December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Mitnick wants cyphertext; gov't wants keys
by Lazlo Toth 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

>http://www.wired.com/news/print_version/politics/story/14855.html > >Wired News: >Hacker Can't Get Access >By Arik Hesseldahl > >8:35pm 4.Sep.98.PDT > >The epic legal wrangling in the Kevin Mitnick case took a new turn last >week when the accused hacker lost an appeal to access certain encrypted >data that his attorneys say could help him. >The data, seized by the FBI from Mitnick's computer when he was arrested in >1995, could contain evidence that could prove him innocent of some of the >charges against him, according to his defense. >In its encrypted form, the data is useless to prosecutors, who may have >tried to decode it and failed, said Donald C. Randolph, the Santa Monica, >California, attorney defending Mitnick. >.... >"We told the judge that giving him access to those files was like giving >someone access to a locked safe that might contain a gun," Painter said. >"[Mitnick's attorneys] claimed in court that the data might contain >exculpatory evidence but offered no further explanation." >Greg Vincent, Randolph's associate on the case, said that under federal >rules, Mitnick should be given access to all the evidence against him, and >that by denying such access, the government is opening itself up to losing >an appeal should Mitnick be convicted. >Vincent also said the government was willing to give access to the >encrypted files, provided that Mitnick hand over the password. This, said >Vincent, would violate Mitnick's Fifth Amendment rights against >self-incrimination. >Painter confirmed that the files had not been decrypted by the government.

2 1

Spelling error...
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, It's clathrate, not calthrate... Sorry. ____________________________________________________________________ The seeker is a finder. Ancient Persian Proverb The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

usa-v-cej-wc.htm (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Notice: mucho text deleted. Forwarded message: > X-within-URL: http://jya.com/usa-v-cej-wc.htm > criminal threats to kill, injure, obstruct, impede, threaten and > intimidate IRS > and other Government employees. I have also conducted numerous > investigations involving the use of computers and the Internet. Since > Western District of Washington. In the investigation of Mr. Bell, it > was discovered that he had posted a plan (titled "Assassination > Politics") on the Internet, offering users of the Internet a method > for anonymously funding the assassinations of IRS and other Government > Internet group known as the "Cypherpunks." During the investigation of This guy has experience with the Internet and doesn't know the difference between a group and a mailing list, what a maroon. > Bell I noted that Bell exchanged both private and public e-mail > messages with an unidentified person using the name "Toto." Implying Bell was under surveillance. > residence. Shortly thereafter, a member of the Cypherpunks group > stated via the Internet that he had obtained a copy of the warrant and > return, and publicly posted them on the Internet. And the point is? > Bell was arrested and charged with Corruptly Obstructing and Impeding So I can non-corruptly obstruct and impede? > 4. On June 23, 1997, an anonymous message was posted to the > Cypherpunks Internet mailing list. [A "mailing list" consists of the Well, finaly got the terms right. > 5. Based on my training and experience, I know that "Bot" is a slang > term for an automated computer program. I also know that "e$" and > "eCa$h" are slang terms for electronic or digital cash, which was a ... > maker or indorser [as written]. [By analogy, digital cash is like a > digital "poker chip" issued by a particular casino.] Oh well, I knew he couldn't keep it straight. > 6. On September 4, 1997, a second message involving "Dead Lucky" was > anonymously posted to the Cypherpunks group. This message stated in This guy keeps using 'group' instead of 'mailing list', there is the potential implication of conspiracy here...I wouldn't be surprised if just about all of us weren't under surveillance at this point. > 8. On December 9, 1997, an anonymous message was posted to the > Cypherpunks Internet mail group with the subject listed as "Encrypted > InterNet DEATH THREAT!!! / ATTN: Ninth District Judges / PASSWORD: > sog"[.] The body of the message was encrypted with the publicly > available encryption software PGP, and was initially unreadable. Using > PGP software and the password shown in the subject line of the > message, I was able to decrypt the message, which contained a > rambling, five-page statement, including the following: > I can also be tied into Jim Bell's Worldwide Conspiracy to > assassinate government authorities, through my implementation of an > Assassination Bot ..." See I told you there was a conspiracy buried in there somewhere! > 9. I noted that this message contained a PGP digital signature. From > my training and experience, I am aware that this digital signature is > used as a way to authenticate digital documents to make sure that they > are authored by the purported author and that no one has tampered with > them. When I checked the signature using only PGP software, the PGP > program was unable to identify it. > Only July 1, 1998, Royal Canadian > Mounted Police (RCMP) Investigator Steve Foster provided me with a PGP > "Secret Key Ring" which he stated he had obtained from a computer > which Canadian Customs authorities had seized from an individual by > the name of CARL EDWARD JOHNSON. [A "secret key ring" is a > user-generated code which allows for the encryption (and later > authentication) of computer-generated documents.] When I checked the > digital signature on the Internet death threat using the PGP software > and JOHNSON'S secret key ring, the computer identified the signature > as one of the signature keys stored in JOHNSON'S computer. Because > both the "private" and "public" portions of the "key" were stored on > JOHNSON'S computer, the message can be authenticated as having been > generated by the person who possessed this "secret key" and knew the > correct password. In other words, only the person possessing the > secret key found on JOHNSON'S computer could have generated the "death > threat" message. > 10. I have also spoken by phone with Special Agent Jeremy Sheridan of > the United States Secret Service. Sheridan told me that on July 31, > 1998, he located and interviewed Carl JOHNSON at 1800 West Magee, in > Tucson, Arizona. The address belongs to a Linda Reed, who, according > to Canadian police authorities, is a friend of JOHNSON'S. During this > interview JOHNSON admitted that he often wrote on the Internet and > among the names he used were Toto, C.J. Parker, and TruthMonger. > Johnson also stated that he had been using the Internet account of > Linda Reed. Sheridan showed JOHNSON a decrypted copy of the December > 9, 1997 Internet message entitled "Encrypted InterNet DEATH THREAT!!! > / ATTN: Ninth district Court Judges / PASSWORD: sog." JOHNSON > acknowledge that he wrote it. JOHNSON also stated that he had > significant psychological problems. Probably not a wise move, don't know about psychological problems but it certainly demonstrates a lack of intelligence. > bomb that was discovered in the basement of the Estevan courthouse on > June 3, 1998. Block advised me that Carl JOHNSON has been formally > charged with placing the bomb and that a warrant for his arrest has > been issued in Canada. Block advised me that he believes that JOHNSON > fled to the United States after placing the bomb in the Estevan > courthouse. That's impressive if true. > 15. On June 10, 1998, an anonymous message was posted to the > Cypherpunks Internet group. In the message, it is stated that the > bomber "placed the bomb before embarking on a middle-leg of the So that's why he came to Austin? ____________________________________________________________________ The seeker is a finder. Ancient Persian Proverb The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

3 2

Movie/Research Research
by WGKOPP＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, I'm a screenwriter in Los Angeles and I'm currently working on a psychological thriller. I'm trying to research how a particular thing could be done, and I cannot seem to find precisely what I'm looking for. You are surely highly learned individual, and I wonder if I could pick your brains for a moment. Here is the situation I need help with:- The "villians" are charging people $15 (from their credit card - or another source) to download or "watch" a video clip of highly illicit material, from a specific website. Our "protagonist" has to stop these "video's" and the people behind them, but, they cannot seem to trace them, or where the funds are going. How can this be done? How can we realistically make it so that origins and/or location & authors of the website are untraceable. Also, that the funds are untraceable. The only way our protagonist can find the villains, is by revealing a terrible secret from his past, something he's tried desperately to forget and put behind him. He eventually does catch the villains, but not electronically. He catches them, by reliving his painful past. Do you have any idea's? If so, I'd be most grateful if you could share them with me. Once the screenplay is completed and hopefully sold, I'm sure the very least I could offer is a film credit. Yours, Wayne Kopping

1 0

internet monitoring, UK
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

------- Forwarded Message From: "ama-gi ISPI" <offshore(a)email.msn.com> To: <Undisclosed.Recipients(a)majordomo.pobox.com> Subject: IP: ISPI Clips 4.25:UK Police May Soon Tap Your Email & Internet Use At Will Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 01:16:50 -0700 ISPI Clips 4.25:UK Police May Soon Tap Your Email & Internet Use At Will News & Info from the Institute for the Study of Privacy Issues (ISPI) Tuesday September 8, 1998 ISPI4Privacy(a)ama-gi.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This From: The Independent Network, Monday September 7, 1998 http://www.independent.co.uk The PC in your mailbox: The police may soon be allowed to read your email and check your Internet use at will. http://www.independent.co.uk/net/980907ne/index.html By Paul Lavin When you drop an envelope in a red pillar-box, you walk away confident that your mail will not be read by anyone except the addressee. However, when you send an email, it might be wise to reflect on the differences. According to the organisation Internet Freedom, an agreement being negotiated between the UK's internet service providers (ISPs) and the police will open the email of the UK's eight million Internet users to scrutiny without debate in Parliament or oversight by the courts or the Home Secretary. British police are said to be close to reaching an agreement with ISPs that will enable them to monitor customers' emails and web usage logs. Chris Ellison of Internet Freedom, says: "Following a series of meetings between the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) and Internet industry representatives, we understand that both groups have stated a willingness to reach a 'memorandum of understanding' about implementing police access to private data held by ISPs." According to David Kennedy, chairman of the Internet Service Providers Association, that is a serious overstatement of the discussions. However, he admits that the UK's ISPs are trying to avoid being flooded by court orders or having the police cart off critical servers for evidence. He says: "We are talking to law enforcement representatives to find a way to work with them within the legal framework that exists. All members of our association take the view that emails are private." As with the understanding between the Metropolitan Police and the ISPs over "banned" Usenet newsgroups and the closing down of web sites that may breach the law, the significance of such an agreement is that any such police activity may not be subjected to judicial review or legal constraint. Detective Chief Superintendent Keith Ackerman, chairman of the ACPO's computing crimes sub-committee, says: "We want to ensure the criminal doesn't take best advantage of the Internet, without requiring the Government to use the sledgehammer of regulation. However, we are not looking for the ability to go on fishing expeditions." The ISPs know that they are stuck in the middle, according to Keith Mitchell, chairman of Linx, a partnership of large ISPs. He says: "To divulge private email even under duress would be commercial suicide for an ISP. In some circumstances it would constitute a crime." Nonetheless, mistakes happen and there are well-known cases where the police have been persuasive. Mitchell says: "The current laws do not adequately protect ISPs or private individuals. We will be active in seeking responsive changes from Parliament." While there are undoubtedly individuals who use the Internet's email and worldwide web for nefarious purposes, the vast majority of people who use email and the web for personal and business communications have an expectation of privacy. And law-abiding citizens who wholeheartedly support the goals of law enforcement agencies may nevertheless feel uneasy about giving them carte blanche over email. America Online has been quite vocal in its opposition to opening the doors to the police short of a court order. Many ISPs agree. Julie Hatch, marketing communications director of Easynet, says:"We do not allow anyone to access our customers' email without a court order. "It makes no difference if it is an estranged wife or a suspicious business partner or anyone else, we would not divulge a subscriber's private email unless we were presented with a court order. This is in accordance with our terms and conditions. "Our business is also subject to restrictions imposed by the Data Protection Act (DPA), and in any situation we would certainly abide by those rules. So unless a subscriber's actions are illegal, you can say that email is confidential." The DPA provides scanty protection to email users, however. While the Act has aspects that protect the quality and use of information held in computer systems, disclosure can be afforded by a compliant ISP by simply including appropriate language in the small print of their terms and conditions. Data may be revealed to law enforcement officials as long as the subscriber is notified. Easynet's assurances highlight the differences between ISPs that are classified as telecoms providers, protected from feeling the long arm of the law by a regulatory framework, and those that are merely private businesses unaccountable to anyone but their owners and governed solely by their contracts with subscribers. As well as Easynet, UK ISPs that are regulated as telecoms providers include BT Internet and Demon, which is now part of Scottish Telecom. Smaller ISPs are more vulnerable to the persuasive demands of the police.They have no legally protected right of privacy and any redress for email disclosure would only be for breach of contract. Furthermore, most ISPs now include in their terms and conditions a requirement that the subscriber bear the expense of any legal costs resulting from their use of the service. This could lead to a complaining subscriber having to bear the costs of both sides of a lawsuit against an ISP even if they won. The most serious aspect of this potential agreement between the police and ISPS is, according to critics, the absence of legal safeguards. In order to tap telephones, the police need the permission of the Home Secretary and must justify violating the privacy of a suspect. It is not clear from the law whether tapping a telephone and tapping into an email exchange are the same thing. Chris Ellison says: "This is what is so dangerous about the new culture of private regulation and moral responsibility. ISPs now operate in a moral climate which insists on limitations for freedom of speech. Any material that causes offence - especially to children and ethnic minorities - is regularly removed. ISPs have now embraced this self-censorship credo and are willing to set themselves up as moral arbiters of internet content, filtering out anything that they feel may be illegal." Without public debate or scrutiny by Parliament, the police are likely to gain, as Liz Parratt from the organisation Liberty puts it, "a snoopers' charter for the Internet". Ordinary users will have little legal protection or redress against police monitoring of their communications. This trend could render the Internet less private and more regulated than any other communications medium. "If nothing else, these discussions have demonstrated what self-regulation really means: ISPs undertaking the role of publicly unaccountable instruments of law enforcement." Email is not like a letter in an envelope; it is more like a postcard. Just as you would not put some messages on a postcard, you should think before you use email for your most private communications. While the legality and desirability of the any agreement between ACPO and the ISPs is highly debatable, anyone interested in maintaining their privacy on the Internet must take responsibility for their own actions. The agreement between ACPO and ISPs will be the subject of three seminars: 22 September in Edinburgh, 8 October in London and 27 October in Manchester. Additional details can be found at http://www.linx.net/misc/acposeminar.html . - --------------------------------NOTICE:------------------------------ ISPI Clips are news & opinion articles on privacy issues from all points of view; they are clipped from local, national and international newspapers, journals and magazines, etc. Inclusion as an ISPI Clip does not necessarily reflect an endorsement of the content or opinion by ISPI. In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed free without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. - --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISPI Clips is a FREE e-mail service from the "Institute for the Study of Privacy Issues" (ISPI). To receive "ISPI Clips" on a daily bases (approx. 4 - 8 clips per day) send the following message "Please enter [Your Name] into the ISPI Clips list: [Your e-mail address]" to: ISPIClips(a)ama-gi.com . The Institute for the Study of Privacy Issues (ISPI) is a small contributor-funded organization based in Victoria, British Columbia (Canada). ISPI operates on a not-for-profit basis, accepts no government funding and takes a global perspective. ISPI's mandate is to conduct & promote interdisciplinary research into electronic, personal and financial privacy with a view toward helping ordinary people understand the degree of privacy they have with respect to government, industry and each other and to likewise inform them about techniques to enhance their privacy. But, none of this can be accomplished without your kind and generous financial support. If you value in the ISPI Clips service or if you are concerned about the erosion of your privacy in general, won't you please help us continue this important work by becoming an "ISPI Clips Supporter" or by taking out an institute Membership? We gratefully accept all contributions: Less than $60 ISPI Clips Supporter $60 - $99 Primary ISPI Membership (1 year) $100 - $300 Senior ISPI Membership (2 years) More than $300 Executive Council Membership (life) Your ISPI "membership" contribution entitles you to receive "The ISPI Privacy Reporter" (our bi-monthly 12 page hard-copy newsletter in multi-contributor format) for the duration of your membership. For a contribution form with postal instructions please send the following message "ISPI Contribution Form" to ISPI4Privacy(a)ama-gi.com . We maintain a strict privacy policy. Any information you divulge to ISPI is kept in strict confidence. It will not be sold, lent or given away to any third party. ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer ********************************************** ------- End of Forwarded Message

