December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Cyphernomicon, and a section on Escrow and Reputations
by dsc＠swcp.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>I finished my first release, a megabyte-sized file done in MORE, a powerful >outline processor (which enabled me to maintain notes, make >cross-references, and generally manage such a huge writing project). I >released it last year, and put it in my anonymous ftp account at >ftp.netcom.com, in the directory /pub/tc/tcmay, as the file CP-FAQ. Netcom >is often very crowded, though. After several tries I was not able to get this. Has anyone made it available in an alternate location? Dar (list newbie) =========================================================== Dar Scott Home phone: +1 505 299 9497 Dar Scott Consulting Voice: +1 505 299 5790 <--- 8637 Horacio Place NE Email: darscott(a)aol.com Albuquerque, NM 87111 dsc(a)swcp.com Fax: +1 505 898 6525 http://www.swcp.com/~correspo/DSC/DarScott.html My preference for attached files are in this order: AOL, Mime, Binhex4, PGP, UUencode ===========================================================

3 2

Re: Breaking Legal News.... (fwd)
by Greg Broiles 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>The American legal system has spun out of control. I don't argue that she >should not have the right to sue...everybody does. But a judge can quickly >dismiss a case on a matter of law. According to the Mercury-News, the suit has been dismissed. <http://www.sjmercury.com/news/breaking/docs/016909.htm> -- Greg Broiles gbroiles(a)c2.net 510-986-8770 x 309 voice ** please note phone number has changed ** 510-986-8777 fax

1 0

Re: Shooting the taggers
by John Smith 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Here in Santa Cruz, graffiti spray-painted on the walls of businesses >is a >big, and growing, problem. And laws require the businesses to paint >over >>he grafitti, or otherwise render it invisible, in a quick and timely >manner. (The idea is that the grafitti is offensive to the >sensibilities of >others, or somesuch, and that it encourages rival gangs to counter >with >their own grafitti.) No, the idea is that the taggers do their thing in order to see the results of their work on display. Paint over the results promptly, and there is no point to tagging. >There's a solution for taggers: snipers. A punishment far out of proportion to the crime. It is a mistake to think that all crimes should be punished by the most violent means possible. Notice that most proponents have never raised children. They need to learn the importance of proportionality. "John ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

2 1

Re: A problem with anonymity
by terrell＠sam.neosoft.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>To: TCMAY(a)GOT.NET, CYPHERPUNKS(a)toad.com >Subject: Re: A problem with anonymity >From: monty.harder(a)famend.com (MONTY HARDER) > > > But if the escrow agent is anonymous, we simply recurse, moving now to >the question of whether anyone can trust the Anonymous Escrow Agency not >to take the money and run. > >TC> (I mention banks because, when you look at it closely, today's banks can >TC> quite easily claim that a customer made a withdrawal when he didn't. That >TC> they don't says more about the nature of persistent businesses than about >TC> any government oversight or security features. This is a side point, but it >TC> bears keeping in mind that the real world of banks and businesses, etc., is >TC> not fully secure, either. And yet it mostly works pretty well. The reasons >TC> for this are interesting to consider.) > > A bank has $$ invested in impressive-looking buildings, (so that >vanishing into the ether and setting up shop elsewhere is rather >difficult) and several officers whose TrueNames are registered with the >appropriate agencies, so that they may be sued if they pull this >crap. > > While individual stockholders might appreciate the anonymity (and >protection from legal action) of owning stock in a bank or escrow agency >(might just combine the functions, while we're at it), they demand >onymity of the officers with whom they entrust the keys to the >corporation. >Monster(a)FAmend.Com * > > The real secret is that for most banks the individual transaction is << than the total stream of transactions. Defaulting on a single transaction will show a profit that is miniscule compared to the over-all earnings at stake if the bank's credibility is jeopardized. When banks have gotten into trouble it is frequently when they allow one customer or one transaction to represent a significant share of their business. You have a high probability of being able to trust an escrowee with your $1 if you know he intends to collect commissions on holding $1million for others based on his "trusted" representation. Buford C. Terrell 1303 San Jacinto Street Professor of Law Houston, TX 77002 South Texas College of Law voice (713)646-1857 terrell(a)sam.neosoft.com fax (713)646-1766

1 0

my crypto rump session abstract
by Matt Blaze 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

(the one that david sternlight misinterpreted to mean that we had proven that clipper has no back doors): M. Blaze, J. Feigenbaum, F.T. Leighton, "Master Key Cryptosystems", Crypto '95 "rump session" abstract, August 1995. Available as: ftp://research.att.com/dist/mab/mkcs.ps -matt

