December 2003 - cypherpunks-legacy

Check this out, It's worth a look
by fiy83＠unipa.it 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Wayward Teens They Can't Keep Their Damn Clothes On!!! We've Captured It On Film, and We're Giving It Away! For The Next Two Weeks Only!!! Come To, http://209.84.246.106/amateur/ You can also copy and paste the above URL. 7

1 0

Returns You Have Asked For
by coy60＠ohrid.cca.vu.nl 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

America's largest monopoly shattered!!!!! New growth market 2 1/2 times size of telephone industry Now open to general public. Over 50% returns. IRA approved. More details and short video presentation here http://205.134.183.46/fpc/alt.html o

1 0

Re: TheCodex's D.I.R.T. surveillance software
by hippyman 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 07:50 AM 6/18/98 , you wrote: >I have come across a webpage at > >http://www.thecodex.com/dirt.html > >that describes a so-called D.I.R.T. (Data Interception by Remote >Transmission) software enabling the attacker (be it a criminal or >police or govt.) to remotely keep a close eye on everything that't >going on on the target PC. I can pretty much imagine how it works once >it's installed but what I'd like to know is *how* it gets installed on >the target computer? >I would also appreciate any info about the product from people with >first hand experience, since I intend to do an in-depth research for >one of the European Governments. Why don't you contact the owner and ask him how it works? Posting to cypherpunks and asking questions about it seems a bit unusual. Smells like a spam. You're name wouldn't be Spyking, would it? hippyman ICQ: 11517383 PGP Fingerprint: E3C3 35C8 0FD9 6F36 2ADD 0541 B58C F6BD D347 BD0A Public Key: http://keys.pgp.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD347BD0A

1 0

CTIA Daily News From WOW-COM - June 19, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

================================ Welcome to the second day of the CTIA Daily News From WOW-COM. Please click on the icon for the most important news in wireless communications today. ================================

1 0

Re: Tim's views on the racial problem in America
by Blanc 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

John Young wrote: >The center is gone for good, cry a tear, then bravely affirm: >good riddance to Ptolemaic centricity. Normalcy is now para. >Listen to what your teeth are picking up from the spectrum >transmitting to the inner ear bone: the spheres whistling >Dixie in the dark. ............................................ I know just what you mean, JYA. "He took his vorpal sword in hand; Long time the manxome foe he sought - So rested he by the Tumtum tree, And stood awhile in thought. .. Blanc

1 0

Never Recieve Junk Mail Again!
by owner-cypherpunks 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Wouldn't it be great to never get junk e-mail again? Well, No one can make you that promise unfortunetly....but you can Profit from junk e-mail.There's an old saying "If you can't beat em..join em!" You can make incredible money sending your own mass e-mails. If you own your own business or have a product or idea to sell , then you probably know that all advertising works..it's just a question of whether it's cost effective or not. What could be more cost effective that a ZERO cost of adverising? If you sent out 500,000 e-mails which would take you only a few minutes to set your computer up to do,and you only recieved one half of one percent responce..that would be 2500 people responding to your ad. And the cost to do it was NOTHING. Junk e-mail is here to stay, the U.S Congress in their infinite wisdom has recently passed legislation legitimizing mass e-mail. So wouldn't it be nice to laugh every time you recieve a piece of junk e-mail from someone because you'll know for every one you recieve ,you're sending out hundreds of thousands. If your computer is sitting idle while you're at work or play...your crazy! You could be earning money while your asleep,at work or out having fun. It's not like you have to sit there and watch it run! So why isn't every one doing it. Well, your local internet service provider spent lots of money installing filtering equiptment to keep out this so called junk e-mail and in fact for years there's been sort of a fun little war going on between the junk e-mail software writers and the internet serrvice provider filter software writers to see who could out smart who.The end result is that sending mass e-mails legally has become an art . But it's really all about knowing the secrets and having the right software. AVATAR Publishing is offering you the type of expertise and support that would take you years to learn.We know all the secrets (obviously or you wouldn't be reading this would you?) and we have the software to deliver to most of the internet service providers. So her's the offer... AVATAR is offering you a mass e-mail starter kit complete with step by step instructions on how to get sarted sending out mass e-mail...a current explanation of what's legal and not legal...how to extract e-mail addresses from the internet ...how to get targeted e-mail addresses...a FREE trial version of the most effective mass e-mail software program ever developed...a list of bulk e-mail friendly internet service providers....a complete explaination of the secrets of how to legally get your mail through the filtering and why it works....and finally a real telephone number so you can have technical support and keep updated on new developments in the mass e-mail community.The total cost of this kit is only $29 If you would like to stop having you computer sit idle while your at work or asleep and start having it make money for you ..... Send $29 to AVATAR Publishing 832 Colorado Blvd. Los Angeles,Ca 90041 If you would like to be removed from our e-mail list ,send a written request to the above address

1 0

Earn $100 every time OUR phone rings...
by thall322＠mci2000.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

ALL YOU DO IS ADVERTISE THIS 800 NUMBER! THAT'S ALL!! $100 goes to you for EVERY sale that the company closes! Does the idea of making at least $1,000 per week beginning your 2nd week of doing business excite you? How about never having to sell a thing to your customer and never having to talk to ANYONE to make money? I don't know how this could get any easier. EVERY aspect of selling or talking to someone is DONE COMPLETELY by the company! The number one home based business for the 2nd year in a row, Fortune 5000 is a member of the Better Business Bureau and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce. WHAT THIS BUSINESS WILL DO FOR YOU: * Handles all your calls, closes your sales, and sends you WEEKLY commission checks! * It pays you a $100 commission (that's over 50% of the total sale) for EVERY sale. CHECKS put $$$ in your pocket in less than your first week or two... Quick commission earnings build and maintain motivation. ALL YOU DO IS ADVERTISE the toll-free number and your ID number. * You can get STARTED TODAY. Just advertise the business toll-free number with your ID # and let this business CLOSE YOUR SALES every day... They do all the work and YOU GET PAID FOR IT! * You may advertise any way you choose: Bulk E-Mail, Flyers, Classifieds, Postcards, etc. Suppose you use bulk E-Mail, as I am: 100,000 E-Mails with a 1/10th of a percent (0.1%) sales rate at $100 per sale nets $10,000... not too bad. There is nothing else out there that will provide you with an immediate income beginning THIS WEEK with minimal effort. Before you call, I want you to think about the quality of the live operators handling your call. I am convinced you will not find a better team of closers for your own personal sales. You will clearly understand what I am talking about once you call. PLEASE DON'T LET THIS PASS YOU BY. MAKE THE CALL!! 1-800-811-2141 You will be asked for ID #50030 when you call. (Live operators are available from 8 AM-10 PM CST Monday through Saturday and will be able to answer any questions you may have.) Call one of the 24hr TESTIMONIAL lines at 888-703-5389, 888-446-6949, 888-446-6951 or 888-731-3457 (all toll free).

1 0

e-cash
by Bozhidar V Bozhinov 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear Sirs, This is Mr. Bozhinov from the D. Tsenov Academy of Economics writing. I am at the present time a Ph. D. student at the Department of Finance in the framework of The Academy. Through Internet saw in the Web site that you are work in the aria of e-money. Unfortunately, at the moment in Bulgaria there are a few academitions, when are working in this problem. Thats why I would like to ask you for more information about this problem. Id be very grateful if you might recommend me or send me some materials concerning this question. Look forward hearing from you soon. Yours faithfully, Mr. B. Bozhinov, Ph. D. Student D. Tsenov Academy of Economics begin: vcard fn: Bozhidar Bozhinov n: Bozhinov;Bozhidar org: Tsenov Academy of Economics adr: 2 Em. Chakarov Str;;51 Cherni Vrah Str.;Svishtov;Lovech;5250;Bulgaria email;internet: boshko(a)uni-svishtov.bg title: PhD Student tel;work: +359-631-22721-250 x-mozilla-cpt: ;0 x-mozilla-html: FALSE version: 2.1 end: vcard

1 0

IRC #cypherpunks
by Judd Howie 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

A cypherpunks channel has also been set up on the Austnet IRC network irc.austnet.org and then /map for your closest server /join #cypherpunks that's where we are in the southern hemisphere anyway GBH

1 0

US attorney MOTION TO REMAND
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Friday 6/19/98 1:42 PM John Young Morales and I met for lunch. I just finished documents referencing the two Tenth circuit docket sheets you posted on our cases. http://jya.com/whp-10usca.htm http://www.jya.com/arm061298.htm Zeitgeist again. We are moving to the Tenth circuit AGAIN. http://www.jya.com/whp061098.htm http://www.jya.com/whp060998.htm Morales is going to come over review, then we will send you AND ABOUT EVERY Member of Congress A COPY. Mitchell's attempt for the in camera ex parte meeting with the court may have failed. Thanks to you and Orlin. And, consequently, some upset Members of Congress. http://www.jya.com/whp052898.htm I, of course, DENY I called judge Santiago Campos a FASCIST PIG. Try searching for PIG. That is likely the reason Mitchell phoned this morning to say she going to file to remand the first FOIA [algorithms] request to NSA. Later bill

1 0

Pauline Hanson's One Nation newsletter - June 1998 update
by Global Web Builders 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Issue 2.1, June 1998 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- PLEASE NOTE: No unsolicited email is sent. If you do not want to be on the mailing list please say "REMOVE" in the subject line and return this message in the body. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- G'day One Nation supporters in NSW New quick access to One Nation home page NOW live!!! http://www.onenation.com.au ---------------------------- Queensland State Election: ========================= This is our first communication since last week's Queensland State Election. See archive of live coverage: http://www.gwb.com.au/onenation/qldstate/june13 One Nation has secured an amazing 11 seats (out of 89) with 23% of the primary vote. (Compare this to the Nationals 23 seats on just 15% of the primary vote!) See: http://www.ecq.qld.gov.au/ecq/98summary.html In the latest news it now appears likely that One Nation will support the Coalition to ensure a stable government in Queensland - although this is not yet finalised and the support of two independents, Liz Cunningham and Peter Wellington still have to be secured. ------------------------------------ Unofficial One Nation daily newspaper: ===================================== The anotd (Australian National News of the Day) - Australia's oldest on-line saily newspaper provides reader feedback and information on Pauline Hanson and One Nation. The paper at: http://www.gwb.com.au/gwb/news/daily.html has an archive for subscribers going back to October 1995. Negotiations are currently underway to make this paper available by "fax back" - initially on a weekly basis. This will allow anyone with a fax to get a weekly summary of issues being discussed faxed to them. ------------------------------------ Web Ring: ======== The One Nation web site now has a web ring listing about 20 One Nation sites. If you wish to add a One Nation site please use the "add a web site" link. All additions to the web ring are moderated and GWB's decision on whether or not to link you is final. You are of course welcome to just carry the web ring banner and links at: http://www.gwb.com.au/onenation/ring1.html Thanks to Peter for his help on this. A number of historic One Nation web sites including the April 1997 launch in Ipswich and Hanson's speeches are currently available from the web ring. ------------------------------------- The power of email: ================== I have been informed by the ABC Radio National's "Background Briefing" that they will be talking about the power of email tomorrow (Sunday at 9.10am). Apparently the action taken by many One Nation supporters in expressing their concern to 60 Minutes sponsor, Toyota, about the programmes behaviour towards Pauline Hanson and One Nation was very effective and will be raised during the ABC report. To all those who participated thank you. I trust you all got the standard Toyota response broadcast in the middle of last week. I am aware that the support shown has served its purpose for the time being and I hope that 60 Minutes shows more balance in future or we will be obliged to call on your support again. See: http://www.gwb.com.au/60.html for background on the 60 Minutes segment "A CALL TO ARMS". ---------------------------------- Federal Election: ================ One Nation's Federal Election web site is currently under development. See: http://www.gwb.com.au/onenation/federal ---------------------------------- GWB Scott Balson

1 0

Re: TheCodex's D.I.R.T. surveillance software
by hippyman 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

At 09:29 PM 6/19/98 , you wrote: >>>I have come across a webpage at >>> >>>http://www.thecodex.com/dirt.html etc... >>Why don't you contact the owner and ask him how it works? Posting to >>cypherpunks and asking questions about it seems a bit unusual. Smells like >>a spam. >> >>You're name wouldn't be Spyking, would it? etc... >Mine is and I didn't post it... I got the same request privately... from >this person... I am not trying to sell it ... especially to a European >government... My wrong, then. I enjoy your list and didn't really think you spam another mailing list in such a fashion as I was interpreting, but I thought I'd sniff it out anyway. My apologies for the accusation. hippyman ICQ: 11517383 PGP Fingerprint: E3C3 35C8 0FD9 6F36 2ADD 0541 B58C F6BD D347 BD0A Public Key: http://keys.pgp.com:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xD347BD0A

1 0

AUcrypto mailinglist
by Julian Assange 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

With things starting to heat up here in Australia (DoD/DSD has recently taken to making some exceptionally nasty noises about prosecuting Eric Young, Tim Hudson and the rest of the Australian CryptoMozilla team). I'd like to remind everyone who's interested in aussie/nz crypto issues of the aucrypto mailing list. _ _ _ ____ ______ ______ _____ ___ / \ | | | |/ ___| _ \ \ / / _ \_ _/ _ \ / _ \| | | | | | |_) \ V /| |_) || || | | | / ___ \ |_| | |___| _ < | | | __/ | || |_| | /_/ \_\___/ \____|_| \_\|_| |_| |_| \___/ Australasian & Pacific Cryptography mail the word "subscribe" to aucrypto-request(a)suburbia.net or mail the word "subscribe" to aucrypto-d-request(a)suburbia.net (AUCRYPTO weekly digest) WHEN YOU HAVE SUBSCRIBED ------------------------ Send in a brief synopsis of who you are and why you are interested in AUCRYPTO as your first message to the list (this helps to stimulate discussion and debate as well as provide a sense of the AUCRYPTO community). As a [small] example: "Hello AUCRYPTO! My name is Sara Harding. I'm a technical services officer working at the AFP (Australian Federal Police), specialising in cryptogrpahic issues." SUBSCRIBING ----------- Send mail to: aucrypto-request(a)suburbia.net or aucrypto-d-request(a)suburbia.net (AUCRYPTO digest) with the subject or body of: subscribe UN-SUBSCRIBING ------------- Send mail to: aucrypto-request(a)suburbia.net or aucrypto-d-request(a)suburbia.net (AUCRYPTO digest) with the subject or body of: unsubscribe aucrypto POSTING ------- To send a message to the list, address it to: aucrypto(a)suburbia.net Messages under 700 bytes in size will not be accepted. Send your one-liners to nobody(a)nowhere.org. REPLYING -------- If you are replying to a message already on the AUCRYPTO list using your mail programs reply facility you may have to change the reply address to aucrypto(a)suburbia.net. This is because the AUCRYPTO mailing list program is configured to have return replies sent the author in order to avoid receiving the replies of misconfigured "vacation" programs which automatically send email saying "I've gone to the moon for two weeks to hunt rare bits". ARCHIVES -------- Monthly back issues of aucrypto since January 96 are available from: ftp://suburbia.net/pub/mailinglists/aucrypto You can also instruct the mailing list processor to automatically scan and retrive messages from the archive. It understands the following commands: get filename ... ls directory ... egrep case_insensitive_regular_expression filename ... maxfiles nnn version Aliases for 'get': send, sendme, getme, gimme, retrieve, mail Aliases for 'ls': dir, directory, list, show Aliases for 'egrep': search, grep, fgrep, find Lines starting with a '#' are ignored. Multiple commands per mail are allowed. Setting maxfiles to zero will remove the limit (to protect you against yourself no more than maxfiles files will be returned per request). Egrep supports most common flags. Examples: ls vomume96 (for aucrypto digest) ls latest (the latest directory containes the archived messages) get latest/12 egrep some.word latest/* TECHNICAL --------- The list processor software is based on the excellent Procmail/Smartlist by Stephen R. van den Berg <berg(a)pool.informatik.rwth-aachen.de> with some minor extensions by Julian Assange <proff(a)suburbia.net>.