1 0

Movie/Research Research (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > From: WGKOPP(a)aol.com > Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 21:33:54 EDT > Subject: Movie/Research Research > The "villians" are charging people $15 (from their credit card - or another > source) to download or "watch" a video clip of highly illicit material, from > a specific website. > Our "protagonist" has to stop these "video's" and the people behind them, but, > they cannot seem to trace them, or where the funds are going. > > How can this be done? How can we realistically make it so that origins and/or > location & authors of the website are untraceable. Also, that the funds are > untraceable. You'd need to use something like an eternity server or a data haven. These allow one to obtain information from an unknown 3rd party based on a distributed network of servers and search engines. All transactions of e$ would need to go through an anonymous remailer of some sort that interfaced to a suitable bank handlding EFT's via the Internet. The web surfing could be implimented via a CROWDS style mechanism. ____________________________________________________________________ The seeker is a finder. Ancient Persian Proverb The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

(fwd) ppdd - encrypted filesystem - kernel patch and support progs.
by demona＠demona.doldrums.dyn.ml.org 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

-- forwarded message -- Path: nntp.net-link.net!ptdnetP!newsgate.ptd.net!newsfeed.fast.net!howland.erols.net!newsfeed1.telenordia.se!newsfeed1.funet.fi!news.helsinki.fi!not-for-mail From: Allan Latham <alatham(a)ibm.net> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.announce Subject: ppdd - encrypted filesystem - kernel patch and support progs. Followup-To: comp.os.linux.misc Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 08:38:12 GMT Organization: Flexsys Lines: 48 Approved: linux-announce(a)news.ornl.gov (Mikko Rauhala) Message-ID: <pycola.905243893.18924(a)laulujoutsen.pc.helsinki.fi> Reply-To: alatham(a)flexsys-group.com NNTP-Posting-Host: laulujoutsen.pc.helsinki.fi Old-Date: Sat, 05 Sep 1998 14:43:19 +0200 X-No-Archive: yes X-Auth: PGPMoose V1.1 PGP comp.os.linux.announce iQCVAgUBNfTs+lrUI/eHXJZ5AQEL7QQAm4TJb/hig4GSK4jpwd2PhuA8IKynybEF L+5ki9aYooX3Je/LdyvHVeg9kFL0IM8qdYNK01W6jJDqscoM4Hlp8KstxmpIDn1v OTBF9AbX4HQKUKO3J1UcNn+J89WZN/lmSB9lcgnJ6YAaKWpAYPVUFaoOoTPgHTg4 ITpeWxe/v9s= =w014 Xref: nntp.net-link.net comp.os.linux.announce:1426 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- ppdd is an advanced encrypted file system for i386 Linux only. It is used in a similar way to the loop device and offers simplicity and speed plus full strength encryption (128 bit). The design takes into consideration the fact that data on disc has a long lifetime and that an attacker may have the matching plaintext to much of the cyphertext. A combination of master/working pass phrases offers enhanced security for backup copies. Current status is BETA and comments on the implemenation and underlying crypography are most welcome. It consists of a kernel patch plus support programs and is intended for users with enough knowledge to compile the kernel, setup lilo, partition disks etc. It is not for absolute beginners or "non technical" users just yet. Available from: http://pweb.de.uu.net/flexsys.mtk Package is ppdd-0.4.tgz, pgp signature is also available from same url. Allan Latham <alatham(a)flexsys-group.com> - -- This article has been digitally signed by the moderator, using PGP. http://www.iki.fi/mjr/cola-public-key.asc has PGP key for validating signature. Send submissions for comp.os.linux.announce to: linux-announce(a)news.ornl.gov PLEASE remember a short description of the software and the LOCATION. This group is archived at http://www.iki.fi/mjr/linux/cola.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: 2.6.3i Charset: latin1 iQCVAgUBNfTs+lrUI/eHXJZ5AQEWhQP9Fd7tlWEZs/jG5Kcq/foSJBW6Me/WXS1W wRgKukImIl/DstOW9Ni1ZhfEoT4xwp0fpnVPdl+5aPG76thLv/T4iVRwVwh47hem y34x3IbvKnX6jvOqONEvrYbGL3CreMd1QWq3YuXUTZUVJVZVb6nSL4Wh5vKt/0na ijokp4QDMDk= =K4sO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- end of forwarded message --

1 0

Re: Tax silliness (fwd)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Forwarded message: > Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 19:04:02 -0700 > From: Tim May <tcmay(a)got.net> > Subject: Re: Tax silliness > not issued a royal decree absolving the perpetrator of taxes, they could > have collected taxes on the guy who got the ball and then taxes on the guy > who had the ball given to him. Through the miracle of multiple taxation, > the IRS gets it all....) That isn't accurate. The tax was a 'gift tax' and the ONLY person required to pay tax on it is the person GIVING the gift. Had you actualy read the announcement by the IRS it states very clearly that the reciever is NOT responsible for any taxes. ____________________________________________________________________ The seeker is a finder. Ancient Persian Proverb The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

IP: ISPI Clips 4.25:UK Police May Soon Tap Your Email & Internet Use At Will
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: "ama-gi ISPI" <offshore(a)email.msn.com> Subject: IP: ISPI Clips 4.25:UK Police May Soon Tap Your Email & Internet Use At Will Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 01:16:50 -0700 To: <Undisclosed.Recipients(a)majordomo.pobox.com> ISPI Clips 4.25:UK Police May Soon Tap Your Email & Internet Use At Will News & Info from the Institute for the Study of Privacy Issues (ISPI) Tuesday September 8, 1998 ISPI4Privacy(a)ama-gi.com ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ This From: The Independent Network, Monday September 7, 1998 http://www.independent.co.uk The PC in your mailbox: The police may soon be allowed to read your email and check your Internet use at will. http://www.independent.co.uk/net/980907ne/index.html By Paul Lavin When you drop an envelope in a red pillar-box, you walk away confident that your mail will not be read by anyone except the addressee. However, when you send an email, it might be wise to reflect on the differences. According to the organisation Internet Freedom, an agreement being negotiated between the UK's internet service providers (ISPs) and the police will open the email of the UK's eight million Internet users to scrutiny without debate in Parliament or oversight by the courts or the Home Secretary. British police are said to be close to reaching an agreement with ISPs that will enable them to monitor customers' emails and web usage logs. Chris Ellison of Internet Freedom, says: "Following a series of meetings between the Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) and Internet industry representatives, we understand that both groups have stated a willingness to reach a 'memorandum of understanding' about implementing police access to private data held by ISPs." According to David Kennedy, chairman of the Internet Service Providers Association, that is a serious overstatement of the discussions. However, he admits that the UK's ISPs are trying to avoid being flooded by court orders or having the police cart off critical servers for evidence. He says: "We are talking to law enforcement representatives to find a way to work with them within the legal framework that exists. All members of our association take the view that emails are private." As with the understanding between the Metropolitan Police and the ISPs over "banned" Usenet newsgroups and the closing down of web sites that may breach the law, the significance of such an agreement is that any such police activity may not be subjected to judicial review or legal constraint. Detective Chief Superintendent Keith Ackerman, chairman of the ACPO's computing crimes sub-committee, says: "We want to ensure the criminal doesn't take best advantage of the Internet, without requiring the Government to use the sledgehammer of regulation. However, we are not looking for the ability to go on fishing expeditions." The ISPs know that they are stuck in the middle, according to Keith Mitchell, chairman of Linx, a partnership of large ISPs. He says: "To divulge private email even under duress would be commercial suicide for an ISP. In some circumstances it would constitute a crime." Nonetheless, mistakes happen and there are well-known cases where the police have been persuasive. Mitchell says: "The current laws do not adequately protect ISPs or private individuals. We will be active in seeking responsive changes from Parliament." While there are undoubtedly individuals who use the Internet's email and worldwide web for nefarious purposes, the vast majority of people who use email and the web for personal and business communications have an expectation of privacy. And law-abiding citizens who wholeheartedly support the goals of law enforcement agencies may nevertheless feel uneasy about giving them carte blanche over email. America Online has been quite vocal in its opposition to opening the doors to the police short of a court order. Many ISPs agree. Julie Hatch, marketing communications director of Easynet, says:"We do not allow anyone to access our customers' email without a court order. "It makes no difference if it is an estranged wife or a suspicious business partner or anyone else, we would not divulge a subscriber's private email unless we were presented with a court order. This is in accordance with our terms and conditions. "Our business is also subject to restrictions imposed by the Data Protection Act (DPA), and in any situation we would certainly abide by those rules. So unless a subscriber's actions are illegal, you can say that email is confidential." The DPA provides scanty protection to email users, however. While the Act has aspects that protect the quality and use of information held in computer systems, disclosure can be afforded by a compliant ISP by simply including appropriate language in the small print of their terms and conditions. Data may be revealed to law enforcement officials as long as the subscriber is notified. Easynet's assurances highlight the differences between ISPs that are classified as telecoms providers, protected from feeling the long arm of the law by a regulatory framework, and those that are merely private businesses unaccountable to anyone but their owners and governed solely by their contracts with subscribers. As well as Easynet, UK ISPs that are regulated as telecoms providers include BT Internet and Demon, which is now part of Scottish Telecom. Smaller ISPs are more vulnerable to the persuasive demands of the police.They have no legally protected right of privacy and any redress for email disclosure would only be for breach of contract. Furthermore, most ISPs now include in their terms and conditions a requirement that the subscriber bear the expense of any legal costs resulting from their use of the service. This could lead to a complaining subscriber having to bear the costs of both sides of a lawsuit against an ISP even if they won. The most serious aspect of this potential agreement between the police and ISPS is, according to critics, the absence of legal safeguards. In order to tap telephones, the police need the permission of the Home Secretary and must justify violating the privacy of a suspect. It is not clear from the law whether tapping a telephone and tapping into an email exchange are the same thing. Chris Ellison says: "This is what is so dangerous about the new culture of private regulation and moral responsibility. ISPs now operate in a moral climate which insists on limitations for freedom of speech. Any material that causes offence - especially to children and ethnic minorities - is regularly removed. ISPs have now embraced this self-censorship credo and are willing to set themselves up as moral arbiters of internet content, filtering out anything that they feel may be illegal." Without public debate or scrutiny by Parliament, the police are likely to gain, as Liz Parratt from the organisation Liberty puts it, "a snoopers' charter for the Internet". Ordinary users will have little legal protection or redress against police monitoring of their communications. This trend could render the Internet less private and more regulated than any other communications medium. "If nothing else, these discussions have demonstrated what self-regulation really means: ISPs undertaking the role of publicly unaccountable instruments of law enforcement." Email is not like a letter in an envelope; it is more like a postcard. Just as you would not put some messages on a postcard, you should think before you use email for your most private communications. While the legality and desirability of the any agreement between ACPO and the ISPs is highly debatable, anyone interested in maintaining their privacy on the Internet must take responsibility for their own actions. The agreement between ACPO and ISPs will be the subject of three seminars: 22 September in Edinburgh, 8 October in London and 27 October in Manchester. Additional details can be found at http://www.linx.net/misc/acposeminar.html . --------------------------------NOTICE:------------------------------ ISPI Clips are news & opinion articles on privacy issues from all points of view; they are clipped from local, national and international newspapers, journals and magazines, etc. Inclusion as an ISPI Clip does not necessarily reflect an endorsement of the content or opinion by ISPI. In compliance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed free without profit or payment for non-profit research and educational purposes only. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ISPI Clips is a FREE e-mail service from the "Institute for the Study of Privacy Issues" (ISPI). To receive "ISPI Clips" on a daily bases (approx. 4 - 8 clips per day) send the following message "Please enter [Your Name] into the ISPI Clips list: [Your e-mail address]" to: ISPIClips(a)ama-gi.com . The Institute for the Study of Privacy Issues (ISPI) is a small contributor-funded organization based in Victoria, British Columbia (Canada). ISPI operates on a not-for-profit basis, accepts no government funding and takes a global perspective. ISPI's mandate is to conduct & promote interdisciplinary research into electronic, personal and financial privacy with a view toward helping ordinary people understand the degree of privacy they have with respect to government, industry and each other and to likewise inform them about techniques to enhance their privacy. But, none of this can be accomplished without your kind and generous financial support. If you value in the ISPI Clips service or if you are concerned about the erosion of your privacy in general, won't you please help us continue this important work by becoming an "ISPI Clips Supporter" or by taking out an institute Membership? We gratefully accept all contributions: Less than $60 ISPI Clips Supporter $60 - $99 Primary ISPI Membership (1 year) $100 - $300 Senior ISPI Membership (2 years) More than $300 Executive Council Membership (life) Your ISPI "membership" contribution entitles you to receive "The ISPI Privacy Reporter" (our bi-monthly 12 page hard-copy newsletter in multi-contributor format) for the duration of your membership. For a contribution form with postal instructions please send the following message "ISPI Contribution Form" to ISPI4Privacy(a)ama-gi.com . We maintain a strict privacy policy. Any information you divulge to ISPI is kept in strict confidence. It will not be sold, lent or given away to any third party. ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

IP: Machine Vision For Biometric Applications
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: believer(a)telepath.com Subject: IP: Machine Vision For Biometric Applications Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 09:07:57 -0500 To: believer(a)telepath.com ---------------------- NOTE: Document contains instructive images. You should go to the website and open the images. ---------------------- Source: Applied Optics Group at the University of Kent at Canterbury (U.K.) http://speke.ukc.ac.uk/physical-sciences/aog/facereco/ Machine Vision For Biometric Applications We are currently conducting research in the areas of automated facial recognition and data compression of digitised images of the human face. This work began by performing an eigenfactor analysis on a data set comprising 290 faces drawn largely from the student population at the University of Kent, Canterbury. The image below shows the first three components (eigenfaces) resulting from this analysis. It is interesting to note that eigenfaces 2 and 3 have a clear relationship to gender. Thus the addition of eigenface 2 to the average eigenface (1) results in a feminine face whereas the subtraction of face 2 produces a face having masculine characteristics. In a similar way, addition of face 3 to the average produces a masculine face and subtraction of face 3 from the average results in a face having feminine features. This approach, variously known as the Karhunen-Loeve expansion, eigenfactor analysis, principal components or the Hotelling transform has exceptional data compression properties when applied to this particular pattern class (2-D images of human faces). Below, we show the image reconstruction quality that is achievable using codes of varying lengths which describe how to reconstitute the image using the component eigenfaces as a basis. Note that the subject shown here was not included in the original data set used to generate the eigenface basis. Despite this, recognition is achieved using a very short code. This method works particularly well when conditions such as head-camera orientation and subject illumination are controlled.We are now investigating other methods (some related to the Karhunen-Loeve expansion, some not) which may be suitable for automated facial recognition under less benign conditions. In particular, we are beginning to investigate the use of illumination compensation techniques and 3-D imaging techniques which are independent of illumination conditions. The group working on facial recognition here at UKC collaborates with a number of commercial/industrial organisations in the U.K. and Europe. We currently await the outcome of a cooperative research bid (CRAFT) to the European Commission which will involve the development of facial biometrics for smart cards and other access control applications. The industrial partners are Neural Computer Sciences (U.K.), Datastripe Ltd (U.K.), Inside Technologies (France), Smartkort (Iceland) and A la Carte (Belgium). More links on Facial Recognition Staff Involved Dr. C.J. Solomon - E-mail: C.J.Solomon(a)ukc.ac.uk Jamie P. Brooker - E-mail: jpb3(a)ukc.ac.uk ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

