out!
by MAILER-DAEMON＠toad.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I will pay you $20,000.00 if you can prove me wrong! Work one or both of my home business opportunities and you will make money. SIMPLE, PROVEN, EASY TO UNDERSTAND OPPORTUNITIES. Looking for 150 serious people who want to make money. Interested? If YES: call: 330-722-1813 This is a serious offer. No MLM United States Direct with National Manufacturer. Absolutly FREE Information will be provided ! Absolutly NO OBLIGATION to receive FREE info!

1 0

Re: cryptix java AES effort
by Ian Grigg 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Adam kindly forwarded the AES quest blurbs to interested and/or interesting groups. Some slight clarification is required in the detail of who and what. Adam said: > Systemics provides a BSD licensed (free for commercial and > non-commercial use) java crypto library called cryptix. A slight modification: Systemics provided, in the past tense. It was always the belief of those at Systemics at the time that selling crypto was extremely hard without contacts into big companies (in which case, you weren't selling crypto...). When Cryptix stabilised it was published as freeware with a BSD-style of license, with the hope that other people would pick it up and start to work with it. With the Java library this has happened. There is now a team of between 4 and 10 people, depending on how you count them, scattered across the globe, improving the core Cryptix code. Over the last year or so, we codified the notion of the independant group working around the library as the Cryptix Development Team. That is now spreading through the doco. ( There are a few issues such as copyright and the brand name, which are beyond the scope of this email. Whilst Systemics is not entirely passive in this area, it does not sell Cryptix code, although it might, and does, sell services such as improving Cryptix code. Also, those who work/have worked at Systemics are also part of the team. ) The AES quest is a Cryptix operation. I.e., Cryptix Development Team, and not Systemics. It is a completely unfunded (although sponsorship would be appreciated) and volunteer effort. Whilst the NIST people earn a salary, and most of the cryptographers are employed in this capacity as well, there is no especial interest in employing programmers here, as any rational company will simply wait until the winner is announced, sometime in the next millenium, and then employ an expert at $300 per hour to tell them all about it. Rationally or otherwise, we still need programmers to code up the algorithms and prepare them for submission to NIST. For many cryptographers, it is beyond their efficient capabilities to know much about the downstream discipline, so it makes sense for them to outsource the work to a team like Cryptix, especially as NIST has loaded up the submission requirements with 3 separate implementations. If you're thinking now's the time to branch into Java crypto, read the blurb and mail us. The rational part is that if you start now, you might be earning fat fees in a few years time. > http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/I.Brown/cryptix/aes/AES_crypt.html > http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/I.Brown/cryptix/aes/AES_prog.html -- iang systemics.com FP: 1189 4417 F202 5DBD 5DF3 4FCD 3685 FDDE on pgp.com

1 0