1 0

No Subject
by Linda Reed--PCC West Campus CSC 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

RIP - SPACE ALIENS HIDE M DRUGS!!! ___________________________________ The ReptiliansInBlack and the MenInTheShadows were arguing vehemently over the best path to take in order to maintain effective damage control over the increasingly wide-spread danger posed by the known and unknown actions of the Author. Regardless, in the end, they all had to answer to Gomez... In the days preceeding the Terry Nichols verdict, they had managed to divert the Author's attention by murdering his aunt in Nevada, Missouri, forcing him to abandon Denver in the middle of the night to drive to her funeral. They had managed to find and destroy the TRIN VirtualNuclear Diskette Bombs the Author had left at various federal government buildings in the previous few days, but their agent in Cape Girardo indicated that the Author also claimed to have planted the TRIN VNDB's among members of the Nichols jury. Was this another one of the Author's disinformation tactics, or was their own double agent at Bureau42 actually a triple agent, helping to obscure the Author's trail of FUD after his having lost the Watchers in both Denver and Nevada? When the RIP's and the MIS's were notified by Captain Button's former superiors that the Author had been discovered roaming his old haunts in Tucson, the BlackBaggers who inventoried his truck found postcards purchased in Branson, Oklahoma City and Waco. Not a good sign... When the Author posted the 'SweatHog Log' of the SAHMD manuscripts from Linda Lou Reeds Pima College account, it was taken as a sign that HeOrShe was once again ready to jump to another location, and was again challenging the Watchers to track him. After he led them directly to his current SafeHouse in Tucson, however, it became clear that he was once again taunting them by revealing another clue in the ongoing battle to discover the true extent and/or existence of the alleged underground computer society known as the Circle of Eunuchs. It wasn't until they met in Tucson with the US Air Force intelligence officer from Bienfait that the ReptiliansInBlack and the MenInTheShadows realized the horrendous implications of the 'clue' that the Author was rubbing their noses in... "Bob and Polly McWilliams, sons named Trevor and Rory." the Flying Spook told those gathered around the conference table at the back of the Blue Saguaro. "They're friends of Mark, the owner." he said, causing great consternation among the various spooks participating in the dinner and drinks TruthMonger Rap Session taking place--apparently in the heart of enemy territory. As if on cue, the owner approached their table, to inquire as to the suitability of the food, drinks and service.Y\j owner, nonchalantly, adding, "I haven't seen you since the Club Car...are you bugging our conversation?" The owner of the Blue Saguaro laughed and winked slyly, replying, "Not tonight. There's no band, so it's the sound man's night off..." The assorted crew of Casper's Cousins, as they liked to think of themselves, each began replaying in his or her own mind the contents of their preceeding conversations, much to the amusement of Mark and his old pal, the Flying Spook. "Tomorrow's edition..." the Flying Spook told his compatriots, handing each of them a computer printout of the Bienfait Nutly News. "I'm the new editor-in-chief." He turned and walked away with the owner, talking over old times...

1 0

Reptilians In Black - SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!!
by Linda Reed--PCC West Campus CSC 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

RIP - SPACE ALIENS HIDE M DRUGS!!! ___________________________________ The ReptiliansInBlack and the MenInTheShadows were arguing vehemently over the best path to take in order to maintain effective damage control over the increasingly wide-spread danger posed by the known and unknown actions of the Author. Regardless, in the end, they all had to answer to Gomez... In the days preceeding the Terry Nichols verdict, they had managed to divert the Author's attention by murdering his aunt in Nevada, Missouri, forcing him to abandon Denver in the middle of the night to drive to her funeral. They had managed to find and destroy the TRIN VirtualNuclear Diskette Bombs the Author had left at various federal government buildings in the previous few days, but their agent in Cape Girardo indicated that the Author also claimed to have planted the TRIN VNDB's among members of the Nichols jury. Was this another one of the Author's disinformation tactics, or was their own double agent at Bureau42 actually a triple agent, helping to obscure the Author's trail of FUD after his having lost the Watchers in both Denver and Nevada? When the RIP's and the MIS's were notified by Captain Button's former superiors that the Author had been discovered roaming his old haunts in Tucson, the BlackBaggers who inventoried his truck found postcards purchased in Branson, Oklahoma City and Waco. Not a good sign... When the Author posted the 'SweatHog Log' of the SAHMD manuscripts from Linda Lou Reeds Pima College account, it was taken as a sign that HeOrShe was once again ready to jump to another location, and was again challenging the Watchers to track him. After he led them directly to his current SafeHouse in Tucson, however, it became clear that he was once again taunting them by revealing another clue in the ongoing battle to discover the true extent and/or existence of the alleged underground computer society known as the Circle of Eunuchs. It wasn't until they met in Tucson with the US Air Force intelligence officer from Bienfait that the ReptiliansInBlack and the MenInTheShadows realized the horrendous implications of the 'clue' that the Author was rubbing their noses in... "Bob and Polly McWilliams, sons named Trevor and Rory." the Flying Spook told those gathered around the conference table at the back of the Blue Saguaro. "They're friends of Mark, the owner." he said, causing great consternation among the various spooks participating in the dinner and drinks TruthMonger Rap Session taking place--apparently in the heart of enemy territory. As if on cue, the owner approached their table, to inquire as to the suitability of the food, drinks and service.Y\j owner, nonchalantly, adding, "I haven't seen you since the Club Car...are you bugging our conversation?" The owner of the Blue Saguaro laughed and winked slyly, replying, "Not tonight. There's no band, so it's the sound man's night off..." The assorted crew of Casper's Cousins, as they liked to think of themselves, each began replaying in his or her own mind the contents of their preceeding conversations, much to the amusement of Mark and his old pal, the Flying Spook. "Tomorrow's edition..." the Flying Spook told his compatriots, handing each of them a computer printout of the Bienfait Nutly News. "I'm the new editor-in-chief." He turned and walked away with the owner, talking over old times...

1 0

Bienfait Reptilian News - SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!!
by Linda Reed--PCC West Campus CSC 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

RIP/BNN - SPACE ALIENS HIDE M DRUGS!!! _______________________________________ Bienfait Nutly News--Desert Storm / Texas Tornado Special: [BNN-Tucson, Arizona--THE 'FOUR CORNERS' SEARCH FOR A PAIR OF Certified CopKillers took a bizarre twist today, when it was learned that the Author of SPACE ALIENS HIDE M DRUGS was apparently serving merely as a diversionary decoy for LEA's involved in the search, while an unknown compatriot was busy either providing clandestine supply support for the pair, or perhaps even arranging transportation for the suspects to a safehouse located outside of the search area. Under cross-examination by a variety of LEA/Spooks, the RCMP involved in setting up the Author on a variety of charges under the Criminal Code Of Canada admitted that they had been holding back evidence suggesting that the Author was not acting alone in his TRIN VirtualNuclear Diskette Bomb Soft Target World Tour. Newspapers dated after the Author's flight to semi-safety south of the forty-ninth parallel were found at the scene of the first VirtualNuclear Device discovered by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police at the Court House eleven KILLometers from MongerItaVille, home of the Bienfait Nutly News, where the Author was scheduled to be railroaded into serving a four-year sentence for 'Failure To Appear' on the 'Dog At Large' charges trumped up by local Bienfait officials under RCMP direction. "There were two different sets of newspapers dated after the Author's flight from Canada found at the scene of the First VirtualNuclear Device." an RCMP official foolishly revealed to the Flying Spook assigned by the US Air Force to investigate the Author, never considering that the agent may have been 'turned' by the Circle of Eunuchs into a secret ally. "We traced the placement of one of the sets of newspapers to the Author's nephew, Human Gus-Peter, who had been promised a new state-of-the-art computer in return for helping to obstrufucate the details behind the placement of the TRIN VNDB Device. The second set of newpapers, from an earlier date, were obviously placed by an unknown entity, working in collusion with the Author from the beginning." The Flying Spook, in his first action as the new editor- in-chief of the Bienfait Nutly News, informed the RCMP that the Author, after mailing evidence of RCMP illegal activity, collusion and conspiracy to a Time/Netly News reportwhore from Sidney, Montana, had holed up at the Way Station in Gillette, Montana, for a few days, proceeding south only after meeting with a shadowy figure who had given one of the local residents of the homeless shelter a handful of Canadian coins when asked for spare change. The Flying Spook also suggested that the Author's travel schedule, seemingly laying an interrupted trail through the HeartLand of paramilitary activity on the way to theYT targets along the way, was actually a diversionary tactic designed to divert attention from the movements of his conspiratorial compatriot--rumored to be a long-time active member of the Circle of Eunuchs and CyphperPunks Disturbed Male LISP, as well as a recent inductee into the Army of Dog. The new Editor-In-Chief of the Bienfait Nutly News also revealed that his investigation into the alleged connection of the NuclearBomberAdulteress in Minot, North Dakota, and the ButtonBomberJoyRider from Tucson, Arizona, to the Circle of Eunuchs and Army of Dog had turned up a variety of startling facts, despite the Flying Spook's failure to include those facts in his official report. Among those facts are the following: EveryBody Wants To Go To Soviet Heaven, But No One Wants To Spy: It took the Flying Spook only a few weeks to verify hard links between the Author and a variety of single, double and triple agents ranging from Scotland to the Middle East--from the 1800's to the 1990's. The Author's background had been invesigated previously, to little avail, and the Flying Spook was mystified as to how apparently competent investigators could fail to realize that the key to covert and subversive links very often lie in the history of the women 'behind the throne', so to speak. Elanor Roosevelt, Lady Byrd Johnson, Nancy Reagan...even Casper's Cousins unfamiliar with the course of history should be able to see the implication implied by these recent examples of the Hidden Hands Of Destiny working through the wives of those serving as the front men for the true movers and shakers in society. The Zippo lighter bearing the crest of the Naval Guided Missle School carried by the Author had long been dismissed as an insignificant detail by a long string of investigators who crossed paths with HimOrHer at various times and places. It was the family history of Polly McWilliams that allowed the Flying Spook to bring together a wide range of seemingly individual 'coincidences' into a logical, coherent pattern. Clifden Albert Banner: Polly McWilliam's brother. A former B-52 bomber pilot with connections to both the NuclearBomberAdulteress and the ButtonBomberJoyRider provided the Flying Spook with his first hard connection between the Author and Armed Forces personnel suspected of having Circle of Eunuchs connections. Major Banner's military history working at top levels of the Strategic Air Command, as well as with the Joint Chiefs of Staff at the Pentagon provided the Flying Spook with an immediate RedFlag that suggested even the remotest connectionYT what would be found upon further investigation. It therefore came as no surprise to find that, after having put in place a wide variety of possible co-conspirators within the Armed Forces network, Major Banner retired to become a Senior Engineering Specialist-Mission Planning System, in the New England Operations Field Office of GDE Systems, a major military contractor. Neither was it a surprise that Major Banner's specialty was...computers. Jane Banner: Polly McWilliam's sister. Heavily involved as a programmer, for Nortel, with highly sensitive work in an area of the joint US/Chinese encryption program that was suspected to have strong covert connections to the CypherPunks and the Circle of Eunuchs. Earl David Banner: Polly McWilliam's father. A Boston Globe Journalist who had been privy to the most secret of secrets in a comprehensive array of social circles ranging from the Roosevelts and the Kennedys to Cardinal Cushing and the Lords of Lourdes. Earl Banner's Anglican heritage was in seeming contrast to his Catholic connections until the Flying Spook discovered the close connection between the Author's Catholic lineage through the French Norris clan on his mother's side and the Catholic lineage of the McWilliams clan to which Polly's husband, Bob, was a vital link. Moyra Banner: Polly's McWilliam's mother. Grew up in Montreal and met her future husband through sources closely connected to the Bartonian Metaphysical Society and what was later to become the Solar Temple Cult--both of which were organizations with close connections to the Author and David Humisky, a shadowy figure who had stunned the Canadian Military by engineering a quick end to a student military-game project designed to provide information and data on the capability of military neophytes engaging in spontaneous war games. Alan McKenzie: Polly McWilliams' great-grandfather. Driven with his family from the Isle of Lewis, in Scotland, by the Laird, as a result of his subversive political connections to a Welsh mining rebel named Bennett, whose grandson, Leslie James Bennett, would rise out of one of the 'Little Moscows' in South Wales, serving as a bastion of the British Labour Party, to become the Chief of the Russian Desk for the RCMP's Security Service, before beingYT with connections to fellow Red Caspers McClean and Kim Philby. Terry Dee: A long-time friend and confidante of Bob and Polly McWilliams, as well as a shadowy presence in the life of the Author's decade-long lover in Austin and Tuscon. The Flying Spook had originally researched his connection to the Author as a result of Dee's work for various American spook agencies during his travels in the Middle East, and was stunned to discover the close links between Dee's ancestors--the O'Days--and the Author's great-grandfather, Clarence Day, whose progeny in Mountain Home, Idaho, once again completed the Circle between the Author and Major Clif Banner, as well as filling in the Author's connection to the Naval Guided Missle School and a wide variety of suspected Circle of Eunuchs initiates employed at sensitive military and secret government laboratory sites around the world. Merna Brown: The Author's first wife. A member of the Bartonian Metaphysical Society, and whose father had proved to be a vital link in the connection between the socialist New Democratic Party of Tommy Douglas and the suspected Russian agent, James Leslie Bennett. Merna Brown had eventually turned up in Ontario in a government position ideally suited for providing financial and personal history support for a number of individuals drifting back and forth between the Solar Temple, Elohim City, Waco and San Diego, changing identities as they went. Dave Foreman: The Flying Spook found it interesting that the Author had appeared to have absolutely no contact with Dave Foreman or any of the Earth First subversives in Arizona during HisOrHer time there, yet seemed to be involved in advising and training a wide variety of those connected to Earth First in various areas of the country, particularly in Northern California. Hidden deep within the mountains of files kept on those who marched in protests at the LizardMore Lavoratory was a note which attributed authorship of a song, "We're Going To Take It Sitting Down," a banner tune for a Berkeley radical group named La Palomas, to one C.J. Parker, who was also known to have authored "Don't Blame Me, I Voted For The Monkey." Black Elk: Equally intriguing was the Author's close connection to a wide variety of Rainbow Family members thoughout the US and Canada. While the Author seemingly remained unaware of his connection to the group, many of the Rainbow Family were notYT enormous amount of covert support during his wide travels. ears of investigation failed to discover the link until the Flying Spook engaged the Author in WarStories (TM) at the CoalDust Saloon in Bienfait, and heard a tale about HimOrHer joining an oddball van full of misfits including hippies, college athletes and a Catholic priest, on a trip to a mountain top in Colorado to await the fulfillment of the vision written of in "Black Elk Speaks." HeOrShe told of the Catholic priest smuggling an ounce of hashish across the border, shoved up his butt, screwing the Catholic girls on the trip, and then absolving them, and carrying a mountain of liquor up the mountain on his back, a Herculean task which made him a legend among those at the gathering who considered a spiritual journey to be incomplete without a jigger of earthly spirits to ease their passage. The Author told of rising in the middle of the night to relieve himself of excess spirits and falling into one of the slit-trench crappers that had been dug for the occassion, swearing like a trooper as he climbed out, only to fall into another, and yet another, with the whole gathering laughing riotously in the dark at the Fool In The Stool, as he called himself. He had little idea that not only did the whole gathering know who he was the next day (even though he pretended ignorance of the whole affair), but that the story of his folly had become one of the legends told by the original members of the Rainbow Family which was born at the gathering. Ken Sleight: Government efforts to investigate an alleged underground railroad for a variety of outlaws, desperados and radicals, including a trail of SafeHouses and HideOuts throughout the western US, invariably led to one or another of passages in and out of the Four Corners area. The Author and Utah outfitter Ken Slight were often found to be operating in close proximity without ever seeming to have confirmable direct contact. Interestingly, they both seemed to have contact with a large number of the same people involved in environmental and survivalist arenas, including Bob Mason, of Durango, although under an assumed name. XS4ALL: InterNet Free Terra both hosted the banned website during their censorship troubles with the the German government, and helped a variety of other sites set up mirror sites around the same time. One of the causes of XS4ALL's troubles was the publication of how-to tips on derailing trains. Although it was confirmed that the Author's travel schedule coincided with a number of railway 'accidents', including theYT in the vicinity of Saskatoon, no positive links to HisOrHer involvement could be established. The Flying Spook's recent investigation, however, turned up the fact that a variety of those hosting mirrors of the XS4ALL website had travel schedules which coincided with that of the Author at the times of several railway 'accidents', although, once again, no positive link between the individuals could be established. Synchronincidence: Time is a trick to keep suspicious minds from positively connecting Taoist subversive criminal radicals to the events for which they are obviously responsible. Space is a trick to keep Taoist subversive criminal radical coconspirators from being positively linked together when it is in the best interests of the government to claim that they are acting alone. Paranoia is a trick to keep non-Taoist subversive criminal radicals from realizing that most LEAs are real Lamers (TM), and that the only thing one needs to be paranoid of is paranoia, itself (it's a vicious cycle...). Guilt is a trick to keep psychotic sociopath subversive criminal radicals from killing everyone at once, so that there is still someone left to plot against them. DISCLAIMER!!! _____________ The Bienfait Nutly News makes no pretensions of operating as an ethical and responsible news source for individuals whose cerebral synapse circuits remain unaffected by moon phases and solar sunspot activity. We accept no responsibility for explaining how the translation of Reptilians In Black into an RIP acronym can go unnoticed by the editor until the end of the piece, or how a well-researched article can somehow seem to peter out into a meaningless morass of inconsequential facts and details. Hell, we don't even know what the right-square bracket is *really* called...]

