December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

somebody clue this person in please!
by HyperReal-Anon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Ken Williams <jkwilli2(a)unity.ncsu.edu> wrote: >i'm laughing too damned hard to do it myself. >In a message dated 11/30/98 10:15:50 AM EST, jkwilli2(a)unity.ncsu.edu writes: > >> Get Your Private, Free, Encrypted Email at http://www.nsa.gov > >I looked around there site and couldnt find anything about geting a e-mail >could you please be more specific. Why do you find this such a surprise? This is typical behavior for AOLholes. We've all tried for years to clue such lamers in, and all we've ever gotten in return are more "solicited" spam, and more unsolicited spam, and it's worse because they're no longer concentrated at one site.

1 0

New Brady Bill Implications
by Carol Anne Cypherpunk 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I'm watching Headline News, and they are reporting that "now", under new provisions in the Brady Bill, and 'instant' background check is being made. This even is for simple rifles and shotguns. Just think, soon there might be 'instant' background checks, even just to use simple 56 bit DES. Or somewhere lurking around in your browser code, a teeny tiny program that sends a cookie to the NSA, FBI, etc every time you use crypto. Who knows, it's probably there already. Or a realtime NCIS check to buy a copy of PGP! Wild! cab8 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.0 Comment: PGP 6.0 is the "The Living End". iQA/AwUBNmOomDiM2656VXArEQLQRQCgg3l0PO8DOzkj/7McAUI8gQSC03cAnRhk AybC39FkOKoV7ZQUvJcuFTT8 =9sxR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Member Internet Society - Certified Mining Co. Guide - Webmistress *********************************************************************** Carol Anne Braddock (cab8) carolann(a)censored.org 206.165.50.96 http://www.primenet.com/~carolab http://www.ozones.com/~drozone - The Cyberdoc *********************************************************************** Will lobby Congress for Food & Expenses!!!

6 8

Jim Bell Update
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forward No. 1 (11/30/98): Jim has been back in the Seattle/Tacoma jail for about a week & 1/2, after a stop-over in Oklahoma City. Not doing much, but is glad to be back because he likes the food better and he has things to do, unlike in Springfield. He doesn't know what the schedule is for his stay at this point, except that there is an attempt to impose more time to his sentence, which he says by the time they accomplish anything in court he will have fulfilled anyway. He requests once again that anyone who would like to help him research the names/addresses of people he thinks are involved in the surveillance efforts against him, to please contact him. His address again is: James Bell #26906086 Federal Detention Center P.O. Box 68976 Seattle WA 98168 ---------- Forward No. 2 (11/30/98): After spending several weeks in Oklahoma, then several more in Springfield, MO, a shrink interviewed Jim for a total of six hours, and said he could find nothing wrong that they could help with. After several more weeks in Springfield, it was back to Oklahoma, for a couple more weeks, and now he is finally back at Sea-Tac. He reports that the prosecutor is asking for 9 months for violation of parole, which would mean Jim might be released in 3 months. He is on Prozac and seems in pretty good spirits. Opinions seem unchanged. ----------

1 0

CJ Update
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forward (11/26/98): They moved CJ from Springfield on the 18th. He is in Oklahoma City awaiting movement supposedly next week. I talked with him and he sounded okay. He would like to receive copies of what has been written and posted about him. He doen't know where he is going. His lawyer should find out next week.

1 0

Process Serving Court Filing Searches
by Bill 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

http://www.select-document.com /////////////////////////////////////////////////// To be removed from future mailings, please send an email to mailto:4lemy@lycosmail.com?subject=remove ///////////////////////////////////////////////////

