December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

security breached by NaughtyRobot
by Ellen Iwasaki 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

HELP! Can anyone tell me what this message is that I received in my mail today? Is it real? Should I do as it suggests? I have used the Internet once to purchase some books? Was my credit card number stolen in the process? How did this happen and how will it affect me? What should I do? PLEASE ADVISE ASAP! Thank you for your help Ellen Iwasaki Kumamoto, Japan > From: eiwasaki(a)gol.com > Date: Wed, 19 Feb 97 02:27 CST > Apparently-From: eiwasaki(a)gol.com > Apparently-To: eiwasaki(a)gol.com > Reply-to: eiwasaki(a)gol.com > Registered-mail-reply-requested-by: eiwasaki(a)gol.com > Sensitivity: PERSONAL-CONFIDENTIAL > Precedence: EMERGENCY > Priority: URGENT > Comment: Authenticated sender is <eiwasaki(a)gol.com> > Organization: NaughtyRobot > Subject: security breached by NaughtyRobot > > This message was sent to you by NaughtyRobot, an Internet spider that > crawls into your server through a tiny hole in the World Wide Web. > > NaughtyRobot exploits a security bug in HTTP and has visited your host > system to collect personal, private, and sensitive information. > > It has captured your Email and physical addresses, as well as your phone > and credit card numbers. To protect yourself against the misuse of this > information, do the following: > > 1. alert your server SysOp, > 2. contact your local police, > 3. disconnect your telephone, and > 4. report your credit cards as lost. > > Act at once. Remember: only YOU can prevent DATA fires. > > This has been a public service announcement from the makers of > NaughtyRobot -- CarJacking its way onto the Information SuperHighway. >

1 0

Re: "cypherpunks is dead..."
by Hayashi_Tsuyoshi 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Mr. Robert Hettinga, This is Tsuyoshi Hayashi, one of subscribers of the cypherpunks list, lives in Yokohama, Japan. I heard today's your voice on the cypherpunks list. I am little sad. I am almost ROM, read-only member... Although I have been hear for two and a half (wow..) years, I posted only three (or four...) messages. I am a bad boy. Sorry. > all Instead of it, I have gotten many many cripto-concerned info (such as PGP) which are worth reading (though they are very difficult for me, both technical and language ;-). Today I know about cryptography a little. I am working nearby the cryptographic field in Japan. So I DO want to say THANKS to all subscribers of the list and the owner-cypherpunks(a)toad.com, and the host machine named toad.com [140.174.2.1]. On Wed, 19 Feb 1997 15:37:08 -0500, Robert Hettinga said: >Anyway, I've learned all these things from many cypherpunks, some still Yes, me too! >Because of this list's effect on my life, I have been motivated to start >the Digital Commerce Society of Boston, to evangelize financial [..] I found your DCSB list out about a month ago. This list is also interesting for me. Thanks. >Next week, I go to FC97 in Anguilla because of the things I've learned on [..] I did want to go to FC97, but there is a long distance between Anguilla and Japan... I hope you will post the summary and/or topics of FC97 to the DCSB. :-) >[..] cypherpunks is not going to >die just because the address "cypherpunks(a)toad.com" ceases to exist. There Yah! >So. In a very real sense, today on cypherpunks is like any other day in the >life of a creosote bush. It's a big desert, folks. We're the only ones who # Sorry. Although there are both "creosote" and "bush" in # my English-Japanese dictionary, I could not understand # the meaning of "creosote bush". Please teach me it in # other easy words if you have a time. In English is OK. # In Japanese is the best. ;-) ==== Mr. Bob Hettinga and all, doumo arigatou gozaimashita! # And sorry for my poor English. In a "Roman Holiday", Audrey Hepburn said, "By all means, Roman..." Today I say, "By all means, Cypherpunks..." Best, - Tsuyoshi Hayashi <take(a)barrier-free.co.jp> - PGP public key: http://www.barrier-free.co.jp/take/pgpkey - (CF 27 34 5B 46 FA 2A 12 D2 4C E3 F7 2A 45 E0 22) - Barrier Free, Inc. (established on 25 Jan 1996)