1 0

The End of Secrecy
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

From: "The End of Secrecy," by Ann Florini, Foreign Policy, Summer, 1998: http://jya.com/teos.htm (39K) IMF managing director Michel Camdessus has explained, openness and transparency are now economic issues, not solely political ones: As more and more evidence has come to light about the adverse consequences of governance problems on economic performance--among them, losses in government revenue, lower quality public investment and public services, reduced private investment, and the loss of public confidence in government--a broader consensus has emerged on the central importance of transparency and good governance in achieving economic success. Most officials in Asia seem to have accepted the virtues of transparency, at least in the economic field. Singaporean senior minister Lee Kuan Yew, stressing the importance of transparency in a country's financial system, recently told Vietnamese prime minister Phan Van Khai: "In an age of information technology, instant communications and computers, if you try to hide, you are in trouble." [And:] The Entomopter Cometh One of the most unusual MIT designs on the drawing board is a four-inch-long, insect-like craft dubbed "the entomopter," equipped with legs for crawling through buildings or ventilation ducts, and flapping wings for airborne reconnaissance. Nevertheless, no matter how small, efficient, or cost-effective surveillance hardware becomes, there will always be limits to what technology can accomplish. Indeed, it is a double-edged sword--witness the polemics in Washington and on the Web over who, if anyone, should regulate electronic encryption. From untappable communications to pixel-by-pixel photo and video editing, technology is often as good at hiding secrets as it is at revealing them. Without a norm of transparency, technology will continue to protect private information as well as ferret it out. -----

1 0

INVESTMENT FRAUD: Learn how to detect and avoid!
by 104367.2728e＠compuserve.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Did you know that YOU could be one of MILLIONS of people who are victims of investment fraud each year?? Did you know that SCAM ARTISTS have defrauded people JUST LIKE YOU for more than $10 BILLION This Year?? CLICK HERE ----> http://www.FraudReview-IESC.com <---- TO KEEP YOUR MONEY If you are absolutely certain it could never be you, the fraudster starts with a big advantage. Investment fraud generally happens to people who think it could never happen to them. Learn how to avoid investment fraud, visit http://www.FraudReview-IESC.com BEFORE YOU INVEST - LEARN THE FACTS Investment Evaluative Services Corporation has compiled a desktop reference entitled "Inside the World of Investment Fraud, Scams and Deceptive Practices". It is easy to read, concise and contains the investment phrases, terms, and conditions that an investor should KNOW and AVOID! It also contains citations that will inform the investor of not only what investments should be avoided, but why. (Learn more at http://www.FraudReview-IESC.com) If terms like Asset Managed Programs, Bank Debentures, High Yield/Low Risk, Leveraged Funds, and Top 25 Banks are in your investment portfolio, you may already be a victim of investment fraud! If terms like Bank Guarantees of 106%, Blocked Funds Letter, Safe Keeping Receipt, and Trading Programs are not familiar to you, you may shortly become a victim of investment fraud! To learn more about Investment Evaluative Services Corporation products and services, please continue on to our home page http://www.FraudReview-IESC.com or call our toll free number 1(888)596-0956.

1 0

Need a Computer?? No Money Down!!
by 336688zs＠mci.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<HTML><BODY BGCOLOR="#ffffdf"> ...BRAND NEW PENTIUM II... ..COMPUTER.. ..NO MONEY DOWN... ...EARN HUGE INCOME.... only serious inquiries only! (for more information & application leave your name, fax & phone #) More info: put "COMPUTER" in subject area and mailto: fwd617(a)mycomsoftware.net Click Here </HTML>

1 0

$36000 in 14 Weeks
by Company98 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hi My name is Jacqueline McCormack and I would like to show you how easy it is to really make a lot of money. I wouldn't be wasting my time doing this if I didn't know this system works,and all the money you invest is less than an evening at the movies for two. Anyone surely can afford that. I received a letter just like the one your reading now from a lady name Karren Liddel and the rest is history. Here is the email I received and judge for yourself if this will work or not. This is truly the one path I've found to financial freedom. Thanks for your time Jacque ================================================================= I Never Thought I'd Be the One Telling You This: I Actually Read a Piece of E-Mail & I'm Going to Europe on the Proceeds! Hello! My name is Karen Liddell; I'm a 35-year-old mom, wife, and part-time accountant. As a rule, I delete all unsolicited "junk" e-mail and use my account primarily for business. I received what I assumed was this same e-mail countless times and deleted it each time. About two months ago I received it again and, because of the catchy subject line, I finally read it. Afterwards, I thought , "OK, I give in, I'm going to try this. I can certainly afford to invest $20 and, on the other hand, there's nothing wrong with creating a little excess cash." I promptly mailed four $5 bills and, after receiving the reports, paid a friend of mine a small fee to send out some e-mail advertisements for me. After reading the reports, I also learned how easy it is to bulk e-mail for free! I was not prepared for the results. Everyday for the last six weeks, my P.O. box has been overflowing with $5 bills; many days the excess fills up an extra mail bin and I've had to upgrade to the corporate-size box! I am stunned by all the money that keeps rolling in! My husband and I have been saving for several years to make a substantial down payment on a house. Now, not only are we purchasing a house with 40% down, we're going to Venice, Italy to celebrate! I promise you, if you follow the directions in this e-mail and be prepared to eventually set aside about an hour each day to follow up (and count your money!), you will make at least as much money as we did. You don't need to be a wiz at the computer, but I'll bet you already are. If you can open an envelope, remove the money, and send an e-mail message, then you're on your way to the bank. Take the time to read this so you'll understand how easy it is. If I can do this, so can you! GO FOR IT NOW!! Karen Liddell The following is a copy of the e-mail I read: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ This is a LEGAL, MONEY-MAKING PHENOMENON. PRINT this letter, read the directions, THEN READ IT AGAIN !!! You are about to embark on the most profitable and unique program you may ever see. Many times over, it has demonstrated and proven its ability to generate large amounts of cash. This program is showing fantastic appeal with a huge and ever-growing on-line population desirous of additional income. This is a legitimate, LEGAL, money-making opportunity. It does not require you to come in contact with people, do any hard work, and best of all, you never have to leave the house, except to get the mail and go to the bank! This truly is that lucky break you've been waiting for! Simply follow the easy instructions in this letter, and your financial dreams will come true! When followed correctly, this electronic, multi-level marketing program works perfectly...100% EVERY TIME! Thousands of people have used this program to: - Raise capital to start their own business - Pay off debts - Buy homes, cars, etc., - Even retire! This is your chance, so don't pass it up! ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- OVERVIEW OF THIS EXTRAORDINARY ELECTRONIC MULTI-LEVEL MARKETING PROGRAM ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- Basically, this is what we do: We send thousands of people a product for $5.00 that costs next to nothing to produce and e-mail. As with all multi-level businesses, we build our business by recruiting new partners and selling our products. Every state in the U.S. allows you to recruit new multi- level business online (via your computer). The products in this program are a series of four business and financial reports costing $5.00 each. Each order you receive via "snail mail" will include: * $5.00 cash * The name and number of the report they are ordering * The e-mail address where you will e-mail them the report they ordered. To fill each order, you simply e-mail the product to the buyer. THAT'S IT! The $5.00 is yours! This is the EASIEST electronic multi-level marketing business anywhere! FOLLOW THE INSTRUCTIONS TO THE LETTER AND BE PREPARED TO REAP THE STAGGERING BENEFITS! ******* I N S T R U C T I O N S ******* This is what you MUST do: 1. Order all 4 reports shown on the list below (you can't sell them if you don't order them). * For each report, send $5.00 CASH, the NAME & NUMBER OF THE REPORT YOU ARE ORDERING, YOUR E-MAIL ADDRESS, and YOUR RETURN POSTAL ADDRESS (in case of a problem) to the person whose name appears on the list next to the report. * When you place your order, make sure you order each of the four reports. You will need all four reports so that you can save them on your computer and resell them. * Within a few days you will receive, via e-mail, each of the four reports. Save them on your computer so they will be accessible for you to send to the 1,000's of people who will order them from you. 2. IMPORTANT-- DO NOT alter the names of the people who are listed next to each report, or their sequence on the list, in any way other than is instructed below in steps "a" through "d" or you will lose out on the majority of your profits. Once you understand the way this works, you'll also see how it doesn't work if you change it. Remember, this method has been tested, and if you alter it, it will not work. a. Look below for the listing of available reports. b. After you've ordered the four reports, replace the name and address under REPORT #1 with your name and address, moving the one that was there down to REPORT #2. c. Move the name and address that was under REPORT #2 down to REPORT #3. d. Move the name and address that was under REPORT #3 down to REPORT #4. e. The name and address that was under REPORT #4 is removed from the list and has NO DOUBT collected their 50 grand. Please make sure you copy everyone's name and address ACCURATELY!!! 3. Take this entire letter, including the modified list of names, and save it to your computer. Make NO changes to the instruction portion of this letter. 4. Now you're ready to start an advertising campaign on the WORLDWIDE WEB! Advertising on the WEB is very, very inexpensive, and there are HUNDREDS of FREE places to advertise. Another avenue which you could use for advertising is e-mail lists. You can buy these lists for under $20/2,000 addresses or you can pay someone a minimal charge to take care of it for you. BE SURE TO START YOUR AD CAMPAIGN IMMEDIATELY! 5. For every $5.00 you receive, all you must do is e-mail them the report they ordered. THAT'S IT! ALWAYS PROVIDE SAME-DAY SERVICE ON ALL ORDERS! This will guarantee that the e-mail THEY send out, with YOUR name and address on it, will be prompt because they can't advertise until they receive the report! ------------------------------------------ AVAILABLE REPORTS ------------------------------------------ ***Order Each REPORT by NUMBER and NAME*** Notes: - ALWAYS SEND $5 CASH FOR EACH REPORT - ALWAYS SEND YOUR ORDER VIA FIRST CLASS MAIL - Make sure the cash is concealed by wrapping it in at least two sheets of paper - On one of those sheets of paper, include: (a) the number & name of the report you are ordering, (b) your e-mail address, and (c) your postal address. _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #1 "HOW TO REORGANIZE YOUR TIME TO ACCOMMODATE A HOME BASED BUSINESS" ORDER REPORT #1 FROM: COMPANY98 3941 E. CHANDLER BLVD SUITE 106-142 PHOENIX, AZ 85044 _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #2 "MAJOR CORPORATIONS AND E-MAIL" ORDER REPORT #2 FROM: ACY 3800 DEWEY AVE #298 ROCHESTER, NY 14616 _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #3 "SOURCES FOR THE BEST MAILING LISTS" ORDER REPORT #3 FROM: BUSINESS RESEARCH ASSOCIATES 459 COLUMBUS AVE, SUITE#504 NEW YORK, NY 10024 _________________________________________________________________ REPORT #4 "EVALUATING MULTI-LEVEL SALES PLANS" ORDER REPORT #4 FROM: BASQUIAT PO BOX 1963 EVANSTON, IL 60204 _________________________________________________________________ ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- HERE'S HOW THIS AMAZING PLAN WILL MAKE YOU $MONEY$ ----------------------------------------------------------------- --------------------------------- Let's say you decide to start small just to see how well it works. Assume your goal is to get 10 people to participate on your first level. (Placing a lot of FREE ads on the Internet will EASILY get a larger response.) Also assume that everyone else in YOUR ORGANIZATION gets ONLY 10 downline members. Follow this example to achieve the STAGGERING results below. 1st level--your 10 members with $5...........................................$50 2nd level--10 members from those 10 ($5 x 100)..................$500 3rd level--10 members from those 100 ($5 x 1,000)..........$5,000 4th level--10 members from those 1,000 ($5 x 10,000)...$50,000 THIS TOTALS ----------->$55,550 Remember friends, this assumes that the people who participate only recruit 10 people each. Think for a moment what would happen if they got 20 people to participate! Most people get 100's of participants! THINK ABOUT IT! Your cost to participate in this is practically nothing (surely you can afford $20). You obviously already have an Internet connection and e-mail is FREE!!! REPORT#3 shows you the most productive methods for bulk e-mailing and purchasing e-mail lists. Some list & bulk e-mail vendors even work on trade! About 50,000 new people get online every month! *******TIPS FOR SUCCESS******* * TREAT THIS AS YOUR BUSINESS! Be prompt, professional, and follow the directions accurately. * Send for the four reports IMMEDIATELY so you will have them when the orders start coming in because: When you receive a $5 order, you MUST send out the requested product/report to comply with the U.S. Postal & Lottery Laws, Title 18,Sections 1302 and 1341 or Title 18, Section 3005 in the U.S. Code, also Code of Federal Regs. vol. 16, Sections 255 and 436, which state that "a product or service must be exchanged for money received." * ALWAYS PROVIDE SAME-DAY SERVICE ON THE ORDERS YOU RECEIVE. * Be patient and persistent with this program. If you follow the instructions exactly, the results WILL undoubtedly be SUCCESSFUL! * ABOVE ALL, HAVE FAITH IN YOURSELF AND KNOW YOU WILL SUCCEED! *******YOUR SUCCESS GUIDELINE******* Follow these guidelines to guarantee your success: If you don't receive 10 to 20 orders for REPORT #1 within two weeks, continue advertising until you do. Then, a couple of weeks later you should receive at least 100 orders for REPORT #2. If you don't, continue advertising until you do. Once you have received 100 or more orders for REPORT #2, YOU CAN RELAX, because the system is already working for you, and the cash will continue to roll in! THIS IS IMPORTANT TO REMEMBER: Every time your name is moved down on the list, you are placed in front of a DIFFERENT report. You can KEEP TRACK of your PROGRESS by watching which report people are ordering from you. If you want to generate more income, send another batch of e-mails and start the whole process again! There is no limit to the income you will generate from this business! NOTE: If you need help with starting a business, registering a business name, how income tax is handled, etc., contact your local office of the Small Business Administration (a Federal agency) for free help and answers to questions. Also, the Internal Revenue Service offers free help via telephone and free seminars about business taxes. *******T E S T I M O N I A L S******* This program does work, but you must follow it EXACTLY! Especially the rule of not trying to place your name in a different position, it won't work and you'll lose a lot of potential income. I'm living proof that it works. It really is a great opportunity to make relatively easy money, with little cost to you. If you do choose to participate, follow the program exactly, and you'll be on your way to financial security. Sean McLaughlin, Jackson, MS My name is Frank. My wife, Doris, and I live in Bel-Air, MD. I am a cost accountant with a major U.S. Corporation and I make pretty good money. When I received the program I grumbled to Doris about receiving "junk mail." I made fun of the whole thing, spouting my knowledge of the population and percentages involved. I "knew" it wouldn't work. Doris totally ignored my supposed intelligence and jumped in with both feet. I made merciless fun of her, and was ready to lay the old "I told you so" on her when the thing didn't work... well, the laugh was on me! Within two weeks she had received over 50 responses. Within 45 days she had received over $147,200 in $5 bills! I was shocked! I was sure that I had it all figured and that it wouldn't work. I AM a believer now. I have joined Doris in her "hobby." I did have seven more years until retirement, but I think of the "rat race" and it's not for me. We owe it all to MLM. Frank T., Bel-Air, MD I just want to pass along my best wishes and encouragement to you. Any doubts you have will vanish when your first orders come in. I even checked with the U.S. Post Office to verify that the plan was legal. It definitely is! IT WORKS!!! Paul Johnson, Raleigh, NC The main reason for this letter is to convince you that this system is honest, lawful, extremely profitable, and is a way to get a large amount of money in a short time. I was approached several times before I checked this out. I joined just to see what one could expect in return for the minimal effort and money required. To my astonishment, I received $36,470.00 in the first 14 weeks, with money still coming in. Sincerely yours, Phillip A. Brown, Esq. Not being the gambling type, it took me several weeks to make up my mind to participate in this plan. But conservative that I am, I decided that the initial investment was so little that there was just no way that I wouldn't get enough orders to at least get my money back. Boy, was I surprised when I found my medium-size post office box crammed with orders! For awhile, it got so overloaded that I had to start picking up my mail at the window. I'll make more money this year than any 10 years of my life before. The nice thing about this deal is that it doesn't matter where in the U.S. the people live. There simply isn't a better investment with a faster return. Mary Rockland, Lansing, MI I had received this program before. I deleted it, but later I wondered if I shouldn't have given it a try. Of course, I had no idea who to contact to get another copy, so I had to wait until I was e-mailed another program...11 months passed then it came...I didn't delete this one!...I made more than $41,000 on the first try!! D. Wilburn, Muncie, IN This is my third time to participate in this plan. We have quit our jobs, and will soon buy a home on the beach and live off the interest on our money. The only way on earth that this plan will work for you is if you do it. For your sake, and for your family's sake don't pass up this golden opportunity. Good luck and happy spending! Charles Fairchild, Spokane, WA ORDER YOUR REPORTS TODAY AND GET STARTED ON YOUR ROAD TO FINANCIAL FREEDOM!!! When you are ready for a bulk e-mailer call Smith International at 352-629-7695. They do good work. You can send an e-mail to their autoresponder at popcorn(a)mfi.net. Just click on the blue letters and enter the words "Bulk Email Info" in the Subject Line and in the body of the letter and then click on the Send Now button. All remove requests sent to the above address will receive an autoresponded informational flyer. E-mail addresses are recorded at that site. They were charging only $210 for 100,000 TRUE AOL addresses.