[FP] FW: Bill to Limit Nat'l ID Plan
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: "ScanThisNews" <mcdonalds(a)airnet.net> Subject: [FP] FW: Bill to Limit Nat'l ID Plan Date: Fri, 4 Sep 1998 22:09:53 -0500 To: "Scan This News Recipients List" <scan(a)efga.org> [Forwarded message from:] believer(a)telepath.com [mailto:believer@telepath.com] Sent: Monday, May 05, 1997 3:12 PM To: believer(a)telepath.com Subject: Bill to Limit Nat'l ID Plan --------------------------- NOTE TO LISTEES: Remember: LIMITING is NOT what we want. Limiting will only detail the terms and conditions under which a National ID *W*I*L*L* be required. We want no ID at all. Let's make this clear to legislators. They still don't get it. --------------------------- Source: Washington Post http://search.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WAPO/19980904/V000365-090498-idx.htm l Senate Mulls Healthcare ID Proposal By Cassandra Burrell Associated Press Writer Friday, September 4, 1998; 1:39 a.m. EDT WASHINGTON (AP) -- A plan to assign every American a lifetime health-care ID number, similar to a Social Security number, could face new limits under a measure headed for Senate debate. A provision introduced Thursday by Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison, R-Texas, would prohibit the Health and Human Services Department from going forward with the plan until Congress approves its specifics. Critics say the system, being developed as part of the 1996 Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, could invade privacy by opening medical histories to insurers, employers and others. The law guarantees that anyone changing or losing a job would be able to get health insurance, even with a pre-existing medical condition. ``The plan, as HHS intended to carry it forward, raises questions of excessive government involvement and control -- not to mention privacy,'' Hutchison said. The Senate Appropriations Committee added Hutchison's amendment to an $82 billion spending bill funding the Labor, Education and Health and Human Services departments as well as several related agencies for the fiscal year that begins Oct. 1. The committee approved the overall bill with little debate and sent it to the Senate. But some members said they planned to introduce more controversial issues into the bill during floor debate, including provisions dealing with federal funding of single-sex classrooms and allowing Medicare recipients to go outside the program for care not covered by the plan. President Clinton has threatened to veto a matching bill in the House because it lacks money for some of his favorite programs, such as summer jobs for poor youth and low-income heating assistance. Also Thursday, the Senate resolved a dispute over staffing at the Federal Election Commission, clearing the way for passage of a $29.9 billion spending bill funding the Treasury Department and related agencies. The Treasury bill was pulled from the Senate floor in late July because of Democratic objections to a Republican amendment that would have made it easier to remove the FEC's staff director and general counsel. With resolution of the issue, the bill passed 91-5 Thursday without further debate. Introduced by Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., the disputed amendment sought to limit to four years the currently open-ended terms of the two officials and to require approval of four of the FEC's six commissioners before the terms could be extended. Each party selects three commissioners. Democrats, led by Sen. Carl Levin of Michigan, contended the amendment would let one party remove an official for no reason and undermine the agency's independence. Under a compromise worked out with Levin, the current general counsel and staff director would not have term limits, future service would be set at six years with votes of only three commissioners required to approve an extension. The $27 billion House bill, which passed in July, does not include language on the FEC staffers. Differences will have to be worked out in a House-Senate conference. The Senate bill, which would increase money for drug enforcement, gang resistance and customer service by the Internal Revenue Service, establishes spending at $7.85 billion for the IRS, $1.7 billion for the U.S. Customs Service and $593 million for the Secret Service. Like the House bill, it would freeze salaries for members of Congress but would allow 3.6 percent cost-of-living raises for other federal workers. It also was amended to require federal employee health plans that cover prescription drugs to provide coverage for contraceptives. © Copyright 1998 The Associated Press ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml -----------------------

1 0

IP: [FP] Congress's Secret Plans to Get Our Medical Records
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: "ScanThisNews" <mcdonalds(a)airnet.net> Subject: IP: [FP] Congress's Secret Plans to Get Our Medical Records Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 06:47:05 -0500 To: ignition-point(a)majordomo.pobox.com Congress's Secret Plans to Get Our Medical Records http://www.eagleforum.org/column/1998/aug98/98-08-19.html August 19, 1998 Americans were outraged to learn about the Federal Government's plans to assign a personal identification number to every medical patient. But Congress nevertheless passed H.R. 4250, the so-called Patient Protection Act, which allows anyone who maintains your personal medical records to gather, exchange and distribute them. The only condition on distribution is that the information be used for "health care operations," which is a vague and meaningless limitation that does not even exclude marketing. Even worse, H.R. 4250 preempts state laws that currently protect patients from unauthorized distribution of their medical records. While the sponsors of H.R. 4250 claim that they did not intend for the information to be circulated for "just anything," their spokesman confirmed that personal medical records would be used for future programs concerning health quality and disease management. When the Kennedy-Kassebaum law was passed in 1996, we were told it was to improve access to health insurance. The law became explosively controversial last month when the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) began to implement the Kennedy-Kassebaum "unique health care identifiers" so that government can electronically tag, track and monitor every citizen's personal medical records. After this news broke on July 18, embarrassed Congressmen inserted a line in H.R. 4250, which passed July 24, ordering HHS not to promulgate "a final standard" without Congressional authorization. That language is a total phony; it doesn't prevent HHS from issuing proposed or interim standards (which will become de facto standards) or from collecting medical data. So much money is involved in accessing and controlling personal information that the Washington lobbyists are moving rapidly to lock in the extraordinary powers conferred by the Kennedy-Kassebaum law. That explains these sneaky eleventh-hour inserts in pending legislation. On August 4, the House passed yet another bill to protect the gathering of personal information on private citizens. To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, there they go again. Just before passing H.R. 2281, a bill about copyrights on the Internet, the House quietly attached a separate and dangerous bill deceptively entitled the "Collections of Information Antipiracy Act." No one, of course, is in favor of "piracy," but the impact of this bill goes far beyond any reasonable definition of piracy. By the legerdemain of inserting it in another bill, it will go straight to a House-Senate conference committee under a procedure designed to avoid debate or amendments in the Senate. This Collections of Information bill (now part of H.R. 2281), in effect, creates a new federal property right to own, manage and control personal information about you, including your name, address, telephone number, medical records, and "any other intangible material capable of being collected and organized in a systematic way." This new property right provides a powerful incentive for corporations to build nationwide databases of the personal medical information envisioned by the Kennedy-Kassebaum law and the Patient Protection bill. Under the Collections of Information bill, any information about you can be owned and controlled by others under protection of Federal law. Your medical chart detailing your visits to your doctor, for example, would suddenly become the federally protected property of other persons or corporations, and their rights (not your rights) would be protected by Federal police power. This bill will encourage health care corporations to assign a unique national health identifier to each patient. The government can then simply agree to use a privately-assigned national identifier, and Clinton's longtime goal of government control of health care will be achieved. This bill creates a new federal crime that penalizes a first offense by a fine of up to $250,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both, for interfering with this new property right. It even authorizes Federal judges to order seizure of property before a finding of wrongdoing. H.R. 2281 grants these new Federal rights only to private databases, and pretends to exclude the government's own efforts to collect information about citizens. But a loophole in the bill permits private firms to share their Federally protected data with the government so long as the information is not collected under a specific government agency or license agreement. This loophole will encourage corporations, foundations, Washington insiders and political donors, to build massive databases of citizens' medical and other personal records, and then share that data with the government. And, under the House-passed bill cynically called the Patient Protection Act, patients would be unable to invoke state privacy laws to protect their personal records. Meanwhile, in another aspect of the Federal takeover of all Americans' health care, the Centers for Disease Control is aggressively building a national database of all children's medical records through the ruse of tracking immunizations. Tell your Congressman and Senators you won't vote for them in the upcoming elections unless they immediately stop all Federal plans to track and monitor our health or immunization records. Phyllis Schlafly column 8-19-98 [thanks to jim groom for finding this piece] [message forwarded by] ======================================================================= Reply to: <fingerprint(a)networkusa.org> ======================================================================= To subscribe to the free Scan This News newsletter, send a message to <majordomo(a)efga.org> and type "subscribe scan" in the BODY. Or, to be removed type "unsubscribe scan" in the message BODY. For additional instructions see www.efga.org/about/maillist.html ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "Scan This News" is Sponsored by S.C.A.N. Host of the "FIGHT THE FINGERPRINT!" web page: www.networkusa.org/fingerprint.shtml ======================================================================= ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

IP: [FP] FW: Americans love a police state
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: "ScanThisNews" <mcdonalds(a)airnet.net> Subject: IP: [FP] FW: Americans love a police state Date: Tue, 8 Sep 1998 06:46:54 -0500 To: ignition-point(a)majordomo.pobox.com [Forwarded message] [The driver's license/ID serves as the link, giving police the "authority" to set up so-called "DUI checkpoints." These are in reality ID checkpoints. That is the fact. They can stop you and ask to se the DL/ID because it actually belongs to the state and the state can demand it any time they like. The next time you hear someone talking about how great these DUI stops are, just remember, they are really ID checkpoints -- do you have your papers?] ------------------------------- WND - Letters to the editor http://www.worldnetdaily.com/e-mail/98.e-mail.html Americans love a police state I think I've said this before but I'm amazed how our society (America) has adopted like a favorite pet, the concept of DUI CHECKPOINTS. They don't even call them POLICE CHECKPOINTS but DUI CHECKPOINTS because the MAD mothers convinced America that everyone must be a drunk driver, therefore you need DUI CHECKPOINTS. Remember, it is for the children! I heard a news brief this morning telling viewers "this holiday weekend most law enforcement agencies in the city and county (San Diego) will be conducting DUI checkpoints." Then the report showed statistics of a checkpoint that was conducted last night saying 643 cars were checked and 4 drivers were arrested, three for DUI while seven cars were impounded. My math shows that only less than one half of one-percent (00.47 percent) were DUI in the checkpoint last night. This clearly should be evidence to the Beanie Baby collectors in their sport utility vehicles that people who are not intoxicated while driving are being subject to arrest for other items along with drivers having their cars towed because they missed an insurance payment or did not register their car because the new SMOG II standards caused their car to be classified as a GORE or GROSS POLLUTER. By the way, the insurance companies in America are some of the most corrupt and greedy institutions that contribute to all those politicians who require you have insurance. Talk about the oligarchs in Russia, we have them here already! As Americans we thought we had free speech and free movement but not with these checkpoints. And you know how they tell you that you can turn around before a checkpoint to avoid it? WRONG! The Supreme Court did rule that there must be a sign with a point that vehicles may do a 180 but the problem is that law enforcement actively posts a patrol vehicle or two with lights off near that turn-around point and then they follow whoever avoids the checkpoint and stop them on probable cause. When will these checkpoints seize cash if you cannot account for the $1,000 you carry? They are already doing this at the border leaving America. When will these checkpoints seize anti-government printed e-mail messages (I carry this kind of stuff in my car, sometimes books on the New World Order or Illuminati) because of a new ANTI-TERRORIST LAW? This week your friendly politicians held hearings interviewing Louis Freeh of FBI and ex-CIA Directors (most of the ex-Directors are dead now, i.e. Colby and Casey, etc., so I think they only had one to use) with an active discussion that items that were originally thrown out of the ANTI TERRORIST BILL need to be re-included to protect against those nasty Islamic terrorists. Sure! I also have a King James Bible in my car (been accident free for at least 300,000 miles) and maybe one day at the checkpoint they'll grab that and say "don't get caught with that again." "You know those Christians are dangerous people" the two cops will say to one another, "those Christians are against abortion and euthanasia, can you believe that Sam?" DARREN -----Original Message----- From: Jim Groom [mailto:gs924jfj@mon-cre.net] Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 1998 5:11 AM To: Current Events Subject: Americans love a police state ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

IP: " Will Y2K usher in TEOTWAWKI?"
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: believer(a)telepath.com Subject: IP: " Will Y2K usher in TEOTWAWKI?" Date: Wed, 09 Sep 1998 12:49:38 -0500 To: believer(a)telepath.com Source: Dallas Morning News http://www.dallasnews.com/texas-southwest-nf/tsw1.htm Turn for the worst? 09/06/98 By Victorial Loe Hicks / The Dallas Morning News A CAVE IN ARKANSAS - Will Y2K usher in TEOTWAWKI? Bryan Elder is sure it will - so sure that he'll be deep beneath the ground on Jan. 1, 2000. "As soon as I get a cave, I'm going to live in it," Mr. Elder vowed, wending his way through one Arkansas cavern. "I'll be the world's next caveman." Y2K is the pop-culture moniker for the programming glitch that left millions of computers and other devices unable to recognize dates beyond the year 1999. The disruption will depend on how many faulty mainframes, PCs and microchips - in everything from nuclear plants to VCRs - can be detected and fixed in the next 16 months. Most people regard Y2K with mild to moderate anxiety. But a flourishing subculture insists that it portends nothing less than TEOTWAWKI (tee-OH-tawa-kee): The End of the World as We Know It. "There won't be any accidental survivors," said Mr. Elder, who believes that computer failures will short-circuit the electric grid and the transportation system, fostering severe food shortages and social anarchy. "I'm not afraid of dying," he said. "I'd prefer not to starve to death." His scenario - which also envisions nuclear war, bombardment by asteroids, incineration by solar windstorm, the flip-flop of the North and South poles, an ice age and the second coming of Jesus Christ - is one of the more dramatic, even among Y2K alarmists. But he isn't alone in hunkering down. Merchants of survival goods say business is booming, primarily driven by new customers who are girding for Y2K. Anecdotes abound of city dwellers, including some computer jocks, who are poised to flee to the boonies, where they can store and grow food without having to fend off rapacious neighbors. Dallas systems analyst Steve Watson told Wired magazine that he bought 500 remote Oklahoma acres and several guns after recognizing the full ramifications of the Y2K crisis. Mr. Watson did not respond to interview requests from The Dallas Morning News. A vice president of the firm he works for, DMR Consulting, said Mr. Watson had come to regret his public stance, which "the company doesn't share." But in one respect, every cautionary voice is right. Y2K is absolutely guaranteed to happen. In a mounting wave that will crest powerfully on Jan. 1, 2000, computers will encounter dates in which the two-digit year field reads 00, which "noncompliant" computers will read as 1900. Depending on whether a particular computer needs to know what year it is - to calculate accrued interest, for example, or to track maintenance schedules of industrial machinery - it may go on working normally, produce bad data or simply freeze up. If enough computers fail - say, at banks or telephone companies - the whole country, perhaps the world, could wake up with a whale of a New Year's hangover. By some estimates, industries and governments will spend as much as $600 billion to make things right. Even so, the Gartner Group, a research firm that has studied the issue since 1989, forecasts that half of the companies around the world will experience some disruption of their operations, further sapping an already woozy global economy. Precisely who will get hurt, how badly and for how long is the question - a question impossible to answer. "The uncertainty factor is immense. That's what makes this prophetic material," said Dr. Richard Landes, director of the Center for Millennial Studies at Boston University. "Back when I first heard about Y2K, I immediately realized that this would be grist for the apocalyptic prophets' mills." At a vigorous 32, Mr. Elder hardly fits the hoary image of a prophet. A marketing major from the University of Arkansas, he ran his own hydraulic service company until a couple of years ago, when he began devoting himself to studies of biblical prophecies and other spiritual texts. "The angel of death, that's how I feel," he said. He wants urgently for others to heed his warning, to believe, as he does, that anyone who remains above ground faces certain annihilation. Once the power grid goes dark, as he is sure it will, the financial system will collapse, he said. "Then we're back to the barter system and 'How much food do you have?' " That's only a prelude however. On May 5, 2000, Mr. Elder said, most of the planets in the solar system will align themselves on the opposite side of the sun from Earth. That will trigger the solar gales and the asteroid shower, which will precipitate still further catastrophes. "The computer problem will weed out a lot, and the solar wind will get the rest," he said. "The time to prepare is right now." For prepare, read: find a cave. Mr. Elder has his sights on one near Cassville, Mo., that he figures can accommodate 125 people. If he can reach a deal with the present owners, he plans to add plumbing, ventilation, diesel-fired generators, grow lights and enough basic supplies to sustain life for as long as seven years. Everyone will share the costs - $11,743 per person, he calculates. Byron Kirkwood isn't ready to live in a cave, but he does plan to be prepared for Y2K. Which in his case is easy, since he runs a mail-order survival products business from his rural Oklahoma home. He started the company six years ago, after his wife, Annie, said she received messages from the Virgin Mary - which she passed on in a series of books - warning that cataclysmic "earth changes" were imminent. These days, though, most of Mr. Kirkwood's customers are more worried about whether Y2K will cripple the U.S. economy than whether the Earth is about to turn on its side and acquire a second sun. Mrs. Kirkwood said Mary has not explicitly addressed Y2K, although she did warn recently that "major changes . . . will come about through government, banking institutions and telecommunications. Your power sources will be interrupted, and your life will change drastically." "That sure fits Y2K," Mr. Kirkwood said, "but she didn't come right out and say, 'The computers will fail.' " In any case, he said, sales of his survival products are up five-fold over last year, with water filters, hand-cranked radios and long-shelf-life foods leading the list. A rack in his office displays freeze-dried entrees - pepper steak, cheese ravioli and chili - packaged with individual chemical heating units. Some orders have come from as far away as Hong Kong and Austria. Like many Y2K pessimists, he gets much of his information and does much of his business via the Internet - using computers to bewail humankind's impending betrayal by computers. "I'm not trying to be a doomsayer," Mr. Kirkwood said. "I only give TEOTWAWKI a 10 percent chance of happening." However, he said, if food becomes scarce, "there's not enough police, not enough national guard, not enough military to go around." Those who stockpile food, water and cash - or who head for the hills - may look foolish to those who don't, he said, but only time will tell who are the real fools. "Some of us will look stupid one way, or some of us will look stupid the other way," he said. "You just don't know which side of stupid you're going to be on." Although Y2K is a purely technological, secular problem, there is a strong nexus between Y2K anxieties and religious millennialism, which predicts a catastrophic cleansing as the precursor to a new paradise. Like the Kirkwoods and Mr. Elder, the Dallas Area Y2K Community Preparedness Group is overtly Christian. The Rev. Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network has extensive Y2K links on its Web site. And Dr. Gary North, whom some regard as the Paul Revere of the Y2K crisis, is prominent in the Religious Reconstruction movement, which advocates replacing the Constitution with biblical law. Dr. North used to live in Tyler, Texas, but he has moved to northern Arkansas, which, like eastern Oklahoma, offers solitude to separatists of various persuasions. "The millennial myth can take secular or religious forms," said Dr. Philip Lamy, a sociologist at Castleton State College in Vermont who studies millennial movements. Regardless of the form, he said, the driving force is angst about today's rapid social change - change as momentous as that experienced during the Industrial Revolution. "What a lot of millennial groups are trying to do is hold onto the past," Dr. Lamy said. "They are merely saying that they're afraid." Of course, fear is not an unreasonable response. "This is not a false issue," said Bill Wachel, a computer consultant who founded DFW Prep 2000, a forum in which industry representatives share information on the issue. "It's possible, yeah, that the whole world could come apart. Is it probable? No." Dr. Leon Kappelman of the University of North Texas is leading the charge for government to pressure crucial industries such as electric utilities, telecommunications and medicine to fix Y2K problems. He isn't anticipating doom, but he doubts that many Americans will escape unscathed. "I don't really know what the future is. I know there are serious risks," he said. "I expect life to be a little more difficult for awhile." He has no use for those who choose to flee. "Cowards would be a good word [for them]," he said. "Deserters." Dr. Landes, too, urges Americans to hang together rather than hang separately. "Y2K can be a gift," he said. "It's a test. How do we as a culture handle this - not only the problem, but the rhetoric surrounding the problem?" As Mr. Elder explored the cave he had chosen to demonstrate to a visitor the wisdom of his plan, he came upon artifacts of a earlier era's doomsday fears. Next to a sign designating the cavern as an official fallout shelter lay tins of 1950s-vintage survival rations. The tins were unopened and pocked with rust. © 1998 The Dallas Morning News ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

