December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Re: Can I do Pubkic Domain that -
by Bruce Balden 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Are you looking for access to the MISTY source code? It's still illegal to export it pending an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Even if that appeal fails, Congress will likely pass amended laws and/or the NSA/Commerce Dept will issue revised regulations on the same day that an unfavourable decision is announced. Those guys just never learn that not only is the barn door open, but that contents were never theirs to begin with. -----Original Message----- From: Nobuki Nakatuji <bd1011(a)hotmail.com> To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com <cypherpunks(a)toad.com> Date: Wednesday, December 17, 1997 6:22 PM Subject: Can I do Pubkic Domain that - >Can I do Pubkic Domain that I posted MISTY source code before? > > >______________________________________________________ >Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

5 7

Re: Can I do Pubkic Domain that -
by Nobuki Nakatuji 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

As for me, posted MISTY source code from Japan. Why is it improper if permission isn't taken from NSA/Commerce Dept ? > >Are you looking for access to the MISTY source code? It's still illegal to >export it pending an appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court. Even if that appeal >fails, Congress will likely pass amended laws and/or the NSA/Commerce Dept >will issue revised regulations on the same day that an unfavourable decision >is announced. > >Those guys just never learn that not only is the barn door open, but that >contents were never theirs to begin with. > >-----Original Message----- >From: Nobuki Nakatuji <bd1011(a)hotmail.com> >To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com <cypherpunks(a)toad.com> >Date: Wednesday, December 17, 1997 6:22 PM >Subject: Can I do Pubkic Domain that - > > >>Can I do Pubkic Domain that I posted MISTY source code before? >> >> >>______________________________________________________ >>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com > > ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

1 0

No Subject
by bureau42 Anonymous Remailer 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

When is Klintonkov running again? Why not?! He doesn't pay any attention to the other amendments!

3 4

Warez 2
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0

MISTY is patented International Patent
by Nobuki Nakatuji 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

MISTY is patented International Patent PCT/JP96/02154 by MITUBISHI Inc. A license is needed to "make, use or sell". ______________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

4 3

Warez 2
by Human Gus-Peter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0

Warez 3
by Human Gus-Peter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0

Warez 4
by Human Gus-Peter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0

Re: DSN authentication? (fwd)
by Lucky Green 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Some of you may remember my post to the list a while back wondering which, if any, authentication is taking place on commands sent to space crafts such as the Mars Rover. Well, here is the official answer: "We use a private network and keep the protocol specs secret, therefore we don't have to worry about a thing". -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 17 Dec 1997 12:14:35 -0800 (PST) From: Public Info <info(a)deepspace1.jpl.nasa.gov> To: Lucky Green <shamrock(a)netcom.com> Subject: Re: DSN authentication? Dear Mr. Green: I now have a response to your questions of authentication from one of our Deep Space Network Operations Managers, as follows: The commanding of any spacecraft is performed via a closed and secured network not accessed by the internet or the public. Direct connections provided by NASCOM connect the DSN sites to the project operations centers. There is no other branches nor interconnections available outside this circuit. Each project center determines the bit structure of each command sent, and not even the DSN sites that transmit the commands are aware of the format, protocols, etc. Command data is not stored at the sites to avoid sending commands inadvertently to the spacecraft. As a matter of fact, DSN policy is not to accept responsibility for manually sending commands even in case of a disaster. And, even within this closed circuit, command data is given the highest priority and treated as sensitive data and the command subsystems receiving and transmitting this data have been classified with the with the highest NASA security level. I hope this answers your question. Thank you for your interest. DSN Outreach Office >What authentication methods are employed to authenticate commands sent via >the DSN to space crafts and landers such as the Mars Lander? Please be >specific. Algorithm names, key lenghts, protocol specs, etc. > > > >-- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred > > "I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and > violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi

1 0

Warez 5
by Human Gus-Peter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

1 0