1 0

Re: E-Gold: It had to happen
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text Sender: e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com Reply-To: Ian Grigg <iang(a)systemics.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: Bulk Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 10:53:31 +0100 From: Ian Grigg <iang(a)systemics.com> To: Multiple recipients of <e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com> Subject: Re: E-Gold: It had to happen some dead guy called gold dot wrote: > Yo, c-punks: Yo, dude > In the back of the March 97 issue of Liberty Magazine is an ad > for a gold backed e-money system called e-gold(tm). It appears > to be an on-line transaction system for paying other e-gold > account holders in e-money backed with gold or other precious > metals. Nice one, perhaps you could scan in the ad, seeing as my issue doesn't arrive until ... March. Your system "appears to be" an accounting system stuck on top of SSL. But I guess we don't get to find out, for sure, unless we commit lots of bucks... > See http://www.e-gold.com/ for more info. Yeah, nice pages, lots of homework done here folks, but you forgot to mention: who are you? where are you? when are you? will you be? -- iang iang(a)systemics.com ---------- The e$ lists are brought to you by: Intertrader Ltd - Commerce Solutions in the UK Visit <http://www.intertrader.com/> for details ... Where people, networks and money come together: Consult Hyperion http://www.hyperion.co.uk info(a)hyperion.co.uk Like e$? Help pay for it! See <http://www.shipwright.com/rah.html> Or, for e$/e$pam sponsorship, see <http://www.shipwright.com/rah/> Thanks to the e$ e$lves: Of Counsel: Vinnie Moscaritolo <mailto:vinnie@webstuff.apple.com> (Majordomo)^2: Rachel Willmer<mailto:rachel@intertrader.com> Commermeister: Anthony Templer <mailto:anthony@atanda.com> Interturge: Rodney Thayer <mailto:rodney@sabletech.com> --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "Never attribute to conspiracy what can be explained by stupidity." -- Jerry Pournelle The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/rah/ FC97: Anguilla, anyone? http://www.ai/fc97/

1 0

Re: European crypto export policy
by Asgaard 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Ulf Moeller wrote: > I wonder if someone whose Swedish is better than mine could summarize > the article? It is at http://www.et.se/datateknik/arkiv/97-02/5.html After signing the Wassenaar Arrangement, Sweden has written it's own ITAR and there is a subdepartment of the UD, it's Foreign Office/State Department, the ISP (Inspection of Strategic Products), that handles export requests, if need be with the help of the FRA, it's NSA. A representative of the ISP says that only a handful of EU member states are completely cleared by the Wassenaar statutes to be at the importing end of strong crypto: England, France, Holland, Sweden and Germany. Most other EU states could fail because it would be to upgrade them concerning their cryptologic resources. An example is given: the coming Swedish ID smartcard (using DES and 512 bit RSA) would theoretically need a OK from the ISP before being carried over the border to Denmark. A crypto exporter (obviously hardware) complains about harassing bureaucrazy even if Germany is the recipient. So much about that short article. In addition to Goran Axelsson, Sweden's representative in the EU's IT security body whom Ulf is mentioning in his post, Swedish crypto-politics is handled by this guy's boss (at least formally) at the UD, Magnus Faxen. And then there is the FRA (Forsvarets Radioanstalt), a body as secretive as the NSA. They don't officially take part in the discussions at all. Asgaard