IP: Industrial Espionage Increases as Firms Seek Competitive Edge
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: Richard Sampson <rjsa(a)sprintmail.com> Subject: IP: Industrial Espionage Increases as Firms Seek Competitive Edge Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1998 12:52:43 -0400 To: "ignition-point(a)majordomo.pobox.com" <ignition-point(a)majordomo.pobox.com> Industrial Espionage Increases as Firms Seek Competitive Edge Sep. 6 (The Record/KRTBN)--The place: the Four Seasons Hotel, Philadelphia. The date: June 14, 1997. On one side of the table, two men from a Taiwanese company hoping to expand into biotechnology. On the other, an FBI agent posing as an information broker, and a researcher from Princeton-based Bristol-Myers Squibb posing as a corrupt scientist preparing to sell a piece of his company's soul. On the table: a sheaf of papers -- stamped "confidential" in big, black letters -- representing the company's investment of hundreds of millions of dollars in Taxol, the blockbuster anti-cancer drug. The asking price, according to the FBI: $200,000 and a percentage of sales. The drama played out in that hotel room -- which ended when additional FBI agents burst through the door and arrested the Taiwanese -- marked the first federal sting operation against alleged spies for a foreign corporation. But industrial espionage today is far from unusual. U.S. companies are increasingly being looted of some of their most precious technical secrets by competitors -- both foreign and domestic -- using legal and illegal methods. And New Jersey's research labs and high-tech companies -- particularly pharmaceutical companies -- are prime targets. >From 1992 to 1996, according to one study, the number of cases of industrial espionage at the nation's 1,300 largest companies nearly doubled to about 1,100. The potential commercial value of the stolen information was pegged at $300 billion. Richard Heffernan, a Branford, Conn., consultant who conducted the study for the American Society of Industrial Security of Alexandria, Va., said New Jersey pharmaceutical companies -- including Merck & Co., Schering-Plough, Warner-Lambert, and Johnson & Johnson -- have all been targeted by corporate spies. The reason: the hundreds of new products in their research and development pipelines -- products that require huge investments in time and money. Those pipelines hold the potential for billions of dollars in profits. "New Jersey is one of the top 10 areas for corporate espionage," said Heffernan, who has advised a number of New Jersey drug companies on ways to protect their secrets. "This is not a new thing for pharmaceutical companies, and it's become progressively worse. There's so much money to be made from the theft of their information. That pipeline is a very deep, rich vein of gold." In addition to illegal intrusions -- which can include anything from hacking into a private computer to buying trade secrets from a company insider -- more companies are targeting competitors' secrets using legal -- but in some cases, unethical, or highly intrusive -- methods. Membership in the Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals -- an Alexandria, Va., group that advocates the use of legal methods to gather business intelligence on competitors -- has skyrocketed in recent years, more than quadrupling since 1990. For the most part, competitive intelligence professionals analyze data from public sources -- news reports, databases, trade shows, and the like. But they also tap more questionable sources, such as satellite photos. And they have indicated a widespread willingness to step over ethical lines to obtain information on business rivals. In a survey published in April by the competitive intelligence group, participants -- all corporate spies -- were given several scenarios and asked to choose from various options on how to proceed. Nearly half said they were willing to misrepresent the purpose of their research, 30 percent were prepared to read a marketing report left on an adjacent airplane seat, more than 70 percent said it was permissible to pump a new hire for confidential information about her previous employer, and 20 percent were willing to read and use a competitor's proprietary product data. All of those tactics violate the competitive intelligence group's own code of ethics, and the last might step over legal lines as well, according to the survey's authors. "I think there is room for some very legitimate information gathering that's important for companies to do," said Gayle Porter, an authority on business ethics at Rutgers University. "But I think there are probably many, many, many examples of people taking it too far." In New Jersey, there are abundant examples of companies alleging that they have been targets of industrial espionage -- or who have been accused of targeting others. In 1996, Boehringer Mannheim Corp., a German drug company competing against New Brunswick-based Johnson & Johnson in the $1.75 billion market for blood-monitoring devices, sued J&J and its LifeScan subsidiary in federal court. Boehringer alleged that LifeScan offered employees incentives for spying on its archrival, and that LifeScan employees sneaked into Boehringer sales meetings in Indiana, Florida, Turkey, and Germany to obtain proprietary product information. J&J denied the charges and in a countersuit said Boehringer hired detectives to obtain secrets and had workers pose as customers. Boehringer acknowledged some of J&J's charges, including that it had reprimanded an executive for posing as an importer to obtain a demonstration of a product not yet on the market, and that it had maintained a "competitive kill team" targeted at LifeScan. But the two companies reached an out-of-court settlement in 1997, agreeing to keep the terms of the settlement secret. J&J spokesman Jeffrey Leebaw declined to comment. Boehringer did not return calls. Heffernan and others say industrial espionage is on the rise because of tougher competition in domestic markets, the targeting of U.S. trade secrets by foreign economic and industrial interests, and the combination of computer hackers with increasing technical sophistication and companies that are woefully unprepared to stop them. And they say one of the times companies become vulnerable is when high-level employees leave. Executives with knowledge of marketing plans for new products and researchers responsible for developing the next big scientific breakthrough are often exploited by their new employers to obtain a competitive edge. That is what Warner-Lambert of Morris Plains charged in a 1997 lawsuit that was subsequently dropped. The company spent 12 years and $17 million developing Procan SR, a sustained-release drug used to treat heart rhythm irregularities. The product won Food and Drug Administration approval in 1982. Warner-Lambert accused a former employee of giving the top-secret formulas for the drug to Copley Pharmaceutical Inc., a Canton, Mass., generic drug manufacturer she went to work for in 1984. Seven months after she joined the company, Copley asked the FDA to approve a generic version of the drug, which Copley eventually brought to market. Neither company would comment on the settlement that ended the matter, but Jason Ford, a Warner-Lambert spokesman, said the drug -- which was discontinued several years ago by the company -- was never a blockbuster. "It wasn't so much the stealing of the product," Ford said. "The main reason why we filed the lawsuit was to make it clear that we vigorously defend our intellectual property. It sends a loud and clear message that this is something we take very seriously." Another North Jersey company, the Wormser Corp. of Englewood Cliffs, also played a key role in an industrial espionage case involving a former employee -- not as the victim, but as the accused. The case centered on Frederick Marks III, a production manager employed by Powell Products Inc. of Colorado Springs, Colo., until 1993. According to a lawsuit filed by Powell in 1995, Marks took with him top-secret blueprints for a machine developed by Powell to mass-produce foam-tipped swabs more quickly and cheaply than any other machine then available. Powell accused the Wormser Corp. of bankrolling a plan to use the stolen blueprints to create a prototype of the Powell machine, and using the machine to compete against Powell. After two years of litigation, a Denver jury awarded Powell $2.7 million in damages and legal fees, but Powell settled with the Wormser Corp. for $1.7 million. Marks pleaded guilty to misdemeanor theft in February in exchange for his cooperation with the FBI. The Wormsers -- company president Stephen, and his sons, Alan and David -- have not been charged. David Wormser referred questions to Bill Meyer, a Boulder, Colo., lawyer who denied the allegations, saying the Wormsers settled with Powell to avoid "years and years" of legal wrangling. Powell President Stephen Robards said the Wormsers are the true culprits. "There's no question about it," he said. "The blueprints Marks stole would not have damaged us without the Wormsers' money. He didn't have the resources to start a business without them." Since the passage of the 1996 Economic Espionage Act (EEA) making the theft of trade secrets a felony, the FBI has become more involved in industrial espionage cases in which U.S. companies have been targeted by foreign or domestic interests. To date, five cases have been brought under the act, including one in July in which a Piscataway man -- a former scientist for Roche Diagnostics, a Branchburg division of Nutley-based Hoffmann-La Roche -- was charged with attempted theft of trade secrets from the company. According to the complaint, Huang Dao Pei tried to obtain secrets from a current Roche scientist about the company's hepatitis C diagnostic kit, hoping to market a similar kit in China. William Megary, special agent in charge of the FBI's Newark office, said individuals trying to steal American trade secrets are not "street thugs," but high-tech thieves who are "educated, resourceful, and elusive." "Our cases illustrate the complexity of not only how diverse the criminals are, but how diverse the crimes are, as well," he said. "The FBI is committed to enforcing the EEA. Our message is clear -- it is no longer open season on American technology." Even before the act became law, federal stings were not unheard of. In the Bristol-Myers Squibb case, FBI agent John Hartmann established himself as a technology information broker in 1995 and began laying a paper trail of more than 135 faxes, e-mail messages, telephone calls, and letters with the representatives of the Yuen Foong Paper Co., which would eventually lead to the fateful meeting at the Philadelphia hotel. Jane Kramer, a spokeswoman for Bristol-Myers Squibb, said the company uses "the most sophisticated techniques" for safeguarding its trade secrets, but she would not elaborate. When security is breached, she added, it is important for a company to fight the intruder with every weapon in its arsenal. "Taxol is a major advance in cancer treatment," she said, adding that the company's multimillion-dollar investment in research on the drug is more than repaid by its $1 billion in annual sales. "You have a dramatic investment in research and development that's the lifeblood of a company like ours. The ramifications are huge for our present and our future." In what authorities described as the largest industrial espionage case in U.S. history, a 1990 FBI sting led to charges against two men for stealing secrets valued at $1 billion from Merck & Co. in Whitehouse Station and Schering-Plough Corp. in Madison. Biochemist Bernard Mayles, a former employee of the two companies, and a confederate, Mario Miscio, were ultimately convicted of trying to sell the secret formulas for Ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug marketed by Merck, and Interferon, a cancer and hepatitis treatment sold by Schering-Plough. An FBI agent posing as a Chinese investor who wanted to convert an idle factory for Ivermectin production agreed to pay $1.5 million for the formula and the microorganism used to produce the drug. He promised to arrange the sale of the Interferon formula to a Polish investor for $10 million. Schering-Plough spokesman Ronald Asinari declined to comment, but Merck spokeswoman Maggie Beute said her company has taken additional steps to safeguard secrets in recent years, including beefing up computer security and being more vigilant about getting vendors to sign confidentiality agreements. "There's so much at stake here," she said. "Anything that shortens the life of any of our products is going to have detrimental effects on our ability to recoup our investment in R&D. As an industry, we're very focused on making sure our intellectual property rights aren't violated." Illegal intrusions such as those against Merck, Schering-Plough, and Bristol-Myers Squibb have created a cottage industry for consultants who advise companies on how to keep their secrets safe. Andy Welch, a senior consultant at KPMG Peat Marwick's risk-management practice, said business has increased tenfold in two years. Two out of three companies who come to him for help are taking preventive measures, but the others have already suffered security breaches. Welch examines personnel policies to make sure there are procedures for deactivating computer passwords when employees leave. And he attempts to hack into the company's system from the outside to find its weak links, such as the ability to dial in to a company's computer system without a password. He said many companies are not prepared to deal with the threat of corporate espionage, especially intrusions into their computer systems, where many of their most valuable secrets reside. "The indication is that there is a large degree of unpreparedness out there," Welch said. "It needs to be taken seriously. I can't tell you with a straight face that everything is warm and fuzzy out there." By Louis Lavelle -0- Visit The Record, Hackensack, N.J., on the World Wide Web at http://www.bergen.com (c) 1998, The Record, Hackensack, N.J. Distributed by Knight Ridder/Tribune Business News. BMY, MRK, SGP, WLA, JNJ, CPLY, END!A$9?HK-BIZ-ESPIONAGE News provided by COMTEX. [!BUSINESS] [!COMMUNITY] [!HEALTHCARE] [!WALL+STREET] [BIOTECHNOLOGY] [BUSINESS] [CANCER] [CHINA] [COLORADO] [COMPUTER] [CORPORATE] [DOLLAR] [E-MAIL] [ESPIONAGE] [FDA] [FLORIDA] [FOOD] [GERMANY] [GOLD] [INDIANA] [INVESTMENT] [KRT] [LAWSUIT] [MARKET] [MARKETING] [MEN] [MONEY] [NEW+BRUNSWICK] [NEW+JERSEY] [NEWS] [NEWSGRID] [PIPELINE] [PRODUCTS] [PROPERTY] [RESEARCH] [SALES] [TECHNOLOGY] [TRADE] [TURKEY] [USA] -- ----------------------- NOTE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes only. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ----------------------- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