1 0

When did he get traded to the Black Hawks?
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Anonymous wrote: > At 05:33 PM 8/22/97 -0400, you wrote: > >> Great Barrington, MA -- In a recent > >> pronouncement, television evangelist and > >> head of the Christian Coalition, Pat > >> Robertson, advocated death by stoning for > >> crypto enthusiasts. > I've never understood this dumb Christian overlooking of how the world > actually functions. You don't "stone" people to death anymore, > there's other ways to kill them. Second, this "Pat Robertson" is a > fascist. I'm a Frisbeetarian. I believe that, when you die, your soul goes up on the roof, and you can't get it down. Nonethemore, I take umbrage at much of the recent Christian-bashing taking place on the cypherpunks list. Bash Pat Robertson, 'make fun' of Jesus, but please, stop painting with the wide brush. If I claim to speak for the cypherpunks, then I would expect to be roundly booed and set upon by Mongers with long teeth and shot at by whoever May choose to do so. I expect the same for Pat Robertson when he speaks for Jesus. He's an asshole! However, the cypherpunks mailing list serves a purpose for giving us a forum to discuss and debate issues that are important to us, and the Christian faith does likewise for those who think evolution is a Satanist plot, and Jesus plays goalie for the Chicago Blackhawks. (Jesus Saves! {But Gretsky puts in the rebounds.}) > >> While Robertson viewed the Internet with > >> suspicion, on a more serious note, he > >> launched into a diatribe against those who > >> entertain the existence of uninhibited free > >> speech on the Internet. Uuuhhh...forget what I just said. Let's kill this fucker and anyone who tunes him in on "the day of the sun." > >> According to Robertson, the threat is so > >> serious that people who believe in free > >> speech should be put to death by stoning -- > >> according to "God's word." This sounds like a misrepresentation of Robertson's beliefs, by someone who has an axe to grind, but now that I've got the adrenaline flowing, I don't give a shit. Let's kill him! > Fuck him. God's word is fascism, hate, narrow-mindedness, and a Big > Brother State. He can take his bible and shove it up his ass. That costs extra... At least, in the places I frequent, it does. > Sorry, we own earth, and God doesn't exist. If God is Love, and Love is Blind, then Ray Charles must be God. > >> "He has given us the Earth. He also warned > >> us in the book of Matthew of the dangers of > >> corrupting forces such as the Internet which > >> can be used for evildoers: Why do people say things like this, without giving pointers to the relevant URL's? If I'm going to avoid sinful web sites, then I need to check them out first, so that I know what I am avoiding. Being the forgiving type, I would also feel obligated to keep checking these evil web sites out on a regular basis, to see if they have repented, yet. > First of all, this also proves Christians are incabable of making real > world arguments, because they rely so heavily on a 1000-page book > filled with lies. God (pardon the expression), but you have a negative attitude. There are many valuable things one can learn from studying the Bible. e.g. Q?: Who was the smallest person in the Bible? A!: The guard who fell asleep on his watch! Q?: Which stretches further, rubber or skin? A!: Skin. The Bible tells of a man who tied his ass to a tree, and walked over a mountain. > >> "'A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can > >> a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that > >> does not bear good fruit is cut down and > >> thrown into the fire. Therefore, by their > >> fruits you will know them. (Matthew 7:17-20)' So, if your brother has a boyfriend... > >> "And you see, there is only one Word, and > >> that is the Word of God: > Bullshit. I've been wondering what that word was. "Bullshit..." I like that word. Does that make me a Christian? > >> "'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word > >> was with God, and the Word was God. (John 1:1)'" Hey! I just typed 'God.' 'God.' Look! I did it again. Watch this... Bullshit! I'm starting to like this Christian religion thing. > Second off, cryptic responses aren't worth a shit in arguments. That's because you don't take the time to understand them. Remember, "Patience comes to those who wait." > >> "Can a demon appear as a slanty-eyed, > >> funny-looking computer hacker? Well, I've never actually *met* Bill Gates, but... > >> Of course > >> he can, or it can. Of course they can deceive > >> people. And if they can lead somebody away > >> from the true God, or away from Jesus > >> Christ, anyway it happens, it doesn't > >> matter, you will lose your salvation. It > >> doesn't matter how they get you. The > >> question is, did they get you, and under > >> what guise? Well, you have to consider the Support package before you really pass judgement. What kind of Jock strap are we talking about, here? > >> "This is man in rebellion against God, who > >> refuses to take God's Law. And God says, > >> 'My covenant says you won't do this. And if > >> I find anybody in Israel,'-- "which is his > >> pure nation" -- 'If I find anybody in > >> Israel that's doing this sort of thing, > >> then I want you to take him out and dispose > >> of him." > > That is fascism. Nazi fascism. Come on, you're overreacting. Everything is disposable these days. > >> "It's a clear violation of God's word. > >> Stone them." "Everybody must get stoned." - Bob Dylan > >> Skipp Porteous, Freedom Writer publisher, > >> commented: "As the founder and chairman of > >> the Christian Coalition -- a group > >> dedicated to becoming the most powerful > >> political force in America -- Robertson's > >> extreme ideas need to be taken seriously, > >> for they not only negate pluralism, but > >> condemn to death those who dare to believe > >> differently." How differently does one have to believe to just get "spanked?" (I'm not into hard-core.) > This speech of his outlines in entirety the Christian Agenda. > Enslaving, murder of those different, intolerance, fascism. Jesus! (pardon the expression) Do these people put out a magazine? Color glossies? Is there bondage involved? If so, I would be willing to convert. > If Christians try to stone anyone, they should be shot right away. Not if they pick out the seeds and stems, first. > Freedom-Thru-AtheismMonger > "Your god is DEAD!!! And no one cares!!! If there is a hell, I'll see > you there!!!!!" - Nine Inch Nails, "Heresy" I bought a futures contract on "Nine Inch Nails." If they are not "Eleven Inch Nails" by this time next week, I lose my ass. I know this post doesn't make much sense, but it's Friday night and I haven't got a date. Is anybody out there getting laid tonight? Could you send me pictures? I'm desperate. The posts to alt.boring have slowed to a crawl. I'm running out of Pop Tarts. Still no word from the Reader's Digest Sweepstakes. And the way this relates to cryptography is... ...uuuhhh...John Gilmore is a cocksucker! (Bet you thought this whole damn post was going to be off-topic, didn't you?)