1 0

Re: Constitution and a Right to Privacy
by Greg Broiles 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- At 11:56 PM 2/19/97 -0800, Dale Thorn wrote: >It's good if you don't read the L.A. Times. One of their lead editor- >ializers (whores), a professor at USC law school named Erwin >Chemerinsky, >writes in relation to this subject "The federal government is an inde- >pendent sovereign that cannot have its powers diminished by a state >government's actions." (exact quote, 2/7/97). Either that's a load of >BS doubletalk, or it's one of the more fascistic commentaries from the >Times, which is usually bad enough. Hey, don't forget to shoot the messenger. Chemerinsky's statement is a concise summary of at least the last 70 years of double jeopardy jurisprudence. The only thing that's unusual about the use of the "dual sovereign" doctrine against the cops who beat King was that it's usually used against ordinary citizens, not cops. Do you suppose it's possible that some of the other evil conspiracies you see lurking behind every bush are also just reflections of your own fears and misunderstanding? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 4.5 iQEVAgUBMwwPvf37pMWUJFlhAQEdtwf+PXP4jgU9kLlJ4VmI0tp5SUu2A7+4SIu1 fUB6nVCnJFroRAh1ds7lDonW8tjQw19/iOYyg0e1O+8cX4VlC0FhPJjD1nGwReWg z9rFjYpZ0J23Q/fGZwCziz4QF1QZwwqVoiQM+eur7cAKVCTHOZI8v7LEwtJZAeiU TUYS5YR7Vn6lkJ1XZQJv6Cjo1ZWQmldSQ4vue4qAk3DyHoaahbqa8Wkjk1CBmdpk jDmk9Uy3ejwZ54CZz1AQrGM4Cvpc9/rMtUHUuQttN7OU/YSUBTWZivD+TJoVQPAJ iFVcVbRiF6dnzpi7dOYt7E/ZXox1NsH0rgJ8JZuU0s3nuwgtW6qimA== =khMb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- Greg Broiles | US crypto export control policy in a nutshell: gbroiles(a)netbox.com | http://www.io.com/~gbroiles | Export jobs, not crypto. |

2 1

Re: E-Gold: It had to happen
by Robert Hettinga 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--- begin forwarded text Sender: e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com Reply-To: Ian Grigg <iang(a)systemics.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: Bulk Date: Thu, 20 Feb 1997 10:53:31 +0100 From: Ian Grigg <iang(a)systemics.com> To: Multiple recipients of <e$(a)thumper.vmeng.com> Subject: Re: E-Gold: It had to happen some dead guy called gold dot wrote: > Yo, c-punks: Yo, dude > In the back of the March 97 issue of Liberty Magazine is an ad > for a gold backed e-money system called e-gold(tm). It appears > to be an on-line transaction system for paying other e-gold > account holders in e-money backed with gold or other precious > metals. Nice one, perhaps you could scan in the ad, seeing as my issue doesn't arrive until ... March. Your system "appears to be" an accounting system stuck on top of SSL. But I guess we don't get to find out, for sure, unless we commit lots of bucks... > See http://www.e-gold.com/ for more info. Yeah, nice pages, lots of homework done here folks, but you forgot to mention: who are you? where are you? when are you? will you be? -- iang iang(a)systemics.com ---------- The e$ lists are brought to you by: Intertrader Ltd - Commerce Solutions in the UK Visit <http://www.intertrader.com/> for details ... Where people, networks and money come together: Consult Hyperion http://www.hyperion.co.uk info(a)hyperion.co.uk Like e$? Help pay for it! See <http://www.shipwright.com/rah.html> Or, for e$/e$pam sponsorship, see <http://www.shipwright.com/rah/> Thanks to the e$ e$lves: Of Counsel: Vinnie Moscaritolo <mailto:vinnie@webstuff.apple.com> (Majordomo)^2: Rachel Willmer<mailto:rachel@intertrader.com> Commermeister: Anthony Templer <mailto:anthony@atanda.com> Interturge: Rodney Thayer <mailto:rodney@sabletech.com> --- end forwarded text ----------------- Robert Hettinga (rah(a)shipwright.com) Philodox e$, 44 Farquhar Street, Boston, MA 02131 USA "Never attribute to conspiracy what can be explained by stupidity." -- Jerry Pournelle The e$ Home Page: http://www.shipwright.com/rah/ FC97: Anguilla, anyone? http://www.ai/fc97/