IP: [Fwd: Govt.Storing MRE's In Caves]
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: me <bucsplace(a)cchat.com> Subject: IP: [Fwd: Govt.Storing MRE's In Caves] Date: Tue, 08 Sep 1998 08:45:42 -0400 To: IP <ignition-point(a)majordomo.pobox.com> This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------08FDE2A053FE721F529722FE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --------------08FDE2A053FE721F529722FE Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Path: news.dx.net!uunet!in5.uu.net!xmission!newsfeed.berkeley.edu!su-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.bbnplanet.com!pln-w!spln!extra.newsguy.com!newsp.newsguy.com!enews3 From: "Steve" <peach2(a)rocketmail.com> Newsgroups: misc.survivalism Subject: Re: Govt.Storing MRE's In Caves Date: 7 Sep 1998 23:00:31 GMT Organization: http://extra.newsguy.com Message-ID: <01bddab3$a25f5600$d34ae5d0(a)maddog1.camalott.com> References: <1998090721534800.RAA12052(a)ladder01.news.aol.com> Reply-To: "Steve" <maddog1(a)camalott.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: p-499.newsdawg.com X-Newsreader: Microsoft Internet News 4.70.1161 I can vouch for the existance of these caves in KC.....been by there many times in the days of my youth( lived there '56-'88). The interesting thing is the government(FED) kicked the private business's that were using them for warehousing/storage out....declaring that the caves were unsafe and dangerous. Funny thing is.....they weren't unsafe enough for the FED's to use. Steve West Texas -- "We the people are the rightful masters of both Congress and the courts, not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution." --- Abraham Lincoln "You know, of course, that this means war..." Bugs Bunny to Elmer Fudd: 1942 PAPACHUBY2 <papachuby2(a)aol.com> wrote in article <1998090721534800.RAA12052(a)ladder01.news.aol.com>... Hi, This is off the Ark list. Interesting. S. Below are two differnet notes that I received today. I took all the return paths off of these so that they can be passed around. I personally know both sources and they are EXTREMELY credible. Perhaps we can locate a source near Kansas City..to look into this (with pictures)......I am MOST curious... marie - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - name Here's the post I received yesterday from a Y2K chat friend regarding the situation. The second message is one I received today from him. He'll be keeping me posted on what else he learns. Jeff > >>>>>>>>>>>>> Yesterday's Post------- Dear friends, As some of you know, I live in a poor and working class neighborhood in kansas city, and am involved with various activities that help poor people become less poor. As part of this, I often take in people who are homeless, or would be if not for a safe harbor. One of my housemates just got a four month temporary job unloading trucks at an underground storage center located near my neighborhood (KC has a lot of underground limestone caves that are used for storage). Anyway, this particular contract is a government contract, and the product being unloaded and stored is MRE's. that is, "meal ready to eat", which i believe is the current incarnation of the old army c rations. how many mre's are on a truck? all day, 8 hours a day, for four months. that is a LOT of meals ready to eat. Note that I didn't hear this from somebody who heard from somebody, i heard this from somebody in my own household who is unloading the mres, beginning at 7:30 in the am. Three things: First, I am comforted to know that this large amount of food is being stored here locally. Second, if you have any fiends or acquaintances who do temporary labor or casual jobs, you might ask around and see if any such operations are going on in your city.Three, somebody is taking this really seriously. mre's aren't cheap. Today's Post -------------- Dear Jeff and everybody, Today they unloaded nine trucks, and then were let go early because some additional expected trucks didn't show. It takes two guys about 1-1/2 hours to unload a truck, and each gets $35. Don't know if this space has been used to store mre's before, but that's on the list of questions to scope out. It does seem to be a government contract, the supervisors seem sure of that. It has been confirmed that this is new, that is, it isn't the regular cold storage location for Ft. Leonard Wood, etc. One of the other laborers said that each truck had 3500 cases, so today there were nine trucks times 3500 cases equals 31,500 cases. Anybody know how many mre's are in a case? This would seem to be literally an enormous amount of food, as if there were six mre's in each case, that would mean 189,000 means were unloaded today alone, and today was a short day. He was called back to work at 3:30 in the afternoon, but the expected trucks still didn't arrive. Note that the laborers apparently have to +spc- a certain amount of time sitting around and waiting. Since the contract is for four months, 22 work days a month, and if today's unloading was an average work day, and there are at least six mre's per case, then we're talking a minimum of 16,632,000 mres. Any way you look at that, it is a large amount of prepared food, being tucked securely away in a limestone cavern in KCMO. It's three meals a day for 500,000 people for 11 days, and that's the low estimate, since today was deemed a slack day by those doing the labor. - - - - -- Note: this is from another source... came in after the top portion.... > >>>>>>>>>>>> I researched MRE's just this evening to learn more about them. The full meal type MRE comes 12 per case, and the case weighs 17 pounds. So, for doing some math, double the figures you were dealing with. Using Robert's math that would come to 33,264,000 meals - using 22 work days per month, for 4 months, and the light work load experienced by Robert's friend that particular day. Assuming 12 per case, that's 2,772,000 cases at 17 pounds per case equals 47,124,000 pounds of food, or 23,562 tons. That would mean you could feed 500,000 people 3 meals per day for 22.17 days or roughly 100,000 people for just over 3 months (about 111 days actually). These are large numbers indeed and we can all look forward to learning more about this. Robert, can you put the local news people on it to open it up? Would that be wise or not? I don't know, but if appropriate, it's one heck of a story they may wish to track down. God bless all of you, << End of Forwarded message >> [snip] Local Y2K Update: I received a telephone call from a highly credible source. This informant told me that government employees recently attended a Y2K meeting in Orange County. At this meeting, one of the handouts was a listing of all the Mormon Canneries. Even more disturbing was the fact, these employees were casually told not to make this public so that they could have the necessary time to acquire their long-term storage food first. --------------08FDE2A053FE721F529722FE-- ********************************************** To subscribe or unsubscribe, email: majordomo(a)majordomo.pobox.com with the message: (un)subscribe ignition-point email@address ********************************************** www.telepath.com/believer **********************************************

1 0

Taxes & baseball...
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, It occurs to me that if the fan who caught the ball and then gave it to McGyer had to pay a gift tax then so would the NLB, after all it was their ball until it left the field at which point they give it to the fan who catches it. I wonder what made the IRS back down from a cool 1.2M...? ____________________________________________________________________ The seeker is a finder. Ancient Persian Proverb The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

2 1

WebSite Professional 2.3
by techsales＠oreilly.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hello! Thank you for downloading O'Reilly's WebSite Professional 2.3. There's a ton of great stuff wrapped up in that one package, so I hope you'll invest a little time to play with it thoroughly. I'm confident you'll consider it time well spent. In fact, before long, you may just find yourself among WebSite's growing ranks of raving fans. Just like these corporations and institutions: AT&T National Cancer Institute Bear Stearns Siemens Nixdorf Boeing North America Smithsonian Institution County of Los Angeles Snap-on Tools, Inc. Hewlett-Packard Sprint Indiana University Union Pacific Railroad Intel United States Geological Survey JCPenny University of Miami Lucent Technologies Warner Brothers Motorola Yamaha Corporation If, during your trial of WebSite Pro, you have any questions about its capabilities or functionality, please contact me directly at techsales(a)oreilly.com or call 1-800-998-9938 (707-829-0515) ext. 351. To download other WebSite Professional 2.3 components you can go to: http://software.oreilly.com/download/wsp23demo_download.html To access our Knowledge Base: http://software.oreilly.com/techsupport/index_ws.html Thanks again, and have a great day! -- Michelle Koff, techsales(a)oreilly.com Technical Sales Associate O'Reilly & Associates (http://software.oreilly.com)

1 0

Re: Any good hacking sites?
by HyperReal-Anon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

On Tue, 8 Sep 1998, M I T Flunky wrote: > > hey all, Hey, d00d! What be happenin'? My homies and my bro's are just a hangin', man! We be k-rad kool, d00d! > > any1 know of any good hacking sites that teach u the basics and stuff? Find somebody who has been the attacker in a recent axe murder. He'll be more than happy to teach you the basics and stuff, I'm sure, particularly if you lock yourself in stocks first. > also, any1 here into AOL hacking??? I prefer a chainsaw, myself. It does cause a bit of a mess, but the mess is still preferable to the AOLholes like yourself. > > thanx, > ~Fallen Angel No pro', bro', ~LamenessMonger > > _____________________________________________________________________ > You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail. Apparently you don't need a clue either. > Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com Well, they don't punctuate the end of the sentence, but at least they put the protocol specifier on. > Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866] Or at (800) 6NO-CLUE. LamenessMonger

1 0

Austin: Meet on Wed. Sept. 16, 1998 (new location)
by Jim Choate 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi, The next physical meet will be held on Wed. Sept. 16, 1998 from 7-8pm (or later). We are meeting at the Korea House across the street from The Yellow Rose on N. Lamar. If you need directions please send a request to austin-cpunks(a)ssz.com. I am sure there will be some discussion about Toto as well as the database project we've been half-heartedly working on (if only work didn't take so much time). ____________________________________________________________________ The seeker is a finder. Ancient Persian Proverb The Armadillo Group ,::////;::-. James Choate Austin, Tx /:'///// ``::>/|/ ravage(a)ssz.com www.ssz.com .', |||| `/( e\ 512-451-7087 -====~~mm-'`-```-mm --'- --------------------------------------------------------------------

1 0

Netly News on Nutly News (resend)
by Declan McCullagh 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Wed, 9 Sep 1998 05:42:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Declan McCullagh <declan(a)well.com> To: politech(a)vorlon.mit.edu Subject: The Arrest of the Nutly Bomber http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/0,2326,201980909-14593,00.html TIME Digital Daily September 9, 1998 The Arrest of the Nutly Bomber By Declan McCullagh (declan(a)well.com) [Part I of a Series For two years a pair of anonymous Net crackpots have been posting angry tirades to a cryptography discussion list under a takeoff of Netly called "Nutly News." Now the FBI and Royal Canadian Mounted Police say that a digital signature connects them to a bomb discovered last June in a Canadian courthouse.] It was about 5 p.m. on August 18. Carl Johnson, 49, was beating the heat inside the Rialto Theater in what passes for downtown Tuscon, Ariz. That morning a friend had tipped off Johnson that the police were trying to find him, but for now he had something else on his mind: his music. The itinerant musician and writer had spent the last month furiously scribbling lyrics, friends say, and he wanted a loan from someone he knew who worked at the theater. It was for some recording work, Johnson explained. This was going be his third album, after "My Way or the Highway" and "Please! Stop Me Before I Sing Again." But when Johnson left the Rialto, his musical career was cut short by two federal agents from the IRS's internal security division. They arrested him on charges of Internet threats against federal judges and police. The Canadians wanted Johnson, too, on charges of planting a bomb in a Saskatchewan courthouse.

1 0

Netly News on Nutly News
by Declan McCullagh 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

http://cgi.pathfinder.com/netly/0,2326,201980909-14593,00.html The Arrest of the Nutly Bomber By Declan McCullagh (declan(a)well.com) [Part I of a Series For two years a pair of anonymous Net crackpots have been posting angry tirades to a cryptography discussion list under a takeoff of Netly called "Nutly News." Now the FBI and Royal Canadian Mounted Police say that a digital signature connects them to a bomb discovered last June in a Canadian courthouse.] It was about 5 p.m. on August 18. Carl Johnson, 49, was beating the heat inside the Rialto Theater in what passes for downtown Tuscon, Ariz. That morning a friend had tipped off Johnson that the police were trying to find him, but for now he had something else on his mind: his music. The itinerant musician and writer had spent the last month furiously scribbling lyrics, friends say, and he wanted a loan from someone he knew who worked at the theater. It was for some recording work, Johnson explained. This was going be his third album, after "My Way or the Highway" and "Please! Stop Me Before I Sing Again." But when Johnson left the Rialto, his musical career was cut short by two federal agents from the IRS's internal security division. They arrested him on charges of Internet threats against federal judges and police. The Canadians wanted Johnson, too, on charges of planting a bomb in a Saskatchewan courthouse. [...]

1 0

Checking CDR
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Those of us on cyberpass.net are not getting mail this morning so I've subbed to algebra and ssz to see if the x-posting is working.

2 1

SCADA in power grid
by Vladimir Z. Nuri 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

this is from http://www.garynorth.com/y2k/detail_.cfm/2439 Gary North's Y2K Links and Forums Summary and Comments (feel free to mail this page) ---------------------------------------------------------------- Category: Power_Grid Date: 1998-08-29 13:57:30 Subject: The Convenient Lie: Link: http://y2ktimebomb.com/PP/RC/dm9834.htm Comment: On August 27, I spoke before a meeting of 500 people -- 5% of a local town. At that meeting, representatives of several industries spoke: banking, telephone, electrical power. When pressed by someone in the audience, the representative of the power company insisted they could run the entire company on manual systems without compliant computers. Forget about noncompliant chips. The company can do it manually. I asked him straight: Can they run the SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) system without telecommunications? That's the computerized system that tells them how much power is running through the lines. "Yes," he said. A week before I had been told by an engineer with a large urban power company that without SCADA, they would fry the lines permanently. "There is no way we could run the system manually." I guess engineers don't agree. I told the audience this: "No system can be switched to pre-computer manual operations without training. Any outfit that claims that it can be run manually had better have a highly trained technical staff to take over in 2000. Does the outfit have a training manual? How much training money has it budgeted?" Any outfit that does not have the staff being trained right now is lying when it says that it can be run manually. It cannot be run manually by phantom workers. The men who knew how to run it manually were fired 30 years ago. The manual systems were replaced. The industry did not spend hundreds of billions of dollars on computerization so as to have two separate operation systems. They spent the money to get rid of manual systems. Any time you hear some representative tell you his public utility can be run manually, ask five questions: 1. How many trained personnel do you need, including substitutes, to run your system manually? 2. How many are currently undergoing training for this task, and how many have finished it? 3. May I come in and see your training manual that you use to train these people? 4. How much money has your company budgeted to train this staff? 5. How much has already been spent? You must call their bluff. They're lying. They have no intention of trying to run anything manually. It's just a PR ploy. It's Monica Lewinsky syndrome. Nobody suffers any consequences for lying to the public. But can't they be sued for lying, i.e., misleading the public? Not if all companies in the industry collapse for the same reason. They will share the blame, or pass it on to a higher authority: "An act of God." When you catch one of them in a lie this big, you can rest assured: he knows that it can't be fixed by anyone, so he knows he can't be successfully sued. Training to convert to manual systems won't work, of course. The power industry can't be run manually, and it's too late to fix the code. Besides, nobody in the industry will pay any attention to such warnings. But at least it lets the industry know that you don't believe the lie any more. Dick Mills, who is a public optimist about the power grid, recently issued a warning to the industry: begin contingency planning. This includes training. This is the best advice that anyone could give the power industry -- not because the advice could work at this late date, but because it's time to call their bluff. This is from Westergaard's site. * * * * * * * * * . . . Isn't there already a national emergency plan in place for such as critical infrastructure such as power? No, not to my knowledge. Please write and tell me if I'm wrong. Never before, has there been a threat to the power system of such sweeping scope and magnitude as Y2K. There was no need for a national electric-power emergency plan. Prudence requires that we have such a plan, not only for Y2K but also for other future threats. I foresee that this plan will need to span national, state, local, public, private, utility and non-utility boundaries. How might we accomplish that? I've been told that existing presidential executive orders allow the entire industry to be nationalized at the stroke of a pen in case of emergency. Thus the authority exists, but it will do no good unless there are plans and trained organizations in place to use it effectively. There are numerous mitigating possibilities to be considered. That is true of not only to electric power but also to all industries and all facets of the Y2K problem. . . . It is already too late to finish Y2K remediation for many companies, but it is not too late for disaster preparations. To actually get practical and practiced disaster preparedness plans in place, we must accomplish three things. I see these three as my working goals. I hope you do the same. . . . We must plan, train, and practice the implementation of emergency procedures. Those are key elements of all emergency services like fire and police. In the Y2K case, we have to combine strangers into teams, invent new roles, and practice. That takes time. Link: http://y2ktimebomb.com/PP/RC/dm9834.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------- Return to Category: Power_Grid Return to Main Categories Return to Home Page

1 0

Re: RUSSIAN DEFECTOR WARNS OF PRE-POSITIONED PORTABLE NUKES
by tcmay＠got.net 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