1 0

Get the MONEY You Need
by moneyhelp＠mymail.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

GET THE MONEY YOU NEED RIGHT NOW! Here's your chance to... > Eliminate Credit Card Debt! > Escape from High Monthly Payments! > Get Relief and Have the Money You Need! > Cash in Your Pocket Usually within 7 to 14 days! > Make Home Improvements You've Always Wanted! > Take the Vacation You Deserve! How? Simply CLICK HERE TO VISIT OUR WEBSITE! or type or cut & paste: http://www.canus.net/amcap/146.html in your browser Would you like money for... ~ A New Car? ~ College Tuition? ~ Taxes? ~ Consolidate Your Credit Cards? ~ A Dream Vacation? ~ Home Improvements? Now It Can Be Yours! What are you waiting for? For a FREE evaluation please visit our website by... CLICKING HERE (http://www.canus.net/amcap/146.html) or type or cut & paste: http://www.canus.net/amcap/146.html in your browser Especially if you're a homeowner, we can help you. Try us!

1 0

Jim Bell Violation Update
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Jim Bell was released on parole on April 20, but may be about to be rearrested for parole violation, and may not yet know the cops are coming to reviolate: http://jya.com/jdb062198.htm

1 0

Eric Young: Zimmerman redux?
by Trei, Peter 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Date: 20 Jun 1998 18:40:14 -0000 From: Julian Assange <proff(a)iq.org> To: ukcrypto(a)maillist.ox.ac.uk With things starting to heat up here in Australia (DoD/DSD has recently taken to making some exceptionally nasty noises about prosecuting Eric Young, Tim Hudson and the rest of the Australian CryptoMozilla team). I'd like to remind everyone who's interested in aussie/nz crypto issues of the aucrypto mailing list. <snip> Australasian & Pacific Cryptography mail the word "subscribe" to aucrypto-request(a)suburbia.net

2 1

#cypherpunks open
by Lucky Green 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

#cypherpunks is open on EFnet. -- Lucky Green <mailto:shamrock@netcom.com> PGP encrypted mail preferred "I do believe that where there is a choice only between cowardice and violence, I would advise violence." Mahatma Gandhi

1 0

Judicial Misconduct at Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Monday 6/22/98 1:02 PM Senate Judiciary Committee http://www.senate.gov/committee/judiciary.html Republicans Orrin G. Hatch, Utah, Chairman senator_hatch(a)Hatch.senate.gov Strom Thurmond, South Carolina senator(a)thurmond.senate.gov Charles E. Grassley, Iowa chuck_grassley(a)grassley.senate.gov Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania senator_specter(a)specter.senate.gov Fred Thompson, Tennessee senator_thompson(a)thompson.senate.gov Jon Kyl, Arizona info(a)kyl.senate.gov Mike DeWine, Ohio senator_dewine(a)dewine.senate.gov John Ashcroft, Missouri john_ashcroft(a)ashcroft.senate.gov Spencer Abraham, Michigan michigan(a)abraham.senate.gov Jeff Sessions, Alabama Democrats Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov Joseph R.Biden, Jr., Delaware senator(a)biden.senate.gov Herb Kohl, Wisconsin senator_kohl(a)kohl.senate.gov Dianne Feinstein, California senator(a)feinstein.senate.gov Russell D. Feingold, Wisconsin russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov Richard Durbin, Illinois dick(a)durbin.senate.gov Robert Torricelli, New Jersey senator(a)torricelli.senate.gov Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis and help get this matter settled. Thursday March 30, 1995 I wrote Tenth Circuit clerk Hoecker to request a copy of the docket sheets for case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al Hoecker did not answer my letter. On Tuesday March 5,1996 I wrote Judge Lucius D. Bunton to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. On Monday September 23, 1996 Arthur R Morales and I wrote Henry A. Politz, Chief Judge U.S. Court of Appeals - Fifth Circuit to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets of my case and Morales Tenth Circuit case 95-2204. Tenth Circuit also refused to send Morales copies of docket sheets for his case. Politz is Bunton's boss. No response. Friday May 30, 1997 I wrote Antonin Scalia to get this help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. 5 May 1998 citizen John Young finds docket sheets on Source: PACER, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, 1-800-279-9107 and posts them on Internet at http://jya.com/whp-10usca.htm Docket as of April 10, 1998 0:05 am Proceedings include all events. 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al shows that I filed my Brief of the Appellant on 2/19/95. 2/23/95 [835344] Appellant's brief filed by William H. Payne. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 2/19/95 Oral argument? pro se. Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95 for Thomas P. Wright, for Robert Surran, for Paul A. Stokes, for Mary J. Stang, for Tommy A. Sellers, for Craig A. Searls, for Albert Narath, for Preston B. Herrington, for Peter S. Hamilton, for Roger L. Hagengruber, for James R. Gosler, for Harold L. Folley, for Robert L. Ewing, for C. William Childers, for Harvey J. Brewster, for Sandia Corporation (mbm) mbm writes "Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95" Sandia had sent me a copy of its brief by 3/28/96. I filed attached MOTION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT'S DEMANDS ON BASIS THAT DEFENDANT-APPELLEES FAILED TO FILE BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 31 on Tuesday the 28th day of March, 1995 My February 28 MOTION at the Tenth Circuit is filed WITHOUT notice of service logged. 4/4/95 [845484] Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief. Original and 3 copies c/s: y (mbm) In 1995 FRAP 25 (a) stated "[b]riefs shall be deemed filed on the day of mailing if the most expeditious form of delivery by mail, excepting special delivery, is used." FRAP 25 has been changed by 1998 to http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Since I mailed Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief on 3/28/98, it is likely Sandia's lawyer Friedman received it 3/29/95. Tenth Circuit logs 3/30/95 [844759] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia Corporation, Harvey J. Brewster, C. William Childers, Robert L. Ewing, Harold L. Folley, James R. Gosler, Roger L. Hagengruber, Peter S. Hamilton, Preston B. Herrington, Albert Narath, Craig A. Searls, Tommy A. Sellers, Mary J. Stang, Paul A. Stokes, Robert Surran, Thomas P. Wright. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 3/27/95 Oral Argument? y (appellant is pro se) Appellant's optional reply brief due 4/13/95 for William H. Payne (mbm) Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure [FRAP] 26 (c) states (c) Additional Time after Service. When a party is required or permitted to act within a prescribed period after service of a paper upon that party, 3 calendar days are added to the prescribed period unless the paper is delivered on the date of service stated in the proof of service. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#26c While the Tenth Circuit ASSERTS Appellees brief was, in fact, served on 3/27/95 evidence given below points to the brief was served, in fact, on 3/29/95. I allege that Friedman affixed a false date of service to Sandia's brief. I WAS NEVER PROPERLY SERVED. I wrote Wednesday March 29, 1995 Dan Friedman Simons, Cuddy & Friedman Pecos Trail Office Compound 1701 Old Pecos Trail POB 4160 Santa Fe, NM 87502-4160 505-988-4476 505-984-1807 FAX Dear Lawyer Friedman: Today at 14:00 hours I found a green and white about 9x13 inch envelope in our mail box at my home. Mailing label indicated that the envelope came from your firm. CONFIDENTIAL was stamped on the mailing label. I wrote "Received at 14:00 hours on W 3/29/95 with no POSTMARK OR STAMP by W. H. Payne" at the bottom of the envelope. There was no STAMP OR POSTAGE METER LABEL or POSTMARK on the envelope. Therefore, I gave the envelope to US Postal Service supervisor Mel at 14:49 hours today at the Postal Receiving station at 9904 Montgomery, NW in Albuquerque. Mel has a copy of the cover of the envelope with Mel's note written on it. Mel told me the post office was going to return the envelope to your firm for proper mailing. I ask: 1 What did this envelope contain? Please identify the documents precisely. 2 If any Certificates of Service were included in the envelope, then what were the dates affixed to these documents? 3 Who placed this envelope in our mail box? Lawyer Friedman: It appears you missed an important filing date. And are in the process of attempt to correct your failure. But may be using illegitimate methods to conceal your failure. Please respond as soon as possible so that we all may discover what has happened here." ... Lawyer Friedman did not respond to the above letter. But Friedman did mail me Appellees brief many days later in envelope showing TRUE MAILING date. Certificate of service on received Appellees brief did not reflect postmark date. 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 But Tenth Circuit clerks Fisher and Hoecker despite my protests and submission of evidence may have stamped FILED on Sandia's IMPROPERLY SERVED Appellee/Respondent's brief according to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Laywer Friedman FALSIFIED THE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Friedman DID NOT MAIL ME "Served on 3/27/95." d) Proof of Service; Filing. A paper presented for filing shall contain an acknowledgment of service by the person served or proof of service in the form of a statement of the date and manner of service, of the name of the person served, and of the addresses to which the papers were mailed or at which they were delivered, certified by the person who made service. Proof of service may appear on or be affixed to the papers filed. When a brief or appendix is filed by mailing or dispatch in accordance with Rule 25(a)(2)(B), the proof of service shall also state the date and manner by which the document was mailed or dispatched to the clerk. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Crime apparently committed by Hoecker and Fisher is § 1017. Government seals wrongfully used and instruments wrongfully sealed Whoever fraudulently or wrongfully affixes or impresses the seal of any department or agency of the United States, to or upon any certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper or with knowledge of its fraudulent character, with wrongful or fraudulent intent, uses, buys, procures, sells, or transfers to another any such certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper, to which or upon which said seal has been so fraudulently affixed or impressed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1017.shtml Despite my protests of judicial misconduct Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis award decision to Sandia 10/6/95 [890055] Order filed by Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis "...All outstanding motions are denied..." (found in Order & Judgment of 10/6/95) [879579-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) when these judges should not have had Appellees brief before them. Then in an apparently attempt to conceal what happened 10/6/95 [890076] NOTE: THIS ENTIRE CASE IS SEALED. Terminated on the Merits after Submission Without Oral Hearing; Judgment Affirmed; Written, Signed, Unpublished. Moore, authoring judge; Barrett; Weis. [94-2205] (pdw) I WON MY APPEAL, pro se, ON A TECHNICALITY but judges Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis awarded the win to Sandia Labs! Members of Congress, judicial misconduct in this matter has been well-documented. Court records filed with the Tenth Circuit. But CURRENTLY under seal. Lawyers involved in this matter attempt to use the legal strategy of IGNORE and STONEWALL to attempt to deny me justice. Ignoring and stonewalling by lawyers forced Morales and me to seek visibility so lawyers could no longer ignore and stonewall. Lawyer attitude apparently is that they ignore rules of civil procedure or even the law so long as their actions are invisible to public scrutiny. Visibility was achieved by suing the National Security Agency which revealed even more judicial misconduct http://www.jya.com/whp052898.htm. I would like to settle all matters involved with this unfortunate cyrpto-related matter, which includes criminal violations of the Privacy Act. DOE lawyer Steve Dillingham asked me to prepare a settlement offer in 1994. I wrote a settlement letter May 22, 1994 to Dillingham. Nothing happened. June 11, 1998 I made several modifications to my 1994 settlement letter and sent it e-mail to Robert Nordhaus, Chief Counsel, DOE. I ask that you 1 help with settlement of my six-year-old since I won my appeal at the Tenth Circuit, 2 investigate Tenth Circuit case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al to bring the guilty to justice. Sincerely william payne 505 292 7037 I am not reading e-mail http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html Coauthor Lewis in the above is one of my former MS and PhD students in computer science. http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ Monday 6/22/98 1:04 PM Members of Congress Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan and request a congressional investigation. After several years, with Payne, of trying to get Tenth Circuit to send docket sheets from my case, citizen John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm locates docket sheets and posts them Morales Case Dockets 10th USCA June 12, 1998 on Internet at http://www.jya.com/arm061298.htm. Source: Online records Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals via PACER GENERAL DOCKET FOR Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 95-2204 Filed: 9/29/95 Nsuit: 3440 Morales v. Sandia National Lab. Appeal from: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico I filed 11/9/95 [898274] Appellant's brief filed by Arthur R. Morales. Original and 2 copies. c/s: y. Served on 11/7/95. Oral argument? pro se. Appellee's brief due 12/11/95 for Sandia National Lab. (pdw) Sandia files its FIRST ATTEMPT at 12/11/95 [905033] Appellee's deficient brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Appellee's corrected brief due 12/21/95 for Sandia National Lab. additional copies received 12/11/95. (fg) Tenth Circuit court clerk Patrick Fisher writes Wells on December 11, 1995 concerning Sandia's deficient brief [C]orrections, however made, must be accompanied by proof of service upon all other parties to the appeal. ... and issues 12/14/95 [905975] FIRST notice of rules violation for Deborah D. Wells for Appellee Sandia National Lab. (sls) Wells submits 12/21/95 [907974] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 Oral Argument? n Appellant's optional reply brief due 1/8/96 for Arthur R. Morales (mbm) but DOES NOT serve me with a copy. Wells later admits in 2/1/96 [917660] Response filed by Sandia National Lab. Appellant/Petitioner motion to clarify Original and 3 copies. c/s: y response Null Relief Code (fg) Certificate of Service date 30th day of January, 1996, [h]ad Appellant simply made a phone call to the Tenth Circuit, he could have established that the Defendant-Appellee's corrected brief was indeed filed on a timely basis, ... I protested by filing 1/3/96 [909965] Appellant's motion "for the Court to Grant Appeal" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909966] Appellant's motion "for New Trial" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909967] Appellant's motion "to Discipline Defendant-Appellee" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) because Sandia did not properly serve me in violation of Fisher's December 11, 1995 order. The Tenth Circuit court of appeals should NOT, by its own rules, filed Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 And is doubtful whether court clerk Fisher had any authority under appellate procedure to permit Wells to correct her deficient brief. Rather Sandia's brief did not comply with with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and should have been summarily rejected for filing. I WON, pro se, my appeal to the Tenth circuit on a technicality but Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan awarded the win to Sandia Labs. 4/2/96 [932848] Order filed by Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan denying parties' motions for general relief(found in Order and Judgment of 4/2/96)--"...During the course of this appeal, the parties have filed various motions for dismissal, summary grant, and sanctions. We find no merit to any of these motions, and they are [920851-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) by accepting and judging on a documents which was not permitted to be before the court by its own rules. Judicial misconduct in my case has been well-documented as it is in Payne's case. Payne and I speculate that similar judicial misconduct may have occurred at the Tenth Circuit. Sandia lawyer Robert J Park wrote me a settlement letter on Feb 18, 1998. I filled in the blanks and made minor handwritten chages and returned it on February 22, 1998. But my offer has not yet been accepted. I ask that you 1 help have my settlement offer accepted, 2 investigate judicial misconduct in case 95-2204 and punish the guilty. Some citizens can only express such frustrations with the US court system with violence. I seek change by legal reform. Sincerely Arthur R Morales 505 345 1381