1 0

Re: Cryptanalysis
by Bill Stewart 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 11:21 AM 2/15/97 -0500, you wrote: >Was wondering if anyone could help me with short explainations on the >cryptanalysis of SKIPJACK and DES. If ya hit www.sauge.com/crypt you >might get a better idea of what i'm trying to accomplish. > >Vague explanations are OK. Dont want long drawn out explainations on >the implementation of an attack (source code, proofs, statistical >analysis and the like), just a short explaination of the attack. Cryptanalysis of DES is a 25-year ongoing academic exercise, with lots and lots of results. It's easy to attack it in 2**55 tries, because of symmetry, but that's a very large number :-) Differential cryptanalysis, discovered by Biham and Shamir, shows that the NSA probably did help the design process when working with IBM to turn IBM's 128-bit-key Lucifer system into DES, and certainly didn't weaken it. Linear cryptanalysis, discovered more recently, shaves some more bits off the strength if you have an extremely large amount of known plaintext. Brute-force attacks on DES (just try lots of keys until you win) used to be viewed as almost infeasible, but about 5-6 years ago there were a couple of designs for cracking machines that could do a 1-day crack for $30-50M, and then Wiener's design for a $1M, 3.5-hour cracking machine about 5 years ago. Gate arrays have gotten denser, faster, and cheaper since then, and if you want to crack a _lot_ of keys (e.g. you're the NSA) you can probably afford to burn ASICs to get even denser and faster. The slow part of the attack _had_ been key scheduling, but recent work by Peter Trei and others shows that you can do key scheduling very efficiently for the brute-force keysearch problem by picking keys in Gray Code order (since a one-bit change in key causes a simple change in key-schedule - it's totally useless for normal encryption/ decryption, but it's a big win for brute-force cracks.) There may be a distributed Internet crack using that approach, though DES is still very inefficient on general-purpose computers and works better on bit-twiddliing chips. SKIPJACK is a totally different game - the NSA keeps the algorithm secret, and the only semi-outsiders who've seen it were a group of 5 people including Dorothy Denning and Dave Maher who were allowed to do a study when the NSA were trying to foist Clipper onto us. They concluded that SKIPJACK was reasonably strong (in their interim report), which gave them good propaganda points, and never did the "final report" that was supposed to address the entire Clipper chip (where most of the technical weaknesses were) and the key-handling charade around it. I don't remember if Matt Blaze's spoofing attack on the Clipper chip came before or after their interim report - the checksums were too short so you could impersonate another chip under reasonably wide conditions. According to the data sheets for the Mykotronx Clipper Chip, SKIPJACK is a Feistel-structured cypher with N rounds (I think it was 16 or 32.) 80 bits is enough that if anybody can discover the algorithm, it's too long to brute force today but starts looking pretty vulnerable in 10-20 years, and of course the Feds would have your keys today, so they can wiretap you, without needing legal authorization, and you can probably bribe a Fed faster than you can brute-force the chip. # Thanks; Bill # Bill Stewart, +1-415-442-2215 stewarts(a)ix.netcom.com # You can get PGP outside the US at ftp.ox.ac.uk/pub/crypto/pgp # (If this is a mailing list, please Cc: me on replies. Thanks.)