An interesting report from a GRU defector. How much of it is true? How much is rehashed? In any case, somebody must have cursed us, because we truly do live in interesting times. Y2K, terrorism, busts of cypherpunks, martial law contingency plans, a meltdown of Asian and Russian economies (with Latin America apparently headed down the same drain), Asama bin Laden, VX nerve gas, Ebola being developed in weapons labs, and on and on. I'm glad I live far away from safe targets and have accumulated enough supplies to "hunker" down for a long time. There are two articles here, both interesting. --Tim May In article <199809082136.VAA01195(a)earth.wazoo.com>, Anonymous <nobody(a)earth.wazoo.com> wrote: > Colonel Stanislav Lunev, Russian GRU defector talks about the BACKPACK NUKES > on KSFO, Geoff Metcalf Show > > KSFO 560 AM San Francisco, Geoff Metcalf Show > > GUEST:Colonel Stanislav Lunev, Russian GRU defector, author of "Through the > Eyes of the Enemy" > > SUMMARY OF LUNEV'S REMARKS > > Boris Yelstin is a mafia tool, an alcoholic who has not at all decreased his > habit of drinking who "cannot appear more than one hour in public or he > looses control over himself". He is a "decoration of power" controlled by > criminals and industrial tycoons who rule Russia behind the scenes. > > "Russia as Friend" is a theme slavishly pursued by breathless Western-types, > but in fact is an illusion. Only 2 months ago a large secret Soviet Air Base > conducted a very large-scale simulation of all-out nuclear with the West. A > similar exercise undertaken by Soviet Northern Fleet only 2 weeks ago. > > In case of outbreak of war (something that Lunev sees as a greater danger > NOW than at any time in the past), portable containers of chemical, > biological, and nuclear for use by Spetnaz against command and control > centers, water and air supplies, and specific individuals in a "decapitory > strike"-type scenario. > > Prior to hostilities, "students and businessmen" infiltrate into the US > using regular airlines, discard their disguises, and proceed to weapon > storage sites and then onto final targets. > > 100 of these weapons are stored outside the former Soviet Union. > > 57 main cells of industrial techno-snooping exist around the San Francisco > Bay Area. > > In February 97, Boris Yelstin gave a special order to Russian intelligence > to dramatically increase industrial espionage against the USA. Lunev > estimates that just in the last several years, espionage within America has > roughly doubled. > > Lunev indicates that China and Russia have entered into substantial, formal > cooperation in their espionage efforts against the USA. He adds that in the > outbreak of war, both countries could fight together against America. > > Metcalf closes by saying that Lunev's book can be ordered by calling > 1-888-606-0614. > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > [www.FreeRepublic.com] > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > USG Ignores Soviet Special Troops Inside Our Borders > by Neil C. Livingston and M. K. Pilgrim > > The following scenario outlining typical Spetsnaz-type operations > prior to a Soviet main-force incursion into a foreign country comes > from unclassified U.S. government documents. > > "An unconventional warefare scenario: The following hypothetical > scenario illustrates the employment concept for the full exploitation > of Soviet UW [unconventional warefare] assets. > > "In support of a coordinated attack, air-dropped or air-landed GRU > special purpose teams would be introduced into their respective target > areas some days prior to H-hour. Special KGB sabotage teams would have > been infiltrated over a longer period of time by clandestine methods > to include the use of international commercial travel. These sabotage > teams could be prepared to begin their operations well before the > enemy's rear area security apparatus can be fully alerted. In the > pre-war period, some KGB personnel will seek to undermine national > resistance through political measures. > > "Sabotage teams will begin isolated acts of sabotage such as > destroying a key bridge. In addition, KGB teams will attempt to create > chaos at major ports and distrupt communications. > > "Shortly before D-day, additional sabotage teams will be inserted and > the majority of `sleeper agents' activated. > > "Sabotage equipment can be smuggled into a country by any number of > secret methods and stored in hidden, but easily accessible, caches. > Smuggling techniques may include the offshore dropping of waterproof > containers from ships and submarines. In accordance with the > prearranged signals, they will be recovered and stored by clandestine > support personnel. > > "Sensitive or fragil equipment (electronics material, detonators, and > communication devices) can be brought into the country by diplomatic > pouch and made available to the teams through established procedures. > > "Teams will attempt tp place their explosives and incendiary devices > on the targets and set them to detonate at H-hour. All efforts will be > made to prevent association of these acts with the USSR in order to > maintain the element of surprise for the main attack. Immediately > prior to H-hour, the UW teams will prepare to: > * Locate and destroy nuclear capable weaponry. > * Jam radar installations. > * Kidnap or assassinate key political-military leadership. > * Seize or destroy radio and TV broadcasting facilities. > > "At H-hour a wide spectrum of sabotage actions will be initiated." > > > http://www.icom.net/~tachyon/military/spetsnaz.html > Soldier of Fortune > January 1988 > > SOF SOVIET SPECIAL OPS > SPETSNAZ INVADES AMERICA > USG Ignores Soviet Special Troops Inside Our Borders

2 1

If there's a trial will some of us be witnesses?
by Tim May 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

If Carl Johnson comes to trial, presumably both sides will call expert witnesses. So, who will these witnesses be? Ironically, we are almost certainly the most qualified witnesses on the planet in these issues. However, I expect we are too disreputable, to either side, to be called. Instead, they'll likely call on peripheral players like Dorothy Denning to explain to the jury what AP is. Or perhaps the "Science Applications Inc." lightweight who attempted to analyze anonymity and remailers for a conference paper a year or two ago. Food for thought. I'm not sure how I'd react if either side called on me to act as witness. And if they subpoenaed me, I suppose I'd have to spend a few kilobucks to hire some lawyer to explain to me how and when I could take the Fifth. (That's what it's come to, with lawyers needed at every stage.) --Tim May "The tree of liberty must be watered periodically with the blood of tyrants...." ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments.

2 1

Re: Carl Johnson Warrant and Complaint
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> From: Tim May <tcmay(a)got.net> > > As I'd been deleting nearly all of Toto's stuff unread, I missed all the > stuff about (allegedly) threatening to bomb the RCMP. That's probably true for most of us...it was an unbelievable volume of crap he sent the list. (as opposed to my crap ;-) > Best to leave rants at the general, protected speech level, and to not get > into specifics of names and working habits of agents. For example: # Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 22:39:01 -0700 # To: cypherpunks(a)cyberpass.net # From: Tim May <tcmay(a)got.net> # Subject: Tax silliness # # Fox News is reporting that the IRS has said it may seek to # assess "gift taxes" if the guy who recovered Mark McGwire's 61st home # baseball gives the ball back to Mark McGwire. # # Those fuckers in D. C. need to be put out of our misery. Yeah, much better, Tim. ;-) But don't start holding rallies and saying it in public in NYC, or Rudolph Giuliani might have you arrested. ---- http://jya.com/usa-v-cej-wc.htm > 8. On December 9, 1997, an anonymous message was posted to the > Cypherpunks Internet mail group with the subject listed as "Encrypted > InterNet DEATH THREAT!!! / ATTN: Ninth District Judges / PASSWORD: > sog"[.] The body of the message was encrypted with the publicly > available encryption software PGP, and was initially unreadable. Using > PGP software and the password shown in the subject line of the > message, I was able to decrypt the message, which contained a > rambling, five-page statement, including the following: That would appear to be this post: http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/dir.97.12.04-97.12.10/msg00356.html Entirely unexplained is how one goes from passphrase "sog" (Shit on government?) to decrypting the PGP message. What public or private key was used? > 9. I noted that this message contained a PGP digital signature. From > my training and experience, I am aware that this digital signature is > used as a way to authenticate digital documents to make sure that they > are authored by the purported author and that no one has tampered with > them. When I checked the signature using only PGP software, the PGP > program was unable to identify it. What key...? > Only July 1, 1998, Royal Canadian > Mounted Police (RCMP) Investigator Steve Foster provided me with a PGP > "Secret Key Ring" which he stated he had obtained from a computer > which Canadian Customs authorities had seized from an individual by > the name of CARL EDWARD JOHNSON. [A "secret key ring" is a > user-generated code which allows for the encryption (and later > authentication) of computer-generated documents.] When I checked the > digital signature on the Internet death threat using the PGP software > and JOHNSON'S secret key ring, the computer identified the signature > as one of the signature keys stored in JOHNSON'S computer. Because > both the "private" and "public" portions of the "key" were stored on > JOHNSON'S computer, the message can be authenticated as having been > generated by the person who possessed this "secret key" and knew the > correct password. In other words, only the person possessing the > secret key found on JOHNSON'S computer could have generated the "death > threat" message. Sparky got it wrong. Many people could have the same public/secret key pairs, all they have to do is give them out. And you don't authenticate messages with the "secret key" in standard use. This person seems to have no clue, after months of tracking, how basic public key encryption software works. In fact, the key ring could be edited to have a fake secret key and the public key that works as the digital signature for the posted message. More questions: did they get the passphrase for his computer's PGP secret key? How? And why did RCMP customs seize his computer? ---guy

1 0

PGP5.5.5 Problem
by Jim Van Over 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I am seeking assistance with a PGP 5.5.5 system and noting your comments on the net I thought it might be possible for you to help me with a solution. I have been using PGP5.5.5, successfully, for the past four months. However, beginning three days ago I began experiencing a problem. I am using Netscape Navigator and the Netscape Message Center. The problem: When I receive a PGP message I copy it to the clipboard, but, when I depress the "decrypt and verify" line on the PGP tool bar the screen for the "pass phrase" flashes briefly on the screen and disappears. The same thing happens when I use the PGP tools. The PGP tool bar first referred to is the lock icon at the bottom of the screen. I have compared my public key with the key from which I receive messages and they are identical. I am able to encrypt a message to myself and then decrypt it without any problem. It is only when I receive a message from my other computer does the problem exist. I would very much appreciate any ideas you may have as how to correct this problem. Please make your solution as basic as possible as I am not as "computer literate" as I need to be in order to understand most explanations. Thank You Jim Van Over

2 1

The full Monica: Novel new 'service'/Collectors' issue - New interface tomorrow
by STUFFED NEWS DAILY 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Today is the last day using the current interface. After much research we designed a new front end along the lines of what many of you had been asking for. And it's turned out to be super-fast too. That's tomorrow's issue. But for today, here's what you also get! + 30+ FREE HI-RES JPEGS + PAGE 2 'SPREAD': A GORGEOUS GAL + RAUNCHY RECIPE: CRAFTY COOK + LA WINDSKY: AMAZING MODEL + KEEP IT IN THE FAMILY: STRANGE ENCOUNTER + CLINTON CONDOMS: YES IT'S TRUE + ASS-PIRIN: SEX AND DRUGS + WILD THUMBNAILS: 10 FREE PICS + SEXY STORY: "THE GROUPIE" + THE VERY BEST OF EUREKA! - YOUR FAVORITE SITES + SEXY SURPRISE THUMBS: 10 MORE FREE PICS + FOOD FOR SEX: FASCINATING FEATURE + MEGA THUMBNAIL ORGY: ANOTHER 10 FREE PICS + ULTRA HI-RES POSTER PIC: SAVE IT, PRINT IT + LOADS AND LOADS MORE STUFF: CHECK IT OUT! - Have fun! ----> http://stuffed.net/98/9/9/ <---- Welcome to today's issue of Stuffed. To read it you should click on the URL above. If it is not made clickable by your email program you will need to use your mouse to highlight the URL, copy it and then paste it into your browser (then press Return). This email is never sent unsolicited. Stuffed is the supplement for the Eureka newsletter you subscribed to. Full instructions on unsubscribing are in every issue of Eureka! ----> http://stuffed.net/98/9/9/ <----

1 0

Re: Any good hacking sites?
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

M I T wrote: > ... > also, any1 here into AOL hacking??? > Oh, this is almost _too_ easy... Yeah, we know about AOL hacking... First, you get a couple of million clueless fucktards like yourself together and give all of them the same 800-number to dial in... Watch what follows: <closeup of two fuckholes; if breathing weren't an autonomic response, they'd both be dead> bzzzt... bzzzt... bzzzt... <fx: busy signal> Lamer #1: "Hey, d00d, whatcha doin?" bzzzt... bzzzt... bzzzt... Lamer #2: "I'm hacking AOL, man." bzzzt... bzzzt... bzzzt... Lamer #1: "Whoa! C00l, d00d! Can I like, watch?" bzzzt... bzzzt... bzzzt... Lamer #2: "Sure, man." <cut to screen showing WinBlows "Starfield Simulation" screensaver> ... Any questions?

1 0

Re: Carl Johnson Warrant and Complaint
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Why would you claim only one person possessed the secret key? As you > doubtlessly know, some of the TruthMonger secret keys have been posted > to Cypherpunks anonymously. This is not authentication. Thank you. Prove it. Post the archived message where these secret keys were posted. Let's see the one which signed: http://www.inet-one.com/cypherpunks/dir.97.12.04-97.12.10/msg00356.html Note to the clueless guy(a)panix.com, who asks: > Entirely unexplained is how one goes from passphrase "sog" (Shit on government?) > to decrypting the PGP message. I'm impressed. You're actually stupider than Jeff Gordon, the IRS flunky. He was able to figure it out, so why don't you try. Ask your kindergarten teacher to give you a gold star once you fumble your way to the answer.

1 0

Re: Citizenship silliness. Re: e$: crypto-expatriatism
by Petro 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 11:52 AM -0500 9/9/98, William H. Geiger III wrote: >In <v03110703b21c4777ca38(a)[206.189.103.244]>, on 09/09/98 > at 09:58 AM, Petro <petro(a)playboy.com> said: >>At 11:25 PM -0500 9/8/98, William H. Geiger III wrote:>>>In >><v03110710b21b6a259806(a)[206.189.103.244]>, on 09/08/98 >>> at 06:17 PM, Petro <petro(a)playboy.com> said: >>>> No, more like a get off our fucking land. >>>Sure thing, and where you live, exactly who's land was it before you got >>>there? >> Point is, the "Arabs" didn't start it, the UN/European leaders (US, UK, >>FR, and RU) did. >Both the Palestinians and the Jews living in Trans-Jordan wanted their own >country. The UN resolution divided up the land based on population and >gave each group their own country. Israel declared their independence, the >Palestinians listened to the Grand Mufti and join in the holy war to wipe >out the Jews. The Arabs lost, too bad, game over. > >And interesting note to the whole palestinian "issue" is that the majority >of the population of Jordan is palestinian!! And long before the Intifada >the PLO tried to take over the government of Jordan and were embroiled in >civil war for most of the 60's and early 70's. The Jordanian Arabs finally >kick the PLO out in the early 70's (71 maybe 72). > > >> If I move you off your property at the point of a gun, should I expect >>you to _like_ it, even if I gave you what I consider "fair market value"? > >This re-wright of history might give you warm fuzzies but no one was moved >at gun point off their land (at least not until the Arabs started the >war). The Jews that emigrated to Trans-Jordan/Palestine *purchased* the >land from the Arabs that were living there. Even after the war the >majority of palestinians left on their own. Ok, I'm rewriting history, you say IN THE SAME POST: The UN resolution divided up the land based on population and gave each group their own country. --and-- The Jews that emigrated to Trans-Jordan/Palestine *purchased* the land from the Arabs that were living there. So tell me, is there a difference between being _told_ you will sell your house and move, and deciding you really would prefer to live elsewhere? Oh, and when this artifical coutry was set up, did EVERYONE have equal say in the government, or were certain Northern Europeans of jewish faith considered more equal. Of course, being given the short end of the political and economic stick couldn't be considered an incitement. >None of the current Arab countries existed until the British carved up >their conquered territory after WWI. If Israel is not "legitimate" because >of UK/UN involvement does it follow that all of the Arab states that were >formed at this time are also illegitimate? Perhaps we should should The region was carved up using an existing population, not by importing one from a different country. Like Mr. May, I have no problems with anyone who wants to live anywhere in peace and co-existence. The Israeli government is not interested in that, if it were politically possible, they'd do the same to the Palistanians as the Germans tried to do to them. >I find it quite hypocritical of Americans who see the Israelites as >occupiers and oppressors but would be outraged at calls to give back the >south-west to Mexico. Tim, you want to give your ranch to some Mexican >family since the Americans took that land from them? but then the mexicans >would have to give that land back to some deserving "native" Americans as >they took that land from them. But then again we would have to sift >through the thousands of years of tribal warfare and migration to find the >one true owners of the land. You seem to be saying that Conquest by Force Of Arms is acceptable, then the PLO is still trying to take back what they lost. petro(a)playboy.com----for work related issues. I don't speak for Playboy. petro(a)bounty.org-----for everthing else. They wouldn't like that. They REALLY Economic speech IS political speech. wouldn't like that.