1 0

alpha.c2.org nymserver source code
by ghio＠c2.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I have packaged up the source for the nymserver I run on alpha.c2.org, and written a brief description of how to install it. E-mail me if you want it.

1 0

The Dangers of Caribbean Data Havens
by tcmay＠got.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>From Bruce Sterling in "Islands in the Net" to various reports of data havens and Internet services being set up by actual people, there has been much speculation about using Caribbean islands for data havens. But the infrastructure has been lacking. Low-bandwidth inter-island links. And now yet another huge hurricane is bearing down on the Lesser Antilles, heading directly for Puerto Rico and Hispaniola (Haiti and Dominican Republic). "Outages" lasting days or weeks after these islands get torn up every few years will not go too well with international commerce. Some fixes may help: * higher-bandwidth connections, e.g., undersea fiber. * satellites as primary or secondary connections * more secure on-island facilities, designed to maintain contact with satellites or fibers even with a Force 4 hurricane direct hit. The "regulatory arbitrage" aspects still make using the Islands advantageous (though they can be buffeted by political storms as well as physical ones). At least two current or past Cypherpunks are living in the Islands and working on some schemes. Something to think about. Personally, I think a distributed system based on crypto is a more robust approach, the "Libertaria in Cyberspace" view I've talked about. --Tim May ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, tcmay(a)got.net 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Higher Power: 2^756839 | black markets, collapse of governments. "National borders are just speed bumps on the information superhighway."

3 2

Re: None
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

anon(a)anon.efga.org wrote: >> Great Barrington, MA -- In a recent >> pronouncement, television evangelist and >> head of the Christian Coalition, Pat >> Robertson, advocated death by stoning for >> crypto enthusiasts. AN> This post has moved me considerably. Some parts of his speech AN> requires a response that words could not adequately describe. Jim Bell has a solution for that <G> BellMonger

1 0

Re: e$: More fun with cash: Senate Bill 307
by John A. Limpert 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 01:41 PM 9/4/95 -0400, Robert Hettinga wrote: >Has anyone heard about this bill? Comments? This idea seems to get proposed every few years. In the past it has been shelved as soon as someone figures out the disaster that would be caused by the resultant decline in the value of the dollar. The U.S. Government has to be nice to foreigners that hold large quantities of dollars and treasury securities, even if it doesn't care about the political consequences at home. -- John A. Limpert johnl(a)Radix.Net

1 0