1 0

Re: Constitution and a Right to Privacy
by Dale Thorn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Attila T. Hun wrote: > on or about 970219:0722 Dale Thorn <dthorn(a)gte.net> said: > +Simple, but.... In a right to jury trial of peers, are the peers the > +peers of the defendant or the peers of the victim? Both the Rodney > +King officers and the O.J. cases were perfect examples of how, when you > +switch the peer groups, you reverse the decisions. > you trying to be some kind of trouble maker? please remember that > *all* the fairweather dogooder liberals have been telling us for > years that everyone is equal. yeah, right! > therefore, juries are obviously color blind, and not dazzled by > attorneys calling up racism. yeah, right! It just makes me a little nervous to see jurors getting so personally involved that they come out of the box with a clenched fist as a (I suppose) victory salute. I didn't care to watch the charade in Santa Monica recently, but I doubt it was much better. > as to Powell, he is/was an animal who should have been put away > permanently. I watched most of the first trial live in '92, since I wasn't working that year. My impressions at the time went along with the presentation, which was fair to the officers. It was stated by Koon and one of the other officers as much as a year later, when many cities across the U.S. had been using the King video for training for several months to a year, "The LAPD has not to this date provided their officers with new tools and techniques to handle this kind of situation without a repeat of the same" (quote approximate). Of course, if you're willing to consider an alternative scenario, one which would appeal primarily to "conspiracy buffs" and the like, you might recall that L.A. was getting ready to put in a new freeway from the airport across the very line where the most fires were (6,000-plus fires, so extensive that the big jets couldn't fly over to LAX), and I think the outcome was to save them a lot of work, a windfall as it were. > Koon was an officer's officer (personal experience) and was in > the wrong place at the wrong time, not willing to step in. Koon lost > 24 years of service without a mark, his pension, and all his benefits > with 5 or 6 kids at home --and they had to go into hiding until > found by the liberal press again and again who obviously felt the > family should be punished as well. we wont even bother with the > issues of double jeopardy when they pull a federal civil rights > trial on all of them after the state court cleared everyone except > Powell who they hung on. they had a clear right to try Powell, > noone else. It's good if you don't read the L.A. Times. One of their lead editor- ializers (whores), a professor at USC law school named Erwin Chemerinsky, writes in relation to this subject "The federal government is an inde- pendent sovereign that cannot have its powers diminished by a state government's actions." (exact quote, 2/7/97). Either that's a load of BS doubletalk, or it's one of the more fascistic commentaries from the Times, which is usually bad enough. BTW, the Times printed a large picture (first time I've ever seen) of the chairman, someone named Schlossberg, and I think it's spelled slightly different than the one who married Caroline Kennedy. Anyway, this guy could be Michael Eisner's twin brother. Two bozos if I ever saw 'em, goofy-looking dudes, which would explain much about their newspaper editorial policy. > and the video played for evidence missed the first 90 seconds when a > very large animal (Rodney King can be described no other way) came > out of the car, dancing the jig, and went after Powell. by the time > the prosecutors, particularly the Feds, were through itimidating the > witnesses, nobody told the truth. The suppression of evidence that worked in the police officers' 2nd trial has apparently become the precedent for a whole lot of trials. The feds are sweating hard on this OKC bombing thing - latest is that the initial witnesses seeing McVeigh here or there have admitted to contradictory descriptions they've given before. Note that there was some jury tampering (IMO, and others too) in the grand jury proceeding in OKC; also note the flimsy excuse for throwing out the grand jury in the Simpson case, since they weren't going to indict Simpson. I didn't even read close on the De La Beckwith case, where the feds finally nailed him after 20-plus years of trying, but maybe there's something on the internet.... > Rodney King had been busted for public intoxication, controlled > substances, and disorder enough times that he was well recognized > for what he was --and easily identified. Let anyone say whatever they want to about cops, but I'm glad it's not me out there facing 220-lb guys on dust. I heard first hand from one who shot a guy twice, and he just kept coming. If a .38 won't stop 'em, maybe that's where the big dogs come in handy. It would've been interesting if the King video had a minute or so with a couple of K-9's... > in the spooks, we called Powell's actions "the red mask" --once you > start staring the beast in the eye, you are so wired on there is no > stopping until your opponent is jello. 'shocktroops' or > 'Stossentruppen' should never be used in civilian police forces, > except possibily on SWAT teams, not an average street cop. When I went into the Army for combat training, I stood 5-10 and weighed 120 lbs. I weighed 130 when I came out. I guess I could have gone on patrol looking for Charlie, and maybe kept alive, if I didn't have to take on some well-fed crazies whose lives were turning to shit because of their enormous stupidity. In any case, I couldn't go out on the street in L.A. and face guys like King, so I lean toward the cops as much as I can. BTW (and speaking of stupidity), the Christopher Commission named 44 or 45 cops out of the LAPD's 8,000-plus as problem officers, and two(!) of the 45 went to the Simpson home the night/morning of the murders. > and why did we have the trial in the first place? simply because the > LA Times and KABC decided there was going to be a trial. I dont > know whether to chalk it off to their bleeding heart liberals, or > just the usual greed for money to be made on high profile news. > or is it just more of the usual politically correct beat down of > the oppressive whiteface? Big Money, Big Fame, Big Fortune. Look at Dan Rather, Robert McNeil, Bill Moyers, and others who profited handsomely from their on-the- scene experience in the JFK killing. Remember Netanyahu, who spent all those hours on the telly during the Gulf War, playing the role of the ultra-conservative Israeli leader who could step right in and take command in a crisis? Well, he did, and have you seen any recent pictures of him? Even when he's with Yessir Yurafart, he's beaming broadly, like the cat that just ate the canary. Big, big money. > it is sometimes difficult to defend the LA Police department when > you knew Daryll Gates and his predecessor, "Big Ed" Davis. Both of > them are cowboys; Big Ed is now a state senator from the far west > Valley, what was horse country when I lived there. they had a job > to do, and LA is a mean place. the city itself is 2/3 poverty, half > of that extreme ghetto and barrio problems. > Big Ed is the man who proposed the fitting ending to airline > hijackings, and set up his display in plain sight: in front of > the American Airlines terminal building 4 at LAX before LAX was > double decked. > Big Ed parked a 40 ft flat bed trailer out there with a judge's > bench at one end and a gallows at the other end with the jury box > and dock in between. yes, sir, justice by the hijackers' peers; > take the next 12 citizens coming out the doors. > perfect and swift justice on someone who has no defense for his > actions. [heh heh] The people of L.A. really liked Gates, because he kept the peace. And they liked (Uncle) Tom Bradley just as well, since he kept the city really clean. No trash on the streets, no dirt, all the beautiful shrubs lining the freeways well-watered - you ought to see Hollywood since they started putting in the "subway" under Mayor Riordan. Anyone with any sense of pride at all would be aghast at what's happened. Streets caving in, wooden planks covering big holes on lots of streets that you have to drive over, it's a mess. Even a lot of the old stars on the Walk of Fame were badly damaged. Riordan must be a Communist, or Mafia or something. Funny that when he ran for mayor, his huge billboards all over town had his name in big letters, and the next-to-last letter (a) was replaced with a large red star, looking exactly like the ones they used under Mao. [remainder snipped]