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - June 22, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

======================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon for the most important news in wireless communications today. ========================================

1 0

Verisign & NAI Join Forces, PGP out the door?
by Steve Orrin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

To all: Word is the PGP is being dropped as a standard and NAI converting over to x.509 throughout product line. However the info is vague wnough to mean alot of things:) sorrin NETWORK ASSOCIATES AND VERISIGN PARTNER TO PROVIDE INTEROPERABLE 6/22/98 13:18 Digital Certificate Solutions to Millions of Users Worldwide Partnership Provides Customers Choice of Leading Certificate Formats, Enabling Widespread Secure Internet Business Transactions MOUNTAIN VIEW and SANTA CLARA, Calif., June 22 /PRNewswire/ -- VeriSign, Inc. (Nasdaq: VRSN), and Network Associates (Nasdaq: NETA), today announced a broad reaching partnership to enable cross product support and promotion of each company's digital certificate-based security solutions. This partnership will provide customers with a flexible security solution that encompasses best-of-breed products and technologies -- enabling secure global electronic commerce and business-to-business communications on a larger scale than ever before. With this announcement, Network Associates and VeriSign can tap into the world's largest community of certificate holders made up of over one thousand five hundred enterprises and nearly nine million individuals throughout the world. This integration of the world's leading certificate technologies will enable businesses to utilize their choice of certificate formats while conducting secure Internet transactions such as: exchanging secure e-mail, establishing virtual private networks, and authorized access to confidential corporate data. Network Associates and VeriSign customers will now be able to establish combined PKI solutions covering the complete lifecycle of certificates from issuance and usage through renewal, expiration, or revocation. The first commercial offering from this collaboration will be interoperable between the Gauntlet GVPN product and VeriSign OnSite for IPSEC, which will be available in the third quarter. In the fourth quarter VeriSign's OnSite service and toolkit will be enhanced to issue DSA X.509 certificates in addition to its RSA X.509 certificates, and Network Associates' Net Tools Secure, including their industry leading PGP encryption products, will be updated to request and use either type of certificate. "By joining the two largest players in the industry to ensure that our customers' security applications are seamlessly compatible, we are fueling the growth of electronic commerce and secure communications on the Internet," said Peter Watkins general manager of the Net Tools Secure division at Network Associates. "We are pleased to offer VeriSign as our preferred provider of digital certificate services. Together, we are the only two companies to support the full range of certificate standards -- giving customers the power of choice when implementing their open, certificate-based security solutions." "We are extremely pleased to work with Network Associates to bring enterprise customers a clear best-of-breed solution," said Stratton Sclavos, president and CEO of VeriSign. "With this partnership, users of Network Associates' desktop and server encryption applications can simply obtain their choice of digital certificates to establish a fully functional, interoperable PKI through the use of OnSite." "The announcement from VeriSign and Network Associates is a win-win situation for Information Systems (IS) decision makers," said Jim Hurley, director of information security at Aberdeen Group, a Boston-based IS market-research, consulting and analysis firm. "One supplier helps IS managers by managing risk while the other helps IS managers by enabling safe interconnections with suppliers, partners and customers for mission business-procedures. Interoperable and seamless support between these supplier's products is the kind of partnership that IS executives will reward." VeriSign OnSite, a state of the art digital certificate solution that enables organizations to quickly and easily establish themselves as a certificate authority, is available today for client and server digital certificates and will be available for IPSec digital certificates in the third quarter. VeriSign OnSite pricing begins at $4995 for 1000 client certificates. Network Associates' Net Tools Secure suite is the industry's most comprehensive set of security products encompassing enterprise encryption, authentication, intrusion detection, audit analysis, anti-virus, firewall, global virtual private network and network vulnerability assessment. Net Tools Secure is available now and is priced at $49 per user for 5000 users. Network Associates, Inc. With headquarters in Santa Clara, California, Network Associates, Inc., formed by the merger of McAfee Associates and Network General, is a leading supplier of enterprise network security and management solutions. Network Associates' Net Tools Secure and Net Tools Manager offer best-of-breed, suite-based network security and management solutions. Net Tools Secure and Net Tools Manager suites combine to create Net Tools, which centralizes these point solutions within an easy-to-use, integrated systems management environment. For more information, Network Associates can be reached at 408-988-3832 or on the Internet at http://www.nai.com. VeriSign, Inc. is the leading provider of digital certificate solutions used by enterprises, Web sites and consumers to conduct secure communications and transactions over the Internet and private networks. VeriSign's Digital IDs and Secure Server IDs are available through the company's Web site at http://www.verisign.com. VeriSign's E-Commerce Solutions are used by enterprises to deploy complete Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) solutions for intranets, extranets, and large-scale electronic commerce applications, and are available through VeriSign regional account representatives or through VeriSign resellers. For more information visit VeriSign's Web site at http://www.verisign.com. SOURCE Network Associates, Inc. -0- 06/22/98 /CONTACT: Nathan Tyler of Copithorne & Bellows, 415-975-2223, for Network Associates; or Kelly Ryan of VeriSign, 650-429-3424/ /Company News On-Call: http://www.prnewswire.com or fax, 800-758-5804, ext. 124004/ /Web site: http://www.verisign.com http://www.nai.com/ (NETA VRSN) CO: Network Associates, Inc.; VeriSign, Inc. ST: California IN: CPR MLM SU: PDT -0- (PRN) Jun/22/98 13:03 EOS (PRN) Jun/22/98 13:03 86 -0- (PRN) Jun/22/ 98 13:18

1 0

Entrust goes Public
by Steve Orrin 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

> Entrust filed to go public.

1 0

Just for You
by Nicole 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

<HTML><PRE><BODY BGCOLOR="#000000"> Hi... This message is meant for Adults over the age of 21, If you have received this message in error, please delet it now and accept our appologies. I would like to tell of about this great sex site on the web, offering everything you will ever desire. It has live sex chat and a live sex xhow from Amsterdam. Go and check it out. http://www.sex4u.net/ Love Anna

1 0

Blood Sausage -- SPACE ALIENS HIDE MY DRUGS!!!
by Linda Reed--PCC West Campus CSC 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

BloodSausage HogLog - SPACE ALIENS HIDE M DRUGS!!! ___________________________________________________ "The lives of Frank, Gambino, Morel and Serafini ended on the gallows of Montreal's Bordeaux Jail on October 24, 1924. Valentino and Davis had their executions commuted at the last minute." "No one claimed Frank, Gambino and Valentino were among the half-dozen gunmen who ambushed the bank car, but prosecutorn R.L. Calder argued they were still guilty of murder because of the organized nature of the crime." ~Excerpts from "Blood Brothers" by Peter Edwards. MeTheSheeple was glad to learn that these vile, criminal scumbags, fingered by the person who had actually planned and committed the crime, were held accountable for the actions alleged to them by the gang-leader whose life was spared in return for ratting out alleged coconspirators. I was particularly happy because I knew that the same high standards of justice would undoubtedly be applied to the criminal scum within the Canadian Justice System under whose PigSkin Umbrella the Montreal Mobsters ruled the streets and the citizens who walked them. "Testimony at the Frank robbery trial showed that police routinely sipped coffee with hoods and that Montreal's finest had been tipped off to the armoured car hold-up well in advance, but did nothing." Supreme Court of Canada Justice Louise Coderre (with a left-handed frog-tongue over the first 'e') said, "Vice has spread itself across the city with an ugliness that seemed assured of impunity." Rather than bore you with all of the details behind the criminal scumbag PigsWithBadgesAndGuns being also found 'GUILT OF MURDER BECAUSE OF THE ORGANIZED NATURE OF THE CRIME', I will just skip ahead in the book and report on the final outcome of <trumpets blare> JUSTICE <flags fly> in the case of the police and city officials discovered to have greased the wheels of organized crime in their activities of drug dealing, robbery, murder, etc. Hmmm....nope...nada....maybe...nope...nope... Surprise, surprise! It seems that, following the Coderre probe, "nothing happened that seriously threatened the criminals' take. The name of Cadiex Street was changed to de Bullion Street after a New ork play made the old name notorious, but along the same pavement the same crimes continued." Those without my cynical psychological make-up will undoubtedly be able to supply you with reasons as to just why the local citizens felt extremely 'served and protected' when they came to after being mugged and saw the new street signs, however, I will merely take a short break, here, have a good dump, and wipe my butt with yet another page of the Criminal Code of Canada. And Silk Badges..?: "I know who the real public enemies are. But they are men who have the respect of the public; men who wear silk hats, who are apparently of standing in the community." ~1930's Montreal MobBuster, J.J. Penverne (with no frog-licks in his name...) Peter Edwards provides the standard journalistic explaination as to how "The term 'Mafia,' in its truest form, refers only to organized crime in western Sicily." and explains how it has been expanded to encompass any pair of teenagers throwing a rock through a window, as long as one of them has an Italian name. He neglects to explain, as some journalists do, that the word "Mafia" is becoming increasingly generic, now including the 'Lebanese Mafia', the 'Columbian Mafia', etc. *All* journalists, however, seem unable to explain why they continue to avoid naming the continuing organized forces of armed domination over citizens of *all* ethnic groups the 'Government Mafia'... "Blood Brothers" is not the first book to point out that at the heart of the "honoured society of Calabria" lies the concept of "omerta" (with a right-handed strand of spaghetti over the 'a'). Nor is it the first book to fail to point out that omerta's "double code of conduct that set different moral codes for dealings with those inside and outside one's family circle" applies not only to Officially Recognized Criminal ScumBag Organizations, but also to almost every 'gang' larger than a Cult Of One from the PTA to the CIA to the USA. 'Omerta' decrees that when the president of the PTA molests a child, when the head of the CIA commits treason, when the president of the USA declares that US citizens will continue to face imprisonment for exporting the same strength of encryption that their government is sharing with Communist China, that a street somewhere be renamed, while everything else continues on pretty much as before. Don't hold your breath waiting for mainstream journalists to upset the BadAppleCart by referring to the 'PTA Mafia' when they deem that your child should be forced to attend school with a child who can murder them by biting them, while teaching them that you are a dangerous psycho because of your gun ownership; or to the 'FBI Mafia' when they murder a mother and child in attempts to cover their previous unannounced, botched armed assault on a citizen being charged with civil crimes in an attempt to persuade him to invent crimes against his friends, whether they were Jewish or not; or to the 'Government Mafia' when they spend millions of dollars investigating and/or charging Phil Zimmerman, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates, Jim Bell, knowing that the bottomless taxpayer pockets funding their legally unjustified harassment will guarantee at least moderately successful results, even if the end result is dropping the matter when the multi- million dollar stench begins blowing back toward DC. Do not expect mainstream journalists to refer to the 'ASPCA Mafia' when they release a hastily composed 'history' of TruthMongrel as a rabid, sharp-toothed, human baby conniseur, after HeOrShe is cut down by FBI gunfire on Mayonaisse Mountain during attempts to arrest the Author on 'Dog At Large' charges filed by the Royal Canadian Mounted Police in Bienfait, Sask. Silk? We Don't Need No Stinking Silk...: The multi-facted PigsEar WebSites that are increasingly being turned into InterNet Cult of One SilkPurses through the increasingly efficient and powerful shareware digital bread-slicers available to Jane and Joe Sheeple in their quest to serve either God, Mammon, Dog or Mammy, according to their prediliction, have the capacity, if uncensored and uncontrolled, of allowing the individual to rekindle the creative spark of individuality that reminds them that the word 'WE' should only be used by Kings, Priests, and people with tapeworms. People with the ability to think for themselves; people who know that if Timothy McVeigh was really the 'Muenster' that the mainstream media claimed, then he would have been in the 'Adams Family' movie; people who demand to know if Monica Lewinski has a 'bent' pussy; people with conspiring minds, who want to 'snow'; people who are not afraid to stand up and cheer for the Officially Recognized BadGuys on 'Cops' and 'World's Scariest Innocent Bystander Threatening Police Chases'; people watching 'World's Dumbest Criminals' who slap their forehead and say, "I hate it when that happens..." People who read the Bienfait Nutly News.