1 0

Build Your Own Cable TV Descrambler for less than $9.99.
by cabgirly333＠hotmail.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Cable Television Descrambler - Easy To Make ! Build your own Cable Television Descrambler with ONLY 7 parts from Radio Shack for UNDER $10.00. (don't hit reply, please check bottom of message for more references) --------------------- (Last minute update: "I've seen my letter and instructions sent by individuals that besides violating copy-right laws, are neither responding to the customer nor providing the original, complete set of plans and instructions. Please be advised you are risking your money and patience by ordering from individuals who know nothing regarding this tech/electrical matter" --Raul Mendez) Build your own Cable Television Descrambler with ONLY 7 parts from Radio Shack for UNDER $10.00. REQUIRED SUPPLIES: ================== 1 - Radio Shack mini-box (part #270-235) 1 - < watt resistor. 2.2k-2.4k ohm (part #271-1325) 1 - 75pf-100pf variable capacitor (special order) 2 - F61A chassis-type connectors (part #278-212) 12" - No. 12 solid copper wire 12" - RG59 coaxial cable Tools required: screwdriver & drill. Soldering gun & solder (optional). Get ALL the Premium Movie Channels, Pay per View and Adult Entertainment Channels for... FREE, FREE, FREE !!! Now, if I have your attention... let me tell you how this fantastic opportunity came about. My name is Raul. I live in New York City, New York. I have season tickets to our citys hockey team. I invited a friend of mine to one of the games this last October. He said, "Id love to go if you can have me back home by 10:00 p.m." I told him that some games run just past 10:00 p.m. and would he mind we stay if the game was close. His response was, "No, tonight is the Mike Tyson - Evander Holyfield boxing match and I have it on pay per view" I said, "do you mind if I watch the fight with you"? He said, "sure, no problem". So we go watch this great fight on cable pay per view and we are the only two guys at my friends house. After the fight (since it was so good) I offered to pay half of the cost for the fight. My friends answer was, "no, no, thats not necessary... I got the fight for FREE!". I said to him, "for free, dont those fights cost around $40.00 a pop?" He told me, "yes, they do, but I bought a cable descrambler box from an acquaintance of mine for $300.00". He further explained that this "little black box" gets ALL the pay per view events available! It also tunes in ALL the premium movie channels and ALL the adult entertainment channels. My response (without hesitation) was, "I gotta have one!" "$300.00, no problem where do I pay !!!" Im serious, I was excited. Lifetime premium movie channels, pay per view and adult entertainment all for a one-time fee of $300.00... no way!!! "No way" was right. The guy that sold my buddy the box was no where to be found. I was really disappointed. It was now time for desperate measures. I begged and pleaded with my friend until he agreed to let me take his box apart piece by piece to see how to make one for myself. Luckily it was very easy, if it wasnt simple I knew their was a slight chance it was not going back together so pretty. Now the rest is history... Ive got my own box which I built with my own two hands. Would you like to build one yourself ?!?! If so, would you pay $300.00. Maybe so, maybe not. Probably not, unless you saw one work first. But since that is not possible, I will sell you a complete set of instructions on how to build one yourself for a measly $9.99. However, at that price YOU MUST ALSO ENCLOSE A #10 SELF ADDRESSED STAMPED ENVELOPE WITH 55 CENTS POSTAGE AFFIXED. You might ask, is this some type of rip-off scam deal. The answer is NO! Everything has specific mechanics of how and why they do what they do. We are just used to flipping a switch or pushing a button or moving the mouse across our computer pads. It all happens because of a certain set of processes. The cable television descrambler is no different. However, for legal purposes I must add to this letter that this offer and set of instructions shall be void where prohibited by law and the assembling of parts necessary to make this "little jewel" work is for educational purposes only. To order a set of the instructions send $9.99 by cash, check or money order payable to: Raul Mendez Enterprises, 50 Lexington Av suite 209, New York city, NY 10010 I will mail your order out within 24 hours of receiving it. Further, I will give you a refund upon written request if you are unsatisfied for any reason. Happy Holidays !!! Sincerely, Raul Mendez P.S.: The use of this mini-box if you choose to go on and see if your creation works requires no alteration of your existing cable system. You simply screw it in, right behind your television. P.P.S.: Without the instructions its like figuring out how to set the clock on your VCR. With the instructions, you are guaranteed success.

1 0

NZ or LA in Y2K
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 07:54 PM 11/30/98 -3000, Igor Chudov @ home wrote: > >But objectively, there is a large category of people who are bored >with their current lifestyle and gleefully expect a "total breakdown" >of the society so that they could shoot live man sized targets instead >of boring paper targets. > >They are likely to be disappointed by Y2K, or so I expect. (again, >my expectation that social breakdown is not likely to happen does >not preclude me from reasonable preparations) When the power goes out, the rioting and looting starts in the cities. (This isn't New Zealand, baby, this is LA) When the rioters get bored, they'll get into cars. When they run out of gas, they'll stay where they are stranded as the gas pumps don't work. Some fine huntin' then, bubba. Mr. Moisin-Nagant