1 0

Re: [CRYPTO] Dale Thorn Conspiracy Theory
by dlv＠bwalk.dm.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

(When I got back from WashDC, there were close to 300 new e-mails, and I'm still digging through the old ones.) Dale Thorn <dthorn(a)gte.net> writes: > Toto wrote: > > Dale Thorn wrote: > > > Igor Chudov @ home wrote: > > > > Take no offense, but why nobody thought about an obviously more likely > > > > conclusion: that it is Dr. Vulis who was, say, hired by Detweiler to > > > > destroy cypherpunks. I personally find the above unlikely, but at least > > > > more likely than all other suggestions (which I think are an example > > > > of the delusion of grandeur). Is LD on this mailing list? Someone should invite him. > OTOH, I had an instant crush on Zoe Baird. It broke my heart when > those heartless bastards in the Senate didn't confirm her. You just > can tell when a babe like that can't get in, that the politicians > love the money better than the women. Must be a bunch of homosexuals. I think Kimba Wood is a fine judge. > Fruit of the Loom was one of the first undie mfrs. to go offshore, > possibly Taiwan, possibly to the Reds subcontracting off the island. > You realize that Chiang Kai-Shek(sp?) was either the first or 2nd > richest man in the world during and after WWII? Running guns, drugs, > and boxer shorts for the CIA/FOTL company. Did you know that did wife was Russian? --- Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM Brighton Beach Boardwalk BBS, Forest Hills, N.Y.: +1-718-261-2013, 14.4Kbps

1 0

Re: All Hail Emperor Lewis! (was: Re: status: shoppingplanet jan 20
by Dale Thorn 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Toto wrote: > Dr.Dimitri Vulis KOTM wrote: > > These working examples also prove the other point I have found myself > > having to repeat... i.e. that anyone who posts to USENET news is trivially > > ``cullable'', and that E-mail spammers can have all of the E-mail addresses > > they could ever hope to use any day of the week. > Did you notice that when the 'censorship experiment' on the CypherPunks > list was abandoned, that Greg Broiles called for the list to be 'killed'? > Did you notice that when he was ignored, that he then changed his > postition to suggest that UseNet was the proper forum for continuing > the list? Life is too complicated, ya' know? I just wanna know who is this PATTI SHOCK <shock(a)nevada.edu> person, who's allegedly calling for a moderation of some forum on Usenet. The way I see it, if she's a real babe, somebody should fix her up with some censored material just to keep her happy. Then just let some really mean, dirty material through once a month or so, just so she knows the process is working, and protecting her from all sorts of hideous stuff. OTOH, if she's a Chelsea Clinton look-alike, why bother?

1 0