1 0

CTIA Daily News From WOW-COM - June 22, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

======================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon for the most important news in wireless communications today. ========================================

1 0

Jim Bell Rearrested
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

JY note: The message below has not been authenticated. The writer claimed no knowledge of the arrest at the time I spoke with him, which was after the date and time of the arrest given in the message. It's possible he was withholding the information for publication or by request of confidentiality. The message may be a forgery written after seeing the messages at http://jya.com/jdb062198.htm. The IRS has sent spam concerning Jim Bell before: http://jya.com/irs-spam.htm. From: Anonymous 3 Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 23:31:33 EDT To: jya(a)pipeline.com Subject: Jim Bell and anon John: This is [a journalist] whom you called today about Bell. He was arrested at his parents' home in Vancouver Monday about 1:07 a.m. PDT by five federal marshals in two cars. The agents went in with guns drawn and came out with Bell's elderly parents, with whom they talked for a while. A few minutes later, they brought out Jim, who was handcuffed in front, dressed in a blue T- shirt and slacks. He was put in the back of a red Jeep, and then leg chained by an agent. (I tried to ask one of the agents if Jim was going to be taken directly to Tacoma - my assumption - but the agent was a typical marshals service jerk and just told me to stay away.) Jim was in the backseat for about 20 minutes and then two agents came out and drove him away - after one agent accidentally set off the Jeep "wa-wa" siren - ...just as TV arrived. the other three agents remained in the house, looking for "evidence," i assume. I expect him to appear before a federal magistrate in Tacoma tomorrow morning. His federal defender still has not been provided any paper by the govt. so, now yr up to date. on another matter, I was curious abt the anonymous info sent you. i've been trying to get an anon remailer for some time, but have been unsuccessful. got any tips, advice or help?

2 2

Anonymicer
by Alex `Taker` Pircher 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Protect your Privacy for FREE! http://anonymicer.home.ml.org/ (or http://anonymicer.home.pages.de/) * Surf anonymously - http://anonymicer.home.ml.org/ * Send anonymous Emails - http://anonymicer.home.ml.org/email/ * Post anonymous Messages into Newsgroups - http://anonymicer.home.ml.org/news/ Fast - Easy - Free Greetz, Taker pircher(a)informatik.tu-muenchen.de

1 0

CTIA Daily News From WOW-COM
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

======================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon for the most important news in wireless communications today. ========================================

1 0

NSA Declassifies Algos
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Thanks to Ed Roback, NIST: http://www.defenselink.mil/news/Jun1998/b06231998_bt316-98.html DoD Press Release, June 23, 1998: No. 316-78 IMMEDIATE RELEASE June 23, 1998 (703)695-0192(media) (703)697-5737(public/industry) ENCRYPTION FORMULAS DECLASSIFIED The Department of Defense today announced the decision by the National Security Agency to declassify both the Key Exchange Algorithm and the SKIPJACK encryption algorithm used in the FORTEZZA(tm) personal computer card. FORTEZZA(tm) provides security at the desktop in the Defense Message System and other DoD applications. This marks the first time that the NSA has declassified such information and made it commercially available. This declassification is an essential part of the Department of Defense's efforts to work with commercial industry in developing reasonably priced computer protection products. This declassification decision will enable industry to develop software and smartcard based security products, which are interoperable with FORTEZZA(tm). The availability of such products will enhance the protection of DoD's sensitive but unclassified and critical non-mission communications. The decision to release SKIPJACK (an 80 bit encryption algorithm that is not extensible to higher key lengths) and KEA (a 1024 bit key exchange algorithm) is restricted to these particular algorithms, and does not apply to other classified NSA algorithms. The SKIPJACK and KEA algorithms and their source codes have been declassified pursuant to Executive Order 12958. Vendors interested in obtaining more information on this matter should contact the National Security Agency Public Affairs Office at 301-688-6524. [End] ----- Note: We called NSA Public Affairs who said that more information will be available tomorrow afternoon on NIST's Web site (no specific URL): http://www.nist.gov In the meantime NSA will respond to faxed questions; send to: Vanessa Talieri Office of Public Affairs National Security Agency Fax: 301-497-2844

1 0

PGPdisk for win95/98?
by jkthomson 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Great, so I finally get around to checking PGP's betaweb, and to my amazement, they finally have a beta version of PGPdisk for 95. Too bad it claims that I need to contact a sales rep, and when I follow their link, I get nothing that would really point me in the right direction. Any of you manage to get your hands on a copy? Currently, I am using bestcrypt NP with blowfish. I am a little concerned with this however, As I have never seen a crypto-review of the software, and their website is not too forthcoming with technical details, or known attacks. Does anyone have information (or horror stories) from using bestcrypt? --------------------------------------------------------------- james 'keith' thomson <jkthomson(a)bigfoot.com> ICQ:746241 jkthomson: C181 991A 405C EAFB 2C46 79B5 B1DC DB78 8196 122D http://www.bigfoot.com/~ceildh <keys> at pgp.mit.edu --------------------------------------------------------------- You can lead a man to slaughter, but you can't make him think. ================================================================

2 1

Creating Wealth In America
by unknown＠example.com 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Creating Wealth in America >From the desk of Robert Allen, The Author of 2 Mega Best-Sellers, Nothing Down and Creating Wealth in America San Diego, California 11:29 P.M. "I can't sleep until I get this off my chest." "I'm extremely frustrated". Odds are that nine out of ten people who receive this letter will discard it without a second thought. Yet, I know that I have discovered a secret that could change your financial life forever! And I'm willing to share it with you for FREE. Do you want to end your money pressures forever? Do you want to double your income? Do you want to build an extra stream of income quickly? If you answered yes, then let me show you how you can begin living your dreams, this year before it's too late. I'll get right to the point. As it says on the letterhead, my name is Robert Allen. I'm famous for my two #1 New York Times best-selling books. Nothing Down and Creating Wealth in America. There are lots of millionaires who credit their success to one of my books or seminars. So when I share this secret with you, I want you to know that I've done my homework. Here it comes. I have discovered what I believe is the perfect home-based business. Although I'm well known for real-estate investment books and seminars, this new business has absolutely nothing to do with real-estate. In fact, it's much easier and far less risky. It involves: -No employees -Little risk -Little start up cash -It's so simple, anyone can do it You could be earning $1,000 a week in as little as 90 days. One person I know went from zero to $3,000 a week in 60 days. That's $150,000 a year extra, hassle-free income! In my 20 years of research, I can honestly say, "I've never seen a faster, easier way to create a stream of income". I know this sounds too good to be true. Frankly, I didn't believe it myself at first. Finally, I agreed to check it out. As a test, I selected a small group of people and introduced them to this incredible opportunity. Almost immediately, many of them started earning profits. Within a week, many were earning incomes of $4,000 per month in net cash flow. Now, some of them are cashing checks for $3,000 a week. And this is just the beginning! Their earning potential could be unlimited! Would you like to learn how to do that? I'd love to show you how. But only if you're interested enough to make one telephone call. The number to call immediately is 1-888-267-4455. It's a 3-minute, 24-hour recorded message. This may be the answer you have been seeking. Warmly, Robert G. Allen P.S. I want to show you how to create extra streams of income quickly, Go to the phone and call now 1-888-267-4455. //

1 0

Re: Verisign & NAI Join Forces, PGP out the door? (fwd)
by Max Inux 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This is what I was able to find out about the Verisign/NAI partnership. -- Max Inux (MaxInux(a)bigfoot.com) UIN: 207447, http://khercs.chipware.net Strong Cryptography makes the world a safer place- PGP: 0x5CCFCA59 Or Kinky sex makes the world go round- Christie: Your in my sig too ^^ If Cryptography is outlawed, only outlaws will have cryptography ^^ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Tue, 23 Jun 1998 10:22:26 -0700 From: Jon Callas <jon(a)pgp.com> To: Max Inux <maxinux(a)bigfoot.com>, Sean_Paswater(a)nai.com Cc: chip(a)chipware.net, jon(a)pgp.com Subject: Re: Verisign & NAI Join Forces, PGP out the door? (fwd) At 08:10 PM 6/22/98 -0700, Max Inux wrote: Chip and Jon: Chip: Have any insight into this or is this gonna be like the TIS scare w/ Key Escrow? Jon: Since Chip will probably end up asking you or some of the other higher ups if he is unsure, Is there any truth to this story, or is this TIS #2? The tale is true -- it's the *interpretation* that's bogus. PGP is not out the door. PGP will be doing X.509 too. There's not a lot of difference between an X.509 certificate and a PGP key signature. They do the same thing. What you'll be able to do is have Verisign sign your key. The first steps of this are coming this fall -- you'll be able to drop an X.509 cert into your keyring and it will magically transform itself into a PGP key. At first, you'll only be able to use it with TLS (a.k.a. SSL), which is also coming this fall. Jon ----- Jon Callas jon(a)pgp.com CTO, Total Network Security 3965 Freedom Circle Network Associates, Inc. Santa Clara, CA 95054 (408) 346-5860 Fingerprints: D1EC 3C51 FCB1 67F8 4345 4A04 7DF9 C2E6 F129 27A9 (DSS) 665B 797F 37D1 C240 53AC 6D87 3A60 4628 (RSA)

2 1

QANTAS discriminates against Pauline Hanson's One Nation
by Global Web Builders 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Dear One Nation supporter in NSW, Qantas has banned coverage of Pauline Hanson and One Nation from inflight news. Qantas has effectively censored Channel 9's inflight coverage of Australian news and has, in effect, implied that there is something "distasteful" about Mrs Hanson and her political party. The action allegedly follows a complaint by a QANTAS staff member about coverage of Mrs Hanson being offensive to Indonesian passengers on an international flight. Pauline Hanson's political adviser, Mr David Oldfield, said it was "disgraceful, un-Australian activity asking Channel 9 to be political censors on behalf of Qantas. "Everything that is said publicly, people should have the right to judge for themselves whether something matters or doesn't," he said. "But it certainly isn't up to any airline or anyone else to decide that legitimate public debate isn't to be viewed." If you feel rightfully outraged by this act of censorship by Qantas (the Australian Airline) please contact them by email: qantasmedia(a)qantas.com.au I would encourage you to take a moment to express how you feel about this issue. Finally, please note Ansett have not undertaken censorship of this sort. GWB Scott Balson

1 0

Banning privacy: A radical proposal
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This came from Yahoo/ZDNet. Mr. Pappas suggests that we just ban anonymity and privacy to "protect the children." Now where have I heard that before? And yet again, the "Ethical Hackers Against Pedophilia" raise their heads, no pun intended. >Banning privacy: A radical proposal > >By Charles Pappas >June 22, 1998 >Yahoo! Internet Life > >Copyright (c) 1998 ZDNet > >Privacy and anonymity are our most cherished tenets of online life. A >need so immense that Marc Rotenberg of the Electronic Privacy >Information Center declared that we might need a kind of Department of >Privacy. He's not alone: 72 percent of surfers think there should be new >laws to protect their privacy. > >It's a radical, 180-degree turn to take, but...what if we're all wrong? >What if this belief that privacy + anonymity = social good has become as >self-destructive and delusional as a drunk who thinks one more scotch >will make him feel better? > >Like Marley's ghost, privacy may be coming back to haunt us. And that >ghost's name is pedophilia. How bad is it? Disguised as a 13-year-old, I >was directly propositioned on AOL in fewer than 10 minutes on each of >six separate attempts. I entered a chat room--usually called something >like "x9x10x11" or even "JonBenet Ramsey" (code words that alert >pedophiles where to swarm)--and waited for the assaults to start. > >Even when I didn't enter a chat room, the offers kept coming in from >pedophiles prowling for victims. One wanted to send me pictures of >himself. Another asked for a phone number. "I want to do my daughter," >one confessed to me. Later, when I searched for their screen names, they >had all disappeared into the anonymous electronic mist. > >AOL monitors kids' chat rooms continuously. (Parents can also set the >AOL software so their children can't use chat rooms.) "We have a >zero-tolerance policy when it comes to anything illegal," assures AOL >spokeswoman Tricia Primrose. "We have about 8,000 monitors scanning up >to 19,000 chat rooms, message boards, member profiles, and other areas. >When we get any kind of complaint, we immediately check it out. And >we're working with the FBI, customs, and other officials." > >It's not just AOL, of course. Child molesters "operate on every avenue >of the Net," says PhotonRain (not his real name) of Ethical Hackers >Against Pedophilia, a group that aids law enforcement in combating child >pornography. "WWW, newsgroups, IRC, ICQ, FTP servers..." > >We already know it's widespread and easy to encounter. But how often >have we heard--and parroted--the party line that problems on the Net >just reflect real-world problems, no more and no less? Holland slays >that sacred lamb: "The amount of pedophilia on the Net is extremely >disproportional to...society as a whole. They hide behind the anonymity >the Net offers. And they are aware of the small odds against being >caught." > >Ruben Rodriguez, director of the Exploited Child unit for the National >Center for Missing & Exploited Children (NCMEC), concurs: "The Net is so >anonymous that molesters are very comfortable on it. They can go in and >hunt kids down, and attempt five or six seductions at the same time." > >"Let's face it," says a New York State investigator who requests >anonymity, "the Net's anonymity enables the sickness. In a couple of >hours I could easily get 2,000 pictures if I wanted, including the Baby >Rape series," a popular collection of pedophilia photos whose name is >horrifyingly self-explanatory. > >In recent weeks, U.S. authorities have helped nab 60 online molesters, >while the FBI reports that its 3-year-old Innocent Images >investigation--an online task force identifying predators--has resulted >in 184 convictions. An impressive stat, but less than confidence >inspiring when research suggests the average child molester will have >more than 70 victims throughout his lifetime. > >At the same time we splash sex offenders' names online, our lawmakers >weigh in with proposed privacy law after privacy law. "No one wants to >give up privacy," says NCMEC's Rodriguez, whose organization now runs a >CyberTipline for leads on the sexual exploitation of children. "But what >do you do when your laws and protections are turned against you? >Something's got to give." > >But what? Our conventional wisdom that privacy is worth any risks? Just >touching this petrified opinion will get me slapped with a swastika--but >as philosopher Arthur Schopenhauer said, "All truth passes through three >stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, >it is accepted as being self-evident." > >To be continued--that's for certain. > >Copyright (c) 1998 ZDNet. All rights reserved.