2 1

question...
by Bernardo B. Terrado 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

What is the TEMPEST? (just an overview) What do enciphered images look like? Thank you. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Some people they might say that I'm hard to get to know. I go my own sweet way, well that maybe so. Something about the crowd that makes me walk alone. I never had a need in me to be the party's life and soul. It's me Bernie. metaphone(a)altavista.net ``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````

1 0

Cypherpunks as a Continuing Criminal Enterprise?
by Tim May 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Could our group be charged as a "continuing criminal enterprise" under the RICO statute? It occurs to me that if Carl Johnson, who is linked several times to our group/list in the court documents, is successfully prosecuted,then the Feds may be able to cite both Bell and Johnson as evidence of a conspiracy. Which probably wouldn't be too hard to prove, as many of us have admitted to conspiring mightily to undermine various institutions. (And we even use encypted e-mail, the very essence of a secret conspiracy.) It might be fun to see them try this. Would they charge some of us as ringleaders? Or would they declare the entity itself an illegal organization? (As they have done with various cultural, political, and even religous groups, like Hezbollah, the Aum religion, etc.) Interesting times. --Tim May "The tree of liberty must be watered periodically with the blood of tyrants...." ---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---------:---- Timothy C. May | Crypto Anarchy: encryption, digital money, ComSec 3DES: 408-728-0152 | anonymous networks, digital pseudonyms, zero W.A.S.T.E.: Corralitos, CA | knowledge, reputations, information markets, Licensed Ontologist | black markets, collapse of governments.

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - September 9, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

CTIAs Daily News From WOW-COM was not circulated yesterday and today because of a wireline telephone system failure that is disrupting service to the Cellular Telecommunications Industry Association building in Washington, D.C. We regret the inconvenience this may have caused you and look forward to resuming the Daily News service as soon as possible.

1 0

Re: Carl Johnson's private key
by jimg＠mentat.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Declan skribis: > I make that point in my article, but have not seen truthmonger's private > key posted. Care to forward it to me? I stopped paying attention to most of Truthmonger's spew, but did collect one private key it posted, under the name "Earmonger", since I was doing PGP experiments at the time. I think this one doesn't have an associated passphrase, which would make forging with it quite simple. I sort of think more of its private keys were posted, but I didn't keep any others. This does, however, establish a pattern of behavior suggesting it didn't keep private keys strictly private. IIRC many of TM's messages were simply file-encrypted with an openly posted passphrase, which doesn't take a rocket scientist to crack. Jim Gillogly -------------------------------------------- Earmonger key, clipped last year: -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: PGP for Personal Privacy 5.0 mQENAzZsmI4AAAEIANHHMhV7V8WqPO6RjjfhZbeY/e6hsjAjKckU7YAYPhHiJfqG xw5+PgVjRPhIpXEE8ksmzZBzyH5KLW5GKFJZoD6YvVUSuzm+Gpxv+G78sBDBljUt BUoaB0XM4HSjEuqZtRtva+l+MAr3tFrK8FSdCsSgjQa8oOT5yFE76hgOGOkXGDKC HAISINKdduNsp4PU6HiNoKMdYpCCvK5u08lQFcByare2yaYmawYLmCzheCWLv9F/ kvnFtXCjup/pQNcOVeb/FkDx42l4vMwiWTH+AvrsjsV1njUIi9DTmcmD4doPlzBS qgbvQiTa16T2E4wJlnmATuW3QdwuBbdT2FSgj3MABRG0F0Vhck1vbmdlciA8ZW1A ZGV2Lm51bGw+iQEVAwUQNmyYjgW3U9hUoI9zAQHjNgf+KIDuWoBvfUj4H1twHvYU +IeDWIApLDnHkR7tsalLi9jY345iAolt3a/CiYxXPtjy9yedSaKoPasuvQk2cZ6e LZZwgEfDYj1GvjLC9D1rSItLLl6aDqYfhN2D2wgnB4mJssx1NP9zLQRf8aJkbDnl BMy3kfTr6ANmwe1hRGFWiuLkhnEtKzc9TFxBtx+4bx66rBBTzSUBfynH35bCLHLw hVzWGc5A0F18LG2WRLbGa/LcEXjp35jHyrJV73t2gUwVjH5qGa0B5O0dpvK9yDR9 wutFrmuhRgfqHO5Tclp470dkQFJv6HHMrSYyjRFFtyC9A+5Fvd1WkW7oLRAUxZmm HZkBogQ0i2ULEQQA17gNRCXxoQBVQVD+zukbAWtxMCio0tfXEJYPN516KNT7noeK dA4Q+TItlf8uC6VkUkUwabIueLZwvykDo83tnupSkvxEQ/EftLpm56kBIrgWprJM f0rIhFpIR0mNiT8ZH3z7OCAcQrfSCowk//4iESLLW8H0tFx5B9bPXrrrnkcAoP88 aezjfDn3DMlloJP9hNgRgvplA/0TKu4o2DNdIFAp/xeZE2R6wxrPfPfV00xNTgXe 5xXS3rCEljz48q6DEymmvA+oFuszKcrgOVDMT1TcKE1MzPjeKoe3c4Di92X+FoGa IenXHQrmfn7uUo54twYFqp8VsHgtfsg3F8KfFg/znF5BrIVq+aXQF9m/LczcObRz IXceEQQAhKvUfNYfP7NKA7sGkV38iFi8iJxsvkMk3RvlG6IxV0d3ATCRcvAFYUV3 fyap+CS0UnoBGZUmmIY5EvC2KyI9h8X+AXPymgM4JeQ2Hg7DnEXMegFwJ3iK9+Cg KlTS/R/h8qYUW5G1qYgYBU+JQ3I2wxmeaVWBBtYM0Rukppz+F5G0F0Vhck1vbmdl ciA8ZW1AZGV2Lm51bGw+iQBLBBARAgALBQI0i2ULBAsDAQIACgkQJH46DXlIPur3 KACgn/XD/dT+BvqkoDk1dOrbbdd00z0AnAqTYWdIKb1HkKf7Sfetwh/vKCXHuQIN BDSLZQsQCAD2Qle3CH8IF3KiutapQvMF6PlTETlPtvFuuUs4INoBp1ajFOmPQFXz 0AfGy0OplK33TGSGSfgMg71l6RfUodNQ+PVZX9x2Uk89PY3bzpnhV5JZzf24rnRP xfx2vIPFRzBhznzJZv8V+bv9kV7HAarTW56NoKVyOtQa8L9GAFgr5fSI/VhOSdvN ILSd5JEHNmszbDgNRR0PfIizHHxbLY7288kjwEPwpVsYjY67VYy4XTjTNP18F1dD ox0YbN4zISy1Kv884bEpQBgRjXyEpwpy1obEAxnIByl6ypUM2Zafq9AKUJsCRtMI PWakXUGfnHy9iUsiGSa6q6Jew1XpMgs7AAICCAC9H3enQ+6tZvcA5cjF3M2nTFCS IjerrQsQ5MZJ1EWYYhkgYkUQwtfuYL4NU/PelIo1TdYBr4mbNzxwJMFZ22cDNiOn J9oUhfDJyTA4yOacTxgl/wAXFD1FElzrVjlkf6TKW4+Db1elApcFbTDSvLNRPQev rtIrNRR480AtI8Um76RySrl9okI5L7TvtAXZMQnuyTtyA+YeG2/FvE3cOIY7EFXg Zm/jPGw6ijsbATKh6dsnb8f8dahB4awsTAzz0Unzx49TCUk0AdU9jbdP+8i+g9eJ uodZhd71d2o7HyhAwkVNKcsu5nqpFzwAWK5xSy5x1AprWWrTiu6uiAQ6T5Q/iQBG BBgRAgAGBQI0i2ULAAoJECR+Og15SD7qKaAAn0gbCIF0XzBifU27o9N7x4RI/IUX AJ49fXSrtX0w17W0gCe7BCvjXkRP7Q== =SVmn -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-----

4 3

RE: radio net (fwd)
by Matthew James Gering 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

So much for "no domestic crypto restrictions." I really hate when people say that, there are plenty, and export restrictions on cryptography software and cryptography in software DOES indirectly but substantially affect the availability and cost of domestic encryption, not to mention that most people download export-grade crypto from the web for convenience. Isn't there a similar ban on encryption-capable telephones and other electronic devices (other than computers). Matt > > The FCC prohibits the transmission of encrypted data via > > analog or digital signals by amateurs.

6 6

RE: question...
by Harvey Rook (Exchange) 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi Bernardo; TEMPEST isn't a cipher, but a technique. Essentially, your monitor is a great big RF emitter. As it's electron gun turns off and on to make the phosphor screen glow, it's emitting all kinds of radio frequencies that betray the image on the screen. A tempest attack is a receiver that can tune to a monitor, and reconstruct the image from the RF the monitor is emitting. Supposedly such equipment costs about $500.00 Harvey "Know it All" Rook. > -----Original Message----- > From: Bernardo B. Terrado [mailto:bbt@mudspring.uplb.edu.ph] > Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 1998 11:03 PM > To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com > Subject: question... > > > What is the TEMPEST? (just an overview) > > What do enciphered images look like? > > > > Thank you. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > Some people they might say that I'm hard to get to know. > I go my own sweet way, well that maybe so. > Something about the crowd that makes me walk alone. > I never had a need in me to be the party's life and soul. > > It's me Bernie. > metaphone(a)altavista.net > `````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````` > ```````````````` > > >

1 0

Re: Cypherpunks as a Continuing Criminal Enterprise?
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> From: Tim May <tcmay(a)got.net> > > Could our group be charged as a "continuing criminal enterprise" under the > RICO statute? OH GAWD PLEASE SOMEBODY SHUT DOWN THE MAY RANT-BOT! ---guy ;-)

1 0

Re: Carl Johnson Warrant and Complaint
by Information Security 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> From: Anonymous <nobody(a)replay.com> > > Note to the clueless guy(a)panix.com, who asks: > > Entirely unexplained is how one goes from passphrase "sog" (Shit on government?) > > to decrypting the PGP message. > > I'm impressed. You're actually stupider than Jeff Gordon, the IRS flunky. > He was able to figure it out, so why don't you try. Ask your kindergarten > teacher to give you a gold star once you fumble your way to the answer. Nice shot: your feet are now on fire. ---guy

1 0

Re: Carl Johnson's private key
by Jim Gillogly 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Adam skribis: > That was just a public key, though right? Was a corresponding private > key posted? Oh, you're right. I misremembered. This was actually two public keys, an RSA and an ElGamal. Still, I'm pretty sure there was a *Monger private key posted <some> time. Jim Gillogly

1 0

A Cypherpunk Trial, Yes
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Adam Back wrote: >The collection of Toto's keys that he did post and the date he posted >might be useful to archive at jya.com so that we can see which if any >of Gordon's claims of proof of authentic Toto messages are valid. Yes, this is a crucial point. The innuendo of the complaint needs checking, and read with a heap of salt, although it's probable that the Feds have more than revealed so far. They've more fanciful stories to spiel of the confabulous material of the Mounties and Estevan Bombies, and SS agents and bunkered magistrates and imperiled Cindys needing protection from the Killer Bots. To hawk tickets we have added links within the complaint to all the Cpunk messages cited, but for those who don't want to download it again or search the archives, here they are chronologically: http://jya.com/jg062397.htm http://jya.com/jg090497.htm http://jya.com/jg120997.htm http://jya.com/jg121497.htm http://jya.com/jg060898.htm (not June 10, as in the complaint; thanks to jeff-anon) http://jya.com/jg072598.htm http://jya.com/jg072798.htm It was a pleasure to reread Toto(s)'s stuff while searching the cpunk amazing archives -- what a waterfall from everyone of free association, tants, jibes, potshots and richochets and self-mockery. I now believe the report from TX that Carl's got an IQ off the charts like all cpunks off the wall. It's worth keeping in mind that multiple users of pseudonyms is not unusual, at least among artists long before the Internet, and not only performance group e-mailers like the Totos, CJ Parkers, XxxMongers, Gus-Peters and endless Anonymees jostling for unrecognition. Two venerable and heavily-used nyms in Europe are Luther Bissett and Monty Cantsin. A dazzling Monty Cantsin posted here for a while. A Luther Bissett message ridiculing the recent kiddie porn sweep was posted to Cyberia a few days ago. But these pseudonyms and others are frequently used to taunt uptight authoritarians by substantial numbers of people, sometimes acting in concert but most often acting alone. An exemplary case of acting up like the Totos and other performance pseudo-Feynmann's here, is that of Dario Fo, the Italian artist who recently won the Nobel Prize. His off the chart genius, too, was in mixing the real and imaginary to challenge, and to frighten, authority into revealing their treacherous deception of the real and imaginary to maintain state and religious control century after century, culture after culture. He, too, was regularly condemned by those obsesses with holding onto power, and sometimes arrested, for his imitations of them at their most buffoonish and serious. Fo is from an earlier generation, though, and what more agressively offensive form is suitable for those younger we may be witnessing in the Jim Bells, Unknown Arrestees, and those here not yet projected onto the world stage but working the crowd most effectively. Black Unicorn, step up to the mike. Show magic. In any, case, I'm delighted to see Cypherpunks get credit in the Johnson pseudo-complaint for hosting transgressive art appropriate for the age of widespreading disinformation. A tumultous trial to amplify this forum's mayhemic virtues and vices would be magnificently chaotic and hopefully anarchic to the max. Pray for CJ to get an equally mad attorney to demand his day, and our day, in court. This under-recognized witness is eager for a highly offensive part to play, a gibbering idiot like Toto(s), you bet, I admire their style of spleen and threat to the fools of seriousness.

3 2

SSZ is Down
by Wayne Walker 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

I'm sending this for Jim (ravage(a)ssz.com) as he is a bit too busy just now. He just arrived at home to find the dog pinned under the tree that fell and took out the phones and the ISDN. The dog is apparently uninjured (though only two feet from certain death). Don't know which dog. The ISDN is hurt and probably won't be up till sometime tomorrow. Later, Wayne -- Wayne Walker Austin, Texas E-mail wwalker(a)pobox.com "Real Programmers don't document, if it was hard to program it should be hard to use"

1 0

No Subject
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Mr Gordon, When I checked the digital signature on the Internet death threat using the PGP software and JOHNSON'S secret key ring, the computer identified the signature as one of the signature keys stored in JOHNSON'S computer. Because both the "private" and "public" portions of the "key" were stored on JOHNSON'S computer, the message can be authenticated as having been generated by the person who possessed this "secret key" and knew the correct password. In other words, only the person possessing the secret key found on JOHNSON'S computer could have generated the "death threat" message. Why would you claim only one person possessed the secret key? As you doubtlessly know, some of the TruthMonger secret keys have been posted to Cypherpunks anonymously. This is not authentication. Thank you.