2 1

y2k+oil refineries
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

a disturbing post on the idea that maybe embedded systems in refineries are so "embedded" they can't even be reached/ isolated. also hugely ubiquitous.... ------- Forwarded Message > > Gary North's Y2K Links and Forums > > 1998-11-30 13:28:22 > Subject: > Fuel Production Plants > Comment: > Let's hope this informant is wrong. If you have counter-evidence, contact me > at P. O. Box 8000, Tyler, TX 75711. > > * * * * * * * * > > I have one very, very reliable source within that industry who tells me that > the oil refining industry can't cope with the task. I am told that the problem > of embedded systems can NOT be fixed EVER, no matter how much time were > allowed. WHY? Because the refineries themselves would have to be dismantled to > uncover these embedded systems. Essentially, the refineries would have to be > destroyed and rebuilt!!! These embedded systems are buried within enclosed > systems. Identifying, testing and replacing these systems is too impractical. > It is financially unsound to do so. The better option is to build new ones. > There is no time to do this with less than 400 days left and the time to build > a new refinery is 3 to 5 years. > > So, what does this mean? My sources, especially the most reliable source tell > me that it means that on January 1, 2000... the oil and gas refineries will > cease operations. These facilities also have converted their inventory > management control systems to small inventory levels so that inventory levels > are running about 1 to 2 days capacity. A few years ago, the industry averaged > a 1 to 6 month supply in storage tanks. Not so today. > > The results: By 1/5/2000 there will be no gasoline, no diesel fuel, no natural > gas, no heating oil, no fuel oil products at all. This means trains will have > no fuel. Trucks will have no fuel. Cars will have no fuel. Electric Power > Plants will have no oil for fuel, nor coal... because there will be no fuel to > power the vehicles to get it to them. So, there will be no electricity. And > you know the remaining domino schematic from that point.

1 0

I Got Mine
by Blanc 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I received my visit from the friendly IRS guys tonight, asking about CJ/Toto. It seems that they had a copy of two emails (which they took from his confiscated computer) with my name on them - one of them the one in which I chastized him for sending a threatening letter to Billg. According to the headers in the message which they showed to me, Toto forwarded my reply through remailer(a)replay.com, Anon-To: billg. They wanted to know about my associations with Toto (I still think of him by that name), of course, of which I had none except through email. In our conversation, I discovered things that I didn't know about Toto's situation: that he had sent threatening letters to the Mounties, and that he had threated to kill the judge trying Jim's case. This is why he will be held and tried in the local jail - because the potential victims (besides the Mounties) are in this area. (sigh) I'm afraid CJ really went over the edge here and backed himself up in a corner. I should have chastized him more severely and counseled him against rash acts of unkindness (not that I hold myself responsible for what he did, but he did pay attention to me). Kind of amusingly, one of them asked if CJ had ever asked me to join the Circle of Eunuchs! heh. I explained that it was Toto's Art imitating Life, creating stories about a revolutionary group based on the list discussions, and that I suspected he called it the Circle of Eunuchs because of the accusations ( by *some people* )that cpunks are ineffectual. We had a bit of discussion on a number of things, including the subject of free speech and how close one can get to it before being subject to arrest. I asked them what that crucial point was when this would happen, since there is no crime until action is actually taken. They said this would be when a direct threat is made and a specific name is mentioned. I referenced as an example the web site which some group put up containing a list of the names of abortion-performing doctors, mentioned in the press as a 'hit list'. They said that a web site with a list of names is not a problem. It is when statements are made about killing the individuals on the list that a person would have "crossed the line". One of the investigators also brought up the issue of the conflict between free speech vs life & liberty, of when one infringes on the other (as in threatening to take away someone's life). I remarked that one must always be prepared for the unexpected, and they made some points about taking threats seriously and the necessity of government agents looking out for their personal safety. I asked if cypherpunks would actually be subpoenaed to appear at CJ's trial. They said it depends on CJ: if he accepts a deal, he would likely get a reduced sentence, but if he takes them to trial then there could be quite a number of Cpunks called forth. I suggested if that happens we could all go out to dinner : ) and they thought this would be quite interesting. One of the investigators expressed a great interest in the cpunk dicussions and concepts; I described something of what the list is about and the flow of subscribers through it, and referred him to the archives, saying '94-'95 were some good years. I'm sure given a little time and several dinners we could convert him to the Dark Side. <g> .. Blanc

12 33

Fwd: FC: Gun groups take aim at new FBI database
by Declan McCullagh 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>Date: Tue, 01 Dec 1998 21:50:05 -0500 >To: politech(a)vorlon.mit.edu >From: Declan McCullagh <declan(a)well.com> >Subject: FC: Gun groups take aim at new FBI database >Sender: owner-politech(a)vorlon.mit.edu >X-URL: Politech is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/ > > > >http://www.wired.com/news/news/politics/story/16561.html > > Gun Groups Take Aim at Database > by Declan McCullagh (declan(a)wired.com) > > 4:45 p.m. 1.Dec.98.PST > WASHINGTON -- A controversial FBI > database that records gun buyers' > names, addresses, and Social Security > numbers is "a national surveillance > system" that violates the law. > > So says the National Rifle Association in a > motion for a preliminary injunction filed > Monday in US District Court. > > [...] > > > >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >POLITECH -- the moderated mailing list of politics and technology >To subscribe: send a message to majordomo(a)vorlon.mit.edu with this text: >subscribe politech >More information is at http://www.well.com/~declan/politech/ >-------------------------------------------------------------------------- >

3 3