4 3

Skipjack Up
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

John, The files are up, and hopefully all working OK. See http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/skipjack-kea.htm Ed Roback

1 0

nation's most secretive spy agency
by bill payne 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Wednesday 6/24/98 8:03 AM Glave I am reading http://www.wired.com/news/news/technology/story/13215.html I recevied a motion from US Assistant Attorney Mitchell yesterday in the mail. I haven't read it yet. Mitchell phoned on f 6/19. Mitchell told me she is moving to remand FOIA ALGORITHM request to NSA. I made a copy of the materials I received and sent them to John Young. I attach a copy of Morales and my complaint to the senate judiciary committee. This e-mail explains more about our interest in NSA. VISIBILITY. I do not have much interest in crypto. One of my problems is a REVERSE cyrpto problem. Trying to get people to read my geek books and obscure binary results. I MERELY BUILT CRYPTO DEVICES FOR NSA. And took a poke at NSA for trying to screw-up Sandia/DOE projects with bad crypto algorithm and implementation advice. http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm Especially in http://jya.com/da/whpda.htm#apps NSA has NO SENSE OF HUMOR. Pseudorandom numbers are close enough to crypto that I understand what the crypto people are doing. Morales and I want our money and out of this mess. Best Sincerely http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 Looks like we succeeded in getting others to read about the gfsr! In fact, Knuth included the gfsr on page 32 of his books series Art of Computer Programming: Vol 2 Seminumerical algorithms. This likely accounts for http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html Coauthor Lewis in the above is one of my former MS and PhD students in computer science. http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ Subject: Judicial Misconduct at Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Date: Mon, 22 Jun 1998 13:29:01 -0600 From: bill payne <billp(a)nmol.com> To: art morales <armoral(a)sandia.gov>, senator_hatch(a)Hatch.senate.gov, senator(a)thurmond.senate.gov, chuck_grassley(a)grassley.senate.gov, senator_specter(a)specter.senate.gov, senator_thompson(a)thompson.senate.gov, info(a)kyl.senate.gov, senator_dewine(a)dewine.senate.gov, john_ashcroft(a)ashcroft.senate.gov, michigan(a)abraham.senate.gov, senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov, senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov, senator(a)biden.senate.gov, senator_kohl(a)kohl.senate.gov, senator(a)feinstein.senate.gov, russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov, dick(a)durbin.senate.gov, senator(a)torricelli.senate.gov CC: steve dillingham <" Steven.Dillingham"@hq.doe.gov>, Robert Nordhaus <" Robert.Nordhaus"@hq.doe.gov>, mrgall(a)ix.netcom.com, jy(a)jya.com, art morales <armoral(a)sandia.gov>, federico pena <" Federico.F.Pena"@hq.doe.gov>, RJPARK(a)sandia.gov, cypherpunks(a)toad.com, ukcrypto(a)maillist.ox.ac.uk Monday 6/22/98 1:02 PM Senate Judiciary Committee http://www.senate.gov/committee/judiciary.html Republicans Orrin G. Hatch, Utah, Chairman senator_hatch(a)Hatch.senate.gov Strom Thurmond, South Carolina senator(a)thurmond.senate.gov Charles E. Grassley, Iowa chuck_grassley(a)grassley.senate.gov Arlen Specter, Pennsylvania senator_specter(a)specter.senate.gov Fred Thompson, Tennessee senator_thompson(a)thompson.senate.gov Jon Kyl, Arizona info(a)kyl.senate.gov Mike DeWine, Ohio senator_dewine(a)dewine.senate.gov John Ashcroft, Missouri john_ashcroft(a)ashcroft.senate.gov Spencer Abraham, Michigan michigan(a)abraham.senate.gov Jeff Sessions, Alabama Democrats Patrick J. Leahy, Vermont senator_leahy(a)leahy.senate.gov Edward M. Kennedy, Massachusetts senator(a)kennedy.senate.gov Joseph R.Biden, Jr., Delaware senator(a)biden.senate.gov Herb Kohl, Wisconsin senator_kohl(a)kohl.senate.gov Dianne Feinstein, California senator(a)feinstein.senate.gov Russell D. Feingold, Wisconsin russell_feingold(a)feingold.senate.gov Richard Durbin, Illinois dick(a)durbin.senate.gov Robert Torricelli, New Jersey senator(a)torricelli.senate.gov Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis and help get this matter settled. Thursday March 30, 1995 I wrote Tenth Circuit clerk Hoecker to request a copy of the docket sheets for case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al Hoecker did not answer my letter. On Tuesday March 5,1996 I wrote Judge Lucius D. Bunton to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. On Monday September 23, 1996 Arthur R Morales and I wrote Henry A. Politz, Chief Judge U.S. Court of Appeals - Fifth Circuit to ask his help to get a copy of the docket sheets of my case and Morales Tenth Circuit case 95-2204. Tenth Circuit also refused to send Morales copies of docket sheets for his case. Politz is Bunton's boss. No response. Friday May 30, 1997 I wrote Antonin Scalia to get this help to get a copy of the docket sheets. No response. 5 May 1998 citizen John Young finds docket sheets on Source: PACER, U.S. Court of Appeals, 10th Circuit, 1-800-279-9107 and posts them on Internet at http://jya.com/whp-10usca.htm Docket as of April 10, 1998 0:05 am Proceedings include all events. 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al shows that I filed my Brief of the Appellant on 2/19/95. 2/23/95 [835344] Appellant's brief filed by William H. Payne. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 2/19/95 Oral argument? pro se. Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95 for Thomas P. Wright, for Robert Surran, for Paul A. Stokes, for Mary J. Stang, for Tommy A. Sellers, for Craig A. Searls, for Albert Narath, for Preston B. Herrington, for Peter S. Hamilton, for Roger L. Hagengruber, for James R. Gosler, for Harold L. Folley, for Robert L. Ewing, for C. William Childers, for Harvey J. Brewster, for Sandia Corporation (mbm) mbm writes "Appellee/Respondent's brief due 3/24/95" Sandia had sent me a copy of its brief by 3/28/96. I filed attached MOTION TO GRANT PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT'S DEMANDS ON BASIS THAT DEFENDANT-APPELLEES FAILED TO FILE BRIEF WITHIN 30 DAYS SPECIFIED BY FEDERAL RULE OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE 31 on Tuesday the 28th day of March, 1995 My February 28 MOTION at the Tenth Circuit is filed WITHOUT notice of service logged. 4/4/95 [845484] Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief. Original and 3 copies c/s: y (mbm) In 1995 FRAP 25 (a) stated "[b]riefs shall be deemed filed on the day of mailing if the most expeditious form of delivery by mail, excepting special delivery, is used." FRAP 25 has been changed by 1998 to http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Since I mailed Appellant's motion filed by Appellant William H. Payne [94-2205] to grant appellant's demands on basis that appellees' failed to file timely brief on 3/28/98, it is likely Sandia's lawyer Friedman received it 3/29/95. Tenth Circuit logs 3/30/95 [844759] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia Corporation, Harvey J. Brewster, C. William Childers, Robert L. Ewing, Harold L. Folley, James R. Gosler, Roger L. Hagengruber, Peter S. Hamilton, Preston B. Herrington, Albert Narath, Craig A. Searls, Tommy A. Sellers, Mary J. Stang, Paul A. Stokes, Robert Surran, Thomas P. Wright. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 3/27/95 Oral Argument? y (appellant is pro se) Appellant's optional reply brief due 4/13/95 for William H. Payne (mbm) Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure [FRAP] 26 (c) states (c) Additional Time after Service. When a party is required or permitted to act within a prescribed period after service of a paper upon that party, 3 calendar days are added to the prescribed period unless the paper is delivered on the date of service stated in the proof of service. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#26c While the Tenth Circuit ASSERTS Appellees brief was, in fact, served on 3/27/95 evidence given below points to the brief was served, in fact, on 3/29/95. I allege that Friedman affixed a false date of service to Sandia's brief. I WAS NEVER PROPERLY SERVED. I wrote Wednesday March 29, 1995 Dan Friedman Simons, Cuddy & Friedman Pecos Trail Office Compound 1701 Old Pecos Trail POB 4160 Santa Fe, NM 87502-4160 505-988-4476 505-984-1807 FAX Dear Lawyer Friedman: Today at 14:00 hours I found a green and white about 9x13 inch envelope in our mail box at my home. Mailing label indicated that the envelope came from your firm. CONFIDENTIAL was stamped on the mailing label. I wrote "Received at 14:00 hours on W 3/29/95 with no POSTMARK OR STAMP by W. H. Payne" at the bottom of the envelope. There was no STAMP OR POSTAGE METER LABEL or POSTMARK on the envelope. Therefore, I gave the envelope to US Postal Service supervisor Mel at 14:49 hours today at the Postal Receiving station at 9904 Montgomery, NW in Albuquerque. Mel has a copy of the cover of the envelope with Mel's note written on it. Mel told me the post office was going to return the envelope to your firm for proper mailing. I ask: 1 What did this envelope contain? Please identify the documents precisely. 2 If any Certificates of Service were included in the envelope, then what were the dates affixed to these documents? 3 Who placed this envelope in our mail box? Lawyer Friedman: It appears you missed an important filing date. And are in the process of attempt to correct your failure. But may be using illegitimate methods to conceal your failure. Please respond as soon as possible so that we all may discover what has happened here." ... Lawyer Friedman did not respond to the above letter. But Friedman did mail me Appellees brief many days later in envelope showing TRUE MAILING date. Certificate of service on received Appellees brief did not reflect postmark date. 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 But Tenth Circuit clerks Fisher and Hoecker despite my protests and submission of evidence may have stamped FILED on Sandia's IMPROPERLY SERVED Appellee/Respondent's brief according to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. Laywer Friedman FALSIFIED THE CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. Friedman DID NOT MAIL ME "Served on 3/27/95." d) Proof of Service; Filing. A paper presented for filing shall contain an acknowledgment of service by the person served or proof of service in the form of a statement of the date and manner of service, of the name of the person served, and of the addresses to which the papers were mailed or at which they were delivered, certified by the person who made service. Proof of service may appear on or be affixed to the papers filed. When a brief or appendix is filed by mailing or dispatch in accordance with Rule 25(a)(2)(B), the proof of service shall also state the date and manner by which the document was mailed or dispatched to the clerk. http://www.ca5.uscourts.gov/docs/frap-iop.htm#25a Crime apparently committed by Hoecker and Fisher is § 1017. Government seals wrongfully used and instruments wrongfully sealed Whoever fraudulently or wrongfully affixes or impresses the seal of any department or agency of the United States, to or upon any certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper or with knowledge of its fraudulent character, with wrongful or fraudulent intent, uses, buys, procures, sells, or transfers to another any such certificate, instrument, commission, document, or paper, to which or upon which said seal has been so fraudulently affixed or impressed, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/1017.shtml Despite my protests of judicial misconduct Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis award decision to Sandia 10/6/95 [890055] Order filed by Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis "...All outstanding motions are denied..." (found in Order & Judgment of 10/6/95) [879579-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) when these judges should not have had Appellees brief before them. Then in an apparently attempt to conceal what happened 10/6/95 [890076] NOTE: THIS ENTIRE CASE IS SEALED. Terminated on the Merits after Submission Without Oral Hearing; Judgment Affirmed; Written, Signed, Unpublished. Moore, authoring judge; Barrett; Weis. [94-2205] (pdw) I WON MY APPEAL, pro se, ON A TECHNICALITY but judges Judges Moore, Barrett, Weis awarded the win to Sandia Labs! Members of Congress, judicial misconduct in this matter has been well-documented. Court records filed with the Tenth Circuit. But CURRENTLY under seal. Lawyers involved in this matter attempt to use the legal strategy of IGNORE and STONEWALL to attempt to deny me justice. Ignoring and stonewalling by lawyers forced Morales and me to seek visibility so lawyers could no longer ignore and stonewall. Lawyer attitude apparently is that they ignore rules of civil procedure or even the law so long as their actions are invisible to public scrutiny. Visibility was achieved by suing the National Security Agency which revealed even more judicial misconduct http://www.jya.com/whp052898.htm. I would like to settle all matters involved with this unfortunate cyrpto-related matter, which includes criminal violations of the Privacy Act. DOE lawyer Steve Dillingham asked me to prepare a settlement offer in 1994. I wrote a settlement letter May 22, 1994 to Dillingham. Nothing happened. June 11, 1998 I made several modifications to my 1994 settlement letter and sent it e-mail to Robert Nordhaus, Chief Counsel, DOE. I ask that you 1 help with settlement of my six-year-old since I won my appeal at the Tenth Circuit, 2 investigate Tenth Circuit case 94-2205 Payne v. Sandia Corporation, et al to bring the guilty to justice. Sincerely william payne 505 292 7037 I am not reading e-mail http://jya.com/whpfiles.htm http://www.apcatalog.com/cgi-bin/AP?ISBN=0125475705&LOCATION=US&FORM=FORM2 http://www-hto.usc.edu/software/seqaln/doc/html/gfsr.3.html Coauthor Lewis in the above is one of my former MS and PhD students in computer science. http://www.friction-free-economy.com/ Monday 6/22/98 1:04 PM Members of Congress Purpose of this e-mail is to give written proof of criminal judicial misconduct by Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals clerks Hoecker, Fisher, and Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan and request a congressional investigation. After several years, with Payne, of trying to get Tenth Circuit to send docket sheets from my case, citizen John Young http://www.jya.com/index.htm locates docket sheets and posts them Morales Case Dockets 10th USCA June 12, 1998 on Internet at http://www.jya.com/arm061298.htm. Source: Online records Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals via PACER GENERAL DOCKET FOR Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals Court of Appeals Docket #: 95-2204 Filed: 9/29/95 Nsuit: 3440 Morales v. Sandia National Lab. Appeal from: United States District Court for the District of New Mexico I filed 11/9/95 [898274] Appellant's brief filed by Arthur R. Morales. Original and 2 copies. c/s: y. Served on 11/7/95. Oral argument? pro se. Appellee's brief due 12/11/95 for Sandia National Lab. (pdw) Sandia files its FIRST ATTEMPT at 12/11/95 [905033] Appellee's deficient brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Appellee's corrected brief due 12/21/95 for Sandia National Lab. additional copies received 12/11/95. (fg) Tenth Circuit court clerk Patrick Fisher writes Wells on December 11, 1995 concerning Sandia's deficient brief [C]orrections, however made, must be accompanied by proof of service upon all other parties to the appeal. ... and issues 12/14/95 [905975] FIRST notice of rules violation for Deborah D. Wells for Appellee Sandia National Lab. (sls) Wells submits 12/21/95 [907974] Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 Oral Argument? n Appellant's optional reply brief due 1/8/96 for Arthur R. Morales (mbm) but DOES NOT serve me with a copy. Wells later admits in 2/1/96 [917660] Response filed by Sandia National Lab. Appellant/Petitioner motion to clarify Original and 3 copies. c/s: y response Null Relief Code (fg) Certificate of Service date 30th day of January, 1996, [h]ad Appellant simply made a phone call to the Tenth Circuit, he could have established that the Defendant-Appellee's corrected brief was indeed filed on a timely basis, ... I protested by filing 1/3/96 [909965] Appellant's motion "for the Court to Grant Appeal" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909966] Appellant's motion "for New Trial" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) 1/3/96 [909967] Appellant's motion "to Discipline Defendant-Appellee" filed by Appellant Arthur R. Morales [95-2204]. Original and 3 copies. c/s: y. (pdw) because Sandia did not properly serve me in violation of Fisher's December 11, 1995 order. The Tenth Circuit court of appeals should NOT, by its own rules, filed Appellee's brief filed by Sandia National Lab.. Original and 7 copies. c/s: y. Served on 12/20/95 10th Cir. R. 25.4 in 1995 page 62 reads Papers not accepted for filing. -- The clerk shall not file papers that do not comply with the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and these rules See 10thCir. R. 42.1 And is doubtful whether court clerk Fisher had any authority under appellate procedure to permit Wells to correct her deficient brief. Rather Sandia's brief did not comply with with Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and should have been summarily rejected for filing. I WON, pro se, my appeal to the Tenth circuit on a technicality but Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan awarded the win to Sandia Labs. 4/2/96 [932848] Order filed by Judges Anderson, Barrett, Logan denying parties' motions for general relief(found in Order and Judgment of 4/2/96)--"...During the course of this appeal, the parties have filed various motions for dismissal, summary grant, and sanctions. We find no merit to any of these motions, and they are [920851-1] Parties served by mail. (pdw) by accepting and judging on a documents which was not permitted to be before the court by its own rules. Judicial misconduct in my case has been well-documented as it is in Payne's case. Payne and I speculate that similar judicial misconduct may have occurred at the Tenth Circuit. Sandia lawyer Robert J Park wrote me a settlement letter on Feb 18, 1998. I filled in the blanks and made minor handwritten chages and returned it on February 22, 1998. But my offer has not yet been accepted. I ask that you 1 help have my settlement offer accepted, 2 investigate judicial misconduct in case 95-2204 and punish the guilty. Some citizens can only express such frustrations with the US court system with violence. I seek change by legal reform. Sincerely Arthur R Morales 505 345 1381