3 2

Your new password
by sixdegrees 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Name: Joe Cypherpunk sixdegrees password: tapesilk Congratulations Joe. You're well on your way to becoming a full sixdegrees(tm) member. Here is your member password: tapesilk. Use it to log-in on the home page at the sixdegrees Web site, http://www.sixdegrees.com. We'll ask you for a little more information to complete your registration, and then you'll be ready to start networking. It's important that you return to the site and log-in. Your membership will not be complete until you do so. Once you've successfully logged in with your password, just go to Personal Profile and you'll be able to choose your own password. Thanks for becoming part of sixdegrees. We're looking forward to seeing you at the site. ==================================================================== PLEASE NOTE: All replies to this address are processed by a computer. If you believe you received this e-mail in error, and it was not your intention to become a sixdegrees member, or if you have any problems, questions or requests send an e-mail to issues(a)sixdegrees.com and someone will get back to you as soon as possible. ==================================================================== E.SI.BAM.1

1 0

more keys
by Adam Back 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

OK here's some more keys: [1] for "Magic Circle" [2] for "Necessarily Knott, ME" Again were these keys used to sign anything interesting? Key [1] was preceeded, perhaps meaningfully by this text in the long (22k) Epilogue 5: : Now: : : Go home, kick your fucking door in, place a disk in the floppy drive, and : type 'pgp -kxa "My KeyID" a:\secring.asc secring.pgp'. : Mail the disk to Louis J. Freeh : : Does your copy of PGP ask for a password before spitting out the KeyID : to any one of a thousand monkeys who sits at your keyboard and : randomly types in the above? : : My copy doesn't. : : Below is a copy of a key pulled off of my computer by 19 different people. : : It was pulled off of my hard drive by the first individual, who : proceeded to inform a second individual of the method used, and : challenged them to do the same thing, using a different method. The : second did so, and passed all the information along to a third person, : etc., etc. : : Nineteen people, nineteen different methods. if Toto apparently speaks in parables, and via fiction etc. is he saying that the RCMP or someone else pulled his keys off his computers? How does this correlate with his posts on the subject of hassles with the RCMP, and confiscation of some of his machines? Adam [1] ====================================================================== This one has userid: Magic Circle -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.2 lQHgAzHiUJEAAAEEAP1slPSwrVd90NVBqfsw6+JP64icmuSrztzyCgaPcXHRiy/J Kbgi9/gy1iCnWcQh1ATaSzblATSU24Xw+4Ow4s5xOvdxFGoIop6EXwTNfwRa2EZr 6ZZ41Glr9g1g9H0RJwJlkldUcunVNekXel1MYA8VJJynvtZVuntA11SbF0AdAAUT Ab7sJWrM/6azA/vV2wq4sdyfngUgUHq8Hlo5NHvEjyh2cSoMMNxnpKR3+XYRbYTd HhwfbOvji1cWnVJF6GBxe3nLvbkbHJU+K3hNNYOT9JKMahu+5wKMbHkwToSsLzyQ kgn2JlKDJugoycdjInlQs7NiyoOrIYWQzSi4yGbhl2t1Au+67UY/r57J9AIA8V/6 J5x1wH7MACSWU91jXXxpJvSud053nrSgnupEUbFX3dXm0GXf6vdhbQW9eYsIJmCI pZLrqwBcFe2GWhk9AAIActyoxAgCvFyGSJHHzJVVoKfWk/gjmKs/r7+J9vWnBAkc Pg0wqUn66Hmq0op28gEXU3qKJiJ8rAQETAxBhfpnJgH83CrrEZDcBY8IKsFI2A19 KahohyDXmsEHIWqKZLSwzjsYcf049RCUxNDPJZchuoMEPkK9414KyPqlJbStsFaE YZ6itAxNYWdpYyBDaXJjbGU=3D =3DGEo6 -----END PGP MESSAGE----- and it was posted in a message dated 20 Oct. 97 with Subject: InfoWar Epilogue 5 / TEXT ====================================================================== [2] ====================================================================== -----BEGIN PGP MESSAGE----- Version: 2.6.2 lQD4AzRmZWoAAAECAMnJrqd/TERCLeFscdgNvwVxrVG4tRm0VThMEXXkctCGMaUD jcETxcV0ZseRUcyUKfqlLd3CRsIwClozlWHHR7EABREAAfwJ5D1Ecilit/Mwsn4N GcWZXWpg3mM6/Epzs2pEhi3I926ZiWPB1DKmdZR4nVemsnwv47SWLJyCnE4sben5 h8oHAQDTFaJDJSN7+9NToOE4NFiruAXXMIHEQ6ZH21oW1sYSiwEA9LmhvfahDVKo 1/CMtxxozAtG8rWycBYVIVrkDKiVgjMBAKeB2VY/f7tzmv7KxUUtN9607+CQlWPp E3HBLTlwtuRAUxC0FU5lY2Vzc2FyaWx5IEtub3R0LCBNRQ== =caeb -----END PGP MESSAGE----- posted in a message dated 10 Nov. 97 with Subject: Key Signing ====================================================================== Adam

1 0

No Subject
by Jrjeffro＠aol.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

HaCkaZ OnlY Da EliTe HelLO YaLL DiS is Da MaDD AAOOLL HaCka Ima startin a GreWp fOR HaCs Only So In OthA WerDS yA gOttA KnOw The WAreZ anD HoW toO UsEr FaTe AnD AOL So MaIl Or Im Me FoR Da TeTaIls If YeR LeeTo K Pe@CE FrOmE The LeeTs HacK JeFFrO) >

1 0

Re: Text Analysis and Shakespeare
by cicho＠free.polbox.pl 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Vladimir Z. Nuri wrote: >a friend gave me a book called "the cryptographic >shakespeare" in which he found some patterns in >shakespearean texts that might tend to suggest >some codes were embedded in it. In what sense? Most of the time, plain old lit analysis is looking for "keys" and then applying them to "unlock" the "hidden message". An allegory is a simple substitution cipher, and then it goes all the way up to lit equivalents of one time pads and steganography (say, 'Lolita' or Frank O'Hara's poetry). Concerning Shakespeare, I thought those involved in this discussion might be amused by the following. I would have posted it earlier but didn't have the book at hand, and then Lem's prose isn't particularly friendly for the translator. It's all taken out of context, but will speak for itself, I am sure. -------------- STANIS&Lstrok;AW LEM DIARY FOUND IN A BATHTUB (chapter IV, excerpt) Here goes, I said at last, opening my eyes. My ears have yet not drunk a hundred words of that tongue's utterance, yet I know the sound. Art thou not Romeo? Fine. The captain punched keys briskly, typing in the line I offered. A slot that looked like an ancient letterbox began spitting out paper ribbon which spun slowly in the air. Captain Prandtl held it gently and handed it to me. I held the tip of the ribbon, waiting patiently. The paper snaked out of the slot inch by inch and when I tugged at it carefully I could feel the feeding mechanism vibrate. Suddenly, the barely perceptible tremor ceased and the ribbon spun on, blank. I held it to my eyes. BAS TARD MAT HEWS BAS TARD DRAW HIM & QUARTER WITH HOLY DE LIGHT MAT HEWS PIG SEED MATH HEWS MATH. And what is this? I asked, not even trying to conceal my dismay. The captain nodded. I presume that when he wrote the scene, Shakespeare was unfavourably disposed towards a man named Mathews. . . and encoded the sentiment in the lines of his play. You expect me to believe that? Do you mean to say that he deliberately filled this wondrous, lyrical passage with crude interjections at some Mathews person? I never said he did so deliberately. A code is a code, no matter what the authors intent. Do you mind? I asked. I approached the control panel and keyed in the freshly obtained plaintext myself. The ribbon moved again, twisting into a spiral. I caught a brief, peculiar smile on Prandtls lips, but he didnt say a word. THAT ASS YEAH HER ASS FUN FAT ASS FUN FAT YEAH ASS HER ASS HEY THAT FAT ASS - read the tidily printed syllables. What is this? I demanded. What is it?! Another layer. Well, what did you expect? Weve exposed a deeper layer of the psyche of a 17th century Englishman, plain and simple. This cannot be! Youre telling me this beautiful poem is nothing but a vessel to conceal some pigs and asses?! And that if you feed the most sublime literary achievements, pinnacles of human genius, immortal epics, sagas - it will all come out hodgepodge? Hodgepodge it is, mister. Art... literature... do you realise what their purpose is? To divert attention! From what? You dont know? I dont. Thats too bad. You ought to know. What are you doing here, then?! I didnt answer. With skin on his face taut like a tents canvas stretched over sharp rocks, he continued in monotone: A broken code remains a code. Under the eye of a professional cryptographer it will shed one moult after another. It is inexhaustible. It has no end nor bottom. You can delve into progressively deeper, progressively more arcane strata, but this journey never terminates. -------------- (This 1960 novel is available in English translation, hopefully better than my attempt here, as "Diary Found in a Bathtub", though i *really* should be called The (Original) Puzzle Palace, 'coz that's what it's about. It's Kafka plus David Lynch plus TCMay rolled in one :) .marek -- General Frenetics, Discorporated: http://www.lodz.pdi.net/~eristic/

1 0

Joe Cypherpunk
by sixdegrees 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Name: Ivan Cypherpunk E-Mail Address: cypherpunks(a)algebra.com sixdegrees Password: listhome Hi. You've been sponsored as "Significant Other" by Joe Cypherpunk as part of something called sixdegrees, one of the fastest growing phenomena on the Web, located at http://www.sixdegrees.com You may have already heard of the six degrees of separation concept - where everyone on the planet is connected to each other through fewer than 6 people. Well, we haven't quite connected the whole world yet, but there are over a million people participating, and over 900,000 of them are connected in one giant chain. And, just by confirming your relationship with Joe, you can instantly tap into this interconnected community of interesting people from all over the world. So what? Well, by getting connected, you can come to the Web site (which is completely FREE) and use a whole variety of valuable, fun and intriguing services that make use of this massive chain of connections. You can come see who's logged on the site right now and when you find someone interesting, we'll show you exactly how you're connected no matter how many degrees it takes, and then you can instant message them. You can also find out how you're connected to that head of personnel at the big firm where you've been trying to get your foot in the door. You can chat with people from around the globe and then see who you know in common. You can post burning questions on your own personalized bulletin board and get valuable answers from your "circle" (your friends and friends of friends). You can even get Movie recommendations from the people you're connected to. So, stop by the site at http://www.sixdegrees.com to learn more and give it a try. (You can log in with this password: listhome). ==================================================================== You can also get things started and get yourself connected right from this e-mail: ** To confirm your relationship with Joe, just send a reply that says only CONFIRM on the first line of the message body * To deny this particular relationship (but keep open the possibility of joining sixdegrees if the concept intrigues you) send a reply that says only DENY * And, if you'd like to make sure you don't hear from us again (even if somebody else you know lists you as a contact) then simply send a reply which says REMOVE in the SUBJECT LINE so we can process your request right away Thanks, and we look forward to seeing you at sixdegrees. ==================================================================== And, if you're really ambitious, you can get your network of connections growing right away. Just list the people you think might be interested in participating in sixdegrees and we'll contact them with an e-mail like this one which mentions your name and invites them to join. Just follow these directions: * Click your mail program's REPLY button. * On the FIRST line of the message body of the reply e-mail that opens, type only the word CONFIRM to let us know that you are in fact Joe's Significant Other. * On the next line of the message body list the first and last names and e-mail addresses of the people you'd like to invite (you can list as many as you'd like - but we recommend you list at least two), and the relationship numbers that correspond with how those people are related to you. MAKE SURE: * That the first name, last name, e-mail address and relationship number are separated by SEMI-COLONS. * You follow the format of these examples: John; Smith; jsmith(a)fakeplace.com; 12 Jane; Doe; superjane(a)fakeplace.com; 3 * And that you define each relationship by choosing a number from this list: 1=wife 2=husband 3=life partner 4=significant other 5=mother 6=father 7=sister 8=brother 9=daughter 10=son 11=other family member 12=friend 13=employer 14=employee 15=co-worker 16=client 17=service provider 18=business contact 19=fellow alum 20=acquaintance We look forward to hearing from you! =================================================================== PLEASE NOTE: All replies to this address are processed by a computer. If you have any problems, questions or requests send an e-mail to issues(a)sixdegrees.com and you'll receive a prompt and courteous response. And, if you'd like to review our privacy statement just visit http://www.sixdegrees.com/Public/About/Privacy.asp ==================================================================== sixdegrees is Registered in the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. E.DB.ANB.1

3 2

Toto `PLP' a key?
by Adam Back 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Then there is this `key', which appears to be fabricated, though the armor checksum checks if you modify it as follows.... -----BEGIN PLP PRIVATE KEY----- Version: Pretty Lousy Privacy v6.66 Comments: No Comment UPghm21YcptuKTiUHPwTn4xSjMKfsfVDRKwKWtx1teuauHiM/IBzWMH5+nhxhVjO gOuUIXkcJXcjr1yG2QVGWLJndKBHC3wI/eRC5zYaQGwtz97hpQ9iAJl9hpIYoeKi R/Qe8eC8vQnyOCx7Gare+OuoqLRJj5IvvS3BDShb1mr3s3U1LVEhmI9kS5br6NWY V1J3l2hCk8cdqDRZmgjUoq32mAwK/vTbijCg5Yk1CCkXO3mvia3rNeVdrYJ3/Pv9 t2jHIlAL0qAyJQMdz2qFcmvLOxB3ZiZhA+VYDaeXZ5TZNEz/K+TSU8brMInfaUKi P/R/4YerdYjN8/10xz/j/gJjgIkEddToUYjt2VQDv8E/xcXT0YJZhNWIT/u+MHVF ns9RWIH5J+UxcKPUPjDB7WvuO4+WvoT5xCtPbQhUlpuJrDfWLCjUd6orzovr6yZx HcxBSl8EGy4oULWi5ztrw1fyXm4AmpDB5QNgmWcILIbWNDOAePqxvrAjJEhLHQar y6eHYoL/nuOQonZsB66DhXnlXSghBGp+sNs3XXIOkKHtbPk1jqT9MHg9oe7OwiA4 mcQUpM3XKOPUXcMwEtRzDJnIaeZo3xbwRnmdSaGAyPujFJdz58QLHOte2pcSAkrA Jtrs+SrhZw== =zXsO -----END PLP PRIVATE KEY----- (Posted in message Subject: Re: EFF $10,000,0000 Challenge, Date: 6 Sep 97). Now, change the ----- lines to the correct, and the first 5 chars are the same on PGP public key blocks 'mQENAz' (though this claims to be a SECRET KEY BLOCK) -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: Pretty Lousy Privacy v6.66 Comments: No Comment mQENAz1YcptuKTiUHPwTn4xSjMKfsfVDRKwKWtx1teuauHiM/IBzWMH5+nhxhVjO gOuUIXkcJXcjr1yG2QVGWLJndKBHC3wI/eRC5zYaQGwtz97hpQ9iAJl9hpIYoeKi R/Qe8eC8vQnyOCx7Gare+OuoqLRJj5IvvS3BDShb1mr3s3U1LVEhmI9kS5br6NWY V1J3l2hCk8cdqDRZmgjUoq32mAwK/vTbijCg5Yk1CCkXO3mvia3rNeVdrYJ3/Pv9 t2jHIlAL0qAyJQMdz2qFcmvLOxB3ZiZhA+VYDaeXZ5TZNEz/K+TSU8brMInfaUKi P/R/4YerdYjN8/10xz/j/gJjgIkEddToUYjt2VQDv8E/xcXT0YJZhNWIT/u+MHVF ns9RWIH5J+UxcKPUPjDB7WvuO4+WvoT5xCtPbQhUlpuJrDfWLCjUd6orzovr6yZx HcxBSl8EGy4oULWi5ztrw1fyXm4AmpDB5QNgmWcILIbWNDOAePqxvrAjJEhLHQar y6eHYoL/nuOQonZsB66DhXnlXSghBGp+sNs3XXIOkKHtbPk1jqT9MHg9oe7OwiA4 mcQUpM3XKOPUXcMwEtRzDJnIaeZo3xbwRnmdSaGAyPujFJdz58QLHOte2pcSAkrA Jtrs+SrhZw== =zXsO -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- and the armor checksum checks, and pgp5 reports (the garbled): Adding keys: Key ring: 'p1.asc' Type Bits KeyID Created Expires Algorithm Use pub 37916 00000000 2002-08-13 2079-10-29 (null) uid *** This key is unnamed *** 1 matching key found which looks to be garbage; perhaps it is is just garbage with a valid public key checksum? This seems like it would require writing some software to acheive? The probability of a random checksum success on a garbled file, as the armor checksum is a 24 bit checksum is 1/2^24... quite unlikely. Ideas? Adam

1 0