1 0

New Features @ CNN Custom News
by CustomNews＠INTMAIL.TURNER.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Hello and thanks for using CNN Custom News. As part of our commitment to make the best personalized news service even better, CNN and Oracle have recently added two great new features to Custom News at http://cnn.com/CustomNews: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< KEEP AN EYE ON YOUR FAVORITE CATEGORY! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< This latest feature allows you to choose one category that will always appear at the top of your personal picks when you check Custom News. For instance, if U.S.:Government:Presidential is your favorite category, you don't have to go to the U.S. page to see it...put it front and center on your personal homepage. To select your favorite category, visit your Custom Profile page at: http://CustomNews.CNN.com/cnews/pna_cust.customize#Favorite and use the drop down box to make your choice. Push the 'done' button and that's it! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< WE'VE ADDED YET ANOTHER SOURCE: PR NEWSWIRE >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< The addition of PR Newswire to Custom News provides even deeper business content and improved tracking of particular companies. The latest press releases are available to you almost as soon as they hit the wire. Now, you'll be able to track even more of the latest news regarding your specific companies of interest! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< WHAT IF I'VE FORGOTTEN MY PASSWORD? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>*<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< If you have not used the service in a while or are on a new computer, you may need to enter your user name and password. If you can remember your user name, but forgot your password, the system will prompt you with the reminder message you created at the time of registration. The reminder will appear directly above your login name. If you have forgotten both your user name and password, simply open a new account with our QuickStart Profile option. It's fast and easy to start using CNN Custom News again! Thanks for your time. If you haven't already, come by CNN.com/CustomNews and check out the improved Custom News service. Sincerely, The CNN Custom News Team http://CNN.com/CustomNews ============================================================= If you would rather not receive future updates about Custom News features and events, please go to http://CustomNews.CNN.com/cnews/pna_auth.register and uncheck the "new Custom News features" checkbox. If you cannot access the above page, but would like to be unsubscribed from this list, please go to http://CNN.com/EMAIL/customnews/ and enter your e-mail address. Please DO NOT reply to this e-mail address. CNN Interactive email id:11339101041640714

1 0

Fwd: Re: Banning privacy: A radical proposal
by Jean-Francois Avon 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

==================BEGIN FORWARDED MESSAGE================== >From: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon(a)citenet.net> >To: "William H. Geiger III" <whgiii(a)invweb.net> >Date: Wed, 24 Jun 1998 10:38:12 -0500 >Reply-To: "Jean-Francois Avon" <jf_avon(a)citenet.net> >Priority: Normal >X-Mailer: PMMail 98 Standard (2.00.1500) For Windows 95 (4.0.1111) >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >Subject: Re: Banning privacy: A radical proposal > On Wed, 24 Jun 1998 00:38:06 -0500, William H. Geiger III wrote: > >And if they really want to save some children why don't they shut down the >multi-billion dollar infanticide industry known as abortion. Why are these >medical hacks allowed to do to children what they would be jailed for >doing to a dog? Perhaps because it serves nicely with the elitist goals of >population control (need to keep the number of niggers, bean pickers, and >white trash down to a controllable number) not to mention that their >pockets are well lined by the hacks. Hey William, that's called "woman freedom to choose". Woman right precedes the baby-that-might-be rights for she is the sine-qua-none condition for the baby-who-might-be to exist. But it is only *very* rarely that I disagree with you... ;-) Ciao jfa Definition: FACISM: n.: a political and economic movement, strongly nationalistic, magnifying the rights of the state as opposed to those of the individual, in which industry, though remaining largely under private ownership, and all administrative political units, are controlled by a strong central government. ------------------------------------------------- "One of the ordinary modes by which tyrants accomplish their purpose, without resistance, is by disarming the people and making it an offense to keep arms". - Joseph Story, U.S. Supreme Court Justice. ------------------------------------------------- "1935 will go down in history! For the first time a civilized nation has full gun registration! Our streets will be safer, our police more efficient, and the world will follow our lead in the future!" -Adolf Hitler, April 1935 ------------------------------------------------- PGP keys: http://bs.mit.edu:8001/pks-toplev.html PGP ID:C58ADD0D:529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891 PGP ID:5B51964D:152ACCBCD4A481B0 254011193237822C ===================END FORWARDED MESSAGE=================== Jean-Francois Avon, B.Sc. Physics, Montreal, Canada DePompadour, Société d'Importation Ltée Limoges fine porcelain and french crystal JFA Technologies, R&D physicists & engineers Instrumentation & control, LabView programming PGP keys: http://bs.mit.edu:8001/pks-toplev.html PGP ID:C58ADD0D:529645E8205A8A5E F87CC86FAEFEF891 PGP ID:5B51964D:152ACCBCD4A481B0 254011193237822C

3 3

ACLU Action Update 06-25-98 -- Victory! (fwd)
by Anonymous 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

--------------------------------------------------------------- 06-25-98 ACLU Action Update ---------------------------------------------------------------- TO: Action Network FR: Penny Crawley, Cyber Organizer (pcrawley(a)aclu.org) DT: June 25, 1998 1. Victims' Rights Amendment 2. Child Custody Protection:/"Teen Endagerment" Act 3. New E-mail address 1. We did it! With both the House and Senate now adjourned for the Fourth of July recess, "Amend the Constitution Month" in Congress has come to an end a victory: the Constitution remains intact! The Senate Judiciary met briefly this morning to consider the so-called Victims' Rights Amendment (SJ Res. 44), the last of the three amendments targeted by the Republican leadership for passage during June. Although there was a brief debate on this measure, the Committee adjourned for the recess without taking action. It is anticipated that it will take up the proposed amendment shortly after Senators return to Washington on July 6. A new website can be found on the Internet containing editorials and other resources (testimony, position statements and letters to Congress) on why a constitutional amendment is the wrong way to assist victims of crime. The site is located at: http://soiroom.hyperchat.com/celestin/vrainfo.html ACTION NEEDED: A. Urge your U.S. Senators to honor the founding of our nation this Fourth of July by preserving the original Bill of Rights and voting against the victims' rights amendment by sending a FREE FAX from the ACLU website at: http://www.aclu.org/action/victim.html B. Because no advocacy tactic is more effective than personal interaction, push home the point about preserving the Bill of Rights during any public appearance your Senators make during the Fourth of July recess. 2. Child Custody Protection/"Teen Endangerment" Bill Like the Victims' Rights amendment, action on the anti-choice Child Custody Protection Act (S 1645/HR 3682), which was also on today's agenda in the Senate Judiciary Committee, was postponed when the Committee adjourned for recess. It, too, is expected to be taken up when Senators return to the Capitol. ACTION NEEDED: Urge your Senators to oppose this misguided bill, which would intrude into Americans' private relationships, isolate young women by discouraging them from seeking the caring support of a trusted adult, and endanger their lives by forcing them to travel alone to an abortion provider and back home after the surgery. Send a FREE FAX from the ACLU website at: http://www.aclu.org/action/custody.html 3. My e-mail address has changed! All future e-mail should be sent to: pcrawley(a)aclu.org Please update any listings in your address book to reflect the change. (My AOL address will remain active until July 31, 1998.) ---------------------------------------------------------------- ONLINE RESOURCES FROM THE ACLU NATIONAL OFFICE ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACLU Freedom Network Web Page: http://www.aclu.org. Constitution Hall on America Online (keyword ACLU) ---------------------------------------------------------------- ACLU Action Update ACLU National Washington Office 122 Maryland Avenue NE Washington, DC 20002 To subscribe to the ACLU Action List, send a message to majordomo(a)aclu.org with "subscribe action" in the body of the message. To end your subscription, send a message to majordomo(a)aclu.org with "unsubscribe action" in the body of the message. For general information about the ACLU, write to info(a)aclu.org This Message sent to action

1 0

OCR'ed versions of Skipjack docs
by Ernest Hua 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Anyone have an OCR'ed version of this? These PDF's look like scanned or faxed images. Ern -----Original Message----- From: John Young [SMTP:jya@pipeline.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 1998 6:53 AM To: cypherpunks(a)toad.com Subject: Skipjack Up John, The files are up, and hopefully all working OK. See http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/skipjack-kea.htm Ed Roback

1 0

Comments on "Encryption is Key to Securing Data" 22 Jun 98
by Bruce Schneier 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

This note is to comment on your article, "Encryption is Key to Securing Data," that appeared in the 22 Jun 98 issue of InternetWeek. I'm not sure where to start. Almost every statement made in the copy is erroneous. (There was an error when I tried to download the article from your website, so I will retype. Apologies for minor typos.) Encryption is Key to Securing Data by Dayna DelMonico "Although encryption terminology can make even the most technically astute user cringe, encryption is fairly simple." I agree, although the rest of this article seems to prove me wrong. "It's the process of scambling and unscrambling information." Partly. It's confidentially (what you said above--making sure secret things stay secret), integrity (making sure data doesn't get modified in transit), authentication (the digital analogue of a signature), and non-repudiation (making sure someone can't say something and then later deny saying it). Cryptography is a lot more than simple encryption. "Encryption products showed up when MIS managers adopted two basic encryption technologies from the federal government: private and public-key encryption." Nothing correct here. The Federal government has no public-key cryptography standards; MIS managers have nothing to adopt from the Federal government. You might be thinking of DES, a symmetric encryption algorithm. (More on this confusion below.) In any case, commercial use of cryptography products has developed completely independently from government interference. In fact, things like export control and key escrow are making it harder to buy secure commercial products, not easier. "With private key encryption, the sends and recieve are the holders and use the same key (algorithm) to secure information." No. First off, private-key encryption is a bad term; use "symmetric encryption." Second, I'm not sure what they are the holders of. With symmetric encryption, both the sender and the receiver must have the same key; that may be what you mean. In any case, the key and the algorithm are completely seperate. This is one of the cornerstones of post-Medieval cryptography. "With public key encryption, senders and receivers hold a commonly used public key, with an additional private key held only by specific institutions." Not even close. With public-key encryption, each receiver has a public key and a private key. The public key is published. The private key is held, in secret, by the receiver. To send a message to someone, the sender gets the public key form some public database and uses it to encrypt the message. The receiver uses his private key to decrypt it. There are no specific institutions that have additional private keys, unless you are thinking about key escrow systems (which are related, but not the same). "To protect systems from the loss of the key, many vendors offer assymetric encypion, which uses two keys." Sort of. Assymetric encryption is the same as public-key encryption (just another word), and there are two keys. But the reason for using public-key encryption is not to prevent the loss of a key, but to facilitate key management. (With symmetric encryption, both the sender and receiver have to share a key. How this sharing takes place can be very complicated.) "Users can choose from products based on various schemes. Beware, however, that even stronger encryption methods are on the horizon and destined for the next generation of encryption products. The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is expected to complete and Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) by the end of the year." Even NIST has said that AES will not be finalized before 2000. And AES is just a new symmetric algorithm; it has nothing to do with public-key cryptography. "The new standard wil luse a 128-bit block size, with key lengths of 128-, 192-, and 256-bits, as opposed to the current 64-bit blocks with 56-bit key standard." True. The current standard is DES. "RSA Data Security also has proposed its own algorithm to content for the new AES standard." Sort of. NIST has solicited proposals for algorithms. Fifteen groups submitted, including RSA Data Security. RSADSI is competing with other groups--Cylink, IBM, Entrust, Counterpane Systems, NTT, etc--not with NIST. NIST does not hav an algorithm. "RSA's extensions to DES, RC4 and RC5 implement multiple keys as well as digital signatures." Many mistakes here. RSADSI submitted RC6 to the AES process, which uses many ideas from RC5. It has nothing to do with DES or RC4. I'm not sure why multiple keys is something to talk about; as I said above, every algorithm post the Middle Ages uses multiple keys. And digital signatures have nothing to do with the AES process. AES is a new symmetric encryption algorithm; digital signatures are done with public key cryptography. They are different. "Another contender is Blowfish II." I submitted this algorithm. We called it Twofish, but some early press reports called it Blowfish II. "The Blowfish scheme, often referred to as PGP (Pretty Good Privacy), lets the sending and receiving computers negotiate a complex number." First, Blowfish is never referred to as PGP. Blowfish is a symmetric encryption algorithm. PGP is an email security product. PGP could have decided to use Blowfish, but it used IDEA and CAST instead. Those are two different encrytpion algorithms. And neither PGP, nor Blowfish, nor anything else discussed to or alluded to in this article, involve sending and receiving computers negotiating complex numbers. "That number is used to scamble the transmission and unscramble the data that is received." What you mean to say, I think, is that PGP uses public-key cryptography for key exchange. The sender uses the reciver's public key to encrypt a session key, and that session key is used to encrypt the email message. "For more on encryption and encryption products, a buyer's first stop should be the International Computer Security Association. This ICSA is an independent organization that tests and certifies security products." ICSA is a private for-profit company, despite what the name implies. And while they do do some testing and certifying of security products, they do not test or certify encryption products. Honestly, I can't believe this article made it into print. Don't you have editors? Bruce Schneier President, Counterpane Systems Author, Applied Cryptography http://www.counterpane.com

1 0

CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM - June 24, 1998
by CTIA Daily News 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

===================================== Welcome to today's edition of the CTIA Daily News from WOW-COM. Please click on the icon for the most important news in wireless communications today. CALEA Summit being held July 21 & 22 in Washington, DC. Register Now!! Call (202) 785-0081 =====================================

1 0

Skipjack extensibility
by nobody＠REPLAY.COM 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

NSA made a claim that Skipjack couldn't be extended past 80 bits of key. Most plausible explanation to my mind is that they're lying. Second is that there is an attack against a class of Skipjack-like ciphers that requires only a few plaintexts and 2^80 operations. Third is that some common key-lengthening tricks like those for 2-key-3DES, DES-X, and DEAL fail when applied to Skipjack. I can hardly fathom one resistant to all three, but I guess it's possible with NSA. Seems to me that you could always figure out some construct so that no practically-secure cipher with Skipjack's observable properties could evade having its key lengthened with much probability. Or maybe not. IANAC. Besides, it's impossible to make a cipher that can't be used to construct constructs with bigger key lengths: Skipjack(cryptovariable, IDEA(key, plaintext)) -- terminology jab intended -- provably has an effective key length as long as IDEA's. Even if that is cheating...

2 1

NSA Declass Query
by John Young 17 Dec '03

17 Dec '03

Spyrus claims in a press release yesterday that NSA announced declassification of SKIPJACK and KEA on June 6, earlier than the DoD notice on June 23. Does anyone know where and how NSA made this earlier announcement, and whether there is a document on it? We've queried Spyrus but no answer yet. Spyrus has scheduled a June 30 conference on its release of a FORTEZZA library and products in connection with the NSA declassification. Bruce Schneier is a keynote speaker. http://www.spyrus.com/company/releases/pr_swf.html

1 0